<<

Exploring the Colonial History of New Through Artifacts

Ramón A. Gutiérrez

What relationship does a painting of Saint Anthony of Padua on an elk-skin hide have to an iron spur? On the surface, probably little conjoins them other that they were both produced by artisans in the Kingdom of during the eighteenth century. Archaeologists often refer to such material objects as “dumb traces,” not because they are stupid or irrelevant in any way, but because they are mute and silent and do not readily yield their meanings or their grander cultural significance without some prodding and pondering on our part. Such artifacts require interpretation.1 For that, one must first contextualize these objects within denser webs of history, within networks and assemblages of the things humans once made. The broader historical and cultural milieu that led to the creation of this hide painting of Saint Anthony and of the iron spur begins with the Spanish conquest of America, initiated by the 1492 voyage of , which ultimately led to the vanquishment of throughout the New World. ’s overseas empire in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries extended north from what is now Chile as far as New Mexico and , and from Cuba westward to the .

45 The geographer Alfred B. Crosby called the cultural processes unleashed by this colonization the “Columbian exchange,” a set of reciprocal transfers of ideas, technologies and goods that created an infinite array of blendings and bor- rowings, of mixings and meldings, of inventions and wholesale appropriations that were often unique and specific to time and place.2 The New Mexican religious im- age of Saint Anthony of Padua holding the infant Christ was painted with local pigments on an elk-skin hide in 1725, possibly by an indigenous artisan (Figure 1). For almost a century it adorned the mission church at Santo Domingo , a town of indigenous sedentary agriculturalists located some twenty miles south of Santa Fe. There, the town’s residents venerated this image, along with that of

Figure 1. Painting on elk hide of Saint Anthony of Padua with Christ Child, used in the Santo Domingo Mission Church, New Mexico, possibly produced by a Native American neophyte artist around 1725. Franciscan friars set up missions in New Mexico to convert Native to the Catholic faith. The missions used local resources and materials, like this elk hide in place of canvas, in their proselytizing efforts. National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution, gift of Dr. J. Walter Fewkes.

46 Gutiérrez Saint Dominic, the town’s patron saint, as well as many other images of Christ, the Virgin Mary, and angels and saints that still adorn the church’s sanctuary. The iron spur was cast in the late seventeenth or early eighteenth century in New Mexico (Figure 2). Spurs then, as now, were used to prod horses to move in the direction and at the speed their riders commanded. Horses were of strategic importance to the sixteenth-century conquests of the Aztec and Inca empires, to the seventeenth-century conquest of the Kingdom of New Mexico, to the Pueblo Indians’ victory during their 1680 revolt against Spanish rule, and to the terror and pillage the equestrian and inflicted on the kingdom’s residents in the eighteenth century. Spain’s explicit goal in the conquest of the Americas was the Christianiza- tion of its newly acquired indigenous subjects, bringing the sweet words of the Gospel and the message of eternal salvation to persons they saw as living in the darkness of the devil. Never far from this ambition was the equally mesmerizing dream of gold that animated Spanish soldiers. Having traveled to the Americas mostly at their own expense, they were intent on profiting from their invest- ments. For this they needed indigenous labor, which technically belonged to the Crown. Mexico’s first , Don Luis Velasco, succinctly explained the situa- tion in 1608 when he wrote, “no one comes to the Indies to plow and to sow, but only to eat and loaf.”3 For such leisure and lordship to become reality, Spaniards had to maximally exploit their indigenous charges even if it meant working them to death. Christianizing the natives and permitting the settlers’ personal enrich- ment were thus always in tension as contradictory imperial goals, pitting clergy against colonists, and together contesting the power of local Crown officials over the distribution of resources produced by indigenous hands. Would the labor of America’s natives be put to construct magnificent churches and to tending

Figure 2. Iron spur, likely of Spanish manufacture and used by Pueblo Indians, produced in the seventeenth or early eighteenth century. Horses and other large beasts of burden were unknown to Native American peoples before European contact. The Pueblo adopted a horse culture from the Spanish, and subsequently used equestrian warfare to successfully expel the Spanish from Pueblo land in a 1680 revolt. National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution.

