DOCSLIB.ORG

House of Commons Official Report Parliamentary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Thursday Volume 664 26 September 2019 No. 343 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 26 September 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 843 26 SEPTEMBER 2019 Speaker’s Statement 844 there will be an urgent question later today on the House of Commons matter to which I have just referred, and that will be an opportunity for colleagues to say what they think. This is something of concern across the House. It is Thursday 26 September 2019 not a party political matter and, certainly as far as I am concerned, it should not be in any way, at any time, to any degree a matter for partisan point scoring. It is The House met at half-past Nine o’clock about something bigger than an individual, an individual party or an individual political or ideological viewpoint. Let us treat of it on that basis. In the meantime, may I just ask colleagues—that is all I am doing and all I can PRAYERS do as your representative in the Chair—please to lower the decibel level and to try to treat each other as opponents, not as enemies? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Sir Peter Bottomley (Worthing West) (Con): On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Speaker’s Statement Mr Speaker: Order. I genuinely am not convinced, but I will take one point of order if the hon. Gentleman Mr Speaker: Before we get under way with today’s insists. I am not sure how helpful it will be, but let us see. business, including a number of urgent questions and statements, I just want to say a few words to the House. Sir Peter Bottomley: Would it be helpful for the I think there is a widespread sense across the House and House to know the subjects of the other urgent questions beyond that, yesterday, the House did itself no credit. and statements, please? There was an atmosphere in the Chamber worse than Mr Speaker: I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman. any I have known in my 22 years in the House. On both The first urgent question is from the hon. Member for sides, passions were inflamed, angry words were uttered Edinburgh South (Ian Murray) on the subject of the and the culture was toxic. This country faces the most European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019. The challenging political issue that we have grappled with in issues will play out, but it is about compliance with decades. There are genuine, heartfelt, sincerely subscribed the Act. It is a perfectly reasonable question from the to differences of opinion about that matter. Members hon. Gentleman. The second is from the hon. Member must be free to express themselves about it and to for Hornsey and Wood Green (Catherine West) on the display, as they unfailingly do, the courage of their situation in Hong Kong. The third is from Mr Chris convictions. It ought, however, to be possible to disagree Law on the subject of arms export licences to Saudi agreeably, and I can see Members on both sides of the Arabia. The fourth urgent question, to which I perhaps House who are fine exponents of that principle and slightly elliptically referred, is from the hon. Member tradition. Yesterday, that was not the majority strain, I for Birmingham, Yardley (Jess Phillips) on the matter am sorry to say. of the toxicity of our political culture and the need to I have, overnight, received an approach from two take appropriate steps to minimise that toxicity and very senior Members on either side of the House pressing conduce to a better atmosphere. the case for a formal consideration of our political The statement from the Secretary of State for Business, culture going forward. Manifestly, any such formal Energy and Industrial Strategy is on the subject of structure—any such conference, deliberation—would international climate action at the United Nations climate not take place under my aegis. Like everybody else here, action summit. There will also be a further business I just want what is best for the House.Pending consideration statement, of which we had notice last night, from the of that approach and the argument for having a sober Leader of the House. I hope that has satisfied the consideration of the issue of political culture and conduct legitimate inquisitorial appetite of the hon. Member for over an ongoing period, I can advise the House that Worthing West (Sir Peter Bottomley). 845 26 SEPTEMBER 2019 Compliance with the European Union 846 (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 Compliance with the European Union Mr Speaker,thank you for granting this urgent question. (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 The European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act was passed by the House and given Royal Assent by Her Majesty the Queen on Monday 9 September and brought 9.41 am in the names of my right hon. Friend the Member for Ian Murray (Edinburgh South) (Lab) (Urgent Question): Leeds Central (Hilary Benn) and the right hon. Member I am happy to have been slightly delayed by an actual for North East Bedfordshire (Alistair Burt). That Act point of order. My urgent question is to ask the Prime clearly says that the Prime Minister must seek an extension Minister to make a statement on compliance with the to article 50 to 31 January if the Prime Minister is European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019. unable to meet one of the two conditions of either having a withdrawal deal passed by this House, or The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Exiting having an affirmative vote by this House to back no the European Union (James Duddridge): In the tone that deal. you are setting, Mr Speaker, perhaps I may refer to a The Minister said in his opening response that there Member incorrectly and thank my hon. Friend, because was a range of options. That is the only range of there are many friends across the Chamber. If one reads options in that Bill—to pass a deal, to pass no deal, or the newspapers this morning, there is a feeling that we subsequently to seek an extension. The Supreme Court are permanently adversarial and at war with one another. decision this week and the statement in this House That is not the case. Many of us work together bilaterally followed by questioning of the Prime Minister yesterday in groups and Committees in this House, and most of were a national embarrassment. Under any other political the time on the Floor of the House we work in a equilibrium, this Prime Minister would have seriously consensual nature. considered his position as Prime Minister, and potentially Turning to this important urgent question, the resigned from it. Many people have lost their jobs in Government will obey the law. That has always been the government for a fraction of what this Prime Minister case. The House has heard that from the Prime Minister; has done over the last two weeks. it has heard it from the First Secretary of State, my Yesterday, the Attorney General, at that Dispatch right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary; it has heard it Box, during the urgent question tabled by my hon. and from the Lord Chancellor, who has constitutional learned Friend the Member for Edinburgh South West responsibility for upholding the rule of law; and yesterday (Joanna Cherry), said clearly, in answer to a question by right hon. and hon. Members had the opportunity to my hon. Friend the Member for Grantham and Stamford put similar questions to the Attorney General. (Nick Boles), that he would abide by the law of the EU The Government opposed the Act that was passed (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019. He said that with earlier this month. Notwithstanding our fervent attempts uncharacteristic clarity when he said simply, “Yes” in to resist the passage of the Bill, even its architects must response to that question. Last night, the hon. Members accept that the Act makes provision for a potential for North East Fife (Stephen Gethins) and for Paisley range of outcomes, not one outcome. The outcome the and Renfrewshire North (Gavin Newlands) and many Government want—the outcome this Government have others pressed the Prime Minister to make the same always wanted—is a deal with the European Union. commitment. He did not give the same commitment in That deal can deliver the mandate of the British people. this House. And under questioning from myself, very That deal is possible and is now within reach. late in the sitting last night, when I asked whether he would fully comply with the provisions of the Act, My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for should he not get a deal through this House, or an Exiting the European Union, along with the Prime affirmative vote for no deal, by 19 October, the Prime Minister’s negotiating team, has been engaged in Minister answered with one word: he answered, “No.” constructive negotiations. As the Prime Minister told this place yesterday, we were told that Brussels would I have tabled this urgent question, first, to seek clarity; never reopen the withdrawal agreement, but we are now and secondly, to ask the Minister, in all good faith, to discussing reopening the withdrawal agreement in detail. tell us, which he has not done yet, what the Prime While I appreciate that some may seek to anticipate Minister meant when he said “No,” because frankly, failure, to frustrate from the sidelines or to speculate for and with reference to my earlier remarks about respect some type of sport, this Government will not indulge in across this House, I am sure that there are very few defeatism.
Recommended publications
  • Monday 11 January 2021 CONSIDERATION of LORDS

