The Future of European Liberalism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Future of European Liberalism FEATURE THE FUTURE OF EUROPEAN LIBERALISM Multi-party European parliaments provide a place for distinctively liberal parties, writes Charles Richardson he most fundamental feature of ways: our parties support the electoral system that Australian politics is the two-party supports them. system. Almost a hundred years ago, But Australia is relatively unusual in these in the Fusion of 1909, our different respects. In most European democracies, with non-Labor parties merged to create different histories and different electoral systems, Ta single party, of which today’s Liberal Party is the liberal parties survived through the twentieth direct descendant. It and the Labor Party have century, and many of them are now enjoying contended for power ever since. something of a resurgence. Before Fusion, the party system was more A brief digression here might clarify what I fl exible and different varieties of liberals had some mean by ‘liberal’. Philosophically, a liberal is one scope to develop separate identities. At the federal who believes in the tenets of the Enlightenment, level, there were Free Trade and Protectionist a follower of Montesquieu, Smith and von parties; in most of the states, there were Liberal and Humboldt. Applying the word to political parties Conservative parties. Sometimes rival liberal groups I am not using it as a philosophical term of art, were allied with each other or with conservatives, but as a practical thing: the typical liberal parties but sometimes they joined with Labor: George are those that have a historical connection with Reid, the Free Trade premier of New South Wales, the original liberal movements of the nineteenth for example, governed with Labor support for most century, with their programme of representative of the 1890s. Queensland had a Labor-Liberal government, abolition of feudal privilege, freedom coalition government as late as 1907. of speech and of religion, free trade and national As the Labor Party became more powerful, self-determination. however, this flexibility disappeared. Labor Since 1947 they have been organised as a group leaders wanted power in their own right, and were called Liberal International (LI), which currently increasingly able to get it; middle-class parties, has member parties in 47 countries. As the LI concerned about the growing threat from ‘socialism’, website puts it, the ‘common principles which banded together. So for a century liberals have been unite all liberal parties’ include ‘human rights, stuck with conservatives, and for most of that time free and fair elections and multiparty-democracy, they have been marginalised accordingly. social justice, tolerance, social market economy, free With a two-party system, Australia also trade, environmental sustainability and a strong developed an electoral system that strongly favours sense of international solidarity.’ (See www.liberal- its continuation and discriminates against minor parties, particularly those that are geographically Charles Richardson is a former editor of dispersed. The National Party (formerly Country Policy. This article is based on a talk given Party) is the only third party of modern times to the Melbourne Adam Smith Club on 11 that has been able to win seats in the House of October 2006. Representatives. The causal chain clearly runs both POLICY • Vol. 23 No. 1 • Autumn 2007 37 AAutumn_Policy_07-1.inddutumn_Policy_07-1.indd 3737 99/03/2007/03/2007 11:08:2011:08:20 AMAM EUROPEAN LIBERAL PARTIES international.org/editorial.asp?ia_id=508.) It is ministries in the Gyurcsany government. Last year’s the counterpart to the Socialist International on crisis, instead of prising the liberals away from the the left and the International Democrat Union for socialists, has demonstrated that economic reform centre-right parties. (Australia’s Liberal Party is the is the key national issue, and they are on the same only one with ‘Liberal’ in its name to have joined side: pro-reform and pro-European integration, the latter rather than LI.) while the conservative opposition fl irts with more So European countries typically developed multi- populist nationalism. party systems, with most parties readily classifi able Italy, like Hungary, seems to be groping its way under the headings right (conservative or fascist), towards a two-party system. The largest centrist socialist (communist or social-democratic), and liberal party in Italy derives mostly from the left of the old or centrist. The last century has not been a good Christian Democrats: called La Margherita (not time for liberalism, and for most of the time liberal a pizza, but Italian for ‘the daisy’)—Democracy parties were much smaller than their rivals to left or is Liberty, it now forms part of l’Ulivo (‘the Olive right. However, because they were seen as being in Tree’), the core of Romano Prodi’s centre-left