DOCSLIB.ORG

An Analysis of the Relevance of Deliberative Democracy, Agonistic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Analysis of the Relevance of Deliberative Democracy, Agonistic SMITH, P. 2018. An analysis of the relevance of deliberative democracy, agonistic pluralism, and pluralist group theory in explaining Twitter activity during the Scottish independence referendum 2014. Robert Gordon University [online], PhD thesis. Available from: https://openair.rgu.ac.uk An analysis of the relevance of deliberative democracy, agonistic pluralism, and pluralist group theory in explaining Twitter activity during the Scottish independence referendum 2014. SMITH, P. 2018 The author of this thesis retains the right to be identified as such on any occasion in which content from this thesis is referenced or re-used. The licence under which this thesis is distributed applies to the text and any original images only – re-use of any third-party content must still be cleared with the original copyright holder. This document was downloaded from https://openair.rgu.ac.uk An Analysis of the Relevance of Deliberative Democracy, Agonistic Pluralism, and Pluralist Group Theory in Explaining Twitter Activity During the Scottish Independence Referendum 2014 Paul Smith A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Robert Gordon University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2018 Abstract This thesis is predominantly focused upon the relevance of deliberative democracy and agonistic pluralism in helping us to understand and analyse the Scottish independence referendum of 2014, as it played out on Twitter. In doing so, it advances theoretical political communication research into social media platforms, which often focuses upon the possibilities of deliberative democracy, whilst agonistic pluralism tends to be used in opposition to deliberative theory. Aspects of liberalism and communitarianism are also used in the empirical study as an aid to this comparison, by applying a model taken from Deen G. Freelon (2010). Uniquely, in addition to activist groups, journalists and MSPs are focused upon as key stakeholders in the democratic communication process. The thesis is qualitative, with a critical theory research philosophy which focuses upon pluralism as a theory which contextualises power relations in the democratic process, underpins the vital role of media plurality in liberal democracies, and is a forerunner of agonistic theory. Methodologically, the empirical study combines an 18 month period of Twitter observation with intensive interviews (conducted with individuals from the three aforementioned stakeholder groups) in line with accepted norms of critical theory research. The empirical study makes an original contribution to knowledge by presenting rich descriptions of exemplars of three different strands of political communication taken from Freelon’s model, which could be operationalised by quantitative scholars in future studies. The empirical results suggest that whilst deliberation was negligible during the campaign, there are a number of coding schemes that when tailored to the appropriate platform are capable of capturing online deliberation. However, the process of recognising certain requisite components of deliberative exchanges is particularly challenging from remote settings. Agonistic pluralism was found to be somewhat representative of the online debate, though lacking regarding essential components of Chantal Mouffe’s version of the theory in the areas of agonistic respect and conflictual consensus. The study, therefore, concludes that a new strand of agonistic pluralism would complement existing models of political communication, and core components of such a model are discussed. The thesis has a secondary focus which asks how pluralist group theory aids our understanding of Twitter-based activism during the referendum campaign. In this regard, the study concludes that pluralist group theory is indeed still relevant in the modern day, whilst social media platforms such as Twitter are perhaps redefining traditional notions of political interest groups. Keywords: democracy, pluralism, media, Twitter, deliberation, agonism, social media | Abstract ii Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisors Peter McLaverty, Elizabeth Tait and Iain Macleod for their help throughout the PhD. Your support and skilful guidance throughout the process has been invaluable. Your patience throughout the more difficult times, along with your willingness to read and reread my work and also your unendingly constructive feedback, has been hugely appreciated. Thanks also to my fellow PhD students and staff at RGU for supporting me throughout this study. This study would not have been possible without the willingness of the research participants to take part. I owe my thanks to each and every one of them. I would like to thank them for willingly affording me generous amounts of time, often at the peak of a frantically busy referendum campaign. For Ben | Acknowledgement iii Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 OVERVIEW OF CHAPTER 1 ........................................................................................................ 