DOCSLIB.ORG

Monitoring Leaf Loss and Possum Impact on New Zealand Beech

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monitoring Leaf Loss and Possum Impact on New Zealand Beech Monitoring leaf loss and possum impact on New Zealand beech mistletoes A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the . Degree of Master of Science in Botany at the University of Canterbury by Laura A. Sessions "",,;:f University of Canterbury 1999 THESIS v. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................. viii List of Figures ................................................................................................................ xiii List of Plates ................................................................................................................... xv ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... xvi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1 1.1. IMPORTANCE OF HERBIVORY TO PLANT DEMOGRAPHY AND PERFORMANCE ........... 1 1.2. HERBIVORY IN NEW ZEALAND ............................................................................... 2 1.2.1. The rata example ............................................................................................. 4 1.2.2. The importance o/herbivory to native mistletoes ........................................... 5 1.3. PROJECT GOALS ...................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 2: STUDY ORGANISMS AND SITES ........................................................ 7 2.1. NEW ZEALAND BEECH MISTLETOES ........................................................................ 7 2.1.1. Alepisflavida ................................................................................................... 9 2.1.2. Peraxilla colensoi ............................................................................................ 9 2.1.3. Peraxilla tetrapetala ..................................................................................... 10 2.1.4. Causes o/mistletoe decline ........................................................................... 11 2.2. AUSTRALIAN BRUSHTAIL POSSUM (TRICHOSURUS VULPECULA KERR) ................... 12 2.2.1. General characteristics ................................................................................. 12 2.2.2. Possunl diet ................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3. Possum colonization and spread in New Zealand ........................................ 14 -. 2.2.4. Current distribution and abundance in New Zealand .................................. 15 111 2.2.5. Effects o/possums on native flora ................................................................. 16 2.3. STUDY SITES ......................................................................................................... 18 2.3.1. Site descriptions ............................................................................................ 18 2.3.1.1. Craigieburn ............................................................................................. 21 2.3.1.2. Lake Ohau ............................................................................................... 23 2.3.1.3. Eglinton Valley ....................................................................................... 25 2.3.1.4. Waipori Gorge ........................................................................................ 30 2.3.2. Possum densities ........................................................................................... 32 2.3.2.1. Methods .................................................................................................. 32 2.3.2.2. Results ..................................................................................................... 33 2.3.2.3. Conclusions ............................................................................................. 35 CHAPTER 3: EVIDENCE FOR POSSUM DAMAGE ON NATIVE MISTLETOES. 38 3.1. MT. MISERY: FIRST EVIDENCE AGAINST POSSUMS ................................................. 38 3.1.1. 1978-1984 ..................................................................................................... 38 3.1.2. 1984-1997 ..................................................................................................... 39 3.1.3. Conclusionsfrom Mt. lv.fisery ........................................................................ 40 3 .2. ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE ......................................................................................... 41 3.2.1. Coinciding possum colonisation and mistletoe decline ................................ 41 3.2.2. Changes in plant health afterprotectionfrom browse ................................. 42 3.3. DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION MONITORING PROGRAMS ................................. 42 3.3.1. Eglinton Valley Mistletoe Monitoring ........................................................... 42 3.3.1.1. Methods .................................................................................................. 43 3.3 .1.2. Results ..................................................................................................... 44 3.3.1.3. Conclusions ............................................................................................. 45 3.3.2. Hurunui Mainland Island j\1onitoring Programme ...................................... 