Ohio Plant Disease Index

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ohio Plant Disease Index Special Circular 128 December 1989 Ohio Plant Disease Index The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio This page intentionally blank. Special Circular 128 December 1989 Ohio Plant Disease Index C. Wayne Ellett Department of Plant Pathology The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio T · H · E OHIO ISJATE ! UNIVERSITY OARilL Kirklyn M. Kerr Director The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio All publications of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center are available to all potential dientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, sex, age, handicap, or Vietnam-era veteran status. 12-89-750 This page intentionally blank. Foreword The Ohio Plant Disease Index is the first step in develop­ Prof. Ellett has had considerable experience in the ing an authoritative and comprehensive compilation of plant diagnosis of Ohio plant diseases, and his scholarly approach diseases known to occur in the state of Ohia Prof. C. Wayne in preparing the index received the acclaim and support .of Ellett had worked diligently on the preparation of the first the plant pathology faculty at The Ohio State University. edition of the Ohio Plant Disease Index since his retirement This first edition stands as a remarkable ad substantial con­ as Professor Emeritus in 1981. The magnitude of the task tribution by Prof. Ellett. The index will serve us well as the is illustrated by the cataloguing of more than 3,600 entries complete reference for Ohio for many years to come. of recorded diseases on approximately 1,230 host or plant species in 124 families. Prof. Ellett also incoq'.Jorated a Charles R. Curtis, Chairperson valuable historical account of collectors and their collections Department of Plant Pathology to supplement the early plant disease records. June 12, 1989 Acknowledgements Many individuals have provided encouragement and Clinic, and L. E. Williams and C. R. Curtis for review of assistance in the compilation of this index. Without their portions of the index. I would also like to thank F. H. Berry, help an index of this magnitude would have been impossi­ Plant Pathologist (retired), USDA Forest Service ble. It is a pleasure to acknowledge the assistance of the laboratories, Delaware, Ohio, for records of decay fungi faculty of the Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio isolated from tree plots in Ohio and P. H. Kaufman, Plant State University. Special thanks are due to Curt Leben, H. Pathologist, Division of Plant Industry, Ohio Department A J. Hoitink, P. E. Lipps, L. J. Herr, L H. Rhodes, M. A of Agriculture, for disease records from nurseries in Ohio. Ellis, R. C. Rowe, and W. W. Shane for reviewing and pro­ I am greatly indebted to W. W. Shane for his patience viding additional records for certain crop plants. I also thank and the many hours spent on all the computer-related ac­ A F. Schmitthenner for providing his records of Pythium tivities of this endeavor. and Phytophthora species, R Louie for virus records on The following Ohio State University and OARDC per­ the Gramineae, R. M. Reidel for many of the records of sonnel are gratefully acknowledged for their assistance in nematodes, S. T. Nameth for records of viru.ses and mak­ manuscript preparation: Susan K. Harshe, Ramona Powell, ing available reports from the Plant and Pest Diagnostic and Bonnie Bing. .. ~ Table of Contents Introduction . i A Brief Historical Review . i Scientific and Common Names of Host Plants .... ii Names of Pathogens ........................ ii Sources of Entries in this Index . ii References to the Literature Describing the Pathogen or Causal Agent . ii Additional References Helpful for Identification of Fungi Causing Plant Disease . iii Example of an Entry in the Index . iv Abbreviations Used in the Index ............ v Host Plant Index . 1 Addenda ............................. 78 References and Literature Cited . 79 Index to Common Names ................ 82 Index to Scientific Plant Names ............ 88 Index to Pathogens, Except Viruses . 91 Index to Virus and Virus-Like Agents ...... 