DOCSLIB.ORG

Europe Must Ban Electric Pulse Fishing 14 Nov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Europe Must Ban Electric Pulse Fishing 14 Nov Europe must ban electric pulse fishing 14 Nov. 2017 European waters are subject to the expansion of a new, radically effective and devastating fishing method for both marine ecosystems and fishers: electric pulse fishing. Although prohibited since 1998, the European Commission nonetheless started granting exemptions from 2007 to equip vessels with electrodes that send electrical impulses through the sediment in order to electrocute and dislodge the animals that live in it. Aside from the serious ethical and animal welfare concerns this method raises and the utter lack of management framework to monitor it, pulse fishing represents a continuation of long-term historic patterns of overfishing in which ever greater catching power is achieved at the expense of growing environmental damage. European waters have been fished for centuries and are now among the most overexploited in the world. According to a review published by the French Fisheries Association (AFH), fewer than 10% (accounting for 24% of landed volumes) of the 167 northeast Atlantic fish stocks evaluated in 2016 were fished sustainably. The state of the other stocks was either uncertain or frankly bad. Reducing the fishing effort must be the absolute priority if we want to enable fish stocks to rebuild, and fishing activities — which depend on a robust resource — to achieve sustainability and economic viability. Accepting the development of pulse fishing would threaten these objectives, as fishing effort would be multiplied and overexploitation aggravated. Yet again, technology will lead to massive job destruction, as many fishers will have to be sacrificed in order to compensate for much more efficient pulse trawlers. Small-scale coastal fishers are already hit, since pulse trawlers have spread to fragile inshore habitats, negatively impacting their fishing grounds as well as the breeding and nursery areas of many key species. Accepting the development of pulse fishing would also implicitly mean we admit failure: there are not enough fish left for fishers to fill their nets without needing increasingly efficient fishing gears. Industrial fishers are pushed into a technological escalation to compensate for a diminished resource. This is how Dutch trawlers got to the point where they started electrocuting marine organisms in order to capture those hiding in the sand and mud. A few years ago it was unthinkable, but now it happens every day. Despite good intentions, Europe still does not manage its fisheries in a way that guarantees successful rebuilding of fish populations. On the contrary, European funds even foster the development of this brutal fishing method. Several million euros have already been awarded to support "innovation", on the grounds that pulse fishing consumes less fuel than conventional bottom trawling, in which nets are dragged across the seabed. This argument is fallacious, as it could pave the way for other destructive practices such as explosives. All environmental, biological, and ethical criteria must be accounted for. How does using electricity impact other marine fauna, fish fry, crustaceans, invertebrates and electro- sensitive fish such as sharks? Testimonies from fishers are blunt: it is underwater carnage. In Hong Kong and China, pulse fishing has been banned since the late 1990s. The 1998 Hong Kong’s Fisheries Protection Bill indicates that “Electric fishing harms or even kills most fish, including fish fry and other marine life. Such methods of fishing have a long-term deleterious effect on fisheries resources and the marine ecosystem.” As a result, pulse fishing is considered an offence in these countries and is as severely punished as fishing with explosives or toxic substances. Anyone who practices it is liable to imprisonment. France strongly opposed electric pulse fishing in February 2017. Mrs Ségolène Royal, then Minister of Ecology, called on the European Commission to take a clear decision to prohibit pulse fishing. Instead, the Commission's legislative proposal currently under discussion in the European Parliament seeks to extend pulse fishing in Europe and to mainstream it as a 'conventional' fishing method, which it will never be. On November 21, the PECH Committee Members of the European Parliament will be voting on the issue of whether to mainstream pulse fishing. We call on all MEPs to abide by the Sustainable Development Goals adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 2015, and in particular the objective to "end destructive fishing practices by 2020". By voting for a strict ban on pulse fishing in Europe and for all European vessels, MEPs will act as the true guardians of marine ecosystems and fishing communities. They will endorse a vision based on the health and productivity of the marine environment, not its desertification. Signatories: Ségolène Royal, Chair of COP21, former French Minister of Ecology Richard Benyon, UK Minister for Fisheries and the Natural Environment 2010-2013 Yannick Jadot, Member of the European Parliament (Greens/European Free Alliance) Anja Hazekamp, Member of the European Parliament (Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left) Isabelle Thomas, Member of the European Parliament (Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats) Philippe Cury, Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) Callum Roberts, University of York Rainer Froese, Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research (GEOMAR) Didier Gascuel, Université européenne de Bretagne, Agrocampus Ouest Daniel Pauly, University of British Columbia Rashid Sumaila, University of British Columbia Ellen Pikitch, Stony Brook University Yunne-Jai Shin, Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) Olivier Maury, Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) Marta Coll, Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) François Bonhomme, University of Montpellier .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PROGRAMME 4 - 7 July 2017 • Boardwalk Convention Centre • Port Elizabeth • South Africa
