DOCSLIB.ORG

Train Station Relocation Feasibility Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Train Station Relocation Feasibility Study Prepared for: Upper Moreland Township In Partnership with: DVRPC SEPTA Montgomery County ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Upper Moreland Township Revitalization Task Force DVRPC Karen Houck, Chairperson David Anderson Marian Hull, Township Revitalization Coordinator Robert B. Crippen SEPTA Jonathan de Jonge Byron Comati Jerry DiMarzio Jody Holton Charles Gallub Jo Ann Stover Lance Ginsburg David T. Joss MONTGOMERY COUNTY Joseph Lavalle Wes Ratko Dennis Sakelson Michael Narcowich Brian Shannon Dick Sayer Ralph Storti Others Jack Tarman Gregory T. Rogerson Thomas M. Winterberg Arthur Adams Commissioners Kevin C. Spearing Clifton (Kip) McFatridge Township Staff David A. Dodies, Manager A Catalyst for Sustainable Transit Oriented Development TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 Study Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 The Goals Guiding the Study ..................................................................................................................... 4 An Introduction to SEPTA’s Warminster Line Service ............................................................................... 7 Feasibility Study Process ......................................................................................................................... 10 2. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ................................................................................................ 12 Revitalization Task Force – Steering Committee Meetings .................................................................... 13 Public Meetings ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Technical Review Meetings ..................................................................................................................... 16 Public Study Partners .............................................................................................................................. 17 Additional Stakeholder Interaction ......................................................................................................... 18 3. WILLOW GROVE CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT .......................................................... 19 Station Context ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Issues and Opportunities ........................................................................................................................ 23 Market and Real Estate Analysis ............................................................................................................. 30 4. STATION RELOCATION CONCEPTS .......................................................................... 34 Concept Identification ............................................................................................................................. 34 Concept Evaluation ................................................................................................................................. 44 5. STATION DESIGN CONCEPTS AND CAPITAL PROGRAM ELEMENTS ............... 50 Station Design Concepts ......................................................................................................................... 50 Capital Program Elements ....................................................................................................................... 58 6. IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING .................................................................................. 60 Near‐Term Investments .......................................................................................................................... 61 Mid‐Term Investments ............................................................................................................................ 66 July 2012 Page i A Catalyst for Sustainable Transit Oriented Development Long‐Term Investments .......................................................................................................................... 69 7. FISCAL / ECONOMIC ANALYSIS .................................................................................. 72 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 72 TOD Scenarios Modeled and Key Assumptions ...................................................................................... 78 Financial Analysis Findings ...................................................................................................................... 80 Additional Commentary .......................................................................................................................... 86 Fiscal Impact Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 88 8. PUBLIC FUNDING SOURCE IDENTIFICATION ....................................................... 97 Grant Programs ....................................................................................................................................... 98 Other Financing Techniques ................................................................................................................. 100 TABLE OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1‐1: Initial Study Area and Station Relocation Focus Area ........................................................... 2 Exhibit 1‐2: Previous Planning Studies ..................................................................................................... 4 Exhibit 1‐3: Overarching Willow Grove Revitalization Goals Applicable to this Study ............................ 5 Exhibit 1‐4: Revitalization Task Force Goal Survey at Beginning of Study ............................................... 6 Exhibit 1‐5: SEPTA Warminster Line Overview and Willow Grove Alignment Detail .............................. 8 Exhibit 1‐6: Warminster Line Ridership ................................................................................................... 9 Exhibit 1‐7: Feasibility Planning Process ................................................................................................ 10 Exhibit 2‐1: Study Timeline of Outreach Events ..................................................................................... 12 Exhibit 2‐2: Study Stakeholders ............................................................................................................. 18 Exhibit 2‐3: Individual Interviews Conducted During the Study ............................................................ 18 Exhibit 3‐1: Upper Moreland Land Uses in Vicinity of the Willow Grove Station .................................. 20 Exhibit 3‐2: Existing Station Area Photos ............................................................................................... 21 Exhibit 3‐3: Willow Grove Station – Surroundings and Statistics........................................................... 22 Exhibit 3‐4: South Davisville Block Photos ............................................................................................. 24 Exhibit 3‐5: Current Willow Grove Train Station ¼‐mile Walk Distance ................................................ 26 Exhibit 3‐6: Proposed South Davisville Block Train Station ¼‐mile Walk Distance ................................ 26 Exhibit 4‐1: Station Overview Locations ................................................................................................ 35 July 2012 Page ii A Catalyst for Sustainable Transit Oriented Development Exhibit 4‐2: Location Selection Rationale and Site Specific Context Issues ...................................... 35‐36 Exhibit 4‐3: Concept A1 Overview and Sketch Details ........................................................................... 38 Exhibit 4‐4: Concept A2 Overview and Sketch Details ........................................................................... 39 Exhibit 4‐5: Concept B1 Overview and Sketch Details ........................................................................... 40 Exhibit 4‐6: Concept B2 Overview and Sketch Details ........................................................................... 41 Exhibit 4‐7: Concept C1 Overview and Sketch Details ........................................................................... 42 Exhibit 4‐8: Concept C2 Overview and Sketch Details ........................................................................... 43 Exhibit 4‐9: Evaluation Screening Process ............................................................................................. 44 Exhibit 4‐10: Station Concept Evaluation Matrix .............................................................................. 46‐48 Exhibit 5‐1: Refined Station Concept Elements ..................................................................................... 51 Exhibit 5‐2: Potential Grove Siding Track Reconfiguration .................................................................... 56 Exhibit 5‐3: Estimated Project Costs for the Willow Grove Station Redevelopment Concept .............. 59 Exhibit 6‐1: Estimated Near Term Costs for the Willow Grove Station Redevelopment Concept .......
