DOCSLIB.ORG

AFGHANISTAN MONTHLY IDP UPDATE 01 – 31 December 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AFGHANISTAN MONTHLY IDP UPDATE 01 – 31 December 2014 HIGHLIGHTS --- -------------------- ---------------- - Region end-Nov 2014 Increase Decrease end-Dec 2014 South 210,210 - - 210,210 KEY FIGURES West 197,725 5,440 - 203,165 . East 135,670 3,366 - 139,036 23,247 individuals displaced by conflict were profiled during North 102,682 2,121 - 104,803 December 2014, of whom: Central 117,513 12,076 - 129,589 5,174 individuals were Southeast 18,328 195 - 18,523 displaced in December 2014; Central Highlands 34 49 - 83 14,369 in November 2014; Total 782,162 23,247 - 805,409 1,616 in October 2014; and The major causes of displacement were military operations conducted by Afghan 2,088 earlier. Security National Forces (ANSF), armed conflict between Anti Governmental . The total number of profiled Elements (AGEs) and ANSF, as well as harassment and intimidation of civilians by IDPs as of end September 2014 AGEs, which included threatening the families and tribes of those affiliated with the Government, and forcing civilians to provide them with accommodation, food and is 805,409 individuals. money. Other causes included, general insecurity in some districts (particularly in Disaggregated data for western region), including criminal activities such as targeted killings and September profiled: 52 % male kidnappings; and inter-tribal armed clashes which negatively affected the normal live and 48% female; 39% adults of communities and contributed to general insecurity. and 61% children. Primary needs: The primary needs profiled was food, NFIs and winterization assistance, followed by cash grants. PARTNERSHIPS Assistance overview: 1,220 IDP families profiled in December were assisted with food by WFP, while 2,098 families with NFIs by UNHCR, NRC, DRC and IRC, 501 The National IDP Task Force is families with cash grants by NRC and DRC, 932 families with sanitary kits and 511 chaired by the Ministry of families with solar lamps by UNHCR. Refugees and Repatriation Winterization assistance: distributed in December to 2,858 IDP families, who were (MoRR) and co-chaired by profiled not only in December 2014, but also earlier during the year. UNHCR; it is linked to the Challenges: Lack of access to verify displacement and respond to immediate needs Afghanistan Protection Cluster. of IDPs continues to be a significant challenge for IDP Task Force agencies. In cases, Regional IDP Task Forces are where other actors, not part of the IDP task forces, have reached out to assist IDPs – present in Jalalabad, Herat, if the numbers are not verified by the IDP Task forces, then they are not included in Mazar, Kandahar and Kabul. our IDP data system. The Regional IDP Task Actual displacement trend from January 2012 up to December 2014 Forces verify and assess new displacements, and also coordinate and respond to IDPs' immediate emergency. The dots in the graph show the number of actual displacement in the month IDPs (internally displaced persons) are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular, as a result of, or in order to, avoid the effects of armed conflict, situation of generalized violence, violations of human rights or natural or human made disasters, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized state border. (Refer: Section 3.1, Afghanistan National IDP Policy, November 2013). 1 UNHCR Afghanistan – Monthly IDP Update for December 2014 PROTECTION SNAPSHOT OF DISPLACEMENT IN 10 TOP PROVINCES -------------- ----- -- Top 10 Provinces Where the highest number of IDPs have been IDPs are living in the houses of their relatives and the profiled in the reporting month host community. A joint assessment of the IDPs was Province Families Individuals conducted by UNHCR Partner (ORCD) and DoRR. IDP Kabul 1,020 6,120 task force is coordinating to make sure IDPs receive the Ghazni 502 3,556 basic assistances soon. Badghis 396 2,209 Badghis Kunar 354 2,024 Farah 324 1,930 396 families (2,209 Individuals) were displaced from Nangarhar 231 1,244 Qadis, Abkamary, Muqur Ghurmach, Jawand, Bala Kapisa 176 1,090 Murghab and Nili chaghcharan districts of Ghor and Herat 245 1,035 Badghis provinces to Qala Naw city, the provincial Logar 134 982 center of Badghis. The actual displacement occurred in Kunduz 139 776 late November/early December 2014. IDPs are living in rented houses, close to the city, where they have access There were smaller displacements profiled in Faryab, Sar-i-Pul, Jawzjan, to the market and social services including, health and Samangan, Baghlan, Badakhshan, Laghman, Ghor and Maidan Wardak provinces, for which the details are available on our website. education. Joint initial assessment was conducted by DoRR, UNHCR partner (ARAA), NRC and IRC. The main Kabul reasons of displacements were armed conflict between AGEs and ANSF, general insecurity, inter-tribal disputes, 1,020 families (6,120 individuals) were displaced from and intimidation and harassment by AGEs including, Tagab district of Kapisa province to Kabul city, in late illegal