DOCSLIB.ORG

Safeguard Screening Form Prepared By: Michele Andrianarisata Date of Preparation: Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Safeguard Screening Form Prepared By: Michele Andrianarisata Date of Preparation: Comments CI-GEF Project Screening Form 03/02/2016 1. The CI-GEF Project Agency undertakes environmental and social safeguard screening of each proposed project to determine whether an ESIA is required and if so, the appropriate extent and type of ESIA (see Policy #1 and Appendix I for more details). The CI-GEF Project Agency classifies the proposed project into one of three categories, depending on the type, location, sensitivity and scale of the project and the nature and magnitude of its potential environmental and social impacts. The descriptions of the categories and lists of types of projects identified in Appendix I are meant to serve as guidance to proposal reviewers and are not meant to be exhaustive. 2. All proposed activities will undergo safeguard screening to determine eligibility under CI-GEF ESMF policies, the type of ESIA that they are subject to and if proposed project activities trigger any of the safeguards policies. 3. The Executing Entity is responsible for providing responses to each of the questions outlined in this form when submitting a PIF to the Project Agency for consideration. 4. The Project Agency is responsible for conducting all aspects of the safeguard screening process, from initiation to making the final decision on whether or not an ESIA is necessary and, if so, at what level along with whether a project-level plan is required if a safeguard is triggered. I. PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Country: MADAGASCAR GEF Project ID: 9606 Project Title: Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity in the Northwestern Landscape (Boeny region) - Madagascar Name of the Executing Entity(ies): Conservation International Madagascar Length of Project: 36 months Start date: May 2019 End date: May 2022 Introduction: (location, main issues to be addressed by project) Location: The Northwestern Landscape (Boeny region) includes five protected areas (Ankarafantsika National Park, Biocultural Site of Antrema, Complex Mahavavy Kinkony, National Park of Baly Bay, and Bombetoka Belemboka . Main issues to be addressed by project are improvement of the management effectives of five key protected areas that harbor globally threatened species, identifying additional sources of funding for the financial needs gaps and finally the promotion of best practices and sustainable utilization of natural resources for the Boeny region, especially in five municipalities bordering targeted PAs, while ensuring that stakeholders understand the multiple benefits that these best practices will bring to local and regional economies. Project Background: (description of physical, biological and socioeconomic context, including Indigenous Peoples and reference to how gender may play a role) The Boeny region, with a total area of 30,000 km2, is located in the Madagascar West Biome. The region is largely drained by a particularly dense river network, giving it significant water resources, including large lakes, such as the Kinkony Lake, the second largest lake in the country. This western region harbors dry forest habitats that rank amongst the most distinctive ecosystems in Madagascar, and is home to several lemur species of global significance. The Boeny region has been identified as containing particularly high levels of biodiversity of global importance, generating environmental goods and services of national importance (e.g. water supply), and being vulnerable to a number of threats of both anthropic and natural origin, as described in earlier sections. The project area is subject to important environmental pressures (threats) such as traditional slash and burn (tavy) agriculture, timber extraction, harvesting of other forest CI-GEF Project Screening Form 03/02/2016 resources, and mining. Charcoal production is a common activity among local communities, with production for home use and sale. It is estimated that there are about 77,500 inhabitants living in the areas surrounding the targeted protected areas. Most of these households in the area engage in subsistence activities, which are characterized by extremely low levels of productivity and sustainability, and high environmental impact such as charcoal production, on agriculture, livestock, fisheries, mining, and ecotourism. According to the National Institute of Statistics (2014), the Boeny region has a population of 821,356 inhabitants of whom the majority is female (55 percent). Despite their number and status as key stakeholders, women rarely influence planning and decision making in land management. There are a large number of women’s associations that pursue various activities such as the promotion of raw silk, cooking, embroidery, etc., but the impacts on women empowerment are still limited. Recognizing the fundamental roles played by women, the project will make great efforts to advance gender equity and women’s empowerment every time it is relevant. Project Objectives: The objective of this project is “to strengthen the long-term conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in the Northwestern Landscape of Madagascar”. Project Components and Main Proposed Activities: Component 1: Strengthening the management and the sustainable financing of five protected areas to reduce the threats on natural resources and to contribute to the resiliency of the Northwestern Landscape (Boeny region) Outcome 1.1.: Increased management effectiveness of five targeted PAs of the Northwestern Landscape - Mainstream the objectives of PAs into larger planning schemes - Support the