DOCSLIB.ORG

SUBSISTENCE, SETTLEMENT, and LAND-USE CHANGES DURING the MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD on ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA by SARAH GREENHO

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SUBSISTENCE, SETTLEMENT, and LAND-USE CHANGES DURING the MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD on ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA by SARAH GREENHO SUBSISTENCE, SETTLEMENT, AND LAND-USE CHANGES DURING THE MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA by SARAH GREENHOE BERGH (Under the Direction of Elizabeth J. Reitz) ABSTRACT This research examines the human-environment interactions on St. Catherines Island, Georgia, during the late Woodland through the Mississippian period (AD 800–1580). Results from multiple analyses indicate that socio-political, demographic, and economic changes during this period were associated with changes in subsistence, settlement, and land-use patterns. Archaeofaunal collections of vertebrates and invertebrates are examined from three sites in a single locality, representing human occupation during the entire Mississippian period—9LI21, 9LI229, and 9LI230. Two additional late Mississippian archaeofaunal collections of vertebrates are examined from different island locations—9LI207 and 9LI1637. Fine-grained recovery techniques, not previously used for Mississippian deposits on St. Catherines Island, produced collections dominated by estuarine resources, especially oysters, clams, stout tagelus, sea catfishes, mullets, killifishes, and drums. Previous methods used to recover faunal remains produced collections dominated by deer. This study suggests that, though deer contributed large amounts of meat to the diet, estuarine resources were more abundant and contributed the most meat. A Mississippian chiefdom developed on the island during the Irene phase (AD 1300– 1580), with social inequality, large and dense populations living in communities of multiple, integrated settlements, and maize farming. Zooarchaeological evidence presented in this study suggests these socio-political changes led to new human-environment interactions, compared to the early Mississippian period. Irene peoples used a larger number and wider variety of shellfishing and fishing locations than early Mississippian folk. The Irene fishing strategy caught more large fishes and may have involved a shift to larger-scale mass-capture techniques, such as weirs. Irene settlements were occupied for longer periods of time and waste disposal was more organized than in earlier periods. These land-use and subsistence changes affected animal populations. Increased exploitation of estuarine resources influenced growth rates of clams and catfishes. Over time, the landscape became more open and heterogeneous, affecting the foraging habits of deer. These subtle changes are observed because of the fine-grained recovery and multiple analyses of multiple taxa. Yet, overall, the St. Catherines Island subsistence-settlement strategy, focusing on a specific suite of estuarine resources, supplemented with the occasional deer, was stable for thousands of years. INDEX WORDS: Zooarchaeology, Mississippian period, Coastal archaeology, Georgia, Stable isotope analysis, Optimal foraging theory, Resource depression, Subsistence, Land-use patterns, Environmental change SUBSISTENCE, SETTLEMENT, AND LAND-USE CHANGES DURING THE MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA by SARAH GREENHOE BERGH BA, Skidmore College, 2000 MA, Hunter College, City University of New York, 2006 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2012 © 2012 Sarah Greenhoe Bergh All Rights Reserved SUBSISTENCE, SETTLEMENT, AND LAND-USE CHANGES DURING THE MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA by SARAH GREENHOE BERGH Major Professor: Elizabeth Reitz Committee: Stephen Kowalewski Byron Freeman David Hurst Thomas Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I want to thank Betsy Reitz for all her support and guidance as my major advisor. Special thanks to David Hurst Thomas for encouraging and facilitating my research on St. Catherines Island , to Steve Kowalewski for his intellectual insights and editorial advice on the design and writing up of this research, and to Bud Freeman for his enthusiasm and insights on the coast. Funding for this research was provided by the Edward John Noble Foundation, the St. Catherines Island Foundation, the St. Catherines Island Research Program Grant, the Dienje Kenyon Fellowship of the Society for American Archaeology, and the University of Georgia (UGA) Graduate School of Arts and Humanities Dean’s Award. The stable isotope analysis was possible thanks to a number of individuals and labs. The Florida Museum of Natural History graciously provided an initial sample of archaeological deer and raccoon bones from St. Catherines Island. Thanks to Kitty Emery, Betsy Reitz, and Donna Ruhl for making that loan possible. Tom Maddox at the Stable Isotope Laboratory in the Odum School of Ecology at UGA performed the isotope analysis of that sample. The Mammalogy Department, American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) provided a modern sample of deer and raccoon bones