DOCSLIB.ORG

UN Trust Fund for Human Security Canton 10 Project Final Evaluation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UN Trust Fund for Human Security Canton 10 Project Final Evaluation Report A report for: UN Country Team, Bosnia and Herzegovina UN Trust Fund for Human Security Canton 10 Project Final Evaluation Report Richard Allen March 2017 [email protected] Richard Allen UN Trust Fund for Human Security Canton 10 Project: UN Country Team, BiH Final Evaluation Report Evaluation Contract No. SSA 16-378, 05/09/2016 Rapid Assessment/Final evaluation of the UN Human Security Trust Fund Joint Project Applying Human Security Evaluation Title concept to stabilize communities in Canton 10 (Canton 10 Project) Applying the Human Security Concept to Stabilize Project Name Communities in Canton 10 UN organisation responsible for UNDP management of the project Executing UN organisations UNDP, UNHCR, UNICEF and IOM Project Location Canton 10, Bosnia and Herzegovina Start Date 1 September 2013 End Date 31 December 2016 Total budget USD 2,500,001.51 Actual expenditure USD 2,500,001.51 (forecast as of May 2016) Donor(s) United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security To eliminate community, personal, and economic Human Security Goal insecurities which place Canton 10 at risk of instability Project Objectives 1. Ensure sustainability by facilitating stakeholder ownership (i.e. Governmental authorities at all levels, CSOs) 2. Enhance joint / shared capacity of the Cantonal and municipal authorities to provide social services to decrease personal and community insecurities 3. Strengthen the capacity of schools, Cantonal and Municipal authorities to prevent discrimination and violence 4. Ensure critical areas in Canton 10 improve local responsiveness to community safety risks and threats 5. Empower local communities to improve access to employment to ensure economic sustainability of return 28 March 2017 Page 2 of 157 Richard Allen UN Trust Fund for Human Security Canton 10 Project: UN Country Team, BiH Final Evaluation Report Contents 1 BASIC DATA ...............................................................................................................................5 1.1 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Timeline .................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Maps....................................................................................................................................................... 6 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................8 3 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Evaluation Purpose .............................................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Report Structure .................................................................................................................................. 14 3.3 Context background ............................................................................................................................. 15 3.4 Project background .............................................................................................................................. 20 4 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 23 4.1 Scope of Evaluation .............................................................................................................................. 23 4.2 Methodology and Guiding Principles ................................................................................................... 23 4.3 Methodological Constraints ................................................................................................................. 24 4.4 Ethical considerations .......................................................................................................................... 25 5 DETAILS OF THE JOINT PROJECT AND DESIRED KEY RESULTS ................................................ 26 5.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 26 5.2 Human Security Goal ............................................................................................................................ 27 5.3 Objective 1 – Ownership/Policy Commitment ..................................................................................... 29 5.4 Objective 2 – Public Services ................................................................................................................ 33 5.5 Objective 3 – Education and Prevention of Violence in Schools .......................................................... 38 5.6 Objective 4 – Community Safety .......................................................................................................... 44 5.7 Objective 5 – Economic Development and Livelihoods ....................................................................... 48 5.8 Budget Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 57 6 FINDINGS AGAINST KEY QUESTIONS IN TOR ......................................................................... 60 6.1 Programme Relevance and Design ...................................................................................................... 60 6.2 Programme Efficiency (processes) ....................................................................................................... 71 6.3 Programme Effectiveness (results) ...................................................................................................... 76 6.4 Programme Impact .............................................................................................................................. 79 6.5 Programme Sustainability .................................................................................................................... 87 7 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................ 91 7.1 Lessons Learned ................................................................................................................................... 92 7.2 Best Practices ....................................................................................................................................... 94 8 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................ 97 8.1 Continuing area-based development in Canton 10 and beyond ......................................................... 