The Formation of Unilever 16944-Unilever 20Pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Formation of Unilever 16944-Unilever 20Pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 2 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 1 The Formation of Unilever 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 2 Unilever House, London, c1930 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:36 Page 03 In September 1929 an agreement was signed which created what The Economist described as "one of the biggest industrial amalgamations in European history". It provided for the merger in the following year of the Margarine Union and Lever Brothers Limited. The Margarine Union had been formed in 1927 by the Van den Bergh and Jurgens companies based in the Netherlands, and was later joined by a number of other Dutch and central European companies. Its main strength lay in Europe, especially Germany and the UK and its interests, whilst mostly in margarine and other edible fats, were also oil milling and animal feeds, retail companies and some soap production. Lever Brothers Limited was based in the UK but owned companies throughout the world, especially in Europe, the United States and the British Dominions. Its interests were in soap, toilet preparations, food (including some margarine), oil milling and animal feeds, plantations and African trading. One of the main reasons for the merger was competition for raw materials - animal and vegetable oils - used in both the manufacture of margarine and soap. However, the two businesses were very similar, so it made sense to merge as Unilever rather than continue to compete for the same raw materials and in the same markets. To understand how Unilever came into being you have to go back to the family companies that were instrumental in its formation. This is where our story begins. The Van den Berghs Simon Van den Bergh was born in 1819 in Geffen (the same village from which the Jurgens family was in the Netherlands and entered his father's barter also building its business). Simon decided to expand trade at an early age. Later he specialised as a butter his business by exporting butter to England, the merchant and with his seven sons - Jacob, Mauritz, biggest market for Dutch butter, but ran into financial Henry, Zadok, Izak, Arnold and Samuel - built a difficulties so, in 1870, Jacob and Henry were sent thriving butter trade from the village of Oss in Brabant to London to look after the company's interests there. The Van den Bergh factory in Rotterdam, nd. 03 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:36 Page 04 The invention of margarine in 1869, a butter substitute similar product for Van den Bergh. With their made from animal fat, changed the family’s fortunes. enthusiasm and business acumen Van den Bergh Around 1871 their rivals, the Jurgens family, obtained soon caught up with Jurgens and overtook them the formula for making margarine from its inventor, in both production and profits. The development of Mège Mouriès. Inexplicably, Jan Jurgens visited Simon hydrogenation, a technique for hardening vegetable Van den Bergh with a sample of his new product. oils made it possible to use a wide range of raw His curiosity stimulated, Simon commissioned Daniel materials, not just animal fat. In 1891 Van den Bergh Hipkins of Tipton, near Birmingham, to develop a left Oss for new headquarters in Rotterdam. The Van den Berghs in England As their business expanded in the late 19th century, The English business acted as a holding company the Van den Bergh family's resources were running low for the family's business interests everywhere. and avenues of financial backing in the Netherlands The Van den Berghs did not have to relinquish any had already been exhausted. It was easier to raise influence as they owned the ordinary shares. £450,000 capital in London, so the company went public there worth of preference shares were issued to the general on 9 March 1895, establishing a public limited public and two English directors were appointed to company. The old partnership was sold to this new company which was called Van den Bergh's watch over their interests. As managing directors and Margarine Limited (although the "Margarine" was majority shareholders in the new company, the Van den dropped after two years when the company changed Berghs preserved the original partners' control of the its name to Van den Berghs Limited on 29 May 1897). capital and management of the business. Key Brands The Sunlight trade mark was registered by Lever & Co in 1884 although the product was, at first, manufactured for them by other soapmakers. Then, in 1888, William Lever acquired land on the banks of the river Mersey and started to build his own factory, together with a village in which to house his workers that he would call Port Sunlight. By 1897 the factory was producing 2,400 tons of Sunlight household soap per week, and production of Lifebuoy, a toilet soap, was started in 1900. Lux was first used as a name for soap flakes in 1900; Lux toilet soap was launched in the USA in 1925 and Europe in 1928. Shortly afterwards began the decades long advertising campaign using film stars to promote Blue Band. The campaign used the slogan “Blue promote the brand. Lever Brothers also diversified into Band – versch gekarnd”, meaning freshly churned, and it margarine and produced the first vitaminised margarine, rapidly became the most popular margarine brand in The Viking, in 1927. Netherlands. Van den Bergh first launched their branded margarine on Solo was launched by Jurgens in 1899 to counter the Van the German market with Vitello in 1898, which was den Bergh entry into the German market. This was manufactured from animal fats, and its