Pollen Evidence for Holocene Climate Change in the Eglinton Valley, Western Southland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pollen Evidence for Holocene Climate Change in the Eglinton Valley, Western Southland Pollen evidence for Holocene climate change in the Eglinton Valley, western Southland Bronwyn van Valkengoed A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of Master of Science in Geography at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. March 2011 In loving memory of Grandad Fowler and Opa van Valkengoed Memories of you will always be with me xoxox Abstract Numerous palaeoclimatic investigations have been undertaken throughout New Zealand in an attempt to reconstruct the vegetation and climatic history of the Holocene (10,000 yr B.P. to present). It is surprising therefore, that to date no detailed investigations have been undertaken in western Southland; one of New Zealand’s most climatically sensitive areas. Pollen analysis was undertaken on a 450 cm (5,030 ± 20 year old) peat core extracted from Eglinton Bog, western Southland, to reconstruct the mid to late Holocene vegetation and climatic history of this area. By 2,300 yr B.P. Nothofagus Fuscospora had expanded throughout the Eglinton area and by ~ 1,000 yr B.P. a species poor N. fusca/ Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides forest had largely replaced the pre-existing N. menziesii forest. The transition is believed to be associated with the further deterioration of the mid to late Holocene climate to the cooler, wetter, frostier and cloudier climatic conditions that dominate the area today. Using evidence from Eglinton Bog as a starting point a detailed integrated regional comparison of southern New Zealand’s Holocene vegetation and climatic history was established by comparing individual site elevation, mean annual temperature and precipitation, and pollen records. A regional expansion of N. menziesii and N. Fuscospora was recorded throughout southern New Zealand between approximately 5,000 – 1,500 yr B.P. However, the timing, rate of change and extent that species became dominant varied between locations. It is suggested that while climate change was the main forcing factor behind the transition from tall Podocarp forest to N. menziesii forest, and eventually N. Fuscospora; for the vast majority of southern New Zealand, the variation in the rate, timing and magnitude of the species expansion between different locations within southern New Zealand appears to have also been influenced by a combination of site specific variables including local climatic conditions, altitude, the absence of refugia, fire frequency and the symbiotic relationship between Nothofagus roots and fungi. i Acknowledgments To all of the people who assisted, encouraged, guided and helped me throughout the course of my studies, I wish to express my gratitude and sincere thanks. In particular I would like to thank: My supervisor Associate Professor Sean Fitzsimons for your direction and guidance throughout, especially towards the end. I know it didn’t make for pleasant bed time reading. And for the experience of a life time. Jamie Howarth for your patience, guidance and hours spent teaching me the ways of Pollen Analysis, helping identify unknown pollen types, discussing the many issues that arose, and your generally approachability over the last year. Your help and advice has not gone unappreciated and I am greatly indebted to you! N.B. “At some point you have to stop being a perfectionist and make decisions” All the best with your PhD. (Dr) Sarah Mager for your pep talks, guidance and editing skills not only over the course of this thesis but throughout my undergraduate study as well, especially hideous fourth year. You are right Masters is way easier. Julie Clark for your assistance in the laboratory. Sorry about the flood. David McDowell and Nigel McDonald for your computer genius and help with equipment. Marcus Vandergoes for your help identifying unknown pollen types and John Steel for your help keying out and identify plant species. Todd Redpath for your patience while teaching me ArcGIS and your handy tips. The Department of Conservation for allowing me access to Eglinton Bog. All the guys and girls in the Department of Geography who have helped me over the years. Dana and Kath for the walks and talks about life, and for being sounding boards throughout university life. Mum and Dad for your pep talks and support throughout my 5.3 years at varsity. For your belief in me and that I was actually doing something at university other than eating my lunch. A special thanks to Mum for your special cards which helped