DVRPC Approved Projects for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 New Jersey Highway Projects (Local) Status Updates
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Battles of Germantown: Public History and Preservation in America’S Most Historic Neighborhood During the Twentieth Century
The Battles of Germantown: Public History and Preservation in America’s Most Historic Neighborhood During the Twentieth Century Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By David W. Young Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Steven Conn, Advisor Saul Cornell David Steigerwald Copyright by David W. Young 2009 Abstract This dissertation examines how public history and historic preservation have changed during the twentieth century by examining the Germantown neighborhood of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Founded in 1683, Germantown is one of America’s most historic neighborhoods, with resonant landmarks related to the nation’s political, military, industrial, and cultural history. Efforts to preserve the historic sites of the neighborhood have resulted in the presence of fourteen historic sites and house museums, including sites owned by the National Park Service, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and the City of Philadelphia. Germantown is also a neighborhood where many of the ills that came to beset many American cities in the twentieth century are easy to spot. The 2000 census showed that one quarter of its citizens live at or below the poverty line. Germantown High School recently made national headlines when students there attacked a popular teacher, causing severe injuries. Many businesses and landmark buildings now stand shuttered in community that no longer can draw on the manufacturing or retail economy it once did. Germantown’s twentieth century has seen remarkably creative approaches to contemporary problems using historic preservation at their core. -
Nomination of Historic Building, Structure, Site, Or
NOMINATION OF HISTORIC BUILDING, STRUCTURE, SITE, OR OBJECT PHILADELPHIA REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION SUBMIT ALL ATTACHED MATERIALS ON PAPER AND IN ELECTRONIC FORM ON CD (MS WORD FORMAT) 1. ADDRESS OF HISTORIC RESOURCE (must comply with a Board of Revision of Taxes address) Street address:___ 125 W. Walnut Lane _______________________________________ Postal code:___ 19144 _____ Councilmanic District:__ 8 _____________________ 2. NAME OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Historic Name:_____ George T. Pearson Residence ___________________________________ Common Name:_________________________________________________________________ 3. TYPE OF HISTORIC RESOURCE Building Structure Site Object 4. PROPERTY INFORMATION Condition: excellent good fair poor ruins Occupancy: occupied vacant under construction unknown Current use:____ Offices ________________________________________________________ 5. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Please attach a plot plan and written description of the boundary. 6. DESCRIPTION Please attach a description of the historic resource. 7. SIGNIFICANCE Please attach the Statement of Significance. Period of Significance (from year to year): from __ 1893 ___ to __ 1955 ___ Date(s) of construction and/or alteration:____ c. 1893 ___________________________________ Architect, engineer, and/or designer:___ George T. Pearson ______________________________ Builder, contractor, and/or artisan:___________________________________________________ Original owner:___ George T. & Mary Pearson _________________________________________ -
The Social Effects of Preservation: Social Wellbeing and the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program in Philadelphia
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2013 The Social Effects of Preservation: Social Wellbeing and the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program in Philadelphia Ellis Miller Mumford University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Mumford, Ellis Miller, "The Social Effects of Preservation: Social Wellbeing and the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program in Philadelphia" (2013). Theses (Historic Preservation). 217. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/217 Suggested Citation: Mumford, Ellis Miller (2013). The Social Effects of Preservation: Social Wellbeing and the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program in Philadelphia. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/217 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Social Effects of Preservation: Social Wellbeing and the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program in Philadelphia Abstract This thesis was intended to begin to fill in a gap in preservation literature by beginning research in Philadelphia and evaluating how, if at all, historic preservation affects social wellbeing. By considering tax credit investment alongside various statistical measures of social wellbeing in Philadelphia census block groups, this study tested some hypotheses about the power of preservation in community revitalization. The primary hypothesis tested is that historic preservation activity improves social wellbeing in Philadelphia. More specific hypotheses include: • Historic preservation improves the physical appearance of neighborhoods. • Historic preservation reduces crime, especially building-specific crime such as arson and graffiti. • Historic preservation preserves affordable housing. • Historic preservation creates more educated communities. -
