DOCSLIB.ORG

The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader Intellectual and Political Controversies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader Intellectual and Political Controversies The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader Intellectual and Political Controversies Edited by Sandra Harding '; c ROUTLEDGE NEW YORK AND LONDON Published in 2004 by Routledge CONTENTS 29 West 35th Street New York, New York 10001 Acknowledgments IX www.routledge-ny.com Permissions xi Published in Great Britain by Routledge 1. Introduction: Standpoint Theory as a Site of Political, 11 New Fetter Lane London EC4P 4EE Philosophic, and Scientific Debate www.routledge.co.uk SANDRA HARDING Copyright © 2004 by Routledge I. The Logic of a Standpoint 17 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group. 2. Women's Perspective as a Radical Critique of Sociology 21 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper. DOROTHY E. SMITH All rights reserved. No part of this book maybe reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any 3. The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism 35 including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. NANCY C. M. HARTSOCK 4. Feminist Politics and Epistemology: The Standpoint 10 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 of Women 55 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ALISON M. JAGGAR The feminist standpoint theory reader : intellectual and political 5. Hand, Brain, and Heart: A Feminist Epistemology controversies / edited by Sandra Harding. for the Natural Sciences 67 p. cm. HILARY ROSE Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-415-94500-3 (alk. paper)—ISBN 0-415-94501-1 (pbk.: alk. paper) 6. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism 1. Feminist theory. I. Harding, Sandra G. and the Privilege of Partial Perspective 81 HQ1190.F46313 2003 305 .42'01—dc21 DONNA HARAWAY 2003009900 7. Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought 103 PATRICIA HILL COLLINS xiv • Permissions Kathi Weeks, "Labor, Standpoints, and Feminist Subjects," excerpted from 1 Constituting Feminist Subjects. Copyright © 1998. Excerpted and reprinted by permission of author and Cornell University Press. Introduction: Standpoint Theory as a Site Alison Wylie, 'Why Standpoint Matters." Published by permission of author. of Political, Philosophic, and Scientific Debate SANDRA HARDING A Controversial Theory Standpoint theory has continued to attract both enthusiasts and critics during the three decades of its recent history. Moreover, tensions within and between its texts still generate lively debates in feminist circles, within which it first appeared a full generation ago. Some see this continuing controversiality as a problem to which they set out to provide a definitive solution. This theory can be saved from its controversiality, they hope. Others see such controversiality as a reason to avoid engaging with standpoint issues at all.1 Standpoint theory is valuable in many ways, as its defenders argue. I propose that this controversiality is another valuable resource that standpoint theory contributes to feminism as well as to contemporary scientific, philosophic, and political discussions more generally. Standpoint theory's innovations bring into focus fresh perspectives on some of the most difficult and anxiety-producing dilemmas of our era. Here I identify sources of these controversies. I do so through introducing some of standpoint theory's central themes, concepts, and projects as these have developed within feminist thinking.2 Standpoint Origins, Projects Standpoint theory emerged in the 1970s and 1980s as a feminist critical theory about relations between the production of knowledge and practices of power. It was intended to explain the surprising successes of emerging feminist re- search in a wide range of projects—"surprising" because feminism is a political movement and, according to the conventional view (one that is currently under siege from various quarters, however), politics can only obstruct and damage the production of scientific knowledge. Standpoint theory challenged this as- sumption. Consequently, it was proposed not just as an explanatory theory, but also prescriptively, as a method or theory of method (a methodology) to guide future feminist research. 