DOCSLIB.ORG

Situated Knowledges: the Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective Author(S): Donna Haraway Source: Feminist Studies, Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Situated Knowledges: the Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective Author(S): Donna Haraway Source: Feminist Studies, Vol Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective Author(s): Donna Haraway Source: Feminist Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Autumn, 1988), pp. 575-599 Published by: Feminist Studies, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3178066 Accessed: 17/04/2009 15:40 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=femstudies. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Feminist Studies, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Feminist Studies. http://www.jstor.org SITUATEDKNOWLEDGES: THE SCIENCEQUESTION IN FEMINISM AND THE PRIVILEGEOF PARTIAL PERSPECTIVE DONNA HARAWAY Academic and activist feminist inquiry has repeatedly tried to come to terms with the question of what we might mean by the curious and inescapableterm "objectivity."We have used a lot of toxic ink and trees processedinto paper decryingwhat theyhave meant and how it hurts us. The imagined"they" constitute a kind of invisible conspiracyof masculinistscientists and philosophers replete with grants and laboratories.The imagined "we"are the embodiedothers, who are not allowed not to have a body, a finite point of view, and so an inevitablydisqualifying and pollutingbias in any discussion of consequence outside our own little circles, where a "mass"-subscriptionjournal might reach a few thousand readerscomposed mostly of science haters. At least, I confess to these paranoidfantasies and academicresentments lurking under- neath some convolutedreflections in print under my name in the feminist literaturein the history and philosophy of science. We, the feministsin the debatesabout science and technology,are the Reagan era's "special-interestgroups" in the rarified realm of epistemology,where traditionallywhat can count as knowledgeis policed by philosopherscodifying cognitive canon law. Of course, a special-interestgroup is, by Reaganoiddefinition, any collective historicalsubject that daresto resistthe stripped-downatomism of Star Wars, hypermarket,postmodern, media-simulatedcitizen- ship. Max Headroomdoesn't have a body; therefore,he alone sees everythingin the greatcommunicator's empire of the GlobalNet- work. No wonder Max gets to have a naive sense of humor and a kind of happily regressive,preoedipal sexuality, a sexuality that FeministStudies 14, no. 3 (Fall 1988).? 1988 by Feminist Studies,Inc. 575 576 Donna Haraway we ambivalently-with dangerousincorrectness - had imaginedto be reserved for lifelong inmates of female and colonized bodies and maybe also white male computer hackers in solitary elec- tronic confinement. It has seemed to me that feminists have both selectively and flexibly used and been trapped by two poles of a tempting dichotomy on the question of objectivity.Certainly I speak for myself here, and I offer the speculationthat there is a collective discourse on these matters. Recent social studies of science and technology,for example,have made availablea very strongsocial constructionistargument for all forms of knowledgeclaims, most certainlyand especiallyscientific ones.' Accordingto these tempt- ing views, no insider'sperspective is privileged,because all draw- ings of inside-outsideboundaries in knowledge are theorizedas power moves, not moves toward truth. So, from the strongsocial constructionistperspective, why should we be cowed by scien- tists'descriptions of their activityand accomplishments;they and their patronshave stakes in throwingsand in our eyes. They tell parablesabout objectivityand scientificmethod to studentsin the first years of their initiation,but no practitionerof the high scien- tific arts would be caught dead actingon the textbook versions. Socialconstructionists make clearthat officialideologies about ob- jectivity and scientificmethod are particularlybad guides to how scientific knowledge is actually made.Just as for the rest of us, what scientistsbelieve or say they do and what they reallydo have a very loose fit. The only people who end up actuallybelieving and, goddessfor- bid, acting on the ideologicaldoctrines of disembodiedscientific objectivity-enshrinedin elementarytextbooks and technoscience boosterliterature-are nonscientists,including a few very trusting philosophers.Of course, my designationof this last groupis prob- ably just a reflection of a residual disciplinarychauvinism ac- quiredfrom identifyingwith historiansof science and from spend- ing too much time with a microscopein early adulthoodin a kind of disciplinarypreoedipal and modernist poetic moment when cells seemed to be cells and organisms,organisms. Pace, Gertrude Stein. But then came the law of the fatherand its resolutionof the problemof objectivity,a problemsolved by always alreadyabsent referents,deferred signifieds, split subjects,and the endless play of signifiers.Who wouldn't grow up warped?Gender, race, the Donna Haraway 577 world itself-all seem the effects of warp speeds in the play of signifiersin a cosmic force field. In any case, social constructionistsmight maintain that the ideologicaldoctrine of scientific method