97 8.2 Follow-up is necessary ......................................................................................................................... 97 8.3 Project management methodologies and documentation .................................................................. 98 8.4 Monitoring and Evaluation................................................................................................................... 98 8.5 Decision-making in joint projects ......................................................................................................... 98 8.6 Projects need adequate staff time ....................................................................................................... 98 8.7 Quality assurance ................................................................................................................................. 99 8.8 Recruitment – include assessment of team skills ................................................................................ 99 ANNEX 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE ......................................................................................................... 100 ANNEX 2 PROJECT PLANNED ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................ 107 ANNEX 3 LIST OF INTERVIEWEES AND SITE VISITS .............................................................................. 110 ANNEX 4 THEORY OF CHANGE ............................................................................................................ 114 28 March 2017 Page 3 of 157 Richard Allen UN Trust Fund for Human Security Canton 10 Project: UN Country Team, BiH Final Evaluation Report ANNEX 5 PROJECT BUDGET ................................................................................................................. 127 ANNEX 6 FREE LEGAL AID DATA .......................................................................................................... 128 ANNEX 7 EDUCATION - EXTRACTS FROM QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ................................................... 129 ANNEX 8 EDUCATION – EXTRACTS FROM QUANTITATIVE SURVEYS .................................................. 132 ANNEX 9 SUPPORT FOR LIVELIHOODS – BASIC DATA ......................................................................... 135 ANNEX 10 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES AND UNPLANNED ACTIVITIES ............................................ 137 ANNEX 11 PROJECT LOGICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................. 138 ANNEX 12 CONTRIBUTIONS MADE BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES AS A SUPPORT TO THE UNTFHS PROJECT IN CANTON 10 ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species from the Middle Miocene Kupres Basin (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
    THE NAUTILUS 128(2):51–54, 2014 Page 51 A new melanopsid (Gastropoda) species from the middle Miocene Kupres Basin (Bosnia and Herzegovina) Thomas A. Neubauer1 Oleg Mandic Mathias Harzhauser Geological-Paleontological Department Natural History Museum Vienna 1010 Vienna, Austria [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT teleoconch microsculpture in one species, interpreted Melanopsis fateljensis as a reaction to the oversaturation of calcium carbonate (Caenogastropoda: Cerithiimorpha: in the water under the existing alkaline, hard-water con- Melanopsidae) is described as a new species from the early ditions(e.g.,Westetal.,1991). Middle Miocene lacustrine deposits of the Kupres Basin. Sim- ilarities to other co-occurring melanopsids are discussed. Its Shortly after, another taxonomic work on the ostracod unique morphology, in particular the elongate, stepped spire and gastropod fauna of the region around Kupres was with prominent spiral bulges, clearly distinguishes the new published by Krstic´ et al. (2013). This study dealing with species from all other Melanopsidae known from the Neogene an outcrop located about 2 km ENE of Fatelj Hill of Europe. revealed a different assemblage with species known from the Sinj, Drnisˇ, and Gacko basins (Figure 1) and none of Additional Keywords: Melanopsis, freshwater gastropod, new species, Dinaride Lake System, Langhian those described by Neubauer et al. (2013a). The fauna is characterized by few species of the genera Gyraulus, Fossarulus, Bania, and “Pseudamnicola” (both occurring species were recombined with Bania by Neubauer et al., 2013a). Such a faunal composition with pulmonate and INTRODUCTION typical pioneer species corresponds to those found in the Gacko and Sinj basins and points to rather stressed, Recently, Neubauer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Peace in Bosnia Work Elizabeth M
    Cornell International Law Journal Volume 30 Article 10 Issue 3 Symposium 1997 Making Peace in Bosnia Work Elizabeth M. Cousens Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cousens, Elizabeth M. (1997) "Making Peace in Bosnia Work," Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 30: Iss. 3, Article 10. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol30/iss3/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell International Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Making Peace in Bosnia Work Elizabeth M. Cousens* This symposium asks "what makes peace agreements work" and specifically directs us to explore the degree to which and how "quasi- sovereigns" determine the answer. At a minimum, a peace agreement could be said to "work" when formerly warring parties honor their commitments more than they renege, and when a broader constituency develops within post-war society to support that agreement's basic provisions. Along both dimensions, the peace agreement providing the framework for politics in Bosnia today works haltingly at best.' The explanation for its inadequacies has very little to do with quasi-sovereignty, however. Rather, it has a great deal to do with the decisions and actions of the all-too-sovereign national governments and major international agencies that enjoy a disproportionate influence over the implementation of the peace agreement's key provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Care Systems in Bih Financing Challenges and Reform Options?
