VC Daily: Cargill Joins Probiotics Company's Fundraising; 500 Startups Hosts Virtual Pitches; Edison Eyes Fund Good Day
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download Free
Contents Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 8 Chapter 1: Seed Fundraising 101 9 Chapter 2: How to Run a Swift Seed Fundraise 29 Chapter 3: Fundraising Narrative Preparation 40 Chapter 4: Researching and Engaging Angels 56 Chapter 5: Researching and Engaging VCs 68 Chapter 6: Pitching & Closing 88 Conclusion 111 Join the Community 112 Join the Community Oversubscribed isn’t just a book—it’s an ongoing community of founders and fundraising experts. Join thousands of others in the Oversubscribed community by signing up for our weekly newsletter, where we share stories and tips from founders, real decks that companies have used to raise their rounds, and inside knowledge from angels and VCs. The newsletter is also the best way to stay informed about our live events. Read a sample issue, sign up for ongoing updates, and access our full back archives at oversubscribed.club/join. You can also follow us on Twitter at @mwil20 (Mike) and @maxnuss (Max). We’d love to hear from you! —Mike & Max Oversubscribed: A Founder’s Guide to Seed Fundraising propellerdb.com/oversubscribed Introduction We’re writing this book because too many founders are daunted by fundraising. The truth is that there are more seed-stage investors, and more seed-stage capital being invested, than ever. Just as founders often feel that they have to scrape and claw their way to raising money, VCs often feel they have to go through similar trials to find good investments. But too many founders struggle with fundraising because they don’t understand how the seed fundraising ecosystem works and how to fundraise effectively and efficiently. -
Startups in Greece 2019
START UPS IN GREECE 2019 Re-mapping the investments landscape ANNUAL REPORT IN PARTNERSHIP WITH CON TENForeword 03 About EIT Digital 04 Found.ation 04 TS Velocity.Partners 04 Executive Summary Limitations and Methodology 05 The Greek Digital Economy 06 A statement from the Ministry of Development and Investments 11 The EquiFund’s Impact Short presentation of all VC funds and their investments so far 12 A statement from the EIF 23 The Greek startup ecosystem An analysis of the startups in the pre-seed and seed stages 24 Startup funding and exits Top of 2019 most funded/exits 36 Key takeaways and Suggestions 42 FOREWORD 10 year in & the next decade dominate international markets, but also attract of the Greek Startup internationally acclaimed investors like Bain Capital Ecosystem and Balderton. As the new decade reaches According to our report, for every euro invested from its closure, we cannot but an Equifund family fund, Greek startup companies question what is next have raised another two euro from private investors for the greek startup and international funding schemes. This is a very ecosystem. Although it clear and bold vote of confidence for the quality started as a clear underdog of the entrepreneurial level we as Greeks have to for the first decade of its offer. Moreover, this year, we recorded an increase existence, the greek startup in early stage (pre-seed and seed) investments; a Dimitris Kalavros-Gousiou community has undertaken development that strengthens the belief we need Investor, co-founder an impressive acceleration to invest more in the very early stage of the venture and partner of Velocity. -
What Gets an Idea Included? the Impact of Group Dynamics on Idea Inclusion in Team Meetings
TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Fakultät für Informatik Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftsinformatik (I 17) Univ.-Prof. Dr. Helmut Krcmar What Gets an Idea Included? The Impact of Group Dynamics on Idea Inclusion in Team Meetings Tobias Schlachtbauer, M.Sc. Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Informatik der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Florian Matthes Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Prof. Dr. Helmut Krcmar 2. Prof. Dr. Michael Schermann Die Dissertation wurde am 24.05.2018 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät für Informatik am 26.09.2018 angenommen. Abstract I Abstract Motivation: Working in teams on solving complex tasks, including software development or service design, is common in today’s organizations. All these tasks require some creativity. This is especially true if the creation of innovative solutions to a problem is required. On the one hand, research findings suggest that teams are preferable to individuals for solving problems because the diverse points of view might spark more creative solutions. On the other hand, groups are found being prone to detrimental behaviors like groupthink or choosing not the best design. The disadvantages of groups are often attributed to misunderstandings due to the divers disciplinary or cultural background of the team members. Yet, other issues might be at play that leads to situations in which a team does not realize the full potential of the individual team members. Research Method: Our study combines ethnographic observation with grounded theory to investigate how proposed solutions for an assigned design problem evolve over the course of a project. -
