DOCSLIB.ORG

Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy APA Newsletters Volume 06, Number 1 Fall 2006 NEWSLETTER ON FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY FROM THE EDITOR, SALLY J. SCHOLZ ABOUT THE NEWSLETTER ON FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND INFORMATION NEWS FROM THE COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN, ROSEMARIE TONG ARTICLES SHARON CRASNOW “Activist Research and the Objectivity of Science” CARMELA EPRIGHT “Praxis and the “F” Word: Young Women, Feminism, Fear” BOOK REVIEWS Naomi Zack: Inclusive Feminism: A Third Wave Theory of Women’s Commonality REVIEWED BY CLEA F. REES Sharyn Clough: Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies REVIEWED BY NANCY M. WILLIAMS © 2006 by The American Philosophical Association ISSN: 1067-9464 Cassandra Pinnick, Noretta Koertge, and Robert Almeder: Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology: An Examination of Gender in Science REVIEWED BY SHARYN CLOUGH Christina Erneling and David Martel, eds.: The Mind as a Scientific Object REVIEWED BY CARMEL FORDE Elizabeth Grosz: Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power REVIEWED BY CATHERINE VILLANUEVA GARDNER Rebecca Kukla: Mass Hysteria: Medicine, Culture, and Mothers’ Bodies REVIEWED BY LAURA NEWHART Maurice Hamington and Dorothy C. Miller, eds.: Socializing Care REVIEWED BY LAUREN FLEMING Lisa Adkins and Beverly Skeggs: Feminism after Bourdieu REVIEWED BY CHRISTINA SMERICK Maria Falco, ed.: Feminist Interpretations of Niccolò Macchiavelli REVIEWED BY MINDY PEDEN Peter Knox-Shaw: Jane Austen and the Enlightenment REVIEWED BY MONICA SHORES Lorraine Code, ed.: Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer REVIEWED BY JAMEY FINDLING Jane Duran: Eight Women Philosophers: Theory, Politics, and Feminism REVIEWED BY MAURICE HAMINGTON Sally J. Scholz and Shannon M. Mussett, eds.: The Contradictions of Freedom: Philosophical Essays on Simone de Beauvoir’s The Mandarins REVIEWED BY ROBIN MARGARET JAMES Margaret A. Simons, Marybeth Timmerman, and Mary Beth Mader, eds.: Simone de Beauvoir: Philosophical Writings REVIEWED BY DERA SIPE CONTRIBUTORS APA NEWSLETTER ON Feminism and Philosophy Sally J. Scholz, Editor Fall 2006 Volume 06, Number 1 careful analysis of class and race bias in a liberal feminist claim ROM THE DITOR for women’s right or duty to work in the paid labor force. They F E also reveal a sort of paradox as the goals of feminism appear accomplished to some, while others among us view sexist oppression as well-entrenched and in need of further feminist More than one popular media outlet has asked whether response. feminism is dead. Certainly we know that rumors of its death Epright examines this phenomenon of the paradox of have been greatly exaggerated. But what some of the queries feminism as advocate for personal choice by sharing some of reveal is wonderment about activism. Activists of every sort— her students’ responses to an introduction to feminist theory not just feminist—have sought innovative and creative avenues class. Epright’s sometimes wry look at how feminism is received for effecting social change. Protesting has not lost its power, but by conservative college students adds a subtlety to the analysis, door-to-door organizing, email campaigns, online petitions and including the students’ own reluctance to recognize how blogs, civic organizations and lobbying, and even legislative oppression might structure their lives. She argues, “Because initiatives have come to replace some of the in-your-face/in- feminist theory recognizes that there are contradictory and your-street political activism that characterized earlier years in confusing questions to be asked about women’s experience, the feminist campaign. Moreover, as feminist theory continues embracing feminism as a way of being in the world, as opposed to make in-roads in theory and practice, activism changes or to merely viewing it as a way of reading and thinking through adapts in order to seek new goals or advance new ideals. texts, would require them to accept more ambiguity and tolerate Sharon Crasnow asks about the proper role of activism more complexity than their familial, religious, and cultural in scientific inquiry in her article, “Activist Research and the conceptions will permit.” As teachers of feminist theory, many Objectivity of Science.” Contrary to the more common view of us have confronted the dilemma Epright discusses. Her article that activist commitments “impede gathering, interpreting, offers a helpful way to think through our obligations as teachers, and evaluating evidence and thus compromise objectivity,” activists, feminists, and philosophers. Crasnow argues that “activism