46 3.3 .2.1. Project background and methods ............................................................ 46 3.3.2.2. Results and conclusions .......................................................................... 46 3.4. EVIDENCE AGAINST POSSUMS AS THE PRIMARY AGENT OF DECLINE ...................... 47 3.5. CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................... 49 IV CHAPTER 4: PATTERNS OF MISTLETOE LEAF LOSS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PLANT HEALTH .................................................................................................. 50 4.1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 50 4.2. METHODS ............................................................................................................. 51 4.2.1. Identifying types of leaf damage ................................................................... 51 4.2.2. Experimental design ...................................................................................... 54 4.2.3. Data analysis ................................................................................................. 55 4.2.3.1. Meanleaf1oss ......................................................................................... 55 4.2.3.2. Variation in leaf loss ............................................................................... 56 4.2.3.3. Annual flux in leaf area .......................................................................... 57 4.3. RESULTS ............................................................................................................... 57 4.3.1. Plant and branch loss .................................................................................... 57 4.3.2. Mean leaf loss ............................................................................................... 59 4.3.3. Variation in leafloss ........: ............................................................................ 64 4.3.4. Annual flux in leaf area .. ............................................................................... 65 4.4. DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................... 68 4.4.1. Mean leafloss ............................................................................................... 68 4.4.1.1. Insect loss ................................................................................................ 68 4.4.1.2. Possum damage and associated abscission ............................................. 69: 4.4.1.3. Other causes of abscission ...................................................................... 70 4.4.2. The importance ofheterogeneity .................................................................... 71 4.4.3. Annual flux in leaf area: implications for plant health ................................. 73 4.5. CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................... 76 CHAPTER 5: FACTORS INFLUENCING HERBIVORY AND LEAF ABSCISSION77 5.1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 77 5 .2. VARIATION BETWEEN LEAVES .............................................................................. 77 5.2.1. Methodsfor leaflevel analyses ..................................................................... 77 5.2.2. Results ........................................................................................................... 79 5.2.2.1. Effect ofleaf age on probability of abscission ....................................... 79 5.2.2.2. Effect ofleaf age on insect damage ........................................................ 82 5.2.2.3. Effect ofleaf age on possum browse ........... ~: ......................................... 85 5.2.2.4. Summary of effects of leaf age on leaf area loss .................................... 88
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mccaskill Alpine Garden, Lincoln College : a Collection of High
    McCaskill Alpine Garden Lincoln College A Collection of High Country Native Plants I/ .. ''11: :. I"" j'i, I Joy M. Talbot Pat V. Prendergast Special Publication No.27 Tussock Grasslands & Mountain Lands Institute. McCaskill Alpine Garden Lincoln College A Collection of High Country Native Plants Text: Joy M. Tai bot Illustration & Design: Pat V. Prendergast ISSN 0110-1781 ISBN O- 908584-21-0 Contents _paQ~ Introduction 2 Native Plants 4 Key to the Tussock Grasses 26 Tussock Grasses 27 Family and Genera Names 32 Glossary 34 Map 36 Index 37 References The following sources were consulted in the compilation of this manual. They are recommended for wider reading. Allan, H. H., 1961: Flora of New Zealand, Volume I. Government Printer, Wellington. Mark, A. F. & Adams, N. M., 1973: New Zealand Alpine Plants. A. H. & A. W. Reed, Wellington. Moore, L.B. & Edgar, E., 1970: Flora of New Zealand, Volume II. Government Printer, Wellington. Poole, A. L. & Adams, N. M., 1980: Trees and Shrubs of New Zealand. Government Printer, Wellington. Wilson, H., 1978: Wild Plants of Mount Cook National Park. Field Guide Publication. Acknowledgement Thanks are due to Dr P. A. Williams, Botany Division, DSIR, Lincoln for checking the text and offering co.nstructive criticism. June 1984 Introduction The garden, named after the founding Director of the Tussock Grasslands and Mountain Lands Institute::', is intended to be educational. From the early 1970s, a small garden plot provided a touch of character to the original Institute building, but it was in 1979 that planning began to really make headway. Land­ scape students at the College carried out design projects, ideas were selected and developed by Landscape architecture staff in the Department of Horticul­ ture, Landscape and Parks, and the College approved the proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Even-Aged Nothofagus Truncata and N. Fusca Stands in North Westland, New Zealand
