S1 Table. Anatomical Regions of Individual SPES Contacts in Correspondence to Fig 8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

S1 Table. Anatomical regions of individual SPES contacts in correspondence to Fig 8. Subject Contact Number Anatomical Region 1 Superior frontal gyrus 2 Central sulcus 3 Lateral occipito-temporal gyrus (fusiform gyrus) #1 4 Superior frontal gyrus 5 Inferior frontal sulcus 6 Middle occipital gyrus 1 Subparietal sulcus 2 Posterior-dorsal part of the cingulate gyrus #2 3 Precuneus 4 Middle-anterior part of the cingulate gyrus and sulcus 5 Sulcus intermedius primus (of Jensen) 1 Inferior part of the precentral sulcus 2 Subcentral gyrus and sulci 3 Inferior part of the precentral sulcus #3 4 Middle-anterior part of the cingulate gyrus and sulcus 5 Middle-anterior part of the cingulate gyrus and sulcus 6 Hippocampus 7 Hippocampus 1 Transverse temporal sulcus 2 Posterior ramus of the lateral sulcus 3 Intraparietal sulcus and transverse parietal sulci 4 Intraparietal sulcus and transverse parietal sulci #4 5 Hippocampus 6 Superior occipital sulcus and transverse occipital sulcus 7 Middle-posterior part of the cingulate gyrus and sulcus 8 Posterior ramus of the lateral sulcus 1 Superior frontal gyrus 2 Superior frontal sulcus #5 3 Middle frontal gyrus 4 Parahippocampal part of the medial occipito-temporal gyrus 5 Middle-anterior part of the cingulate gyrus and sulcus 1 Superior frontal sulcus 2 Posterior-dorsal part of the cingulate gyrus #6 3 Superior frontal gyrus 4 Middle frontal gyrus 1 Inferior frontal sulcus #7 2 Opercular part of the inferior frontal gyrus #8 1 Middle-anterior part of the cingulate gyrus and sulcus 1 Superior frontal sulcus 2 Orbital sulci (H-shaped) #9 3 Superior segment of the circular sulcus of the insula 4 Middle-anterior part of the cingulate gyrus and sulcus .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans Ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai
Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai To cite this version: Hans ten Donkelaar, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Jürgen Mai. Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, Frontiers, 2018, 12, pp.93. 10.3389/fnana.2018.00093. hal-01929541 HAL Id: hal-01929541 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01929541 Submitted on 21 Nov 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. REVIEW published: 19 November 2018 doi: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00093 Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans J. ten Donkelaar 1*†, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer 2† and Jürgen K. Mai 3† 1 Department of Neurology, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2 IMN Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives UMR 5293, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 3 Institute for Anatomy, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany The gyri and sulci of the human brain were deﬁned by pioneers such as Louis-Pierre Gratiolet and Alexander Ecker, and extensiﬁed by, among others, Dejerine (1895) and von Economo and Koskinas (1925).