coalition the ‘centre’, with some elements appealing to each of government. (The other main party in l’Ulivo is the the other forces (social policies to the left, economic Democrats of the Left, formerly the reformist wing policies to the right), they often held the balance of of the Communists.) L’Ulivo scored a combined vote power between them. In Germany, for example, the of 31.6% in last year’s Italian election; in the Senate, liberals (called the Free Democrats), although rarely where the parties ran separately, La Margherita won winning more than about 10% of the vote, contrived 10.5% and 39 seats. to be in government as junior partner to either left or Italy has a number of smaller liberal parties, with right for most of the 50 years to 1998. such names as European Republican Movement, Rose in the Fist and Liberal Reformers. The Europe today majority are in Prodi’s coalition, but some belong To give some idea of how liberal parties are placed to the opposition centre-right grouping ‘House in Europe today, I have picked out as examples four of Liberties’. There they represent a small but countries that I’ve spent some time in. Any selection important element of a coalition that also includes involves some simplifi cation, but I think they are two neo-fascist parties. fairly representative of the rather mixed picture in As both coalitions reach out to the centre, liberals Europe as a whole, and they raise some interesting seem assured of a continued place, and are driving questions about the role liberal parties will play in Italy towards much-needed economic and political the continent’s future. reforms. It is almost the opposite of Australia’s Fusion Hungary is the smallest of the four, but got some experience: just as the union of diverse elements on the attention in the Australian media last year due to right boosted conservatism, the corresponding process the (sometimes violent) demonstrations against the on the left boosts liberalism. government of Ferenc Gyurcsany. After the fall of Whereas Italy is moving towards a two-party communism, Hungary, like several other central system, the United Kingdom appears to be moving and eastern European countries, developed a three- away. Its liberal party, the Liberal Democrats, has the party system: socialists (ex-communists), liberals oldest continuous history of all, dating back to the and conservatives, with shifting alliances between Whigs of the early 1680s. In terms of votes it is one them. But support for the liberal party, the Alliance of the most successful liberal parties in the world, but of Free Democrats (SzDSz), has declined from a the UK, like Australia and unlike most of continental peak of 23.8% to just 6.5% at last year’s elections, Europe, has only single-member electorates. Britain with 18 of the 386 seats. as a result has been regarded as the very model of a Its vote now seems to have stabilised, and two-party system: in 2001, for example, Labour and SzDSz retained the prestigious post of mayor of the Conservatives won 72.4% of the vote between Budapest at the recent local government elections. them, and 87.8% of the seats. It also seems to have become fi xed in place as a But support for the Liberal Democrats has been junior partner to the Socialist Party, with three growing, and at the last election, in May 2005, they 38 Vol. 23 No. 1 • Autumn 2007 • POLICY AAutumn_Policy_07-1.inddutumn_Policy_07-1.indd 3838 99/03/2007/03/2007 11:08:2011:08:20 AMAM EUROPEAN LIBERAL PARTIES won 62 of the 646 seats in the House of Commons. economy is in need of serious reform. Both major That’s still a poor return for their 22.1% of the vote, parties have nominated candidates for this year’s but in a close election it could easily be enough to presidential election who are seen as pro-reform, win them the balance of power, with the leverage and the UDF may yet play a crucial role in ensuring to secure a change in the electoral system. the adoption of more liberal policies. The Liberal Democrats have been shifting position as well as growing; after a period when they Conclusion were generally seen as closer to the Labour Party Where does all this leave us? It seems to me there (including a brief spell of formal cooperation in the are two possibilities. late 1970s), they seem to be reaching out more to Maybe, as European observers mostly think, the Conservatives, helped by the more progressive there are just naturally these days three mainstream tone of the latter set by new leader David Cameron. political tendencies, and the ever-shifting balance Thanks to the reforms of Margaret Thatcher’s among them is a normal and healthy state of government in the 1980s, Britain does not share affairs. If so, then Australia one day should return the same economic problems as much of the rest to that sort of system, either by our existing parties of Europe, and economic issues are less a point splitting and rearranging themselves, or some new of distinction.