    12 DYNAMICS OF EVEN-AGED NOTHOFAGUS TRUNCATA AND N. FUSCA STANDS IN NORTH WESTLAND, NEW ZEALAND M. C SMALE Forest Research Institute, Private Bag, Rotorua, New Zealand H. VAN OEVEREN Agricultural University, Salverdaplein 11, P.O. Box 9101, 6700 HB, Wageningen, The Netherlands C D. GLEASON* New Zealand Forest Service, P.O. Box 138, Hokitika, New Zealand and M. O. KIMBERLEY Forest Research Institute, Private Bag, Rotorua, New Zealand (Received for publication 30 August, 1985; revision 12 January 1987) ABSTRACT Untended, fully stocked, even-aged stands of Nothofagus truncata (Col.) Ckn. (hard beech) or N. fusca (Hook, f.) Oerst. (red beech) of natural and cultural origin and ranging in age from 20 to 100 years, were sampled using temporary and permanent plots on a range of sites in North Westland, South Island, New Zealand. Changes in stand parameters with age were quantified in order to assess growth of these stands, and thus gain some insight into their silvicultural potential. Stands of each species followed a similar pattern of growth, with rapid early height and basal area increment. Mean top height reached a maximum of c. 27 m by age 100 years. Basal area reached an equilibrium of c. 41 m2/ha in N. truncata and 46 m2/ha in N. fusca as early as age 30 years. Nothofagus truncata stands had, on average, a somewhat lower mean diameter at any given age than N. fusca stands, and maintained higher stockings. Both species attained similar maximum volume of c. 460 m3/ha at age 100 years. Keywords: even-aged stands; stand dynamics; growth; Nothofagus truncata; Nothofagus fusca.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardens R by DANIEL J
    gARDENS r BY DANIEL J. FOLEY Editor of Horticulture REPRINTED FROM THE HERBARIST A Publication of The Herb Society of America No. 19 $<X>$«><>$*3><><>3><><>&3>3^^ For Use and for Delight :>>&<X><2><»3>'3K3x3>O<3K><>c?<>3><^ BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 1953 MARY GARDENS r c By DANIEL J. FOLEY MORE than a quarter of a century ago when I first began to explore the plant realm, I remember a visit I made one warm afternoon in June. It was to an old Salem garden where sweet William and fox- gloves, delphiniums and Canterbury bells, ferns and sweet rocket and a host of other plants flourished in a series of meandering bor- ders. The flower beds were edged with violets which were kept trim and formal by reason of the " bobbing " or shearing their owner gave them on several occasions through the summer months. I recall an espaliered peach tree which covered one side of the old tool shed, but most of all I remember a figure of Our Lady enshrined in a shady corner of the garden. My inquisitiveness got the better of me and I asked about the shrine. The dear old lady who tended the garden told me that she had dedicated her garden to Mary and, some- how, the thought lingered with me. At that time I knew nothing of the tradition of the Mary Gardens of the Middle Ages, but a few years later, while doing some research in college, I discovered a host of ancient plant traditions associated with the life of Our Lady.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Review of the Genus Rosa
    REVIEW ARTICLE Taxonomic Review of the Genus Rosa Nikola TOMLJENOVIĆ 1 ( ) Ivan PEJIĆ 2 Summary Species of the genus Rosa have always been known for their beauty, healing properties and nutritional value. Since only a small number of properties had been studied, attempts to classify and systematize roses until the 16th century did not give any results. Botanists of the 17th and 18th century paved the way for natural classifi cations. At the beginning of the 19th century, de Candolle and Lindley considered a larger number of morphological characters. Since the number of described species became larger, division into sections and subsections was introduced in the genus Rosa. Small diff erences between species and the number of transitional forms lead to taxonomic confusion and created many diff erent classifi cations. Th is problem was not solved in the 20th century either. In addition to the absence of clear diff erences between species, the complexity of the genus is infl uenced by extensive hybridization and incomplete sorting by origin, as well as polyploidy. Diff erent analytical methods used along with traditional, morphological methods help us clarify the phylogenetic relations within the genus and give a clearer picture of the botanical classifi cation of the genus Rosa. Molecular markers are used the most, especially AFLPs and SSRs. Nevertheless, phylogenetic relationships within the genus Rosa have not been fully clarifi ed. Th e diversity of the genus Rosa has not been specifi cally analyzed in Croatia until now. Key words Rosa sp., taxonomy, molecular markers, classifi cation, phylogeny 1 Agricultural School Zagreb, Gjure Prejca 2, 10040 Zagreb, Croatia e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biometrics, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Received: November , .