116 On the Cover: Germinating conidia of the powdery mildew fungus, Erysiphe polygoni. From a photomicrograph. This page intentionally blank. Ohio· Plant Disease Index C. Wayne Ellett1 Introduction pointed assistant Botanist in 1899 at the Ohio Agricultural This annotated index is a compilation of the recorded and Experiment Station reported on many diseases of fruit and reported diseases and their causes of wild and cultivated vegetabie crops and prepared lists of· rust fungi of Ohio plants in Ohio. Each entry includes one or more authorities . plants in the 1890's. A. D. Selby from 1893 to .1923 re­ for listing the disease in Ohio Literature references providing ported on many Ohio plant diseases and as early as 1893 a, description of the pathogen or cause, are included for most published a list of powdery mildews. He received the B. Sc. entries. degree from The Ohio State University in 1893 and taught Publication of the Ohio Plant Disease Index does not botany at Co.lumbus High School before joining the staff imply the index is totally complete, but every effort was made as botanist and chemist at the Ohio Agricultural Experi­ to make it as comprehensive as possible. It is not a corp­ ment Station. From 1904 to 1923 Selby served as Chief, plete listing of saprophytic fungi reported on plant hosts. Department of Botany, O~io Agricultural Experiment Sta­ Neither is it complete with respect to fungi (especially tion, Wooster. Hymenomycetes) that occur causing decay or rot of heart­ The first compilation of plant diseases in Ohio is a 19i0 wood or sapwood There are many Ohio collections of these publication by Professor Selby (Ohio Agricultural Exp~ri­ species but the host tree often was not reported. Additional ment Station Bulletin No. 214). The publication by Selby new diseases certainly will be reported each year. As in all was a revised and expanded treatment of "A Condensed compilations of this kind some pathogens may have been Handbook of the Diseases of Cultivated Plants in Ohid' misidentified as well as some hosts. In some instances, published in 1900. It was much more than a listing of especially where collections were cited, it was possible to diseases of Ohio cultivated plants. It was a discussion of correct errors. All of the collections cited in this index were diseases in general. At the time of this publication it was examined personally by the author. reported to be the only general compilation and discussion Pathogen groups or causal agents are listed in the following of plant disease in America (Stover, Phytopathology order-Bacteria; Fungi; Nematodes; Viruses, Viroids, and 15:1-10). Selby was a charter member of the American Mycoplasmas; and Physiological or Abiotic causes. Causal Phytopathological Society and its President in 1911. agents within the above groups are listed in alphabetical In 1891 W. A. Kellerman became Chairman of the newly order. For a few host plants, insect- and mite-caused pro­ organized department of Botany & Forestry at Ohio State. blems are included where the symptoms resemble a plant He collected extensively, adding many specimens of disease. parasitic fungi to the herbarium of the University. Keller­ A complete entry for this index includes the following; man and Werner in 1893 prepared a list of Ohio plants scientific and common name of the host plant; pathogen for volume 7 of the Report of the Ohio Geological Survey. (genus and species) or causal agent; older names and alter­ One thousand species of fungi are included of which about nate state names, where applicable; disease(s) caused; 250 are parasitic. source(s) for the entry in parentheses; and reference(s) to Frank Lincoln Stevens, a part time graduate student at a description of the pathogen or causal agent. Ohio State and a teacher at Columbus North High School (1894-1898) collected in central Ohio and published four A Brief Historical Review lists of parasitic fungi. Later after leaving Ohio he publish­ The first list of fungi from Ohio was published by T. G. ed the well known and widely used book, The Fungi Which Lea in 1849, as a part of a Catalogue of Plants, Native and Cause Plant Disease. Edo Claassen collected in Cuyahoga Naturalized, Collected in the Vicinity of Cincinnati, Ohio, and nearby counties of northern Ohio from 1895 to the During the Years 1834-1844. Twenty to thirty of the 319 early 1920's and published several lists of powdery mildew fungi in this catalogue would today be considered as plant and rust fungi in the 1890's. pathogens; however, at that time fungi were not generally Other collectors of parasitic fungi in Ohio, 1890-1910 and recognized as causing plant disease. The fungi in Lea's list the general locality where they collected are listed. At least were identified by the Reverend M. J. Berkeley, well known some of the collections of these early collectors are in The British mycologist of the 19th century. In the 1880's, AP. Ohio State University fungus collections. Morgan's Mycologic Rora of the Miami Valley, Ohio was W. H. Aiken, Cincinnati, 1897-1910 published, but no parasitic species of fungi were included. E. E. Bogue, Ashtabula County, 1890's Beginning in the 1880's several persons became active Thomas Bonser, Wyandot County, Early 1900's as collectors of parasitic fungi. Frederica Detmers ap- Moses Craig, Columbus, 1888-1892 F. D. Kelsey, Oberlin, Toledo, 1890's 1 Professor Emeritus, Department of Plant Pathology L. C. Riddle, Columbus, 1895-1905 C. M. Weed, Columbus, 1895-1898 and their students. Most nematode entries in this index W. C. Werner, Columbus, Painesville, 1890's were provided by Riedel.
