DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecofeminist Explorations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1990 Ecofeminist explorations Janet Henderson The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Henderson, Janet, "Ecofeminist explorations" (1990). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5360. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5360 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mike and Maureen MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. , COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author’s written consent. University of MOTfisumc ECOFEMINIST EXPLORATIONS B y Janet Henderson B. A., Furman University, 1985 Presented in partial fulfillm ent of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1990 Approved by Chair, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School UMI Number: EP40824 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these-will be-noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI EP40824 Published by ProQuest LLC (2014). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 AN ECOFEMINIST CRITIQUE OF M A R X In the writings of Karl Marx one can find apparent inconsis­ tencies in his thoughts on the human relationship to nature and on utopian thinking. It seems that these two areas of Marx's thought are closely related, as are the reasons for the inconsistencies in his ideas about them. On the one hand, some of Marx's writings indicate that humans are part of nature, not separate from it, and that the relationship between human and nonhuman nature is a reciprocal one. In other writings, that ideal relationship is replaced by one of human "mastery" over nature, wherein nature is merely a resource to be used by humans. Regarding utopian thinking, at times Marx is visionary in his writing and paints pictures of an ideal communist society as he would like to see it. These images are v e ry utopian, bu t pervading m uch of his w ork is a harsh critique of and warning against utopian thought. How is one to make sense of the inconsistent ideas expressed by Marx on these two subjects? Perhaps the body of thought called eco- feminisml can be helpful in answering this question since it is deeply concerned with the human/nature relationship and with the notion of utopia. In his earlier writings, most particularly the "Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844," Marx developed a theory of the relationship between human and nonhuman nature which claimed that the two are not as distinct as we normally think them to be. He went so far as to call the whole of nature "the inorganic body of man," meaning that it sustains humanity both physically and intellectually and that humans must maintain a constant interchange w ith it as a condition of their existence. (McLellan 1984, 81). Within this theory, nature is not an abstract entity, removed from and dominated by human beings, but rather a source of life for them, a realm which is continuous with their own human realm. It follows from this conception of the human/nonhuman nature relationship that humans would have some sort of respect for nature, that they would not dominate and exploit it. Even if acting only out of self-interest, humans would not likely exploit nature, because they would be harming their own inorganic body by doing so. This early notion of the human relationship to nature is not maintained throughout Marx's work; in fact it is inconsistent with his guiding theory of historical materialism in which progress (and therefore human liberation and self-realization) takes place only when the natural world is subjected to the mastery of human labourers. This deterministic view of history does not allow for humans to exist in a reciprocal relationship with nonhuman nature. It is necessary, according to this view, that nature come to be seen as an object to be possessed and used under capitalism, which is also a necessary stage in the unfolding of the history of struggle which finally leads to the liberation of the working class. As Marx describes this aspect of the capitalist stage: Nature becomes for the first time simply an object for mankind, purely a matter of utility; it ceases to be recognized as a power in its own right; and the theoretical knowledge of its inde­ pendent laws appears only as a stratagem de­ signed to subdue it to human requirements, whether as the object of consumption or as the means of production (363-4). Marx goes on to say that this change is "permanently revolution­ ary, tearing down all obstacles that impede . the exploitation and exchange of natural and intellectual forces" (364). In other words, the exploitation of nature goes hand in hand with the development of the forces of production under capitalism. The development of these forces and of capitalism itself is, for Marx, a prerequisite to a communist society; it is that which makes communism possible and inevitable. The basis of M arx’s theory of communism is that it grows out of capitalism. This deterministic view of history justifies the domination and 4 exploitation of nature by humans by pointing out that it is inevitable (and essential for human freedom). The advancement of technology (apparently without regard for its adverse effects on the earth) is hailed as the key to the liberation of humans from slavery, serfdom, and the drudgery of labour and as that which brings about progress in human relationships. It can be concluded from this idea that the domination of nature is necessary for the liberation of humans. Humans are seen in a very different relationship to nature than they are in the mutual one described earlier. Humans are distinct, apart from nonhuman nature; they are in a position of dominance over it, and it is theirs to do with as they wall. It is a tool that they must manipulate in order to attain their freedom. With modern (industrial) technology understood as the paradigmatic relationship of domination between human and non­ human nature, a closer examination of Marx's statements about its role in human liberation clarifies the underlying assumption about the human/nature relationship. In the C o m m u n is t M a n ife s to Marx , explains w hy technology is an essential part of the fall of capitalism and the subsequent liberation of the working class: 5 The essential condition for the existence, and for the sw ay of the bourgeosie class, is the formation and augmentation of capital; the condition for capital is wage-labour. Wage labour rests exclusively on competition between the labourers. The advance of industry, whose involuntary promoter is the bourgeoisie, replaces the isolation of the labourers, due to competition, by their revolutionary combination, due to association. The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeosie produces and appropriates products. What the bour­ geosie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable (230-1). The way in which the advance of industry replaces the isolation of the labourers "by their revolutionary combination, due to associ­ ation," is by allowing isolated workers from different places to have contact w ith one another through improved means of communi­ cation and transportation. In this way they are able to form a national union and then a revolutionary movement (228). Another way technology frees humans is through reducing the necessary labour time of society to a minimum. "The counter­ part of this reduction is that all members of society can develop their education in the arts, sciences, etc., thanks to the free time and means available to all" (380). Marx takes the liberating notion of technology the farthest in the Grundrisse, when he speaks of it as the realization of human nature. This idea undoubtedly comes from his basic claim that humans are prim arily producers (homo faber) Of machines, locomotives, railways, electric telegraphs, etc., he says, "These are products of human industry; natural material transformed into organs of the human will to dominate nature or to realize itself therein" (381). Marx makes a direct connection between the realization of the human will and the domination of nature in this passage, as he does between the development of the hum an as social being and the mastery of nature in the following passage on the changes technology brings to the workplace (more specifically the replacement of labourer by machine). In this transformation, what appears as the mainstay of production and wealth is neither the immediate labour performed by the worker, nor the time that he works - but the appro­ priation by man of his own general productive force, his understanding of nature and the mastery of it; in a word, the development of the social individual (380).
Recommended publications
  • Cross-Dressing in the Master's Clothes