Exploring the Colonial 47 church flocks and crops? Or would it be used creating the wealth and leisure the sought? In the Kingdom of New Mexico this debate was particu- larly shrill and intense in the seventeenth century, creating the conditions that led the Pueblo Indians to rebel violently in 1680, producing the first successful overthrow of Spanish rule in the Americas. The Kingdom of New Mexico was initially explored on a grand scale in 1540 by Francisco Vásquez de Coronado, but was quickly abandoned as poor in min- erals and too costly to settle. When rich veins of silver and gold were discovered in north central Mexico in 1552, in what are now the states of Zacatecas and Gua- najuato, Crown resources were channeled to the extraction of this wealth. Sev- eral decades passed before the Crown’s gaze returned to New Mexico, now at the behest of the Franciscan friars eager to Christianize the souls there. King Philip II’s conscience was apparently stirred by these Franciscan pleas and in 1598 he dispatched them with a small group of solider-settlers. While the friars sought to Christianize the , the goal of Philip’s ministers was to Hispanicize them, to transform them into productive workers, creating the supply chains neces- sary to provision the mines with food, hides and tallow, cotton and wool cloth, and ceramic vessels. Indeed, to this day Pueblo Indian rugs, blankets, and pot- tery remain the hallmarks of their craft—sophistication first mastered to satisfy Spanish commercial needs in the seventeenth century. The image of Saint Anthony of Padua holding the infant Christ on one arm, often with a book of sermons nearby, was but one of the many religious objects the Franciscans took to New Mexico to adorn the mission churches they built. Its function was purely didactic: to teach neophytes through the exemplary lives of the saints the various models of virtuous living and paths to Christian salva- tion they could emulate. Saint Francis of Assisi started the Franciscan Order in 1209. Saint Anthony joined him in 1220. It is said that he sought membership in the order because he was very deeply moved by seeing the headless bodies of five Franciscans who had been martyred in Morocco while spreading the word of God that year. From this point on, Saint Anthony dedicated his life to the conversion of heretics through simple, eloquent preaching. The book he is often depicted hold- ing is his famous Sermons for Feast Days, still used as the inspiration for many Franciscan sermons. Legend holds that thirty years after Anthony’s death his body was exhumed. His corpse had turned to dust but his tongue and vocal cords were intact, as vibrant and colorful as if he were still alive. His tongue was placed in a reliquary and displayed in the Padua basilica that bears Anthony’s name.

48 Gutiérrez Figure 3. Iron spur rowel detail. The rowel, used to prod the horse to perform, is designed with a combination of tear drops and hearts. Large rowels, like this one, were common in the New Mexico region. National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution.

Traditionally, Saint Anthony’s miraculous intercession is petitioned when one wants to recover something lost, be it a thing, person, or even a spiritual good. The Franciscans who went to New Mexico clearly saw the Pueblo Indian as spiritually wayward and lost. The were worshiping idols, living de- bauched lives of sinfulness, practicing incest and sodomy, and obviously under Satan’s command, or so the friars said. By cultivating the veneration of Saint An- thony as part of their larger project, they were sure that through this saint’s intercession the Pueblo Indians would be found, baptized, and led to Jesus Christ. The iron spur we examined at the start finds its meaning in the realm of animal husbandry, in warfare, and in human domination over people and ani- mals (Figure 3). It offers us a small window into the larger objectives of the con- quest. This process of domination proceeded exploitatively through the incor- poration of native peoples into the polity as tribute-paying royal subjects who were required to toil as virtual slaves. Their Hispanicization would be assured by learning to speak Spanish, by adjusting to a new work regime, by mastering the planting and harvesting of Spanish crops, and the breeding and tending of the animals brought from Spain and central Mexico. By acquiring knowledge of animal husbandry, through the raising of horses, mules, cows, pigs, and sheep, and by using European technology to forge iron plows for planting, and spurs to