Recommended publications
  • Network Pa Erns of Legislative Collaboration In
    Network Paerns of Legislative Collaboration in Twenty Parliaments Franc¸ois Briae [email protected] Supplementary online material is appendix contains detailed information on the data and networks briey documented in the short note “Network Paerns of Legislative Collaboration in Twenty Parliaments”. Section A starts by reviewing the existing literature on legislative cosponsorship as a strategic position-taking device for legis- lators within parliamentary chambers. Section B then documents the data collection process, Section C summarises its results, and Section D contains the full list of party abbreviations used in the data. Section E fully documents how the cosponsorship networks were constructed and weighted, and lists some derived measures. e replication material for this study is available at https://github.com/ briatte/parlnet. e code was wrien in R (R Core Team, 2015), and the cur- rent release of the repository is version 2.6. See the README le of the reposi- tory for detailed replication instructions including package dependencies. e raw data up to January 2016 are available at doi:10.5281/zenodo.44440. CONTENTS A Background information on legislative cosponsorship . 2 B Sample denition and data collection . 4 B.1 Bills . 4 B.2 Sponsors . 10 C Descriptive statistics by country, chamber and legislature . 11 D Party abbreviations and Le/Right scores . 17 E Cosponsorship network construction . 27 E.1 Edge weights . 28 E.2 Network objects . 30 E.3 Network descriptors . 31 References . 35 1 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON LEGISLATIVE COSPONSORSHIP Legislative scholarship oers a wealth of studies that stress the importance of collabo- ration between Members of Parliament (MPs) in the lawmaking process.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook CPDS I 1960-2013
    1 Codebook: Comparative Political Data Set, 1960-2013 Codebook: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET 1960-2013 Klaus Armingeon, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler The Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2013 (CPDS) is a collection of political and institu- tional data which have been assembled in the context of the research projects “Die Hand- lungsspielräume des Nationalstaates” and “Critical junctures. An international comparison” directed by Klaus Armingeon and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. This data set consists of (mostly) annual data for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member coun- tries for the period of 1960 to 2013. In all countries, political data were collected only for the democratic periods.1 The data set is suited for cross-national, longitudinal and pooled time- series analyses. The present data set combines and replaces the earlier versions “Comparative Political Data Set I” (data for 23 OECD countries from 1960 onwards) and the “Comparative Political Data Set III” (data for 36 OECD and/or EU member states from 1990 onwards). A variable has been added to identify former CPDS I countries. For additional detailed information on the composition of government in the 36 countries, please consult the “Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Com- position 1960-2013”, available on the CPDS website. The Comparative Political Data Set contains some additional demographic, socio- and eco- nomic variables. However, these variables are not the major concern of the project and are thus limited in scope. For more in-depth sources of these data, see the online databases of the OECD, Eurostat or AMECO.
    [Show full text]
  • SB I Knew Him Well Press Book Eng 2
    MARIANNA DE LISO, SIMONE GATTONI, ENRICA GONELLA Present S.B. I KNEW HIM WELL S.B. IO LO CONOSCEVO BENE A documentary by GIACOMO DURZI & GIOVANNI FASANELLA press screening: Tuesday November 13th l h. 07:30 p.m. l sala Studio 3 Auditorium official screening: Wednesday November 14 th l h. 04:30 p.m. l Sala Petrassi additional screening: Thursday November 15 th l h. 04:00 p.m. l Sala Cinema 2 S.B. Io lo conoscevo bene ● S.B. I Knew Him Well ● Technical Sheet Written and Directed by Giacomo Durzi & Giovanni Fasanella Supervising Editor Paola Freddi Editor Tommaso Valente and Francesco De Matteis Photography Beppe Gallo Annimation Giacomo Nanni Original Music Valerio Vigliar Sound Valeria Cocuzza Produced by Marianna De Liso, Simone Gattoni, Enrica Gonella Production Kinesis Film In partnership with The Lazio Region Nationality Italia Year of production 2012 Duration 74’ Format HD Sound Stereo International Sales INTRAMOVIES Via Manfredi 15 – 00197 Rome – Italy tel. +39.06.8077252 – fax. 06.8076156 [email protected] Press Office STORYFINDERS Lionella Bianca Fiorillo +39.340.7364203 Alessandra Izzo +39.335.6882776 Via A. Allegri da Correggio 11 - 00196 Rome - ITALY +39.06.88972779 +39.340.7364203 [email protected] [email protected] http://www.facebook.com/S.B.ioloconoscevobene credits not contractual S.B. Io lo conoscevo bene ● S.B. I Knew Him Well ● Synopsis Silvio Berlusconi rose from cruise ship entertainer to become a successful entrepreneur, and then Prime Minister of Italy. Suddenly, when he was just a hair's breadth away from attaining the highest and most sought- after office in Italy, the Quirinale, his ascent came to an abrupt halt.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019
    Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019 Codebook: SUPPLEMENT TO THE COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET – GOVERNMENT COMPOSITION 1960-2019 Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann The Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set provides detailed information on party composition, reshuffles, duration, reason for termination and on the type of government for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member countries. The data begins in 1959 for the 23 countries formerly included in the CPDS I, respectively, in 1966 for Malta, in 1976 for Cyprus, in 1990 for Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Latvia and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia. In order to obtain information on both the change of ideological composition and the following gap between the new an old cabinet, the supplement contains alternative data for the year 1959. The government variables in the main Comparative Political Data Set are based upon the data presented in this supplement. When using data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. Please quote this data set as: Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann. 2021. Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960-2019. Zurich: Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich. These (former) assistants have made major contributions to the dataset, without which CPDS would not exist. In chronological and descending order: Angela Odermatt, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, Sarah Engler, David Weisstanner, Panajotis Potolidis, Marlène Gerber, Philipp Leimgruber, Michelle Beyeler, and Sarah Menegal.