from St. Catherines Island. Thanks to Eileen Westwig and Neil Duncan for making that loan possible, and Chelsea Graham for her help researching in the collection. John Krigbaum and Gypsy Price of the Bone Chemistry Lab, Department of Anthropology at University of Florida prepared the archaeological deer and raccoon remains, recovered during this research, and the modern sample for isotopic analysis. Jason Curtis at the Light Stable iv Isotope Mass Spectrometry Laboratory in the Department of Geological Sciences at University of Florida performed the isotopic analysis on the bone samples and modern plant and animal samples. Thanks so much to all of you for making this critical part of my dissertation possible. I also need to thank all the people involved in the St. Catherines Island Archaeological Project. Elliot Blair and Anna Semon, as my fellow “late prehistoric” researchers, provided invaluable insights in designing this project and interpreting the data, in addition to moral support during fieldwork and analysis. Elliot also provided the maps in Figures 3.2 and 3.1. Anna spent several days helping measure oysters, a tedious job I was very thankful to have help with. Lori Pendleton Thomas, Ginessa Mahar, Matt Napolitano, Rachel Cajigas, Christina Friberg, and Matt Sanger facilitated the excavation and recovery of the archaeological materials and provided invaluable help accessing records and analytical results from the Nels Nelson North American Archaeology Lab at AMNH. The 2008, 2009, and 2010 excavation crews were great—enthusiastic, thorough, and fun to work with. Irv Quitmyer, Nicole Canarozzi, and Donna Ruhl, fellow St. Catherines researchers from University of Florida, provided advice on sampling, processing, and identifying invertebrate remains. This research would never have happened without the hard work and encouragement of all these folks. Thanks a million. Special thanks to Royce Hayes for arranging my trips to St. Catherines and for his enthusiasm, insights, and friendship over the years, and to Christa Frangiamore for her interest in my project and for taking the time to help me locate and identify the plant specimens used in isotopic analysis. The St. Catherines Island staff was amazing, ferrying us to and from the island, building those beautiful nested screens, refitting the fire trucks for water screening, and clearing sites, among many other things. This research would not have been possible without all their help. v I was lucky to have such wonderful teachers and mentors in the UGA Anthropology Department; thanks especially to Rene Bobé, David Hally, Bram Tucker, Ervan Garrison, and Mark Williams. My years here would not have been as enjoyable or productive without their support. Thanks to the Anthropology Department staff, Margie Floyd, LaBau Bryan, Lisa Norris, Deb Chasteen, Jill Morris, Cabe Mottley, and Brenda Yuhas. I also want to thank the faculty and staff of the Georgia Museum of Natural History, Kim Leissner, Liz McGhee, and Carol Hoffman, for the supportive working environment at the Museum. Zooarchaeology Lab interns, staff, and volunteers contributed many hours of support to this research. Maran Little sectioned many of the clam valves and measured specimens. Carla Hadden identified the materials from TP 1 at 9LI1637 and helped with identifications from a few Meeting House Field middens. Amber Knowles measured oysters, Megan Fowler helped count oysters, and Siavash Samei counted and measured clams. Victor Iminjili rough sorted materials from two Meeting House Field middens. Kathy Wiggins, Carol Colaninno-Meeks, and Thad Meeks measured specimens or derived regression formulae for back-calculations of fish size. Alex Emmons, Kevin Gibbons, Glenn Thomas, Heather Thomas, Marianne English, Lauren Boop, and Jackie Murtha provided laboratory assistance. The lab has been a great place to work. Thanks for all your help. My fellow graduate students (and some former undergraduates) in Anthropology at UGA provided much-needed sounding boards and reality checks during my studies: Carol Colaninno, Ben Steere, Emily Beahm, Carla Hadden, Stefan Brannan, John Turck, Viki Dekle, Ellen Burlingame-Turck, Matt Compton, Kelly Orr, Jared Wood, Dan Bigman, Yanxi Wang, Patti Dunne, Matt McDaniel, Kate Dunbar, and Kristin VanderMolen. It has been a pleasure working and hanging out with all of you. vi I would also like to thank the teachers, professors, and archaeologists who inspired me to study history, archaeology, and anthropology in the first place: Jean Shaw, Cynthia Daly, Bill Holiday,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Are Deep-Sea Fisheries Sustainable? a Summary of New Scientific Analysis: Norse, E.A., S