implementation of the activities defined in management plans - Strengthen capacities of local communities and their involvement in the PA governance. Outcome 1.2.: Improved financial sustainability of 5 targeted PAs - Improve the long-term financial sustainability of the targeted PAs - Help leverage additional funding by identifying new donors COMPONENT 2: Supporting sustainable use of biodiversity by local communities around targeted PAs to strengthen PA protection efforts and improve community wellbeing Outcome 2.1.: Key local communities around targeted PAs adopted sustainable production practices - Support the development or implementation of municipality land use planning (SAC) in 5 municipalities: Katsepy, Antseza, Ankazomborona, Boanamary and Soalala - Scale-up and support sustainable production practices in PA buffer areas based on the SAC and 5 PA’s Environmental and Social Safeguard Plans - Improve livelihoods while promoting subsistence production approaches that help conserve or sustainably use key biodiversity Compliance with Environmental Conventions: Explain how your project’s objectives, outcomes and outcomes align with the main conventions that CI adheres to. These include UNCBD, UNFCCC, RAMSAR Convention, CITES, and UNCCD. - UNCDB - CITES CI-GEF Project Screening Form 03/02/2016 Compliance with Country Legal and Institutional Frameworks: 1. Explain how your project aligns/will align with national laws and/or frameworks related to the environment (this may include national ESIA or EIA laws, etc.) - This project is consistent with, and will contribute to, the achievement of national development strategies and plans that relate to biodiversity protection and sustainable development. - The project will contribute to Madagascar’s achievement of Aichi Targets 5, 7, 11 and 12. - The project will also focus on ensuring that biodiversity considerations are more actively taken into account in sectoral frameworks and therefore are aligned with the third and fifth pillars of the National Development Plan (2015-2019): "Inclusive growth and territorial anchoring of development” and “Treasuring natural capital and strengthening resilience to risks and catastrophes.” 2. When national legal and institutional frameworks are inadequate, the proposal should include a statement explaining how this problem will be addressed, either as part of the project or by a third party. 3. When national legal and institutional frameworks do not apply to or impact the project and its objectives, the reason for that conclusion needs to be stated. - Project Justification (e.g., Alignment with Country and CI Institutional Priorities, GEF Focal Area Strategies): The project is supportive of ➢ the new Malagasy Strategy of Biodiversity (NBSAP) and the President Rajaonarimampianin’s promise in Sydney to harmoniously integrate PAs into the overall environmental landscape; ➢ Sustainable landscapes and seascapes/ sustainable production(CI) GEF Focal Area(s): Biodiversity (BD-1 program1 et BD-4 program 9) GEF Project Amount: USD 6,817,431 Other Financing Amounts by Source: USD 10,816,936 Safeguard Screening Form Prepared by: Michele Andrianarisata Date of preparation: Comments: II. PROJECT ELEGIBILITY QUESTIONS Answer the following questions to determine if the project is eligible for CI-GEF funding Will the project: Yes No 1. Propose to create significant destruction or degradation of critical natural habitats1 of any type or have significant negative socioeconomic and cultural impacts that cannot be cost-effectively avoided, minimized, mitigated and/or offset? 1 Habitats considered essential for biodiversity conservation, provision of ecosystem services and the well-being of people at the local, national, regional o global levels. They include, among others, existing protected areas, areas officially proposed as protected areas, areas recognized as protected by traditional local communities, as well as areas identified as important for conservation, such as Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) Sites, Important Bird
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lemur News 7 (2002).Pdf
    Lemur News Vol. 7, 2002 Page 1 Conservation International’s President EDITORIAL Awarded Brazil’s Highest Honor In recognition of his years of conservation work in Brazil, CI President Russell Mittermeier was awarded the National Are you in favor of conservation? Do you know how conser- Order of the Southern Cross by the Brazilian government. vation is viewed by the academic world? I raise these ques- Dr. Mittermeier received the award on August 29, 2001 at tions because they are central to current issues facing pri- the Brazilian Ambassador's residence in Washington, DC. matology in general and prosimians specifically. The National Order of the Southern Cross was created in The Duke University Primate Center is in danger of being 1922 to recognize the merits of individuals who have helped closed because it is associated with conservation. An inter- to strengthen Brazil's relations with the international com- nal university review in 2001 stated that the Center was too munity. The award is the highest given to a foreign national focused on conservation and not enough on research. The re- for service in Brazil. viewers were all researchers from the "hard" sciences, but For the past three decades, Mittermeier has been a leader in they perceived conservation to be a negative. The Duke ad- promoting biodiversity conservation in Brazil and has con- ministration had similar views and wanted more emphasis ducted numerous studies on primates and other fauna in the on research and less on conservation. The new Director has country. During his time with the World Wildlife Fund three years to make that happen.