taxation. The entire group was recommended for November/early December. According to the IDPs, NFI and cash assistance, and 307 families were Tagab district has a strong AGEs presence which has led recommended for food. Provision of assistance, by the to expansion of the military operations by the ANSF. IDP task force, will take place soon. Military operations coupled with harassment and intimidation by AGEs (including forced recruitment and Kunar illegal taxation) were reported as the major causes of displacement. The majority of IDPs are currently living 354 families (2,024 individuals) were displaced from with their relatives and the host community, and some Dangam district of Kunar to Asmar, Asadabad and Shigal live in rented houses. They have access to social services districts of the same province in December 2014. They available in the city including, health and education. The were displaced due to armed conflict between ANSF and initial assessment was carried out by UNHCR partner AGEs, in and around their villages which commenced (ORCD), CHA and DoRR Kabul. IDP task force is according to IDPs when, AGEs attacked the ALP with coordinating to make sure IDPs receive the basic heavy weapons in mid-December. As a result of the assistance soon. armed conflict, civilian casualties and damages to civilian houses have occurred, it is alleged. IDPs were Ghazni jointly assessed by UNHCR IP (ODCG), DRC, NRC, WFP and DoRR. Food and NFIs were the main needs 502 families (3,556 individuals) were displaced from identified. All families received NFIs and food, 255 Nahor, Jaghato, Qarabagh, Khuja Omari, Dey yak and families received cash assistance and meanwhile all the Giro districts of Ghazni province to Ghazni city, the families received winterization assistance, sanitary kits provincial center of Ghazni, in late November/early and solar lamps. December 2014. The major reason of displacement was military operations/ad-hoc encounters between ANSF Farah and AGEs. In addition, mysterious targeted killing of health workers and civil servants added to the insecurity 324 families (1,930) individuals were displaced from in the community; and increasingly limited presence of Bala Buluk, Pusht-e-Rod, and Khak-e-Safid districts of service providers for education and heath due to the Farah province, and Murghab district of Badghis insecurity, were also push factors which prompted the province to Farah city, the provincial center of Farah. flight. The actual displacement occurred in November 2014. IDPs were assessed jointly by DoRR, UNHCR’s partner United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) – www.unhcr.af 2 UNHCR Afghanistan – Monthly IDP Update for December 2014 (VARA), and WFP partner (PAT). The major reasons of Herat displacements were reported as, armed conflict between AGEs and ALP, which occurred from mid to late 245 families (1,035 individuals) were displaced from November in the above-mentioned districts of Farah Moqor, Qadis, Bala Murghab and Ghormach districts of Province; while the families coming from Badghis Badghis and Dolaina, Shahrak and Firuz Koh districts of Province were displaced because of general insecurity Ghor and Nawah district of Helmand, to Herat city, the including target killings, kidnappings and AGE threats to provincial center of Herat province. The displacements those affiliated with the government. Out of 324 occurred on different occasions, from September to families, 283 were found to be in need of food and NFIs December 2014. The main reasons for displacement and were assisted. In addition, 150 of the most were general insecurity including target killings, vulnerable families received winterization assistance kidnappings and AGE threats to those affiliated with the from UNHCR. government and armed conflicts between AGEs and Nangarhar ANSFs. NFIs, winterization assistance and cash grants were distributed to 104 families, while distribution to the remaining families will take place soon by the IDP 231 families (1,244 individuals) were displaced from task force. Chapahar, Khogyani, Archi, Deh Bala and Batikot districts of Nangarhar, Dangam district of Kunar and Zurmat Logar district of Paktiya to Bihsud, Surkhrod and Kama districts of Nangarhar province. The displacements happened on 134 families (982 individuals) were displaced from different occasions from May to December 2014. IDPs Baraki Barak, Charkh, Kharwar and Khoshi districts of were jointly assessed by UNHCR and its partner (APA), Logar to Pul-e-Alam city, the provincial center of Logar NRC, WFP, DoRR and NRC. Armed conflict between in December 2014. The main reasons for displacement ANSF and AGEs, as well as harassment and intimidation were armed conflict between AGEs and ANSF, clean-up of civilians by the AGEs (e.g. threatening those affiliated military operations and intimidation and harassment of with the government and illegal taxation) were reported civilians by AGEs (e.g. illegal taxation and threatening by all the IDP groups as the major cause of those linked to the ALP).
Recommended publications
  • The ANSO Report (16-30 September 2010)