    RESEARCH SERIES AUGUST 2011 High biological vulnerability and economic incentives challenge the viability of deep-sea fisheries. ARE DEEP-SEA FISHERIES SUSTAINABLE? A SUMMARY OF NEW SCIENTIFIC AnaLYSIS: Norse, E.A., S. Brooke, W.W.L. Cheung, M.R. Clark, I. Ekeland, R. Froese, K.M. Gjerde, R.L. Haedrich, S.S. Heppell, T. Morato, L.E. Morgan, D. Pauly, U. R. Sumaila and R. Watson. 2012. Sustainability of Deep-sea Fisheries. Marine Policy 36(2): 307–320. AS COASTAL FISHERIES have declined around the world, fishermen have expanded their operations beyond exclusive economic zones (EEZs) to the high seas beyond EEZs, including the deep sea. Although the deep sea is the largest yet least ecologically productive part of the ocean, seamounts and other habitats can host significant amounts of some deep- sea fish species, especially when they aggregate to breed and feed. Many deep-sea fishes are slow to reproduce, or produce young only sporadically, however, making commercial fisheries unsustainable. Dr. Elliott Norse of the Marine Conservation Institute and a multidisciplinary team of co-authors analyzed data on fishes, fisheries and deep-sea biology and assessed key economic drivers and international laws to determine whether deep-sea commercial fishing could be sustainable. Ultimately, the authors conclude that most deep-sea fisheries are unsustainable, especially on the high seas. This Lenfest Research Series report is a summary of the scientists’ findings. DEEP-SEA FISHERIES As coastal fisheries have declined, fishing in the deep sea has increased. Technological advances have enabled fishing vessels to travel further from shore and locate aggregations of fish in depths that were unreachable years ago (see graphic).
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAMME 4 - 7 July 2017 • Boardwalk Convention Centre • Port Elizabeth • South Africa
    SAMssPORT ELIZABETH 2017 THE 16TH SOUTHERN AFRICAN MARINE SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM PROGRAMME 4 - 7 July 2017 • www.samss2017.co.za Boardwalk Convention Centre • Port Elizabeth • South Africa Theme: Embracing the blue l Unlocking the Ocean’s economic potential whilst maintaining social and ecological resilience SAMSS is hosted by NMMU, CMR and supported by SANCOR WELCOME PLENARY SPEAKERS It is our pleasure to welcome all SAMSS 2017 participants on behalf of the ROBERT COSTANZA - The Australian National University - Australia Institute for Coastal and Marine Research at Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University and the city of Port Elizabeth. NMMU has a long tradition of marine COSTANZA has an H-index above 100 and >60 000 research and its institutional marine and maritime strategy is coming to citations. His area of specialisation is ecosystem goods fruition, which makes this an ideal time for us to host this triennial meeting. and services and ecological economics. Costanza’s Under the auspices of SANCOR, this is the second time we host SAMSS in PE and the transdisciplinary research integrates the study of theme ‘Embracing the blue – unlocking the ocean’s potential whilst maintaining social humans and nature to address research, policy, and and ecological resilience’ is highly topical and appropriate, aligning with Operation management issues. His work has focused on the Phakisa, which is the national approach to developing a blue economy. South Africa is interface between ecological and economic systems, at a cross roads and facing economic challenges. Economic growth and lifting people particularly at larger temporal and spatial scales, from out of poverty is a priority and those of us in the ‘marine’ community need to be part small watersheds to the global system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Marine Protected Areas in Sustaining Fisheries
    The role of marine protected areas in sustaining fisheries Callum Roberts University of York, UK After World War II there was much optimism that fisheries could feed the World. But at the beginning of the 21st century, we are not so sure. Quota management of fisheries in the European Union has failed to deliver sustainability 100 80 60 40 20 Percentage of Quota Fish Stocks of Quota Percentage 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Year Healthy At risk In danger Data from ICES Cod decline in the Kattegat, North Sea Extinction is the ultimate in unsustainable fishing, whether or not the species of concern are targets of the fishery What is missing from fishery management? • Real provision for habitat protection and recovery • Precautionary targets • Resolute enforcement Objectives of marine reserves Maintaining ecosystem processes and services Conservation Sustaining fisheries Tree cover www.worldwildlife.org/oceans/pdfs/fishery_effects.pdf Spillover Reproduction & Dispersal Colonization & Growth Abundance Diversity What is the evidence that reserves work? Reserves all over the world show dramatic increases in spawning stocks Usually by at least 2-3 times in 5-10 years Long-term studies in New Zealand, Philippines, Florida and many other countries show strong responses to reserve protection Fish in reserves do live longer, grow larger and produce more eggs Egg production from protected fish stocks increases by much more than stock biomass Catches do increase Soufrière Marine Management Area, St. Lucia: Established 1995 35% of reef area closed
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Provides an Opportunity to Advance a Sustainable UK Fisheries Policy in a Post-Brexit Brave New World