    [Show full text]
  • TDR Annexe7 Rapport Analyse 322 Communes OATF
    ETAT DES LIEUX DES 319 COMMUNES POUR LE FINANCEMENT ADDITIONNEL DU PROJET CASEF Février 2019 TABLE DES MATIERES TABLE DES MATIERES .................................................................................................................... i LISTE DES ACRONYMES ................................................................................................................ iii Liste des tableaux ......................................................................................................................... v Listes des Cartes ........................................................................................................................... v Liste des figures ............................................................................................................................vi Liste des photos ...........................................................................................................................vi I INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 II METHODOLOGIES .................................................................................................................... 2 II.1 CHOIX DES 322 COMMUNES OBJETS D’ENQUETE ............................................................... 2 II.2 CHOIX DES CRITERES DE SELECTION DES COMMUNES ........................................................ 5 II.3 METHODOLOGIE DE COLLECTE DE DONNEES ET ACTIVITES ................................................. 6
    [Show full text]
  • MAHAJANGA BV Reçus: 246 Sur 246
    RESULTATS SENATORIALES DU 29/12/2015 FARITANY: 4 MAHAJANGA BV reçus: 246 sur 246 INDEPE TIM MANAR AREMA MAPAR HVM NDANT ANARA : FANILO N°BV Emplacement AP AT Inscrits Votants B N S E ASSOCI REGION 41 BETSIBOKA BV reçus 39 sur 39 DISTRICT: 4101 KANDREHO BV reçus7 sur 7 01 AMBALIHA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 02 ANDASIBE 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 4 03 ANTANIMBARIBE 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 3 04 BEHAZOMATY 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 3 05 BETAIMBOAY 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 4 06 KANDREHO 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 3 07 MAHATSINJO SUD 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 TOTAL DISTRICT 0 0 42 40 0 40 0 11 0 1 1 27 DISTRICT: 4102 MAEVATANANA BV reçus19 sur 19 01 AMBALAJIA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 1 02 AMBALANJANAKOMBY 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 1 3 03 ANDRIBA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 0 0 2 4 04 ANTANIMBARY 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 7 05 ANTSIAFABOSITRA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 5 06 BEANANA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 4 07 BEMOKOTRA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 1 2 08 BERATSIMANINA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 09 BERIVOTRA 5/5 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 4 10 MADIROMIRAFY 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 4 11 MAEVATANANA I 0 0 10 9 0 9 0 3 0 0 2 4 12 MAEVATANANA II 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 6 13 MAHATSINJO 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 14 MAHAZOMA 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 2 0 0 2 4 15 MANGABE 0 0 8 7 0 7 0 1 0 0 1 5 16 MARIA 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 3 17 MAROKORO 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 4 18 MORAFENO 0 0 6 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 19 TSARARANO 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 3 0 0 2 3 TOTAL DISTRICT 0 0 134 125 0 125 0 33 0 0 15 77 DISTRICT: 4103 TSARATANANA BV reçus13 sur 13 01 AMBAKIRENY 0 0 8 8 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 4 02 AMPANDRANA 0 0 6 6 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 3 03 ANDRIAMENA 0 0 8 7 0 7 0 4 0 0 0 3 04
    [Show full text]
  • Rep 2 out Public 2010 S Tlet Sur of Ma Urvey Rvey Adagas Repor Scar Rt
