DOCSLIB.ORG

RWL SEE Regional Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RWL SEE Regional Conference RWL SEE Regional Conference “Women in decision-making at local level / Role of Women mayors as potential agents of change” November 7th, 2016 / SEEU University, Tetovo, Macedonia INVITEE LIST SN Contact Person Place Title, Institution / Organization RWL SEE Steering Committee Members Minister for Dialogue, Kosovo Government; RWL 1 Edita Tahiri Kosovo SEE Chair President, Helsinki Committee for Human Rights; 2 Sonja Biserko Serbia RWL SEE Steering Committee Member, Serbia MP / President of the Committee for Gender 3 Gordana Sobol Croatia Equality, Parliament of Croatia; RWL SEE Steering Committee Member, Croatia Member (Former President), Women's Chapter of 4 Irina Pockova Macedonia SDA political party of Sv. Nikola; RWL SEE Steering Committee Member, Macedonia Bosnia & Executive Director "Źene Źenama"; RWL SEE 5 Memnuna Zvizdić Herzegovina Steering Committee Member, BiH MP, Head, Parliamentary Commission for Gender 6 Nada Drobnjak Montenegro Equality; RWL SEE Steering Committee Member, Montenegro Speaker (former Deputy Minister), Albanian Committee of Adoption, former Deputy Minister 7 Marieta Zaçe Albania for Social Welfare and Equal Opportunities; RWL SEE Steering Committee Member, Albania Women Mayors SEE Tetovo, 8 Teuta Arifi Mayor of Tetovo Macedonia Biljana Beličanec Kisela Voda, Mayor of Kisela Voda 9 Aleksik Macedonia Gradsko, Mayor of Gradsko 10 Zaneta Čausevska Macedonia Page | 1 Bogdanci, Mayor of Bodanci 11 Anastasija Olumćeva Macedonia Niksić, Mayor of Niksić 12 Sonja Nikčević Montenegro Tivat, Mayor of Tivat 13 Snezana Matijević Montenegro Herceg Novi, Mayor of Herceg Novi 14 Natasa Aćimović Montenegro Kolasin, Mayor of Kolasin 15 Zeljka Vuksanovic Montenegro Sarande, Vlore, Mayor of Saranda, Vlora 16 Florjana Koka Albania Patos, Fier, Mayor of Patos 17 Rajmonda Balili Albania 18 Voltana Ademi Shkoder, Albania Mayor of Shkodër Ura Vajgurore, Mayor of Ura Vajgurore, Berat 19 Juliana Memaj Berat, Albania Prrenjas, Mayor of Prrenjas, Elbasan 20 Miranda Rira Elbasan, Albania 21 Mimoza Kusari - Lila Gjakovë, Kosovo Mayor of Gjakova Smederevo, Mayor of Smederevo 22 Jasna Avramović Serbia 23 Dragana Mitrović Vrśac, Serbia Mayor of Vrśac 24 Dusanka Golubović Sombor, Serbia Mayor of Sombor 25 Tonka Ivčević Komiža, Croatia Mayor of Komiža Kraljevica, Mayor of Kraljevica Nada Turina-Đurić 26 Croatia 27 Kristina Ikić Baniček Sisak, Croatia Mayor of Sisak 28 Ivana Marković Supetar, Croatia Mayor of Supetar 29 Branka Martinčev Vodice, Croatia Mayor of Vodice 30 Amra Babić Visoko, BiH Mayor of Visoko Mrkonjić Grad, Mayor of Mrkonjić Grad, RS 31 Divna Aničić RS, BiH Page | 2 32 Milena Komlenović Kalinovik, RS, BiH Mayor of Kalinovik, RS 33 Snježana Ružičić Jezero, RS, BiH Mayor of Jezero, RS Novo Goražde, Mayor of Novo Goražde, RS Mila Petković 34 RS, BiH 35 Milka Ivanković Istočni Drvar, BiH Mayor of Istočni Drvar Key note speakers / Guests 36 Per Strand Sjaastad Kosovo / Norway Ambassador, Royal Norwegian Embassy, Pristina Head of the OSCE Mission in Kosovo Headquarters/ 37 Jan Braathu Kosovo / Norway Former Ambassador, Royal Norwegian Embassy Anne Huhtamäki, Kosovo / Finland 38 Ambassador, Embassy of Finland, Pristina 39 Henrik Nilsson Kosovo / Sweden Ambassador, Embassy of Sweden, Pristina Gernot Pfandler, Kosovo / Austria Ambassador / Head of Mission, Embassy of Austria, 40 Ambassador Pristina Siret Elezi Macedonia Minister, Ministry of Local Self Government, 41 Macedonia Skopje, UN Resident Coordinator and UNDP Resident 42 Louisa Vinton Macedonia Representative, Macedonia Frosina Tasevska- Macedonia Minister, Ministry of Labor and Social Policy, 43 Remenska Macedonia Macedonia Head of Department for equal opportunities, 44 Mirdita Saliu Ministry of Labor and Social Policy, Vienna, Austria Women without Boarders, Sisters against Violent 45 Dr Edit Schlaffer Extremism Washington, Director, International Center for the Study of Anne Speckhard, Ph.D. District of Violent Extremism (ICSVE) / Adjunct Associate 46 Columbia, USA Professor of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine Seoul, South 47 Sophia Kim International Women Peace Group Korea Seoul, South 48 Michelle Park International Women Peace Group Korea Kosovo General Secretary, Ministry of Local Government 49 Rozafa Ukimeraj Administration Macedonia Chairwoman of the Women Assembly, Movement 50 Arta Toci for Reform, ADP Page | 3 51 Merale Ferati Macedonia MP, Chairwoman, ADP 52 Drita Perezic Kosovo Senior Advisor, ICITAP 53 Savka Todorovska Macedonia