keep the junk draw stocked, and lugging the GPR up the 14 m high hill while fighting off sand flies. To Dad for your pep talks at 10.30 pm, car advice and hugs. Last but not least, my dearest Slade for your reassurance, belief and support of me throughout the year. Thank you for your patience, understanding, wicked sense of humour and love of all things unhealthy. ii Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... iii Table of Figures ......................................................................................................................... vi Table of Tables ........................................................................................................................ viii 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 Vegetation history of New Zealand ................................................................................. 4 2.1 The vegetation history of New Zealand .................................................................. 4 2.1.1 LGM to Holocene Vegetation History of New Zealand......................................... 4 2.1.2 LGM to Holocene Vegetation History of Southern New Zealand ....................... 13 2.2 Summary ................................................................................................................. 23 2.3 Research objectives................................................................................................. 25 3 Methodology and Field Area ........................................................................................ 26 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 26 3.2 Research Strategy ................................................................................................... 26 3.2.1 Pollen analysis ...................................................................................................... 27 3.2.2 Assumptions and Limitations of Pollen Analysis ................................................ 27 3.2.3 Pollen preservation ............................................................................................... 29 3.2.4 Peat deposits as a preservation medium ............................................................... 29 3.3 Field Area ................................................................................................................ 31 3.3.1 Regional setting .................................................................................................... 31 3.3.2 Study Area ............................................................................................................ 33 3.4 Field Methods .......................................................................................................... 39 3.4.1 Ground Penetrating Radar .................................................................................... 39 3.4.2 Peat coring for pollen analysis ............................................................................. 39 iii 3.4.3 Vegetation surveying ............................................................................................ 41 3.5 Laboratory methods ............................................................................................... 41 3.5.1 Pollen analysis ...................................................................................................... 41 3.5.2 Radiocarbon dating ............................................................................................... 47 4 Results .............................................................................................................................. 48 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 48 4.2 Vegetation composition of Eglinton Bog .............................................................. 48 4.3 Geomorphology of the Eglinton Bog ..................................................................... 49 4.4 Stratigraphy and chronology of the pollen core .................................................. 51 4.5 Pollen Analysis ........................................................................................................ 54 4.5.1 Pollen diagram biostratigraphy ............................................................................. 54 4.5.2 Zone 1 (450 – 295 cm) ......................................................................................... 54 4.5.3 Zone 2 (295 – 195 cm) ......................................................................................... 56 4.5.4 Zone 3 (195 – 75 cm) ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Mccaskill Alpine Garden, Lincoln College : a Collection of High
