Planning a Public Transportation System with a View Towards Passengers’ Convenience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Planning a Public Transportation System with a View Towards Passengers’ Convenience Planning a Public Transportation System with a View Towards Passengers’ Convenience by Jonas Harbering Planning a Public Transportation System with a View Towards Passengers’ Convenience Dissertation zur Erlangung des mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades ”Doctor rerum naturalium” der Georg-August-Universit¨atG¨ottingen im Promotionsprogramm ”PhD School of Mathematical Sciences” (SMS) der Georg-August University School of Science (GAUSS) vorgelegt von Jonas Harbering aus Flemhude G¨ottingen,2015 Betreuungsausschuss Prof. Dr. Anita Sch¨obel, Institut f¨urNumerische und Angewandte Mathematik, Georg- August-Universit¨atG¨ottingen Prof. Dr. Stephan Westphal, Institut f¨urAngewandte Stochastik und Operations Research, Technische Universit¨atClausthal Mitglieder der Pr¨ufungskommision Referentin: Prof. Dr. Anita Sch¨obel, Institut f¨urNumerische und Angewandte Mathe- matik, Georg-August-Universit¨atG¨ottingen Koreferent: Prof. Dr. Juan Antonio Mesa, Institut f¨urAngewandte Mathematik, Univer- sit¨atSevilla Weitere Mitglieder der Pr¨ufungskommision Prof. Dr. Stephan Westphal, Institut f¨urAngewandte Stochastik und Operations Research, Technische Universit¨atClausthal Prof. Dr. Andrea Krajina, Institut f¨urMathematische Stochastik, Georg-August-Universit¨at G¨ottingen Prof. Dr. Preda Mihailescu, Mathematisches Institut, Georg-August-Universit¨atG¨ottingen Prof. Dr. Jens Grabowski, Institut f¨urInformatik, Georg-August-Universit¨atG¨ottingen Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung: 1. Februar 2016 ii Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. General Literature Overview 5 2.1 Network Design........................................ 7 2.2 Line Planning......................................... 9 2.3 Timetabling.......................................... 11 2.4 Delay Management...................................... 13 3. Paper Summaries 15 3.1 Minimizing the passengers’ traveling time in the stop location problem......... 16 by E. Carrizosa, J. Harbering, A. Sch¨obel Published at ATMOS 2013 Proceedings, 14 pages paper Revision submitted to the Journal of Operational Research Society, 24 pages paper 3.2 Generation of Line Pools .................................. 20 by P. Gattermann, J. Harbering, A. Sch¨obel Published at CASPT 2015 Proceedings, 17 pages paper Submitted to the journal Public Transport, 20 pages paper 3.3 Delay Resistant Line Planning with a View Towards Passenger Transfers . 23 by J. Harbering Revision submitted to the Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 21 pages paper 3.4 Single Track Train Scheduling................................ 28 by J. Harbering, A. Ranade, M. Schmidt, O. Sinnen Published at MISTA 2015 Proceedings, 16 pages paper Submitted to Journal of Scheduling, 20 pages paper 3.5 Network-based Source Detection for Propagation Processes on Complex Networks with Application to Train Delays on Railway Systems .................... 34 by J. Manitz, J. Harbering, M. Schmidt, T. Kneib, A. Sch¨obel Published at IWSM 2014 Proceedings, 5 pages paper Submitted to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C, 48 pages paper 4. Discussion of Results 39 5. Conclusion and Future Work 43 6. Own Contribution 45 Bibliography 46 Addenda 57 Addendum A: Minimizing the passengers’ traveling time in the stop location problem . 57 Addendum B: Generation of Line Pools ............................ 91 Addendum C: Delay Resistant Line Planning with a View Towards Passenger Transfers . 119 Addendum D: Single Track Train Scheduling .........................151 Addendum E: Network-based Source Detection for Propagation Processes on Complex Networks with Application to Train Delays on Railway Systems . 177 iii 1. Introduction Public transportation is increasingly used by passengers. Ever more people intend to travel on longer distances using public transportation. The consequence for operators is that they have to provide sufficient capacity in order to satisfy passengers’ demand. How- ever, public transportation operators are facing difficulties as costs are also increasing. Examples for influencing cost factors are labor wages and energy consumption. Statistics on public transportation demand and influencing cost factors are provided by [Eur15]. Finally, also political goals are embodied in this topic. As public transportation is con- sidered to be safer and more sustainable than, e.g., private transportation, (see [Ban08]) there is a political will to support public transportation usage [OEC15]. In order to provide a guidance on how to deal with the difficulties and how to achieve efficiency goals, an intergovernmental organization, the ”International Transportation Fo- rum”, consisting of 57 member countries, was created in 2006. The forum describes their aim ”to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transportation in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of trans- portation policy” (see [ITF15]). As such, they are regularly