President of the National Council of Women 54 Dinka Omanović Visoko, BiH Chief of Cabinet 55 Slagjana Doneva Macedonia Councilor of the municipality Kocani 56 Dilbera Kamberovska Macedonia President of the Romani Women’s Association 57 Aleksandra Lazarevska Macedonia Women’s association “Ezerka” - Struga Macedonia Association for the Advancement of Gender 58 Marija Savovska Equality “Akcija zdruzenska” 59 Damjan Zdravev Macedonia Platform for gender equality 60 Danica Petlickova Macedonia President “Klea” Women Civil Initiative, Bitola 61 Natasa Dimitrova Macedonia NSRR Washington, 62 Haris Fazilu ISCVE Research Columbia, USA 63 Dorina Grezda Gjakova, Kosovo Chief of Cabinet UN Women UN Women New 64 Alison Davidian SSA, Justice Specialist, Peace and Security York Policy Advisor on Governance, Peace and Security, 65 Sabine Freizer Istanbul, Turkey UN Women ECA Regional office, UN Women, 66 Flora Macula Head, UN Women, Kosovo Kosovo Prishtina UN Women, Gender Specialist / Head of Office UN Women, 67 Dominika Stojanoska Macedonia Macedonia UN Women / 68 Diana Cekaj-Berisha RWL SEE RWL SEE Coordinator RWL SEE / UN 69 Rebecka Frohm RWL SEE Intern Women UN Women, Senior Driver / Administrative Clerk, UN Women 70 Art Murtezai Kosovo Kosovo Page | 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alternative Report HRC Bosnia
    Written Information for the Consideration of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Second Periodic Report by the Human Rights Committee (CCPR/C/BIH/2) SEPTEMBER 2012 Submitted by TRIAL (Swiss Association against Impunity) Association of the Concentration Camp-Detainees Bosnia and Herzegovina Association of Detained – Association of Camp-Detainees of Brčko District Bosnia and Herzegovina Association of Families of Killed and Missing Defenders of the Homeland War from Bugojno Municipality Association of Relatives of Missing Persons from Ilijaš Municipality Association of Relatives of Missing Persons from Kalinovik (“Istina-Kalinovik ‘92”) Association of Relatives of Missing Persons of the Sarajevo-Romanija Region Association of Relatives of Missing Persons of the Vogošća Municipality Association Women from Prijedor – Izvor Association of Women-Victims of War Croatian Association of War Prisoners of the Homeland War in Canton of Central Bosnia Croatian Association of Camp-Detainees from the Homeland War in Vareš Prijedor 92 Regional Association of Concentration Camp-Detainees Višegrad Sumejja Gerc Union of Concentration Camp-Detainees of Sarajevo-Romanija Region Vive Žene Tuzla Women’s Section of the Association of Concentration Camp Torture Survivors Canton Sarajevo TRIAL P.O. Box 5116 CH-1211 Geneva 11 Tél/Fax: +41 22 3216110 [email protected] www.trial-ch.org CCP: 17-162954-3 CONTENTS Contents Paragraphs Background 1. Right to Life and Prohibition of Torture and Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, Remedies and Administration of Justice (Arts. 6,
    [Show full text]
  • Konjic – a Safe City Safe Community
    Konjic – a safe city Safe Community Application for approval as Safe Community in the Word Health Organisation’s Network of Safe Communities Draft version Contents Application for approval as Safe Community in the World Health Organization´s network of Safe Communities …………………………….……. 4 1. Konjic - municipality ……………………………………….……..…………….… 6 1.1. Description …………………………………………………………….………….… 6 1.2. Population …………………………………………………....…...…...………… … 7 1.3. Konjic municipality – organisation ……………………….…...…...……………..… 7 1.4. Emergency planning ……………………………………………….…………..…… 8 2. WHO’s indicators for Safe Communities …………………………………...… 9 3. Indicator 1 An infrastructure must be established based on community and cooperation which is controlled by a cross-sector group which is responsible for promoting security in the local community ……………………………………………...……… 10 4. Indicator 2 Long term sustainable programs must be prepared which cover both genders and all ages, environments and situations . ……………………………………..……… 13 4.1. Health centres and the school health service… ………..………..……..………..… 14 4.2. Schools ………………..……..……………….….…….…………………….……. 14 4.3. Health service for young people ……….……………………….………………… 15 4.4. Preventing the abuse of drugs and alcohol among young people ………...…..…… 15 4.5. Youth council ………………………………..…………………….…...…….….… 15 4.6. Preventive activities in the police ……………..……………..……………..….… 15 4.7. Campaigning against vandalism………….……………….…….……...………..… 16 4.8. Preventing injuries and accidents in elderly people …..………...……….…..…..… 16 4.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Governance Mapping in Albania 2020