superior quality to followed by Pheasant. Although Jurgens registered Stork its competitors ensured its rapid success. It was soon as a trademark in London in August 1900 they did not joined by Sanella, manufactured from animal fats and introduce the branded margarine until 1920. Over the almond oil, and a Kosher margarine, Sana, in 1899. years the name Stork became synonymous with home Blue Band was launched in the UK in 1916 by Van den baking, especially in the UK. Rama was launched in Bergh, but not until 1923 in the Netherlands. It was Germany in 1924 where it quickly became a rival to Blue unusual at the time because it was made entirely from Band and, with the formation of the Margarine Union in vegetable and ground nut oils. Van den Bergh used 1927, the two brands were merged into one as Rama im Coppens, an Amsterdam advertising agency that was Blauband. influenced by English and American techniques, to 04 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:36 Page 05 BlauBand Air Transport, c1930 Fore-runner of the Equalisation Agreement In 1919 the Van den Berghs founded Van den whose entire ordinary capital was held by NV Van Bergh's Fabrieken NV in Rotterdam, to which den Bergh's Fabrieken, made an agreement that the continental interests of Van den Bergh were an agreed ratio would be maintained between the transferred. The members of the Dutch side of the dividends on the three companies' shares, and family exchanged their Van den Bergh Limited shares between any payment or liquidation. By creating and for shares in the NV company. Van den Berghs incorporating two parent companies, one in England Limited and Van den Bergh's Fabrieken NV together and one in The Netherlands, Van den Bergh avoided then headed the Van den Bergh group. These problems such as double taxation. This arrangement two companies with a third one, NV Hollandsche set the precedent for the subsequent structure of the Vereeniging tot Exploitatie van Margarinefabrieken, Margarine Union and, consequently, Unilever. The Jurgens Company In the 18th century the Jurgens family were carpenters, Jan, Henri and Arnold were also actively involved in working along the Dutch-German border repairing the firm and from the early 1870s were developing agricultural implements and farm utensils. Lacking the manufacture of margarine. ready money, many farmers paid the Jurgens in butter, which they sold in nearby towns. As this proved to By the end of 1888 Jurgens, as well as Van den Bergh, be a profitable enterprise, brothers Willem, Jan and was making margarine in Germany to counter the Leonard Jurgens moved to the Dutch town of Oss in import tariff. They launched a branded margarine, 1801 to focus their attention on the butter trade. Solo, in 1899 and succeeded in buying a large German business, A L Mohr of Hamburg, in 1904, They prospered in Oss and shrewd marriages speeded against competition from Van den Bergh. A general their progress. Two of Willem's nine children, Anton holding company, NV Anton Jurgens Vereenigde and Johannes worked with their father in the butter Fabrieken, was set up in 1906 comprising all the trade and in 1854 formed their own partnership, Jurgens’ interests in The Netherlands. Gebroeders Jurgens, to run the linseed oil mill and general business, whilst concentrating on the extension of the butter trade. By 1860 Anton's sons, 05 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:36 Page 06 The Pooling Agreements The Dutch margarine industry as a whole saw its supplies of soap and margarine, as well as glycerine, a competitive strength weaken in 1906 and 1907 by-product, for explosives. Post-war there was a because butter was in plentiful supply and this lowered boom. Jurgens had started their own plant at Purfleet the value of margarine. Van den Bergh and Jurgens in England in 1917, but began buying existing factories faced stiff competition in England from Otto Monsted, a to extend their production.
Recommended publications
  • P&G and Unilever
    Global Strategy Advisors. Challenging boundaries and beyond February 19, 2006 Unilever Unilever House, Blackfriars London EC4P 4BQ, United Kingdom Sent Via Electronic Mail RE: Strategy Analysis Ladies and Gentlemen: At the request of the Board of Directors of Unilever, we provide herein our analysis of the Personal Products Industry and a strategy analysis of both Unilever and its biggest competitor, Procter & Gamble. The enclosed analysis also provides recommendations for Unilever to improve its competitive advantage. Respectfully submitted, GSA Procter & Gamble, Unilever and the Personal Products Industry Global Strategy Advisors Lee Ann Graul, Sherry Henricks, Steve Olp and Charlene Strohecker University of Maryland, University College AMBA 607 February 19, 2006 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary i 2. Industry Analysis-Personal Products Industry 1 a. Introduction 1 b. Industry Defined 1 c. Historical Data Analysis 2 d. Major Competitors 3 e. Trends and Industry Outlook 3 f. Strategic Challenges and Opportunities 5 g. Industry Conclusions 5 3. Procter & Gamble and Unilever 6 a. Competitor Analysis: P&G 6 b. Competitor Analysis: Unilever 8 c. Strategy P&G 10 i. Business Level 10 ii. Global 11 iii. E-Business 13 iv. Corporate 14 d. Strategy: Unilever 15 i. Business Level 15 ii. Global 16 iii. E-business 17 iv. Corporate 19 e. Conclusions and Recommendations 20 4. Appendices 22 A. SIC Code 2844 and Industry Description 22 B. Global Personal Products Industry, Market Segmentation 24 C. Personal Products Industry, Five Force Analysis 25 D. Global Personal Products Industry, Market Share 30 E. Market Growth 31 F. Producer Price Index (PPI) for SIC 2844 32 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owns the Air?