and all the philosophical verbiageabout epistemologywere cooked up to distractour atten- tion from getting to know the world effectivelyby practicingthe sciences.From this point of view, science-the realgame in town - is rhetoric,a series of effortsto persuaderelevant social actors that one'smanufactured knowledge is a routeto a desiredform of very objectivepower. Such persuasionsmust take accountof the struc- ture of facts and artifacts,as well as of language-mediatedactors in the knowledge game. Here, artifacts and facts are parts of the powerful art of rhetoric. Practiceis persuasion,and the focus is very much on practice.All knowledge is a condensed node in an agonistic power field. The strong program in the sociology of knowledgejoins with the lovely and nasty tools of semiologyand deconstructionto insist on the rhetoricalnature of truth,including scientific truth. History is a story Western culture buffs tell each other;science is a contestabletext and a power field;the contentis the form.2Period. So much for those of us who would still like to talk about reality with more confidencethan we allow to the ChristianRight when they discuss the Second Coming and their being rapturedout of the final destructionof the world. We would like to think our ap- peals to real worlds are more than a desperatelurch away from cynicism and an act of faith like any other cult's,no matterhow much space we generouslygive to all the rich and always histori- cally specific mediations through which we and everybody else must know the world. But the further I get in describing the radical social constructionistprogram and a particularversion of postmodernism,coupled with the acid tools of criticaldiscourse in the human sciences, the more nervous I get. The imageryof force fields, of moves in a fully textualizedand coded world, which is the working metaphorin many argumentsabout socially negoti- ated realityfor the postmodernsubject, is, just for starters,an im- agery of high-techmilitary fields, of automatedacademic battle- fields, where blips of light calledplayers disintegrate (what a meta- phor!) each other in order to stay in the knowledge and power game. Technoscienceand science fiction collapse into the sun of their radiant(ir)reality-war.3 It shouldn'ttake decadesof feminist 578 Donna Haraway theoryto sense the enemy here. Nancy Hartsockgot all this crystal clear in her concept of abstractmasculinity.4 I, and others, startedout wanting a strongtool for deconstruct- ing the truth claims of hostile science by showing the radicalhis- toricalspecificity, and so contestability,of everylayer of the onion of scientificand technologicalconstructions, and we end up with a kind of epistemologicalelectroshock therapy, which far from ushering us into the high stakes tables of the game of contesting public truths, lays us out on the table with self-inducedmultiple personalitydisorder. We wanted a way to go beyond showingbias in science (thatproved too easy anyhow) and beyond separating the good scientificsheep from the bad goats of bias and misuse. It seemed promisingto do this by the strongestpossible construc- tionist argumentthat left no cracksfor reducingthe issues to bias versus objectivity, use versus misuse, science versus pseudo- science. We unmasked the doctrinesof objectivitybecause they threatenedour budding sense of collective historicalsubjectivity and agency and our "embodied"accounts of the truth,and we end- ed up with one more excuse for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genesis Cosmology* Genesis Cosmology Is the Cosmology Model in Agreement with the Interpretive Description of the First Three Da
    Genesis Cosmology* Genesis Cosmology is the cosmology model in agreement with the interpretive description of the first three days in Genesis. Genesis Cosmology is derived from the unified theory that unifies various phenomena in our universe. In Genesis, the first day involves the emergence of the separation of light and darkness from the formless, empty, and dark pre-universe, corresponding to the emergence of the current asymmetrical dual universe of the light universe with light and the dark universe without light from the simple and dark pre-universe in Genesis Cosmology. The light universe is the current observable universe, while the dark universe coexisting with the light universe is first separated from the light universe and later connected with the light universe as dark energy. In Genesis, the second day involves the separation of waters from above and below the expanse, corresponding to the separation of dark matter and baryonic matter from above and below the interface between dark matter and baryonic matter for the formation of galaxies in Genesis Cosmology. In Genesis, the third day involves the separation of sea and land where organisms appeared, corresponding to the separation of interstellar medium and star with planet where organisms were developed in Genesis Cosmology. The unified theory for Genesis Cosmology unifies various phenomena in our observable universe and other universes. In terms of cosmology, our universe starts with the 11-dimensional membrane universe followed by the 10-dimensional string universe and then by the 10-dimensional particle universe, and ends with the asymmetrical dual universe with variable dimensional particle and 4-dimensional particles.