    LOCAL GOVERNANCE MAPPING IN ALBANIA 2020 Funded by the European Union Governance Perception in a Reforming Albania Nationwide Local Governance Mapping in Albania 2020 AUTHORS IDRA Research & Consulting and Human Development Promotion Center (HDPC) Funded by the European Union Disclaimer STAR2 - Consolidation of Territorial and Administrative Reform - is a project funded by the European Union, Sweden, Italy, Switzerland, USAID, UNDP and the Government of Albania. The project's implementing partner is the Minister of Interior. The project is implemented by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) Oce in Albania. This report has been drafted in the framework of the above project by IDRA. The presented results are obtained from the calculation of the perceptions and evaluations expressed by the participants in the assessment, selected through the procedure described in the Methodology of this study. The views, comments and opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reect the views of the aforemen- tioned institutions. 4 LOCAL GOVERNANCE MAPPING IN ALBANIA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This report is funded by STAR2 and implemented by a consortium composed of IDRA Research & Consulting (leader), Human Development and Promo- tion Centre - HDPC (member – involved in data analysis and report writing) and Gender Alliance for Development Centre – GADC (member – involved in data collection). The report acknowledges the joint eorts of all organiza- tions involved. The authors would like to thank UNDP Albania local governance team, STAR2 project sta, the Ministry of Interior and the Agency for Support of Local Self-governance in Albania for their valuable guidance on the local governance mapping methodology, coordination with dierent central government and municipal stakeholders and helpful comments and suggestions throughout the exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • Kunarac Et Kovac
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA CASE NO.: IT-96-23-PT THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC RADOMIR KOVAC AMENDED INDICTMENT The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, pursuant to her authority under article 18 of the Statute of the Tribunal charges: DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC RADOMIR KOVAC with CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OR CUSTOMS OF WAR, as set forth below: BACKGROUND 1.1 The city and municipality of Foca are located south-east of Sarajevo, in the Republic of Bosnia- Herzegovina and borders Serbia and Montenegro. According to the 1991 census, the population of Foca consisting of 40,513 persons was 51.6 % Muslim, 45.3 % Serbian and 3.1% others. The political and military take-over of the municipality of Foca started with the first military actions in the town of Foca on 7 April 1992. The Serb forces, supported by artillery and heavy weapons, proceeded to take over Foca, section by section. The take-over of Foca town was complete by 16 or 17 April 1992. The surrounding villages continued to be under siege until mid- July 1992. 1.2 As soon as the Serb forces had taken over parts of Foca town, military police accompanied by local and non-local soldiers started arresting Muslim and Croat inhabitants. Until mid-July 1992 they continued to round up and arrest Muslim villagers from the surrounding villages in the municipality. The Serb forces separated men and women and unlawfully confined thousands of Muslims and Croats in various short and long-term detention facilities or kept them essentially under house arrest.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Peace in Bosnia Work Elizabeth M
    Cornell International Law Journal Volume 30 Article 10 Issue 3 Symposium 1997 Making Peace in Bosnia Work Elizabeth M. Cousens Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cousens, Elizabeth M. (1997) "Making Peace in Bosnia Work," Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 30: Iss. 3, Article 10. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol30/iss3/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell International Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Making Peace in Bosnia Work Elizabeth M. Cousens* This symposium asks "what makes peace agreements work" and specifically directs us to explore the degree to which and how "quasi- sovereigns" determine the answer. At a minimum, a peace agreement could be said to "work" when formerly warring parties honor their commitments more than they renege, and when a broader constituency develops within post-war society to support that agreement's basic provisions. Along both dimensions, the peace agreement providing the framework for politics in Bosnia today works haltingly at best.' The explanation for its inadequacies has very little to do with quasi-sovereignty, however. Rather, it has a great deal to do with the decisions and actions of the all-too-sovereign national governments and major international agencies that enjoy a disproportionate influence over the implementation of the peace agreement's key provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study for the Master Plan for Promoting the Mining Industry of Albania Final Report