    The ANSO Report (16-30 September 2010)

    The Afghanistan NGO Safety Office Issue: 58 16-30 September 2010 ANSO and our donors accept no liability for the results of any activity conducted or omitted on the basis of this report. THE ANSO REPORT -Not for copy or sale- Inside this Issue COUNTRY SUMMARY Central Region 2-7 The impact of the elections and Zabul while Ghazni of civilian casualties are 7-9 Western Region upon CENTRAL was lim- and Kandahar remained counter-productive to Northern Region 10-15 ited. Security forces claim extremely volatile. With AOG aims. Rather it is a that this calm was the result major operations now un- testament to AOG opera- Southern Region 16-20 of effective preventative derway in various parts of tional capacity which al- Eastern Region 20-23 measures, though this is Kandahar, movements of lowed them to achieve a unlikely the full cause. An IDPs are now taking place, maximum of effect 24 ANSO Info Page AOG attributed NGO ‘catch originating from the dis- (particularly on perceptions and release’ abduction in Ka- tricts of Zhari and Ar- of insecurity) for a mini- bul resulted from a case of ghandab into Kandahar mum of risk. YOU NEED TO KNOW mistaken identity. City. The operations are In the WEST, Badghis was The pace of NGO incidents unlikely to translate into the most affected by the • NGO abductions country- lasting security as AOG wide in the NORTH continues onset of the elections cycle, with abductions reported seem to have already recording a three fold in- • Ongoing destabilization of from Faryab and Baghlan.
  • (SIKA) – East Final Report

    (SIKA) – East Final Report

    Stability in Key Areas (SIKA) – East Final Report ACKU 2 ACKU Ghazni Province_Khwaja Umari District_Qala Naw Girls School Sport Field (PLAY) opening ceremony ii Stability in Key Areas (SIKA) – East Final Report ACKU The authors’ views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government iii Name of USAID Activity: Afghanistan Stability in Key Areas (SIKA) - East Name of Prime Contractor: AECOM International Development $144,948,162.00 Total funding: Start date: December 7, 2011 Option period: December 3, 2013 End date: September 6, 2015 Geographic locations: Ghazni Province: Andar, Bahrami Shahid, Dih Yak, Khwaja Umari, Qarabagh, and Muqur Khost Province: Gurbuz, Jaji Maidan, Mando Zayi, Tani, and Nadir Shah Kot Logar Province: Baraki Barak, Khoshi, and Mohammad Agha Maydan Wardak Province: Chaki Wardak, Jalrez, Nirkh, Saydabad and Maydan Shahr Paktya Province: Ahmad Abad, Laja Ahmad Khail, Laja Mangal, Zadran, Garda Serai, Zurmat, Ali Khail, Mirzaka, and Sayed Karam Paktika Province: Sharan and Yosuf Khel Overall goals and objectives: SIKA – East promotes stabilization in key areas by supporting GIRoA at the district level, while coordinating efforts at the provincial level to implement community led development and governance initiatives that respond to the population’s needs and concerns to build confidence, promote stability, and increase the provision of basic services. • Address Instability and Respond to Concerns: Provincial and District Entities increasingly address Expected Results: sources of instability and take measures to respond to the population’s development and governance concerns. • Enable Access to Services: Provincial and District entities understand what organizations and provincial line departments work within their geographic areas, ACKUwhat kind of services they provide, and how the population can access those services.
  • Watershed Atlas Part IV