Recommended publications
  • Characterization of Two Undescribed Mucoralean Species with Specific
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 26 March 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201803.0204.v1 1 Article 2 Characterization of Two Undescribed Mucoralean 3 Species with Specific Habitats in Korea 4 Seo Hee Lee, Thuong T. T. Nguyen and Hyang Burm Lee* 5 Division of Food Technology, Biotechnology and Agrochemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 6 Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea; [email protected] (S.H.L.); 7 [email protected] (T.T.T.N.) 8 * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-(0)62-530-2136 9 10 Abstract: The order Mucorales, the largest in number of species within the Mucoromycotina, 11 comprises typically fast-growing saprotrophic fungi. During a study of the fungal diversity of 12 undiscovered taxa in Korea, two mucoralean strains, CNUFC-GWD3-9 and CNUFC-EGF1-4, were 13 isolated from specific habitats including freshwater and fecal samples, respectively, in Korea. The 14 strains were analyzed both for morphology and phylogeny based on the internal transcribed 15 spacer (ITS) and large subunit (LSU) of 28S ribosomal DNA regions. On the basis of their 16 morphological characteristics and sequence analyses, isolates CNUFC-GWD3-9 and CNUFC- 17 EGF1-4 were confirmed to be Gilbertella persicaria and Pilobolus crystallinus, respectively.To the 18 best of our knowledge, there are no published literature records of these two genera in Korea. 19 Keywords: Gilbertella persicaria; Pilobolus crystallinus; mucoralean fungi; phylogeny; morphology; 20 undiscovered taxa 21 22 1. Introduction 23 Previously, taxa of the former phylum Zygomycota were distributed among the phylum 24 Glomeromycota and four subphyla incertae sedis, including Mucoromycotina, Kickxellomycotina, 25 Zoopagomycotina, and Entomophthoromycotina [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Use of This PDF File of Herbaceous
    Fair Use of this PDF file of Herbaceous Perennials Production: A Guide from Propagation to Marketing, NRAES-93 By Leonard P. Perry Published by NRAES, July 1998 This PDF file is for viewing only. If a paper copy is needed, we encourage you to purchase a copy as described below. Be aware that practices, recommendations, and economic data may have changed since this book was published. Text can be copied. The book, authors, and NRAES should be acknowledged. Here is a sample acknowledgement: ----From Herbaceous Perennials Production: A Guide from Propagation to Marketing, NRAES- 93, by Leonard P. Perry, and published by NRAES (1998).---- No use of the PDF should diminish the marketability of the printed version. This PDF should not be used to make copies of the book for sale or distribution. If you have questions about fair use of this PDF, contact NRAES. Purchasing the Book You can purchase printed copies on NRAES’ secure web site, www.nraes.org, or by calling (607) 255-7654. Quantity discounts are available. NRAES PO Box 4557 Ithaca, NY 14852-4557 Phone: (607) 255-7654 Fax: (607) 254-8770 Email: [email protected] Web: www.nraes.org More information on NRAES is included at the end of this PDF. Acknowledgments This publication is an update and expansion of the 1987 Cornell Guidelines on Perennial Production. Informa- tion in chapter 3 was adapted from a presentation given in March 1996 by John Bartok, professor emeritus of agricultural engineering at the University of Connecticut, at the Connecticut Perennials Shortcourse, and from articles in the Connecticut Greenhouse Newsletter, a publication put out by the Department of Plant Science at the University of Connecticut.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Descriptions 2018 4/22/2018