is one of the means through The rest of the issue features fourteen book reviews ranging which standpoint can be achieved.” She employs the particular from feminist philosophy of science to maternal bodies and case of an anthropologist who, because of her activism with care, from feminist critiques and appropriations of canonical the women of her study community, came to see not just the figures to contributions of specific feminist philosophers. effects of oppressive practices but also the social structure that Reviewers do us all a tremendous service, and I would like maintained it. Crasnow’s article is suggestive on a number to express my gratitude to the many people who have written of levels. In addition to encouraging scholars to see the reviews for this Newsletter. New books continue to come in—a practical challenges of their theories, it expands what might sign of our ever-present activism within the academy—and new be understood as activism. Can our scholarship be seen as reviewers are needed. If you would like to write a review, please activism insofar as it pushes the boundaries of traditional theory send me your CV by email. This is an excellent opportunity for or challenges oppressive structures within that theory? established scholars and graduate students alike. Carmela Epright’s comments in “Praxis and the ‘F’ Word: Young Women, Feminism, Fear” come at an interesting time. Endnotes A recent article in Newsweek magazine featuring a discussion 1. “Fast Chat: Managing Mommies,” Newsweek, (June 19, 2006): with Linda Hirshman sparked numerous hostile responses.1 10. Hirshman’s book is Get to Work: A Manifesto for Women Hirshman had said that women must work outside the home of the World (New York: Viking, 2006). in order to have a political voice. Most of the letters in response 2. Letters: “The Mommy Wars Rage On,” Newsweek, (July 10, claimed that feminism is about choice, and women’s decision 2006): 26 & 30. to stay at home should be affirmed by feminists rather than 3. Ibid., 26. disparaged.2 As one letter writer put it, the view that women 4. Ibid., 30. must work outside the home “is extremely skewed and goes against the entire concept of what feminism stands for. My understanding of feminism is that it’s the right for a woman to choose the path that is best for her, whether that be working ABOUT THE NEWSLETTER ON a full-time job or being a full-time mom.”3 Another indicated that her experiences in parent organizations and community FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY volunteer opportunities gave her the political power and social honor Hirshman claimed was only possible through paid work.4 These letters might be written off as simplistic understandings The Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy is sponsored by the of feminism, but that might be a mistake. They offer sometimes APA Committee on the Status of Women (CSW). The Newsletter — APA Newsletter, Fall 2006, Volume 06, Number 1 — is designed to provide an introduction to recent philosophical organized a panel on “Women’s Choices: Family Matters in work that addresses issues of gender. None of the varied the Profession” and a panel on “Publishing as a Feminist” at philosophical views presented by authors of Newsletter articles the 2006 Pacific Division meeting. Anita Superson organized a necessarily reflects the views of any or all of the members of panel on “Teaching in a Climate of Conservation” and a panel on the Committee on the Status of Women, including the editor(s) “Feminism and Disability” at the 2006 Central Division meeting. of the Newsletter, nor does the committee advocate any Among the co-sponsors of one or more of these panels were particular type of feminist philosophy. We advocate only that the Committee on Inclusiveness, the Committee for the Defense serious philosophical attention be given to issues of gender of Professional Rights of Philosophers, and the Committee on and that claims of gender bias in philosophy receive full and Philosophy and Law. The CSW makes a point of collaborating fair consideration. whenever possible with other committees attentive to the voices and interests of women philosophers. As usual, the CSW focused some attention on (1) structural issues such as the Committee on Committees’ criteria for SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND selection of new committee members and chairs and (2) financial issues such as the size of the annual budgets provided INFORMATION by the National Office to the various standing and diversity committees. In the main, however, the CSW reflected on the fact that despite all the progress women in the profession 1. Purpose: The purpose of the Newsletter is to publish