DOCSLIB.ORG

Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry House of Commons Committee on Standards and Privileges Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry Eleventh Report of Session 2005–06 Report and Appendix, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 27 June 2006 HC 1367 Published on 28 June 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee on Standards & Privileges The Committee on Standards and Privileges is appointed by the House of Commons to oversee the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards; to examine the arrangements proposed by the Commissioner for the compilation, maintenance and accessibility of the Register of Members’ Interests and any other registers of interest established by the House; to review from time to time the form and content of those registers; to consider any specific complaints made in relation to the registering or declaring of interests referred to it by the Commissioner; to consider any matter relating to the conduct of Members, including specific complaints in relation to alleged breaches in the Code of Conduct which have been drawn to the Committee’s attention by the Commissioner; and to recommend any modifications to the Code of Conduct as may from time to time appear to be necessary. Current membership Rt Hon Sir George Young Bt MP (Conservative, North West Hampshire) (Chairman) Rt Hon Kevin Barron MP (Labour, Rother Valley) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton & Ripon) Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) Nick Harvey MP (Liberal Democrat, North Devon) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Elfyn Llwyd MP (Plaid Cymru, Meirionnydd Nant Conwy) Mr Chris Mullin MP (Labour, Sunderland South) The Hon Nicholas Soames MP (Conservative, Mid Sussex) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in Standing Order No. 149. In particular, the Committee has power to order the attendance of any Member of Parliament before the committee and to require that specific documents or records in the possession of a Member relating to its inquiries, or to the inquiries of the Commissioner, be laid before the Committee. The Committee has power to refuse to allow its public proceedings to be broadcast. The Law Officers, if they are Members of Parliament, may attend and take part in the Committee’s proceedings, but may not vote. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at: www.parliament.uk/sandp. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Dr Christopher Ward (Clerk), Miss Libby Preston (Second Clerk) and Miss Michelle Owens (Secretary). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to The Clerk of the Committee on Standards and Privileges, Journal Office, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6615. Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry 1 Contents Report Page Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry 3 Appendix: Memorandum from the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 5 Formal minutes 37 Reports from the Committee on Standards and Privileges in the current Parliament 38 Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry 3 Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry 1. We have considered a memorandum by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards relating to a complaint made in March 2006 by the Leader of Islington Council, Councillor Steve Hitchins, against Ms Emily Thornberry, Member for Islington South and Finsbury. The Commissioner’s memorandum is reproduced in the Appendix. 2. As the Commissioner explains in his memorandum, the complaint is that Ms Thornberry altered an electronic copy of an Electoral Commission news release by inserting a quotation from herself before forwarding it to the news media in a form which suggested that it remained an official Commission release. Councillor Hitchins also asserted that Ms Thornberry was attempting, in the quotation, to associate the Commission with a party-political campaign by her and local Labour Party members on the record of Islington’s Liberal Democrat administration on electoral matters. 3. Prior to considering the Commissioner’s memorandum, we invited Ms Thornberry’s comments on it. She has indicated to us that she did not wish to submit any further evidence. 4. As the Commissioner points out, there is, in essence, no dispute about the facts underlying the complaint. Ms Thornberry accepts that she had added a quotation from herself to the body of an Electoral Commission press release which it had sent to local newspapers in Islington, and had then sent the new text to the same papers under cover of an e-mail from herself. The dispute lies over how the facts, and Ms Thornberry’s actions in particular, are to be interpreted. 5. Councillor Hitchins, as the terms of his complaint demonstrate, clearly attributed a partisan political motive to them, and in particular to the involvement, on Ms Thornberry’s initiative, of Councillor West in the Electoral Commission photocall. It is perhaps unfortunate that the Electoral Commission, as it now recognises, was not then fully aware of the sensitivity of registration issues in Islington, and thus issued, with its press release, a supporting photograph which included Councillor West, rather than just the two Islington Members of Parliament.1 6. This issue is, however, peripheral to the main issue, which is whether by adding, without the approval of the Electoral Commission, a quotation from herself to a Commission press release which it had sent to the local press, and sending the new version to the press herself, Ms Thornberry breached the Code of Conduct. 