    Tyler Plant Sale - Plant Descriptions 2018 4/22/2018 TypeDesc Botanical Common Season of Exposure Size Description Name Name Interest Woody: Vine Clematis Clematis Summer to Sun to 8-10' Clematis 'Cardinal Wyszynski' dazzles your garden with huge 8" glowing 'Cardinal Fall Partial crimson flowers. The vibrant flowers are accented with darker crimson Wyszynski' Shade anthers and light pink filaments. Blooms in June-July and again in September. Attracts pollinators. Easy to grow in a rich, porous, alkaline soil. Provide shade for the roots with a generous layer of mulch or a shallow-rooted groundcover near the base of the vine. Received the Golden Medal at 'Plantarium' in 1990. Woody: Vine Clematis Hybrid Summer Sun to 6-8’ Fully double white flowers have yellow anthers and green outer petals. 'Duchess of Clematis Partial They are borne on the previous year’s growth and the current season’s Edinburgh' Shade new growth. This clematis does not require heavy pruning, remove only weak or dead stems in late spring. Tolerates most garden soils, needs protection from cold winds. Woody: Vine Clematis Clematis Early Sun to 8-10’ A beautiful, compact vine that covers itself with 5” shell pink flowers in 'Hagley Summer Partial summer. 'Hagley Hybrid' is also know as Pink Chiffon. This is a large- Hybrid' Shade flowering clematis that can be grown as a container plant. It is best keep out of full sun to prevent bleaching of flowers. Prefers moist, well-drained soil and for best results, mulch. TypeDesc Botanical Common Season of Exposure Size Description Name Name Interest Woody: Vine Clematis x Clematis Summer to Sun to 6-10' This deciduous hybrid clematis, has unusual and very striking deep blue durandii Fall Partial flowers with creamy stamens on a non-clinging, scrambling vine.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 APS-IPPC Joint Meeting Abstracts of Presentations
    2011 APS-IPPC Joint Meeting Abstracts of Presentations Abstracts submitted for presentation at the APS-IPPC 2011 Joint Meeting in Honolulu, Hawaii, August 6–10, 2011 (including abstracts submitted for presentation at the 2011 APS Pacific Division Meeting). The abstracts are arranged alphabetically by the first author’s name. Prioritizing cover crops for improving root health and yield of vegetables ability of non-aflatoxigenic strains to prevent aflatoxin production by in the Northeast subsequent challenge with toxigenic A. flavus strains was assessed in 4 G. S. ABAWI (1), C. H. Petzoldt (1), B. K. Gugino (2), J. A. LaMondia (3) experiments. Non-aflatoxigenic strain K49 effectively prevented toxin (1) Cornell University, Geneva, NY, U.S.A.; (2) The Pennsylvania State production at various inoculation levels in 3 experiments. K49 also was University, University Park, PA, U.S.A.; (3) CT Agric. Exp. Station, Windsor, evaluated alongside the widely used biocontrol strains NRRL 21882 (Afla- CT, U.S.A. Guard®) and AF36 for prevention of aflatoxin and CPA production by strains Phytopathology 101:S1 K54 and F3W4. K49 and NRRL 21882 were superior to AF36 in reducing aflatoxins. K49 and NRRL 21882 produced no CPA, and reduced CPA and Cover crops are used increasingly by growers to improve soil quality, prevent aflatoxin production in a subsequent challenge with F3W4 and K54 by 84– erosion, increase organic matter, and suppress root pathogens and pests. 97% and 83–98%, respectively. In contrast, AF36 inoculation and subsequent However, limited information is available on their use for suppressing challenge with F3W4 reduced aflatoxins by 20% and 93% with K54, but pathogens (Rhizoctonia, Pythium, Fusarium, Thieloviopsis, Pratylenchus, and showed no CPA reduction with F3W4 and only 62% CPA reduction with Meloidogyne) of vegetables grown in the Northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
    Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetic and Scanning Electron Microscopical Analyses
    Acta Biologica Hungarica 59 (3), pp. 365–383 (2008) DOI: 10.1556/ABiol.59.2008.3.10 MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC AND SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPICAL ANALYSES PLACES THE CHOANEPHORACEAE AND THE GILBERTELLACEAE IN A MONOPHYLETIC GROUP WITHIN THE MUCORALES (ZYGOMYCETES, FUNGI) KERSTIN VOIGT1* and L. OLSSON2 1 Institut für Mikrobiologie, Pilz-Referenz-Zentrum, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Neugasse 24, D-07743 Jena, Germany 2 Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Erbertstr. 