have made, philosophy remains what may be the most male- information about the status of women in philosophy and populated field in the humanities. According to available APA to make the resources of feminist philosophy more widely data, a persistent 75 percent male/25 percent female breakdown available. The Newsletter contains discussions of recent seems to be our profession’s continuing fate. Moreover, as developments in feminist philosophy and related work in other Margaret Urban Walker has noted, a “discussive/professional disciplines, literature overviews and book reviews, suggestions tipping point,” at which women’s ways of thinking, doing, and for eliminating gender bias in the traditional philosophy speaking are just as likely to be the order of the day as men’s, curriculum, and reflections on feminist pedagogy. It also informs does not occur until a profession is well over 30 percent female, the profession about the work of the APA Committee on the most usually 50 percent female.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symposium on Eileen Hunt Botting's Wollstonecraft, Mill
    PTXXXX10.1177/0090591717725310Political TheoryReview Symposium 725310book-review2017 Review Symposium Political Theory 1 –29 Symposium on © The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: Eileen Hunt Botting’s sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591717725310DOI: 10.1177/0090591717725310 Wollstonecraft, Mill, journals.sagepub.com/home/ptx and Women’s Human Rights (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016) Women’s Human Rights, Then and Now Ruth Abbey University of Notre Dame Linda M.G. Zerilli University of Chicago Alasdair MacIntyre University of Notre Dame Eileen Hunt Botting University of Notre Dame Comments by Ruth Abbey This is a fitting sequel to Eileen Hunt Botting’s first book, Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke, and Rousseau on the Transformation of the Family.1 That book placed Mary Wollstonecraft in conversation with two other eigh- teenth-century thinkers, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Edmund Burke. In this more recent work, Botting traces Wollstonecraft’s impact forward from her own time to ours, examining how her theologically based approach to women’s rights resonates, or fails to, in contemporary women’s rights thinking. Botting contrasts Wollstonecraft’s religious approach to women’s rights with that of her successor, John Stuart Mill, who agreed with many of Wollstonecraft’s substantive recommendations about women’s equality and freedom but justified them on a more secular, utilitarian basis. 2 Political Theory 00(0) Juxtaposing Wollstonecraft’s “rational theology” and Mill’s “liberal utili- tarianism” in this way is very helpful. Having usually read and placed them in succession as pioneering theorists of women’s rights, their juxtaposition forced me to think harder about their similarities and their differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Dressing in the Master's Clothes
    Book Review Cross-Dressing in the Master's Clothes Kathryn Abrams' Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What To Do About It. By Joan Williams.' New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pp. 338. $30.00. Feminist legal theory has, famously, spotlighted the connection between substance and method.' Epistemological assumptions, forms of reasoning, even nuances of tone, feminists remind us, can help to entrench or disrupt damaging gender rules or norms. Thus, feminist legal work has often nested a substantive critique in a broad challenge to the norms of legal scholarship, legal reasoning, or both. Joan Williams's new book, Unbending Gender,2 exemplifies this approach. She has as much to say about the way that change should be framed, debated, and produced as she does about the particular changes that are required. And her offerings in " Professor of Law, Cornell Law School. I am grateful to Martha Fineman for her very thoughtful comments on a draft of this review, and to Lani Guinier. Bill Kell. and Lee Teitelbaum for conversations on the subject of this review. I am also grateful to the University of Connecticut Law School, whose Gallivan Conference on Real Property provided me with my first introduction to Williams's book, and the Project on Work and Family of the Washington College of Law at American University, whose conference on Hegemonic and Resistant Genderings gave me further opportunity to reflect on these ideas. * Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law. Georgetown University Law Center. 1. Examples of works highlighting this connection abound. In law, see, for example, Kathryn Abrams, Hearing the Call of Stories, 79 CAL.