    Watershed Atlas Part IV

    PART IV 99 DESCRIPTION PART IV OF WATERSHEDS I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED II. AMU DARYA RIVER BASIN III. NORTHERN RIVER BASIN IV. HARIROD-MURGHAB RIVER BASIN V. HILMAND RIVER BASIN VI. KABUL (INDUS) RIVER BASIN VII. NON-DRAINAGE AREAS PICTURE 84 Aerial view of Panjshir Valley in Spring 2003. Parwan, 25 March 2003 100 I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED Part IV of the Watershed Atlas describes the 41 watersheds Graphs 21-32 illustrate the main characteristics on area, popu- defined in Afghanistan, which includes five non-drainage areas lation and landcover of each watershed. Graph 21 shows that (Map 10 and 11). For each watershed, statistics on landcover the Upper Hilmand is the largest watershed in Afghanistan, are presented. These statistics were calculated based on the covering 46,882 sq. km, while the smallest watershed is the FAO 1990/93 landcover maps (Shapefiles), using Arc-View 3.2 Dasht-i Nawur, which covers 1,618 sq. km. Graph 22 shows that software. Graphs on monthly average river discharge curve the largest number of settlements is found in the Upper (long-term average and 1978) are also presented. The data Hilmand watershed. However, Graph 23 shows that the largest source for the hydrological graph is the Hydrological Year Books number of people is found in the Kabul, Sardih wa Ghazni, of the Government of Afghanistan – Ministry of Irrigation, Ghorband wa Panjshir (Shomali plain) and Balkhab watersheds. Water Resources and Environment (MIWRE). The data have Graph 24 shows that the highest population density by far is in been entered by Asian Development Bank and kindly made Kabul watershed, with 276 inhabitants/sq.
  • THE ANSO REPORT -Not for Copy Or Sale

    THE ANSO REPORT -Not for Copy Or Sale

    The Afghanistan NGO Safety Office Issue: 72 16-30 April 2011 ANSO and our donors accept no liability for the results of any activity conducted or omitted on the basis of this report. THE ANSO REPORT -Not for copy or sale- Inside this Issue COUNTRY SUMMARY Central Region 2 The IEA announced the ini- salary lines, banks, demon- A second, equally lethal 5 Northern Region tiation of their ‘Spring Offen- stration, arbakai shura and effective trend that has Western Region 10 sive’ on April 29th, an event meetings and shops but we developed in line with the that occurs an a yearly basis will need to monitor the previous, is the surgical Eastern Region 14 and is generally intended as a target pattern closely to targeting of key leadership Southern Region 20 strategic statement regarding fully understand this scope (military, political, and ci- their goals, methodology, as of this term. When taken in vilian) with suicide attacks. 27 ANSO Info Page well as guidance to their lead- conjunction with the in- Of note, this trend, when ership though is also an ele- struction to deliver coupled with the above, ment of their wider infor- “meticulous military plans” proves to be particular dif- YOU NEED TO KNOW mation operations plan. The however we would stop ficult to mitigate for the operation, known as ‘Badar’, short of seeing it as carte target groups, as seen in • IEA announces spring offen- while short on tactical details, blanche to attack any place the penetration of the sive, Operation Badar contains a few comments of that targets recreate or gath- MoD this period in Kabul.
  • 16 September 2010