[Show full text]
Insular Volume Reductions in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder
Insular volume reductions in patients with major depressive disorder Item Type Article Authors Mutschler, Isabella; Hänggi, Jürgen; Frei, Manuela; Lieb, Roselind; grosse Holforth, Martin; Seifritz, Erich; Spinelli, Simona Citation Mutschler, I., Hänggi, J., Frei, M., Lieb, R., grosse Holforth, M., Seifritz, E., & Spinelli, S. (2019). Insular volume reductions in patients with major depressive disorder. Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research, 33, 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.npbr.2019.06.002 Eprint version Post-print DOI 10.1016/j.npbr.2019.06.002 Publisher Elsevier BV Journal Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research Rights NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research, [[Volume], [Issue], (2019-06-22)] DOI: 10.1016/ j.npbr.2019.06.002 . © 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Download date 23/09/2021 13:26:26 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10754/656271 Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research 33 (2019) 39–47 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Neurology,
[Show full text]
01 05 Lateral Surface of the Brain-NOTES.Pdf
Lateral Surface of the Brain Medical Neuroscience | Tutorial Notes Lateral Surface of the Brain 1 MAP TO NEUROSCIENCE CORE CONCEPTS NCC1. The brain is the body's most complex organ. LEARNING OBJECTIVES After study of the assigned learning materials, the student will: 1. Demonstrate the four paired lobes of the cerebral cortex and describe the boundaries of each. 2. Sketch the major features of each cerebral lobe, as seen from the lateral view, identifying major gyri and sulci that characterize each lobe. NARRATIVE by Leonard E. WHITE and Nell B. CANT Duke Institute for Brain Sciences Department of Neurobiology Duke University School of Medicine Overview When you view the lateral aspect of a human brain specimen (see Figures A3A and A102), three structures are usually visible: the cerebral hemispheres, the cerebellum, and part of the brainstem (although the brainstem is not visible in the specimen photographed in lateral view for Fig. 1 below). The spinal cord has usually been severed (but we’ll consider the spinal cord later), and the rest of the subdivisions are hidden from lateral view by the hemispheres. The diencephalon and the rest of the brainstem are visible on the medial surface of a brain that has been cut in the midsagittal plane. Parts of all of the subdivisions are also visible from the ventral surface of the whole brain. Over the next several tutorials, you will find video demonstrations (from the brain anatomy lab) and photographs (in the tutorial notes) of these brain surfaces, and sufficient detail in the narrative to appreciate the overall organization of the parts of the brain that are visible from each perspective.
[Show full text]
Cortical Abnormalities in Bipolar Disorder: an MRI Analysis of 6503 Individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group
OPEN Molecular Psychiatry (2018) 23, 932–942 www.nature.com/mp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder: an MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group DP Hibar1,2, LT Westlye3,4,5, NT Doan3,4, N Jahanshad1, JW Cheung1, CRK Ching1,6, A Versace7, AC Bilderbeck8, A Uhlmann9,10, B Mwangi11, B Krämer12, B Overs13, CB Hartberg3, C Abé14, D Dima15,16, D Grotegerd17, E Sprooten18, E Bøen19, E Jimenez20, FM Howells9, G Delvecchio21, H Temmingh9, J Starke9, JRC Almeida22, JM Goikolea20, J Houenou23,24, LM Beard25, L Rauer12, L Abramovic26, M Bonnin20, MF Ponteduro16, M Keil27, MM Rive28,NYao29,30, N Yalin31, P Najt32, PG Rosa33,34, R Redlich17, S Trost27, S Hagenaars35, SC Fears36,37, S Alonso-Lana38,39, TGM van Erp40, T Nickson35, TM Chaim-Avancini33,34, TB Meier41,42, T Elvsåshagen3,43, UK Haukvik3,44, WH Lee18, AH Schene45,46, AJ Lloyd47, AH Young31, A Nugent48, AM Dale49,50, A Pfennig51, AM McIntosh35, B Lafer33, BT Baune52, CJ Ekman14, CA Zarate48, CE Bearden53,54, C Henry23,55, C Simhandl56, C McDonald32, C Bourne8,57, DJ Stein9,10, DH Wolf25, DM Cannon32, DC Glahn29,30, DJ Veltman58, E Pomarol-Clotet38,39, E Vieta20, EJ Canales-Rodriguez38,39, FG Nery33,59, FLS Duran33,34, GF Busatto33,34, G Roberts60, GD Pearlson29,30, GM Goodwin8, H Kugel61, HC Whalley35, HG Ruhe8,28,62, JC Soares11, JM Fullerton13,63, JK Rybakowski64, J Savitz42,65, KT Chaim66,67, M Fatjó-Vilas38,39, MG Soeiro-de-Souza33, MP Boks26, MV Zanetti33,34, MCG Otaduy66,67, MS Schaufelberger33,34, M Alda68, M Ingvar14,69,
[Show full text]
Neural Correlates Underlying Change in State Self-Esteem Hiroaki Kawamichi 1,2,3, Sho K
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Neural correlates underlying change in state self-esteem Hiroaki Kawamichi 1,2,3, Sho K. Sugawara2,4,5, Yuki H. Hamano2,5,6, Ryo Kitada 2,7, Eri Nakagawa2, Takanori Kochiyama8 & Norihiro Sadato 2,5 Received: 21 July 2017 State self-esteem, the momentary feeling of self-worth, functions as a sociometer involved in Accepted: 11 January 2018 maintenance of interpersonal relations. How others’ appraisal is subjectively interpreted to change Published: xx xx xxxx state self-esteem is unknown, and the neural underpinnings of this process remain to be elucidated. We hypothesized that changes in state self-esteem are represented by the mentalizing network, which is modulated by interactions with regions involved in the subjective interpretation of others’ appraisal. To test this hypothesis, we conducted task-based and resting-state fMRI. Participants were repeatedly presented with their reputations, and then rated their pleasantness and reported their state self- esteem. To evaluate the individual sensitivity of the change in state self-esteem based on pleasantness (i.e., the subjective interpretation of reputation), we calculated evaluation sensitivity as the rate of change in state self-esteem per unit pleasantness. Evaluation sensitivity varied across participants, and was positively correlated with precuneus activity evoked by reputation rating. Resting-state fMRI revealed that evaluation sensitivity was positively correlated with functional connectivity of the precuneus with areas activated by negative reputation, but negatively correlated with areas activated by positive reputation. Thus, the precuneus, as the part of the mentalizing system, serves as a gateway for translating the subjective interpretation of reputation into state self-esteem.
[Show full text]
PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/200480 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-05 and may be subject to change. REVIEW published: 19 November 2018 doi: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00093 Toward a Common Terminology for the Gyri and Sulci of the Human Cerebral Cortex Hans J. ten Donkelaar 1*†, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer 2† and Jürgen K. Mai 3† 1 Department of Neurology, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2 IMN Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives UMR 5293, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 3 Institute for Anatomy, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany The gyri and sulci of the human brain were deﬁned by pioneers such as Louis-Pierre Gratiolet and Alexander Ecker, and extensiﬁed by, among others, Dejerine (1895) and von Economo and Koskinas (1925). Extensive discussions of the cerebral sulci and their variations were presented by Ono et al. (1990), Duvernoy (1992), Tamraz and Comair (2000), and Rhoton (2007). An anatomical parcellation of the spatially normalized single high resolution T1 volume provided by the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI; Collins, 1994; Collins et al., 1998) was used for the macroscopical labeling of functional studies (Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002; Rolls et al., 2015). In the standard atlas of the human brain by Mai et al. (2016), the terminology from Mai and Paxinos (2012) is used. It contains an extensively analyzed individual brain hemisphere in the MNI- space.
[Show full text]
1. Lateral View of Lobes in Left Hemisphere TOPOGRAPHY
TOPOGRAPHY T1 Division of Cerebral Cortex into Lobes 1. Lateral View of Lobes in Left Hemisphere 2. Medial View of Lobes in Right Hemisphere PARIETAL PARIETAL LIMBIC FRONTAL FRONTAL INSULAR: buried OCCIPITAL OCCIPITAL in lateral fissure TEMPORAL TEMPORAL 3. Dorsal View of Lobes 4. Ventral View of Lobes PARIETAL TEMPORAL LIMBIC FRONTAL OCCIPITAL FRONTAL OCCIPITAL Comment: The cerebral lobes are arbitrary divisions of the cerebrum, taking their names, for the most part, from overlying bones. They are not functional subdivisions of the brain, but serve as a reference for locating specific functions within them. The anterior (rostral) end of the frontal lobe is referred to as the frontal pole. Similarly, the anterior end of the temporal lobe is the temporal pole, and the posterior end of the occipital lobe the occipital pole. TOPOGRAPHY T2 central sulcus central sulcus parietal frontal occipital lateral temporal lateral sulcus sulcus SUMMARY CARTOON: LOBES SUMMARY CARTOON: GYRI Lateral View of Left Hemisphere central sulcus postcentral superior parietal superior precentral gyrus gyrus lobule frontal intraparietal sulcus gyrus inferior parietal lobule: supramarginal and angular gyri middle frontal parieto-occipital sulcus gyrus incision for close-up below OP T preoccipital O notch inferior frontal cerebellum gyrus: O-orbital lateral T-triangular sulcus superior, middle and inferior temporal gyri OP-opercular Lateral View of Insula central sulcus cut surface corresponding to incision in above figure insula superior temporal gyrus Comment: Insula (insular gyri) exposed by removal of overlying opercula (“lids” of frontal and parietal cortex). TOPOGRAPHY T3 Language sites and arcuate fasciculus. MRI reconstruction from a volunteer. central sulcus supramarginal site (posterior Wernicke’s) Language sites (squares) approximated from electrical stimulation sites in patients undergoing operations for epilepsy or tumor removal (Ojeman and Berger).
[Show full text]
Supplementary Tables
Supplementary Tables: ROI Atlas Significant table grey matter Test ROI # Brainetome area beta volume EG pre vs post IT 8 'superior frontal gyrus, part 4 (dorsolateral area 6), right', 0.773 17388 11 'superior frontal gyrus, part 6 (medial area 9), left', 0.793 18630 12 'superior frontal gyrus, part 6 (medial area 9), right', 0.806 24543 17 'middle frontal gyrus, part 2 (inferior frontal junction), left', 0.819 22140 35 'inferior frontal gyrus, part 4 (rostral area 45), left', 1.3 10665 67 'paracentral lobule, part 2 (area 4 lower limb), left', 0.86 13662 EG pre vs post ET 20 'middle frontal gyrus, part 3 (area 46), right', 0.934 28188 21 'middle frontal gyrus, part 4 (ventral area 9/46 ), left' 0.812 27864 31 'inferior frontal gyrus, part 2 (inferior frontal sulcus), left', 0.864 11124 35 'inferior frontal gyrus, part 4 (rostral area 45), left', 1 10665 50 'orbital gyrus, part 5 (area 13), right', -1.7 22626 67 'paracentral lobule, part 2 (area 4 lower limb), left', 1.1 13662 180 'cingulate gyrus, part 3 (pregenual area 32), right', 0.9 10665 261 'Cerebellar lobule VIIb, vermis', -1.5 729 IG pre vs post IT 16 middle frontal gyrus, part 1 (dorsal area 9/46), right', -0.8 27567 24 'middle frontal gyrus, part 5 (ventrolateral area 8), right', -0.8 22437 40 'inferior frontal gyrus, part 6 (ventral area 44), right', -0.9 8262 54 'precentral gyrus, part 1 (area 4 head and face), right', -0.9 14175 64 'precentral gyrus, part 2 (caudal dorsolateral area 6), left', -1.3 18819 81 'middle temporal gyrus, part 1 (caudal area 21), left', -1.4 14472
[Show full text]
Altered Resting State Connectivity of the Insular Cortex in Individuals with Fibromyalgia
The Journal of Pain, Vol 15, No 8 (August), 2014: pp 815-826 Available online at www.jpain.org and www.sciencedirect.com Original Reports Altered Resting State Connectivity of the Insular Cortex in Individuals With Fibromyalgia Eric Ichesco,* Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke,*,** Rupal Bhavsar,*,y Daniel J. Clauw,* Scott J. Peltier,z Jieun Kim,x Vitaly Napadow,x,{,k Johnson P. Hampson,* Anson E. Kairys,*,yy David A. Williams,* and Richard E. Harris* *Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. yNeurology Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. z Functional MRI Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. xMGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts. {Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. kDepartment of Radiology, Logan College of Chiropractic, Chesterfield, Missouri. **Department of Neurology, Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. yyDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado. Abstract: The insular cortex (IC) and cingulate cortex (CC) are critically involved in pain perception. Previously we demonstrated that fibromyalgia (FM) patients have greater connectivity between the insula and default mode network at rest, and that changes in the degree of this connectivity were associated with changes in the intensity of ongoing clinical pain. In this study we more thoroughly evaluated the degree of resting-state connectivity to multiple regions of the IC in individuals with FM and healthy controls. We also investigated the relationship between connectivity, experimental pain, and current clinical chronic pain. Functional connectivity was assessed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in 18 FM patients and 18 age- and sex-matched healthy controls using predefined seed regions in the anterior, middle, and posterior IC.
[Show full text]
Fig. S1: Behavioral Results for the High (HP) and Low Probability (LP) Condition
Fig. S1: Behavioral results for the high (HP) and low probability (LP) condition. A) Average number of reversal errors per reversal. B) Total number of switches between the two response alternatives during the experiment. * p<0.05. Fig. S2: Computational parameters for the two conditions. Both the learning rate (A) and the average decision certainty (C) were higher in the HP as compared to the LP condition. Inverse temperature (B) did not differ between conditions. * p<0.05 high probability (HP) vs. low probability (LP) condition. Fig. S3: Signal change in response to negative feedback (ALLNEG – ALLPOS) superimposed on the MNI template brain. In both conditions (HP: top row, LP: bottom row), there was increased activity in the RCZ (left) and in the lateral prefrontal cortex (right). The color bar indicates z-scores. Tab. S1: Brain regions and MNI coordinates (x,y,z) of brain regions significantly activated in negative feedback trials that were followed by a behavioral adaptation after task rule reversal (FINREVERR – ALLPOS). Only clusters of at least 5 contiguous voxels are reported. L, left; R, right; BA, Brodmann area; RCZ, rostral cingulate zone. MNI coordinates Brain region z-score mm3 x y z HP condition L/R RCZ 4.79 7216 1 33 29 L inferior parietal lobule 4.58 7533 -52 -37 35 R inferior parietal lobule 4.6 8489 46 -51 35 R inferior/middle frontal gyrus 4.53 6346 34 18 28 L inferior frontal gyrus 4.1 318 -55 6 28 L pregenual BA 32 4.37 2080 -12 50 6 L middle frontal gyrus 4.49 1515 -41 42 27 R dorsal postcentral sulcus 4.46 1142 24 -40 59 L parieto-occipital transition cortex 4.09 146 -13 -70 33 L/R posterior cingulate cortex 4.1 1506 8 -17 30 paracentral lobule 3.57 323 -5 -39 63 LP condition L/R RCZ 4.48 3277 -2 36 28 R middle frontal gyrus 4.42 5057 46 38 26 L inferior frontal sulcus 4.16 613 -37 33 24 L/R ventral posterior cingulate cortex 4.38 770 -1 -24 27 L inferior frontal gyrus 3.93 371 -39 4 24 R inferior parietal lobule 4.02 362 43 -42 29 Tab.