    ANALYSIS Sarajevo Health Care Systems in BiH Financing challenges and reform options? Marko Martić and ognjen Đukić, SarajeVo October 2017 High expectations and increasing needs of citizens have influenced a relatively high share of private expenditure in total health expenditure (28% in 2014) which is double the EU average (14%). In 2014, the private household health care spending of a family with three members averaged 50 KM monthly, which may pose a serious burden for the families living below or near poverty line. It indicates a certain degree of inequality in access to health care services among the citizens of BiH. There is a high level of inequality of public expenditure in health sector among the cantons by insured person in FBiH (from 453 KM to 875 KM), given that revenues from the employees’ contributions “return” to the canton they were collected in It can be said that the principle of solidarity does not extend beyond the cantonal level in this way. In order to achieve a higher level of equality in the public resources for health sector among the cantons, it is necessary for the cantons or the Government of FBiH to find other resources to make it possible. High dependence of this system on the contributions from the employed is not an optimal solution for BiH taking into account a low employment rate and population aging process. Among the EU countries applying mainly the Bismarck’s model, a trend of movement towards the so-called “mixed model” can be noticed – model involving greater participation of other sources of financing, in addition to the wage-based con- tributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Unifications
    BRIDGING THE DIVIDES-‘UNIFICATIONS’ OF MOSTAR By Jelena Mitrovic Submitted to Central European University Nationalism Studies Program In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of CEU eTD Collection Master of Arts Advisor: Florian Bieber Budapest, Hungary 2008 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1. -DEALING WITH DIVERSITY – MULTICULTURAL (MULTIETHNIC) OR COSMOPOLITAN BOSNIA? ............................................................................................................9 1.1. Solution for the conflict in Bosnia – debates on organizing the new state ................................11 1.2. Entrenching the Divide – Bosnia after Dayton ........................................................................15 1.2.1. Constituent peoples and minorities in Bosnia ...................................................................16 CHAPTER 2.- A DIVIDED CITY – (MULTI) ETHNIC MOSTAR: FROM 1994-2004 ...................24 2.1. History of Mostar...................................................................................................................25 2.2. A Tale of the Divided City –Interim Statute and the Role of International Community 1994- 2004 .............................................................................................................................................27 CHAPTER 3. - BRIDGING THE DIVIDES – ADMINISTRATIVE AND SYMBOLIC ‘UNIFICATIONS’ OF MOSTAR.....................................................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence
    Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence January 4 - February 3, 2017 Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted by Ipsos in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights and Survey Research, and was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy. • Data was collected between January 4 and February 3, 2017 through face-to-face interviews at the respondents’ homes using the CAPI method (computer assisted personal interviewing). • A total of 1,537 interviews were completed, with an overall margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percent at the midrange of the 95 percent confidence level. A nationally-representative sample was assembled based on a multistage stratification proportionate to population sample distribution, through the random selection of households and respondents. • The sample is composed of citizens of BiH, aged 