2 • Sandra Harding Introduction • 3 Moreover, it expanded conventional horizons of the fields or disciplines standpoint projects and thus have been able to give this important aspect of the mentioned to include normative social theory. Distinctive conceptions of hu- Marxian legacy a viable future.4 Moreover, feminist theorists do so just as the man nature and the ideal society lay behind feminist research. Thus, standpoint last of the governments inspired by the Marxian legacy decline and disappear, theory was both explanatory and normative. Also controversial was the further and the promise of Marxian thought otherwise seems primarily an archaic relic claim that in this respect standpoint theory was no different from the standard of a bygone and failed Utopian moment. Of course some Marxists disagree with philosophies of science, epistemologies, and methodologies, which persistently the uses to which feminists have put standpoint theory. For others, however, that obscured their normative features behind a veil of claimed neutrality. Last but it should be feminists who succeed at such a project has been disquieting. Thus not least, standpoint theory was presented as a way of empowering oppressed feminist standpoint theory revives, improves, and disseminates an important groups, of valuing their experiences, and of pointing toward a way to develop an Marxian project and does so at an otherwise inauspicious moment for such an "oppositional consciousness," as Patricia Hill Collins (1989) and Chela Sandoval achievement. (chapter 14, this volume) put the point. Thus, it was presented by different au- During the same period standpoint themes—the "logic of a standpoint"— thors (and sometimes within a single essay) as a philosophy of both natural also appeared in the thinking of a wide array of other prodemocratic social and social sciences, an epistemology, a methodology (a prescriptive "method of movements, which did not overtly claim the Marxian legacy, standpoint termi- research," as several of its theorists phrased it), and a political strategy. Yet these nology, or, often, feminism. Race, ethnicity-based, anti-imperial, and Queer are fields and projects that conventionally are supposed to be kept separate. social justice movements routinely produce standpoint themes.5 This phe- So here are already a number of sources of its controversiality. It set out to nomenon suggests that standpoint theory is a kind of organic epistemology, explain how certain kinds of politics do not block the growth of knowledge methodology, philosophy of science, and social theory that can arise whenever but, rather, can stimulate and guide it. It presented itself as a philosophy of oppressed peoples gain public voice. "The social order looks different from the science, an epistemology, and a methodology or method of research, appear- perspective of our lives and our struggles," they say. Thus standpoint theory ing to conflate or even confuse fields standardly kept distinct. It framed these has both ah explicit and implicit history. It has a distinctive intellectual his- disciplinary projects within a feminist social theory and a political strategy, tory and also a popular or "folk" history visible in its apparently spontaneous though standardly it is presumed that these fields can and should be kept im- appeal to groups around the world seeking to understand themselves and the mune from social and political elements. It claimed mainstream, purportedly world around them in ways blocked by the conceptual frameworks dominant only descriptive and explanatory, theories about science and even within science in their culture.6 Philosophers and science theorists do not take kindly to being were alsb—perhaps always—normative, and that this was so even when they asked to think that such a "folk philosophy" or "folk science" has something to achieved maximally accurate description and explanation. teach them.7 In the modern West, though not in other cultures, philosophy and Additionally, implicitly it insisted that feminist concerns could not be re- science are virtually always positioned precisely against such "folk thought." stricted to what are usually regarded as only social and political issues, but These sources of contention are by no means the only features of standpoint instead must be focused on every aspect of natural and social orders, including theory that have made it a valuable site for thoughtful researchers, scholars, the very standards for what counts as knowledge, objectivity, rationality, and and students to reflect on and debate some of the most challenging scientific, good scientific method. Thus, feminist issues could not be pigeon-holed and political, and intellectual issues of our era. Significantly, in spite of continuing ignored as only women's issues, but instead had to be seen as valuably informing criticisms, it just doesn't go away. Moreover, as a methodology, practitioners theoretical, methodological, and political thought in general.3 seem to think that it works to explain kinds of accounts of nature and social Two further aspects of feminist standpoint theory's origins deserve mention relations not otherwise accessible—accounts that provide valuable resources here, for each has occasioned significant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Feminism and Foucault Debate: Stakes, Issues, Positions