10 1.2 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY ................................................................................................... 10 1.3 BACKGROUND TO THE SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM 2014 ........................................ 12 1.4 OUTLINE OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM ...................................................................................... 13 1.5 OVERVIEW OF THE THESIS ........................................................................................................ 18 2 DEMOCRACY ............................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 OVERVIEW OF CHAPTER 2 ........................................................................................................ 21 2.2 CONTEMPORARY DEMOCRACY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM ............................................................ 21 2.3 LIBERAL DEMOCRACY............................................................................................................... 31 2.4 DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY...................................................................................................... 33 2.5 AGONISTIC PLURALISM ............................................................................................................. 37 2.6 CONCLUSIONS TO CHAPTER 2 .................................................................................................. 41 3 PLURALISM ................................................................................................................................. 42 3.1 OVERVIEW OF CHAPTER 3 ........................................................................................................ 42 3.2 PLURALISM AND MONISM .......................................................................................................... 42 3.3 PLURALISM, RELATIVISM AND PRAGMATISM ............................................................................... 44 3.4 VALUE PLURALISM ................................................................................................................... 47 3.5 PLURALIST GROUP THEORY ...................................................................................................... 48 3.6 CLASSICAL PLURALISM ............................................................................................................. 51 3.7 CONTEMPORARY PLURALISM .................................................................................................... 52 3.8 CONCLUSIONS TO CHAPTER 3 .................................................................................................. 54 4 MEDIA PLURALISM ..................................................................................................................... 56 4.1 OVERVIEW OF CHAPTER 4 ....................................................................................................... 56 4.2 MEDIA IN A DEMOCRACY ........................................................................................................... 56 4.3 UK MEDIA PLURALISM AS HEADLINE NEWS ................................................................................ 58 4.4 THE LEVESON ENQUIRY ........................................................................................................... 60 4.5 PUBLIC SERVICE BROADCASTING .............................................................................................. 63 4.6 MEDIA PLURALISM – THE INTERNET AND SOCIAL MEDIA .............................................................. 65 4.7 CONCLUSIONS TO CHAPTER 4 .................................................................................................. 75 5 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................... 76 5.1 OVERVIEW OF CHAPTER 5 ........................................................................................................ 76 5.2 RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY .......................................................................................................... 76 5.3 QUALITATIVE RESEARCH .......................................................................................................... 81 | Table of Contents iv 5.4 SOCIAL MEDIA RESEARCH PARADIGM ........................................................................................ 82 5.5 RESEARCH DESIGN .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • House of Commons Official Report
    Monday Volume 650 26 November 2018 No. 212 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 26 November 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON. THERESA MAY, MP, JUNE 2017) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE DUCHY OF LANCASTER AND MINISTER FOR THE CABINET OFFICE—The Rt Hon. David Lidington, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Sajid Javid, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt. Hon Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION—The Rt Hon. Stephen Barclay, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Gavin Williamson, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. David Gauke, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE—The Rt Hon. Matt Hancock, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY—The Rt Hon. Greg Clark, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF TRADE—The Rt Hon. Liam Fox, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Amber Rudd, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Damian Hinds, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh Annual Report