    Monday 11 January 2021 CONSIDERATION of LORDS

    1 House of Commons NOTICES OF AMENDMENTS given up to and including Monday 11 January 2021 CONSIDERATION OF LORDS AMENDMENTS FIRE SAFETY BILL On Consideration of Lords Amendments to the Fire Safety Bill Lords Amendment No. 4 As an Amendment to the Lords Amendment:— Daisy Cooper Ed Davey Tim Farron Wendy Chamberlain Mr Alistair Carmichael Wera Hobhouse Christine Jardine Layla Moran Sarah Olney Jamie Stone Munira Wilson Caroline Lucas (e) Line 5, leave out subsection (2) and insert— “(2) The owner of a building may not pass the costs of any remedial work referred to in subsection (1) through the request of increased service payments from the leaseholders or tenants of that building. (3) The owner of a building shall reimburse leaseholders for the proportion of increased service payments that have been collected since 17 June 2017 for the purposes of covering remedial works referred to in subsection (1). (4) This section does not apply to a leaseholder who is also the owner or part owner of the freehold of the building.” 2 Consideration of Lords Amendments: 11 January 2021 Fire Safety Bill, continued Stephen McPartland Royston Smith Mr Philip Hollobone Mr John Baron Caroline Nokes Bob Blackman Richard Graham Damian Green Anne Marie Morris Tom Tugendhat Andrew Selous Tom Hunt Sir David Amess Andrew Rosindell Henry Smith Sir Robert Neill Nick Fletcher Elliot Colburn Sir Mike Penning Mr William Wragg Mr Virendra Sharma Stephen Hammond David Warburton Richard Fuller Sir Roger Gale Tracey Crouch Paul Blomfield Dr Matthew Offord To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.
  • Constitutional Authority and Its Limitations: the Politics of Sexuality in South Africa