    [Show full text]
  • CRITICAL THEORY INSTITUTE University of California, Irvine CTI
    CRITICAL THEORY INSTITUTE University of California, Irvine CTI 2011 Wellek Library Lecture Series Donna Haraway Professor Emerita, History of Consciousness, University of California, Santa Cruz Playing Cat’s Cradle with Companion Species Monday, May 2nd, 5-7pm Tuesday, May 3rd, 5-7pm Thursday, May 5th, 5-7pm Humanities Gateway, 1030 Contact Information: Critical Theory Institute University of California, Irvine 433 Krieger Hall Irvine, CA 92697-5525 Phone (949) 824-5583 Fax (949) 824-2767 Director: Kavita Philip Admin. Coordinator: Lisa Clark [email protected] www.humanities.uci.edu/critical For information concerning accommodations for disabilities, please contact Lisa Clark at 949-824-5583 Donna Haraway: A Bibliography for the Occasion of the 31st Wellek Library Lectures Compiled by John Novak, UCI Research Librarian An electronic version of this and previous Wellek Library Lecture bibliographies with working electronic links will be maintained at this Web site: http://www.lib.uci.edu/about/publications/wellek/wellek-series.html Direct links to electronic materials may be accessed on-campus. Off-campus access is for the UCI community via the VPN. For more information, visit the following Web site: http://www.lib.uci.edu/how/connect-from-off-campus.html Table of Contents for Bibliography Works by Haraway ..................................................... 1 Haraway Interviews and Biographies ....................... 16 Selected Works About or Utilizing Haraway ............. 18 Works by Haraway 1975 "The Transformation of the Left in Science: Radical Associations in Britain in the 30s and the U.S.A. in the 60s." Soundings 58 4 (1975): 441-62. Print. Call Number: Langson Bound Periodicals BV 1460 C6 1976 Crystals, Fabrics, and Fields: Metaphors of Organicism in Twentieth-Century Developmental Biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesis Oct Draft 20.Pdf
    A Manolo y Maruchi 2 Index Acknowledgments …………………………………………………………... 9 Introduction 1. Research topic, objectives and research questions…………………… 11 2. Research motivations…………………………………………………….. 14 3. Methodological strategies ………………………………………………. 15 4. Structure of the thesis…………………………………………………… 17 Chapter 1. Drawing cartographies, building epistemologies 1.1. Introduction…………………………………………………………. 22 1.2. Feminist (in)visible alliances: the importance of methodological bridges between the Humanities and the Social Sciences…………………………………. 24 1.2.1. Writing a scholarly piece in between the Social Sciences and the Humanities………………………………………………………… 25 1.2.2. Conceptual and political benefits of such a methodological bridge… 27 1.3. From post-modernist paradoxes for literary studies to post-humanist and post- colonial contributions: mapping literary theory………………………………….. 28 1.4. Literature and feminism: an overview………………………………………… 33 1.5. Entangling literature, technology and feminism ………..…………………… 37 1.5.1. Cyberfeminism: going political through the social net……………. 39 3 1.5.2. Feminist Science and Technology Studies: How might we theorize bodies as lived and/or as socially situated? ……………………………………….. 41 1.5.3. Third wave feminism: reinforcing dichotomies? …………………….. 43 1.6. New materialism: third wave feminist epistemology…………………………… 45 1.6.1. New materialist conversations: engaging with the critiques. ………. 46 1.6.2. Putting new materialism to work: implications for the relation between Toni Morrison and Facebook. ……………………………………………… 49 1.7. Conclusions………………………………………………………………… 51 Chapter 2. Diffractive methodology: relating gendered fluxes 2.1. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………. 53 2.2. Diffractive methodology……………………………………………………….. 54 2.3. Objective and research questions……………………………………………….. 56 2.4. Selecting the participants ……………………………………………………….. 57 2.4.1. Toni Morrison: performing feminist politics in the information society 58 2.4.2. Social Networking Sites: the case of Facebook………………………… 59 2.4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Dressing in the Master's Clothes