    SAMssPORT ELIZABETH 2017 THE 16TH SOUTHERN AFRICAN MARINE SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM PROGRAMME 4 - 7 July 2017 • www.samss2017.co.za Boardwalk Convention Centre • Port Elizabeth • South Africa Theme: Embracing the blue l Unlocking the Ocean’s economic potential whilst maintaining social and ecological resilience SAMSS is hosted by NMMU, CMR and supported by SANCOR WELCOME PLENARY SPEAKERS It is our pleasure to welcome all SAMSS 2017 participants on behalf of the ROBERT COSTANZA - The Australian National University - Australia Institute for Coastal and Marine Research at Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University and the city of Port Elizabeth. NMMU has a long tradition of marine COSTANZA has an H-index above 100 and >60 000 research and its institutional marine and maritime strategy is coming to citations. His area of specialisation is ecosystem goods fruition, which makes this an ideal time for us to host this triennial meeting. and services and ecological economics. Costanza’s Under the auspices of SANCOR, this is the second time we host SAMSS in PE and the transdisciplinary research integrates the study of theme ‘Embracing the blue – unlocking the ocean’s potential whilst maintaining social humans and nature to address research, policy, and and ecological resilience’ is highly topical and appropriate, aligning with Operation management issues. His work has focused on the Phakisa, which is the national approach to developing a blue economy. South Africa is interface between ecological and economic systems, at a cross roads and facing economic challenges. Economic growth and lifting people particularly at larger temporal and spatial scales, from out of poverty is a priority and those of us in the ‘marine’ community need to be part small watersheds to the global system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Marine Protected Areas in Sustaining Fisheries
    The role of marine protected areas in sustaining fisheries Callum Roberts University of York, UK After World War II there was much optimism that fisheries could feed the World. But at the beginning of the 21st century, we are not so sure. Quota management of fisheries in the European Union has failed to deliver sustainability 100 80 60 40 20 Percentage of Quota Fish Stocks of Quota Percentage 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Year Healthy At risk In danger Data from ICES Cod decline in the Kattegat, North Sea Extinction is the ultimate in unsustainable fishing, whether or not the species of concern are targets of the fishery What is missing from fishery management? • Real provision for habitat protection and recovery • Precautionary targets • Resolute enforcement Objectives of marine reserves Maintaining ecosystem processes and services Conservation Sustaining fisheries Tree cover www.worldwildlife.org/oceans/pdfs/fishery_effects.pdf Spillover Reproduction & Dispersal Colonization & Growth Abundance Diversity What is the evidence that reserves work? Reserves all over the world show dramatic increases in spawning stocks Usually by at least 2-3 times in 5-10 years Long-term studies in New Zealand, Philippines, Florida and many other countries show strong responses to reserve protection Fish in reserves do live longer, grow larger and produce more eggs Egg production from protected fish stocks increases by much more than stock biomass Catches do increase Soufrière Marine Management Area, St. Lucia: Established 1995 35% of reef area closed
    [Show full text]
  • THE Official Magazine of the OCEANOGRAPHY SOCIETY
    OceThe OFFiciaaL MaganZineog OF the Oceanographyra Spocietyhy CITATION Read, A.J. 2008. Review of The Unnatural History of the Sea, by C.M. Roberts. Oceanography 21(1):112–113, http://dx.doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2008.76. COPYRIGHT This article has been published inOceanography , Volume 21, Number 1, a quarterly journal of The Oceanography Society. Copyright 2008 by The Oceanography Society. All rights reserved. USAGE Permission is granted to copy this article for use in teaching and research. Republication, systematic reproduction, or collective redistribution of any portion of this article by photocopy machine, reposting, or other means is permitted only with the approval of The Oceanography Society. Send all correspondence to: [email protected] or The Oceanography Society, PO Box 1931, Rockville, MD 20849-1931, USA. doWNLoaded From WWW.tos.org/oceanography ment of the GBR compared with many morphological impacts resulting from terrestrial national parks. The final part climate change on the GBR. NICK HARVEY (nicholas.harvey@ of this chapter reflects on the importance Overall, I think the book is an excel- adelaide.edu.au) is the Executive Dean, of global climate change and the impact lent synthesis of current knowledge on Faculty of Humanities and Social of projected sea-level rise on the GBR the geomorphology of the Great Barrier Sciences, and Professor, Geography and from a geomorphological perspective. Reef. While I agree with the authors that Environmental Studies, The University of This discussion is very relevant for the understanding geomorphological reef Adelaide, South Australia. current global debate on the impacts processes is very important in the man- of climate change such as the Fourth agement of the GBR, I don’t think that REFERENCES Assessment of the Intergovernmental this book alone will convince managers Parry, M.L., O.F.