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Marquette University Press Publications 1958 Who Owns the Air? Marya Mannes Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/mupress-book ,., WHO Owns the Air? by MARYA MANNES .J WHO Owns the Air? The text of this booklet was delivered as a speech by Marya Mannes on March 23, 1959, in Milwaukee, .Wisconsin. The notes are selections from her writings which have appeared in THE REPORTER, as indicated. WHO Owns the Air? by MARYA MANNES 1960 MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY PRESS Milwaukee LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATAWGUE CARD NUMBER: 60-9738 © Copyright 1960 by the Marquette University Press PIINTED AT THE MAR.QUETTE UNIVEB.SITY PB.ESS, MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, U.S.A. Foreword These comments on television were written and spoken before the quiz scandals brought into sharp focus-and on a national scale-the major faults and lacks of the commercial system. Since then, an alarmed and publicly penitent industry has promised improvements in tele­ vision fare and performed a few. Both CBS and NBC have stepped up their news and documentary programs, a number of which are scheduled-from time to time­ during prime viewing hours at night. And an independent station, WNTA, has made an extremely important break­ through by presenting a play a week, seven times a week, by distinguished writers and with excellent casts. It remains to be seen, however, how widespread and sustained these efforts will be; and whether the major weaknesses implicit in sponsored programming can ever be overcome "in the public interest." Marya Mannes ) WHO Owns the Air? I'M GOING TO START by asking you some questions.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 86 LAGOS- 3Rd November, 1965 ~ Vol. 52
    Extraordinary No. 86 LAGOS- 3rd November, 1965 ~ Vol. 52 CONTENTS ea Page Applications for Registration of Trade Marks we - .e .- .- .. 1756-95 Registration Renewed and Restored .. %. 1796 Unpaid Renewal Fees .. we . .. .. .- 1796-98 Trade Marks Removed from the Register through non-payment of Renewal Fees .. .. «L798 Cancellation on applications of the Proprietors _ .. .. ot .. - .. -. 1798 Applications amendedafter Advertisement .. oe . oe oe 1» ae «1798 Trade Marks altered under Section 41 .. .. .. o. .- .- ee fae -. 1799 cSrsections .- -. .- - oe. a . .- oe . -- 1799 ahs 1756 OFFICIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY No. 86, Vol. 52 Government Notice No. 2035 VICOLL Trade Marks Act (Chapter 199) 15036—Wood-glue and other goods included in APPLICATIONS FOR REGISTRATION OF the class. FARBWERKE HOECHST AKTIEN- ; TRADE MARKS GESELLSCHAFT, vormals Meister Lucius and Bruning, Frankfurt/Main; Manu- Pursuait to section 17 of the Trade Marks Act facturers/Merchants. notice is hereby given that applications have been - 11th July, 1963. received for registration of the following Trade Marks. Y person who has grounds of opposition to the registration of any of the marks advertised herein may within three months from the date hereof give notice to the Registrar of such opposition. Such notice must be in writing and in duplicate and set out grounds of opposition. NAFTIL 15078—Chemical products for industry and science. PECHINEY-PROGIL (S.A.) a French Com- pany duly organized and existing under Crass f the laws of France, No. 7, Rue Lamennais, Paris 8, France. MELONIA 28th January, 1964. 13883—-Industrial fragrance chemicals. ROCHE PRODUCTS LIMITED, 40 Broadwater Road, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, Crass 2 England ; Manufacturers and Merchants.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Business Time Line
    Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream Business Time Line: DATE Event Description 4th Origins of ice cream being made… China, Persians faloodeh, Nero in Rome (62 AD) century BC 15th Spanish, Italian royalty and wealthy store mountain ice in pits for summer use Century 16th Ice Cream breakthrough is when Italians learn to make ice by immersing a bucket of Century water in snow and adding potassium nitrate… later just use common salt. 1700s Jefferson and Washington In US serving ice cream 1776 First US ice cream parlor in New York City and American colonists first to use the term ice cream 1832 Augustus Jackson (Black) in Philadelphia adds salt to lower temp. White House chef to a catering business. 1846 Nancy Johnson patented hand-crank freezer 1848 William Young patents an ice cream freezer 1851 Jacob Fussell in Seven Valleys, Pennsylvania established the first large-scale commercial ice cream plant… moved to Baltimore 1870s Development of Industrial Refrigeration by German engineer Carl von Linde 1904 Walk away edible cone at the St Louis World’s Fair 1906 William Dreyer made his first frozen dessert to celebrate his German ship's arrival in America. Made Ice Cream in New York then moves to Northern California began 20 year apprenticeship with ice cream makers like National Ice Cream Company and Peerless Ice Cream. 1921 Dreyer opens own ice creamery in Visalia and one first prize at Pacific Slope Dairy Show. 1920s – Dreyer taught ice cream courses at the University of California and served as an officer in 1930s the California Dairy Industries Association.