7. There is no doubt that the appearance, in what was apparently an official Electoral Commission press release, of a quotation from a Labour Member of Parliament, raised doubts, at least in Councillor Hitchins’ mind, as to the impartiality of the Electoral Commission in relation to a politically sensitive issue in Islington. The precise nature of 1 WE12, p. 35. 4 Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry her comment, which he saw as misleading, enhanced these doubts. The Electoral Commission, for its part, did not consider her action acceptable: it would have expected any comment to be included in a Commission press release to be cleared with it beforehand. It also considered that the quote was “misleading”.2 8. Ms Thornberry maintains that her primary motive in adding the quotation was to support the Electoral Commission’s campaign to improve response rates. The quotation was not in her view misleading. Her purpose in adding it was to increase local press interest in the Electoral Commission’s release. She saw her added quotation as enhancing the prospect of the press release being of sufficient interest to the local press to merit publication. She accepts, though, that it would have been better if she had spoken to the Electoral Commission before acting as she did, and told the Commissioner that she has now altered her office procedures to ensure that a similar situation does not arise in future. We welcome this. 9. In the event, neither the Electoral Commission’s press release, nor the version sent by Ms Thornberry appears to have been used by the local newspapers in Islington. There also appears to have been very limited coverage by them of Councillor Hitchins’ complaint. 10. We accept, as the Commissioner did, that Ms Thornberry’s primary motive was to support the Electoral Commission’s campaign to improve response rates, and consequently levels of voter registration, in Islington, which is self-evidently in the public interest. We agree with him, though, that she was at the least unwise, as she now accepts, to add her quotation to the Commission’s release without its permission. As he said, her actions “are not to be condoned”.3 11. The Commissioner has very carefully analysed the three principal grounds of the complaint advanced by Councillor Hitchins, and takes the view in each case that the facts do not demonstrate a breach of the Code. We agree with him that, despite being both unwise and unfortunate, Ms Thornberry’s actions did not amount to a breach of the Code of Conduct. In particular, as the Commissioner has pointed out, there is no evidence of any intention on her part to deceive or manipulate the public, nor was that the effect of her actions. We do not therefore uphold Councillor Hitchins’ complaint. 12. We nonetheless take this opportunity to remind Members that they should not issue press releases with added comments from themselves, particularly press releases originated by public bodies, without being clear that the originator wishes them to do so. If they have any doubts, they should clear the proposed comments with the originator before issuing their own version of the release. Had Ms Thornberry done so in this case, the grounds of the complaint against her would not have arisen. 2 WE12, p. 34. 3 Appendix, para. 49. Conduct of Ms Emily Thornberry 5 Appendix: Memorandum from the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Contents Page Complaint against Ms Emily Thornberry 6 The Complaint 6 Relevant Provisions of the Code of Conduct 8 My Inquiries 8 Ms Thornberry’s response 8 Comments by the Electoral Commission 11 Additional Comments by Ms Thornberry 12 Findings of Fact 13 Conclusion 13 Written evidence received by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 19 1. Letter to the Commissioner from Cllr Steve Hitchins, 16 March 2006 19 2. Letter from Cllr Steve Hitchins to the Prime Minister, 16 March 2006 21 3. Original News Release from The Electoral Commission, 20 February 2006 22 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Emily Thornberry
    1 EMILY THORNBERRY ANDREW MARR SHOW, 5TH FEBRUARY, 2017 I/V EMILY THORNBERRY, SHADOW FOREIGN SECRETARY Andrew Marr: We've been seeing this week the first signs of canvassers stumbling around the by-election centres of Stoke Central and Copeland. That's where Labour will hear a meaningful verdict on their recent performance. The Shadow Foreign Secretary Emily Thornberry joins me now. Emily Thornberry, 47 Labour MPs, including 10 front benchers voted against the whip or didn’t support the whip this week. Were they right do so? You have a remain constituency. Emily Thornberry: Listen, I know your narrative is, as you said at the top of the programme, that we are hopelessly divided. I really don’t think that is fair. Let me say why. The Labour Party is a national party and we represent the nation and the