    Chapter 1 THE FEMINISM AND FOUCAULT DEBATE: STAKES, ISSUES, POSITIONS eminists disagree about the usefulness of Foucault’s work for feminist theory and practice. Some feminists advocate a Foucauldian feminism, while others Fargue that the underlying assumptions of feminism are antithetical to Fou- cault’s theoretical framework.1 The question about whether or not Foucault’s work is useful for feminism is situated within the larger debate about the com- patibility of a postmodern approach with an emancipatory, progressive politics.2 Proponents of postmodernism see it as essential to a progressive politics. They claim that traditional notions of political unity, rights, and freedom carry norma- tive implications that foreclose certain questions about who is included in the po- litical process and that this foreclosure may result in systematic exclusion. Proponents of progressive politics, on the other hand, claim that postmodernism undermines the very possibility of a progressive, emancipatory politics mainly be- cause of its rejection of normative concepts.3 In an article entitled, “Why Post- structuralism is a Dead End for Progressive Thought,” Barbara Epstein claims, “the underlying assumptions of poststructuralism conflict with the assumptions that are necessary for radical politics.”4 Epstein is particularly concerned with feminist poststructuralism, which she claims is amoral and “is a campaign against the basic structures of thought and language.”5 She is not alone in her condem- nation of poststructuralism. Many feminists share her
    [Show full text]
  • Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory
    Journal of Feminist Scholarship Volume 4 Issue 4 Spring 2013 Article 5 Spring 2013 Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory Susan Archer Mann University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Women's History Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Mann, Susan A.. 2018. "Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory." Journal of Feminist Scholarship 4 (Spring): 54-73. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs/vol4/iss4/5 This Viewpoint is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Feminist Scholarship by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory Cover Page Footnote The author wishes to thank Oxford University Press for giving her permission to draw from Chapters 1, 5, 6, 7, and the Conclusion of Doing Feminist Theory: From Modernity to Postmodernity (2012). This viewpoint is available in Journal of Feminist Scholarship: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs/vol4/iss4/5 Mann: Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage VIEWPOINT Third Wave Feminism’s Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory Susan Archer Mann, University of New Orleans Abstract: This article first traces the history of unhappy marriages of disparate theoretical perspectives in US feminism. In recent decades, US third-wave authors have arranged their own unhappy marriage in that their major publications reflect an attempt to wed poststructuralism with intersectionality theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Critical Realist Positional Approach to Intersectionality
    Developing a Critical Realist Positional Approach to Intersectionality ANGELA MARTINEZ DY University of Nottingham LEE MARTIN University of Nottingham SUSAN MARLOW University of Nottingham This article identifies philosophical tensions and limitations within contemporary intersectionality theory which, it will be argued, have hindered its ability to explain how positioning in multiple social categories can affect life chances and influence the reproduction of inequality. We draw upon critical realism to propose an augmented conceptual framework and novel methodological approach that offers the potential to move beyond these debates, so as to better enable intersectionality to provide causal explanatory accounts of the ‘lived experiences’ of social privilege and disadvantage. KEYWORDS critical realism, critique, feminism, intersectionality, methodology, ontology Introduction Intersectionality has emerged over the past thirty years as an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing the concurrent impacts of social structures, with a focus on theorizing how belonging to multiple exclusionary social categories can influence political access and equality.1 It conceptualizes the interaction of categories of difference such as gender, race and class at many levels, including individual experience, social practices, institutions and ideologies, and frames the outcomes of these interactions in terms of the distribution and allocation of power.2 As a form of social critique originally rooted in black feminism,3 intersectionality is described by Jennifer
    [Show full text]
  • University of Hawaiii Library a Path Toward Gender
    UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIII LIBRARY A PATH TOWARD GENDER EQUALITY: STATE FEMINISM IN JAPAN A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE DECEMBER 2002 By Yoshie Kobayashi Dissertation Committee: Yasumasa Kuroda, Chairperson Kathy E. Ferguson James A. Dator KateZhou Takie S. Lebra ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many individuals and institutions for help with the writing of this dissertation. Singled out first for thanks are five professors at the University of Hawai'i, Manoa, who assisted me to shape the content of this dissertation. I am especially grateful to Yasumasa Kuroda, who was the supervisor of my dissertation and provided me essential intellectual and moral support and advice throughout the dissertation project. In a variety of ways, Kathy Ferguson's insightful criticism, comments, and copious and tireless editing during the dissertation process monitored the direction and clarified my arguments. James Dator and Kate Zhou were sources of substantive insight and personal encouragement throughout this dissertation project. I was also privileged to benefit from Takie S. Lebra's expertise in connecting a theoretical scheme with empirical findings. I also thank them for their support during my graduate school years. I appreciate the institutional support at the University of Hawaii, Manoa­ the Department of pOI~1 science and the Center for Japanese Studies. I gratefully acknowledge academic support from teachers of my undergraduate and master programs, although they were not directly involved in this work. For his comments and advice, I would like to express appreciations to Tanaka Yasumasa, who was my teacher of political science in GakushUin University, Tokyo and encouraged me to study in graduate programs in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • American Athena a Feminist Sophistic Analysis of the Discourses of Women Servicemembers
    American Athena A Feminist Sophistic Analysis of the Discourses of Women Servicemembers Nancy Ann Fox A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2020 Reading Committee: Gail Stygall, Chair Anis Bawarshi Candice Rai Christine Harold Program Authorized to Offer Degree English © Copyright 2020 Nancy Ann Fox University of Washington Abstract American Athena: A Feminist Sophistic Analysis of the Discourses of Women Servicemembers Nancy Ann Fox Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Gail Stygall Department of English In classical mythology the goddess Athena is the embodiment of strategic intelligence and prowess in war. She inherited these gifts from her mother, Metis, who carried her to full maturity within the body of her father, Zeus, from whose forehead she was delivered, armed for battle. In this guise she serves as representation for the identities created and conveyed in the discourses of American women servicemembers. This study presents a grounded theory analysis of 99 narratives collected from personal interviews and culled from published sources in which women describe and interpret their experiences as enlisted personnel in the U.S. military. This method, discovered in the 1960’s by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss, studies narrative content to discern an emergent theory from that data. Recent renovation of this method by Kathy Charmaz, Adele E. Clarke, and others allows for this theory to align with existing ideas, if relevant and not imposed on the data a priori – which led to the feminist sophistic design of this Athena study, the terms derived from the work of classicist Susan Jarratt and defined by values within the narratives themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Situated Knowledges: the Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective Author(S): Donna Haraway Source: Feminist Studies, Vol
    Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective Author(s): Donna Haraway Source: Feminist Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Autumn, 1988), pp. 575-599 Published by: Feminist Studies, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3178066 Accessed: 17/04/2009 15:40 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=femstudies. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Feminist Studies, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Feminist Studies. http://www.jstor.org SITUATEDKNOWLEDGES: THE SCIENCEQUESTION IN FEMINISM AND THE PRIVILEGEOF PARTIAL PERSPECTIVE DONNA HARAWAY Academic and activist feminist inquiry has repeatedly tried to come to terms with the question of what we might mean by the curious and inescapableterm "objectivity."We have used a lot of toxic ink and trees processedinto paper decryingwhat theyhave meant and how it hurts us.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Gender with Libraries and Archives the Power of Information