    16 September 2010

    SIOC – Afghanistan: UNITED NATIONS CONFIDENTIAL UN Department of Safety and Security, Afghanistan Security Situation Report, Week 37, 10 - 16 September 2010 JOINT WEEKLY SECURITY ANALYSIS The week recorded a further decrease in the overall number of incidents with only the WR recording an increase, while the rest of the regions recording decreased or relatively consistent incident levels. This overall decrease is assessed to be a result of Eid celebrations, which continued for the first three days of the week, as well as AGE’s focus mainly on the elections and related activities and preparation for the offensive on the Election Day. This was manifested in the dramatic increase recorded in the election- related incidents. Lack of visibility in the SR, particularly in Hilmand is another factor contributing to the low numbers recorded in the region. Kunduz remained volatile in the NER, followed by Badakhshan mainly due to increased demonstrations. In the NR violence, mainly connected to the elections, was spread in most of the provinces. In the WR, Farah was the center of focus with increased IED incidents and Kandahar in the CR with a focus of AGE activity in Kandahar City. Uruzgan Province remained susceptible to AGE activity. The decrease in the SER was visible in the whole regions except for Paktika as a result of increasing attacks against the newly deployed surge troops. Kunar Province was the center of AGE activity with over 80% of all the incidents in the region. In the CR, Logar and Wardak remained the most active districts and together accounted for 70% of all the incidents.
  • Daily Situation Report 31 October 2010 Safety and Security Issues Relevant to Sssi Personnel and Clients

    Daily Situation Report 31 October 2010 Safety and Security Issues Relevant to Sssi Personnel and Clients

    Strategic SSI - Afghanistan DAILY SITUATION REPORT 31 OCTOBER 2010 SAFETY AND SECURITY ISSUES RELEVANT TO SSSI PERSONNEL AND CLIENTS STANDING THREAT ASSESSMENT (KABUL): Threat reports continue to indicate that insurgents aspire to conduct coordinated attacks in Kabul City, as such the threat remains extant. Recent threat reporting has also indicated likely reconnaissance of areas and businesses frequented by members of the international community. Although no significant attacks were carried out in Kabul during the recent parliamentary election, or indeed after the event, the recent reduction in physical security in the city may provide insurgents with exploitable opportunities to carry out attacks. Suicide and complex attacks remain the preferred choice for insurgents in order to gain maximum casualties figures and the associated high degree of media attention. It remains possible that insurgents will still seek to undermine the democratic process by conducting high profile attacks when the final results are announced at the end of October. It remains prudent for international agencies in the Kabul area to maintain a high degree of security vigilance. Sporadic IDF attacks in the city centre are to be expected. Any attacks are likely to consist of between one and four 107 mm rockets launched towards the city centre. Incidents of intimidation, executions by insurgents and targeting of government officials are increasing throughout the country. It seems to be a form of revenge by insurgents as they have lost more than 300 insurgent commanders over the past few months due to successful IM/ANSF operations. MAJOR COUNTRY WIDE EVENTS Herat: Influencial local Tribal Leader killed by insurgents Nangarhar: Five attacks against Border Police OPs Helmand: Five local residents murdered Privileged and Confidential This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
  • Groundwater Natural Resources and Quality Concern in Kabul Basin, Afghanistan

    Groundwater Natural Resources and Quality Concern in Kabul Basin, Afghanistan

    Groundwater natural resources and quality concern in Kabul Basin, Afghanistan Scientific Investigation Report in Afghanistan By: M. Hassan Saffi, Hydro geologist Edited by: M.Naim Eqrar Professor of Geosciences faculty, Kabul University June 2011 Paikob-e-Naswar, Wazirabad, PO Box 208, Kabul, Afghanistan Phone: (+93) (020) 220 17 50 Mobile (+93) (0)70 28 82 32 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.dacaar.org i Abstract Historical groundwater level and water quality data in Kabul Basin were reviewed and compared with the data collected recently. The results suggest that the groundwater quality and water level have been improved progressively with urban development, land use, climate change, socio - economic development and frequent drought events. The main impact of these events include; 1) most of the springs and karezes have dried up; 2) decreased annual precipitation; 3) increased serious deterioration of water quality; 4) increased water logging and salinization; 5) declining of water level in excess of recharge trend; 7) increased evaporation and; 6) marshes dried up in several areas of the Basin, leaving salt crust at the surface. The above impacts have resulted in the replacement of surface water by groundwater resources to support socio-economic development. This, however, is basically not possible because of low thickness and productivity of the aquifers. We have done very little to tackle water quality deterioration and serious lowering of the groundwater level due to fragmented institutional arrangements and poor formulation of effective water policies, strategies and regulation for integrated groundwater resources management, development, protection and sustainability. Groundwater natural reserves have been depleted and water quality has deteriorated due to over-exploitation.
  • Afghanistan Monthly Idp Update