    [Show full text]
  • Drought Tolerant Roses
    DROUGHT TOLERANT, LOW-MAINTENANCE ROSES ‘Aglaia’ ‘Alberic Barbier’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Albertine’ ‘American Pillar’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Anemone’ (Laevigata hybrid) ‘Banshee’ (Damask) ‘Belinda's Dream’ ‘Belle of Portugal’ ‘Blush Noisette’ ‘Caldwell Pink’ ‘Carefree Beauty’ ‘Cecile Brunner’ ‘Climbing Cecile Brunner’ ‘Climbing Pinkie’ ‘Climbing Souvenir de la Malmaison’ ‘Complicata’ ‘Crepuscule’ ‘Dorothy Perkins’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Double Plum’ ‘Dr. Van Fleet’ ‘Duchesse de Brabant ‘Else Poulsen’ ‘Fortune's Double Yellow’ ‘Francois Juranville’ ‘Frühlingsgold’ (Shrub) ‘Gardenia’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Gloire des Rosomanes’ ‘Golden Chersonese’ (Ecae hybrid) ‘Homestead’ (Hybrid China) ‘John Hopper’ ‘Knock Out’ ‘La Reine’ ‘Lady Hillingdon’ ‘Lawrence Johnston’ (Climber) ‘Marie Daly’ ‘Marie Pavie’ ‘Marie van Houtte’ ‘Mermaid’ ‘Mme. Alfred Carriere’ ‘Mme. Gabriel Luizet’ ‘Mme. Gregoire Staechelin’ ‘Mme. Plantier’ ‘Mrs. Herbert Stevens’ ‘Navaroo Ridge Noisette’ ‘New Dawn’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Papa Gontier’ ‘Paul Ricault’ ‘Paul's Double Musk’ ‘Penelope’ ‘Perle d'Or’ ‘Purezza’ (Banksiae hybrid) ‘Rambling Rector’ ‘Ramona (Laevigata hybrid) ‘Red Dorothy Perkins’ (Wichuraiana) ‘Russelliana’ ‘Sea Foam’ ‘Silver Moon’ wichuraiana ‘Stanwell Perpetual’ (Shrub) ‘Thérèse Bugnet’ (Rugosa hybrid) ‘The Fairy’ ‘Veilchenblau’ ‘Westerland’ ‘White Dorothy’ (Wichuraiana) ‘William Baffin’ ‘Wolley-Dod’ Rosa banksiae (“Lady Banks Rose”) Rosa californica Rosa californica ‘Elsie’ Rosa foetida bicolor (“Austrian Copper”) Rosa foetida persiana (“Persian Yellow”) Rosa gallica Rosa glauca Rosa laevigata (“Cherokee Rose”) Rosa minutifolia Rosa rubiginosa Rosa rugosa cultivars Rosa setigera Rosa spinosissima Rosa wichuraiana Rosa x Harisonii (“Harison's Yellow’”; Shrub) Rosa hugonis Rosa x odorata ‘Mutabilis’ Rosa xanthina (especially. f. hugonis) .