Exploring the Colonial History of New Mexico 49 control horses, the Pueblo Indians someday would become productive Spanish citizens. They would be capable of living by their own wits, entering the market with their hides and tallow, with meat and lard, their donkey caravans packed with salt, ceramics, corn and woven products bound for the commercial mining centers of Mexico, which would yield them personal profit and local reward. In short, this is ideally how they would be Hispanicized. Nowhere in North or had the indigenous peoples domes- ticated large beasts of burden before 1492. Such animals were acquired through the Columbian exchange. Native Americans had domesticated turkeys, most- ly for their feathers, dogs to carry small loads and for meat, and in the Andes there had been some experimenting with the taming of llamas, but that never proved particularly successful nor was it accomplished on the scale that humans in Europe and Asia had when, centuries earlier, they domesticated and corralled horses and cattle. Don Juan de Oñate, the leader of the expedition that conquered and colo- nized the Kingdom of New Mexico in 1598, was accompanied by 12 Franciscan friars, representing Christ’s 12 original apostles, who were to spread the Gos- pel, and a party of some 129 soldiers, settlers, and slaves. The Pueblo Indians they conquered were sedentary agriculturalists who had been planting corn, beans, and squash as their dietary mainstays since the thirteenth century. Liv- ing without domesticated animals or beasts of burden, what meat entered the Pueblo Indian diet was acquired by hunting larger game animals such as bear, deer, and elk, and smaller ones, such as fish, birds, rodents, and snakes. The early Franciscan friars attested that the Pueblo Indians considered hunting a very precarious masculine activity that required the same skills and entailed the same risks as warfare. Today in the Euro-American West we think of hunting largely as a sport, a secular activity mostly undertaken by adventurers eager for a mount to place over their home’s mantel, and rarely for the meat. But for the pre-Columbian Puebloans, hunting was a necessary and a profoundly religious activity that tied humans with the powerful forces of the natural word in bonds of reciprocity. To successfully capture an elk, for example, required mastery of the , dances, and songs of the hunt that would attract the wild animal, allowing itself to be cap- tured, and, after its death, peaceably consumed to assure that its spirit would not return to wreak havoc and evil. When men prepared for the hunt, just as when they readied for war, they would enter into deep meditative states, fasting and

50 Gutiérrez smoking, purifying their bodies by abstaining from sexual contact with women, engaging in emesis and flagellation to prepare their minds and bodies for con- tact with the animal they hunted. Draping their human bodies with untanned elk hides and adorning their heads with antlers, offering cornmeal and pollen to the spirit of the elk they hoped to kill—through this ritual process, hunters transformed themselves into the hunted. Taking the life of a large game animal required an exchange, an act of human reciprocity. And so the Pueblo Indians offered food to the spirit of the elk, so that the elk would give itself as food. Only through such exchanges between the natural and supernatural, between humans and animals, would the cosmos be kept in balance.4 The Spaniards’ relationship to large draft animals was fundamentally dif- ferent: it was one of dominance and mastery. Domesticated animals were beasts of burden, dietary sources of protein, and, particularly with the horse, an essen- tial requisite for the successful waging of war. The iron spur from seventeenth- century New Mexico tells us a much larger European history of biological and technical achievements that proved quite significant in the Spanish conquest of enormous imperial states, such as those of the Aztecs in Mexico and the Incas in Peru, but also of the smaller, less densely populated city-states, such as those of the Pueblo Indians. The spur is an instrument used to forcefully jab a horse’s haunches, communicating the direction and clip its rider demands, especially when charging into battle. The horse was the biggest, strongest, and most mal- leable of Europe’s beasts of burden, used first for plowing, logging, and transport, but soon becoming the animal central to the Spanish equestrian culture of war- fare that spread to the Americas. Hernán Cortés, whose small and motley army conquered the mighty Aztec Empire in 1521, thought it quite odd and amusing that his indigenous adversaries imagined the horse and its rider not as two dis- tinct entities, but as one gigantic ghastly beast; one so strong, fast, and tall that even the most tested and fearless Aztec warrior cowered before it.5 For much of the seventeenth century the Kingdom of New Mexico was in a constant state of turmoil, mostly over the appropriation of indigenous labor. The contestants for it—the Franciscans, the governors, and the colonists—each had very different rationales for who should appropriate its bulk. The end result was a colony governed fitfully between 1598 and 1680, exploiting the indigenous population mercilessly, controlling them with brute force, and, thus, creating the conditions that sparked the of 1680. On 10 August of that year the Pueblo Indians rebelled against their overlords, killing 401 colonists and 21