The Changing Landscape of the Chestnut Hill West Line
- Discovering Chestnut Hill: The changing landscape of the Chestnut Hi... https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com/2019/10/17/discovering-chestnut-hill-... Links (https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com/links/) Archives (http://nl.newsbank.com/sites/chlp/) Classifieds (/classifieds2015/) Careers (https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com/careers/) Contact (https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com/contact/) About (https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com/about/) Advertising (https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com/advertising/) Subscribe (https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com/subscribe/) Welcome to Chestnut Hill (https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com/welcome-chestnut-hill/) (https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com) Posted on October 17, 2019 (https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com/2019/10/17/discovering-chestnut-hill-the-changing- landscape-of-the-chestnut-hill-west-line/) by Contributor (https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com/author/contributor/) by Alex Bartlett Last spring, the Chestnut Hill Conservancy held its first of two programs on the history of railroads in Chestnut Hill. The focus of the spring program was the history of SEPTA’s Chestnut Hill East line and consisted of a walking tour, highlighting the history and architecture of buildings and landscapes along the former Reading Railroad line. On Saturday, Nov. 9, the second program will be held, featuring the history of the Chestnut Hill West line. The Chestnut Hill West line – formerly the Pennsylvania Railroad’s line to Chestnut Hill – was opened in 1884. Pennsylvania Railroad executive Henry Howard Houston purchased land 1 of 5 10/29/2019 11:33 AM - Discovering Chestnut Hill: The changing landscape of the Chestnut Hi... https://www.chestnuthilllocal.com/2019/10/17/discovering-chestnut-hill-... along the proposed right-of-way of this new line and developed his planned community of Wissahickon Heights centered around a station by the same name. -
2005 Cabot Boulevard West Bucks County Business Park Langhorne, PA 19047
Roddy Inc. Glenview Corporate Center Industrial & Commercial Real Estate 3220 Tillman Drive, Suite 403 Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020-2028 215.245.2600 Office 215.245.2670 Fax www.roddyinc.com [email protected] PREMISES: 2005 Cabot Boulevard West Bucks County Business Park Langhorne, PA 19047 LOT SIZE: 6.06 Acres SIZE OF BUILDING: Approximately 22,001 square feet. AVAILABLE UNIT: An approximate 3,667 square foot office unit with seven (7) private offices, one (1) conference room and one (1) open bullpen area. Finishes include mix of carpet and VCT flooring, painted drywall, 2’ x 4’ acoustical ceiling tiles and 2’ x 4’ fluorescent lighting. AGE OF BUILDING: Constructed 1984. HVAC: Heated and cooled. EXTERIOR LIGHTING: Wall mounted fixtures. TOILET FACILITIES: One (1) unisex restroom containing one (1) water closet and one (1) lavatory. LOCATION: Strategically situated southeast of the intersection of Route 1 and Interstate 95, the property is surrounded by a network of interstate highways, including the Pennsylvania Turnpike, the New Jersey Turnpike and bridges to New Jersey. The property is just thirty-five (35) minutes from Philadelphia’s central business district, ten (10) minutes from Trenton, NJ and eighty (80) minutes from New York. The property is adjacent to the Oxford Valley Mall, a regional mall with a total retail area of approx. 1,334,000 sq. ft. which houses 150+ stores, and is surrounded by numerous retail centers—with virtually all big box retailers being represented—providing numerous restaurant options as well as various fitness options. Also adjacent to the property is Sesame Place, a children’s theme park featuring every type of family attraction—water rides, shows, parades and rides— where guests can meet one of the Sesame Street characters. -
Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Service Plan