    [Show full text]
  • SUBSISTENCE, SETTLEMENT, and LAND-USE CHANGES DURING the MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD on ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA by SARAH GREENHO
    SUBSISTENCE, SETTLEMENT, AND LAND-USE CHANGES DURING THE MISSISSIPPIAN PERIOD ON ST. CATHERINES ISLAND, GEORGIA by SARAH GREENHOE BERGH (Under the Direction of Elizabeth J. Reitz) ABSTRACT This research examines the human-environment interactions on St. Catherines Island, Georgia, during the late Woodland through the Mississippian period (AD 800–1580). Results from multiple analyses indicate that socio-political, demographic, and economic changes during this period were associated with changes in subsistence, settlement, and land-use patterns. Archaeofaunal collections of vertebrates and invertebrates are examined from three sites in a single locality, representing human occupation during the entire Mississippian period—9LI21, 9LI229, and 9LI230. Two additional late Mississippian archaeofaunal collections of vertebrates are examined from different island locations—9LI207 and 9LI1637. Fine-grained recovery techniques, not previously used for Mississippian deposits on St. Catherines Island, produced collections dominated by estuarine resources, especially oysters, clams, stout tagelus, sea catfishes, mullets, killifishes, and drums. Previous methods used to recover faunal remains produced collections dominated by deer. This study suggests that, though deer contributed large amounts of meat to the diet, estuarine resources were more abundant and contributed the most meat. A Mississippian chiefdom developed on the island during the Irene phase (AD 1300– 1580), with social inequality, large and dense populations living in communities of multiple, integrated settlements, and maize farming. Zooarchaeological evidence presented in this study suggests these socio-political changes led to new human-environment interactions, compared to the early Mississippian period. Irene peoples used a larger number and wider variety of shellfishing and fishing locations than early Mississippian folk. The Irene fishing strategy caught more large fishes and may have involved a shift to larger-scale mass-capture techniques, such as weirs.
    [Show full text]
  • 26Th International Congress for Conservation Biology
    Program SocietySociety for for Conservation Conservation Biology Biology 26th International Congress for Conservation Biology Connecting Systems, Disciplines, and Stakeholders Baltimore, Maryland, USA • July 21-25, 2013 www.conbio.org/2013 Baltimore,2013 Maryland, USA Auckland,2011 New Zealand Edmonton,2010 Alberta, Canada Beijing,2009 China Chattanooga,2008 Tennessee, USA Port2007 Elizabeth, South Africa About the International Congress for Conservation Biology San2006 Jose, California, USA Welcome to our international forum for addressing conservation challenges. The International Congress for Conservation Biology Universidade2005 de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil is the global gathering spot for presenting and discussing new research and developments in conservation science and practice. From North America to Asia and Oceania to Europe, ICCB Columbia2004 University, New York, New York, USA moves around the world and is recognized as the most important global meeting for conservation professionals and students. University2003 of Minnesota, Duluth, Minnesota, USA Most importantly, the ICCB connects conservation professionals and serves as the premier networking opportunity for anyone University2002 of Kent at Canterbury, United Kingdom interested in conservation. University2001 of Hawaii, Hilo, Hawaii, USA About the Society for Conservation Biology Dedicated to advancing the science and practice of conserving University2000 of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA Earth’s biological diversity, SCB is a global community of conservation professionals
    [Show full text]
  • Giving Wild Fish a Break: More Than Wildlife Parks, Marine Reserves Help Turn Around Whole Fishing Areas
    St. John's Telegram (Newfoundland) May 6, 2001 Sunday Final Edition Giving wild fish a break: More than wildlife parks, marine reserves help turn around whole fishing areas SOURCE: Special to The Christian Science Monitor BYLINE: Robert C. Cowen SECTION: Science; Pg. 22 LENGTH: 1199 words Oceanographer Jane Lubchenco has an upbeat take on the world's declining fisheries: Establish a system of strategically placed "no-catch" zones, and you can have your fish and eat them, too. Her advice reflects a new understanding of the power of protected marine reserves to replenish life within their borders and revitalize surrounding fisheries. It's based on what the Oregon State University marine zoologist calls the "startling and timely results" of a comprehensive three-year international effort to learn how such conservation zones fit into the ecology of the sea. Scientists who took part in the study, which was organized by the National Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis at the University of California in Santa Barbara, say they will never again look on marine reserves as merely wildlife parks in the ocean. Nature reserves on land protect what's within their borders. They do little for surrounding farm land. But marine reserves interact freely with surrounding waters. Ecologist Robert Warner at the Santa Barbara campus notes that currents transport larvae of many species. And fish and other mobile species roam widely. Warner explains that "because of their intense production," fully protected marine reserves seed their own biodiversity, and, to some extent, seed surrounding areas. "They work for all stakeholders" in a fishing area, including the fishers, he says.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists' Biographies