    Cross-Dressing in the Master's Clothes

    Book Review Cross-Dressing in the Master's Clothes Kathryn Abrams' Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What To Do About It. By Joan Williams.' New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pp. 338. $30.00. Feminist legal theory has, famously, spotlighted the connection between substance and method.' Epistemological assumptions, forms of reasoning, even nuances of tone, feminists remind us, can help to entrench or disrupt damaging gender rules or norms. Thus, feminist legal work has often nested a substantive critique in a broad challenge to the norms of legal scholarship, legal reasoning, or both. Joan Williams's new book, Unbending Gender,2 exemplifies this approach. She has as much to say about the way that change should be framed, debated, and produced as she does about the particular changes that are required. And her offerings in " Professor of Law, Cornell Law School. I am grateful to Martha Fineman for her very thoughtful comments on a draft of this review, and to Lani Guinier. Bill Kell. and Lee Teitelbaum for conversations on the subject of this review. I am also grateful to the University of Connecticut Law School, whose Gallivan Conference on Real Property provided me with my first introduction to Williams's book, and the Project on Work and Family of the Washington College of Law at American University, whose conference on Hegemonic and Resistant Genderings gave me further opportunity to reflect on these ideas. * Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law. Georgetown University Law Center. 1. Examples of works highlighting this connection abound. In law, see, for example, Kathryn Abrams, Hearing the Call of Stories, 79 CAL.
  • Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research

    Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research

    Objectivity and Diversity Objectivity and Diversity Another Logic of Scientific Research Sandra Harding The University of Chicago Press :: Chicago and London Sandra Harding is Distinguished Professor of Education and Gender Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles, and Distinguished Affiliate Professor of Philosophy at Michigan State University. She is the editor of The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader and the author of Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2015 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2015. Printed in the United States of America 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15â 1 2 3 4 5 ISBN - 13: 978- 0- 226- 24122- 7 (cloth) ISBN - 13: 978- 0- 226- 24136- 4 (paper) ISBN - 13: 978- 0- 226- 24153- 1 (e- book) DOI : 10.7208/chicago/9780226241531.001.0001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Harding, Sandra G., author. Objectivity and diversity : another logic of scientific research / Sandra Harding. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-226-24122-7 (cloth : alk. paper)— ISBN 978-0-226-24136-4 (pbk. : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-0-226-24153-1 (e-book) 1. Science—Philosophy. 2. Objectivity. 3. Science—Social aspects. I. Title Q 175.H 324 2015 507.2—dc23 2014041598 a This paper meets the requirements of ANSI / NISO Z 39.48- 1992 (Permanence of Paper). Contents Acknowledgments vii Preface ix 1 New Citizens, New Societies: New Sciences, New Philosophies? 1 2 Stronger Objectivity for Sciences from Below 26 3 Women, Gender, Development: Maximally Objective Research? 52 4 Do Micronesian Navigators Practice Science? 80 5 Pluralism, Multiplicity, and the Disunity of Sciences 105 6 Must Sciences Be Secular? 127 7 After Mr.
  • A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry

    A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry

    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2019 A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry Karina Bucciarelli Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses Part of the Epistemology Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Bucciarelli, Karina, "A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry" (2019). Scripps Senior Theses. 1365. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/1365 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK: PREVENTING KNOWLEDGE DISTORTIONS IN SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY by KARINA MARTINS BUCCIARELLI SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR SUSAN CASTAGNETTO PROFESSOR RIMA BASU APRIL 26, 2019 Bucciarelli 2 Acknowledgements First off, I would like to thank my wonderful family for supporting me every step of the way. Mamãe e Papai, obrigada pelo amor e carinho, mil telefonemas, conversas e risadas. Obrigada por não só proporcionar essa educação incrível, mas também me dar um exemplo de como viver. Rafa, thanks for the jokes, the editing help and the spontaneous phone calls. Bela, thank you for the endless time you give to me, for your patience and for your support (even through WhatsApp audios). To my dear friends, thank you for the late study nights, the wild dance parties, the laughs and the endless support.
  • Contemporary Anarchist Studies

    Contemporary Anarchist Studies

    Contemporary Anarchist Studies This volume of collected essays by some of the most prominent academics studying anarchism bridges the gap between anarchist activism on the streets and anarchist theory in the academy. Focusing on anarchist theory, pedagogy, methodologies, praxis, and the future, this edition will strike a chord for anyone interested in radical social change. This interdisciplinary work highlights connections between anarchism and other perspectives such as feminism, queer theory, critical race theory, disability studies, post- modernism and post-structuralism, animal liberation, and environmental justice. Featuring original articles, this volume brings together a wide variety of anarchist voices whilst stressing anarchism’s tradition of dissent. This book is a must buy for the critical teacher, student, and activist interested in the state of the art of anarchism studies. Randall Amster, J.D., Ph.D., professor of Peace Studies at Prescott College, publishes widely in areas including anarchism, ecology, and social movements, and is the author of Lost in Space: The Criminalization, Globalization , and Urban Ecology of Homelessness (LFB Scholarly, 2008). Abraham DeLeon, Ph.D., is an assistant professor at the University of Rochester in the Margaret Warner Graduate School of Education and Human Development. His areas of interest include critical theory, anarchism, social studies education, critical pedagogy, and cultural studies. Luis A. Fernandez is the author of Policing Dissent: Social Control and the Anti- Globalization Movement (Rutgers University Press, 2008). His interests include protest policing, social movements, and the social control of late modernity. He is a professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Northern Arizona University. Anthony J. Nocella, II, is a doctoral student at Syracuse University and a professor at Le Moyne College.
  • The Foundation of Feminist Research and Its Distinction from Traditional Research Joanne Ardovini-Brooker, Ph.D