18 and older and was based on the 2013 Census; Vital Statistics 2012 and Ipsos estimations derived from the Central Election Commission database; Agency for Identification Documents; and the Registers and Data Exchange of Bosnia and Herzegovina database. • The sampling frame consisted of polling station territories (approximate size of census units) within strata defined by municipalities and type of settlements (urban and rural). Polling station territories enable the most reliable sample selection, due to the fact that these units represent the most comprehensive and up-to-date data available. • Households were selected according to the random route technique. Starting from a given address, interviewers selected the third house down the same side of the street or the next available house for an interview from the starting point.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendments Liii-Lxi to the Constitution of Zenica-Doboj Canton
    Emerika Bluma 1, 71000 Sarajevo Tel. 28 35 00 Fax. 28 35 01 Department for Legal Affairs AMENDMENTS LIII-LXI TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ZENICA-DOBOJ CANTON “Official Gazette of Zenica-Doboj Canton”, 10/04 Pursuant to Article 88 of the Constitution of the Zenica-Doboj Canton (“Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina”, no. 7/96, “Official Gazette of the Zenica-Doboj Canton”, nos. 1/96 and 10/00), the Assembly of the Zenica-Doboj Canton, at the session of 29 June 2004, passed AMENDMENTS LIII – LXI TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ZENICA-DOBOJ CANTON Amendment LIII In Article 58, the word “Cantonal” shall be deleted. Amendment LIV In Article 68, after the paragraph 3, new paragraph 4 shall be added to read: “The municipality may initiate proceedings before the Constitutional Court for the protection of the right to local self-rule.” Amendment LV In Article 74, after the word “election”, the full stop punctuation mark shall be deleted, and the words: “in manner specified by law” shall be added, and the remaining part of the text shall be deleted. New Paragraph 2 shall be added to read: “Each voter may be elected for municipal councillor.” Amendment LVI In Article 75, paragraph 1, item b) shall be amended to read: “File the requests to the Constitutional Court in regard to disputes between the municipality and canton or Federation.” Amendment LVII In Article 78, after the word “Council” the full stop punctuation mark shall be inserted and the remaining part of the text shall be deleted. Amendment LVIII Article 80 shall be amended to read: “Municipal Mayor shall be democratically elected by voters at direct and secret elections in the whole area of the municipality in manner specified by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosna I Hercegovina Federacija Bosne I Hercegovine Kanton 10 Opština Drvar Opštinski Razvojni Tim
    Bosna i Hercegovina Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine Kanton 10 Opština Drvar Opštinski razvojni tim STRATEGIJA RAZVOJA OPŠTINE DRVAR za period 2016 – 2020. godina Decembar, 2015. S A D R Ž A J SADRŽAJ 2 POPIS KORIŠTENIH SKRAĆENICA 4 UVOD 6 METODOLOGIJA IZRADE STRATEGIJE RAZVOJA 8 SOCIO EKONOMSKA ANALIZA OPŠTINE DRVAR 10 1. Geografski položaj i prirodne karakteristike 10 1.1. Ključne istorijske činjenice 10 1.2. Geografsko-komunikacijske karakteristike, prirodne odlike i resursi područja 10 2. Demografske karakteristike i kretanja 12 2.1. Ukupan broj stanovnika 12 2.2. Struktura stanovništva 13 2.3. Prostorni raspored stanovništva 14 2.4. Prirodni priraštaj stanovništva 15 2.5. Migracije stanovništva 15 3. Pregled stanja i kretanja u lokalnoj ekonomiji 19 3.1. Broj i struktura preduzeća (po granama, po veličini) i 19 poreduzetničkih radnji 3.2. Kretanje ukupnih prihoda i rashoda, te prosječne plate po 23 granama djelatnosti 3.3. Spoljnotrgovinska razmjena i najznačajniji izvozni proizvodi i preduzeća 24 3.4. Veće investicije u privredi/gospodarstvu 26 3.5. Turistički potencijali i turistička infrastruktura 27 3.6. Poljoprivredni potencijali i proizvodi 28 4. Pregled stanja i kretanja na tržištu rada 33 4.1. Zaposleni (broj, polna, obrazovna i starosna struktura, udio u javnom i 33 privatnom sektoru, po granama, prema veličini poduzeća itd.) 4.2. Nezaposleni (broj, polna, obrazovna i starosna struktura, dužina čekanja itd.) 34 4.3. Penzioneri 36 5. Pregled stanja i kretanja u oblasti društvenog razvoja 37 5.1. Obrazovanje 37 5.2. Kultura i sport 41 5.3. Zdravstvena i socijalna zaštita 43 5.4. Stanovanje 46 5.