    [Show full text]
  • Internationalist Struggle to Forge a Vanguard Is Key a Revolution Is
    January-February 2007 No. 25 The $2 2 Internationalist Struggle to Forge a Vanguard Is Key A Revolution Is Brewing in Mexico Times Addario/New Lynsey York Italy: Popular Front of War, Anti-Labor Attacks. 10 A Oaxaca Commune?. 36 Australia $4, Brazil R$3, Britain £1.50, 50 Bullets: Racist NYPD Execution . 7 Canada $3, Europe 2, India Rs. 25, Japan ¥250, Mexico $10, Philippines 30 p, Labor Revolt in North Carolina . 61 S. Africa R10, S. Korea 2,000 won 2 The Internationalist January-February 2007 In this issue... Mexico: The UNAM A Revolution Is Brewing in Mexico .......... 3 Strike and the Fight for Workers 50 Bullets: Racist NYPD Cop Execution, Revolution Again ........................................................ 7 March 2000 US$3 Mobilize Workers Power to Free Mumia For almost a year, tens of Abu-Jamal! .....................'--························ 9 thousands of students occupied the largest university Italy: Popular Front of Imperialist in Latin America, facing War and Anti-Labor Attacks .................... 10 repression by both the PAI government and the PAD Break Calderon's "Firm Hand" With opposition. This 64-page special supplement tells the Workers Struggle .................................. 15 story of the strike and documents the intervention State of Siege in Oaxaca, Preparations of the Grupo in Mexico City ....................................... 17 lnternacionalista. November 25 in Oaxaca: Order from/make checks payable to: Mundial Publications, Box 3321, Church Street Station, NewYork, New York 10008, U.S.A. Night of the Hyenas .............................. 20 Oaxaca Is Burning: Showdown in Mexico ........................... 21 Visit the League for the Fourth International/ Internationalist Group on the Internet The Battle of Oaxaca University ............. 23 http://www.internationalist.org A Oaxaca Commune? .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Paper
    STONE CENTER ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC INEQUALITY WORKING PAPER SERIES No. 38 Determinants of Income Composition Inequality Bilyana Petrova and Marco Ranaldi May 2021 Determinants of Income Composition Inequality ⇤ 1,2 1 Bilyana Petrova† and Marco Ranaldi‡ 1Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, The Graduate Center, CUNY 2Max Weber Programme, European University Institute May 27, 2021 Abstract This paper examines the political determinants of income composition inequal- ity in 32 advanced and emerging economies between 2006 and 2018. Income com- position inequality is defined as the extent to which the income composition in capital and labor income is unevenly distributed across the income distribution. High levels of income composition inequality are associated with class-fragmented societies, whereas low levels are typical of multiple-sources-of-income societies. We find that a higher seat share of left parties in the governing coalition and higher globalization, as measured by trade, capital openness, and FDI inflows, are linked to lower income composition inequality. Higher economic development and a higher capital income share are, instead, related to higher inequality in income composition. We discuss the mechanisms behind these relationships and check the robustness of our findings. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies looking into the causes of the dynamics of this dimension of economic inequality. Disclaimer: This paper is based on data from Eurostat, EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions [2004 - 2018]. The responsibility for all conclusions drawn from the data lies entirely with the authors. ⇤We would like to thank Drothee Bohle, Evelyne Huber, Janet Gornick, Branko Milanovic, Salvatore Morelli, Thomas Oatley, John Stephens, David Weisstanner as well as all participants at the SASE Conference 2020, the CUNY Postdoctoral Seminar, and the EUI Political Economy Working Group for their helpful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Before New Liberalism: the Continuity of Radical Dissent, 1867-1914