    The Foundation of Feminist Research and Its Distinction from Traditional Research Joanne Ardovini-Brooker, Ph.D

    Home | Business|Career | Workplace | Community | Money | International Advancing Women In Leadership Feminist Epistemology: The Foundation of Feminist Research and its Distinction from Traditional Research Joanne Ardovini-Brooker, Ph.D. ARDOVINI-BROOKER, SPRING, 2002 ...feminist epistemologies are the golden keys that unlock the door to feminist research. Once the door is unlocked, a better understanding of the distinctive nature of feminist research can occur. There are many questions surrounding feminist research. The most common question is: “What makes feminist research distinctive from traditional research within the Social Sciences?” In trying to answer this question, we need to examine feminist epistemology and the intertwining nature of epistemology, methodology (theory and analysis of how research should proceed), and methods (techniques for gathering data) utilized by feminist researchers. Feminist epistemology in contrast to traditional epistemologies is the foundation on which feminist methodology is built. In turn, the research that develops from this methodology differs greatly from research that develops from traditional methodology and epistemology. Therefore, I argue that one must have a general understanding of feminist epistemology and methodology before one can understand what makes this type of research unique. Such a foundation will assist us in our exploration of the realm of feminist research, while illuminating the differences between feminist and traditional research. An Introduction to Feminist Epistemology Epistemology is the study of knowledge and how it is that people come to know what they know (Johnson, 1995, p. 97). Originating from philosophy, epistemology comes to us from a number of disciplines, i.e.: sociology, psychology, political science, education, and women’s studies (Duran, 1991, p.
  • The Practical Turn' David G

    The Practical Turn' David G

    8 The Practical Turn' David G. Stern What is Practice Theory? What is a Practice? What is "practice theory"? The best short answer is that it is any theory that treats practice as a fundamental category, or takes practices as its point of departure . Naturally, this answer leads to further questions . What is meant by "practices" here? What is involved in taking practices as a point of departure or a fundamental category, and what does that commitment amount to? And what is the point of the contrast between a practice-based theory and one that starts elsewhere? Perhaps the most significant point of agreement among those who have taken the practical turn is that it offers a way out of Procustean yet seemingly inescap- able categories, such as subject and object, representation and represented, con- ceptual scheme and content, belief and desire, structure and action, rules and their application, micro and macro, individual and totality . Instead, practice the- orists propose that we start with practices and rethink our theories from the ground up. Bourdieu, for instance, insists that only a theory of practice can open up a way forward : Objective analysis of practical apprehension of the familiar world . teaches us that we shall escape from the ritual either/or choice between objectivism and subjectiv- ism in which the social sciences have so far allowed themselves to be trapped only if we are prepared to inquire into the mode of production and functioning of the practical mastery which makes possible both an objectively intelligible practice and also an objectively enchanted experience of that practice .
  • Political Ecology and Degrowth in Fourth International Conference on Degrowth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity, Leipzig, 2014

    Political Ecology and Degrowth in Fourth International Conference on Degrowth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity, Leipzig, 2014