    SCIENTISTS’ BIOGRAPHIES Dr. Sylvia Earle Renowned US oceanographer and environmentalist, Dr. Sylvia Earle is Executive Director of Conservation International’s Global Marine Division and Explorer-in-residence at the National Geographic Society. She also serves on various boards, foundations and committees relating to marine research, policy and conservation, including the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Duke University Marine Laboratory, World Wildlife Fund, and The World Resources Institute. Dr. Earle received her B.S. from Florida State University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Duke University, and also holds numerous honorary degrees. She has pioneered research on marine ecosystems and has led or participated in more than 50 expeditions representing 6,000 hours underwater, including a record-setting solo descent to 3,000 feet in a submersible craft. She also holds a depth record for solo diving (1000 meters). In 1970, Dr. Earle led a team of women aquanauts who lived underwater for two weeks in an expedition known as Tektite II, Mission 6. From 1980 to 1984 she served on the President's Advisory Committee on Oceans and Atmosphere and in 1990 was appointed Chief Scientist of the US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), where she served until 1992. Concerned to raise public awareness of the damage being done to the aquasphere by pollution and environmental degradation, Earle is the author of more than 130 scientific and popular publications, including the National Geographic Atlas of the Ocean and the 1995 book Sea Change, in which she argues against the use of deep sea bottom trawlers that destroy habitats and sweep up non-target fish in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Centre Report 1993-2000
    19931993 -- 20002000 ReportReport TheThe FFisheriesisheries CentrCentree UnivUniversityersity ofof BritishBritish ColumbiaColumbia Forewords want to congratulate all the members of the Fisheries Centre whose Iachievements are recorded in this excellent report. Over a very short time period, the Centre has contributed many exciting new initiatives in the areas of sustainable development and the planned growth of our fisheries. British Columbia is a vast treas- ure-house of natural resources, but we must exercise responsible stewardship over the complex ecosystems that surround us if we hope to preserve that treasure for future generations. The Fisheries Centre brings together government agencies, First Nations, and the University in a vital collaboration, offering an excellent model of how to ad- dress an issue of both regional and global importance through multidisciplinary research and teaching. Many problems lie ahead, but this report gives us reason to be optimistic about our ability to find solutions. DR MARTHA PIPER PRESIDENT, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA am delighted that, in its first eight years, the Fisheries Centre is successfully Ifulfilling its mandate as one of 26 interdisciplinary research units within the Faculty of Graduate Studies. The output reviewed in this report not only underlines the Centres influential global role in its field, but also reflects the remarkable drive and enthusiasm of its members. An internal report in 1996 identified poor accommodation as one of the main weaknesses and so we are pleased to see reported here the success in attracting Canada Foundation for Innovation funding that will provide a new home for Fisheries Centre members. The Faculty of Graduate Studies is proud to provide con- tinuing support for the Fisheries Centre in its activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Effectiveness of the World's Marine Fisheries
    Management Effectiveness of the World’s Marine Fisheries Camilo Mora1,2*, Ransom A. Myers2{, Marta Coll2,3, Simone Libralato4, Tony J. Pitcher5, Rashid U. Sumaila6, Dirk Zeller6, Reg Watson6, Kevin J. Gaston7, Boris Worm2 1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America, 2 Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 3 Institut de Cie`nces del Mar, ICM-CSIC, Passeig Marı´tim de la Barceloneta, Barcelona, Spain, 4 Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale–OGS, Sgonico-Zgonik, Italy, 5 Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 6 Sea Around Us Project, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 7 Biodiversity and Macroecology Group, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom Abstract Ongoing declines in production of the world’s fisheries may have serious ecological and socioeconomic consequences. As a result, a number of international efforts have sought to improve management and prevent overexploitation, while helping to maintain biodiversity and a sustainable food supply. Although these initiatives have received broad acceptance, the extent to which corrective measures have been implemented and are effective remains largely unknown. We used a survey approach, validated with empirical data, and enquiries to over 13,000 fisheries experts (of which 1,188 responded) to assess
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Community Calls on the Members of the European