    Evidence for Malaria Medicines Policy Outlet Survey Republic of Madagascar 2010 Survey Report MINSTERE DE LA SANTE PUBLIQUE www. ACTwatch.info Copyright © 2010 Population Services International (PSI). All rights reserved. Acknowledgements ACTwatch is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This study was implemented by Population Services International (PSI). ACTwatch’s Advisory Committee: Mr. Suprotik Basu Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Rik Bosman Supply Chain Expert, Former Senior Vice President, Unilever Ms. Renia Coghlan Global Access Associate Director, Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) Dr. Thom Eisele Assistant Professor, Tulane University Mr. Louis Da Gama Malaria Advocacy & Communications Director, Global Health Advocates Dr. Paul Lavani Executive Director, RaPID Pharmacovigilance Program Dr. Ramanan Senior Fellow, Resources for the Future Dr. Matthew Lynch Project Director, VOICES, Johns Hopkins University Centre for Dr. Bernard Nahlen Deputy Coordinator, President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) Dr. Jayesh M. Pandit Head, Pharmacovigilance Department, Pharmacy and Poisons Board‐Kenya Dr. Melanie Renshaw Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Oliver Sabot Vice‐President, Vaccines Clinton Foundation Ms. Rima Shretta Senior Program Associate, Strengthening Pharmaceutical Systems Dr. Rick Steketee Science Director, Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa Dr. Warren Stevens Health Economist Dr. Gladys Tetteh CDC Resident Advisor, President’s Malaria
    [Show full text]
  • District Commune Nombre Candidats
    NOMBRE DISTRICT COMMUNE ENTITE NOM ET PRENOM(S) CANDIDATS CANDIDATS AMBATO BOENI AMBATOBOENY 1 IRK (Isika Rehetra Miaraka @ Andry Rajoelina) RAKOTONANDRASANA Jean Victor INDEPENDANT LEMARIJY MATOKAN_DIA AMBATO BOENI AMBATOBOENY 1 RAKOTOZAFY Ravalomande Wilibald André (INDEPENDANT LEMARIJY MATOKAN_DIA) INDEPENDANT RAKOTOVAO RAPHAEL AMBATO BOENI AMBATOBOENY 1 RAKOTOVAO Raphael (INDEPENDANT RAKOTOVAO RAPHAEL) AMBATO BOENI AMBONDROMAMY 1 MMM (Malagasy Miara-miainga) RAKOTONDRASOA Tahina Tsiresy INDEPENDANT (Independant Rakotoarimahafaka AMBATO BOENI AMBONDROMAMY 1 RAKOTOARIMAHAFAKA Jean Louis Jean Louis) INDEPENDANT AMBONDROMAMY MIRAY AMBATO BOENI AMBONDROMAMY 1 RAKOTOARISON Samuel (Independant Ambondromamy Miray) AMBATO BOENI AMBONDROMAMY 1 IRK (Isika Rehetra Miaraka @ Andry Rajoelina) ANDONIAINAMALALA Sylvie Raphaelie AMBATO BOENI ANDRANOFASIKA 1 TIM (Tiako I Madagasikara) RANDRIAMBOLOLONA Njakaharivelonirina Hervé AMBATO BOENI ANDRANOFASIKA 1 INDEPENDANT WILLIAM (Independant William) RAMAROSON William AMBATO BOENI ANDRANOFASIKA 1 IRK (Isika Rehetra Miaraka @ Andry Rajoelina) RAZAFIMAHAFALY Solofotiana Emma INDEPENDANT ADIDIKO NO MANASOA NY AMBATO BOENI ANDRANOMAMY 1 TANANAN_TSIKA (INDEPENDANT ADIDIKO NO RAMANANJANAHARY Auguste MANASOA NY TANANAN_TSIKA) INDEPENDANT ANDRIAMAHOLY JOCELYN GOD AMBATO BOENI ANDRANOMAMY 1 FRED DIT MAHOSY (Independant Andriamaholy ANDRIAMAHOLY Hasinimalala Jocelyn God Fred Jocelyn God Fred Dit Mahosy) AMBATO BOENI ANDRANOMAMY 1 IRK (Isika Rehetra Miaraka @ Andry Rajoelina) RATAHIANJANAHARY Jean Claudin INDEPENDANT
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Community Logistics: Results from Use of Hovercraft to Improve the Distribution of Health Commodities in Boeny Region, Madagascar
    Hovercraft on Lac Kinkony Improving Community Logistics: Results from Use of Hovercraft to Improve the Distribution of Health Commodities in Boeny Region, Madagascar Final Report November 2013 Contents 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 8 3. Evaluating the Impact................................................................................................................ 14 4. Results ...................................................................................................................................... 17 5. Other Innovations ...................................................................................................................... 29 6. Scale-Up Opportunities ............................................................................................................. 30 7. Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 34 8. Annexes .................................................................................................................................... 35 2 Acronyms and Abbreviations 4x4 Four wheel drive vehicles ACT Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy ARI Acute Respiratory Infection CBIHP Community-Based Integrated Health Program CHW Community Health Worker
    [Show full text]
  • Les Mortiers Malgaches