    Scottish Institute for Policing Research Annual Report 2013 Cover picture © Police Scotland © Scottish Institute for Policing Research, April 2014 2 The Scottish Institute for Policing Research A 60 Second Briefing The Scottish Institute for Policing Research (SIPR) is a strategic collaboration between 12 of Scotland’s universities1 and the Scottish police service supported by investment from Police Scotland, the Scottish Funding Council and the participating universities. Our key aims are: • To undertake high quality, independent, and relevant research; • To support knowledge exchange between researchers and practitioners and improve the research evidence base for policing policy and practice; • To expand and develop the research capacity in Scotland’s universities and the police service; • To promote the development of national and international links with researcher, practitioner and policy communities. We are an interdisciplinary Institute which brings together researchers from the social sciences, natural sciences and humanities around three broad thematic areas: Police-Community Relations; Evidence & Investigation; and Police Organization; We promote a collaborative approach to research that involves academics and practitioners working together in the creation, sharing and application of knowledge about policing; Our activities are coordinated by an Executive Committee comprising academic researchers and chief police officers, and we are accountable to a Board of Governance which includes the Principals of the participating universities
    [Show full text]
  • Stewart2019.Pdf
    Political Change and Scottish Nationalism in Dundee 1973-2012 Thomas A W Stewart PhD Thesis University of Edinburgh 2019 Abstract Prior to the 2014 independence referendum, the Scottish National Party’s strongest bastions of support were in rural areas. The sole exception was Dundee, where it has consistently enjoyed levels of support well ahead of the national average, first replacing the Conservatives as the city’s second party in the 1970s before overcoming Labour to become its leading force in the 2000s. Through this period it achieved Westminster representation between 1974 and 1987, and again since 2005, and had won both of its Scottish Parliamentary seats by 2007. This performance has been completely unmatched in any of the country’s other cities. Using a mixture of archival research, oral history interviews, the local press and memoires, this thesis seeks to explain the party’s record of success in Dundee. It will assess the extent to which the character of the city itself, its economy, demography, geography, history, and local media landscape, made Dundee especially prone to Nationalist politics. It will then address the more fundamental importance of the interaction of local political forces that were independent of the city’s nature through an examination of the ability of party machines, key individuals and political strategies to shape the city’s electoral landscape. The local SNP and its main rival throughout the period, the Labour Party, will be analysed in particular detail. The thesis will also take time to delve into the histories of the Conservatives, Liberals and Radical Left within the city and their influence on the fortunes of the SNP.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Parliament Elections: 1 May 2003 14.05.03
    RESEARCH PAPER 03/46 Scottish Parliament 14 MAY 2003 Elections: 1 May 2003 This paper provides summary and detailed results of the second elections to the Scottish Parliament which took place on 1 May 2003. The paper provides data on voting trends and electoral turnout for constituencies, electoral regions and for Scotland as a whole. This paper is a companion volume to Library Research Papers 03/45 Welsh Assembly Elections and 03/44 Local Elections 2003. Matthew Leeke & Richard Cracknell SOCIAL & GENERAL STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers 03/32 Parliamentary Questions, Debate Contributions and Participation in 31.03.03 Commons Divisions 03/33 Economic Indicators [includes article: Changes to National Insurance 01.04.03 Contributions, April 2003] 03/34 The Anti-Social Behaviour Bill [Bill 83 of 2002-03] 04.04.03 03/35 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2003-04-11 10.04.03 03/36 Unemployment by Constituency, March 2003 17.04.03 03/37 Economic Indicators [includes article: The current WTO trade round] 01.05.03 03/38 NHS Foundation Trusts in the Health and Social Care 01.05.03 (Community Health and Standards) Bill [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/39 Social Care Aspects of the Health and Social Care (Community Health 02.05.03 and Standards Bill) [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/40 Social Indicators 06.05.03 03/41 The Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) 06.05.03 Bill: Health aspects other than NHS Foundation Trusts [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/42 The Fire Services Bill [Bill 81 of 2002-03] 07.05.03 03/43