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transportation Improvement Program and FY2015-2026 Twelve-Year Program
    FY2015-2026 TIP/TWELVE-YEAR PROJECT LISTING MPMS PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION MPMS PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION 14698 US 422 Roadway reconstruction (M2B). 73214 Ardmore Transit Center, high-level platforms, ADA, lighting, 16150 Tookany Cr. Pkwy. over Tookany Cr. shelters, signs, paving. 16214 PA 611 over SEPTA; replace state bridge. 74813 Ambler Pedestrian Sidewalk Improvements. 16216 Pennswood Rd. over Amtrak; replace local bridge. 74815 Upper Gwynedd curb & sidewalk reconstruction. 16239 New Hanover Sq. Rd. over Swamp Cr.; replace state bridge. 74817 PA 263 Hatboro Corridor safety improvements. 16248 Union Ave. over rail; replace local bridge. 74937 Whitemarsh Township Improvements; new curb, bumpouts, ADA ramps, ped x-ings. 16334 PA 73 at Greenwood Ave.; improve intersection. 77183 Conshohocken station improvements, high-level platforms; con- 16396 Church Rd. over NHSL; replace bridge. struct parking garage. 16400 Arcola Rd. over Perkiomen Cr.; replace county bridge. 77183 Modernize Hatboro station, improve accessibility. 16408 Fruitville Rd. over Perkiomen Cr.; replace county bridge. 77183 Jenkintown station, improve station building; high-level plat- FY2015-2018 16484 Edge Hill Rd. over PA 611; replace state bridge. forms, ADA accessibility. 16577 Ridge Pk. reconstruct, widen & upgrade signals Butler Pk. to Phila. 77183 Roslyn Station Improvements, modernize station; provide im- proved accessibility. 16599 PA 320 reconstruct & widen btw Arden & U. Gulph Rds. Transportation Improvement Program 77183 Willow Grove Station Improvements; to station building, high- 16610 Ashmead Rd. over Tookany Cr.; replace local bridge. level platforms, ADA accessibility. 16658 Old Forty Ft. Rd. over Skippack Cr.; replace state bridge. 77211 PA 309 Connector (Ph. 2), new road from Allentown Rd. and FY2015-2026 Twelve-Year Program 16705 Chester Valley Trail Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options
    Advocacy Sustainability Partnerships Fort Washington Office Park Transportation Demand Management Plan Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options Prepared by GVF GVF July 2017 Contents Executive Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ArcMap Geocoding and Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 6 Travel Times Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 7 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Employee Commuter Survey Results ................................................................................................ 7 2. Office Park Companies Outreach Results ......................................................................................... 7 3. Office Park
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Review of Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning Studies
    APPENDIX A: REVIEW OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PLANNING STUDIES This appendix provides an overview of previous planning efforts undertaken in and around Philadelphia that are relevant to the Plan. These include city initiatives, plans, studies, internal memos, and other relevant documents. This appendix briefly summarizes each previous plan or study, discusses its relevance to pedestrian and bicycle planning in Philadelphia, and lists specific recommendations when applicable. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE PLAN APRIL 2012 CONTENTS WALKING REPORTS AND STUDIES .......................................................................................................................... 1 Walking in Philadelphia ............................................................................................................................................ 1 South of South Walkabilty Plan................................................................................................................................. 1 North Broad Street Pedestrian Crash Study .............................................................................................................. 2 North Broad Street Pedestrian Safety Audit ............................................................................................................. 3 Pedestrian Safety and Mobility: Status and Initiatives ............................................................................................ 3 Neighborhood/Area Plans and Studies .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Torresdale-Cottman to Fern Rock Transportation Center