    MÉMOIRES ~t)Ë L'INSTITUT SCIENTlFIQUE .DE-:- MADAGASCAR, Série C - Tome 1 - Fascicule 2 - 1952 LES MORTIERS MALGACHES par Raymond. DECARY de l'Académie des Sciences coloniales ·NOTE LHIINATRE. - La documentation qui a servi à la rédaction de ce travail a été rassemblée au cours de tournées effectuées à travers Mudaqascar entre les années Hl20 ct 1910 ; les précisions apportées ici sc rapportent donc à cette période. Il est possible qu'aujourd'hui certaines des indications qui vont être données aient besoin d'une révision. Le Mclqache est en pleine évolution et, avec lui, lemalériel domestique qu'il utilise. Les objets munuiccturés d'Europe pénètrent dans les oillaqes les plus lointains; lepétrole remplace la graisse pourl'éclairage, la table a fait son apparition partout, la sandale de caoutchouc découpée dans de vieux pneus remplace la kappa primitive. En ce qui concerne en particulier les mortiers à riz, l'interpénétration actuelle, conséquence des migrations des M erina el des Betsileo, qui essaiment comme cultivateurs ou commerçants dans une grande partie des régions côtières, peul être devenue une cause de modifica­ tions dans les formes primitives, ou même de remplacement de celles-ci par d'autres modèles introduits sous l'influence des nouveaux 'uenus. Dans le matériel domestique de l'indigène de Madagascar, le mortier à riz avec son pilon représente une des pièces essentielles. Le pilonnage est réservé exclusivement aux femmes qui l'accomplissent soit seules, soit par groupes de deux ou trois, parfois même de quatre, faisant tomber le pilon alternativement dans le mortier, sans jamais que le moindre heurt vienne interrompre la régularité de la cadence, que vient scander de temps à autre une sorte de susurration.
    [Show full text]
  • Transfert De Subvention Par FDL Aux Communes : Réalisation 2017 Et Prévision 2018
    2018 Transfert de subvention par FDL aux communes : Réalisation 2017 et prévision 2018 Fonds de Développement Local Rue, Pierre Stibbe Anosy Antananarivo. e-mail: [email protected] Tel: 0 34 05 522 75 Tel: 0 33 37 690 99 www.fdl.mg Page 1 23/04/2018 Sommaire RECAPITULATION DES TRANSFERTS ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Récapitulation des transferts réalisation 2017 et prévision 2018 ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 REALISATION DE TRANSFERT DE SUBVENTION DES COMMUNES POUR 2017 ..................................................................................................................... 5 Ressource Propre Interne (RPI)......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Fonds National de Péréquation (FNP) ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Programme de Développement Communal Inclusif et de Décentralisation (PDCID) : Phase d'études : Conventions, APS, APD, Appels d'offres .................... 9 Projet d'Appui à la Réforme de la Sécurisation Foncière (ARSF) ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • E136510paper.Pdf
    E1 365 REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR Public Disclosure Authorized MINISTERE DE L'AGRICULTURE, DE L'ELEVAGE ET DE LA PECHE Public Disclosure Authorized PROJET BASSINS VERSANTS PERIMETRES IRRIGUES PLAN DE GESTION DESTPEST SESI'- PESTICI ~S. ,.- « ~~-,' e4 ' <-- »w$;t -J@'|ôE;+1lO Public Disclosure Authorized . , , .1. | 1. ~ .t ~ ~ ~lw ~ ~ v v Rapport préliminaire Consultant: Djibril Doucouré /GES Conseil Public Disclosure Authorized Docteur es Sciences Environnement et Santé ddouc(ivrefer.sn. [email protected] Mars 2006 SOMMAIRE 4 RESUME EXECUTIF ..................................................................... EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................... 5 6 INTRODUCTION ..... ................................................................ 1- PRESENTATION ..................................................................... 9 9 1-1 PRESENTATION SOMMAIRE PAYS ...................................................................... 13 1-2 METHODOLOGIE D'ELABORATION DU PLAN ..................................................................... Il CADRE POLITIQUE, REGLEMENTAIRE ET CAPACITE INSTITUTIONNELLE ................................................. 14 14 2-1 POLITIQUE DE GESTION DES PESTES ET D'UTILISATION DES PESTICIDES ...................................................... ............... 16 2-2 LE CADRE REGLEMENTAIRE SUR LES PESTES ET PESTICIDES ..................................................................... 2-2-1 Présentation....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT DOCUMENT UNDP GEF PIMS No