publishing discussion papers stating the role of current and future research areas. Two recent papers are concerned with the improvement of railways, emphasizing on crucial factors from the operators’ perspective ([MBP15]) and from passengers’ view ([WAC+14]). In [MBP15] the efficiency aspect of railway operators is further analyzed, stating that key indicators are, among others, passenger transportation operators’ revenue to cost ratio, infrastructure managers’ revenue to cost ratio, utilization of railway infrastructure, and utilization of freight/passenger transportation operators. Putting this differently, important values for both freight and passenger transportation operators are: generalized costs including, e.g., marketing costs, labor costs, train operating costs, • and maintenance costs of fleet and infrastructure, revenue from passengers or companies transporting freight or demanding freight • 1 transport, and utilization of freight and passenger train capacity. • See [MBP15] for a more detailed analysis of efficiency indicators. This thesis is mainly concerned with problems arising in the area of passenger transport. Elaborating on passengers’ perception of railway services, [WAC+14] reviews the key factors of the convenience of passengers, or short passenger convenience. The elements found to compose the convenience perception of passengers are: Accessibility, described by access and egress time. Also the walking time during the • journey is embodied in this element. Time spent waiting at any stage of the journey. • Availability, firstly in terms of the frequency in the timetable, i.e., the number of • planned services. Secondly, in terms of the timetable due to delays, i.e., the number of actual services. The number of transfers. This inconvenience element is meant to be in addition to • the time spent waiting. Variability in the traveling time due to unforeseen reasons. • The amount and quality of information provided. • Crowding due to overloaded trains. • For a more detailed analysis of passenger convenience elements, see [WAC+14]. These two position papers summarize very extensively the two main contradicting goals of railways operations, namely, reducing operators’ costs and improving passengers’ con- venience. In this thesis different aspects of these contradicting views are analyzed in the presented publications. Mainly, passenger convenience goals are addressed without losing sight of the operators’ perspective. In [CHS14] (see Addendum A) an estimate for passengers’ traveling time is min- • imized and an acceptable distance to access the rail system for the passengers is ensured. Two integer programming formulations are proposed and, together with an additional integer program from literature, their performances are compared. In this work passengers’ traveling time as well as access and egress time are considered. Thus, this work mainly addresses passenger convenience. The summary of this work is given in Section 3.1. 2 In [GHS15a] (see Addendum B) line pools, composing sets of potential lines, are • generated with a focus on generalized costs and a simultaneous view on passenger transfers. An algorithm solving the arising model is proposed and various influential parameters are analyzed. This work can be classified to consider both operator costs and passenger convenience. It is summarized in Section 3.2. The objective of [Har15] (see Addendum C) is to find lines which minimize passenger • transfers. Thereby, it is intended to show that the resulting lines serve well in order to combat delays. In order to ensure that not too many lines are used, we bound the number of trains on each edge. The resulting model is formulated as an integer program and a heuristic algorithm is proposed to solve the program. This work mainly addresses passenger convenience in two aspects, which are passenger transfers and availability, but also regards the costs. The summary of this work can be found in Section 3.3. The work [HRS15] (see Addendum D) focuses on the utilization of railway infrastruc- • ture. It is motivated by the situation in India, in which trains are highly overloaded and using the infrastructure more efficiently is striven for. This work states a model for the optimal utilization of the infrastructure and is concerned with the complexity of the problem. The utilization of the infrastructure is, in the first place, one of the major cost aspects. However, also important elements of passengers’ convenience are addressed. Hence, this work emphasizes on both costs and passenger convenience perspectives. In Section 3.4 this work is summarized. In comparison
Recommended publications
  • Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee October 29, 2014 Full