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany (Received: May 4, 2007; accepted: June 11, 2007) A multi-gene genealogy based on maximum parsimony and distance analyses of the exonic genes for actin (act) and translation elongation factor 1 alpha (tef ), the nuclear genes for the small (18S) and large (28S) subunit ribosomal RNA (comprising 807, 1092, 1863, 389 characters, respectively) of all 50 gen- era of the Mucorales (Zygomycetes) suggests that the Choanephoraceae is a monophyletic group. The monotypic Gilbertellaceae appears in close phylogenetic relatedness to the Choanephoraceae. The mono- phyly of the Choanephoraceae has moderate to strong support (bootstrap proportions 67% and 96% in distance and maximum parsimony analyses, respectively), whereas the monophyly of the Choanephoraceae-Gilbertellaceae clade is supported by high bootstrap values (100% and 98%). This suggests that the two families can be joined into one family, which leads to the elimination of the Gilbertellaceae as a separate family. In order to test this hypothesis single-locus neighbor-joining analy- ses were performed on nuclear genes of the 18S, 5.8S, 28S and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 ribo- somal RNA and the translation elongation factor 1 alpha (tef ) and beta tubulin (βtub) nucleotide sequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Exotic Species List
    Exotic Species in Illinois Descriptions for these exotic species in Illinois will be added to the Web page as time allows for their development. A name followed by an asterisk (*) indicates that a description for that species can currently be found on the Web site. This list does not currently name all of the exotic species in the state, but it does show many of them. It will be updated regularly with additional information. Microbes viral hemorrhagic septicemia Novirhabdovirus sp. West Nile virus Flavivirus sp. Zika virus Flavivirus sp. Fungi oak wilt Ceratocystis fagacearum chestnut blight Cryphonectria parasitica Dutch elm disease Ophiostoma novo-ulmi and Ophiostoma ulmi late blight Phytophthora infestans white-nose syndrome Pseudogymnoascus destructans butternut canker Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum Plants okra Abelmoschus esculentus velvet-leaf Abutilon theophrastii Amur maple* Acer ginnala Norway maple Acer platanoides sycamore maple Acer pseudoplatanus common yarrow* Achillea millefolium Japanese chaff flower Achyranthes japonica Russian knapweed Acroptilon repens climbing fumitory Adlumia fungosa jointed goat grass Aegilops cylindrica goutweed Aegopodium podagraria horse chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum fool’s parsley Aethusa cynapium crested wheat grass Agropyron cristatum wheat grass Agropyron desertorum corn cockle Agrostemma githago Rhode Island bent grass Agrostis capillaris tree-of-heaven* Ailanthus altissima slender hairgrass Aira caryophyllaea Geneva bugleweed Ajuga genevensis carpet bugleweed* Ajuga reptans mimosa
    [Show full text]
  • Colletotrichum – Names in Current Use
    Online advance Fungal Diversity Colletotrichum – names in current use Hyde, K.D.1,7*, Cai, L.2, Cannon, P.F.3, Crouch, J.A.4, Crous, P.W.5, Damm, U. 5, Goodwin, P.H.6, Chen, H.7, Johnston, P.R.8, Jones, E.B.G.9, Liu, Z.Y.10, McKenzie, E.H.C.8, Moriwaki, J.11, Noireung, P.1, Pennycook, S.R.8, Pfenning, L.H.12, Prihastuti, H.1, Sato, T.13, Shivas, R.G.14, Tan, Y.P.14, Taylor, P.W.J.15, Weir, B.S.8, Yang, Y.L.10,16 and Zhang, J.Z.17 1,School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chaing Rai, Thailand 2Research & Development Centre, Novozymes, Beijing 100085, PR China 3CABI, Bakeham Lane, Egham, Surrey TW20 9TY, UK and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK 4Cereal Disease Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1551 Lindig Street, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA 5CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands 6School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada 7International Fungal Research & Development Centre, The Research Institute of Resource Insects, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Bailongsi, Kunming 650224, PR China 8Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand 9BIOTEC Bioresources Technology Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, NSTDA, 113 Thailand Science Park, Paholyothin Road, Khlong 1, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand 10Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, Guizhou 550006 PR China 11Hokuriku Research Center, National Agricultural Research Center,