    Book Review Cross-Dressing in the Master's Clothes Kathryn Abrams' Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What To Do About It. By Joan Williams.' New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pp. 338. $30.00. Feminist legal theory has, famously, spotlighted the connection between substance and method.' Epistemological assumptions, forms of reasoning, even nuances of tone, feminists remind us, can help to entrench or disrupt damaging gender rules or norms. Thus, feminist legal work has often nested a substantive critique in a broad challenge to the norms of legal scholarship, legal reasoning, or both. Joan Williams's new book, Unbending Gender,2 exemplifies this approach. She has as much to say about the way that change should be framed, debated, and produced as she does about the particular changes that are required. And her offerings in " Professor of Law, Cornell Law School. I am grateful to Martha Fineman for her very thoughtful comments on a draft of this review, and to Lani Guinier. Bill Kell. and Lee Teitelbaum for conversations on the subject of this review. I am also grateful to the University of Connecticut Law School, whose Gallivan Conference on Real Property provided me with my first introduction to Williams's book, and the Project on Work and Family of the Washington College of Law at American University, whose conference on Hegemonic and Resistant Genderings gave me further opportunity to reflect on these ideas. * Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law. Georgetown University Law Center. 1. Examples of works highlighting this connection abound. In law, see, for example, Kathryn Abrams, Hearing the Call of Stories, 79 CAL.
    [Show full text]
  • Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research
    Objectivity and Diversity Objectivity and Diversity Another Logic of Scientific Research Sandra Harding The University of Chicago Press :: Chicago and London Sandra Harding is Distinguished Professor of Education and Gender Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles, and Distinguished Affiliate Professor of Philosophy at Michigan State University. She is the editor of The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader and the author of Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2015 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2015. Printed in the United States of America 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15â 1 2 3 4 5 ISBN - 13: 978- 0- 226- 24122- 7 (cloth) ISBN - 13: 978- 0- 226- 24136- 4 (paper) ISBN - 13: 978- 0- 226- 24153- 1 (e- book) DOI : 10.7208/chicago/9780226241531.001.0001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Harding, Sandra G., author. Objectivity and diversity : another logic of scientific research / Sandra Harding. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-226-24122-7 (cloth : alk. paper)— ISBN 978-0-226-24136-4 (pbk. : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-0-226-24153-1 (e-book) 1. Science—Philosophy. 2. Objectivity. 3. Science—Social aspects. I. Title Q 175.H 324 2015 507.2—dc23 2014041598 a This paper meets the requirements of ANSI / NISO Z 39.48- 1992 (Permanence of Paper). Contents Acknowledgments vii Preface ix 1 New Citizens, New Societies: New Sciences, New Philosophies? 1 2 Stronger Objectivity for Sciences from Below 26 3 Women, Gender, Development: Maximally Objective Research? 52 4 Do Micronesian Navigators Practice Science? 80 5 Pluralism, Multiplicity, and the Disunity of Sciences 105 6 Must Sciences Be Secular? 127 7 After Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Newtonian Wormholes
    Newtonian wormholes José P. S. Lemos∗ and Paulo Luz† Centro Multidisciplinar de Astrofísica - CENTRA, Departamento de Física, Instituto Superior Técnico - IST, Universidade de Lisboa - UL, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal Abstract A wormhole solution in Newtonian gravitation, enhanced through an equation relating the Ricci scalar to the mass density, is presented. The wormhole inhabits a spherically symmetric curved space, with one throat and two asymptotically flat regions. Particle dynamics in this geometry is studied, and the three distinct dynamical radii, namely, the geodesic, circumferential, and curvature radii, appear naturally in the study of circular motion. Generic motion is also analysed. A limiting case, although inconclusive, suggests the possibility of having a Newtonian black hole in a region of finite (nonzero) size. arXiv:1409.3231v1 [gr-qc] 10 Sep 2014 ∗ [email protected] † [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION When many alternative theories to general relativity are being suggested, and the grav- itational field is being theoretically and experimentally put to test, it is interesting to try an alternative to Newton’s gravitation through an unexpected but simple modification of it. The idea is to have Newtonian gravitation, not in flat space, as we are used to, but in curved space. This intriguing possibility has been suggested by Abramowicz [1]. It was noted that Newtonian gravitation in curved space, and the corresponding Newtonian dy- namics in a circle, distinguishes three radii, namely, the geodesic radius (which gives the distance from the center to its perimeter), the circumferential radius (which is given by the perimeter divided by 2π), and the curvature radius (which is Frenet’s radius of curvature of a curve, in this case a circle).