FISCAL YEAR 2019 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN Service Planning Department April 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN TIMELINE 2 I. SUMMARY AND LIST OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 3 II. ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN PROCESS 5 III. EVALUATION PROCESS 6 IV. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 8 V. NON-RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 10 VI. POST-IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW OF PRIOR YEAR’S CHANGES 11 VII. ANNUAL ROUTE AND STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 13 APPENDICES 15 PROJECT MAPS 16 PROJECT COSTS/REVENUE SUMMARY CHARTS 45 COMMUNITY BENEFIT ANALYSIS COMPUTATIONS 51 ANNUAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE REVIEW 61 City Transit 63 Suburban Transit 65 Contract Operations 66 ANNUAL STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 67 City Transit 68 Suburban Transit 70 Regional Rail Division 74 Regional Rail Stations 75 INTRODUCTION The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is pleased to present its Annual Service Plan (ASP) for Fiscal Year 2019. This document describes the service proposals suggested by the general public, government agencies, elected officials and Authority staff, and presents the technical and financial analyses that determine whether the proposals merit implementation. The Plan includes projects for City Transit and Suburban Transit. There are no proposals for Regional Rail. This year marks the 21st Annual Service Plan and its associated planning process. This and the previous efforts reflect SEPTA’s ongoing commitment to improve the performance and productivity of transit routes and regional rail lines through careful measurement of both ridership changes and operating cost based upon a numeric scoring methodology. This method, fully described for each proposal, includes measures for revenues, operating costs, and impacts to existing riders. Additionally, each proposal must meet minimum performance standards, adopted by the SEPTA Board, prior to review within the service plan process. -
SEPTA Status Updates
DVRPC Approved Projects for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Pennsylvania Transit Projects - SEPTA Status Updates MPMS County Project Title Project Description Amount * Let Date Award Date Award $ Comments 60655 Bucks Intermodal Facility SEPTA intends to provide advanced intermodal station improvements at the Croydon Station, R7 Trenton Line. The $8,500,000 N/A 3/1/2009 $8,018,862 - Improvements (B) (R7 improvements include new high level platforms, expanded parking, and realignment of adjacent street to improve traffic flow. Croydon Regional Rail Station Rehabilitation) 60540 Chester Parking Expansion SEPTA intends to construct a new (90) space parking lot at the Elwyn Station, R3 Media/Elwyn Line, on a parcel of land $1,690,322 7/28/2009 8/26/2009 $856,299 - Program (R3 Elwyn currently owned by the Elwyn Institute. There is currently insufficient parking at this station. Parking) 84643 Chester Malvern Station and SEPTA intends to construct a new pedestrian underpass, new energy efficient lighting, intertrack fencing, and related exterior $12,475,988 N/A N/A $0 - Pedestrian Tunnel improvements at the Malvern Station, R5 Paoli/Thorndale Line, including expansion and improvements to the existing parking Improvements lot. All work will be completed in accordance with ADA requirements. 60557 Delaware System Improvements SEPTA intends to install fiber optic cabling along the Routes 101 &102, MSHL. This will permit installation of Audio Visual $4,890,190 N/A 7/1/2009 $2,818,264 - (Media-Sharon Hill Public Address (AVPA) devices at all passenger stations and improve power substation control. The design work is by Parsons. -
On Track Progress Towards Transit-Oriented Development in The
Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. -
May 2009,Vol
May 2009,Vol. 38, No. 5 Manager’s Corner Andy Lamas: by Glenn Bergman, General Manager Good Neighbor I had the opportunity to spend 10 days in Berkeley, California, visiting family (new Locally & Globally baby additions to the family), babysitting, featured Speaker at Spring visiting food markets and farmers’ markets, General Membership Meeting and spending 90 minutes with Alice Waters PHOTO as she showed me around the Edible COURTESY Schoolyard program at Berkley’s Martin Luther King Junior High School. I left her OF with pictures of our co-op farm education B READ program, the Martin Luther King High & R School program, and a picture of the MLK OSES students and WW team with Mayor Nutter. C She loved the CSA Saul School program-- OMMUNITY “Henry Got Crops”--and the idea of kids F working with professionals selling shares in UND an urban farm project. At the Edible School Yard, I saw part (continued on page 6) Shuttle Expands Weavers Way Goes Green at Cliveden Community PHOTO BY Andy Lamas B Coverage, ONNIE by Chris P. Kaiser H AY Andy Lamas has been a good neighbor Distribution for many years, not only to Mt. Airy, but to by Jonathan McGoran, Shuttle Editor the entire Philadelphia region as well. He is Starting with the April 2009 issue of a professor at the University of Pennsylva- the Shuttle, we have expanded our coverage nia with a primary appointment in urban of the broader community and also ex- studies, where he focuses on social justice panded our distribution. We have increased and economic democracy in the context of the number of places where the Shuttle is urbanization. -
Historic Districts in Philadelphia