Associate Enablement Perspectives
CONFIDENTIAL 1H2020 Associate Enablement Perspectives DISCLAIMER: ComCap LLC make no representation or warranty, express or implied, in relation to the fairness, accuracy, correctness, completeness, or reliability of the information, opinions, or conclusions contained herein. ComCap LLC accepts no liability for any use of these materials. The materials are not intended to be relied upon as advice outside of a paid, approved use and they should not be considered a guarantee of any specific result. Each recipient should consult his or her own accounting, tax, financial, and other professional advisors when considering the scenarios and information provided. An introduction to ComCap ▪ ComCap is a premier boutique investment bank focused on the intersection of commerce and capital, with key focus on B2B SaaS, B2C e-commerce, payments, mobile commerce, marketplaces and B2B services for retail technologies (IT and marketing services, in-store, fulfillment, logistics, call center, analytics, personalization, location intelligence) ▪ Headquartered in San Francisco with European coverage from London & Moscow, and LATAM coverage from Sao Paulo. Our firm works with mid-cap public companies on buyside initiatives and public and private growth companies on financing and strategic M&A ▪ In addition to being the only boutique focused on disruptive commerce models, we differentiate by: ‒ Bringing bulge bracket techniques to emerging models; ‒ A strong and uncommon buyside/strategy practice; ‒ Deep understanding of industry drivers and synergy analyses; -
Read Dissertation
Doctoral Dissertation: The Journey towards a Growing Diffusion of Entrepreneurship Learning and Culture in Society Written by: Mirta Michilli Role DETAILS Author Name: Mirta Michilli, PhD Year: 2019 Title: The Journey towards a Growing Diffusion of Entrepreneurship Learning and Culture in Society Document type: Doctoral dissertation Institution: The International School of Management (ISM) URL: https://ism.edu/images/ismdocs/dissertations/michilli-phd- dissertation-2019.pdf International School of Management Ph.D. Program The Journey towards a Growing Diffusion of Entrepreneurship Learning and Culture in Society PhD Dissertation PhD candidate: Mirta Michilli 21st December 2019 Acknowledgments I wish to dedicate this work to Prof. Tullio De Mauro who many years ago believed in me and gave me the permission to add this challenge to the many I face every day as General Director of Fondazione Mondo Digitale. The effort I have sustained for many years has been first of all for myself, to satisfy my desire to learn and improve all the time, but it has also been for my fifteen year old son Rodrigo, who is building his life and to whom I wish the power of remaining always curious, hungry for knowledge, and capable of working hard and sacrificing for his dreams. I could have not been able to reach this doctorate without the support of my family: my mother, for having being present all the time I needed to be away, my sister, for showing me how to undertake continuous learning challenges and, above all, my beloved husband to whom I owe most of what I know and for dreaming with me endlessly. -
Research on Technology Entrepreneurship and Accelerators
RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND ACCELERATORS Essays on the emerging phenomenon of accelerators across Europe PhD Dissertation Jonas Van Hove 2018 Advisors: Prof. Dr. Bart Clarysse and Prof. Dr. Petra Andries A dissertation submitted to Ghent University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Applied Economics Academic year: 2017 – 2018 1 Copyright © 2018 by Jonas Van Hove All rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the author. 2 DOCTORAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Prof. dr. Bart Clarysse Ghent University, Belgium & ETH Zurich, Switzerland – administrative supervisor Prof. dr. Petra Andries Ghent University, Belgium – promotor Prof. dr. Johan Bruneel KU Leuven Campus Kortrijk, Belgium 3 4 LIST OF PUBLICATIONS AND CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS BASED ON THIS DOCTORAL RESEARCH Journal publications Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50: 13-24. Book chapters Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). A Look inside Accelerators in the United Kingdom: Building Businesses. Technology Entrepreneurship and Business Incubation: Theory, Practice, Lessons Learned. Imperial College Press, UK. Vanaelst, I., & Van Hove, J. (2017). Revolutionizing entrepreneurial ecosystems through a European accelerator policy. Accelerators: Successful Venture Creation and Growth. Edward Elgar Publishing. Van Hove, J., & Vanaelst, I. (2017). Revolutionizing entrepreneurial ecosystems through national and regional accelerator policy. Accelerators: Successful Venture Creation and Growth. Edward Elgar Publishing. Working papers Van Hove, J. (2017). -
View Whitepaper