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Document
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” unesp INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS – RIO CLARO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS (BIOLOGIA VEGETAL) DIFERENCIAÇÃO INTRAESPECÍFICA NA REPRODUÇÃO E INTERAÇÕES PLANTA-POLINIZADOR EM POPULAÇÕES NATURAIS DE TREMBLEYA LANIFLORA (MELASTOMATACEAE) Natalia Costa Soares Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Câmpus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de doutor em Ciências Biológicas (Biologia Vegetal). Natalia Costa Soares DIFERENCIAÇÃO INTRAESPECÍFICA NA REPRODUÇÃO E INTERAÇÕES PLANTA-POLINIZADOR EM POPULAÇÕES NATURAIS DE TREMBLEYA LANIFLORA (MELASTOMATACEAE) Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Câmpus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de doutor em Ciências Biológicas (Biologia Vegetal). Orientador (a): Prof. Dr. Leonor Patrícia Cerdeira Morellato Co-orientador: Prof. Dr. Marcio Silva Araújo RIO CLARO 2017 581.5 Soares, Natalia Costa S676d Diferenciação intraespecífica na reprodução e interações planta-polinizador em populações naturais de Trembleya laniflora (melastomataceae) / Natalia Costa Soares. - Rio Claro, 2017 134 f. : il., figs., gráfs., tabs., fots. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências de Rio Claro Orientadora: Leonor Patrícia Cerdeira Morellato Coorientador: Marcio Silva Araújo 1. Ecologia vegetal. 2. Interações planta-animal. 3. Interações planta-polinizador. I. Título. Ficha Catalográfica
    [Show full text]
  • Peraxilla Colensoi
    Peraxilla colensoi COMMON NAME Scarlet mistletoe, korukoru, pirita, roeroe SYNONYMS Elytranthe colensoi (Hook.f.) Engl. Loranthus colensoi Hook. f. FAMILY Loranthaceae AUTHORITY Peraxilla colensoi (Hook.f.) Tiegh. FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS Yes Peraxilla colensoi, Catlins. Photographer: John Barkla ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Trees & Shrubs - Dicotyledons NVS CODE PERCOL CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n= 24 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: CD PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: CD 2004 | Gradual Decline BRIEF DESCRIPTION Fleshy shrub to 3m wide growing on outer branches of beech trees with glossy green fleshy paired leaves and masses of red tubular flowers. Leaves to 8cm long, smooth with a red edge. Flowers to 2.5cm long. Fallen petals litter forest floor under plants. Fruit yellow. Photographer: Brian Molloy DISTRIBUTION North and South Island, but common only in southern parts of the South Island. HABITAT A parasite mainly found in silver beech forest but has been recorded on 16 host species (9 exotic) in New Zealand including red beech and black beech. Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) and bellbird (Anthonis melanura) disperse this species in the North Island. FEATURES A shrub up to 3 m across. It parasitises further out on branches of its host than Peraxilla tetrapetala. The veins on leaves are hardly evident and only the midrib is conspicuous. Leaf tips are never notched and the leaves themselves are large and never blistered. The leaves sit in pairs on opposite sides of the stem and are thick and have a leathery texture. Leaf margins are usually smooth with red slightly rough margins.