    [Show full text]
  • 1964 Annual Report and Accounts
    REPORT AND ACCOUNTS I964 t c Directors F. J. TEMPEL, Chairman J. F. KNIGHT GEORGE COLE, Vice-Chairman ANDREW M. KNOX RUDOLF G. JURGENS, Vice-Chairman P. KUIN COLIN BAXTER D. J. MA" J. P. VAN DEN BERGH J. F. VAN MOORSEL A. F. H. BLAAUW F. J. PEDLER A. D. BONHAM CARTER R. H. SIDDONS A. W. J. CARON E. SMIT H. S. A. HARTOG A. H. SMITH M. M. VAN HENGEL J. P. STUBBS A. J. C. HOSKYNS-ABRAHALL S. G. SWEETMAN G. D. A. KLIJNSTRA E. G. WOODROOFE Advisory Directors J. M. HONIG K. P. VAN DER MANDELE A. E. J. NYSINGH J. E. DE QUAY PAUL RIJKENS JHR. J. A. G. SANDBERG Secretaries E. A. HOFMAN P. A. MACRORY Auditors PRICE WATERHOUSE & Co. COOPER BROTHERS & Co. This is a translation of the original Dutch report. c B B c s Contents Page SalientFigures ................................. 6 Report of the Directors ........................ 7-32 The Year in Brief.. ............................ 7 Sales to Third Parties, Profit and Capital Employed by Geographical Areas 1955 and 1964 (Chart) ..... 8 Return on Capital Employed and on Turnover 1955-1964 (Chart) ............................. 9 Summary of Combined Figures 1955-1964. ........ 10 The Background ............................... 11 European Integration ........................... 11 The Developing Countries ...................... 12 Taxation ..................................... 12 Analysis of Turnover ........................... 15 Margarine and Other Edible Fats ................ 16 Other Foods ................................... 17 Detergents .................................... 19 Toilet Preparations
    [Show full text]
  • Κεφάλαιο 9: Διαδραστικό Μάρκετινγκ (Interactive Marketing): Η Περίπτωση Του DOVE
    Κεφάλαιο 9: Διαδραστικό Μάρκετινγκ (Interactive Marketing): Η περίπτωση του DOVE Σύνοψη Στο κεφάλαιο αυτό θα μελετηθεί το διαδραστικό μάρκετινγκ. Είναι φανερό ότι στην εποχή της τεχνολογίας και της άμεσης επικοινωνίας, η αλληλεπίδραση με τους καταναλωτές αποτελεί σημαντικό στοιχείο για μία επιτυχημένη επιχείρηση. Πώς αναπτύσσεται ένα πρόγραμμα διαδραστικού μάρκετινγκ, ποιοι συμμετέχουν, ποια τα πλεονεκτήματα και πώς η επωνυμία τοποθετείται στο μυαλό των καταναλωτών. Αυτά είναι μερικά από τα ζητήματα που θα παρουσιαστούν μέσα από την μελέτη περίπτωσης του προϊόντος Dove. Προαπαιτούμενες γνώσεις Στοιχεία μίγματος επικοινωνίας 9. Εισαγωγή Ένα από τα πιο ισχυρά και αντιπροσωπευτικά επώνυμα προϊόντα περιποίησης γυναικείου σώματος, είναι η σειρά των προϊόντων Dove. Αποτελούν δεκαετίες τώρα μια από τις