    Marine Policy 120 (2020) 104114 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol Short communication COVID-19 provides an opportunity to advance a sustainable UK fisheries policy in a post-Brexit brave new world Paul S. Kemp a,*, Rainer Froese b, Daniel Pauly c a International Centre for Ecohydraulics Research, Faculty of Engineering and the Physical Sciences, Southampton Boldrewood Innovation Campus, University of Southampton, SO16 7QF, UK b GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, 24105, Kiel, Germany c Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z4, Canada ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Brexit creates a systemic shock that provides a unique opportunity for the UK to implement a new sustainable Ocean harvest Fisheries Policy to better manage the multiple stocks on which future fisherswill depend on leaving the European European union fisheries policy Union. At the same time, the global slowdown of commercial fishing as a result of COVID-19 has reduced Marine fisheries management pressure on some threatened stocks to levels not seen since the Second World War. In combination, Brexit and the Water-energy-fisheries Nexus COVID-19 slowdown have created a unique opportunity to facilitate the recovery of a threatened resource. Nevertheless, challenges remain as fisheries represent only 0.12% of UK economic output, presenting a risk that opportunities for more sustainable management will be lost during wider
    [Show full text]
  • THE Official Magazine of the OCEANOGRAPHY SOCIETY
    OceThe OFFiciaaL MaganZineog OF the Oceanographyra Spocietyhy CITATION Read, A.J. 2008. Review of The Unnatural History of the Sea, by C.M. Roberts. Oceanography 21(1):112–113, http://dx.doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2008.76. COPYRIGHT This article has been published inOceanography , Volume 21, Number 1, a quarterly journal of The Oceanography Society. Copyright 2008 by The Oceanography Society. All rights reserved. USAGE Permission is granted to copy this article for use in teaching and research. Republication, systematic reproduction, or collective redistribution of any portion of this article by photocopy machine, reposting, or other means is permitted only with the approval of The Oceanography Society. Send all correspondence to: [email protected] or The Oceanography Society, PO Box 1931, Rockville, MD 20849-1931, USA. doWNLoaded From WWW.tos.org/oceanography ment of the GBR compared with many morphological impacts resulting from terrestrial national parks. The final part climate change on the GBR. NICK HARVEY (nicholas.harvey@ of this chapter reflects on the importance Overall, I think the book is an excel- adelaide.edu.au) is the Executive Dean, of global climate change and the impact lent synthesis of current knowledge on Faculty of Humanities and Social of projected sea-level rise on the GBR the geomorphology of the Great Barrier Sciences, and Professor, Geography and from a geomorphological perspective. Reef. While I agree with the authors that Environmental Studies, The University of This discussion is very relevant for the understanding geomorphological reef Adelaide, South Australia. current global debate on the impacts processes is very important in the man- of climate change such as the Fourth agement of the GBR, I don’t think that REFERENCES Assessment of the Intergovernmental this book alone will convince managers Parry, M.L., O.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuna Be, Or Not Tuna Be: Using Catch Data to Observe the Ecological Impacts of Commercial Tuna Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean at Varying Spatial Scales
    TUNA BE, OR NOT TUNA BE: USING CATCH DATA TO OBSERVE THE ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF COMMERCIAL TUNA FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN AT VARYING SPATIAL SCALES by Laurenne Louise Schiller B.Sc. (Hons.), University of Guelph, 2010 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (Zoology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) August 2014 © Laurenne Louise Schiller, 2014 ABSTRACT Tuna are arguably the world’s most valuable, versatile, yet vulnerable fishes. With current landings over 4 million tonnes annually, all species of tuna from all three major ocean basins are caught, traded, and consumed at various intensities around the globe. Understanding the implications of such an extensive industry is paramount to protecting the long-term health and sustainability of both the tuna fisheries as well as the ecosystems in which they operate. Given that the Pacific Ocean accounts for roughly two-thirds of the global commercial tuna catch, this thesis assesses the trends and ecological impacts of commercial tuna fishing at both the artisanal and industrial scale in this ocean. To observe the importance of tuna fisheries at a local scale, a case study of the Galápagos Islands is presented. In this context, it was observed that over-fishing and the subsequent depletion of large, low fecund serranids has resulted in a high level of ‘fishing down’ within the near- shore ecosystem. Consequently, as fishers are forced to expand to regions off-shore, tuna and coastal scombrids are becoming increasingly targeted. With regard to industrial fishing, tuna vessels (especially distant-water longliners) are known to generate a substantial amount of associated bycatch and discards.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of Unilever 16944-Unilever 20Pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 2