    Constitutional Authority and Its Limitations: the Politics of Sexuality in South Africa

    South Africa Constitutional Authority and its Limitations: The Politics of Sexuality in South Africa Belinda Beresford Helen Schneider Robert Sember Vagner Almeida “While the newly enfranchised have much to gain by supporting their government, they also have much to lose.” Adebe Zegeye (2001) A history of the future: Constitutional rights South Africa’s Constitutional Court is housed in an architecturally innovative complex on Constitution Hill, a 100-acre site in central Johannesburg. The site is adjacent to Hillbrow, a neighborhood of high-rise apartment buildings into which are crowded thousands of mi- grants from across the country and the continent. This is one of the country’s most densely populated, cosmopolitan and severely blighted urban areas. From its position atop Constitu- tion Hill, the Court offers views of Hillbrow’s high-rises and the distant northern suburbs where the established white elite and increasing numbers of newly affluent non-white South Africans live. Thus, while the light-filled, colorful and contemporary Constitutional Court buildings reflect the progressive and optimistic vision of post-apartheid South Africa the lo- cation is a reminder of the deeply entrenched inequalities that continue to define the rights of the majority of people in the country and the continent. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY AND ITS LIMITATIONS: THE POLITICS OF SEXUALITY IN SOUTH AFRICA 197 From the late 1800s to 1983 Constitution Hill was the location of Johannesburg’s central prison, the remains of which now lie in the shadow of the new court buildings. Former prison buildings include a fort built by the Boers (descendents of Dutch settlers) in the late 1800s to defend themselves against the thousands of men and women who arrived following the discovery of the area’s expansive gold deposits.
  • Register of Interests of Members’ Secretaries and Research Assistants

    Register of Interests of Members’ Secretaries and Research Assistants

    REGISTER OF INTERESTS OF MEMBERS’ SECRETARIES AND RESEARCH ASSISTANTS (As at 11 July 2018) INTRODUCTION Purpose and Form of the Register In accordance with Resolutions made by the House of Commons on 17 December 1985 and 28 June 1993, holders of photo-identity passes as Members’ secretaries or research assistants are in essence required to register: ‘Any occupation or employment for which you receive over £380 from the same source in the course of a calendar year, if that occupation or employment is in any way advantaged by the privileged access to Parliament afforded by your pass. Any gift (eg jewellery) or benefit (eg hospitality, services) that you receive, if the gift or benefit in any way relates to or arises from your work in Parliament and its value exceeds £380 in the course of a calendar year.’ In Section 1 of the Register entries are listed alphabetically according to the staff member’s surname. Section 2 contains exactly the same information but entries are instead listed according to the sponsoring Member’s name. Administration and Inspection of the Register The Register is compiled and maintained by the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Anyone whose details are entered on the Register is required to notify that office of any change in their registrable interests within 28 days of such a change arising. An updated edition of the Register is published approximately every 6 weeks when the House is sitting. Changes to the rules governing the Register are determined by the Committee on Standards in the House of Commons, although where such changes are substantial they are put by the Committee to the House for approval before being implemented.
  • Decarbonising Aid: Why We Must Stop UK Financing for Fossil Fuels Overseas Table 1: CDC’S Direct Investments in Fossil Fuel Infrastructure

    Decarbonising Aid: Why We Must Stop UK Financing for Fossil Fuels Overseas Table 1: CDC’S Direct Investments in Fossil Fuel Infrastructure