    Teaching Gender with Libraries and Archives The Power of Information i5 Libraries 00 book.indb 1 2013.10.04. 9:49 Titles in the Series: 1. Teaching with Memories. European Women’s Histories in International and Interdisciplinary Classrooms 2. Teaching Gender, Diversity and Urban Space. An Intersectional Approach between Gender Studies and Spatial Disciplines 3. Teaching Gender in Social Work 4. Teaching Subjectivity. Travelling Selves for Feminist Pedagogy 5. Teaching with the Third Wave. New Feminists’ Explorations of Teaching and Institutional Contexts 6. Teaching Visual Culture in an Interdisciplinary Classroom. Feminist (Re)Interpretations of the Field 7. Teaching Empires. Gender and Transnational Citizenship in Europe 8. Teaching Intersectionality. Putting Gender at the Centre 9. Teaching “Race” with a Gendered Edge 10. Teaching Gender with Libraries and Archives The Power of Information Title 1 is published by ATHENA2 and Women’s Studies Centre, National University of Ireland, Gal- way; Titles 2–8 are published by ATHENA3 Advanced Thematic Network in Women’s Studies in Europe, University of Utrecht and Centre for Gender Studies, Stockholm University; Title 9-10 are jointly published by ATGENDER, The European Association for Gender Research, Edu- cation and Documentation, Utrecht and Central European University Press, Budapest. i5 Libraries 00 book.indb 2 2013.10.04. 9:49 Edited by Sara de Jong and Sanne Koevoets Teaching Gender with Libraries and Archives The Power of Information Teaching with Gender. European Women’s Studies in International and Interdisciplinary Classrooms A book series by ATGENDER ATGENDER. The European Association for Gender Research, Education and Documentation Utrecht & Central European University Press Budapest–New York i5 Libraries 00 book.indb 3 2013.10.04.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiv/Aids and Identity Recovery: Stitching the Self Back Together
    HIV/AIDS AND IDENTITY RECOVERY: STITCHING THE SELF BACK TOGETHER by KAITLIN JESSICA SCHWAN A thesis submitted to the Department of Art In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Masters of Art Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (September, 2009) Copyright © Kaitlin Jessica Schwan, 2009 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-65228-2 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-65228-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study in the Philosophy of Simone De Beauvoir A
    i ENGENDERING SUBJECTIVITY: A STUDY IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Jina M. Fast December 2014 Examining Committee Members: Dr. Lewis Gordon, Chair, Temple University, Philosophy Department Dr. Joseph Margolis, Temple University, Philosophy Department Dr. Miriam Solomon, Temple University, Philosophy Department Dr. Sally Scholz, External Member, Villanova University, Philosophy Department ii ABSTRACT In this study I advance the thesis that Simone de Beauvoir’s account of the development of subjectivity is based in a consideration of the Hegelian description of the development of subjectivity in the Phenomenology of Spirit. Like Hegel, Beauvoir argues that an aspect of the development of subjectivity is the ability to discover oneself as related to the collective world. Additionally, she shows through her various works that individual identity and freedom are conditioned by the possibility for intersubjective recognition, and development of a project within an ambiguous relationship between the self, others, and the shared social world. Nevertheless, throughout history this foundation for the possibility of freedom has often been lacking and more so for some groups than others, which points us to an important difference in focus in Hegel and Beauvoir’s work. For one, the subject in the idealized Hegelian account comes to recognize its power and freedom as it progresses in its connections and influence within the world. But, for those who have historically lacked options (women, those who happen to be black, the poor, etc.) transcendence in terms of the actualization of one’s identity and recognized participation in the collective is at best often co-opted or concealed and at worst impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Standpoint Theory: Conceptualization and Utility Lina Gurung
    106 Lina Gurung Received: 2020-01-22 Accepted: 2020-10-25 Feminist Standpoint Theory: Conceptualization and Utility Lina Gurung Abstract Feminist Standpoint theory challenges the notion of conventional scientific practices that had excluded women from the inquiry and marginalize them in every aspect of knowledge benefits and construction. Amidst the prevalent controversies, standpoint theorists have proposed alternative knowledge construction with the theses of ‘strong objectivity’, ‘situated knowledge’, ‘epistemic advantage’, and ‘power relations’. Feminist standpoint theory is claimed to be a successful methodology and the author support this argument based on the four reasons; the logic of discovery, insider-outsider position, study up, and methodological innovation. The author also put forwards the various challenges confronted by feminist standpoint theory and the justification given by the theorists. The cognitive, methodological, and epistemological interrogations toward this theory have widened its scope and adoption in