    [Show full text]
  • Explosive New Zealand Mistletoe Example, 4 of 7 Flowers on Sheet AK103910)
    SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE pattern, as do herbarium sheets (for Explosive New Zealand mistletoe example, 4 of 7 flowers on sheet AK103910). Trilepidea almost certainly SIR- Many flowers of the mistletoe arium sheets show an even more special­ had more complex explosive flowers than Peraxilla tetrapetala (Loranthaceae) in New ized explosive mechanism than in Peraxilla. Peraxilla. Such specialization may have Zealand open from the bottom (f in the We discovered explosive flower opening rendered Trilepidea more sensitive to figure) rather than the top (d); Kuijtl called in both endemic New Zealand Peraxilla reduced bird densities due to introduced this an "unsolved mystery ... we cannot species when we noted that flower buds mammalian predators, contributing to its even guess at the meaning of this bizarre bagged for hand pollination almost never rapid and puzzling5 decline. performance." Here we report that flower opened (3/394 for P. tetrapetala, 1/82 for P. Explosive flower opening is well known buds of P. tetrapetala and P. colensoi open colensoi). The petals remained fused at the in other mistletoes6, including many of from the top only when twisted by top, while eventually undergoing abscis­ the 230 species in Africa3, and a few a bird, a form of 'explosive' flower open­ sion from their base (fin the figure). Field species in India7, Java, New Guinea and ing common in Africa but previously observations of unbagged flowers revealed South America1•6. However, this is the unknown in Australasia. Kuijt's "bizarre that they were opened by two native first report from Australasia. The New performance" is simply the consequence of honeyeaters (Meliphagidae ): tuis (Pros­ Zealand flora generally displays few flowers not being visited by birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia's Unique Biological Diversity: New Insights from Molecular Evolutionary Studies of Parasitic Flowering Plants
    Malaysia's Unique Biological Diversity: New Insights from Molecular Evolutionary Studies of Parasitic Flowering Plants Daniel L. Nickrent Department of Plant Biology Southern Illinois University Carbondale, IL 62901-6509 e-mail: [email protected] October 2, 1995 ABSTRACT Malaysia is home to a rich assemblage of parasitic flowering plants representing seven families, 46 genera and approximately 100 species. These plants are seldom considered candidates for conservation efforts, however, many species are important components of the tropical ecosystem that show complex associations with other organisms and unique biochemical features. Results of a phylogenetic analysis of 29 members of Santalales using a combined dataset of nuclear-encoded 18S rDNA and plastid-encoded rbcL sequences are presented. Sequences from representatives of three nonphotosynthetic, holoparasitic families often allied with Santalales, Balanophoraceae, Hydnoraceae and Rafflesiaceae, have been obtained from nuclear-encoded 18S rDNA and plastid- encoded 16S rDNA. As with 18S rDNA, the 16S rDNA sequences from all three holoparasite families showed an increase in the number of substitutions. The greatest increases were seen in Mitrastema and Hydnora, greater than values obtained from pairwise comparisons involving taxa as phylogenetically distant as angiosperms and liverworts. A case is made that these plants represent unique natural genetic experiments that offer a wealth of opportunity for molecular genetic and phylogenetic analyses. 2 “We do not know enough about any gene, species, or ecosystem to be able to calculate its ecological and economic worth in the large scheme of things” (Ehrenfeld 1988) Why conserve parasitic plants? When considering the reasons for conservation of biodiversity, one inevitably concludes that all involve value judgments that are, in essence, anthropocentric.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollen Evidence for Holocene Climate Change in the Eglinton Valley, Western Southland
    Pollen evidence for Holocene climate change in the Eglinton Valley, western Southland Bronwyn van Valkengoed A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of Master of Science in Geography at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. March 2011 In loving memory of Grandad Fowler and Opa van Valkengoed Memories of you will always be with me xoxox Abstract Numerous palaeoclimatic investigations have been undertaken throughout New Zealand in an attempt to reconstruct the vegetation and climatic history of the Holocene (10,000 yr B.P. to present). It is surprising therefore, that to date no detailed investigations have been undertaken in western Southland; one of New Zealand’s most climatically sensitive areas. Pollen analysis was undertaken on a 450 cm (5,030 ± 20 year old) peat core extracted from Eglinton Bog, western Southland, to reconstruct the mid to late Holocene vegetation and climatic history of this area. By 2,300 yr B.P. Nothofagus Fuscospora had expanded throughout the Eglinton area and by ~ 1,000 yr B.P. a species poor N. fusca/ Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides forest had largely replaced the pre-existing N. menziesii forest. The transition is believed to be associated with the further deterioration of the mid to late Holocene climate to the cooler, wetter, frostier and cloudier climatic conditions that dominate the area today. Using evidence from Eglinton Bog as a starting point a detailed integrated regional comparison of southern New Zealand’s Holocene vegetation and climatic history was established by comparing individual site elevation, mean annual temperature and precipitation, and pollen records. A regional expansion of N.