    McCaskill Alpine Garden Lincoln College A Collection of High Country Native Plants I/ .. ''11: :. I"" j'i, I Joy M. Talbot Pat V. Prendergast Special Publication No.27 Tussock Grasslands & Mountain Lands Institute. McCaskill Alpine Garden Lincoln College A Collection of High Country Native Plants Text: Joy M. Tai bot Illustration & Design: Pat V. Prendergast ISSN 0110-1781 ISBN O- 908584-21-0 Contents _paQ~ Introduction 2 Native Plants 4 Key to the Tussock Grasses 26 Tussock Grasses 27 Family and Genera Names 32 Glossary 34 Map 36 Index 37 References The following sources were consulted in the compilation of this manual. They are recommended for wider reading. Allan, H. H., 1961: Flora of New Zealand, Volume I. Government Printer, Wellington. Mark, A. F. & Adams, N. M., 1973: New Zealand Alpine Plants. A. H. & A. W. Reed, Wellington. Moore, L.B. & Edgar, E., 1970: Flora of New Zealand, Volume II. Government Printer, Wellington. Poole, A. L. & Adams, N. M., 1980: Trees and Shrubs of New Zealand. Government Printer, Wellington. Wilson, H., 1978: Wild Plants of Mount Cook National Park. Field Guide Publication. Acknowledgement Thanks are due to Dr P. A. Williams, Botany Division, DSIR, Lincoln for checking the text and offering co.nstructive criticism. June 1984 Introduction The garden, named after the founding Director of the Tussock Grasslands and Mountain Lands Institute::', is intended to be educational. From the early 1970s, a small garden plot provided a touch of character to the original Institute building, but it was in 1979 that planning began to really make headway. Land­ scape students at the College carried out design projects, ideas were selected and developed by Landscape architecture staff in the Department of Horticul­ ture, Landscape and Parks, and the College approved the proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Even-Aged Nothofagus Truncata and N. Fusca Stands in North Westland, New Zealand
    12 DYNAMICS OF EVEN-AGED NOTHOFAGUS TRUNCATA AND N. FUSCA STANDS IN NORTH WESTLAND, NEW ZEALAND M. C SMALE Forest Research Institute, Private Bag, Rotorua, New Zealand H. VAN OEVEREN Agricultural University, Salverdaplein 11, P.O. Box 9101, 6700 HB, Wageningen, The Netherlands C D. GLEASON* New Zealand Forest Service, P.O. Box 138, Hokitika, New Zealand and M. O. KIMBERLEY Forest Research Institute, Private Bag, Rotorua, New Zealand (Received for publication 30 August, 1985; revision 12 January 1987) ABSTRACT Untended, fully stocked, even-aged stands of Nothofagus truncata (Col.) Ckn. (hard beech) or N. fusca (Hook, f.) Oerst. (red beech) of natural and cultural origin and ranging in age from 20 to 100 years, were sampled using temporary and permanent plots on a range of sites in North Westland, South Island, New Zealand. Changes in stand parameters with age were quantified in order to assess growth of these stands, and thus gain some insight into their silvicultural potential. Stands of each species followed a similar pattern of growth, with rapid early height and basal area increment. Mean top height reached a maximum of c. 27 m by age 100 years. Basal area reached an equilibrium of c. 41 m2/ha in N. truncata and 46 m2/ha in N. fusca as early as age 30 years. Nothofagus truncata stands had, on average, a somewhat lower mean diameter at any given age than N. fusca stands, and maintained higher stockings. Both species attained similar maximum volume of c. 460 m3/ha at age 100 years. Keywords: even-aged stands; stand dynamics; growth; Nothofagus truncata; Nothofagus fusca.
    [Show full text]
  • Histogenesis in Roots of Nothofagus Solandri Var. Clifjortioides (Hook. F.) Poole
    Histogenesis in Roots of Nothofagus solandri var. clifJortioides (Hook. f.) Poole B. C. ARNOLD! AN INDIGENOUS EVERGREEN TREE, Nothofagus in alcohol-benzene mixtures; the specimens were solandri var. cliffortioides, forms forests which embedded in paraffin; and serial sections were dominate mountainous regions of New Zealand. cut at 10 p.. The character of the root system varies ac­ The following stains were employed : analin cording to the degree of mycorrhizal infection blue + safranin (Johansen, 1940); methyl violet (Arnold, 1960). Mycorrh izal roots are much + erythrosin (Johansen, 1940); methyl violet + branched and stunted by comparison with un­ eosin (Johansen, 1940); Crystal violet, chromic infected roots (Fig. 1). In cross-section mycor­ method (Darlington and La Cour, 1947); Feul­ rhizal roots are seen to be enveloped by a manrle gen technique for slides (Darlington and La of hyphae which penetrate in the form of a Cour, 1947); Chlorazol black E + Aceto carmine Hartig net between the radially elongated epi­ (Nebel, 1940); Chlorazol black E (Cannon, dermal cells (Fig. 2). 