    A ®SEPT 28ective September 1, 2019 Eff Torresdale-Cottman to Fern Rock Transportation Center Serving Tacony and Fox Chase Customer Service 215-580-7800 TDD/TTY 215-580-7853 www.septa.org W est Av G St Basil Bustleton Whitman re 24 O O d e Huntingdon W nw v C C Square S. C. R Academy Krewstown o od Av wn Rd elsh Rd F Valley S. C. Y A k ox R I Plaza r C H Northeast o h H E wsto Grant A Y Rockledge P v a u M A s Cedar A L d Philadelphia n O l Jenkintown t e erree Rd Kre v s Rd t G E V O e rr i T AD Pennypack Airport Salus Manor Fo ng N IL To 77 d O H Park v Northeast University w Jenkinto Manor Hollywood on ns M P hip College Pk S. C. Lin e R velt Blvd Blue Grass Rd d v 232 Fox Chase A wn Rd 611 r Pine RdRha e wn Bustleton A Blue Grass d S Roose Ashton Rd C la 77 FOX CHASE t 67 v hurch Rd a S. C. w To STATION Willits Rd d wnship Line Rd 18 Ogontz a 1 C Jeanes Elkins Park Moss Rehab 24 Algon A Church RdHospital O v Plaza x H erree Rd Spring A Einstein at Elkins f v a o V Gloria Dei 19 s Fox Chase r C Park Chu b d High r Rd elsh v c r h h R o 67 Estates 14 Nazareth u Cancer Center o A r d W c k Soll hool Rd h v Castor A 58 d 19 Sc A Montgomer R Elkins Park 59 y A Hospital Ashton Rd v 1 H v t Central A v v ELKINS a A S r n kany kw Holme A so Too P RYERS Rha H r i y The Shoppes o PARK lm d k wn St e A C r e Av n e STATION at Rhawnhurst 59 STATION v 50 o 20 d c y Ashbourne Rd Burholme e R Northeast Rhawnhurst S Holme v CHELTENHAM Cottman A k A r Union w H.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal Passenger System Survey, Phase III Date Published June 2004 a Working Document Publication No
    JUNE 2004 intermodal passenger system survey phaseiii A WORKING DOCUMENT DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Roosevelt Boulevard Section 1 – Appendix 1
    Roosevelt Boulevard Section 1 – Appendix 1 Previous Studies Review March 2016 This page intentionally left blank Task 1.C Review of Previous Studies Roosevelt Boulevard Route for Change Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................................................... i City of Philadelphia Plans 1. Philadelphia 2035 Citywide Vision (2011, Philadelphia City Planning Commission) .............. 1 Study Purpose and Highlights ........................................................................................................ 1 Plan Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 2 Public Involvement Process ...........................................................................................................11 Relevance to Route for Change Program ......................................................................................11 2. Lower Northeast District Plan (2012, Philadelphia City Planning Commission) ................... 15 Study Purpose and Highlights ...................................................................................................... 15 Plan Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 16 Frankford Transportation Center ............................................................................................. 17 Frankford Gateway .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Horace Trumbauer: a Life in Architecture
    THE PennsylvanialMagazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Horace Trumbauer: A Life in Architecture IXT ITHIN MONTHS after g legal age, Horace Trumbauer pened his architectural office in Philadelphia. Before he died V in his native city nearly ha a century later, he had brought forth well over a thousand works. Remembered best for his mansions, he in fact devised buildings and alterations of virtually every size and purpose. Most stand in Philadelphia or its suburbs, although structures north to Maine and south to Florida, west to Colorado and east to England make him far from a local architect. While he had many gifted employees, their purpose was to carry out his intentions. Today he ranks as Phiadelphia's representative among the top tier of American architects of the Gilded Age. His life was dosely interwoven with the opulent era of architecture through which he lived. Born soon after the Civil War, the boy grew up in a nation freshly emerged as a world power, whose architects cast aside regional customs in favor of historic styles firmly within the European mainstream. Europe's own use of such styles had grown overly mannered so that the United States now led in architecture no less than in industry. First fruits of this period were still arising when Horace quit school at age fourteen to apprentice at an architectural firm. Going on his own in 1890, the twenty-one-year-old won instant approval from prosperous clients. Chief THE PENNSYLVANIA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Vol. CXXV,No. 4 (October 2001) FREDERICK PLAIT October celebrities of the era were its tycoons, and almost at once he began erecting immense residences for them.