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry Education in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    c e p s Journal | Vol.10 | No1 | Year 2020 83 doi: 10.26529/cepsj.715 Chemistry Education in Bosnia and Herzegovina Meliha Zejnilagić-Hajrić*1 and Ines Nuić2 • In this paper, the education system in Bosnia and Herzegovina is pre- sented in the light of current state-level legislation, with an emphasis on chemistry education at the primary, secondary and tertiary level. The consequences of the last war in our country still persist and are visible in many aspects of everyday life, including the education system, thus lim- iting the efforts of education professionals to follow international trends in education. There are three valid curricula for primary education at the national level, each of which differs in the national group of school subjects. Teaching methods are common for all three curricula and are mainly teacher-oriented. The situation is similar with regard to second- ary education. Study programmes at the university level are organised in accordance with the Bologna principles. The programmes are made by the universities themselves and approved by the corresponding ministry of education. Chemical education research in Bosnia and Herzegovina is mainly conducted at the University of Sarajevo. It deals with (1) the problems of experimental work in chemistry teaching, resulting in more than 60 experiments optimised for primary and secondary school, (2) integrating the knowledge of chemistry, physics and physical chemis- try for university students, with regard to students’ difficulties observed during university courses and potential solutions, and (3) the effective- ness of web-based learning material in primary school chemistry for the integration of macroscopic and submicroscopic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • MIGRANT PRESENCE 113 Locations Covered 31 Municipalities in 6
    MIGRANT PRESENCE OUTSIDE TEMPORARY RECEPTION CENTRES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA June 2021 ROUND 03 31 Municipalities 113 2,589 migrants in locations outside reception, 6 Cantons covered out of 2,591 identified in total On 10 June 2021, a third joint data collection exercise was conducted by IOM Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), with the Service for Foreigners’ Affairs1 (SFA), provide an estimation of the migrant and asylum seeker2 population (stock) present in the country and that are not accommodated or registered in any official Temporary Reception Centres (TRCs) at a given point in time. The data collection was implemented by ten teams for a total of 44 enumerators and 5 SFA staff, and carried out in six Cantons, for a total of 113 locations: 66 locations in 8 Municipalities in Una-Sana Canton, 24 locations in 10 Municipalities in Tuzla Canton, 10 locations in 5 Municipalities in Canton Sarajevo, 9 locations in 4 Municipalities in Herzegovina – Neretva Canton, 3 locations in 3 Municipalities in Canton 10, and 1 location in 1 Municipality in West Herzegovina Canton (see Map at p.2). DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE AND LOCALIZATION Out of 2,591 migrants without accommodation in TRCs, 2,266 The total number of migrants identified in the covered locations reported that they entered BiH from Serbia, 175 from was 2,591 out of which 2,589 stated that they were not Montenegro, and 127 from Croatia, while for 27 migrants this accommodated in any of official TRCs in BiH. information is unknown. Most migrants (2,248) entered BiH by foot, followed by other means of transportation such as bus rd The number of migrants observed in this 3 Round is in line (292), and taxi (25).