    October 2013 Dear Member of the European Parliament, As members of the international science community, we write to you with grave concern about the state of Europe’s seas. The reforms of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), have provided the European Union (EU) with a great opportunity to play a large role in stopping global overfishing through the significant reduction of subsidies to the fishing sector. We urge you, as elected representatives of the citizens of the EU, to use your leadership to guide the European Parliament in addressing this global challenge. Our marine ecosystems are at a tipping point, and overfishing represents one of the greatest threats to their productivity. Our lifetime of experience in studying ocean ecosystems and marine fisheries has allowed us to witness the significant changes that have occurred in the marine environment and its exploitation. In mere decades, developments in fishing technology have sent fishing vessels further and deeper than ever envisioned1, catching amounts of fish that are no longer sustainable2. Many fish stocks, including those of species at the top of the marine food chain, have been depleted to only a fraction of their historical levels3. Historically, subsidies have contributed to boosting the EU’s fleet capacity by massively funding the construction of new vessels.4 As a consequence, the EU’s fishing fleet is estimated to be two 1 E. Norse et al. (2012) Sustainability of deep-sea fisheries, Marine Policy 36: 307–320 2 U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): more than 85 percent of the world’s fisheries are now overexploited, fully exploited, significantly depleted or recovering from overexploitation in FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia's Dynamic Marine Protected Area Policy Seascape
    Shifting Waters - Indonesia's Dynamic Marine Protected Area Policy Seascape by Paul van Nimwegen Bachelor of Applied Science, Southern Cross University This thesis is presented for the degree of Research Masters with Training Murdoch University February 2017 Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. Paul van Nimwegen February 2017 Paul van Nimwegen Abstract The coastal waters of Indonesia are among the planet’s most biologically diverse. They also provide food and income for thousands of vulnerable coastal communities. These ecosystems are increasingly being degraded from overexploitation and other threats. Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are essential for supporting the sustainable management of the country’s marine resources and contributing to the food security of coastal communities. However, these conservation initiatives suffer from chronically low levels of effectiveness. A robust policy framework is vital for creating effective natural resource management regimes. This study rigorously reviewed Indonesia’s MPA policy arrangements and examined whether they reflect contemporary theory and practice. It also examined how Indonesia’s MPA policies are being implemented in the field using the Eastern Indonesian case-study sites of Raja Ampat Islands MPA and Sawu Sea Marine National Park. With this information, the research identified policy needs and opportunities for improving MPA performance. A variety of methods were employed to collect data, including in-depth literature and policy reviews, semi-structured interviews and field visits. The research found that although Indonesia’s MPA policy arrangements capture many aspects of contemporary theory and practice, some significant issues exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Deep Sea Corals in US Waters
    Status of Deep Sea Corals in US Waters With Recommendations for Their Conservation and Management ii “Deep sea ecosystems support bizarre and beautiful life forms, some of them hundreds or even thousands of years old. They are being clear-cut by bottom trawl fishing. Today’s fisheries are squandering the riches of the deep sea and if they are not stopped we will lose them forever. No industry has the right to destroy the heritage of humanity.” Professor Callum Roberts, professor of marine conservation at the University of York in England and a Pew Fellow in Marine Conservation Executive Summary This report focuses on 5 taxa of survival of deep sea corals, as well as The ocean—especially the deep deep sea corals found in US waters, oil and gas exploration and extrac- ocean—is the last frontier of explora- stony corals, gold corals, black corals, tion, coral collection and a number tion, exploitation and management gorgonian corals and hydrocorals. of other human activities that contact on our planet. With demand for They come in various shapes and the seafloor. Impacts from pollu- seafood and petroleum products sizes, from massive reefs miles long to tion, climate change and invasive exacting an ever-increasing toll on the single bushy shaped individuals many species are poorly known but real deep sea, damage to deep sea corals feet tall. Our understanding of their threats. The effects of most of these is a growing worldwide conservation distribution is expanding, but is cur- activities are relatively unstudied concern. Recent deep sea exploration rently limited and varies greatly across and there is almost no monitoring of has revealed spectacularly diverse the different marine waters of the seafloor ecosystems anywhere in the seafloor communities.
    [Show full text]