nation is divided on this, and it is very difficult and many MPs representing majority remain constituencies have this very difficult balancing act between do I represent my constituency, or do I represent the nation? Labour, as a national party, have a clear view. We have been given our instructions. We lost the referendum. We fought to stay in Europe but the public have spoken and so we do as we’re told. But the important thing now is not to give Theresa May a blank cheque, we have to make sure we get the right deal for the country. Andrew Marr: Absolutely, and I want to come onto that, but it sounds as if you’re saying that you understand the motives of those Labour MPs who voted with their conscience against triggering Article 50 and will carry on doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • Barron V Collins 2017 EWHC 162 (QC)
    Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 162 (QB) Case No: HQ14D04882 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 06/02/2017 Before: MR JUSTICE WARBY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: (1) SIR KEVIN BARRON MP Claimant (2) RT HON JOHN HEALEY MP (3) SARAH CHAMPION - and - JANE COLLINS MEP Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gavin Millar QC and Sara Mansoori (instructed by Steel & Shamash) for the Claimants The defendant did not appear, but Mr Mick Burchill was permitted to make representations on her behalf. Hearing date: 31st January 2017 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Judgment Approved by the court for handing down (subject to editorial corrections) If this Judgment has been emailed to you it is to be treated as ‘read-only’. You should send any suggested amendments as a separate Word document. Judgment Approved by the court for handing down Barron v Collins [2017] EWHC 162 (QB) (subject to editorial corrections) Mr Justice Warby : 1. This has been a hearing to assess compensation pursuant to the Defamation Act 1996, following the claimants’ acceptance of an offer of amends. BACKGROUND 2. The three claimants, Sir Kevin Barron, Rt. Hon. John Healey, and Sarah Champion, are all Labour Party MPs for constituencies in and around Rotherham, Yorkshire. The defendant, Ms Collins, is the MEP for Yorkshire, a member of the UK Independence Party. The claim arises from a speech made by Ms Collins at the UKIP Party Conference on 26 September 2014. The speech was broadcast live on the BBC Parliament channel, and republished in whole or in part on the UKIP website, Twitter, and the Press Association Mediapoint wire service.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions Tabled on Tuesday 6 July 2021
    Published: Wednesday 7 July 2021 Questions tabled on Tuesday 6 July 2021 Includes questions tabled on earlier days which have been transferred. T Indicates a topical oral question. Members are selected by ballot to ask a Topical Question. † Indicates a Question not included in the random selection process but accepted because the quota for that day had not been filled. N Indicates a question for written answer on a named day under S.O. No. 22(4). [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Wednesday 7 July Questions for Written Answer 1 Ruth Jones (Newport West): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he has had discussions with the Welsh Government on the potential merits of setting a target for marine energy ahead of COP26. [Transferred] (27308) 2 Ruth Jones (Newport West): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he has had discussions with the Scottish Government on the potential merits of setting a target for marine energy ahead of COP26. [Transferred] (27309) 3 Ruth Jones (Newport West): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he has had discussions with the Northern Ireland Executive on the potential merits of setting a target for marine energy ahead of COP26. [Transferred] (27310) 4 Navendu Mishra (Stockport): To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, if she will consult with groups representing blind and partially- sighted people on the potential merits of reforming the safety information wording contained in household appliance instructions, previously governed by EU law, to make that information more inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report
    YouGov / Election Data Survey Results Sample Size: 1096 Labour Party Members Fieldwork: 27th February - 3rd March 2017 EU Ref Vote 2015 Vote Age Gender Social Grade Region Membership Length Not Rest of Midlands / Pre Corbyn After Corbyn Total Remain Leave Lab 18-39 40-59 60+ Male Female ABC1 C2DE London North Scotland Lab South Wales leader leader Weighted Sample 1096 961 101 859 237 414 393 288 626 470 743 353 238 322 184 294 55 429 667 Unweighted Sample 1096 976 96 896 200 351 434 311 524 572 826 270 157 330 217 326 63 621 475 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % HEADLINE VOTING INTENTION: Westminster [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote or don't know] Con 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Lab 92 92 95 92 93 92 92 93 92 94 90 97 94 90 94 93 93 89 95 Lib Dem 5 6 1 6 3 5 5 6 7 3 7 2 5 8 4 4 4 9 3 UKIP 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Other 1 2 0 1 3 2 1 1 1 3 2 0 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 Other Parties Voting Intention [Weighted by likelihood to vote, excluding those who would not vote or don't know] SNP/ PCY 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Green 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 BNP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Respect 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 © 2017 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA
    The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA Dear Prime Minister, We are writing to you as a group of cross-party parliamentarians to express our grave concern over the contents of US President Donald Trump’s so-called ‘peace plan’ for Israel and the Palestinians. The plan presented on 28 January shows contempt for the rights of the Palestinian people and international law, and provides no realistic basis for a return to negotiations. Instead, it makes peace less likely, and threatens to undermine a fundamental principle of the post-WWII international legal order: the prohibition of annexation and territorial conquest. The long-standing position of the UK is that a negotiated peace settlement must be agreed to achieve a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders, leading to a safe and secure Israel living alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state that has secure and recognised borders, and with Jerusalem as a shared capital of both states. The vision presented by the US administration is one where Palestinians would have none of these: no true shared capital in Jerusalem, no sovereign control of its borders or security, and with Israeli control far beyond the Green Line. As a group of 16 UK charities warned this week: “if implemented [the plan] will lead to the formal annexation of Palestinian land, perpetual Israeli occupation, and the negation of Palestinians’ collective right to self-determination.” It is a plan that the Palestinians have no choice but to reject if they wish to maintain their fundamental rights, but that they will be punished for not accepting.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Year 2017-18 (PDF)
    Envelope (Inc. Paper (Inc. Postage (Inc. Grand Total Member of Parliament's Name Parliamentary Constituency VAT) VAT) VAT) Adam Afriyie MP Windsor £188.10 £160.85 £2,437.50 £2,786.45 Adam Holloway MP Gravesham £310.74 £246.57 £3,323.75 £3,881.06 Adrian Bailey MP West Bromwich West £87.78 £0.00 £1,425.00 £1,512.78 Afzal Khan MP Manchester Gorton £327.49 £636.95 £6,885.00 £7,849.44 Alan Brown MP Kilmarnock and Loudoun £238.29 £203.34 £2,463.50 £2,905.13 Alan Mak MP Havant £721.71 £385.00 £7,812.50 £8,919.21 Albert Owen MP Ynys Mon £93.11 £86.12 £812.50 £991.73 Alberto Costa MP South Leicestershire £398.43 £249.23 £3,802.50 £4,450.16 Alec Shelbrooke MP Elmet and Rothwell £116.73 £263.57 £2,240.00 £2,620.30 Alex Burghart MP Brentwood & Ongar £336.60 £318.63 £3,190.00 £3,845.23 Alex Chalk MP Cheltenham £476.58 £274.30 £4,915.00 £5,665.88 Alex Cunningham MP Stockton North £182.70 £154.09 £1,817.50 £2,154.29 Alex Norris MP Nottingham North £217.42 £383.88 £2,715.00 £3,316.30 Alex Sobel MP Leeds North West £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 Alison McGovern MP Wirral South £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 Alister Jack MP Dumfries and Galloway £437.04 £416.31 £4,955.50 £5,808.85 Alok Sharma MP Reading West £374.19 £399.80 £4,332.50 £5,106.49 Rt Hon Alun Cairns MP Vale of Glamorgan £446.30 £105.53 £8,305.00 £8,856.83 Amanda Milling MP Cannock Chase £387.40 £216.72 £4,340.00 £4,944.12 Andrea Jenkyns MP Morley & Outwood £70.14 £266.82 £560.00 £896.96 Andrew Bowie MP W Aberdeenshire & Kincardine £717.92 £424.42 £7,845.00 £8,987.34 Andrew Bridgen MP North West Leicestershire
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW SHADOW CABINET 2020 Who’S In, Who’S Out?
    NEW SHADOW CABINET 2020 Who’s In, Who’s Out? BRIEFING PAPER blackcountrychamber.co.uk Who’s in and Who’s out? Sir Keir Starmer, newly elected Leader of the UK Labour Party, set about building his first Shadow Cabinet, following his election win in the Labour Party leadership contest. In our parliamentary system, a cabinet reshuffle or shuffle is an informal term for an event that occurs when the head of a government or party rotates or changes the composition of ministers in their cabinet. The Shadow Cabinet is a function of the Westminster system consisting of a senior group of opposition spokespeople. It is the Shadow Cabinet’s responsibility to scrutinise the policies and actions of the government, as well as to offer alternative policies. Position Former Post Holder Result of New Post Holder Reshuffle Leader of the Opposition The Rt Hon Jeremy Resigned The Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer and Leader of the Labour Corbyn MP KCB QC MP Party Deputy Leader and Chair of Tom Watson Resigned Angela Raynor MP the Labour Party Shadow Chancellor of the The Rt Hon John Resigned Anneliese Dodds MP Exchequer McDonnell MP Shadow Foreign Secretary The Rt Hon Emily Moved to Lisa Nandy MP Thornberry MP International Trade Shadow Home Secretary The Rt Hon Diane Resigned Nick Thomas-Symonds MP Abbott MP Shadow Chancellor of the Rachel Reeves MP Duchy of Lancaster Shadow Justice Secretary Richard Burgon MP Left position The Rt Hon David Lammy MP Shadow Defence Secretary Nia Griffith MP Moved to Wales The Rt Hon John Healey MP Office Shadow Business, Energy Rebecca