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Title: Support to Local and Regional Development In
    1 TITLE: SUPPORT TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Abstract: the abstract for paper no. 57 NAME: JASMINA OSMANAGIĆ, PHD Faculty of Economics, Sarajevo 71000 Sarajevo Phone: +387 33 27 59 19 E-mail: [email protected] Mirko Pejanović, PhD FPN University of Sarajevo 71000 Sarajevo Tel: 387 61 29 58 59 Klelija Balta UNDP 71000 Sarajevo Tel: 387 61 10 42 20 2 SUPPORT TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOSNIA AND ABSTRACT The paper is a review European Commission support for local and regional development in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1999 to 2006. In focus are The Quick Impact Facility Project Phase I (QIF 1) 1999-2002, European Union- Quick Impact Facility Project Phase II (EUQIF II) 2002-2004, European Union support for Regional Economic Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Phase I (EU RED I) 2004-2005 and Europe Union support for Regional Economic Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Phase II (EU RED II) 2005-2007). The paper contents background information, previous assistance, other related programmes, European Commission funded projects, non European Commission funded projects, definition on participants, target groups or beneficiaries, employed domicile populations, start situation, objectives, scope of work, methodology and approach, transparency, visibility, expected outputs and indicators, funds or budget, reporting, monitoring and evaluation. The paper presents knowledge transfer about local and regional theories and policies from experts European Commission to local experts. The paper shows funds. (Regional Development in Tuzla 1.2 Million Euro, Regional Development in Brcko 1.0 Million Euro, Mostar Economic Development 500.000 Euro, Sarajevo Economic Region 200.000 Euro, Quick Impact Facility 5.5 Million Euro, Foreign 3 Investment Promotion 1.0 Million Euro, European Fund 55 Million Euro, specific activities 3,200.000 Euro and Project Fund 3,800.000 Euro, EUQIF II about 3 Million Euro, etc) and benefits for EU and B&H.
    [Show full text]
  • Konačna Rang Lista Potencijalnih Korisnika Opština Bosansko Grahovo
    JAVNI POZIV 2019. FMROI - KONAČNA RANG LISTA POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA OPŠTINA BOSANSKO GRAHOVO Adresa sanacije Broj Rbr Prezime i ime Sadašnja adresa bodova Marinković (Radoslav) G. Principa bb, B. Grahovo 1. 220 Zvezdan G. Principa bb, B. Grahovo H. Abdičevića 19, B.Grahovo 2. Galić (Mile) Marko 190 H. Abdičevića 19, B.Grahovo Kesići bb, B. Grahovo 3. Damjanović (Ilija) Milica 180 Kesići bb, B. Grahovo Novo Naselje bb, B. Grahovo 4. Pavlović (Rade) Slavojka 170 Novo Naselje bb, B. Grahovo Pečenci bb, B. Grahovo 5. Prijić (Milenko) Slobodan 170 Pečenci bb, B. grahovo Resanovci bb, B. Grahovo 6. Lukač (Željko) Gojko 160 Resanovci bb, B. Grahovo Kesići bb, B. Grahovo 7. Damjanović (Mile) Želemir 160 Kesići bb, B. Grahovo Jaruga bb, B. Grahovo 8. Ivetić (Vaso) Brigite 160 Živojina Ćuluma 26, Zemun Dalmatinska bb, B. Grahovo 9. Kovačević (Dušan) Dragiša 150 Novo Naselje bb, B. Grahovo Braće Bajić 6, B. Grahovo 10. Maljković (Stevan) Ilija Braće Bajić 6, B. Grahovo 150 Pečenci bb, B. Grahovo 11. Arežina (Dušan) Jovo 150 Pečenci bb, B. Grahovo Ugarci bb, B. Grahovo 12. Lošić (Marko) Aleksandar 150 Ugarci bb, B. Grahovo JAVNI POZIV 2019. FMROI - KONAČNA RANG LISTA POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA OPŠTINA BOSANSKO GRAHOVO Livanjski put bb, B. Grahovo 13. Bašić (Uroš) Višnjica 150 Ugarci bb, B. Grahovo Pečenci bb, B. Grahovo 14. Momić (Todor) Milan 150 Pečenci bb, B. Grahovo Donji Tiškovac bb, B. Grahovo 15. Borovnica (Mile) Dragan 150 Donji Tiškovac bb, B. Grahovo Kninski Put bb, B. Grahovo 16. Reljić (Stevan) Mara 150 Kninski Put bb, B. Grahovo Tičevo bb, B. Grahovo 17.
    [Show full text]