social science research. The paper aims to suggest this analysis as the most suitable analytical and theoretical approach to do feminist inquiry which brings the understanding of feminist epistemologies as the most appropriate alternative approach of recent inquires against the dominant practices. Keywords: feminist standpoint theory, feminist epistemologies, feminist methodology, feminist inquiry epistemological approaches. Introduction The embodied nature of research in conventional social research investigated, explained, and saw the society Along with the feminist movement in the 1970s, from the masculine perspective. Feminists have argued there was an equal concern with the conventional social that the scientific discourses developed from such male sciences, which reflected the male values, knowledge, and perspective inherently silence those not included within experience. The academia was criticized for their scientific the value of rationality and objectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Application of Feminist Standpoint Theory in Social Research María Silvestre Cabrera1; María López Belloso2 Y Raquel Royo Prieto3
    MONOGRÁFICO Investigaciones Feministas ISSN-e: 2171-6080 http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/infe.66034 The application of Feminist Standpoint Theory in social research María Silvestre Cabrera1; María López Belloso2 y Raquel Royo Prieto3 Recibido: Octubre 2019 / Revisado: Enero 2020 / Aceptado: Marzo 2020 Abstract. This article assumes a priori that feminist epistemology must necessarily imply the definition and application of a methodology that is capable of analysing knowledge from a situated perspective, making visible the restrictions of gender, class, ethnicity, and in summary, of the social location. Feminist Standpoint Theory (FST) set out by authors such as Sandra Harding, calls on those who have not had access to power and areas of decision-making to participate in the construction of knowledge and in the social construction of reality. In this article, we claim for a need of a sociological investigation based on FST and provide some examples and evidence of the knowledge generated by women’s voices building on the analysis of 10 doctoral theses. The methodology used is based on the analysis of the topics chosen by the thesis, the formulation of its objectives and the bibliography used. Likewise, we have developed a so-called “Harding test” grounded on her postulates, which has allowed us to assess the doctoral theses analysed and to reflect about the empirical contributions of the research, the feminist commitment and what the subject / object relationship should be in feminist epistemology. Keywords: Feminist Standpoint Theory; Intersectionality; Feminist analysis. [es] La aplicación de la Feminist Standpoint Theory en la investigación social Resumen. Este artículo asume el a priori de que la epistemología feminista debe necesariamente implicar la definición y aplicación de una metodología que sea capaz de analizar el conocimiento de manera situada, dando visibilidad a las restricciones de género, clase, etnia, en resumen, de la posición social.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Feminist and Gender Theories
    7 FEMINIST AND GENDER THEORIES Key Concepts Relations of Ruling Bifurcation of Consciousness Institutional Ethnography Standpoint Theory Dorothy E. Smith Key Concepts Standpoint Epistemology Black Feminist Thought Matrix of Domination Patricia Hill Collins Key Concepts Object Relations Theory Nancy Chodorow 312 Feminist and Gender Theories 313 Key Concepts Hegemonic Masculinity Patriarchal Dividend R. W. Connell Key Concepts Queer Theory Heterosexual Matrix Performativity Judith Butler There is no original or primary gender a drag imitates, but gender is a kind of imitation for which there is no original. —Judith Butler A Brief History of Women’s Rights in the United States 1700s American colonial law held that “by marriage, the husband and wife are one person in the law. The very being and legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated into that of her husband under whose wing and protection she performs everything.” By 1777, women are denied the right to vote in all states in the United States. (Continued) 314 SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY IN THE CONTEMPORARY ERA (Continued) 1800s In Missouri v. Celia (1855), a slave, a black woman, is declared to be property with- out the right to defend herself against a master’s act of rape. In 1866, the Fourteenth Amendment is passed by Congress (ratified by the states in 1868). It is the first time “citizens” and “voters” are defined as male in the U.S. Constitution. 1900s In 1920, the Nineteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is ratified. It declares, “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.” In 1923, the Equal Rights Amendment is introduced in Congress in the United States.
    [Show full text]