1941); Iron -alum ammonium sulphide (W ig­ Maximum development of mycorrhizas is glesworth, 1952). found where leaf-mold, moss, and humus are This wide range of fixatives and stains was abundant on the forest floor, and the highest employed in an attempt to determine whether incidence of fleshy non-mycorrhizal roots is the hypodermis of mycorrhizas contains living found in boggy soil, or when the tree is grown substance or whether it is in fact relatively in cultivation in heavy garden loams. empty of protoplasmic content. The present investigation was undertaken to determine whether or not the apical organiza­ OBSERVAnONS tion of Nothofagus mycorrhizas differed from In uninfecred roots of Nothofagus solandri that of uninfected roots, and to compare the var.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Variation in Impacts of Brushtail Possums on Two Loranthaceous Mistletoe Species
    SWEETAPPLE:Available on-line at:POSSUM http://www.newzealandecology.org/nzje/ IMPACTS ON MISTLETOE 177 Spatial variation in impacts of brushtail possums on two Loranthaceous mistletoe species Peter J. Sweetapple Landcare Research, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand (Email: [email protected]) Published on-line: 8 October 2008 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract: Browsing by introduced brushtail possums is linked to major declines in mistletoe abundance in New Zealand, yet in some areas mistletoes persist, apparently unaffected by the presence of possums. To determine the cause of this spatial variation in impact I investigated the abundance and condition (crown dieback and extent of possum browse cover) of two mistletoes (Alepis flavida, Peraxilla tetrapetala) and abundance and diet of possums in two mountain beech (Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides) forests in the central-eastern South Island of New Zealand. Mistletoe is common and there are long-established uncontrolled possum populations in both forests. Mistletoes were abundant (216–1359 per hectare) and important in possum diet (41–59% of total diet), but possum density was low (c. 2 per hectare) in both areas. Possum impacts were slight with low browse frequencies and intensities over much of the study sites. However, impacts were significantly greater at a forest margin, where possum abundance was highest, and at a high-altitude site where mistletoe density was lowest. Mistletoe crown dieback was inversely proportional to intensity of possum browsing. These results suggest that the persistence of abundant mistletoe populations at these sites is due to mistletoe productivity matching or exceeding consumption by possums in these forests of low possum-carrying _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________capacity, rather than low possum preference for the local mistletoe populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Canopy Dieback in a New Zealand Mountain Beech Forest!
    Pacific Science (1983), vol. 37, no. 4 © 1984 by the University of Hawaii Press. All rights reserved Canopy Dieback in a New Zealand Mountain Beech Forest! J. P. SKIPWORTH 2 ABSTRACT: Accelerated mortality is attributed to an unusually high percent­ age of old trees, an abundance of pathogenic fungi, and a putative lowering ofwater tables in the 1960s. There is some evidence to suggest that this may be a cyclical phenomenon. MOUNTAIN BEECH (Nothofagus solandri var. in a decade, with perhaps two or three minor cliffortioides) is one of two varieties of a mast years in between. widespread indigenous New Zealand tree. Seedfall occurs in late summer or autumn, Particularly associated with mountain re­ and germination takes place the following gions, it is found over a wide range of gener­ spring. Seeds are dispersed by wind and are ally poor soils and is often the forest of the rarely thrown more than a few meters from timberline. The present study was undertaken the tree on which they originate. The chances on the northwest slopes of Mt. Ruapehu ofgermination and early survival seem much (39°16' S, 175°35' E), Tongariro National greater if the seed should fall in beech litter. Park, where mountain beech mortality ap­ Although seedlings soon become capable of pears to be high over substantial areas. The an annual increase in stem length of 30­ degenerate appearance of the forest, with 40 cm, the usual situation in a forest with a large numbers of dead trunks and inter­ closed canopy is for seedlings to enter a twining masses of silvery leafless lichen­ semidormant state during which height in­ covered branches, was not in evidence prior crease may be little more than 1 cm/yr.
