MPD150 Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Operation Safety Net Update
Operation Safety Net Update April 2, 2021 Operation Safety Net is a coordinated effort to ensure the safety of the public during the trial of Derek Chauvin. The organizations participating in Operation Safety Net are committed to protecting people, property, and freedom of speech. STATUS No identified specific or credible threats reported for Minnesota. Approximately 200 service members from the Minnesota National Guard are deployed in Minneapolis and Saint Paul. As part of Operation Safety Net, the National Guard is helping to ensure the security of critical infrastructure and safeguarding the integrity of the judicial process. OSN SOCIAL MEDIA HIGHLIGHTS We are thankful for Bishop Richard Howell’s leadership and insight as we keep our community safe while allowing people to express their First Amendment rights. We will continue to meet with faith leaders in the Twin Cities as Derek Chauvin’s trial continues. #MNOSN #ChauvinTrial We have been getting questions about the best number to call to report suspicious activity or an emergency. • 911: Life safety emergencies requiring police, fire or EMS. • 612-673-5335: Tips to @MinneapolisPD about suspicious activity not requiring an immediate response. #MNOSN Thousands of people rely on public transportation each day. Their livelihoods depend on it. @MetroTransitMN Police Chief Eddie Frizell asks demonstrators not to block transit platforms. #MNOSN #OperationSafetyNet #ChauvinTrial COMMON QUESTIONS Why this level of security? o Extremist groups may view the trial as an opportunity to do harm. Threats could include individuals with a radicalized ideology intent on disrupting the trial or seizing an opportunity to do harm. This level of security is necessary to ensure the trial can occur and that those who gather are safe. -
Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway ................................................................................. -
DECLARATION of BRYAN EDELMAN, Ph.D. I, Bryan Edelman, Solemnly, Sincerely and Truly Declare and Affirm As Follows: I
27-CR-20-12646 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 3/18/2021 5:27 PM DECLARATION OF BRYAN EDELMAN, Ph.D. I, Bryan Edelman, solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm as follows: I. INTRODUCTION I am the co-founder of Trial Innovations, Inc., a national full-service jury research firm. I have worked as a trial consultant for 20 years and have conducted pretrial and post-trial research on both criminal and civil cases across the country. In addition, I have been retained as an expert in over 40 high-profile cases to assess the impact of pretrial publicity on the fairness of the trial proceedings. Counsel for the defendant in State of Minnesota v. Alex Kueng retained me to evaluate the extent and nature of the pretrial publicity covering the death of George Floyd and its potential impact on Mr. Kueng’s due process rights. As part of my analysis, I reviewed relevant newspaper coverage, television publicity, and social media content. It is my opinion that the jury pool in Hennepin County has been saturated with extensive prejudicial news coverage. The pretrial publicity incorporates powerful and emotional language surrounding the death of George Floyd, minute-by-minute accounts of how the tragic incident unfolded, shocking video footage of the encounter, and details from pretrial filings (e.g., autopsy reports). The coverage references prejudicial statements from prominent public figures. For example, the Chief of Police described the incident as “murder.” These types of statements have the capacity to undermine the burden of proof by creating a presumption of guilt within members of the jury pool. -
Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety in North Minneapolis: an After-Action Assessment of the Police Response To
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING SERVICES CRITICAL RESPONSE INITIATIVE MAINTAINING FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND PUBLIC SAFETY IN NORTH MINNEAPOLIS An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct Frank Straub | Hassan Aden | Jeffrey Brown | Ben Gorban | Rodney Monroe | Jennifer Zeunik This project was supported by grant number 2015-CK-WX-K005 awarded by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues. The Internet references cited in this publication were valid as of the date of publication. Given that URLs and websites are in constant flux, neither the author(s) nor the COPS Office can vouch for their current validity. Recommended citation: Straub, Frank, Hassan Aden, Jeffrey Brown, Ben Gorban, Rodney Monroe, and Jennifer Zeunik. 2017. Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety in North Minneapolis: An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Published 2017 CONTENTS Letter from the Director . .vi Executive Summary . vii Summary of events vii Implications and challenges vii Public safety response vii Key themes of the review viii Conclusion ix Part I . -