    [Show full text]
  • Amitav Ghosh – Thursday 11.30 – 13.00 Auditori
    ABSTRACTS IN ORDER OF INTERVENTION Panel 1: Amitav Ghosh – Thursday 11.30 – 13.00 Auditori Routes Beyond Roots: Alternative Ecological Histories in Amitav Ghosh's Sea of Poppies Maria-Sabina Draga, University of Bucharest This paper will attempt to read Amitav Ghosh's novel Sea of Poppies as an account of “world histories from below” (to use Antoinette Burton's term, 2012) and take the debate further through positioning the idea of writing alternative histories of the colonial times within an ecocritical context. While the need for such rewritings has always been a central preoccupation of postcolonial literature, the recent tendency (shared by Ghosh) has been to look at history from increasingly local, individualised perspectives. I will examine Ghosh's tracing of routes and connectivities across the Indian Ocean at the time immediately preceding the opium wars, focusing on the consequent reconsideration of human relationships and hierarchies in a post-human perspective. This perspective cuts across boundaries established by caste, social class, biology and geography, as well as by the colonial system, which Ghosh has long been interested in reimagining. While on board the Ibis identities become deterritorialised and fluid, they are disconnected from their various roots and paths established by rigid culturally conditioned frameworks. Connections are established between the human and other forms of life, forming a continuum across the trade routes of the Indian Ocean, which becomes a fluid space of rebuilding identities. I will position my discussion within a theoretical framework informed by Bruno Latour's concept of a politics of nature, Donna Haraway's nature-culture negotiations and Sangeeta Ray's studies of ecological intimacies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2019 A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry Karina Bucciarelli Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses Part of the Epistemology Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Bucciarelli, Karina, "A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry" (2019). Scripps Senior Theses. 1365. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/1365 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK: PREVENTING KNOWLEDGE DISTORTIONS IN SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY by KARINA MARTINS BUCCIARELLI SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR SUSAN CASTAGNETTO PROFESSOR RIMA BASU APRIL 26, 2019 Bucciarelli 2 Acknowledgements First off, I would like to thank my wonderful family for supporting me every step of the way. Mamãe e Papai, obrigada pelo amor e carinho, mil telefonemas, conversas e risadas. Obrigada por não só proporcionar essa educação incrível, mas também me dar um exemplo de como viver. Rafa, thanks for the jokes, the editing help and the spontaneous phone calls. Bela, thank you for the endless time you give to me, for your patience and for your support (even through WhatsApp audios). To my dear friends, thank you for the late study nights, the wild dance parties, the laughs and the endless support.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Gender Studies / Queer Theory
    1 Women and Gender Studies / Queer Theory Please choose at least 60 to 67 texts from across the fields presented. Students are expected to familiarize themselves with major works throughout this field, balancing their particular interests with the need to prepare themselves broadly in the topic. First Wave Feminism 1. Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Women (1792) 2. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, “Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions” (1848) 3. Harriet Taylor, “Enfranchisement of Women” (1851) 4. Sojourner Truth, “Ain’t I a Woman?” (1851) 5. John Stuart Mill, The Subjection of Women (1869) 6. Susan B. Anthony, Speech after Arrest for Illegal Voting (1872) 7. Anna Julia Cooper, A Voice From the South (1892) 8. Charlotte Perkins, Women and Economics (1898) 9. Emma Goldman, The Traffic in Women and Other Essays on Feminism (1917) 10. Nancy Cott, The Grounding of Modern Feminism (1987) 11. Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own (1929) 12. Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex (1953) Second Wave Feminism 13. Betty Friedan, The Feminine Mystique (1963) 14. Kate Millet, Sexual Politics (1969) 15. Phyllis Chesler, Women and Madness (1970) 16. Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (1970) 17. Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch (1970) 18. Brownmiller, Susan, Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape (1975) 19. Adrienne Rich, Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution (1976) 20. Mary Daly, Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism (1978) 21. 22. Alice Echols, Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America 1967-75 (1989) Third Wave Feminism 23. Leslie Heywood and Jennifer Drake, eds., Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism (1997) 24.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feminism and Foucault Debate: Stakes, Issues, Positions
    Chapter 1 THE FEMINISM AND FOUCAULT DEBATE: STAKES, ISSUES, POSITIONS eminists disagree about the usefulness of Foucault’s work for feminist theory and practice. Some feminists advocate a Foucauldian feminism, while others Fargue that the underlying assumptions of feminism are antithetical to Fou- cault’s theoretical framework.1 The question about whether or not Foucault’s work is useful for feminism is situated within the larger debate about the com- patibility of a postmodern approach with an emancipatory, progressive politics.2 Proponents of postmodernism see it as essential to a progressive politics. They claim that traditional notions of political unity, rights, and freedom carry norma- tive implications that foreclose certain questions about who is included in the po- litical process and that this foreclosure may result in systematic exclusion. Proponents of progressive politics, on the other hand, claim that postmodernism undermines the very possibility of a progressive, emancipatory politics mainly be- cause of its rejection of normative concepts.3 In an article entitled, “Why Post- structuralism is a Dead End for Progressive Thought,” Barbara Epstein claims, “the underlying assumptions of poststructuralism conflict with the assumptions that are necessary for radical politics.”4 Epstein is particularly concerned with feminist poststructuralism, which she claims is amoral and “is a campaign against the basic structures of thought and language.”5 She is not alone in her condem- nation of poststructuralism. Many feminists share her
    [Show full text]
  • A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist
    Donna Haraway, "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist- Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century," in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York; Routledge, 1991), pp.149-181. AN IRONIC DREAM OF A COMMON LANGUAGE FOR WOMEN IN THE INTEGRATED CIRCUIT This chapter is an effort to build an ironic political myth faithful to feminism, socialism, and materialism. Perhaps more faithful as blasphemy is faithful, than as reverent worship and identification. Blasphemy has always seemed to require taking things very seriously. I know no better stance to adopt from within the secular-religious, evangelical traditions of United States politics, including the politics of socialist feminism. Blasphemy protects one from the moral majority within, while still insisting on the need for community. Blasphemy is not apostasy. Irony is about contradictions that do not resolve into larger wholes, even dialectically, about the tension of holding incompatible things together because both or all are necessary and true. Irony is about humour and serious play. It is also a rhetorical strategy and a political method, one I would like to see more honoured within socialist-feminism. At the centre of my ironic faith, my blasphemy, is the image of the cyborg. A cyborg is a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature of fiction. Social reality is lived social relations, our most important political construction, a world-changing fiction. The international women's movements have constructed 'women's experience', as well as uncovered or discovered this crucial collective object. This experience is a fiction and fact of the most crucial, political kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter (PDF)
    ACKNOWL EDGMENTS This book began many years ago when Lisa Yoneyama invited me to consider the issue of “comfort women” for a session that she or ga nized for the annual meeting of the American Studies Association. I had been very ambivalent and even a little skeptical about the passionate investment in the issue and the consequent will to represent this history on the part of Korean/American art- ists, writers, and scholars, myself included. That session pushed me to unpack and articulate the contours of my unease and, more consequentially, brought me together with Lisa and Kandice Chuh for what has turned out to be a most generative, sustaining friendship and intellectual exchange in the many years since. This book would not exist without their steadfast support and much- needed interventions. Their scholarly brilliance and critical grace continue to inspire me to try harder. From my first book to this book, Lisa Lowe has provided me with a singular model of broad intellectual engagement and deep thinking. I would like to thank the friends who have sustained me by sharing the joys of good food, wine, music, and laughter in SoCal: Brian Albert, Eve Oishi, Sheri Ozeki, Cindy Cheng, Rachel Park, Jenny Terry, Surina Khan, Catherine Sameh, Lucy Burns, Anjali Arondekar, Christine Balance, Patty Ahn, Arlene Keizer, Alex Juhasz, Rachel Lee, Gabe Spera, David Wong Louie, Jackie Louie, Juliet Williams, Ali Behdad, Kathleen McHugh, Yong Soon Min, David Lloyd, Sarita See, and Karen Tongson. Brian, Eve, Cindy, and Lucy took very good care of me when I needed it most.
    [Show full text]