    MEETING OF THE REGIONAL TRANSIT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. SCAG Los Angeles Main Office 818 W. 7th Street, 12th Floor, Policy Committee Room A Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 236-1800 Teleconferencing Available: Please RSVP with Ed Rodriguez at [email protected] 24 hours in advance. Videoconferencing Available: Orange SCAG Office Ventura SCAG Office 600 S. Main St, Ste. 906 Orange, CA 92863 950 County Square Dr, Ste 101 Ventura, CA 93003 Imperial SCAG Office Riverside SCAG Office 1405 North Imperial Ave., Suite 1 , CA 92243 3403 10th Street, Suite 805 Riverside, CA 92501 SCAG San Bernardino Office 1170 W. 3rd St, Ste. 140 San Bernardino, CA 92410 If members of the public wish to review the attachments or have any questions on any of the agenda items, please contact Matt Gleason at (213) 236-1832 or [email protected]. REGIONALTRANSIT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA October 29, 2014 The Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee may consider and act upon any TIME PG# of the items listed on the agenda regardless of whether they are listed as information or action items. 1.0 CALL TO ORDER (Wayne Wassell, Metro, Regional Transit TAC Chair) 2.0 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD - Members of the public desiring to speak on items on the agenda, or items not on the agenda, but within the purview of the Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee, must fill out and present a speaker’s card to the assistant prior to speaking. Comments will be limited to three minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Session Virtual Meeting Held Via Webex December 8, 2020 6:15 Pm
    WORK SESSION VIRTUAL MEETING HELD VIA WEBEX DECEMBER 8, 2020 6:15 PM Call to order 1. Metropolitan Transit Project Manager Shahin Khazrajafari will be presenting an overview of the forthcoming Metro Transit D Line Bus Rapid Transit project, the anticipated construction timeline, and will be available to answer any questions. Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738. AGENDA SECTION: Work Session Items AGENDA ITEM # 1. WORK SESSION STAFF REPORT NO. 31 WORK SESSION 12/8/2020 REPORT PREPARED BY: Joe Powers, Assistant City Engineer DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR REVIEW: Kristin Asher, Public Works Director/City Engineer 12/2/2020 OTHER DEPARTMENT REVIEW: N/A CITY MANAGER REVIEW: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager 12/2/2020 ITEM FOR WORK SESSION: Metropolitan Transit Project Manager Shahin Khazrajafari will be presenting an overview of the forthcoming Metro Transit D Line Bus Rapid Transit project, the anticipated construction timeline, and will be available to answer any questions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Metro Transit is moving towards construction of planned improvements to the Route 5 corridor with the D Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project after securing final project funding at the legislature in the recent bonding bill. The project will be a positive asset to the City of Richfield and enhance the overall metro transit system in our region. The D Line will substantially replace Route 5, running primarily on Portland Avenue within Richfield and on Chicago, Emerson and Fremont Avenues in Minneapolis. Rapid bus brings better amenities, such as: Faster, more frequent service; Pre-boarding fare payment for faster stops; Neighborhood-scale stations with amenities; Enhanced security; and, Larger & specialized vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Rush Line Bus Rapid Transit Station Area Planning Overview: White Bear Lake May 2020
    RUSH LINE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STATION AREA PLANNING OVERVIEW: WHITE BEAR LAKE MAY 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1. What is Station Area Planning? ................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Preliminary Station Area Planning ............................................................................................. 2 1.3. Available Implementation Resources......................................................................................... 8 1.4. Advanced Station Area Planning ............................................................................................. 10 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Rush Line BRT Project Advisory Committees ....................................................................... 2 Figure 2: White Bear Lake Area Rush Line BRT Stations .................................................................... 4 Figure 3: White Bear Lake Demographic Characteristics ..................................................................... 5 Figure 4: White Bear Lake Employment Characteristics ...................................................................... 6 Figure 5: Six-Step Framework for Health Impact Assessments ........................................................... 7 i The Rush Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project is a 15-mile proposed transit route with stops between Union Depot in Lowertown Saint Paul and downtown White Bear Lake. The project is currently in the environmental analysis phase, during which the project’s design is advanced while
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax County Transit Network
    Fairfax Connector Service Metrobus Service Metrorail Service Map Symbols Weekday, Saturday, and/or Sunday Service Rush Hour Only Service Limited-Stop and Express Service Metro MWY Metroway REX Orange Line Yellow Line Government Metrorail Station Middle School fairfaxconnector.com 630 301 432 557 641 924 Building FAIRFAX CONNECTOR Seasonal For Metrobus information visit wmata.com Blue Line Silver Line 340 558 640 981 305 461 622 642 926 396 or call 202-637-7000, TTY 202-962-2033 For Metrorail information visit wmata.com Transit Station Hospital High School 703-339-7200 TTY 703-339-1608 306 350 559 650 335 462 623 644 927 697 or call 202-637-7000, TTY 202-962-2033 City of Fairfax CUE Service BusTracker Park & Ride Police Station College/University 371 341 552 624 651 929 Service during most weekday hours. May also Virginia Railway Express (VRE) Service REAL-TIME SERVICE INFORMATION operate on Saturday and/or Sunday. GOLD GREEN @ffxconnector fairfaxconnector 467 351 553 631 652 980 Service during select weekday hours. Manassas Line Fredericksburg Line VRE Station Library Recreation Center 306 BEAC (Off-Peak or Rush Hour). May also operate For City of Fairfax CUE information visit H MILL 372 554 632 722 RD Fairfax County Department of Transportation (FCDOT) ensures nondiscrimination in all programs and activities in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of on Saturday and/or Sunday. cuebus.org or call 703-385-7859, TTY 711 For VRE information visit vre.org or call (800) RIDE-VRE (743-3873) Limited-Stop or Express Service. Most operate Connector Store Airport 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
    [Show full text]
  • East-West Corridor High Capacity Transit Plan Rapid Transit Evaluation Results
    East-West Corridor High Capacity Transit Plan Rapid Transit Evaluation Results About the Corridor The AECOM consultant team conducted a high-level analysis of commuter rail, light rail transit (LRT), streetcar and bus rapid transit (BRT) to determine the most appropriate mode for the East- West Corridor. Based on the corridor fit, ridership capacity, cost per mile to build/operate and available right-of-way, BRT will move forward for more detailed analysis. This fact sheet provides, in more detail, how BRT and LRT compared and why BRT was determined to be the best fit. BRT with LRT Screening Results Below are the similarities and differences between bus rapid transit (BRT) and light rail transit (LRT). Features Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Light Rail Transit (LRT) Service Frequency Frequent service during peak hrs. (5–15 min.) Frequent service during peak hrs. (5–15 min.) Typical Corridor Length 5–25 mi. 10–20 mi. Range of Operating Speed 25–55 MPH 30–55 MPH Right-of-Way Dedicated lanes and/or mixed traffic Dedicated lanes with overhead electrical systems Typical Station Spacing ½ and one mile apart One mile apart, outside of downtowns Level boarding at high-quality stations Level boarding at high-quality stations Vehicle Types 40- or 60-ft. buses that have multiple doors 1–3 car trains; low floor vehicles Technology Traffic signal priority Traffic signal priority Real-time passenger info Real-time passenger info Off-board fare payment Off-board fare payment Typical Operating Cost per Hr. $100–$200 $200–$400 Typical Capital Cost per Mi. $2.5 million–$20 million $140 million+ Ridership Capacity by Mode Best Poor Current East-West Corridor Ridership (6.9k–8.7k riders) Modern Streetcar Light Rail Transit (1.5k–6k riders) (20k–90k riders) Bus Rapid Transit (4k–15k riders) Commuter Rail (3k–20k riders) Ridership Mode Capacity by 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 The chart above demonstrates that BRT and commuter rail both have the needed capacity to meet ridership needs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Transportation System Performance Evaluation
    2020 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The Council’s mission is to foster efficient and economic growth for a prosperous metropolitan region Metropolitan Council Members Charlie Zelle Chair Raymond Zeran District 9 Judy Johnson District 1 Peter Lindstrom District 10 Reva Chamblis District 2 Susan Vento District 11 Christopher Ferguson District 3 Francisco J. Gonzalez District 12 Deb Barber District 4 Chai Lee District 13 Molly Cummings District 5 Kris Fredson District 14 Lynnea Atlas-Ingebretson District 6 Phillip Sterner District 15 Robert Lilligren District 7 Wendy Wulff District 16 Abdirahman Muse District 8 The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning organization for the seven-county Twin Cities area. The Council operates the regional bus and rail system, collects and treats wastewater, coordinates regional water resources, plans and helps fund regional parks, and administers federal funds that provide housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income individuals and families. The 17-member Council board is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the governor. On request, this publication will be made available in alternative formats to people with disabilities. Call Metropolitan Council information at 651-602-1140 or TTY 651-291-0904. Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................ES-1 2040 Transportation Policy Plan: Updated Regional Transportation ........................................ ES-1 Scope of this Report ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Support Material Agenda Item No
    Support Material Agenda Item No. 17 Board of Directors Meeting November 4, 2020 10:00 AM MEETING ACCESSIBLE VIA ZOOM AT: https://gosbcta.zoom.us/j/99354182777 Teleconference Dial: 1-669-900-6833 Meeting ID: 993 5418 2777 CONSENT CALENDAR Transit 17. Task 3: Innovative Transit Review of the Metro-Valley Receive and file Task 3: Innovative Transit Review of the Metro-Valley Report. Task 3: Innovative Transit Review Report is being provided as a separate attachment. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY CONSOLIDATION STUDY AND INNOVATIVE TRANSIT REVIEW TASK 3—INNOVATIVE TRANSIT ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS OCTOBER 1, 2020 This page intentionally left blank. CONSOLIDATION STUDY AND INNOVATIVE TRANSIT REVIEW TASK 3—INNOVATIVE TRANSIT ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SUBMITTAL (VERSION 2.0) PROJECT NO.: 12771C70, TASK NO. 3 202012771C70, TASK NO. 3 2020 DATE: OCTOBER 1, 2020 WSP SUITE 350 862 E. HOSPITALITY LANE SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92408 TEL.: +1 909 888-1106 FAX: +1 909 889-1884 WSP.COM This page intentionally left blank. October 1, 2020 Beatriz Valdez, Director of Special Projects and Strategic Initiatives San Bernardino County Transportation Authority 1170 W. Third Street, 1st Floor San Bernardino, CA 92410 Dear Ms.Valdez: Client ref.: Contract No. C14086, CTO No. 70 Contract No. C14086, CTO No. 70 WSP is pleased to submit this Draft Task 3 Innovative Service Analysis and Concepts Report as part of the Consolidation Study and Innovative Transit Review. Upon receipt of comments from SBCTA and your partners, we will prepare and submit a final version of this report. Yours sincerely, Cliff Henke AVP/Project Leader, Global ZEB/BRT Coordinator XX/xx Encl.
    [Show full text]
  • Ride Into Summer with Metrolink
    5 6 JUNE | JULY 2014 GO SMART WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO FARE CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS UNDERWAY ADJUSTMENT NEW Go511 APP EFFECTIVE Go511 offers commuters Construction began earlier this year on two major projects — the rail, bus rapid transit, along with local and regional bus services. The Transit JULY 1! and riders a smarter way to Downtown San Bernardino Passenger Rail Project and the San Bernardino Center will provide enhanced benefits to current transit users and make travel. You’ll get up-to-the- Transit Center – that will make commuting to and from the Inland Empire these travel modes more attractive to future riders in the region. With 13 easier. Instead of ending at the historic Santa Fe Depot, the Downtown San local Omnitrans bus routes, the new sbX Bus Rapid Transit service, Victor IMPORTANT NEWS FOR YOUR COMMUTE minute traffic updates plus RIDE INTO SUMMER real-time and scheduled Bernardino Passenger Rail Project will extend Metrolink’s track one mile Valley Transit Authority, Mountain Area Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) bus In April 2004, the Metrolink Board of Directors approved a 10-year transit information for five east and connect with the future San Bernardino Transit Center. As a result service, and Metrolink trains all connecting at this central hub, connectivity fare restructuring program beginning July 1, 2005, which changed the counties in Southern Cali- of the construction activity, Metrolink will be implementing modifications to within the Inland Empire will be more efficient than ever. Metrolink fare structure from a zone-based system to a driving fornia: Los Angeles, Orange, schedules and train set sizes to accommodate the projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Transit Capacity
    7UDQVLW&DSDFLW\DQG4XDOLW\RI6HUYLFH0DQXDO PART 3 RAIL TRANSIT CAPACITY CONTENTS 1. RAIL CAPACITY BASICS ..................................................................................... 3-1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 3-1 Grouping ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 The Basics................................................................................................................... 3-2 Design versus Achievable Capacity ............................................................................ 3-3 Service Headway..................................................................................................... 3-4 Line Capacity .......................................................................................................... 3-5 Train Control Throughput....................................................................................... 3-5 Commuter Rail Throughput .................................................................................... 3-6 Station Dwells ......................................................................................................... 3-6 Train/Car Capacity...................................................................................................... 3-7 Introduction............................................................................................................. 3-7 Car Capacity...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Major Changes at the San Bernardino Station
    5 6 DECEMBER 2016 | JANUARY 2017 DESTINATIONS CALENDAR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EVENTS AND DESTINATIONS TO REACH VIA METROLINK A YEAR IN REVIEW: METROLINK MILESTONES & HIGHLIGHTS 2016 & EVENTS For more events and destinations, go to: metrolinktrains.com/destinationsandevents Metrolink will operate normal Saturday service on METROLINK RIDERS SAVE $10 OFF Saturday, Dec. 24 and normal Sunday Service on SELECT DISNEY ON ICE SHOWS HOLIDAY EVENTS EDITION Sunday, Dec. 25. On Monday, Dec. 26, Metrolink Rev up for non-stop fun with will operate special Sunday service on the San four favorite Disney stories at Bernardino and Antelope Valley Lines only. No other lines will operate. Disney On Ice presents Worlds ® of Enchantment! See the To allow riders to attend the 2017 Tournament of Roses Parade in Pasadena Disney•Pixar Cars race across MAJOR CHANGES AT THE JANUARY MARCH MAY JUNE on Monday, Jan. 2, the first train on Metrolink’s San Bernardino Line will the ice; dive into fun with The $3 STATION-TO-STATION FARES METROLINK MOBILE FIRST OF 40 NEW TIER 4 91/PV LINE OPENS FOR SERVICE depart San Bernardino at 6:10 a.m. making all station stops and arriving at Little Mermaid; join the adven- To encourage local travel, Metrolink lowers TICKETING APP LAUNCHED LOCOMOTIVES ARRIVE Metrolink was ready to roll with 24 miles L.A. Union Station at 7:45 a.m. On the Antelope Valley Line, the first train will short distance fares system-wide to as low of new passenger rail line and four new tures of Buzz, Woody and the SAN BERNARDINO STATION Riders on the go can now purchase Metrolink has been upgrading its fleet of depart Lancaster at 5:40 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Rebuilding America – Infrastructure Recovery Plan
    Metro Rebuilding America – Infrastructure Recovery Plan Working together, the 116th Congress, the Trump Key elements of the Rebuilding America initiative: Administration, and infrastructure agencies like 1. Robust federal funding Metro have an opportunity to stimulate America’s 2. Long-term federal commitment economy by adopting an Infrastructure Recovery to infrastructure Plan. Such a plan can help rebuild America, 3. Smart federal tax incentives while smartly and efficiently creating hundreds 4. Bold grant program for major of thousands of public and private sector infrastructure projects construction, manufacturing and service jobs, 5. Strong backing for workforce that will stand up our national economy in the development programs post COVID-19 pandemic era. We project that a Rebuilding America initiative In LA County, Metro is advancing its plan to – which enjoys broad parallels with the Moving rebuild America – powered by Measure M – that Forward Framework issued by the Chairman of is in the process of creating over 450,000 jobs the House Transportation and Infrastructure and producing an economic output in excess of Committee Congressman Peter DeFazio on $79 billion. These statistics from the independent January 29, 2020 – will serve to jump-start and well-respected Los Angeles County Economic America’s infrastructure. We are especially Development Corporation, shows that there is a supportive of the Buy America Reforms in the smart and sustainable path forward to boldly have Moving Forward Framework, which will ensure the private sector and government agencies like that American taxpayer dollars are used on Metro take the lead in Rebuilding America. products that will be proudly made in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in the METRO System
    Overview of Bus Rapid Transit House Transportation Finance Committee February 25, 2021 Charles Carlson, Director of BRT Projects, Metro Transit The METRO Network • Frequent service • Enhanced stations • Ticket machines • Shelters with heat and light • Security features • Specialized vehicles, all-door boarding 2 Types of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in the METRO System Arterial BRT Highway BRT Guideway BRT A Line, C Line Orange Line & Red Line Gold Line & Rush Line BRT Station infrastructure FTA Small Starts FTA New Starts Primarily in mixed traffic + Primarily HOV/HOT lanes +Exclusive BRT guideway All BRT lines have more similarities than differences! 3 A Line and C Line: Early BRT Success • Opened 2016 (A Line) and 2019 (C Line); >30% Ridership growth/corridor • Over 3 million BRT rides 2019, 2.4 million 2020 4 Upcoming Bus Rapid Transit Lines Planned Service Launch 2021-2030 METRO Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Downtown Minneapolis to Burnsville • 12 stations, 17 miles • All-day, frequent BRT along I-35W • Improved access to 56,000 jobs and 81,000 residents outside of downtown Minneapolis Project Status • Fully funded, $150 million project • $15 million State funding (2014, 2017) • Aligned with major highway projects on I-35W • Opening late 2021 6 I-35W & Lake Street Station- Freeway Level Future BRT Station Present Construction Past Bus Stop 7 Orange Line: Knox Avenue Tunnel under I-494 Penn-American • Transit and bike/ped-only tunnel under 494 District I-494 • Doorstep access to Best Buy and Penn- American district shopping, jobs,
    [Show full text]