INFRAREPORT Top M&A Trends in Infrastructure Software EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1 EVOLUTION OF CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE 7 1.1 Size of the Prize 7 1.2 The Evolution of the Infrastructure (Public) Cloud Market and Technology 7 1.2.1 Original 2006 Public Cloud - Hardware as a Service 8 1.2.2 2016 - 2010 - Platform as a Service 9 1.2.3 2016 - 2019 - Containers as a Service 10 1.2.4 Container Orchestration 11 1.2.5 Standardization of Container Orchestration 11 1.2.6 Hybrid Cloud & Multi-Cloud 12 1.2.7 Edge Computing and 5G 12 1.2.8 APIs, Cloud Components and AI 13 1.2.9 Service Mesh 14 1.2.10 Serverless 15 1.2.11 Zero Code 15 1.2.12 Cloud as a Service 16 2 STATE OF THE MARKET 18 2.1 Investment Trend Summary -Summary of Funding Activity in Cloud Infrastructure 18 3 MARKET FOCUS – TRENDS & COMPANIES 20 3.1 Cloud Providers Provide Enhanced Security, Including AI/ML and Zero Trust Security 20 3.2 Cloud Management and Cost Containment Becomes a Challenge for Customers 21 3.3 The Container Market is Just Starting to Heat Up 23 3.4 Kubernetes 24 3.5 APIs Have Become the Dominant Information Sharing Paradigm 27 3.6 DevOps is the Answer to Increasing Competition From Emerging Digital Disruptors. 30 3.7 Serverless 32 3.8 Zero Code 38 3.9 Hybrid, Multi and Edge Clouds 43 4 LARGE PUBLIC/PRIVATE ACQUIRERS 57 4.1 Amazon Web Services | Private Company Profile 57 4.2 Cloudera (NYS: CLDR) | Public Company Profile 59 4.3 Hortonworks | Private Company Profile 61 Infrastructure Software Report l Woodside Capital Partners l Confidential l October 2020 Page | 2 INFRAREPORT -
April 2020 Monthly Update
Sustainable Technology and Infrastructure Monthly Market Update // April 2020 Performance of Key Market Indices(1) 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 16.4% 9.8% 0.0% (1.1%) (20.0%) (8.5%) (40.0%) Apr-19 Jun-19 Aug-19 Oct-19 Dec-19 Feb-20 Apr-20 NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Dow Jones Industrial Average NASDAQ Composite S&P 500 Index Performance(1) April Ending Versus April YTD CY 2019 52 Wk High 52 Wk Low Dow Jones Industrial Average 11.1% (14.7%) 22.3% (17.6%) 30.9% NASDAQ Composite 15.4% (0.9%) 35.2% (9.4%) 29.6% S&P 500 12.7% (9.9%) 28.9% (14.0%) 30.2% NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy 21.8% (1.6%) 40.7% (21.0%) 44.6% Notable Recent Transactions & Capital Raises Target Acquirer Transaction Description Lime, a provider of micro-mobility products, acquired the IP and Boosted Lime assets of Boosted, a provider of electric skateboards, for an undisclosed sum First State Investments, an Australia-based infrastructure investor, M&A First State MVV Energie acquired a 45.1% interest in MVV Energie, a Germany-based Transactions Investments energy provider, for €753mm ($816mm) Nippon Nippon Suisan (Europe) and Marubeni jointly acquired a 67% Danish Suisan interest in Danish Salmon, an operator of a salmon farming Salmon business that specializes in the implementation of a recirculating Marubeni aquaculture system, for an undisclosed sum Company Transaction Description Kurly, a Korea-based developer of an online grocery delivery platform, raised a Kurly $150mm round led by Sequoia Capital, Hillhouse Capital and DST Global Capital Nio, a China-based electric vehicle manufacturer, raised a $1bn round led by Hefei Raises Nio Construction Investment Holding and New Technology Industrial Investment Co. -
2020 Philadelphia Venture Report
2020 PHILADELPHIA VENTURE REPORT Data provided by WE HELP BREAKTHROUGH IDEAS ACTUALLY BREAK THROUGH. We believe in the risk takers, the game-changers and the disruptors—those who committed to leveraging innovation to make the world a better place. Bridge Bank, founded in 2001 in Silicon Valley, serves small-market and middle-market businesses across many industries, as well as emerging technology and life sciences companies and the private equity community. Geared to serving both venture-backed and non-venture-backed companies across all stages of growth, Bridge Bank offers a broad scope of financial solutions including growth capital, equipment and working capital credit facilities, venture debt, treasury management, asset-based lending, SBA and commercial real estate loans, ESOP finance and full line of international products and services. To learn more about us, visit info.bridgebank.com/tech-innovation. Matt Klinger Brian McCabe Senior Director, Technology Banking Senior Director, Technology Banking [email protected] [email protected] (703) 547-8198 (703) 345-9307 Bridge Bank, a division of Western Alliance Bank. Member FDIC. *All offers of credit are subject to approval. Introduction 2020 was a watershed moment on so many fronts. The COVID-19 pandemic will forever change how we live, work, and interact. The killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and countless others have brought focus and urgency to attacking racism, racial injustice, and the resulting inequities in our society. Philadelphia has always been a city fueled by passion and determination to challenge the status quo, think differently, invent, and push forward together. This report showcases the fruits of that passion in the form of capital raised to fuel innovation. -