    MINISTRY OF ECONOMY, TRADE AND ENERGY (METE) REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA THE STUDY FOR THE MASTER PLAN FOR PROMOTING THE MINING INDUSTRY OF ALBANIA FINAL REPORT November 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY MITSUBISHI MATERIALS TECHNO CORPORATION KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. IDD JR 10-151 PREFACE In response to a request from the Government of the Republic of Albania, the Government of Japan decided to conduct “The study for the Master Plan for Promoting the Mining Industry in Albania” and entrusted the study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA selected and dispatched a study team, headed by Mr. Yoshiaki Shibata of Mitsubishi Materials Techno Corporation, consisting of experts from Mitsubishi Materials Techno Corporation and Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd., for six times between a period from May 2009 to November 2010. The study team held discussion with the officials concerned of the Government of the Republic of Albania and conducted field study in Albania. Upon returning to Japan, the team conducted further studies and the final report was completed. I hope that this report will contribute to the promotion of mining development of the Republic of Albania and also to the enhancement of friendly relationship between two countries. Finally, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the officials concerned of the Government of the Republic of Albania for their close cooperation extended to the study. Ms. Kyoko Kuwajima Director General Industrial Development Department Japan International Cooperation Agency November 2010 November 2010 Ms. Kyoko Kuwajima Director General Industrial Development Department Japan International Cooperation Agency Letter of Transmittal Dear Sir, We are pleased to submit herewith the final report of “The Study of the Mater Plan for Promoting the Mining Industry of Albania”.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosna I Hercegovina Босна И Херцеговина Sud Bosne I
    Bosna i Hercegovina Босна и Херцеговина Sud Bosne i Hercegovine Суд Боснe и Херцеговинe Case No.: S1 1 K 005589 11 Kžk (Reference to: X-KRŽ-05/59) Date of publication: 11 July 2011 Before the Trial Panel comprised of: Senadin Begtašević, Presiding Judge Dragomir Vukoje, Judge Phillip Weiner, Judge PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. RADOJE LALOVIĆ AND SONIBOJ ŠKILJEVIĆ VERDICT OF THE APPELLATE PANEL Prosecutor of the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Behaija Krnjić Counsel for the Accused Radoje Lalović: Attorney Slaviša Prodanović Counsel for the Accused Soniboj Škiljević: Attorney Milorad Rašević Sud Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo, ul. Kraljice Jelene br. 88 Telefon: 033 707 100, 707 596; Fax: 033 707 225 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/543260/ Number: S1 1 K 005589 11 Kžk (Reference to X-KRŽ-05/59) Sarajevo, 5 July 2011 IN THE NAME OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA! The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Panel of the Appellate Division comprised of Judges Senadin Begtašević, as the President of the Panel, and judges Dragomir Vukoje and Phillip Weiner, as members of the Panel, with the participation of Legal Officer Nevena Aličehajić as the record- taker, in the criminal case against the Accused Radoje Lalović and Soniboj Škiljević, for the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), as read with subparagraphs a), c), e), f) and k) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CC of BiH), all in conjunction with Article 180(1) and Article 29 of the CC of BiH, upon the amended
    [Show full text]
  • Bosna I Hercegovina Federacija Bosne I Hercegovine Kanton 10 Opština Drvar Opštinski Razvojni Tim