    Afghanistan Monthly Idp Update

    AFGHANISTAN MONTHLY IDP UPDATE 01 – 30 November 2014 KEY FIGURES HIGHLIGHTS --- -------------------- ---------------- - . Region end-Oct 2014 Increase Decrease end-Nov 2014 15,617 individuals, displaced by conflict, were profiled South 207,160 3,050 - 210,210 during November 2014, of West 193,439 4,286 - 197,725 whom: East 134,640 1,030 - 135,670 10,138 individuals were North 100,897 1,785 - 102,682 displaced in November; 2,674 in October; 649 in September; Central 112,081 5,432 - 117,513 1,002 in August; 60 in July; 31 Southeast 18,328 - - 18,328 in June; and 1,063 earlier. Central Highlands - 34 - 34 . The total number of profiled Total 766,545 15,617 - 782,162 IDPs as of end November 2014 is 782,162 individuals. The major causes of displacement were the military operations and armed conflict between Anti Governmental Elements (AGEs) and Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF)/Afghan local police. Other causes included harassments by AGEs. Disaggregated data for November profiled: 49 % male The primary needs profiled was food and NFIs, followed by shelter and cash grants. and 51% female; The majority of the profiled IDPs in November were assisted with food and NFIs, 48% adults and 52% children. through the IDP Task Force agencies including DoRR, DRC, NRC, UNHCR, WFP, APA, ODCG, ACF, etc. PARTNERSHIPS Lack of access to verify displacement and respond to immediate needs of IDPs continues to be a significant challenge for IDP Task Force agencies. The National IDP Task Force is The UNHCR led verification of Kabul informal settlements which was planned for chaired by the Ministry of November is completed.
  • Afghanistan: Annual Report 2014

    Afghanistan: Annual Report 2014

    AFGHANISTAN ANNUAL REPORT 2014 PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT © 2014/Ihsanullah Mahjoor/Associated Press United Nations Assistance Mission United Nations Office of the High in Afghanistan Commissioner for Human Rights Kabul, Afghanistan February 2015 Kabul, Afghanistan July 2014 Source: UNAMA GIS January 2012 AFGHANISTAN ANNUAL REPORT 2014 PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN ARMED CONFLICT United Nations Assistance Mission United Nations Office of the High in Afghanistan Commissioner for Human Rights Kabul, Afghanistan February 2015 Photo on Front Cover © 2014/Ihsanullah Mahjoor/Associated Press. Bodies of civilians killed in a suicide attack on 23 November 2014 in Yahyakhail district, Paktika province that caused 138 civilian casualties (53 killed including 21 children and 85 injured including 26 children). Photo taken on 24 November 2014. "The conflict took an extreme toll on civilians in 2014. Mortars, IEDs, gunfire and other explosives destroyed human life, stole limbs and ruined lives at unprecedented levels. The thousands of Afghan children, women and men killed and injured in 2014 attest to failures to protect civilians from harm. All parties must uphold the values they claim to defend and make protecting civilians their first priority.” Nicholas Haysom, United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General in Afghanistan, December 2014, Kabul “This annual report shows once again the unacceptable price that the conflict is exacting on the civilian population in Afghanistan. Documenting these trends should not be regarded
  • Afghanistan Conflict-Induced Internal