    [Show full text]
  • Questions to the Secretary of State for Defence
    Published: Friday 18 October 2019 Questions for oral answer on a future day (Future Day Orals) Questions for oral answer on a future day as of Friday 18 October 2019. T Indicates a topical question. Members are selected by ballot to ask a Topical Question. [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Monday 21 October Oral Questions to the Secretary of State for Defence 1 Dr David Drew (Stroud): What recent assessment he has made of trends in the number of Army personnel. (900000) 2 Mr John Baron (Basildon and Billericay): What steps his Department is taking to protect UK shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. (900001) 3 Andrew Jones (Harrogate and Knaresborough): What steps his Department is taking to (a) recruit and (b) retain service personnel. (900002) 4 Robert Halfon (Harlow): What steps his Department is taking to (a) recruit and (b) retain service personnel. (900003) 5 Vicky Ford (Chelmsford): What steps his Department is taking to (a) recruit and (b) retain service personnel. (900004) 6 Bambos Charalambous (Enfield, Southgate): What recent assessment he has made of the quality of service provided under contracts outsourced by his Department. (900005) 7 Matt Western (Warwick and Leamington): What steps he is taking to support the UK defence industry. (900007) 8 Stephen Metcalfe (South Basildon and East Thurrock): What steps his Department is taking to maintain the capabilities of UK defence manufacturing. (900008) 9 Mr Steve Baker (Wycombe): What recent assessment he has made of the adequacy of the (a) capabilities and (b) strength of the armed forces.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Official Report Parliamentary
    Thursday Volume 664 26 September 2019 No. 343 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 26 September 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 843 26 SEPTEMBER 2019 Speaker’s Statement 844 there will be an urgent question later today on the House of Commons matter to which I have just referred, and that will be an opportunity for colleagues to say what they think. This is something of concern across the House. It is Thursday 26 September 2019 not a party political matter and, certainly as far as I am concerned, it should not be in any way, at any time, to any degree a matter for partisan point scoring. It is The House met at half-past Nine o’clock about something bigger than an individual, an individual party or an individual political or ideological viewpoint. Let us treat of it on that basis. In the meantime, may I just ask colleagues—that is all I am doing and all I can PRAYERS do as your representative in the Chair—please to lower the decibel level and to try to treat each other as opponents, not as enemies? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Sir Peter Bottomley (Worthing West) (Con): On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Speaker’s Statement Mr Speaker: Order. I genuinely am not convinced, but I will take one point of order if the hon. Gentleman Mr Speaker: Before we get under way with today’s insists.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study in Political Complexity
    THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD A.LENT LABOUR'S TRANSFORMATION 1983 -1989: A STUDY IN POLITICAL COMPLEXITY THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE Of PhD. 1997 (/ (., "", './1",' . ";~j'- i LABOUR'S TRANSFORMATION 1983 -1989: A STUDY IN POLITICAL COMPLEXITY ADAM LENT THESIS SUBMITTED FOR TilE DEGREE OF PhD. DEPARTl\IENT OF POLITICS SHEFFIELD UNIVERSITY AUGUST 1997 ii CONTENTS Acknowledgements III Abstract v A Note on References VII 1. Introduction 1 PART I: COMPLEXITY AND POLITICS 2. Towards Complexity in Political Analysis 14 3. Complexity and Analysis of Labour in the 1980s 77 PART n: LABOUR'S TRANSFORMATION 1983-1989 4. The Early Days of the Leadership 126 5. The Miners, Militant and the Rates 184 6. Organisational Change 232 7. The New Agenda 270 8. Election Defeat and Leadership Challenge 311 9. Policy Reform and the New Establishment 354 10. Conclusion: Acknowledging Simplification 400 References. 424 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank: the following for their help, support and advice regarding this thesis: Tim Bale, Iulian Bass, David Blunkett, Roger Charlton, Andrew Chipperfield, David Donald, Daniel Fox, Andrew Gamble, Stephen George, Alan Haworth, Bill Hughes, Tim Jordan, Mike Kenny, Sheena MacKenzie, Hugh McLachlan, Patrick Seyd, Eric Shaw, Martin Smith, Gary Taylor and to all those who attended and contributed to seminars at which I presented papers based on this thesis. The libraries used in this research were as follows: Sheffield University Library; Sheffield Hallam University Library; Sheffield City Library; the library at The Museum of Labour History; Glasgow Caledonian University Library; the British Library of Political and Economic Science; and the newspapers and periodicals branch of the British Library.
    [Show full text]