    [Show full text]
  • Subantarctic Forest Ecology: Case Study of a C on If Er Ou S-Br O Ad 1 E a V Ed Stand in Patagonia, Argentina
    Subantarctic forest ecology: case study of a c on if er ou s-br o ad 1 e a v ed stand in Patagonia, Argentina. Promotoren: Dr.Roelof A. A.Oldeman, hoogleraar in de Bosteelt & Bosoecologie, Wageningen Universiteit, Nederland. Dr.Luis A.Sancholuz, hoogleraar in de Ecologie, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Argentina. j.^3- -•-»'.. <?J^OV Alejandro Dezzotti Subantarctic forest ecology: case study of a coniferous-broadleaved stand in Patagonia, Argentina. PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag vand e Rector Magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit dr.C.M.Karssen in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 7 juni 2000 des namiddags te 13:30uu r in de Aula. f \boo c^q hob-f Subantarctic forest ecology: case study of a coniferous-broadleaved stand in Patagonia, Argentina A.Dezzotti.Asentamient oUniversitari oSa nMarti nd elo sAndes .Universida dNaciona lde lComahue .Pasaj e del aPa z235 .837 0 S.M.Andes.Argentina .E-mail : [email protected]. The temperate rainforests of southern South America are dominated by the tree genus Nothofagus (Nothofagaceae). In Argentina, at low and mid elevations between 38°-43°S, the mesic southern beech Nothofagusdbmbeyi ("coihue") forms mixed forests with the xeric cypress Austrocedrus chilensis("cipres" , Cupressaceae). Avirgin ,post-fir e standlocate d ona dry , north-facing slopewa s examined regarding regeneration, population structures, and stand and tree growth. Inferences on community dynamics were made. Because of its lower density and higher growth rates, N.dombeyi constitutes widely spaced, big emergent trees of the stand. In 1860, both tree species began to colonize a heterogeneous site, following a fire that eliminated the original vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Time-Calibration of the South American Fossil and Extant Species of Southern Beeches (Nothofagus)
    Phylogenetic relationships and time-calibration of the South American fossil and extant species of southern beeches (Nothofagus) BÁRBARA VENTO and FEDERICO A. AGRAÍN Vento, B. and Agraín, F.A. 2018. Phylogenetic relationships and time-calibration of the South American fossil and extant species of southern beeches (Nothofagus). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 63 (4): 815–825. The genus Nothofagus is considered as one of the most interesting plant genera, not only for the living species but also due to the fossil evidence distributed throughout the Southern Hemisphere. Early publications postulated a close rela- tionship between fossil and living species of Nothofagus. However, the intrageneric phylogenetic relationships are not yet fully explored. This work assesses the placement of fossil representatives of genus Nothofagus, using different search strategies (Equal Weight and Implied Weight), and it analyses relationships with the extant species from South America (Argentina and Chile). The relationships of fossil taxa with the monophyletic subgenera Brassospora, Fuscospora, Lophozonia, and Nothofagus and the monophyly of the clades corresponding to the four subgenera are tested. A time- calibrated tree is generated in an approach aiming at estimating the divergence times of all the major lineages. The results support the inclusion of most fossil taxa from South America into the subgenera of Nothofagus. The strict consensus tree shows the following species as closely related: Nothofagus elongata + N. alpina; N. variabilis + N. pumilio; N. suberruginea + N. alessandri; N. serrulata + N. dombeyi, and N. crenulata + N. betuloides. The species N. simplicidens shares a common ancestor with N. pumilio, N. crenulata, and N. betuloides. This contribution is one of the first attempts to integrate fossil and extant Nothofagus species from South America into a phylogenetic analysis and an approach for a time-calibrated tree.