    [Show full text]
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure
    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Members of Parliament from All Political Parties Support a Reduction in Tourism VAT
    MP SUPPORTER LIST, AUTUMN/WINTER 2016-2017 Members of Parliament from all political parties support a reduction in tourism VAT Name Type Party Name Type Party Mr Alun Cairns MP Conservative Mr George Howarth MP Labour Mr Andrew Bingham MP Conservative Mr Gerald Jones MP Labour Mr Andrew Bridgen MP Conservative Mr Gordon Marsden MP Labour Mr Andrew Turner MP Conservative Mr Ian Austin MP Labour Ms Anne-Marie Morris MP Conservative Ms Jessica Morden MP Labour Mr Ben Howlett MP Conservative Mr Jim Cunningham MP Labour Mr Byron Davies MP Conservative Mr Jim Dowd MP Labour Ms Caroline Ansell MP Conservative Ms Jo Stevens MP Labour Mrs Caroline Spelman MP Conservative Mr Justin Madders MP Labour Ms Charlotte Leslie MP Conservative Ms Kate Hoey MP Labour Mr Chris Davies MP Conservative Ms Mary Glindon MP Labour Mr Christopher Pincher MP Conservative Mr Paul Flynn MP Labour Mr Conor Burns MP Conservative Mr Robert Flello MP Labour Mr Craig Williams MP Conservative Mr Roger Godsiff MP Labour Mr Craig Tracey MP Conservative Mr Ronnie Campbell MP Labour Mr David Nuttall MP Conservative Mr Stephen Hepburn MP Labour Mr David Jones MP Conservative Mr Steve Rotheram MP Labour Mr David Davis MP Conservative Mr Steven Kinnock MP Labour Mr David Morris MP Conservative Mr Tom Blenkinsop MP Labour Mr Geoffrey Cox MP Conservative Mr Virendra Sharma MP Labour Mr Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP Conservative Ms Yasmin Qureshi MP Labour Mr George Freeman MP Conservative Mr Alistair Carmichael MP Liberal Democrat Sir Gerald Howarth MP Conservative Mr Greg Mulholland
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Independence Referendum Report on the Referendum Held on 18 September 2014
    Scottish Independence Referendum Report on the referendum held on 18 September 2014 December 2014 ELC/2014/02 This report is laid before the Scottish Parliament in pursuance of Section 27 of the Scottish Independence Referendum Act 2013. ELC/2014/02 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large- print or Braille version please contact the Electoral Commission: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] We are an independent body set up by the UK Parliament. We regulate party and election finance and set standards for well-run elections. We work to support a healthy democracy, where elections and referendums are based on our principles of trust, participation, and no undue influence. The Scottish Independence Referendum Act 2013 gave the Commission a number of responsibilities for the referendum, for which we report directly to the Scottish Parliament. Contents Foreword 1 Executive Summary 4 1 Introduction 22 2 The referendum legislation 28 3 Information for voters about the referendum 42 4 The experience of voters 58 5 Campaigning at the referendum 82 6 Was the referendum well-run? 119 7 The cost of the referendum 145 Appendices Appendix 1 - Research methodology 150 Appendix 2 - List of registered campaigners 151 Appendix 3 - Summary of referendum results 152 Appendix 4 - Electoral Commission Voting Guide 154 Foreword As part of the legislation passed by the Scottish Parliament enabling the historic referendum on independence for Scotland on 18 September 2014, the Electoral Commission was tasked with producing a report on the conduct of the referendum and our associated expenditure.
    [Show full text]
  • Donations and Loans Received by Campaigners at the Referendum on Independence for Scotland (Pre-Poll Reporting: 18 December 2013 to 24 July 2014)
    Donations and loans received by campaigners at the referendum on independence for Scotland (pre-poll reporting: 18 December 2013 to 24 July 2014) The Scottish Independence Referendum Act 2013 requires registered campaigners (that are not political parties) to complete pre-poll reports setting out what donations and loans over £7,500 they have received between commencement of the Act (18 December 2013) and 5 September 2014. Date Electoral Deadline for pre- Reporting period Commission will poll reports publish donations 18 December 2013 to 26 Thursday 3 July Tuesday 8 July June 2014 27 June to 24 July Thursday 31 July Tuesday 5 August 25 July to 21 August Thursday 28 August Tuesday 2 September Friday 12 22 August to 5 September Monday 15 September September This document is a summary of donations and borrowing reported to us in the second reporting period, 27 June 2014 to 24 July. After the referendum has taken place, registered campaigners will have to report: all donations and loans over £7,500 that they accepted their campaign spending during the referendum period (30 May 2014 up to and including polling day, 18 September 2014 - the period where campaigners are limited in how much they can spend) Please see our media handbook for more information: http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/166556/S cottish-Independence-Referendum-media-handbook.pdf Read our news release on the pre-poll donations and loans at: http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am-a/journalist/electoral-commission- media-centre/news-releases-donations/second-pre-poll-donations-and-loans-