    Bosna i Hercegovina Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine Kanton 10 Opština Drvar Opštinski razvojni tim STRATEGIJA RAZVOJA OPŠTINE DRVAR za period 2016 – 2020. godina Decembar, 2015. S A D R Ž A J SADRŽAJ 2 POPIS KORIŠTENIH SKRAĆENICA 4 UVOD 6 METODOLOGIJA IZRADE STRATEGIJE RAZVOJA 8 SOCIO EKONOMSKA ANALIZA OPŠTINE DRVAR 10 1. Geografski položaj i prirodne karakteristike 10 1.1. Ključne istorijske činjenice 10 1.2. Geografsko-komunikacijske karakteristike, prirodne odlike i resursi područja 10 2. Demografske karakteristike i kretanja 12 2.1. Ukupan broj stanovnika 12 2.2. Struktura stanovništva 13 2.3. Prostorni raspored stanovništva 14 2.4. Prirodni priraštaj stanovništva 15 2.5. Migracije stanovništva 15 3. Pregled stanja i kretanja u lokalnoj ekonomiji 19 3.1. Broj i struktura preduzeća (po granama, po veličini) i 19 poreduzetničkih radnji 3.2. Kretanje ukupnih prihoda i rashoda, te prosječne plate po 23 granama djelatnosti 3.3. Spoljnotrgovinska razmjena i najznačajniji izvozni proizvodi i preduzeća 24 3.4. Veće investicije u privredi/gospodarstvu 26 3.5. Turistički potencijali i turistička infrastruktura 27 3.6. Poljoprivredni potencijali i proizvodi 28 4. Pregled stanja i kretanja na tržištu rada 33 4.1. Zaposleni (broj, polna, obrazovna i starosna struktura, udio u javnom i 33 privatnom sektoru, po granama, prema veličini poduzeća itd.) 4.2. Nezaposleni (broj, polna, obrazovna i starosna struktura, dužina čekanja itd.) 34 4.3. Penzioneri 36 5. Pregled stanja i kretanja u oblasti društvenog razvoja 37 5.1. Obrazovanje 37 5.2. Kultura i sport 41 5.3. Zdravstvena i socijalna zaštita 43 5.4. Stanovanje 46 5.5.
    [Show full text]
  • ALBANIA by Walter G
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF ALBANIA By Walter G. Steblez1 Chromite, copper, ferrochromium, nickeliferrous iron ore, The environmental landscape of Albania is similar in kind, and petroleum refinery products were the chief mineral but not in degree, to that of other former centrally planned commodities that have been produced in Albania and, which economy countries of Eastern Europe that were former until recently, constituted the major component of foreign members of the CMEA. The more serious point sources of exchange earnings. From 1945 until 1991, Albania's industry environmental pollution were industrial sites, such as mining, and general economy developed under a system of central beneficiation, smelting and refining complexes (chromite, economic planning. During this period, the Government copper, iron ore, etc.), the Elbasan iron and steel plant, primarily focused its efforts on establishing and maintaining petroleum refineries, lignite-fired thermal electric power maximum economic self-sufficiency. Industry was developed stations, and chemical plants.2 With technology even further largely without reference to the world market, but in out of date than that at similar facilities in former CMEA accordance with policies and economic structures dictated to countries, Albania's industrial facilities were not only less all former member-countries of the Council for Mutual efficient than those in other Eastern European countries, but Economic Assistance (CMEA) by the former Soviet Union also more polluting. The chief distinction between heavy (FSU). Albania was an active member of CMEA until 1961, industry in Albania and that in other former Eastern although subsequently the country became inactive in this European members of the CMEA was that of scale, with organization because of political differences with the FSU.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Heritage of Librazhd‟S District, in Function of the Stable Development
    European Scientific Journal September 2014 /SPECIAL/ edition Vol.2 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 THE NATURAL HERITAGE OF LIBRAZHD‟S DISTRICT, IN FUNCTION OF THE STABLE DEVELOPMENT Qamil Lirëza University "A.Xhuvani" Elbasan, Department of History and Geography, Albania Abstract During the treatment of this paper it is aimed the accurate characterization of natural objects that constitute the natural heritage of this region, as well as the proposals for new monuments. In this article it is conducted a genuine scientific work for the analysis of these monuments and the values associated with them. The basic method that is used in the treatment of this paper has been the one of direct field observations, analyzing these aspects; their physical condition, size, prognosis and photography. The paper has scientific value to researchers in the field of geography and local authorities. The main part in the paper is occupied by the results of the performed work in the