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    Xiang et al., Page S1 Supporting Information Fig. S1. Examples of the diversity of diaspore shapes in Fagales. Fig. S2. Cladogram of Fagales obtained from the 5-marker data set. Fig. S3. Chronogram of Fagales obtained from analysis of the 5-marker data set in BEAST. Fig. S4. Time scale of major fagalean divergence events during the past 105 Ma. Fig. S5. Confidence intervals of expected clade diversity (log scale) according to age of stem group. Fig. S6. Evolution of diaspores types in Fagales with BiSSE model. Fig. S7. Evolution of diaspores types in Fagales with Mk1 model. Fig. S8. Evolution of dispersal modes in Fagales with MuSSE model. Fig. S9. Evolution of dispersal modes in Fagales with Mk1 model. Fig. S10. Reconstruction of pollination syndromes in Fagales with BiSSE model. Fig. S11. Reconstruction of pollination syndromes in Fagales with Mk1 model. Fig. S12. Reconstruction of habitat shifts in Fagales with MuSSE model. Fig. S13. Reconstruction of habitat shifts in Fagales with Mk1 model. Fig. S14. Stratigraphy of fossil fagalean genera. Table S1 Genera of Fagales indicating the number of recognized and sampled species, nut sizes, habits, pollination modes, and geographic distributions. Table S2 List of taxa included in this study, sources of plant material, and GenBank accession numbers. Table S3 Primers used for amplification and sequencing in this study. Table S4 Fossil age constraints utilized in this study of Fagales diversification. Table S5 Fossil fruits reviewed in this study. Xiang et al., Page S2 Table S6 Statistics from the analyses of the various data sets. Table S7 Estimated ages for all families and genera of Fagales using BEAST.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Native Beeches: Fuscospora and Lophozonia
    Identifying native beeches: Fuscospora and Lophozonia Fuscospora cliffortioides Fuscospora solandri Fuscospora truncata Fuscospora fusca Lophozonia menziesii (Nothofagus cliffortioides) (Nothofagus solandri) (Nothofagus truncata) (Nothofagus fusca) (Nothofagus menziesii) mountain beech black beech hard beech red beech silver beech tāwhairauriki tāwhairauriki tāwhairauriki, tāwhairaunui tāwhairaunui tāwhairauriki smooth margins toothed margins • glabrous • may be sparsely hairy • 8-12 teeth each side, blunt, • 6-8 long, twisted, pointed teeth • small rounded marginal teeth uncurved on each side curve strongly in pairs or threes, blunt-ended towards leaf tip (crenate) no domatia domatia* • 4-16 x 3.5-9 mm • 8-20 x 3.5-11 mm • 13–43 × 8–30 mm • 12–45(–55) × 7–35(–40) mm • (4.8–)9–12(–30) × 5.5–14(–25) mm • ovate to triangular-ovate, often • oblong-elliptic to ovate, not • broadly ovate • broadly ovate • broadly ovate wavy usually wavy • tapered evenly to base • tapered obliquely to base, often • veins indistinct • narrowed to tip, tapered obliquely • rounded at tip, often pointed, • veins distinct, 5-6 pairs reddish • 1-4 fringed domatia in basal leaf to base tapered evenly to base axils on underside • short hairs in spaces between • veins distinct, 3-4 pairs, hairs on • veins indistinct • veins indistinct teeth veins • favoured host for mistletoe Peraxilla colensoi • dense white tomentum on • tomentum on underside shed • trunk often has flanges and • spaces between teeth deeply underside • sooty mould on bark buttresses rounded with short
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE Facultad De Ciencias Forestales Y Conservación De La Naturaleza Magíster En Áreas Silvestres Y Conservación De La Naturaleza
    UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Conservación de la Naturaleza Magíster en Áreas Silvestres y Conservación de la Naturaleza COFILOGENIA DE HONGOS FORMADORES DE ECTOMICORRIZAS DEL GÉNERO Austropaxillus Bresinsky & Jarosch 1999 Y SUS HUÉSPEDES, ESPECIES DEL GÉNERO Nothofagus Blume 1850: IMPLICANCIAS EN CONSERVACIÓN Proyecto para optar al grado de Magíster en Áreas Silvestres y Conservación de la Naturaleza. Juan Pablo Tejena Vergara Santiago, Chile 2014 Proyecto de grado presentado como parte de los requisitos para optar al grado de Magíster en Áreas Silvestres y Conservación de la Naturaleza. Coordinador de Programa Profesor(a) Nombre: Juan Caldentey Pont Firma ____________________________ Profesor(a) Guía/Patrocinante Nombre: Rosa Scherson Nota ____________________________ Firma ____________________________ Comité de