    Afghanistan Conflict-Induced Internal

    AFGHANISTAN CONFLICT-INDUCED INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT MONTHLY UPDATE APRIL 2015 KEY FIGURES HIGHLIGHTS OF THE MONTH IDPs assessed /profiled – Monthly activity 22,579 individuals displaced by conflict assessed/profiled in April Region end-Mar 2015 Newly profiled end-Apr 2015 2015 South 217,031 2,717 219,748 Of these: West 208,660 7,649 216,309 50 % displaced in Apr 2015 Central 142,609 6,993 149,602 14 % in Mar 2015 East 143,971 926 144,897 7 % in Feb 2015 North 117,258 3,828 121,086 1 % in Jan 2015 Southeast 20,769 646 21,415 2 % in Dec 2014 Central Highlands 79 0 79 26 % earlier Total 850,377 22,759 873,136 Of these: Note: This table represents the number of IDPs profiled during the month and the cumulative population profiled since 50.5 % male 2002. Figures do not cover areas where displacement cannot be verified due to lack of access. Furthermore, there might 49.5 % female be displacement and return movements that are not accounted for. IDPs reached by other actors are not included in the 61 % children profiling until they are verified by the Task Forces. Age and Gender breakdown of the profiled population End of April around 873,136 IDPs assessed/profiled 60+ 2.9 2.4 years PARTNERSHIP 18-59 20.7 18.7 - National IDP Task Force chaired by years 12-17 the Ministry of Refugees and 9.6 8.8 years Repatriation (MoRR) and co- 5-11 10.7 9.2 chaired by UNHCR. years - Regional IDP Task Forces chaired 0-4 9.4 8.5 by DORR and co-chaired by UNHCR years in Jalalabad, Herat, Mazar, Kandahar and Gardez.
  • Security Council Distr.: General 30 May 2018

    Security Council Distr.: General 30 May 2018

    United Nations S/2018/466 Security Council Distr.: General 30 May 2018 Original: English Letter dated 16 May 2018 from the Chair of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1988 (2011) addressed to the President of the Security Council I have the honour to transmit herewith the ninth report of the Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team established pursuant to resolution 1526 (2004), which was submitted to the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1988 (2011), in accordance with paragraph (a) of the annex to resolution 2255 (2015). I should be grateful if the present letter and the report could be brought to the attention of the Security Council members and issued as a document of the Council. (Signed) Kairat Umarov Chair Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1988 (2011) 18-06956 (E) 050618 *1806956* S/2018/466 Letter dated 30 April 2018 from the Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team addressed to the Chair of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1988 (2011) I have the honour to refer to paragraph (a) of the annex to Security Council resolution 2255 (2015), in which the Council requested the Monitoring Team to submit, in writing, two annual comprehensive, independent reports to the Committee, on implementation by Member States of the measures referred to in paragraph 1 of the resolution, including specific recommendations for improved implementation of the measures and possible new measures. I therefore transmit to you the ninth report of the Monitoring Team, pursuant to the above-mentioned request. The Monitoring Team notes that the original language of the report is English.
  • Resident / Humanitarian Coordinator Report on the Use of CERF Funds

    Resident / Humanitarian Coordinator Report on the Use of CERF Funds

    Resident / Humanitarian Coordinator Report on the use of CERF funds RESIDENT / HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS AFGHANISTAN UNDERFUNDED EMERGENCY ROUND II 2015 RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR Mr. Mark Bowden REPORTING PROCESS AND CONSULTATION SUMMARY a. Please indicate when the After Action Review (AAR) was conducted and who participated. There was no After Action Review conducted due to time constraints and several conflicting priorities. However, the recipient agencies completed the relevant sections for CERF Added Value and Lessons Learnt to facilitate feedback for inclusion in this report. b. Please confirm that the Resident Coordinator and/or Humanitarian Coordinator (RC/HC) Report was discussed in the Humanitarian and/or UN Country Team and by Cluster/sector coordinators as outlined in the guidelines. YES NO There were several delays encountered for the completion of this report by the Humanitarian Financing Unit (HFU) of United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in Afghanistan, including the submission of inputs by the recipient agencies and to the priorities for the management of the Common Humanitarian Fund (CHF). This did not allow for sufficient time for wider sharing with the Humanitarian Country Team (HCT) members. However, the final version will be shared with HCT members for their reference. c. Was the final version of the RC/HC Report shared for review with in-country stakeholders as recommended in the guidelines (i.e. the CERF recipient agencies and their implementing