    Political Ecology and Degrowth in Fourth International Conference on Degrowth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity, Leipzig, 2014. Michalis Theodoropoulos, MSc. Marine and Coastal Management Abstract Degrowth lays at the foundation of Political Ecology and provides a radical political discourse that differentiates Political Ecology from the Left. Degrowth is like a consciousness mirror for Political Ecology as it reflects the theoretical (grass)roots of the ecological movement and provide a new impetus in order for ecology to regain some of its missing glamor and determined political activism. This paper argues that Political Ecology and Degrowth are a strategic way forward to address the challenges of the current multifaceted crisis and to provide a blue-print for future sustainability and survival of the species detached from the imaginary of growth. Keywords: Political Ecology; Degrowth; Crisis Exit Strategy; Green movement Narrative Step: Facing the current crisis “If we do not dare the impossible, we shall be faced with the unthinkable” The ecology of freedom, Murray Bookchin Degrowth is the backbone of political ecology and political ecology is at the core of degrowth. Political Ecology was born, as a movement and at academic level, already by the 1960s but expanded mainly during the 1970s, through a holistic critique on growth, productivism and consumerism, in relation to the carrying capacity (natural limits) of the planet, as well as, in relation to the environmental crisis which had already begun to emerge. Matters such as pollution and water quality, nuclear energy, desertification and protection of biodiversity, chemical agriculture and the effects on human health, living conditions in the cities and overpopulation, began to enter public debate.
  • 'Either Care Or Rights' Won't Do: Moving Beyond the Rights-Care Split

    'Either Care Or Rights' Won't Do: Moving Beyond the Rights-Care Split

    ‘Either Care or Rights’ won’t do: Moving Beyond the Rights-Care Split Keywords: ethics of care, ethics of justice, rights, citizenship. March 2015. ABSTRACT This article contributes to the literature that sees no necessary disjunctions, or inevitable contradictions, between a feminist ethics of care and an ethics of justice in International Relations (IR) – the latter associated with rights, and mostly equated with masculinist norms. In order to do so, it will firstly advocate the need for enhanced ‘care’ components in rights language, and thereby illustrate which transformative elements and normative framework the ethics of care privileges when it comes to rights. Further, in an effort to scrutinize what the ethics of care finds problematic with a liberal (and cosmopolitan) revision of rights, Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach will be examined from a care perspective. To another extent, the article will emphasize that care ethics should be more mindful of the importance of rights for its moral orientation as well as for people who care – increasingly women from the developing world moving from the global South to the global North – and, thereby, advocate citizenship rights that value and embed care. Indeed, this article will call for adjustments along the lines of care and justice constitutive of a moral shift that reinforces the under-scrutinized links between them. Overall, it will attempt to break down the binary oppositions between care and justice, which is deemed detrimental to the thickness of morality. INTRODUCTION The ‘ethics of care’ and the ‘ethics of rights’ have been mainly juxtaposed as starkly opposed moral orientations in IR.
  • A Discussion with Sandra Harding About the History of Interactions, Interdisciplinary Scholarship, and Her New Book

    A Discussion with Sandra Harding About the History of Interactions, Interdisciplinary Scholarship, and Her New Book

    Critical Thinking as an Everyday Practice: A Discussion with Sandra Harding about the History of InterActions, Interdisciplinary Scholarship, and Her New Book Introduction Sandra Harding is a feminist philosopher of science who specializes in epistemology, postcolonial theory, and research methodology. In 1996, she came to the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) to direct the Center for the Study of Women and teach in the Graduate School of Education and Information Studies (GSE&IS). With appointments in the departments of Education and Gender Studies, Professor Harding frequently teaches courses in postcolonial science and technology studies, and feminist theory and social research. Most well known for her work in the development of feminist standpoint theory, Dr. Harding’s scholarship has influenced the fields of science and technology studies, postcolonial studies, information science, education, gender studies, and philosophy. Sandra Harding is also a public intellectual. She has consulted with several international organizations, including the United Nations Commission on Science and Technology for Development, the United Nations Development Fund for Women, and the Pan-American Health Organization regarding women’s issues and science in postcolonial contexts. On January 9, 2013, InterActions (IA) editors sat down with Professor Harding for an interview to discuss the history of InterActions under her guidance, the significance of interdisciplinary and critical scholarship, and the content of her new book, Objectivity and Diversity. Dr. Harding’s influence continues to be an indelible part of IA’s directives and publishing orientation. The editors wanted to ask her about the progression of the journal and her perspectives on the main foci of its mission: interdisciplinarity, critical perspectives, social justice, and the development of early career scholars.
  • Phd Thesis Jayne Glover FINAL SUBMISSION