Proyecto de Grado Profesor(a) Consejero(a) Marco Méndez Nota ____________________________ Firma ____________________________ Profesor(a) Consejero(o) Álvaro Promis Nota ____________________________ Firma ____________________________ Agradecimiento A la Dra. Rosa Scherson, docente de la Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Conservación de la Naturaleza, de la Universidad de Chile, por su brillante asesoría académica, paciencia, amistad, y confianza depositada en mí durante la realización de este trabajo. Al Laboratorio de Sistemática y Evolución de Plantas del Departamento de Silvicultura y Conservación de la Naturaleza, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Conservación de la Naturaleza, de la Universidad de
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Review of New Zealand Chrysomelinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
    Zootaxa 4740 (1): 001–066 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4740.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0941B63B-331E-44B1-8D6B-2362DB24057F ZOOTAXA 4740 Generic Review of New Zealand Chrysomelinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) RICHARD A.B. LESCHEN1, CHRIS A. M. REID2 & KONSTANTIN S. NADEIN3 1 Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, New Zealand Arthropod Collection, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand E-mail: [email protected] 2Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 1 William Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia E-mail: [email protected] 3Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Institute of Zoology, University of Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118 Kiel, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by M. Schoeller: 17 Oct. 2019; published: 18 Feb. 2020 RICHARD A.B. LESCHEN, CHRIS A. M. REID & KONSTANTIN S. NADEIN Generic Review of New Zealand Chrysomelinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) (Zootaxa 4740) 66 pp.; 30 cm. 18 Feb. 2020 ISBN 978-1-77670-885-7 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77670-886-4 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2020 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] https://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2020 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-) Ocak-Şubat-Mart Sayısı
    TMMOB ORMAN MÜHENDİSLERİ ODASI Beştepeler Mah. 31. Sok. No: 3 • Beştepe-Yenimahalle/ANKARA Tel: (0312) 215 00 33 pbx • Belgegeçer: (0312) 215 01 81 e-posta: [email protected] www.ormuh.org.tr İÇİNDEKİLER Yıl: 51 • Sayı: 1-2-3 • OCAK/ŞUBAT/MART 2014 TMMOB Orman Mühendisleri Odası Adına Sahibi BAŞYAZI Ali KÜÇÜKAYDIN Yayın Sorumlusu 2 Prof. Dr. Devlet TOKSOY Sorumlu Yazı İşleri Müdürü Okan ÇANÇİN Yayın Kurulu Sevda ERGİZ Prof. Dr. Ender MAKİNACI Orman Yük. Mühendisi İstanbul Üniv. Orm. Fak. Hüseyin AYTAÇ Prof. Dr. Erol BURDURLU Orman Mühendisi Gazi Üniv. Tek. Eğt. Fak. Ali İzzet BAŞER Prof. Dr. Mustafa AVCI Orman Mühendisi Süleyman Demirel Üniv. Orm. Fak. Fatih SARAÇ Prof. Dr. Özden GÖRÜCÜ Ağaç İşleri End. Yük. Mühendisi Sütçü İmam Üniv. Orm. Fak. Emre TOPBAŞ Prof. Dr. Selman KARAYILMAZLAR Orman End. Mühendisi Bartın Üniv. Orm. Fak. Prof. Dr. Semra ÇOLAK Karadeniz Teknik Üniv. Orm. Fak. Prof. Dr. Sezgin AYAN Kastamonu Üniv. Orm. Fak. Yayın Koşulları ODAMIZDAN Dergimizde yayınlanması istenilen yazılar bilgisayarda yazılmalı, daha önce başka bir yerde basılıp, yayınlanmamış olmalıdır. İmzalı bir dilekçe ekinde kağıda yazılı olarak, ayrıca elektronik ortamda dergimizin yönetim yerine posta ile gönderilmelidir. Yazılar 7 sayfayı (A4) geçmemelidir. 7 sayfayı aşan yazıların birbirini izleyen sayılarda yayınlanabileceği düşünülerek bölümlere ayrılmalıdır. TMMOB Orman Mühendisleri Odası Fotoğraf net ve temiz olmalı, slayt dışında sayısal gönderilecek fotoğrafların çözünürlüğü yüksek 4 45’inci Olağan Genel Kurulu olmalıdır. Yazılarda Türkçe kelimeler kullanılmalı ve Türkçe dil kurallarına uyulmalıdır. Yayınlanacak yazı ve çevirilerdeki düşünsel ve teknik sorumluluk yazarına ait olup,oda yönetimini ve Dergi Tamamlandı Yayın Kurulunu sorumlu tutmaz. Dergide yayınlanan yazılardan kaynak göstermek koşulu ile alıntı yapılabilir.
    [Show full text]