    [Show full text]
  • DVRPC Approved Projects for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 New Jersey Highway Projects (Local) Status Updates
    DVRPC Approved Projects for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 New Jersey Highway Projects (Local) Status Updates DBNUM County Project Title Project Description ARRA Amount * Let Date Award Date Award $ Comments FSD09698 Burlington Resurfacing Program, Milling 2" of surface course and resurfacing milled area with 2" of pavement at four locations: Marne Highway, from Hartford $2,500,000 N/A N/A $0 Funding authorized Burlington County Road to Mt. Holly Bypass; Old York Road, from CR 543 to CR 678 and from CR 545 to CR 677, and Jacksonville-Hedding Road, from CR 660 to CR 543 . All work will be done within the existing county Right of way. The relocation of the existing utilities will not be required. Also, the milling and resurfacing will occur within the existing pavement. This project combines the following 3 ARRA projects: FSD09483, FSD09484, and FSD09485. FSD09697 Burlington Traffic Signal Coordinate and upgrade fifteen intersections on Sunset Road, Levitt Parkway, and JFK Way in Burlington Township and $5,500,000 N/A N/A $0 Funding authorized Upgrade & Willingboro Township, and 8 existing signalized intersections on CR 541/Stokes Road in Medford Township and Medford Coordination, Lakes Borough. The fifteen intersections on Sunset Road, Levitt Parkway, and JFK Way will be coordinated and added to the Burlington County existing Traffic Signal Coordination System. The existing 8 signal system on Sunset Road, Levitt Parkway, and JFK Way uses radio frequencies which will be replaced with fiber optics and will be coordinated with the existing Signal Coordination System in the County and operated from the County's Traffic Operations Center This project will provide traffic signal coordination for improved vehicle progression; detect and report traffic signal malfunctions, and automatically collect and archive traffic data.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Support
    Implementation SupportPart A Developing Supplemental Transit Service for the 611 Corridor MARCH 2013 The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is dedicated to uniting the region’s elected officials, planning professionals, and the public with a common vision of making a great region even greater. Shaping the way we live, work, and play, DVRPC builds consensus on improving transportation, promoting smart growth, protecting the environment, and enhancing the economy. We serve a diverse region of nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. DVRPC is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Greater Philadelphia Region — leading the way to a better future. The symbol in our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for the findings and conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster Train Station Master Plan Which Is a Product of the Lancaster County Planning Commission and Funded by Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
    Lancaster Train Station Master Plan October 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... i Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Current and On-Going Station Improvements ......................................................................... 1 Planning Horizons ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Physical Plant ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Maintenance .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Station Capital Improvements ............................................................................................................... 9 Available Non-Transportation Spaces ................................................................................................ 17 Station Artwork ................................................................................................................................... 19 Historic Preservation ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Willow Grove Park Association Collection
    Guide to the Willow Grove Park Association Collection NMAH.AC.0362 Vanessa Broussard-Simmons 1989 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 3 Willow Grove Park Association Collection NMAH.AC.0362 Collection Overview Repository: Archives Center, National Museum of American History Title: Willow Grove Park Association Collection Identifier: NMAH.AC.0362 Date: 1910, 1929 Creator: Willow Grove Park Association (Creator) National Museum of American History (U.S.). Division of Community Life (Collector) Cayton, Howard (Collector)
    [Show full text]
  • Willow Grove and Doylestown to Olney Transportation Center
    August 29, 2021 55 Willow Grove and Doylestown to Olney Transportation Center Serving Jenkintown 30 Minutes MAX This Route Runs Weekdays 30 Every 30 minutes or less 15 15 hours per day (6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.) 5 5 days per week (Monday thru Friday) By Doylestown be 313 d 611 263 rry R Willow R Airport Easton Rd d Cross Keys Place n UPS o Blair Mill Rd Grove t Dresher Rd Shopping Center s Turnpike Dr a Moravian 63 onic Dr E 311 Willow Grove Horsham Museum Electr Industrial DOYLESTOWN Swamp Rd Gate Commons 310 Willow Rd 95 n 611 Bucks County Grove Pointe w W W to eekdelsha Rd r ork Rd Courthouse e Y y at Main St t y State S s Onl zw s Onl 63 it 263 visville yRd Doylestown F t St y Moreland Rd Da Hospital 276 eekda t Connections at W te S Cour 202 22 ta Doylestown 80 S Station: DOYLESTOWN Easton Rd WILLOW GROVE Doylestown Willow Grove R Parkd 22 wn d STATION “rushbus” to v STATION Mall er A R 311at v k Moreland Rd 611 Do zw A r it 310 Center ork Rd Willow o ylesto F Y Dick’s MorelandPark Rd Y Bypass 95 d wn Grove l urk Rd York O T Park Easton Rd Easton Rd 202 Wells Rd Mall e Hill Rd Primark Edg Bloomingdales 310 611 55 h Rd Edison Furlong Rd 63 Wels 22 d Ol R d W lle e vi Atrium ls is h R Easton Rd v Bucks County d Da Mall S.
    [Show full text]