    Phd Thesis Jayne Glover FINAL SUBMISSION

    “A COMPLEX AND DELICATE WEB”: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SELECTED SPECULATIVE NOVELS BY MARGARET ATWOOD, URSULA K. LE GUIN, DORIS LESSING AND MARGE PIERCY Thesis Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Rhodes University By Jayne Ashleigh Glover December 2007 Abstract This thesis examines selected speculative novels by Margaret Atwood, Ursula K. Le Guin, Doris Lessing and Marge Piercy. It argues that a specifiable ecological ethic can be traced in their work – an ethic which is explored by them through the tensions between utopian and dystopian discourses. The first part of the thesis begins by theorising the concept of an ecological ethic of respect for the Other through current ecological philosophies, such as those developed by Val Plumwood. Thereafter, it contextualises the novels within the broader field of science fiction, and speculative fiction in particular, arguing that the shift from a critical utopian to a critical dystopian style evinces their changing treatment of this ecological ethic within their work. The remainder of the thesis is divided into two parts, each providing close readings of chosen novels in the light of this argument. Part Two provides a reading of Le Guin’s early Hainish novels, The Left Hand of Darkness , The Word for World is Forest and The Dispossessed , followed by an examination of Piercy’s Woman on the Edge of Time , Lessing’s The Marriages Between Zones Three, Four and Five , and Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale . The third, and final, part of the thesis consists of individual chapters analysing the later speculative novels of each author.
  • Situated Knowledges: the Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective Author(S): Donna Haraway Source: Feminist Studies, Vol

    Situated Knowledges: the Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective Author(S): Donna Haraway Source: Feminist Studies, Vol

    Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective Author(s): Donna Haraway Source: Feminist Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Autumn, 1988), pp. 575-599 Published by: Feminist Studies, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3178066 Accessed: 17/04/2009 15:40 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=femstudies. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Feminist Studies, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Feminist Studies. http://www.jstor.org SITUATEDKNOWLEDGES: THE SCIENCEQUESTION IN FEMINISM AND THE PRIVILEGEOF PARTIAL PERSPECTIVE DONNA HARAWAY Academic and activist feminist inquiry has repeatedly tried to come to terms with the question of what we might mean by the curious and inescapableterm "objectivity."We have used a lot of toxic ink and trees processedinto paper decryingwhat theyhave meant and how it hurts us.
  • On the Place of Feminist Epistemology in Philosophy of Education

    On the Place of Feminist Epistemology in Philosophy of Education

    education sciences Article Knowledge for a Common World? On the Place of Feminist Epistemology in Philosophy of Education Claudia Schumann Department of Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm S-106 91, Sweden; [email protected]; Tel.: +46-816-2000 Academic Editor: Andrew Stables Received: 7 January 2016; Accepted: 3 March 2016; Published: 9 March 2016 Abstract: The paper discusses the place of feminist epistemology in philosophy of education. Against frequently raised criticisms, the paper argues that the issues raised by feminist standpoint theory lead neither to a reduction of questions of knowledge to questions of power or politics nor to the endorsement of relativism. Within the on-going discussion in feminist epistemology, we can find lines of argument which provide the grounds for a far more radical critique of the traditional, narrow notion of objectivity, revealing it as inherently flawed and inconsistent and allowing for the defense of a re-worked, broader, more accurate understanding of objectivity. This is also in the interest of developing a strong basis for a feminist critique of problematically biased and repressive epistemological practices which can further be extended to shed light on the way in which knowledge has become distorted through the repression of other non-dominant epistemic standpoints. Thus, requiring a thorough re-thinking of our conceptions of objectivity and rationality, feminist epistemologies need to be carefully considered in order to improve our understanding of what knowledge for a common world implies in the pluralistic and diverse societies of post-traditional modernity in the 21st century. Keywords: feminist epistemology; situated knowledge; objectivity; relativism 1.