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Hardwood Tree Plantings for Wildlife Brian J
    FNR-213 Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center North Central Research Station USDA Forest Service Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University Designing Hardwood Tree Plantings for Wildlife Brian J. MacGowan, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University Woody plants can be of value to many wildlife species. The species of tree or shrub, or the location, size, and shape of planting can all have an impact on wildlife. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the benefits of trees and shrubs for wildlife and how to design tree and shrub plantings for wildlife. Some of the practices may conflict with other management goals and may have to be modified for individual priorities. Trees and Shrubs for Wildlife The species you select for a tree planting should depend on the growing conditions of the site and the wildlife species that you want to manage. Talk to a professional forester to help you select the tree species best suited for your growing conditions. A professional biologist, such as a Department of Natural Resources District Biologist (www.in.gov/ food source for wildlife (Table 2). Shrubs can be dnr/fishwild/huntguide1/wbiolo.htm), can assist you particularly important because several species of with planning a tree planting for wildlife. wildlife, especially songbirds, prefer to feed or nest There is no specific formula for developing wild- on or near the ground. Shrubs also provide good life habitat. For example, acorns are eaten by a wide protective cover for these types of wildlife. Pines variety of wildlife species including tree squirrels, and other softwoods provide limited food, but are an pheasants, wild turkey, and deer.
    [Show full text]
  • (US) 38E.85. a 38E SEE", A
    USOO957398OB2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,573,980 B2 Thompson et al. (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 21, 2017 (54) FUSION PROTEINS AND METHODS FOR 7.919,678 B2 4/2011 Mironov STIMULATING PLANT GROWTH, 88: R: g: Ei. al. 1 PROTECTING PLANTS FROM PATHOGENS, 3:42: ... g3 is et al. A61K 39.00 AND MMOBILIZING BACILLUS SPORES 2003/0228679 A1 12.2003 Smith et al." ON PLANT ROOTS 2004/OO77090 A1 4/2004 Short 2010/0205690 A1 8/2010 Blä sing et al. (71) Applicant: Spogen Biotech Inc., Columbia, MO 2010/0233.124 Al 9, 2010 Stewart et al. (US) 38E.85. A 38E SEE",teWart et aal. (72) Inventors: Brian Thompson, Columbia, MO (US); 5,3542011/0321197 AllA. '55.12/2011 SE",Schön et al.i. Katie Thompson, Columbia, MO (US) 2012fO259101 A1 10, 2012 Tan et al. 2012fO266327 A1 10, 2012 Sanz Molinero et al. (73) Assignee: Spogen Biotech Inc., Columbia, MO 2014/0259225 A1 9, 2014 Frank et al. US (US) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this CA 2146822 A1 10, 1995 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 EP O 792 363 B1 12/2003 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. EP 1590466 B1 9, 2010 EP 2069504 B1 6, 2015 (21) Appl. No.: 14/213,525 WO O2/OO232 A2 1/2002 WO O306684.6 A1 8, 2003 1-1. WO 2005/028654 A1 3/2005 (22) Filed: Mar. 14, 2014 WO 2006/O12366 A2 2/2006 O O WO 2007/078127 A1 7/2007 (65) Prior Publication Data WO 2007/086898 A2 8, 2007 WO 2009037329 A2 3, 2009 US 2014/0274707 A1 Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition
    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names th 7 Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be The Internation Seed Testing Association (ISTA) reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior ©2020 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 7th Edition 2019 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori 2 7th Edition ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Content Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Symbols and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]