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Official Report Parliamentary
    Thursday Volume 664 26 September 2019 No. 343 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 26 September 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 843 26 SEPTEMBER 2019 Speaker’s Statement 844 there will be an urgent question later today on the House of Commons matter to which I have just referred, and that will be an opportunity for colleagues to say what they think. This is something of concern across the House. It is Thursday 26 September 2019 not a party political matter and, certainly as far as I am concerned, it should not be in any way, at any time, to any degree a matter for partisan point scoring. It is The House met at half-past Nine o’clock about something bigger than an individual, an individual party or an individual political or ideological viewpoint. Let us treat of it on that basis. In the meantime, may I just ask colleagues—that is all I am doing and all I can PRAYERS do as your representative in the Chair—please to lower the decibel level and to try to treat each other as opponents, not as enemies? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Sir Peter Bottomley (Worthing West) (Con): On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Speaker’s Statement Mr Speaker: Order. I genuinely am not convinced, but I will take one point of order if the hon. Gentleman Mr Speaker: Before we get under way with today’s insists.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland Management Review 2009/10
    SCOTLAND MANAGEMENT REVIEW 2009/10 A INTRODUCTION FROM NATIONAL DIRECTOR A DIFFICULT AND CHALLENGING YEAR HAS, HOWEVER, ALSO BEEN ONE OF TREMENDOUS ACHIEVEMENT, CHARACTERISED BY LANDMARK PROGRAMMES AND INCREASED BBC INVESTMENT IN BROADCASTING IN SCOTLAND. Audiences are at the heart of all of our broadcasting and, across 2009/2010, we looked to ensure that the many diverse needs and tastes of our viewers and listeners were met, on television, radio and online. Across the month of September the This is Scotland season on BBC Four showcased the best of our nation’s culture, arts and music before a UK audience and the second part of Scotland’s History broadcast to critical acclaim at the turn of the year, on BBC One Scotland, network and on the BBC HD channel. Our news teams continued to bring the best local, national and international journalism to radio, television and online audiences across Scotland, from local reporting on the winter weather chaos “AGAINST A DIFFICULT FINANCIAL BACKDROP, BBC to coverage of the release of the Lockerbie bomber, which brought with it a prestigious Royal NETWORK BUSINESS IN SCOTLAND HAS CONTINUED Television Society award. The BBC’s Network Supply Review saw several key programmes transfer to Scotland during the TO INCREASE, AND WE ARE NOW STARTING TO course of the year. The Review Show and The Weakest Link both began filming in our studios atP acific REALISE THE FULL POTENTIAL OF OUR DIGITAL Quay in Glasgow. They joined a slate of new productions, across genres, which have helped boost BBC network investment in Scotland to over 6% of the total BBC spend, meeting the 2012 target TELEVISION AND RADIO STUDIOS AT PACIFIC QUAY set for us in 2007 by the Director-General and the BBC Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK's Nuclear Deterrent and Post-Devolution Scotland
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Centre for British Studies Supervisor: Prof. Gerhard Dannemann Master Thesis The UK’s Nuclear Deterrent and Post-Devolution Scotland: Legal, Political and Economic Implications Julia Floren Landsberger Allee 22 10249 Berlin E-Mail: [email protected] Contents List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 2 1 The UK’s Nuclear Deterrent and Scotland: From the Cold War to Post-Devolution ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 The UK’s Nuclear Policy: Continuity and Change ................................. 6 1.2 Scotland as the Home of the UK’s Nuclear Force: Geography Matters ....................................................................................................... 8 1.2.1 The US Base at Holy Loch .................................................................... 8 1.2.2 Polaris and Trident at Faslane and Coulport ...................................... 9 1.3 Current Capabilities and Trident Renewal ............................................ 10 2 The Legal Perspective ................................................................................... 13 2.1 The Legality of Trident under International Law ................................. 13 2.2 The Effects of Devolution on Trident ..................................................... 17 2.2.1
    [Show full text]