Enterprise Tech 30—The 2021 List
Enterprise Tech 30—The 2021 List Rajeev Chand Partner Head of Research The Enterprise Tech 30 is an exclusive list of the most promising private Peter Wagner companies in enterprise technology. The list, which is in its third year, is Founding Partner based on an institutional research and survey process with 103 leading venture capitalists, who are identified and invited based on their track Jake Flomenberg Partner record, expertise, and reputation for discernment. Olivia Rodberg The Enterprise Tech 30 is now a platform for the startup community: a Research Associate watershed recognition for the 30 companies and a practical and February 24, 2021 invaluable resource for customers, partners, journalists, prospective team members, service providers, and deal makers, among others. We are pleased to present the Enterprise Tech 30 for 2021. Wing Venture Capital 480 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 Early Mid Late 1. Modern Treasury 1. Zapier 1. HashiCorp 2. Privacera 2. Fishtown Analytics 2. Stripe 3. Roam Research 3. Retool 3. Databricks 4. Panther Labs 4. Netlify 4. GitLab 5. Snorkel AI 5. Notion 5. Airtable 6. Linear 6. Grafana Labs 6. Figma 7. ChartHop 7. Abnormal Security 7. Confluent 8. Substack 8. Gatsby 8. Canva 9. Monte Carlo 9. Superhuman 9. LaunchDarkly 10. Census 10. Miro 10. Auth0 Special Calendly 1 2021 The Curious Case of Calendly This year’s Enterprise Tech 30 has 31 companies rather than 30 due to the “curious case” of Calendly. Calendly, a meeting scheduling company, was categorized as Early-Stage when the ET30 voting process started on January 11 as the company had raised $550,000. -
The Startup Factories. the Rise of Accelerator Programmes
Discussion paper: June 2011 The Startup Factories The rise of accelerator programmes to support new technology ventures Paul Miller and Kirsten Bound NESTA is the UK’s foremost independent expert on how innovation can solve some of the country’s major economic and social challenges. Its work is enabled by an endowment, funded by the National Lottery, and it operates at no cost to the government or taxpayer. NESTA is a world leader in its field and carries out its work through a blend of experimental programmes, analytical research and investment in early- stage companies. www.nesta.org.uk Executive summary Over the past six years, a new method of incubating technology startups has emerged, driven by investors and successful tech entrepreneurs: the accelerator programme. Despite growing interest in the model from the investment, business education and policy communities, there have been few attempts at formal analysis.1 This report is a first step towards a more informed critique of the phenomenon, as part of a broader effort among both public and private sectors to understand how to better support the growth of innovative startups. The accelerator programme model comprises five main features. The combination of these sets it apart from other approaches to investment or business incubation: • An application process that is open to all, yet highly competitive. • Provision of pre-seed investment, usually in exchange for equity. • A focus on small teams not individual founders. • Time-limited support comprising programmed events and intensive mentoring. • Cohorts or ‘classes’ of startups rather than individual companies. The number of accelerator programmes has grown rapidly in the US over the past few years and there are signs that more recently, the trend is being replicated in Europe. -
OGC 2015 Programbook.Pdf
CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHT Conference Opening 09:15 - 10:00, 29 August 2015, Saturday At Osmanthus Hall Plenary Talk I Optical fibres: The next Generation – Prof. Sir David Payne, University of Southampton, UK 10:00 - 10:45, 29 August 2015, Saturday At Osmanthus Hall Plenary Talk II Using Metamaterials to Manipulate Light – Prof. Che-Ting Chan, HKUST, HK 11:15 - 12:00, 29 August 2015, Saturday At Osmanthus Hall Best Paper Award Session 11:15 - 12:00, 29 August 2015, Saturday At Lotus 4, Lotus 5 & Lotus 6 Workshop 1. Fiber-Based Technologies 09:30 - 12:20, 30 August 2015, Sunday At Rose 3 Workshop 2. Optoelectronics Technopreneurship 09:30 - 12:20, 30 August 2015, Sunday At Rose 2 Workshop 3. Metro Optical Transmission (Huawei) 13:30 - 17:00, 29 August 2015, Saturday At Rose 3 2 TABLE OF CONTENT CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHT .................................................................................................................................... 2 TABLE OF CONTENT ............................................................................................................................................. 3 WELCOME MESSAGE ........................................................................................................................................... 4 SPONSORSHIP ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 ORGANIZING COMMITTEE..................................................................................................................................