HISTORIC DISTRICTS IN PHILADELPHIA An assessment of existing information and recommendations for future action January 9, 2007 CRCG # 06-094-01 Emily T. Cooperman, Ph.D., Project Manager Cory Kegerise, M.S., Principal Investigator HISTORIC DISTRICTS IN PHILADELPHIA An assessment of existing information and recommendations for future action January 9, 2007 CRCG # 06-094-01 Emily T. Cooperman, Ph.D., Project Manager Cory Kegerise, M.S., Principal Investigator Prepared for: Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia 1616 Walnut St., Suite 1620 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Prepared by: Cultural Resource Consulting Group 1500 Walnut St., Suite 702 Philadelphia, PA 19102 This report has been supported in part by a grant from the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission Philadelphia Historic Resource Survey Inventory Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia Philadelphia, Pennsylvania CONTENTS Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................1 1.0 STUDY PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND METHODS......................................................... 2 2.0 HISTORIC DISTRICTS IN PHILADELPHIA ..............................................................7 3.0 THE IDENTIFICATION AND DESIGNATION OF HISTORIC DISTRICTS IN PHILADELPHIA......................................................................................................25 4.0 CONCLUSIONS.....................................................................................................34 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ..........................................................................................36 -
Delaware Canal State Park
ǭȱ іљђȱ юџјђџȱ џюіљѕђюёȱѐѐђѠѠȱ юћёȱ џюіљȱ ќѤћѠ ȱȱǭȱ 59 39 31 29 25 ȱǭȱȱȱ ȱ ȱ ȱȱǯȱ New Hope S e SHOPPING cond S Main St 9 miles to Rosemont ȱȱȱ Town of New Hope D Uhlerstown St 611 Northampton St e Bull Lockatong Creek l ȱȱȱȱ www.dcnr.state.pa.us As a destination for artists, musicians, writers and others Island Raven a Quarry Rd Rock Rd w Ĝȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱ seeking a respite from daily life, New Hope provides a ȱ DISTRICT Pine St a R iv r e ȱȱȱ ȱȱ www.fodc.org ȱ¢ǯȱȱȱȱȱęȱȱ Easton ScoĴ e r R ȱȱ ȱǭȱ treasures, delectable meals and refreshing drinks in the shops, Park R d Ferry St Si i 32 29 D&R Trail Stockton tg v D ȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱ ǯĴǯ restaurants and pubs along Main Street and tucked into side e e l a 29 rea Rd w a r e R Prallsville Easton r ll i v e r Hi ȱȱ ȱȱȱ¢ streets and alleys. As evening sets in, music pours into the ȱ ve en D& re Lumberville L Trail s S G Th 20 miles to Rd Rd Hendrick ȱȱȱ¢ www.septa.org streets, the curtain goes up at the iconic Bucks County Larry Holmes Dr ge xson Prallsville t a D ir Sugan Rd a P Uhlerstown it e Island d S m Mills Ar l . ȱȱȱ Playhouse, and energy surges through the town. Dam Ca N Main St t na ail l Sta ȱ ȱȱȱ ȱ ǯ ǯ Tr te L Del. -
Fiscal Year 2017 Annual Service Plan
FISCAL YEAR 2017 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN Service Planning Department 2016 DRAFT COPY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN TIMELINE 2 I. SUMMARY AND LIST OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES 3 II. ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN PROCESS 4 III. EVALUATION PROCESS 5 IV. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 7 V. NON-RECOMMENDED PROJECTS 8 VI. POST-IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW OF PRIOR YEAR’S CHANGES 21 VII. ANNUAL ROUTE AND STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 26 APPENDICES 28 PROJECT MAPS 29 PROJECT COSTS/REVENUE SUMMARY CHARTS 36 COMMUNITY BENEFIT ANALYSIS COMPUTATIONS 39 ANNUAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE REVIEW 42 City Transit 44 Suburban Transit 46 Contract Operations 47 ANNUAL STATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW 48 City Transit 49 Suburban Transit 64 Regional Rail Division 68 Regional Rail Stations 73 INTRODUCTION The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is pleased to present its Annual Service Plan (ASP) for Fiscal Year 2017. This document describes the service proposals suggested by the general public, government agencies, elected officials and Authority staff, and presents the technical and financial analyses that determine whether the proposals merit implementation. The Plan includes projects for City Transit and Suburban Transit. There are no proposals for Regional Rail. This year marks the 19th Annual Service Plan and its associated planning process. This and the previous efforts reflect SEPTA’s ongoing commitment to improve the performance and productivity of transit routes and regional rail lines through careful measurement of both ridership changes and operating cost based upon a numeric scoring methodology. This method, fully described for each proposal, includes measures for revenues, operating costs, and impacts to existing riders. Additionally, each proposal must meet minimum performance standards, adopted by the SEPTA Board, prior to review within the service plan process.