Exploring the Colonial History of New Mexico 51 friars, burning the houses and church compounds in which they lived, desecrat- ing Christian religious images, and sending the survivors packing southward to what became El Paso, . Here the revolt’s refugees awaited reinforcements for the kingdom’s reconquest. Though several unsuccessful attempts were made over the next 12 years, the Kingdom of New Mexico was reconquered and finally brought back firmly under Spanish rule in 1692. The reestablishment of Spanish control over New Mexico became impera- tive to Spain for a number of geopolitical reasons. By 1700, two-thirds of all the world’s silver was being produced in the mining towns of northern Mexico. Coveting their colonial neighbor’s wealth, the French established outposts in in the . Almost simultaneously the English did likewise, with exploratory forays westward across the River. The reassertion of Spanish presence in New Mexico, and soon afterward the colonization of Texas and , created buffer colonies the Crown hoped would protect its silver fortunes and repel any possible foreign affronts. In the first century of Spanish presence in New Mexico and Arizona, the Puebloans were indeed Hispanicized. Spanish became their lingua franca and many became dependent on animal husbandry for their dietary protein and their market exchanges, forsaking hunting as a significant masculine activ- ity for several reasons. As we noted above, hunting and warfare were seen by the Puebloans as very similar activities because they each required men to abandon the civility and peaceful ethos that operated in their towns and to enter those “wild” spaces beyond civilization where one could take life, never knowing what the outcome would be. The goal of the Spanish conquest was to completely crush the capacity of the Pueblo Indians to wage war. They did this by prohibiting travel, by outlawing native hunt parties, by replacing the meat captured in hunts with that of domesticated pigs, chickens, sheep, and cattle, and by prohibiting Indians from owning or riding horses. While the Spaniards did momentarily quash Pueblo Indian hunting practices, they failed to fully eviscerate their capacity to wage war. On 10 August 1680, the date the Pueblo Revolt started, the rebels’ first strategic act was to steal and kill the principal nerve of warfare, the horses the Spaniards had introduced into the province. Without horses, the vastly outnumbered Spaniards were no match for the now mounted and armed Pueblo warriors. The Spanish soldiers and Franciscan friars returned to the Kingdom of New Mexico in 1692, chastened and significantly less iconoclastic, allowing the

52 Gutiérrez Puebloans more freedom of movement, more respect for their antique hunting and farming practices, and for their religious beliefs. As part of their Hispaniciza- tion, the Pueblo Indians had learned the function of iron spurs. In the eighteenth century much of what became northern Mexico and the American Southwest faced a new set of enemies and an almost perpetual state of war as the nomadic Comanche and Apache entered the region as equestrian warriors par excellence, having captured and tamed the wild Cimarrons the Spaniards first introduced to the land in 1540. Now the tables were turned. Having mastered the use of horses as their own instruments of war, the Comanche and preyed on Spanish towns and Pueblo villages, raiding and slaving as they wished.6 The 1725 picture of Saint Anthony of Padua, painted so carefully and el- egantly on an elk-skin hide to adorn the mission church at Santo Domingo Pueblo, retained that reverence for the spirit world that was so fundamental to the Puebloan way of relating to animals on whom they were dependent for their food and for their lives. The Franciscans clearly understood the powerful place of animals in the indigenous cosmology and thus did everything possible to fuse the iconography of the cult of the saints with images of Puebloan animals and their spiritual embodiment, or their hides. What better way to assure that the spirit of the dead elk would not return for nefarious ends than by joining its skin with an image of Saint Anthony? In this way, wayward souls would surely be led to Jesus Christ. By juxtaposing a seventeenth-century New Mexican elk-skin painting of Saint Anthony and an iron spur, one is able to deeply delve into the history of an area not well known to the American public at large—a history as unique and significant as that of the Eastern Seaboard and its English colonists. Here we explored the Christianization and the Hispanicization of the Pueblo Indians, the contradictory imperial aims that played themselves out in acculturation and resistance, in acquiescence and revolt. We studied Pueblo animism, that belief that animals, just like humans, had souls that had to be appeased if they were to give themselves up to humans as their food. The process of Christianization led us to explore the strategies the Franciscan friars used to convert their charges. And in the elk-skin painting we see the superimposition of one saint’s life onto religious dimensions of Puebloan elk-hunting practices. The result of the Co- lumbian exchange here was a fusion of Saint Anthony and an elk into one. The radically transformative power of this exchange is also evident in the iron spur we have returned to so often here from different vectors. Advanced iron-making

Exploring the Colonial History of New Mexico 53 technology signaled the presence of horses and the impact their introduction had simultaneously on how the Pueblo Indians farmed, hunted, and waged war; the expanse of agricultural production that could now be undertaken with fewer hands; and the predictability of meat in the indigenous diet. The outcomes of these exchanges of goods, ideas, and technologies was never clear and predictable; the power dynamics between colonizers and the colonized often shifted, always making indigenous people agents of their own histories. Horses, the instruments of war that had been used to conquer the Pueblo Indians in 1598, by 1680 were made their own, and through acute obser- vation the Puebloans learned how to use these horses to gain their liberation and rout Spanish colonists from the kingdom. When colonists returned in 1692, the power dynamics in the province had been turned, the Pueblo Indians becoming more autonomous and more commanding of respect. This is the story two seem- ingly unrelated objects allow us to reconstruct.

NOTES

1. Ian Woodward, Understanding Material Culture 4. Ernest Beaglehole, Hunting and Hunt- (Thousand Oaks, Calif..: SAGE Publications, ing Ritual (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007); Nicole Boivin, Material Cultures, 1936); W. W. Hill, The Agriculture and Hunting Material Minds: The Role of the Material World Methods of the Indians (New Haven: in Human Thoughts, Society, and Evolution Yale University Press, 1938); Hamilton A. Tyler, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008). Pueblo Animals and Myths (Norman: University 2. The classic work on such cultural transfers of Press, 1975). remains Alfred W. Crosby’s The Columbian Ex- 5. Hernán Cortés, Letters from Mexico, trans. and change: Biological and Cultural Consequences of ed. Anthony Pagden (New Haven: Yale Univer- 1492 (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1972) sity Press, 1986); Bernal Díaz del Castillo, The and his more recent Ecological Imperialism: The True History of the Conquest of , trans. Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900 (New Janet Burke and Ted Humphrey (Indianapolis: York: Cambridge University Press, 2004). Hackett Publishing Co., 2012). 3. Velasco quoted in Ramón A. Gutiérrez, When 6. Pekka Hämäläinen, Comanche Empire (New Jesus Came, the Corn Mothers Went Away: Haven: Yale University Press, 2009); Karl Jacoby, Marriage, Sexuality and Power in New Mexico, Shadows at Dawn: A Borderlands Massacre and 1500–1846 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, the Violence of History (New York: Penguin, 1991), 104. 2008).

54 Gutiérrez BIBLIOGRAPHY

Beaglehole, Ernest. Hopi Hunting and Hunting Gutiérrez, Ramón A. When Jesus Came, the Corn Ritual. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1936. Mothers Went Away: Marriage, Sexuality and Boivin, Nicole. Material Culture, Material Minds: Power in New Mexico, 1500–1846. Stanford: The Role of the Material World in Human Stanford University Press, 1991. Thoughts, Society, and Evolution. New York: Hämäläinen, Pekka. Comanche Empire. New Cambridge University Press, 2008. Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. Cortés, Hernán. Letters from Mexico, trans. and ed. Hill, W. W. The Agriculture and Hunting Methods of Anthony Pagden. New Haven: Yale University the Navajo Indians. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986. Press, 1938. Crosby, Alfred W. Ecological Imperialism: The Jacoby, Karl. Shadows at Dawn: A Borderlands Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900. New Massacre and the Violence of History. New York: York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Penguin, 2008. ______. The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Tyler, Hamilton A. Pueblo Animals and Myths. Cultural Consequences of 1492. Westport, Conn.: Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1975. Greenwood Press, 1972. Woodward, Ian. Understanding Material Culture. Díaz del Castillo, Bernal. The True History of the Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications, Conquest of New Spain, trans. Janet Burke 2007. and Ted Humphrey. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 2012.

Exploring the Colonial History of New Mexico 55