following areas: The assessment of the natural conditions of this district, in function ofthe natural monuments. The classification of natural monuments; geomonuments, bio and hidromonuments. The physical analysis of the declared monuments,explaining their current situation and future trend.Their association with different views. Proposals for new natural monuments, for those objects that meet the criteria of being such. All these proposed monuments, are analyzed by the natural aspect, and accompanied by photos. At the end of this paper are given the conclusions, noting that the natural heritage of this district is a national asset. There are given some recommendations such as; their defence is responsibility of the state and of all the public opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Marginalized Population Support Program / PPMG
    2018 PORTFOLIO REVIEW (#3) ACTIVITY REPORT REPORTING PERIOD: December 2016- December 2017 ACTIVITY NAME: Marginalized Population Support Program / PPMG ACTIVITY OVERVIEW Activity Purpose: . Individuals and CSOs representing underrepresented groups are constructively engaged in civic/political issues, will ensure that the government recognizes them as necessary and respectable partners in policy development. The Development Hypothesis: . Constructive engagement in civic/political issues of individuals and CSOs representing underrepresented groups will be achieved by supporting the activities of groups of local organizations that advocate for the rights and dignity of underrepresented groups, building capacities of local NGOs and USAID implementing partners and providing grants to local CSOs that provide services to beneficiaries. Implementing Partner: . Institute for Youth Development KULT Activity Website: . Yes; url: www.ppmg.ba Activity Facebook page: . Yes, url: https://www.facebook.com/ppmg.ba/ COR/AOR: Elvira Challenger COP Name: Jasmin Bešić Key Partners/Other Donors: NGO & BA d.o.o. Start /End Date: February, 2015 / February, 2020 Total Estimated Cost: 3,4 mil. USD Obligated Amount: 3,178,044.67 USD Mortgage: RESULTS ACHIEVED The Activity’s highest-level result statement: Increased citizen’s participation in governance. Contribution to Project log frame indicators (list the log frame indicators that this activity is contributing to, the targets, and the FY17 Results): Indicator Activity Targets for FY17 Activity Results for FY17*
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Title: Support to Local and Regional Development In
    1 TITLE: SUPPORT TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Abstract: the abstract for paper no. 57 NAME: JASMINA OSMANAGIĆ, PHD Faculty of Economics, Sarajevo 71000 Sarajevo Phone: +387 33 27 59 19 E-mail: [email protected] Mirko Pejanović, PhD FPN University of Sarajevo 71000 Sarajevo Tel: 387 61 29 58 59 Klelija Balta UNDP 71000 Sarajevo Tel: 387 61 10 42 20 2 SUPPORT TO LOCAL AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN BOSNIA AND ABSTRACT The paper is a review European Commission support for local and regional development in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1999 to 2006. In focus are The Quick Impact Facility Project Phase I (QIF 1) 1999-2002, European Union- Quick Impact Facility Project Phase II (EUQIF II) 2002-2004, European Union support for Regional Economic Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Phase I (EU RED I) 2004-2005 and Europe Union support for Regional Economic Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Phase II (EU RED II) 2005-2007). The paper contents background information, previous assistance, other related programmes, European Commission funded projects, non European Commission funded projects, definition on participants, target groups or beneficiaries, employed domicile populations, start situation, objectives, scope of work, methodology and approach, transparency, visibility, expected outputs and indicators, funds or budget, reporting, monitoring and evaluation. The paper presents knowledge transfer about local and regional theories and policies from experts European Commission to local experts. The paper shows funds. (Regional Development in Tuzla 1.2 Million Euro, Regional Development in Brcko 1.0 Million Euro, Mostar Economic Development 500.000 Euro, Sarajevo Economic Region 200.000 Euro, Quick Impact Facility 5.5 Million Euro, Foreign 3 Investment Promotion 1.0 Million Euro, European Fund 55 Million Euro, specific activities 3,200.000 Euro and Project Fund 3,800.000 Euro, EUQIF II about 3 Million Euro, etc) and benefits for EU and B&H.
    [Show full text]