    Before New Liberalism: The Continuity of Radical Dissent, 1867-1914 A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2019 Nicholas A. Loizou School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Table of Contents: List of Figures 4 Abstract 6 Introduction 10 Research Objectives: A Revision in Politico-Religious History 10 A Historiographical Review 13 Methodology and Approach 23 1. Radical Dissent, Social Gospels and the Community, 1860-1906 28 1. Introduction 28 2. Growing Communitarianism and Religious Theology 29 3. The Importance of Radical Dissent and the Community 37 4. Nonconformity and the Urban Working Class 41 5. Nonconformity and the Liberal Party 51 6. Conclusion 56 2. Nonconformity, Liberalism and Labour 58 1. Introduction 58 2. The Significance of Nonconformity in Co-operative Class Relations 62 3. The Reform League 69 4. Nonconformity, Class and Christian Brotherhood in the Age of Gladstone 77 5. ‘That Church and King Mob’: Nonconformity, Brotherhood and Anti-Tory Rhetoric 82 6. Liberal-Labour Politics and the Late Nineteenth Century Social Turn in Nonconformity 87 7. Conclusion 93 3. Birmingham and the Civic Gospel: 1860-1886 94 1. Introduction 94 2. The Civic Gospel: The Origins of a Civic Theology 98 3. The Civic Gospel and the Cohesion of the Birmingham Corporation: 1860 – 1886 102 4. The Civic Gospel and Municipal Socialism: 1867-1886 111 5. The National Liberal Federation 116 6. The Radical Programme 122 7. Conclusion: The Legacy of Birmingham Progressivism 128 4. From Provincial Liberalism to National Politics: Nonconformist Movements 1860-1906 130 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Party Flags of San Marino Marcus EV Schmöger
    Political Party Flags of San Marino Marcus E. V. Schmöger Abstract San Marino is a small, independent republic, totally surrounded by Italy, with about 32,000 inhabitants. After a period of rule by the Sammarinese Fascist Party (1923–43), San Marino reintroduced a multi-party system very similar to the Italian one (the Christian-Democratic Party, Communist Party, Socialist Party, Social Democratic Party were the main competitors). Since the early 1990s the party system has undergone a number of rearrangements, some of them similar, some of them different from developments in Italy. Currently in the 60-seat parliament there are 11 parties in 8 parliamentary groups. The government is led by the Christian Democrats. Most of the parties, even the small ones, use party flags. The party flags combine international and Italian influences with distinctive Sammarinese symbols. The predominantly red colour used by the leftist parties is the most obvious international element; the use of circular emblems on an often unicoloured field is very similar to Italian practice. The specific national symbols are either part of the emblems (the three mountains from the Sammarinese arms; the Statue of Liberty; Saint Marinus) or of the flag background (white-blue field or at least a small white-blue stripe). The actual presentation included a number of flags from the author’s party flag collection. Flag with the current logo of the Alleanza Popolare Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of Vexillology, Washington, D.C., USA 1–5 August 2011 © 2011 North American Vexillological Association (www.nava.org) 921 Political Party Flags of San Marino 1.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IDEOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS of LIBERAL ECONOMIC REFORM the Case of Privatization
    THE IDEOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF LIBERAL ECONOMIC REFORM The Case of Privatization By HILARY APPEL* OLLOWING the collapse of the communist regimes in Eastern FEurope, one of the first priorities of the reform governments was to transform the system of ownership. The new governments overwhelm- ingly chose to pursue a broad program of sweeping privatization, trans- ferring the bulk of state property to the private sector. Given that most property was controlled and owned by the state and that there was no historical precedent for privatization on an economy-wide scale, policy- makers had to design from scratch a program to transfer the wealth of the state to private hands. With few exceptions, East European priva- tization officials appointed to this task concluded that it would be too slow and unwieldy to rely on the piecemeal sale of enterprises to pri- vate investors, as was typical in West European privatization. More commonly, they developed programs to transfer the ownership of state enterprises to private individuals and groups through mass distribution programs, to be followed by or supplemented with piecemeal sales. As one can imagine, these policymakers and technocrats could de- sign the mass privatization program in ways that held different distri- butional consequences for society, such that some groups would benefit more than others, for example, citizens over foreigners, one former elite group over another, managers over labor, and so on. In the Czech Re- public the government designed a mass privatization program in which there were no special privileges for any particular groups in society. * The author wishes to express her gratitude for the helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts from Andrew Barnes, Thomas Callaghy, Margaret Hanson, Meredith El Nems, Steven Fish, Denise Powers, and Peter Rutland.