    United Nations Development Programme Country: Madagascar PROJECT DOCUMENT UNDP GEF PIMS no. 4172 Project Title: Network of Managed Resource Protected Areas UNDAF Outcome(s): Living conditions and productivity of rural population within target zones are improved. UNDP Strategic Plan - Environment and Sustainable Development Primary Outcome: Expanding access to environmental and energy services for the poor UNDP Strategic Plan Secondary Outcome: The UNDP goal in the area of environment and energy is to strengthen national capacity to manage the environment in a sustainable manner while ensuring adequate protection of the poor. Specific results have been identified to mainstream environmental and energy issues into development planning; mobilize finance for improved environmental management; address increasing threats from climate change; and build local capacity to better manage the environment and deliver services, especially water and energy Expected CP Outcome(s): Environment in and surrounding Targeted conservation zones is protected Expected CPAP Output (s): [Project Objective] To expand the PA system of Madagascar by developing a sub-network of managed resource protected areas in represented ecological landscapes, co-managed by local government and communities and integrated into regional development frameworks. [Project Components:] (1) New PAs created under IUCN Categories V and VI as a foundation for a functional and effective sub-network of Managed Resources Protected Areas based upon a common vision and management principles;
    [Show full text]
  • Ministère De L'agriculture, De L'elevage Et De La Pêche
    MINISTÈRE DE L’AGRICULTURE, DE L’ELEVAGE ET DE LA PÊCHE ******************** Deuxième Projet de Gouvernance des Pêches et de Croissance Partagée dans le Sud-ouest de l’Océan Indien (SWIOFish2) *********************** TERMES DE RÉFÉRENCE POUR LE RECRUTEMENT D’UN BUREAU EN CHARGE DU RECRUTEMENT ET LA GESTION D'ENQUÊTEURS STATISTIQUES POUR DEPLOIEMENT DU SYSTEME OPENARTFISH DANS CINQ RÉGIONS CÔTIÈRES DANS LE CADRE DE LA RÉALISATION DE L'ENQUÊTE DE PRODUCTION DE LA PETITE PÊCHE MARITIME À MADAGASCAR Code de l’activité : 2121040 Mars 2021 1-CONTEXTE DE LA MISSION Le Ministère en charge de la pêche et de l’aquaculture met en œuvre le projet SWIOFish2 (Second South West Indian Ocean Fisheries 2) dont les objectifs sont, entre autres, l’aménagement du secteur halieutique afin d’impliquer les populations locales dans tous les maillons de l’exploitation des ressources, mais aussi de s’assurer d’une meilleure protection des ressources via une sensibilisation massive desdites populations à la sauvegarde de l’environnement. Dans ce contexte, il est nécessaire et incontournable d’élaborer des statistiques fiables et exploitables sur les principales productions du secteur de la pêche et de l’aquaculture afin de : (i) mesurer et (ii) d’évaluer les changements sur le secteur. A cet effet, la collecte des données au niveau des régions prioritaires du projet SWIOFish2, le développement et la mise en œuvre du système de collecte de données pour les pêcheries traditionnelles, y compris une stratégie d'échantillonnage appropriée, a été déjà conçue dans la base de données OPENARTFISH sous Microsoft Access. Actuellement, cette base de données est convertie en application basée sur WEB qui est entièrement conceptualisée, fonctionnelle, opérationnelle et dispose d’un système décentralisé avec l’application de téléphone mobile.
    [Show full text]
  • Table De Matieres
    TABLE DE MATIERES LA REGION……………………………………………………………………………………………1 1 MILIEU PHYSIQUE .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 RELIEF ET PAYSAGES ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 La région littorale BOINA ................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 La région centrale ou Région de la Betsiboka .................................................................... 1 1.2 GEOLOGIE ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 CLIMAT .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Le réseau de stations météorologiques ................................................................................ 2 1.3.2 Température ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.3.3 Pluviométrie ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.4 Diagramme ombrothermique .............................................................................................. 4 1.3.5 Vents ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]