[Show full text]
Seed MNI Coordinates Lobe
MNI Coordinates Seed Lobe (Hemisphere) Region BAa X Y Z FP1 -18 62 0 Frontal Lobe (L) Medial Frontal Gyrus 10 FPz 4 62 0 Frontal Lobe (R) Medial Frontal Gyrus 10 FP2 24 60 0 Frontal Lobe (R) Superior Frontal Gyrus 10 AF7 -38 50 0 Frontal Lobe (L) Middle Frontal Gyrus 10 AF3 -30 50 24 Frontal Lobe (L) Superior Frontal Gyrus 9 AFz 4 58 30 Frontal Lobe (R) Medial Frontal Gyrus 9 AF4 36 48 20 Frontal Lobe (R) Middle Frontal Gyrus 10 AF8 42 46 -4 Frontal Lobe (R) Inferior Frontal Gyrus 10 F7 -48 26 -4 Frontal Lobe (L) Inferior Frontal Gyrus 47 F5 -48 28 18 Frontal Lobe (L) Inferior Frontal Gyrus 45 F3 -38 28 38 Frontal Lobe (L) Precentral Gyrus 9 F1 -20 30 50 Frontal Lobe (L) Superior Frontal Gyrus 8 Fz 2 32 54 Frontal Lobe (L) Superior Frontal Gyrus 8 F2 26 32 48 Frontal Lobe (R) Superior Frontal Gyrus 8 F4 42 30 34 Frontal Lobe (R) Precentral Gyrus 9 F6 50 28 14 Frontal Lobe (R) Middle Frontal Gyrus 46 F8 48 24 -8 Frontal Lobe (R) Inferior Frontal Gyrus 47 FT9 -50 -6 -36 Temporal Lobe (L) Inferior Temporal Gyrus 20 FT7 -54 2 -8 Temporal Lobe (L) Superior Temporal Gyrus 22 FC5 -56 4 22 Frontal Lobe (L) Precentral Gyrus 6 FC3 -44 6 48 Frontal Lobe (L) Middle Frontal Gyrus 6 FC1 -22 6 64 Frontal Lobe (L) Middle Frontal Gyrus 6 FCz 4 6 66 Frontal Lobe (R) Medial Frontal Gyrus 6 FC2 28 8 60 Frontal Lobe (R) Sub-Gyral 6 FC4 48 8 42 Frontal Lobe (R) Middle Frontal Gyrus 6 FC6 58 6 16 Frontal Lobe (R) Inferior Frontal Gyrus 44 FT8 54 2 -12 Temporal Lobe (R) Superior Temporal Gyrus 38 FT10 50 -6 -38 Temporal Lobe (R) Inferior Temporal Gyrus 20 T7/T3
[Show full text]
Cortical Parcellation Protocol
CORTICAL PARCELLATION PROTOCOL APRIL 5, 2010 © 2010 NEUROMORPHOMETRICS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINCIPAL AUTHORS: Jason Tourville, Ph.D. Research Assistant Professor Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems Boston University Ruth Carper, Ph.D. Assistant Research Scientist Center for Human Development University of California, San Diego Georges Salamon, M.D. Research Dept., Radiology David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MANY OTHERS Neuromorphometrics, Inc. 22 Westminster Street Somerville MA, 02144-1630 Phone/Fax (617) 776-7844 neuromorphometrics.com OVERVIEW The cerebral cortex is divided into 49 macro-anatomically defined regions in each hemisphere that are of broad interest to the neuroimaging community. Region of interest (ROI) boundary definitions were derived from a number of cortical labeling methods currently in use. Protocols from the Laboratory of Neuroimaging at UCLA (LONI; Shattuck et al., 2008), the University of Iowa Mental Health Clinical Research Center (IOWA; Crespo-Facorro et al., 2000; Kim et al., 2000), the Center for Morphometric Analysis at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH-CMA; Caviness et al., 1996), a collaboration between the Freesurfer group at MGH and Boston University School of Medicine (MGH-Desikan; Desikan et al., 2006), and UC San Diego (Carper & Courchesne, 2000; Carper & Courchesne, 2005; Carper et al., 2002) are specifically referenced in the protocol below. Methods developed at Boston University (Tourville & Guenther, 2003), Brigham and Women’s Hospital (McCarley & Shenton, 2008), Stanford (Allan Reiss lab), the University of Maryland (Buchanan et al., 2004), and the University of Toyoma (Zhou et al., 2007) were also consulted. The development of the protocol was also guided by the Ono, Kubik, and Abernathy (1990), Duvernoy (1999), and Mai, Paxinos, and Voss (Mai et al., 2008) neuroanatomical atlases.
[Show full text]