    Campaign briefing Decarbonising aid Why we must stop UK financing for fossil fuels overseas May 2020 Photo: decoalonize.org CC: BY-NC-SA 2.0 Environmental activists in Kenya are determined to show that coal has no place in the country’s energy future. Why aid for fossil fuels must end • These investments are only one part of UK public financing for fossil fuels overseas which undermine • The world has ten years to decarbonise the global the government’s national commitments on economy and limit global temperature rises to emissions reductions. Since the Paris Agreement O 1.5 C – the target set by the Paris Agreement in was signed, approximately £568 million of UK aid 2015. This is an absolutely crucial demand for has been invested in fossil fuel projects overseas. frontline communities whose lands and livelihoods If we include export credits provided by UK Export will be destroyed by climate breakdown. Finance (UKEF) for fossil fuels, that number rises to • The UK government argues that investing in oil and £3.9 billion. gas is a good medium-term alternative to coal • Despite claims to be supporting a transition to power for countries in the global south. However, cleaner energy, CDC has £213 million of active this argument has been thoroughly debunked as investments in projects using the most polluting it will create fossil fuel dependency and lock in fuels, including diesel and heavy fuel oil.2 In 1 high carbon emissions for generations to come. countries including Ghana, CDC’s projects are also • UK aid is legally required to be spent on poverty contributing to the privatisation of energy systems, reduction.
  • Appointments to South Africa's Constitutional Court Since 1994

    Appointments to South Africa's Constitutional Court Since 1994

    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 15 July 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Johnson, Rachel E. (2014) 'Women as a sign of the new? Appointments to the South Africa's Constitutional Court since 1994.', Politics gender., 10 (4). pp. 595-621. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000439 Publisher's copyright statement: c Copyright The Women and Politics Research Section of the American 2014. This paper has been published in a revised form, subsequent to editorial input by Cambridge University Press in 'Politics gender' (10: 4 (2014) 595-621) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PAG Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Rachel E. Johnson, Politics & Gender, Vol. 10, Issue 4 (2014), pp 595-621. Women as a Sign of the New? Appointments to South Africa’s Constitutional Court since 1994.
  • Questions Tabled on Tuesday 6 July 2021

    Questions Tabled on Tuesday 6 July 2021

    Published: Wednesday 7 July 2021 Questions tabled on Tuesday 6 July 2021 Includes questions tabled on earlier days which have been transferred. T Indicates a topical oral question. Members are selected by ballot to ask a Topical Question. † Indicates a Question not included in the random selection process but accepted because the quota for that day had not been filled. N Indicates a question for written answer on a named day under S.O. No. 22(4). [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Wednesday 7 July Questions for Written Answer 1 Ruth Jones (Newport West): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he has had discussions with the Welsh Government on the potential merits of setting a target for marine energy ahead of COP26. [Transferred] (27308) 2 Ruth Jones (Newport West): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he has had discussions with the Scottish Government on the potential merits of setting a target for marine energy ahead of COP26. [Transferred] (27309) 3 Ruth Jones (Newport West): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he has had discussions with the Northern Ireland Executive on the potential merits of setting a target for marine energy ahead of COP26. [Transferred] (27310) 4 Navendu Mishra (Stockport): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, if she will consult with groups representing blind and partially- sighted people on the potential merits of reforming the safety information wording contained in household appliance instructions, previously governed by EU law, to make that information more inclusive.
  • Appointment of the Chair of the Social Mobility Commission

    Appointment of the Chair of the Social Mobility Commission

    House of Commons Education Committee Appointment of the Chair of the Social Mobility Commission Fourth Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 11 July 2018 HC 1048 Published on 13 July 2018 by authority of the House of Commons The Education Committee The Education Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Education and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Robert Halfon MP (Conservative, Harlow) (Chair) Lucy Allan MP (Conservative, Telford) Michelle Donelan MP (Conservative, Chippenham) Marion Fellows MP (Scottish National Party, Motherwell and Wishaw) James Frith MP (Labour, Bury North) Emma Hardy MP (Labour, Kingston upon Hull West and Hessle) Trudy Harrison MP (Conservative, Copeland) Ian Mearns MP (Labour, Gateshead) Lucy Powell MP (Labour (Co-op), Manchester Central) Thelma Walker MP (Labour, Colne Valley) Mr William Wragg MP (Conservative, Hazel Grove) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/education-committee and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Richard Ward (Clerk), Katya Cassidy (Second Clerk), Anna Connell-Smith (Committee Specialist), Chloë Cockett (Committee Specialist), Tommer Spence (Inquiry Manager), Jonathan Arkless (Senior Committee Assistant), Hajera Begum (Committee Apprentice), Gary Calder (Senior Media Officer) and Oliver Florence (Media Officer).
  • Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA

    Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA

    Wednesday 11 January 2017 Order Paper No.89: Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA: CHAMBER 11.30am Prayers Afterwards Oral Questions: International Development 12 noon Oral Questions: Prime Minister 12.30pm Urgent Questions, Ministerial Statements (if any) Up to 20 minutes Ten Minute Rule Motion: Guardianship (Missing Persons) (Kevin Hollinrake) Until 7.00pm Opposition Day: NHS and social care funding No debate Statutory Instruments (Motions for approval) No debate Presentation of Public Petitions Until 7.30pm or for Adjournment Debate: A&E provision in Shropshire and Mid Wales half an hour (Daniel Kawczynski) WESTMINSTER HALL 9.30am Pharmacies and integrated healthcare in England 11.00am Asylum seekers and the right to work (The sitting will be suspended from 11.30am to 2.30pm.) 2.30pm Access to justice 4.00pm Musculoskeletal services in Greenwich 4.30pm Funding of the Crown Prosecution Service 2 Wednesday 11 January 2017 OP No.89: Part 1 CONTENTS PART 1: BUSINESS TODAY 3 Chamber 8 Westminster Hall 9 Written Statements 10 Committees meeting today 15 Announcements 17 Further Information PART 2: FUTURE BUSINESS 20 A. Calendar of Business 37 B. Remaining Orders and Notices Notes: Items marked [R] indicates that a Member has declared a relevant interest. Wednesday 11 January 2017 OP No.89: Part 1 BUSINESS TODAY: CHAMBER 3 BUSINESS TODAY: CHAMBER 11.30am Prayers Followed by QUESTIONS Oral Questions to the Secretary of State for International Development 1 Nigel Mills (Amber Valley) What recent assessment she has made of the effectiveness of her Department's work in Tajikistan. (907997) 2 Louise Haigh (Sheffield, Heeley) What assessment she has made of the implications of demolitions in the Occupied Palestinian Territories in 2015-16 for her Department's policies in that region.
  • Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry

    Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry

    House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry Eleventh Report of Session 2005–06 Report and Appendix, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 27 June 2006 HC 1367 Published on 28 June 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee on Standards & Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt Hon Sir George Young Bt MP (Conservative, North West Hampshire) (Chairman) Rt Hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton & Ripon) Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) Nick Harvey MP (Liberal Democrat, North Devon) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Elfyn Llwyd MP (Plaid Cymru, Meirionnydd Nant Conwy) Mr Chris Mullin MP (Labour, Sunderland South) The Hon Nicholas Soames MP (Conservative, Mid Sussex) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No.
  • The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA

    The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA

    The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA Dear Prime Minister, We are writing to you as a group of cross-party parliamentarians to express our grave concern over the contents of US President Donald Trump’s so-called ‘peace plan’ for Israel and the Palestinians. The plan presented on 28 January shows contempt for the rights of the Palestinian people and international law, and provides no realistic basis for a return to negotiations. Instead, it makes peace less likely, and threatens to undermine a fundamental principle of the post-WWII international legal order: the prohibition of annexation and territorial conquest. The long-standing position of the UK is that a negotiated peace settlement must be agreed to achieve a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders, leading to a safe and secure Israel living alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state that has secure and recognised borders, and with Jerusalem as a shared capital of both states. The vision presented by the US administration is one where Palestinians would have none of these: no true shared capital in Jerusalem, no sovereign control of its borders or security, and with Israeli control far beyond the Green Line. As a group of 16 UK charities warned this week: “if implemented [the plan] will lead to the formal annexation of Palestinian land, perpetual Israeli occupation, and the negation of Palestinians’ collective right to self-determination.” It is a plan that the Palestinians have no choice but to reject if they wish to maintain their fundamental rights, but that they will be punished for not accepting.
  • FCO Annual Report & Accounts 2016

    FCO Annual Report & Accounts 2016

    Annual Report & Accounts: 2016 - 2017 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 (For the year ended 31 March 2017) Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Annual Report presented to the House of Commons by Command of Her Majesty Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 6 July 2017 HC 15 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Finance Directorate, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH Print ISBN 9781474142991 Web ISBN 9781474143004 ID P002873310 07/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Designed in-house by the FCO Communication Directorate Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report and Accounts 2016 - 2017 - Contents Contents Foreword by the Foreign Secretary ......................................................................................... 1 Executive
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely

    Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely

    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS