DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Transportation System Performance Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Transportation System Performance Evaluation 2020 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The Council’s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region Metropolitan Council Members Charlie Zelle Chair Raymond Zeran District 9 Judy Johnson District 1 Peter Lindstrom District 10 Reva Chamblis District 2 Susan Vento District 11 Christopher Ferguson District 3 Francisco J. Gonzalez District 12 Deb Barber District 4 Chai Lee District 13 Molly Cummings District 5 Kris Fredson District 14 Lynnea Atlas-Ingebretson District 6 Phillip Sterner District 15 Robert Lilligren District 7 Wendy Wulff District 16 Abdirahman Muse District 8 The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning organization for the seven-county Twin Cities area. The Council operates the regional bus and rail system, collects and treats wastewater, coordinates regional water resources, plans and helps fund regional parks, and administers federal funds that provide housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income individuals and families. The 17-member Council board is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the governor. On request, this publication will be made available in alternative formats to people with disabilities. Call Metropolitan Council information at 651-602-1140 or TTY 651-291-0904. Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................ES-1 2040 Transportation Policy Plan: Updated Regional Transportation ........................................ ES-1 Scope of this Report ................................................................................................................ ES-2 Findings and Conclusions........................................................................................................ ES-3 Chapter 1: The Purpose .......................................................................................................... 1 Scope of this Report ...................................................................................................................... 2 2040 Transportation Policy Plan: Updated Regional Transportation Benchmarks ......................... 3 Chapter 2: The Region and Travel .......................................................................................... 7 Twin Cities Metropolitan Planning Organization Planning Area: Demographics ............................. 7 How the Region Moves: Multimodal Transportation ..................................................................... 28 Chapter 3: The Highway System ........................................................................................... 37 Characteristics of the Regional Highway System ......................................................................... 37 Peer Regions ............................................................................................................................... 63 Findings and Conclusions............................................................................................................ 68 Chapter 4: The Transit System ............................................................................................. 70 Transit in the Twin Cities ............................................................................................................. 70 Peer Transit Systems .................................................................................................................. 96 Successes and Opportunities .................................................................................................... 105 Findings and Conclusions.......................................................................................................... 109 Chapter 5: The Freight System ........................................................................................... 110 Characteristics of the Regional Freight System ......................................................................... 110 Highway System ........................................................................................................................ 113 Rail Freight System ................................................................................................................... 117 Water......................................................................................................................................... 126 Findings and Conclusions.......................................................................................................... 128 Chapter 6: The Bicycle and Pedestrian System .................................................................. 130 Characteristics of the Regional Bicycle System ......................................................................... 131 Walking and Bicycling for Transportation ................................................................................... 137 Findings and Conclusions.......................................................................................................... 142 Chapter 7: The Aviation System .......................................................................................... 144 Characteristics of the Regional Aviation System ........................................................................ 144 Operations ................................................................................................................................. 153 Peer Region Comparison .......................................................................................................... 158 Findings and Conclusions.......................................................................................................... 161 Executive Summary This report is a comprehensive review of the Twin Cities transportation system as prepared by Metropolitan Council in 2020. The Minnesota State Legislature adopted statutes in 1996 requiring the Metropolitan Council to produce this report (previously called the Transportation System Audit). This report was prepared to inform the 2020 update of the region’s long-range transportation plan, the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (2040 TPP). 2040 Transportation Policy Plan: Updated Regional Transportation Benchmarks Minnesota has a long and respected history of performance measures are now incorporated into performance- based transportation planning, the Transportation System Performance operations, and decision- making. The 2040 TPP Evaluation. advances this philosophy and identifies six goals for the regional transportation system, including a Transportation System Stewardship framework for how to achieve them. The goals identified in the 2040 TPP include: Sustainable investments in the transportation system are protected by strategically preserving, maintaining, and • Transportation system stewardship operating system assets. • Safety and security • Access to destinations Safety and Security • Competitive economy The regional transportation system is safe • Healthy environment and secure for all users. • Leveraging transportation investment to guide land use Access to Destinations People and businesses prosper by using a These goals can directly contribute to the vision reliable, affordable, and efficient multimodal in Thrive MSP 2040, the Metropolitan Council’s transportation system that connects them to long-term comprehensive development guide for destinations throughout the region and beyond. the seven-county Twin Cities area that provides the vision for our region’s future. The 2040 TPP Competitive Economy goals and objectives respond to Thrive’s policy direction and tie to the regional outcomes it The regional transportation system supports the economic competitiveness, vitality, and identifies. The 2040 TPP links each goal with one prosperity of the region and state. or more of the Thrive outcomes: Healthy Environment • Stewardship • The regional transportation system Prosperity advances equity and contributes to • Equity communities’ livability and sustainability • while protecting the natural, cultural, and Livability developed environments. • Sustainability Leveraging Transportation Investment to Consistent with Minnesota practice and U.S. Guide Land Use Department of Transportation requirements, the The region leverages transportation Council is also working to develop performance investments to guide land use and measures and targets to evaluate the development patterns that advance the regional vision of stewardship, prosperity, effectiveness of our region’s actions on achieving livability, equity, and sustainability. these goals and outcomes. When relevant, these Page – ES-1 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Scope of this Report This document reviews the changing demographics of the region, focusing on population and employment changes from 2013 to 2018. The review of demographics includes Each modal chapter includes an 2000 and 2010 US Census data, as well as 2017 existing system description, a American Community Survey data. There are review of the system some areas where the 2019 Transportation performance where data is Behavior Inventory (TBI) data has been used. available, and a discussion of The various modes of transportation (highways, issues and trends for that transit, freight, bicycle and pedestrian, aviation) system, called Findings and are reviewed within their own chapters. Conclusions. Comparisons to peer regions are made where applicable. Each modal chapter includes an existing system description, a review of the system performance where data is available, and a discussion of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee October 29, 2014 Full
    MEETING OF THE REGIONAL TRANSIT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. SCAG Los Angeles Main Office 818 W. 7th Street, 12th Floor, Policy Committee Room A Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 236-1800 Teleconferencing Available: Please RSVP with Ed Rodriguez at [email protected] 24 hours in advance. Videoconferencing Available: Orange SCAG Office Ventura SCAG Office 600 S. Main St, Ste. 906 Orange, CA 92863 950 County Square Dr, Ste 101 Ventura, CA 93003 Imperial SCAG Office Riverside SCAG Office 1405 North Imperial Ave., Suite 1 , CA 92243 3403 10th Street, Suite 805 Riverside, CA 92501 SCAG San Bernardino Office 1170 W. 3rd St, Ste. 140 San Bernardino, CA 92410 If members of the public wish to review the attachments or have any questions on any of the agenda items, please contact Matt Gleason at (213) 236-1832 or [email protected]. REGIONALTRANSIT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA October 29, 2014 The Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee may consider and act upon any TIME PG# of the items listed on the agenda regardless of whether they are listed as information or action items. 1.0 CALL TO ORDER (Wayne Wassell, Metro, Regional Transit TAC Chair) 2.0 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD - Members of the public desiring to speak on items on the agenda, or items not on the agenda, but within the purview of the Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee, must fill out and present a speaker’s card to the assistant prior to speaking. Comments will be limited to three minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Council 2020 Capital Budget With
    Metropolitan Council Projects Summary ($ in thousands) Project Requests for Gov's Gov's Planning State Funds Rec Estimates Project Title Rank Fund 2020 2022 2024 2020 2022 2024 Busway Capital Improvement Program Bus 1 GO 55,000 50,000 50,000 55,000 0 0 Rapid Transit Regional Parks and Trails Grant Program 2 GO 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Inflow and Infiltration Grant Program 3 GO 9,500 9,500 9,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total Project Requests 79,500 74,500 74,500 70,000 15,000 15,000 General Obligation Bonds (GO) Total 79,500 74,500 74,500 70,000 15,000 15,000 State of Minnesota Final Capital Budget Requests January 2020 Page 1 Metropolitan Council Agency Profile metrocouncil.org/ AT A GLANCE • 3.1 million residents in the seven-county area in 2017 (55 percent of total state population) • 888,000 more people from 2010 to 2040 (31% increase) per Council forecasts • 419,000 more households from 2010 to 2040 (38% increase) per Council forecasts • 495,000 more jobs from 2010 to 2040 (32% increase) per Council forecasts • 94.2 million transit rides in 2017 • 2.38 million rides on Metro Mobility in 2017 • 250 million gallons of wastewater treated daily • 110 communities provided with wastewater treatment in 2018 • Nine treatment plants and 600 miles of regional sewers • 59 million regional park visits in 2017 • 56 regional parks and park reserves totaling 55,000 acres in the seven-county metropolitan area • 49 regional trails totaling nearly 400 miles • 7,200 low-income households provided affordable housing by the Council’s Metro HRA in 2017 PURPOSE The Metropolitan Council is the regional policy-making body, planning agency, and provider of essential services for the Twin Cities metropolitan region.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Work Session Agenda Section Work Session Meeting Date April 5, 2021
    CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION MEETING DATE APRIL 5, 2021 ITEM: BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) LINES DEPARTMENT: Public Works BY/DATE: Kevin Hansen/April 1, 2021 CITY STRATEGY: (please indicate areas that apply by adding a bold “X” in front of the selected text below) X_Safe Community _Diverse, Welcoming “Small-Town” Feel _Economic Strength _Excellent Housing/Neighborhoods _Equity and Affordability X_Strong Infrastructure/Public Services _Opportunities for Play and Learning _Engaged, Multi-Generational, Multi-Cultural Population BACKGROUND: ‘NetworkNext’ is a 20-year plan initiated by Metro Transit for expanding and improving the bus network serving the metro area. Transit improvements under consideration include improved local and express routes, integrated shared mobility options, and new arterial bus rapid transit (BRT) lines. Bus rapid transit (BRT) provides an improved customer experience with frequent service and faster trips in our the Metro’s busiest bus corridors. Metro Transit first studied a dozen potential BRT lines in 2011-2012. This study led to the implementation of the METRO A Line in 2016 and the METRO C Line in 2019. Metro Transit has reported both lines have been very successful in increasing ridership and customers satisfaction. In 2020 and 2021, Metro Transit engaged the public to help identify the Metro’s next BRT priorities. Each step was based on four principles that guided the planning process for BRT, rooted in public engagement, Metropolitan Council transit policy, and the performance of the bus network: Advance equity and reduce regional racial disparities Build on success to grow ridership Design a network that supports a transit-oriented lifestyle Ensure the long-term sustainable growth of the bus network In February 2021, following months of analysis and community engagement, Metro Transit finalized recommendations for the next expansions in the BRT network: The METRO F Line will serve the Central Avenue corridor, modifying Route 10 from downtown Minneapolis to Northtown Mall via Central and University avenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Session Virtual Meeting Held Via Webex December 8, 2020 6:15 Pm
    WORK SESSION VIRTUAL MEETING HELD VIA WEBEX DECEMBER 8, 2020 6:15 PM Call to order 1. Metropolitan Transit Project Manager Shahin Khazrajafari will be presenting an overview of the forthcoming Metro Transit D Line Bus Rapid Transit project, the anticipated construction timeline, and will be available to answer any questions. Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738. AGENDA SECTION: Work Session Items AGENDA ITEM # 1. WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT NO. 31 WORK SESSION 12/8/2020 REPORT PREPARED BY: Joe Powers, Assistant City Engineer DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Kristin Asher, Public Works Director/City Engineer 12/2/2020 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 12/2/2020 ITEM FOR WORK SESSION: Metropolitan Transit Project Manager Shahin Khazrajafari will be presenting an overview of the forthcoming Metro Transit D Line Bus Rapid Transit project, the anticipated construction timeline, and will be available to answer any questions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Metro Transit is moving towards construction of planned improvements to the Route 5 corridor with the D Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project after securing final project funding at the legislature in the recent bonding bill. The project will be a positive asset to the City of Richfield and enhance the overall metro transit system in our region. The D Line will substantially replace Route 5, running primarily on Portland Avenue within Richfield and on Chicago, Emerson and Fremont Avenues in Minneapolis. Rapid bus brings better amenities, such as: Faster, more frequent service; Pre-boarding fare payment for faster stops; Neighborhood-scale stations with amenities; Enhanced security; and, Larger & specialized vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning a Public Transportation System with a View Towards Passengers’ Convenience
    Planning a Public Transportation System with a View Towards Passengers’ Convenience by Jonas Harbering Planning a Public Transportation System with a View Towards Passengers’ Convenience Dissertation zur Erlangung des mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades ”Doctor rerum naturalium” der Georg-August-Universit¨atG¨ottingen im Promotionsprogramm ”PhD School of Mathematical Sciences” (SMS) der Georg-August University School of Science (GAUSS) vorgelegt von Jonas Harbering aus Flemhude G¨ottingen,2015 Betreuungsausschuss Prof. Dr. Anita Sch¨obel, Institut f¨urNumerische und Angewandte Mathematik, Georg- August-Universit¨atG¨ottingen Prof. Dr. Stephan Westphal, Institut f¨urAngewandte Stochastik und Operations Research, Technische Universit¨atClausthal Mitglieder der Pr¨ufungskommision Referentin: Prof. Dr. Anita Sch¨obel, Institut f¨urNumerische und Angewandte Mathe- matik, Georg-August-Universit¨atG¨ottingen Koreferent: Prof. Dr. Juan Antonio Mesa, Institut f¨urAngewandte Mathematik, Univer- sit¨atSevilla Weitere Mitglieder der Pr¨ufungskommision Prof. Dr. Stephan Westphal, Institut f¨urAngewandte Stochastik und Operations Research, Technische Universit¨atClausthal Prof. Dr. Andrea Krajina, Institut f¨urMathematische Stochastik, Georg-August-Universit¨at G¨ottingen Prof. Dr. Preda Mihailescu, Mathematisches Institut, Georg-August-Universit¨atG¨ottingen Prof. Dr. Jens Grabowski, Institut f¨urInformatik, Georg-August-Universit¨atG¨ottingen Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung: 1. Februar 2016 ii Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. General Literature
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Bus Rapid Transit Feasiblity Study
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 MODES AND TRENDS THAT FACILITATE BRT ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Microtransit ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Shared Mobility .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Mobility Hubs ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Curbside Management .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 3 VEHICLES THAT SUPPORT BRT OPERATIONS ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Automated Vehicles .................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rush Line Bus Rapid Transit Station Area Planning Overview: White Bear Lake May 2020
    RUSH LINE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STATION AREA PLANNING OVERVIEW: WHITE BEAR LAKE MAY 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1. What is Station Area Planning? ................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Preliminary Station Area Planning ............................................................................................. 2 1.3. Available Implementation Resources......................................................................................... 8 1.4. Advanced Station Area Planning ............................................................................................. 10 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Rush Line BRT Project Advisory Committees ....................................................................... 2 Figure 2: White Bear Lake Area Rush Line BRT Stations .................................................................... 4 Figure 3: White Bear Lake Demographic Characteristics ..................................................................... 5 Figure 4: White Bear Lake Employment Characteristics ...................................................................... 6 Figure 5: Six-Step Framework for Health Impact Assessments ........................................................... 7 i The Rush Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project is a 15-mile proposed transit route with stops between Union Depot in Lowertown Saint Paul and downtown White Bear Lake. The project is currently in the environmental analysis phase, during which the project’s design is advanced while
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax County Transit Network
    Fairfax Connector Service Metrobus Service Metrorail Service Map Symbols Weekday, Saturday, and/or Sunday Service Rush Hour Only Service Limited-Stop and Express Service Metro MWY Metroway REX Orange Line Yellow Line Government Metrorail Station Middle School fairfaxconnector.com 630 301 432 557 641 924 Building FAIRFAX CONNECTOR Seasonal For Metrobus information visit wmata.com Blue Line Silver Line 340 558 640 981 305 461 622 642 926 396 or call 202-637-7000, TTY 202-962-2033 For Metrorail information visit wmata.com Transit Station Hospital High School 703-339-7200 TTY 703-339-1608 306 350 559 650 335 462 623 644 927 697 or call 202-637-7000, TTY 202-962-2033 City of Fairfax CUE Service BusTracker Park & Ride Police Station College/University 371 341 552 624 651 929 Service during most weekday hours. May also Virginia Railway Express (VRE) Service REAL-TIME SERVICE INFORMATION operate on Saturday and/or Sunday. GOLD GREEN @ffxconnector fairfaxconnector 467 351 553 631 652 980 Service during select weekday hours. Manassas Line Fredericksburg Line VRE Station Library Recreation Center 306 BEAC (Off-Peak or Rush Hour). May also operate For City of Fairfax CUE information visit H MILL 372 554 632 722 RD Fairfax County Department of Transportation (FCDOT) ensures nondiscrimination in all programs and activities in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of on Saturday and/or Sunday. cuebus.org or call 703-385-7859, TTY 711 For VRE information visit vre.org or call (800) RIDE-VRE (743-3873) Limited-Stop or Express Service. Most operate Connector Store Airport 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
    [Show full text]
  • Route C Line
    C LINE Local Bus Route metrotransit.org | 612-373-3333 Effective 6/13/20 This route is part of the Brooklyn Center High Frequency network and Transit Center operates at least every 15 minutes 1 Brooklyn Center 5 19 22 717 weekdays from 6 am–7 pm and Transit Center Saturdays from 9 am–6 pm. 721 722 723 724 See schedule for details. 761 762 801 Xerxes & 56th Ave Timepoint on schedule BROOKLYN Find the timepoint nearest your stop, and Xerxes CENTER use that column of the schedule. Your stop Brooklyn & 51st Ave may be between timepoints. 22 32 761 51st Ave METRO C Line (rapid bus) Bus will pick up or drop off customers at Brooklyn Blvd any station along this route METRO Blue Line (light rail) Trains will pick up or drop off customers at Patrick Henry any station along this route. High School METRO Green Line (light rail) 2 Penn & 43rd Ave Trains will pick up or drop off customers at any station along this route. Connecting Routes See those route schedules for details. Penn & Dowling Downtown Zone Ride in the Downtown Zone for 50¢ Penn & 36th Ave Penn Go-To Card Retail Locations Lowry 19 32 3 Penn & Lowry W Broadway Penn & 29th Ave A refillable Go-To Card is the most convenient way to travel by transit! 14 Buy a Go-To Card or add value to an Penn & West Broadway existing card at one of these locations MINNEAPOLIS or online. Golden Valley 14 Penn & Golden Valley BROOKLYN CENTER Northpoint Health and Wellness Center • Cub Foods: 3245 Co Rd 10 Plymouth 7 32 Penn & Plymouth MINNEAPOLIS 7th St • Metro Check Cashing: 2211 Lowry Ave N 5 Metro Transit • Metro Transit Service Center: 22 Lost and Found Olson Mem Hwy 719 Marquette Ave 755 4 5 Target Field • Unbank: 727 Hennepin Ave Target Center Nicollet Mall Olson & Penn 7th St & Hennepin Holiday service operates on New Year’s Olson & BryantOlson & 7th St 10th St 3rd Ave Olson & Humboldt 7th St & Nicollet Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, 9 Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas.
    [Show full text]
  • East-West Corridor High Capacity Transit Plan Rapid Transit Evaluation Results
    East-West Corridor High Capacity Transit Plan Rapid Transit Evaluation Results About the Corridor The AECOM consultant team conducted a high-level analysis of commuter rail, light rail transit (LRT), streetcar and bus rapid transit (BRT) to determine the most appropriate mode for the East- West Corridor. Based on the corridor fit, ridership capacity, cost per mile to build/operate and available right-of-way, BRT will move forward for more detailed analysis. This fact sheet provides, in more detail, how BRT and LRT compared and why BRT was determined to be the best fit. BRT with LRT Screening Results Below are the similarities and differences between bus rapid transit (BRT) and light rail transit (LRT). Features Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Light Rail Transit (LRT) Service Frequency Frequent service during peak hrs. (5–15 min.) Frequent service during peak hrs. (5–15 min.) Typical Corridor Length 5–25 mi. 10–20 mi. Range of Operating Speed 25–55 MPH 30–55 MPH Right-of-Way Dedicated lanes and/or mixed traffic Dedicated lanes with overhead electrical systems Typical Station Spacing ½ and one mile apart One mile apart, outside of downtowns Level boarding at high-quality stations Level boarding at high-quality stations Vehicle Types 40- or 60-ft. buses that have multiple doors 1–3 car trains; low floor vehicles Technology Traffic signal priority Traffic signal priority Real-time passenger info Real-time passenger info Off-board fare payment Off-board fare payment Typical Operating Cost per Hr. $100–$200 $200–$400 Typical Capital Cost per Mi. $2.5 million–$20 million $140 million+ Ridership Capacity by Mode Best Poor Current East-West Corridor Ridership (6.9k–8.7k riders) Modern Streetcar Light Rail Transit (1.5k–6k riders) (20k–90k riders) Bus Rapid Transit (4k–15k riders) Commuter Rail (3k–20k riders) Ridership Mode Capacity by 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 The chart above demonstrates that BRT and commuter rail both have the needed capacity to meet ridership needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Support Material Agenda Item No
    Support Material Agenda Item No. 17 Board of Directors Meeting November 4, 2020 10:00 AM MEETING ACCESSIBLE VIA ZOOM AT: https://gosbcta.zoom.us/j/99354182777 Teleconference Dial: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 993 5418 2777 CONSENT CALENDAR Transit 17. Task 3: Innovative Transit Review of the Metro-Valley Receive and file Task 3: Innovative Transit Review of the Metro-Valley Report. Task 3: Innovative Transit Review Report is being provided as a separate attachment. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY CONSOLIDATION STUDY AND INNOVATIVE TRANSIT REVIEW TASK 3—INNOVATIVE TRANSIT ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS OCTOBER 1, 2020 This page intentionally left blank. CONSOLIDATION STUDY AND INNOVATIVE TRANSIT REVIEW TASK 3—INNOVATIVE TRANSIT ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SUBMITTAL (VERSION 2.0) PROJECT NO.: 12771C70, TASK NO. 3 202012771C70, TASK NO. 3 2020 DATE: OCTOBER 1, 2020 WSP SUITE 350 862 E. HOSPITALITY LANE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 TEL.: +1 909 888-1106 FAX: +1 909 889-1884 WSP.COM This page intentionally left blank. October 1, 2020 Beatriz Valdez, Director of Special Projects and Strategic Initiatives San Bernardino County Transportation Authority 1170 W. Third Street, 1st Floor San Bernardino, CA 92410 Dear Ms.Valdez: Client ref.: Contract No. C14086, CTO No. 70 Contract No. C14086, CTO No. 70 WSP is pleased to submit this Draft Task 3 Innovative Service Analysis and Concepts Report as part of the Consolidation Study and Innovative Transit Review. Upon receipt of comments from SBCTA and your partners, we will prepare and submit a final version of this report. Yours sincerely, Cliff Henke AVP/Project Leader, Global ZEB/BRT Coordinator XX/xx Encl.
    [Show full text]
  • Ride Into Summer with Metrolink
    5 6 JUNE | JULY 2014 GO SMART WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO FARE CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS UNDERWAY ADJUSTMENT NEW Go511 APP EFFECTIVE Go511 offers commuters Construction began earlier this year on two major projects — the rail, bus rapid transit, along with local and regional bus services. The Transit JULY 1! and riders a smarter way to Downtown San Bernardino Passenger Rail Project and the San Bernardino Center will provide enhanced benefits to current transit users and make travel. You’ll get up-to-the- Transit Center – that will make commuting to and from the Inland Empire these travel modes more attractive to future riders in the region. With 13 easier. Instead of ending at the historic Santa Fe Depot, the Downtown San local Omnitrans bus routes, the new sbX Bus Rapid Transit service, Victor IMPORTANT NEWS FOR YOUR COMMUTE minute traffic updates plus RIDE INTO SUMMER real-time and scheduled Bernardino Passenger Rail Project will extend Metrolink’s track one mile Valley Transit Authority, Mountain Area Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) bus In April 2004, the Metrolink Board of Directors approved a 10-year transit information for five east and connect with the future San Bernardino Transit Center. As a result service, and Metrolink trains all connecting at this central hub, connectivity fare restructuring program beginning July 1, 2005, which changed the counties in Southern Cali- of the construction activity, Metrolink will be implementing modifications to within the Inland Empire will be more efficient than ever. Metrolink fare structure from a zone-based system to a driving fornia: Los Angeles, Orange, schedules and train set sizes to accommodate the projects.
    [Show full text]