    [Show full text]
  • OPEN ECONOMIES, CLOSED POLITIES: FINANCIAL GLOBALIZATION and AUTHORITARIAN POLITICS a Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of T
    OPEN ECONOMIES, CLOSED POLITIES: FINANCIAL GLOBALIZATION AND AUTHORITARIAN POLITICS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Igor O. Logvinenko January 2015 © 2015 Igor O. Logvinenko OPEN ECONOMIES, CLOSED POLITIES: FINANCIAL GLOBALIZATION AND AUTHORITARIAN POLITICS Igor O. Logvinenko, Ph. D. Cornell University 2015 This project investigates financial openness policies of authoritarian regimes during the modern age of globalized finance. Over the last quarter-century, increasingly restive publics and heightened international mobility of capital have complicated the task of governing authoritarian regimes. Financial globalization created immense opportunities for enrichment and further power consolidation, but it also made authoritarian elites increasingly vulnerable to political challenges that some regimes are better equipped to handle than others. Given this conundrum, I set out to explore the answers to the following questions: Why do some authoritarian regimes opt for greater financial openness than others? How are these decisions related to the tactics these regimes employ to remain in power? How does the nature of the asset base in the economy impact these decisions? This thesis develops a theoretical framework to address these questions, and also evaluates this theory empirically. I construct a game-theoretical argument that endogenizes financial openness policies in a model that accounts for the profit opportunities from openness and the risks associated with increased economic volatility for the authoritarian elites. I argue that when rulers consider adopting a policy of financial openness, they also take into account their ability to maintain political stability after doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook CPDS III 1990-2012
    Codebook: COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET III 1990-2012 Klaus Armingeon, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler The Comparative Political Data Set III 1990-2012 is a collection of political and institutional data. This data set consists of (mostly) annual data for a group of 36 OECD and/or EU- member countries for the period 1990-20121. The data are primarily from the data set created at the University of Berne, Institute of Political Science and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation: The Comparative Political Data Set I (CPDS I). However, the present data set differs in several aspects from the CPDS I dataset. Compared to CPDS I Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus (Greek part), Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia have been added. The present data set is suited for cross-national, longitudinal and pooled time series analyses. The data set contains some additional demographic, socio- and economic variables. However, these variables are not the major concern of the project and are thus limited in scope. For more in-depth sources of these data, see the online databases of the OECD. For trade union membership, excellent data for European trade unions is provided by Jelle Visser (2013). When using the data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. This data set is to be cited as: Klaus Armingeon, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner and Sarah Engler. 2014. Comparative Political Data Set III 1990-2012. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne. Last updated: 2014-09-30 1 Data for former communist countries begin in 1990 for Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Hungary, Malta, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Lativa and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1A: List of Government Parties September 12, 2016
    Updating the Party Government data set‡ Public Release Version 2.0 Appendix 1a: List of Government Parties September 12, 2016 Katsunori Seki§ Laron K. Williams¶ ‡If you use this data set, please cite: Seki, Katsunori and Laron K. Williams. 2014. “Updating the Party Government Data Set.” Electoral Studies. 34: 270–279. §Collaborative Research Center SFB 884, University of Mannheim; [email protected] ¶Department of Political Science, University of Missouri; [email protected] List of Government Parties Notes: This appendix presents the list of government parties that appear in “Data Set 1: Governments.” Since the purpose of this appendix is to list parties that were in government, no information is provided for parties that have never been in government in our sample (i.e, opposition parties). This is an updated and revised list of government parties and their ideological position that were first provided by WKB (2011). Therefore, countries that did not appear in WKB (2011) have no list of government parties in this update. Those countries include Bangladesh, Botswana, Czechoslovakia, Guyana, Jamaica, Namibia, Pakistan, South Africa, and Sri Lanka. For some countries in which new parties are frequently formed and/or political parties are frequently dissolved, we noted the year (and month) in which a political party was established. Note that this was done in order to facilitate our data collection, and therefore that information is not comprehensive. 2 Australia List of Governing Parties Australian Labor Party ALP Country Party
    [Show full text]