    16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 1 The Formation of Unilever 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:35 Page 2 Unilever House, London, c1930 16944-Unilever 20pp A5:Layout 1 15/11/11 14:36 Page 03 In September 1929 an agreement was signed which created what The Economist described as "one of the biggest industrial amalgamations in European history". It provided for the merger in the following year of the Margarine Union and Lever Brothers Limited. The Margarine Union had been formed in 1927 by the Van den Bergh and Jurgens companies based in the Netherlands, and was later joined by a number of other Dutch and central European companies. Its main strength lay in Europe, especially Germany and the UK and its interests, whilst mostly in margarine and other edible fats, were also oil milling and animal feeds, retail companies and some soap production. Lever Brothers Limited was based in the UK but owned companies throughout the world, especially in Europe, the United States and the British Dominions. Its interests were in soap, toilet preparations, food (including some margarine), oil milling and animal feeds, plantations and African trading. One of the main reasons for the merger was competition for raw materials - animal and vegetable oils - used in both the manufacture of margarine and soap. However, the two businesses were very similar, so it made sense to merge as Unilever rather than continue to compete for the same raw materials and in the same markets. To understand how Unilever came into being you have to go back to the family companies that were instrumental in its formation.
    [Show full text]
  • 26Th International Congress for Conservation Biology
    Program SocietySociety for for Conservation Conservation Biology Biology 26th International Congress for Conservation Biology Connecting Systems, Disciplines, and Stakeholders Baltimore, Maryland, USA • July 21-25, 2013 www.conbio.org/2013 Baltimore,2013 Maryland, USA Auckland,2011 New Zealand Edmonton,2010 Alberta, Canada Beijing,2009 China Chattanooga,2008 Tennessee, USA Port2007 Elizabeth, South Africa About the International Congress for Conservation Biology San2006 Jose, California, USA Welcome to our international forum for addressing conservation challenges. The International Congress for Conservation Biology Universidade2005 de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil is the global gathering spot for presenting and discussing new research and developments in conservation science and practice. From North America to Asia and Oceania to Europe, ICCB Columbia2004 University, New York, New York, USA moves around the world and is recognized as the most important global meeting for conservation professionals and students. University2003 of Minnesota, Duluth, Minnesota, USA Most importantly, the ICCB connects conservation professionals and serves as the premier networking opportunity for anyone University2002 of Kent at Canterbury, United Kingdom interested in conservation. University2001 of Hawaii, Hilo, Hawaii, USA About the Society for Conservation Biology Dedicated to advancing the science and practice of conserving University2000 of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA Earth’s biological diversity, SCB is a global community of conservation professionals
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of Fisheries Science
    Foundations of Fisheries Science Foundations of Fisheries Science Edited by Greg G. Sass Northern Unit Fisheries Research Team Leader Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Escanaba Lake Research Station 3110 Trout Lake Station Drive, Boulder Junction, Wisconsin 54512, USA Micheal S. Allen Professor, Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences University of Florida 7922 NW 71st Street, PO Box 110600, Gainesville, Florida 32653, USA Section Edited by Robert Arlinghaus Professor, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany James F. Kitchell A.D. Hasler Professor (Emeritus), Center for Limnology University of Wisconsin-Madison 680 North Park Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA Kai Lorenzen Professor, Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences University of Florida 7922 NW 71st Street, P.O. Box 110600, Gainesville, Florida 32653, USA Daniel E. Schindler Professor, Aquatic and Fishery Science/Department of Biology Harriett Bullitt Chair in Conservation University of Washington Box 355020, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA Carl J. Walters Professor, Fisheries Centre University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY BETHESDA, MARYLAND 2014 A suggested citation format for this book follows. Sass, G. G., and M. S. Allen, editors. 2014. Foundations of Fisheries Science. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. © Copyright 2014 by the American Fisheries Society All rights reserved. Photocopying for internal or personal use, or for the internal or personal use of specific clients, is permitted by AFS provided that the appropriate fee is paid directly to Copy- right Clearance Center (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923, USA; phone 978-750-8400.