σημαίες του παγκόσμιου ομίλου Unilever. Με πρώτη κυκλοφορία το 1950, τα προϊόντα Dove κυκλοφορούν πλέον σε πάνω από 80 χώρες, απευθύνονται σε γυναίκες και δευτερευόντως σε άντρες, ενώ αποτελούν μία από τις πιο κερδοφόρες επωνυμίες του ομίλου. Τι είναι όμως αυτό που κάνει την συγκεκριμένη επωνυμία να ξεχωρίζει από τις υπόλοιπες; Ας δούμε αρχικά την αποστολή της: «Να διευρύνουμε τα σημερινά στερεότυπα για τη γυναικεία ομορφιά, ώστε να κάνει τις γυναίκες να νιώθουν όμορφες κάθε μέρα, να θεωρήσουν τον εαυτό τους σημαντικό και γι’ αυτό να τον προσέξουν». Τι σημαίνει όμως αυτό στην πράξη; Στην μελέτη περίπτωσης που ακολουθεί, αναλύεται η τελευταία επικοινωνιακή εκστρατεία του Dove– με τίτλο «Campaign for Real Beauty». Περιγράφονται βασικά ζητήματα σχετικά με την επωνυμία, για την καλύτερη κατανόηση της στρατηγικής μάρκετινγκ που εφαρμόζει. Τέλος, με αφορμή της προαναφερθείσας καμπάνιας θα δούμε πως το Dove γνωρίζει σήμερα μεγάλη επιτυχία χάρη στην εφαρμογή του Interactive Marketing (Διαδραστικό Μάρκετινγκ).
    [Show full text]
  • Unilever Annual Report 1994
    Annual Review 1994 And Summary Financial Statement English Version in Childers Unilever Contents Directors’ Report Summary Financial Statement 1 Financial Highlights 33 Introduction 2 Chairmen’s Statement 33 Dividends 4 Business Overview 33 Statement from the Auditors 12 Review of Operations 34 Summary Consolidated Accounts 26 Financial Review 29 Organisation 36 Additional Information 30 Directors & Advisory Directors Financial Highlights 1994 1993 % Change % Change at constant atwrrent a* cOnSt.3nf exchange rates exchange rates exchange rates Results (Fl. million) Turnover 82 590 83 641 77 626 6 8 Operating profit 7 012 7 107 5 397 30 32 Operating profit before excepttonal items 7 294 6 763 6 8 Exceptional items (187) (1 366) Profit on ordinary activities before taxation 6 634 6 700 5 367 24 25 Net profit 4 339 4 362 3 612 20 21 Net profit before exceptional items 4 372 4 406 4 271 -~mpy~21 E Key ratios Operating margin before exceptional items (%) 8.7 8.7 Net profit margin before exceptional items (%) 5.3 5.5 Return on capital employed (%) 16.7 15.7 Net gearing (%) 22.7 24.8 Net interest cover (times) 12.2 12.8 Combined earnings per share Guilders per Fl. 4 of ordinary capital 15.52 12.90 20 Pence per 5p of ordinary capital 83.59 69.45 20 Ordinary dividends Guilders per Fl. 4 of ordinary capital 6.19 5.88 5 Pence per 5p of ordinary capital 26.81 25.03 7 Fluctuations in exchange rates can have a significant effect on Unilever’s reported results.
