PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI AN ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSLATION OF FIGURES OF SPEECH FOUND IN COCO MOVIE A SARJANA PENDIDIKAN THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Education By Andreas Tri Hartana Student Number: 141214156 ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2018 i PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ABSTRACT Hartana, Andreas Tri. (2018). An Analysis of the Translation of Figures of Speech Found in Coco Movie. Yogyakarta: English Language Education, Sanata Dharma University. Movie’s subtitle is a product of translation. Translation is a process of transferring the meaning from source language into the target language. Translating English subtitle is not easy, especially if the movie contains many figures of speech expressions. The translator should be aware in translating the figure of speech expressions because they cannot be translated literally. This research analyzed the types of figures of speech found in COCO movie and how acceptable the translation of the figures of speech is. The researcher chooses COCO movie because it is a new, popular and an inspiring movie. It is an animation movie, which contains figures of speech inside of it. There are two research questions. They are: (1) What types of figures of speech are found in the COCO movie? And (2) How acceptable is the translation of the figures of speech in the Indonesian subtitle? It is a qualitative research and uses document analysis technique. The researcher uses Abrams’ theory (1999) to classify the types of the figures of speech that used in the movie and for the second research question, the researcher uses Larson’s theory (1984) of the degree of acceptability translation. The researcher found 75 expressions that contain figures of speech. They are divided into 3 kinds of figures of speech, namely; 35 metaphors (47%), 32 personifications (43%) and eight litotes (10%). The researcher also analyzes the acceptability degree of the translation of the figures of speech, the researcher found 52 expressions classified as Ideal-acceptable translation (69%), 15 expressions categorized as acceptable translations (20%), 5 expressions included in Unacceptable translations (7%), and 3 expressions are failed translations (4%). As the result, the translation of the figures of speech in COCO movie are categorized as a good translation because 89% of the figures of speech are acceptable translation. Keywords: translation, figures of speech, COCO movie, subtitle. vi PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ABSTRAK Hartana, Andreas Tri. (2018). An Analysis of the Translation of Figures of Speech Found in Coco movie. Yogyakarta: English Language Education, Sanata Dharma University. Subtitle film adalah hasil dari penerjemahan. Penerjemahan adalah sebuah proses memindahakan arti dari bahasa asal ke bahasa sasaran. Menerjemahkan subtitle berbahasa Inggris tidaklah mudah, teristimewa apabila film mengandung banyak majas. Penerjemah harus berhati-hati dalam menerjemahkan majas karena majas tidak dapat diterjemahkan secara literal. Penelitian ini menganalisis tipe-tipe majas yang digunakan dalam film berjudul COCO dan seberapa dapat diterimanya terjemahan majas yang ditemukan dalam film. Peneliti memilih film COCO karena film ini adalah film yang tergolong baru, popular dan menginspirasi. Film ini adalah sebuah film animasi, dan terdapat majas di dalamnya. Peneliti memiliki tujuan untuk menjawab dua rumusan masalah. (1) Apa saja tipe majas yang ditemukan dalam film COCO? dan (2) Bagaimana tingkat penerimaan penerjemahan majas dalam subtitle berbahasa Indonesia? Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dan menggunakan analisis dokumen. Peneliti menggunakan teori dari Abrams (1999) untuk mengklasifikasikan tipe-tipe majas yang digunakan dalam film dan untuk rumusan masalah yang kedua, peneliti menggunakan teori Larson (1984) tentang tingkat penerimaan penerjemahan. Peneliti menemukan 64 ekspresi yang mengandung majas. Majas terbagi dalam 3 jenis, yaitu; 35 metafora (47%), 29 personifikasi (43%) dan 8 litotes (10%). Penrliti juga menganalisis tentang tingkat penerimaan penerjemahan, peneliti menemukan 52 ekspresi yang diklasifikasikan sebagai terjemahan yang diterima dengan baik (69%), 15 terjemahan diterima (20%), 5 terjemahan tidak diterima (7%) dan 3 gagal diterjemahkan (4%). Dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerjemahan majas dalam film COCO dikategorikan sebagai penerjemahan yang baik karena 89% majas adalah terjemahaan yang diterima. Keywords: translation, figures of speech, COCO movie, subtitle. vii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI “ I dedicated this thesis to my family, translators, English teachers and English learners. viii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I would like to express my gratitude to Jesus Christ, for his blessing and his endless grace to me. I would like thank my parents, Johanes Sujono and Anastasia Jumilah, who always accompany and give me support during my journey of life. I thank also to my brother who always support me in my good and bad times. Then, I would like to express my gratitude to my thesis advisor, Laurentia Sumarni, S.Pd., M. Trans. St., for always guiding me in doing my thesis and giving motivation and suggestion. I thank her patience, kindness, happiness and everything given to me. I thank Dr. Retno Muljani, M.Pd. who guides me in Proposal Seminar class. I also thank my academic advisors, Concilianus Laos Mbato, M.A., Ed. D., and Christina Lhaksmita Anandari, Ed. M., for their guidance during my study. My gratitude also goes to all the ELESP lecturers for giving me their knowledge, especially to C. Sih Prabandari, S.Pd., M.Hum., who helps me in validating my data. I thank PBI F 2014, especially Gavrilla Albertina Tarigan, Erlia Novitasari, Fikriya Choiruna, Elizabeth Lovilla, Benedictus Pandhu, Atika Zahra, and Widyananda and who give me support in finishing my thesis. I thank also to Clara Nusaca for her support during finishing my thesis. I also thank Deo, Yosa, Ardi, Adna, Martin Sulistyo, Wendi and all member of Badminton 14 group who give me a chance to play badminton with them. ix PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI Lastly, I thank my friends in the thesis class, Vero, Andre, Mici, Ryan, Sani, Jessica, Clara Farida, Edo, Ully, Elan, and Martin Zai, who struggle together with me in writing thesis. I would also say thanks to those names I cannot mention one by one. Andreas Tri Hartana x PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................ i APPROVAL PAGES .................................................................................... ii STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY ............................................. iv PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI .............................................. v ABSTRACT .................................................................................................. vi ABSTRAK ..................................................................................................... vii DEDICATION PAGE ................................................................................... viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................... ix TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................. xi LIST OF TABLE S ........................................................................................ xiii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................... xiv LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................... xv CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 1 A. Research Background.................................................................. 1 B. Research Questions ..................................................................... 2 C. Research Significance ............................................................... 3 D. Definition of Terms ..................................................................... 4 CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ...................... 5 A. Theoretical Description ............................................................... 5 1. Theories of Figurative Languages ......................................... 5 a. Metaphor ......................................................................... 6 b. Personification................................................................. 8 c. Litotes .............................................................................. 9 2. Theories of Translation ......................................................... 9 a. Definition of Translation ................................................ 10 b. Kinds of Translation ...................................................... 11 c. Translation Method ......................................................... 11 xi PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI d. Criteria of Good Translation .......................................... 13 3. Theories of Subtitling .. ........................................................