    [Show full text]
  • Histogenesis in Roots of Nothofagus Solandri Var. Clifjortioides (Hook. F.) Poole
    Histogenesis in Roots of Nothofagus solandri var. clifJortioides (Hook. f.) Poole B. C. ARNOLD! AN INDIGENOUS EVERGREEN TREE, Nothofagus in alcohol-benzene mixtures; the specimens were solandri var. cliffortioides, forms forests which embedded in paraffin; and serial sections were dominate mountainous regions of New Zealand. cut at 10 p.. The character of the root system varies ac­ The following stains were employed : analin cording to the degree of mycorrhizal infection blue + safranin (Johansen, 1940); methyl violet (Arnold, 1960). Mycorrh izal roots are much + erythrosin (Johansen, 1940); methyl violet + branched and stunted by comparison with un­ eosin (Johansen, 1940); Crystal violet, chromic infected roots (Fig. 1). In cross-section mycor­ method (Darlington and La Cour, 1947); Feul­ rhizal roots are seen to be enveloped by a manrle gen technique for slides (Darlington and La of hyphae which penetrate in the form of a Cour, 1947); Chlorazol black E + Aceto carmine Hartig net between the radially elongated epi­ (Nebel, 1940); Chlorazol black E (Cannon, dermal cells (Fig. 2). 1941); Iron -alum ammonium sulphide (W ig­ Maximum development of mycorrhizas is glesworth, 1952). found where leaf-mold, moss, and humus are This wide range of fixatives and stains was abundant on the forest floor, and the highest employed in an attempt to determine whether incidence of fleshy non-mycorrhizal roots is the hypodermis of mycorrhizas contains living found in boggy soil, or when the tree is grown substance or whether it is in fact relatively in cultivation in heavy garden loams. empty of protoplasmic content. The present investigation was undertaken to determine whether or not the apical organiza­ OBSERVAnONS tion of Nothofagus mycorrhizas differed from In uninfecred roots of Nothofagus solandri that of uninfected roots, and to compare the var.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Variation in Impacts of Brushtail Possums on Two Loranthaceous Mistletoe Species
    SWEETAPPLE:Available on-line at:POSSUM http://www.newzealandecology.org/nzje/ IMPACTS ON MISTLETOE 177 Spatial variation in impacts of brushtail possums on two Loranthaceous mistletoe species Peter J. Sweetapple Landcare Research, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand (Email: [email protected]) Published on-line: 8 October 2008 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract: Browsing by introduced brushtail possums is linked to major declines in mistletoe abundance in New Zealand, yet in some areas mistletoes persist, apparently unaffected by the presence of possums. To determine the cause of this spatial variation in impact I investigated the abundance and condition (crown dieback and extent of possum browse cover) of two mistletoes (Alepis flavida, Peraxilla tetrapetala) and abundance and diet of possums in two mountain beech (Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides) forests in the central-eastern South Island of New Zealand. Mistletoe is common and there are long-established uncontrolled possum populations in both forests. Mistletoes were abundant (216–1359 per hectare) and important in possum diet (41–59% of total diet), but possum density was low (c. 2 per hectare) in both areas. Possum impacts were slight with low browse frequencies and intensities over much of the study sites. However, impacts were significantly greater at a forest margin, where possum abundance was highest, and at a high-altitude site where mistletoe density was lowest. Mistletoe crown dieback was inversely proportional to intensity of possum browsing. These results suggest that the persistence of abundant mistletoe populations at these sites is due to mistletoe productivity matching or exceeding consumption by possums in these forests of low possum-carrying _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________capacity, rather than low possum preference for the local mistletoe populations.
    [Show full text]