    [Show full text]
  • Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research
    Objectivity and Diversity Objectivity and Diversity Another Logic of Scientific Research Sandra Harding The University of Chicago Press :: Chicago and London Sandra Harding is Distinguished Professor of Education and Gender Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles, and Distinguished Affiliate Professor of Philosophy at Michigan State University. She is the editor of The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader and the author of Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2015 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2015. Printed in the United States of America 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15â 1 2 3 4 5 ISBN - 13: 978- 0- 226- 24122- 7 (cloth) ISBN - 13: 978- 0- 226- 24136- 4 (paper) ISBN - 13: 978- 0- 226- 24153- 1 (e- book) DOI : 10.7208/chicago/9780226241531.001.0001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Harding, Sandra G., author. Objectivity and diversity : another logic of scientific research / Sandra Harding. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-226-24122-7 (cloth : alk. paper)— ISBN 978-0-226-24136-4 (pbk. : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-0-226-24153-1 (e-book) 1. Science—Philosophy. 2. Objectivity. 3. Science—Social aspects. I. Title Q 175.H 324 2015 507.2—dc23 2014041598 a This paper meets the requirements of ANSI / NISO Z 39.48- 1992 (Permanence of Paper). Contents Acknowledgments vii Preface ix 1 New Citizens, New Societies: New Sciences, New Philosophies? 1 2 Stronger Objectivity for Sciences from Below 26 3 Women, Gender, Development: Maximally Objective Research? 52 4 Do Micronesian Navigators Practice Science? 80 5 Pluralism, Multiplicity, and the Disunity of Sciences 105 6 Must Sciences Be Secular? 127 7 After Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2019 A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry Karina Bucciarelli Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses Part of the Epistemology Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Bucciarelli, Karina, "A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry" (2019). Scripps Senior Theses. 1365. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/1365 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK: PREVENTING KNOWLEDGE DISTORTIONS IN SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY by KARINA MARTINS BUCCIARELLI SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR SUSAN CASTAGNETTO PROFESSOR RIMA BASU APRIL 26, 2019 Bucciarelli 2 Acknowledgements First off, I would like to thank my wonderful family for supporting me every step of the way. Mamãe e Papai, obrigada pelo amor e carinho, mil telefonemas, conversas e risadas. Obrigada por não só proporcionar essa educação incrível, mas também me dar um exemplo de como viver. Rafa, thanks for the jokes, the editing help and the spontaneous phone calls. Bela, thank you for the endless time you give to me, for your patience and for your support (even through WhatsApp audios). To my dear friends, thank you for the late study nights, the wild dance parties, the laughs and the endless support.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Feminist Ethics
    RETHINKING FEMINIST ETHICS The question of whether there can be distinctively female ethics is one of the most important and controversial debates in current gender studies, philosophy and psychology. Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care, Trust and Empathy marks a bold intervention in these debates by bridging the ground between women theorists disenchanted with aspects of traditional ‘male’ ethics and traditional theorists who insist upon the need for some ethical principles. Daryl Koehn provides one of the first critical overviews of a wide range of alternative female/ feminist/feminine ethics defended by influential theorists such as Carol Gilligan, Annette Baier, Nel Noddings and Diana Meyers. She shows why these ethics in their current form are not defensible and proposes a radically new alternative. In the first section, Koehn identifies the major tenets of ethics of care, trust and empathy. She provides a lucid, searching analysis of why female ethics emphasize a relational, rather than individualistic, self and why they favor a more empathic, less rule-based, approach to human interactions. At the heart of the debate over alternative ethics is the question of whether female ethics of care, trust and empathy constitute a realistic, practical alternative to the rule- based ethics of Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill and John Rawls. Koehn concludes that they do not. Female ethics are plagued by many of the same problems they impute to ‘male’ ethics, including a failure to respect other individuals. In particular, female ethics favor the perspective of the caregiver, trustor and empathizer over the viewpoint of those who are on the receiving end of care, trust and empathy.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory
    Journal of Feminist Scholarship Volume 4 Issue 4 Spring 2013 Article 5 Spring 2013 Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory Susan Archer Mann University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Women's History Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Mann, Susan A.. 2018. "Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory." Journal of Feminist Scholarship 4 (Spring): 54-73. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs/vol4/iss4/5 This Viewpoint is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Feminist Scholarship by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory Cover Page Footnote The author wishes to thank Oxford University Press for giving her permission to draw from Chapters 1, 5, 6, 7, and the Conclusion of Doing Feminist Theory: From Modernity to Postmodernity (2012). This viewpoint is available in Journal of Feminist Scholarship: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs/vol4/iss4/5 Mann: Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage VIEWPOINT Third Wave Feminism’s Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory Susan Archer Mann, University of New Orleans Abstract: This article first traces the history of unhappy marriages of disparate theoretical perspectives in US feminism. In recent decades, US third-wave authors have arranged their own unhappy marriage in that their major publications reflect an attempt to wed poststructuralism with intersectionality theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Deconstruction, Feminism, and Law: Cornell and Mackinnon on Female Subjectivity and Resistance
    082205 CLARK.DOC 11/11/2005 9:18 AM DECONSTRUCTION, FEMINISM, AND LAW: CORNELL AND MACKINNON ON FEMALE SUBJECTIVITY AND RESISTANCE M. J. CLARK* In examining familiar things we come to such unfamiliar conclusions that our very language is twisted and bent even as it guides us. Writing “under erasure” is the mark of this contortion.1 What, then, is truth? A mobile army of metaphors metonymies, anthropomorphisms . truths are illusions of which one has forgotten that they are illusions coins which having lost their stamp, are now regarded as metal and no longer as coins.2 Yet a gaze averted from the beaten track, a hatred of brutality, a search for fresh concepts not yet encompassed by the general pattern, is the last hope for thought. In an intellectual hierarchy which constantly makes everyone answerable, unanswerability alone can call the hierarchy directly by its name.3 Sexual difference is one of the major philosophical issues of . our age. According to Heidegger, each age has one issue to think through, and one only. Sexual difference is 4 probably the issue in our time which could be our “salvation” if we thought it through. I. INTRODUCTION: POSTRUCTURALISM AND LAW In 1967, Jacques Derrida published three philosophical works that altered the critical and philosophical landscape of the late twentieth century. Those works—Of Grammatology, Speech and Phenomena, and Writing and Difference— attempted to rethink the very fabric of thinking itself, and aimed at displacing a mode of reasoning that Derrida argued intrinsically required dominance as a condition of its operation.5 In brief, Derrida argued that Western philosophy, and by inference Western modes of rationality and being, were based on a desire * Michael J.
    [Show full text]
  • Christina Hoff Sommers
    A Conversation with CHRISTINA HOFF SOMMERS A resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and former philosophy professor, Christina Hoff Sommers is a thoughtful analyst and trenchant critic of radical feminism. In this conversation, Sommers and Kristol discuss how American feminism, once focused on practical questions such as equal opportunity in employment for women, instead became a radical ideology that questioned the reality of sex differences. Narrating her own experiences as a speaker on college campuses, Sommers explains how the radical feminism of today's universities stifles debate. Finally, Sommers explains a recent controversy in the video game community, which she defends from charges of sexism in a widely-publicized episode known as "GamerGate." On claims of a “rape epidemic” on campus, Sommers says: It’s the result of advocacy research. You can get very alarming findings if you’re willing to interview a non-representative sample of people and if you’re willing to include a lot of behavior most of us don’t think of as assault. If you just play with those, you can get an epidemic. Rape, like all crimes, is way down. It’s at I think a 41- year low. [Rape on campus] is not 1 in 4, or 1 in 5 women, but something like 1 in 50. Still too much. But not [an epidemic]. On the feminist denial of sex differences, Sommers says: Femininity and masculinity are real. Women tend to be more nurturing and risk-averse and have usually a richer emotional vocabulary. Men tend to be a little less explicit about their emotions.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism, Radicalism, and Legal Scholarship Steven H
    Cornell Law Library Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 8-1983 Liberalism, Radicalism, and Legal Scholarship Steven H. Shiffrin Cornell Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub Part of the Law and Philosophy Commons, and the Legal History, Theory and Process Commons Recommended Citation Shiffrin, Steven H., "Liberalism, Radicalism, and Legal Scholarship" (1983). Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 1176. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/1176 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE LIBERALISM, RADICALISM, AND LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP Steven Shiffrin*t INTRODUCTION In the eighteenth century, Kant answered the utilitarians.I In the nineteenth century, without embracing utilitarianism, 2 Hegel * Professor of Law, UCLA. This project started out as a broad piece entitled "Away From a General Theory of the First Amendment." It has taken on un- bounded proportions and might as well be called "Away From A General Theory of Everything." During the several years I have worked on it, more than thirty friends and colleagues have read one version or another and have given me helpful com- ments. Listing them all would look silly, but I am grateful to each of them, especially to those who responded in such detail. I would especially like to thank Dru Cornell, who served early in the project as a research assistant and thereafter offered counsel, particularly lending her expertise on continental philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Content Analysis of the Women Against Feminism Tumblr Page Lyndsey S
    Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Theses and Dissertations 2015 A Content Analysis of the Women Against Feminism Tumblr Page Lyndsey S . Collins Lehigh University Follow this and additional works at: http://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Collins, Lyndsey S ., "A Content Analysis of the Women Against Feminism Tumblr Page" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 2559. http://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd/2559 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Content Analysis of the Women Against Feminism Tumblr by Lyndsey S. Collins A Thesis Presented to the Graduate and Research Committee of Lehigh University in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts in Sociology Lehigh University May 18, 2015 © 2015 Copyright (Lyndsey S. Collins) ii Thesis is accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in Sociology. A Content Analysis of the Women Against Feminism Tumblr Page Lyndsey Collins ____________________ Date Approved Dr. Jacqueline Krasas Dr. Yuping Zhang Dr. Nicola Tannenbaum iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my thesis advisor, Dr. Jacqueline Krasas, who has provided me with invaluable insights, support, and encouragement throughout the entirety of this process. In addition, I would like to thank my committee members, Dr. Nicola Tannenbaum
    [Show full text]
  • Presentations Introduction Recent Feminist De
    Beyond the Generational Line: An Exploration of Feminist Online Sites and Self-(Re)presentations Yi-lin Yu National Ilan University, Taiwan Abstract This article deals with the feminist generation issue by tracing the transition from generational to non-generational thinking in recent feminist discourse on third-wave feminism. Informed by certain feminist recommendations of affording alternative paradigms in place of the oceanic wave metaphor to describe the rela- tionships between different feminists, this study offers the insights gained from an investigation with three feminist online sites, The F Word, Eminism, and Guerrilla Girls, in which these online feminists have participated in building up a third wave consciousness or a third space site through their engagement in (re)presenting their feminist selves and identities. In developing a both/and third wave con- sciousness, these online feminists have bypassed the dualistic understanding of sec- ond and third wave feminism and reached a cross-generational commonality of adhering to feminist ideology and coalition in cyberspace as a third space. Through a content analysis of their online feminist self-(re)presentations, this pa- per concludes by arguing that they have not only reformulated the concept of third wave feminism but also worked toward a new configuration of third space narratives and subjectivities that sheds light on contemporary feminist thinking about feminist genealogy and history. Key words third-wave feminism, feminist generation, feminist online sites, self-(re)presentation Introduction Recent feminist development of third-wave discourses has been bom- barded with a conundrum regarding generational debates. Although 54 ❙ Yi-lin Yu some feminist scholars are preoccupied with using familial metaphors to depict different feminist generations, others have called forth a rethink- ing of the topic in non-generational terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography.Pdf
    Bibliography AAAAI 2000 Allergy Report vols. I–III. The American meta-analysis.” Annals of Epidemiology 8:64–74. Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, ACS 1999 Cancer Facts and Figures – 1999. Atlanta, GA: in partnership with the National Institute of American Cancer Society. Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). 2000 “How has the occurrence of breast cancer http://www.theallergyreport.org/. changed over time?” Atlanta, GA: American Abdulaziz, Abuzinda and Fridhelm Krupp 1997 Cancer Society. http://www.cancer.org/ “What happened to the Gulf: two years after statistics/99bcff/occurrence.html. the world’s greatest oil-slick.” Arabian Wildlife Acsadi, George and J. Nemeskeri 1970 History of 2:1. http://www.arabianwildlife.com/past_arw/ Human Life Span and Mortality. Budapest: vol2.1/oilglf.htm. Akademiai Kiado. Abell, Annette, Erik Ernst and Jens Peter Bonde Adams, John 1995 Risk. London: University College 1994 “High sperm density among members of London Press. organic farmers’ association.” The Lancet Adams, W. C. 1986 “Whose lives count? TV coverage 343:1,498. of natural disasters.” Journal of Communication Abelson, Philip H. 1994 “Editorial: adequate 36(2):113–22. supplies of fruits and vegetables.” Science Adleman, Morris A. 1995 “Trends in the price and 266:1,303. supply of oil.” In Simon 1995b:287–93. Abrahamsen, Gunnar, Arne O. Stuames and Bjørn AEA 1999 Economic Evaluation of Air Quality Targets Tveite 1994a “Discussion and synthesis.” In for CO and Benzene. By AEA Technology Abrahamsen et al. 1994c:297–331. for European Commission DGXI. 1994b: “Summary and conclusions.” In http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ Abrahamsen et al.
    [Show full text]