    [Show full text]
  • Giving Wild Fish a Break: More Than Wildlife Parks, Marine Reserves Help Turn Around Whole Fishing Areas
    St. John's Telegram (Newfoundland) May 6, 2001 Sunday Final Edition Giving wild fish a break: More than wildlife parks, marine reserves help turn around whole fishing areas SOURCE: Special to The Christian Science Monitor BYLINE: Robert C. Cowen SECTION: Science; Pg. 22 LENGTH: 1199 words Oceanographer Jane Lubchenco has an upbeat take on the world's declining fisheries: Establish a system of strategically placed "no-catch" zones, and you can have your fish and eat them, too. Her advice reflects a new understanding of the power of protected marine reserves to replenish life within their borders and revitalize surrounding fisheries. It's based on what the Oregon State University marine zoologist calls the "startling and timely results" of a comprehensive three-year international effort to learn how such conservation zones fit into the ecology of the sea. Scientists who took part in the study, which was organized by the National Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis at the University of California in Santa Barbara, say they will never again look on marine reserves as merely wildlife parks in the ocean. Nature reserves on land protect what's within their borders. They do little for surrounding farm land. But marine reserves interact freely with surrounding waters. Ecologist Robert Warner at the Santa Barbara campus notes that currents transport larvae of many species. And fish and other mobile species roam widely. Warner explains that "because of their intense production," fully protected marine reserves seed their own biodiversity, and, to some extent, seed surrounding areas. "They work for all stakeholders" in a fishing area, including the fishers, he says.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists' Biographies
    SCIENTISTS’ BIOGRAPHIES Dr. Sylvia Earle Renowned US oceanographer and environmentalist, Dr. Sylvia Earle is Executive Director of Conservation International’s Global Marine Division and Explorer-in-residence at the National Geographic Society. She also serves on various boards, foundations and committees relating to marine research, policy and conservation, including the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Duke University Marine Laboratory, World Wildlife Fund, and The World Resources Institute. Dr. Earle received her B.S. from Florida State University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Duke University, and also holds numerous honorary degrees. She has pioneered research on marine ecosystems and has led or participated in more than 50 expeditions representing 6,000 hours underwater, including a record-setting solo descent to 3,000 feet in a submersible craft. She also holds a depth record for solo diving (1000 meters). In 1970, Dr. Earle led a team of women aquanauts who lived underwater for two weeks in an expedition known as Tektite II, Mission 6. From 1980 to 1984 she served on the President's Advisory Committee on Oceans and Atmosphere and in 1990 was appointed Chief Scientist of the US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), where she served until 1992. Concerned to raise public awareness of the damage being done to the aquasphere by pollution and environmental degradation, Earle is the author of more than 130 scientific and popular publications, including the National Geographic Atlas of the Ocean and the 1995 book Sea Change, in which she argues against the use of deep sea bottom trawlers that destroy habitats and sweep up non-target fish in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Global Fisheries
    Trends in Global Fisheries Likely Causes & Possible Solutions Rainer Froese IFM-GEOMAR Kiel, Germany Presentation at the WTO Forum in Geneva 17 September 2010 I gratefully acknowledge permission to use slides from Daniel Pauly, Boris Worm, Ram Myers, and Villy Christensen The Status of Global Fisheries 150 Years of Newfoundland Cod Fishery A typical Fishery.. 100 Fully exploited Developing 50 Percent Overfished Un- Collapsed developed or closed 10 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Years Froese and Kesner-Reyes, ICES 2002 Trends in Global Fisheries 100% 26% 22% Collapsed 5.1 years 4.1 years 31% 80% 5.0 years Overfished Fully exploited 60% 38% Developing 4.3 years 40% Undeveloped Percent of World Fisheries World of Percent 20% 0% ? 1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 Years Froese and Kesner-Reyes, ICES 2002 Out of Current Stocks in 2048 ? Worm et al., Science 2006 Stocks (%) 2048 ? Reality CheckCatch in 2008 100% r2=0.975 90% 80% 2110 70% 60% C OF 50% FE D Percentage U 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Years Froese et al. 2008, Marine Policy Out of New Stocks in 2020 45 40 y = 24.27 - 0.4761 x r2 = 0.4780 35 30 25 20 15 Number of new stocks new of Number 10 5 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Year Froese et al. 2008, Marine Policy (t/km2) Biomass of Table Fish in 1900 Christensen et al. 2003 and in 2000…. Christensen et al. 2003 Catch per 100 Hooks 1952 - 1980 Blue Marlin Swordfish Bluefin Tuna Dolphinfish Source: Myers and Worm 2003.
    [Show full text]