    [Show full text]
  • HUL Announces Key Appointments 26­07­2013
    HUL announces key appointments 26­07­2013 26­07­2013 : Mr Nitin Paranjpe, currently the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of HUL will be joining the Unilever Leadership Executive (ULE), taking on the role of President, Home Care. Mr. Sanjiv Mehta, currently Chairman, North Africa & Middle East (NAME), Unilever, has been appointed as the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in place of Mr. Nitin Paranjpe with effect from October 1, 2013. The appointment has been approved by the Board of Directors of HUL and will be subject to approval of the company’s shareholders. He will also be responsible for South Asia cluster which includes India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Mr Harish Manwani, Chairman, HUL, said, “The changes reflect our strong commitment towards leadership development and our tradition of leveraging experiences and synergies of talent across markets. I wish to take the opportunity to express my deep appreciation for the significant contribution that Nitin made to the business in India and his leadership in driving the growth agenda. I would like to congratulate him on his richly deserved elevation to the ULE.” “I am pleased to welcome Sanjiv to his new role. Sanjiv brings with him rich experience of successfully leading businesses across developing and emerging markets. I am confident that he will further build on the growth momentum and drive the company’s agenda of competitive, consistent, profitable and responsible growth.” About Hindustan Unilever Limited Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) is India's largest Fast Moving Consumer Goods company touching the lives of two out of three Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Venturing: the Origins of Unilever's Pregnancy Test
    This article was downloaded by: [Harvard College] On: 07 January 2013, At: 13:10 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Business History Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fbsh20 Corporate venturing: the origins of Unilever's pregnancy test Geoffrey Jones a & Alison Kraft b a Harvard Business School b University of Nottingham Version of record first published: 04 Jun 2010. To cite this article: Geoffrey Jones & Alison Kraft (2004): Corporate venturing: the origins of Unilever's pregnancy test, Business History, 46:1, 100-122 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00076790412331270139 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 461bh05.qxd 28/11/03 08:23 Page 100 Corporate Venturing: The Origins of Unilever’s Pregnancy Test GEOFFREY JONES Harvard Business School ALISON KRAFT University of Nottingham The relative ability of different sizes of firm and organisational designs to develop and sustain dynamic capabilities in innovation and create new businesses remains a matter of contention.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Internationalism and African and Caribbean
    BLACK INTERNATIONALISM AND AFRICAN AND CARIBBEAN INTELLECTUALS IN LONDON, 1919-1950 By MARC MATERA A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History Written under the direction of Professor Bonnie G. Smith And approved by _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May 2008 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Black Internationalism and African and Caribbean Intellectuals in London, 1919-1950 By MARC MATERA Dissertation Director: Bonnie G. Smith During the three decades between the end of World War I and 1950, African and West Indian scholars, professionals, university students, artists, and political activists in London forged new conceptions of community, reshaped public debates about the nature and goals of British colonialism, and prepared the way for a revolutionary and self-consciously modern African culture. Black intellectuals formed organizations that became homes away from home and centers of cultural mixture and intellectual debate, and launched publications that served as new means of voicing social commentary and political dissent. These black associations developed within an atmosphere characterized by a variety of internationalisms, including pan-ethnic movements, feminism, communism, and the socialist internationalism ascendant within the British Left after World War I. The intellectual and political context of London and the types of sociability that these groups fostered gave rise to a range of black internationalist activity and new regional imaginaries in the form of a West Indian Federation and a United West Africa that shaped the goals of anticolonialism before 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Review
    AN ANALYSIS OF UNILEVER THROUGH IVO ZANDER’S INNOVATION NETWORK TAXONOMY - BASED ON ARTICLE: HOW DO YOU MEAN ‘GLOBAL’? AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF INNOVATION NETWORKS IN THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION By: Laura Cerri and Virpi Nieminen On April 18th, 2008 Solvay Business School – Université Libre de Bruxelles Course Assignment for R&D in Multinational Enterprises Professor Michele Cincera Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 Article Summary .................................................................................................................. 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................ 5 Results .......................................................................................................................... 7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 8 The case of Unilever ............................................................................................................ 9 History and Key Facts ...................................................................................................... 9 R&D Spending and Patents ............................................................................................. 9 Analysis of Unilever’s R&D according to Ivo Zander’s article .................................... 10 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • CYCLE 1 South East
    e d i s y r t n u o c & t s a o c / m o c . l a r r i w t i s i v . w w w 3 k l a W - e l a d s n i b b i D WALK 3 Eastham & Bromborough CYCLE 1 South East A circular walk linking Eastham Country Park cutting was an old railway line, used to transport products to 12 Head straight on, up a flight of steep steps and across Starting and finishing at Eastham Country Park, 5 The cyclepath continues along Stadium Road for with Dibbinsdale Local Nature Reserve. and from Port Sunlight Soap Works and the river. the railway bridge. this cycle ride takes you to the unique village of PORT SUNLIGHT VILLAGE approximately 390 metres (0.25 mile) where opposite, 4 Continue along this track, under the A41. After the 13 Having either crossed the railway bridge from the Port Sunlight where you can enjoy a ride around Map you will see the path sweeps around to the right, away Start: Eastham Country Park or Bromborough Rake from the road and down a slope, before it turns back on cycleway runs parallel with the road for about 150 metres, woods or having arrived by train at Bromborough Rake the Village, taking in the architecture, museum Railway Station. take the exit to the left. The cycleway continues straight Railway Station, leave the railway station ticket office itself and under Stadium Road. Follow this Distance: 5.5 miles. 2 - 5 hours. on to Port Sunlight.
    [Show full text]