PCOC Orientation Presentation
PCOC Commissioner Orientation Police Conduct Oversight Commission February 16th, 2020 Orientation Overview • Introduction • Historical Overview of the OPCR & PCOC • Role of Oversight Bodies • PCOC Purpose & Function • PCOC Research & Study Process • PCOC Subcommittee Overview & Functions • Discussion Forum: Q&A Session • PCOC Partners: City Attorney & City Clerk • MN Data Practices Act • Open Meeting Laws • Ethics Training 2 OPCR Leadership & Structure • Director Imani Jaafar, Esq. – 5 years as OPCR Director • 16 years in legal practice • Recognition: • Achievement in oversight award from the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement • Outstanding advocate award from Minnesota Justice Foundation • Minnesota Super Lawyers Rising Star • Minnesota Lawyer Up and Coming Attorney • Judge Varco Pro Bono Services Award • Adjunct professor of law at University of Minnesota • Diversity trainer and consultant focused on teaching professionals how to disrupt bias when working with Muslim communities both locally and nationally. • Prior Roles: • Housing staff attorney at Mid-Minnesota Legal Assistance • Assistant Ramsey County Public Defender • Private attorney specializing in both Islamic estate planning and criminal defense • Law clerk to the Honorable Lloyd Zimmerman in the Fourth Judicial District. 3 PCOC Guest Panelists • Former PCOC Chair Andrea Brown • January 2014 – December 2019 • Former PCOC Vice-Chair Jennifer Singleton • January 2014 – December 2018 4 History of Minneapolis Police Oversight • Civilian Review Authority • January 1990 – Created by Minneapolis Ordinance • June 1997 – City Council places the CRA within the City Coordinators Office and requests study of multiple redesign areas • 2002 – City Council closes CRA office and begins redesign process • Following Council approval, a redesigned CRA begins operations within the Department of Civil Rights in 2003 • 2006 – Multiple studies and working groups propose and implement changes to CRA ordinances in an effort to improve processes. -
Snelling Avenue, Minneapolis
SNELLING AVENUE, MINNEAPOLIS: RESEARCH ON THE HISTORY OF THE AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY WORKS MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 2009 SNELLING AVENUE, MINNEAPOLIS: RESEARCH ON THE HISTORY OF THE AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY Prepared for Hennepin County Community Works and the Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Strategic Development Framework Hennepin County, Minneapolis, Minnesota by Carole S. Zellie Landscape Research LLC St. Paul, Minnesota 2009 Typical houses and their grain-elevator backdrop: the 3900 block of Snelling Avenue, 2008. Minneapolis’ late 19th-century African American population was small in number; the 1870 census recorded only 160 individuals.1 By 1900, the number rose to 2,592, reached 4,176 by 1930, and 4,646 in 1940. During this period “black people resided in every ward in the city, but the majority were . concentrated in the area of Nicollet Avenue and 10th Street.”2 The Seven Corners area near Washington and Cedar Avenues (much of which is now covered by I-35W and other development) comprised another settlement. The settlement concentration subsequently shifted toward north Minneapolis, into areas being vacated by Jews.3 African American families were among the first to settle in the neighborhood that grew south of E. Lake Street along the Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul (CM&StP) rail corridor. Snelling Avenue, with adjacent portions of Minnehaha and Hiawatha Avenues, became one of relatively few areas of early 20th-century Minneapolis where African Americans established a long-term community with a high rate of home ownership. Snelling Avenue, today a small part of the Longfellow neighborhood, developed with tall elevators and mills as its noisy neighborhood backdrop; small factories were also placed between houses at the northern edge of the area. -
United States District Court District of Minnesota
CASE 0:20-cv-01645 Document 1 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Nekima Levy Armstrong, Marques Armstrong, Terry Hempfling, and Rachel Clark, On behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. ______________ City of Minneapolis, Minneapolis Chief of Police JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Medaria Arradondo in his individual and official capacity; Minneapolis Police Lieutenant Robert Kroll, in his individual and official capacity; COMPLAINT Minnesota Department of Public Safety Commissioner John Harrington, in his individual and official capacity; Minnesota State Patrol Colonel Matthew Langer, in his individual and official capacity; and John Does 1-2, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. For their Complaint, Plaintiffs state and allege as follows: INTRODUCTION The right to assemble is fundamental, as is the right to speak out against injustice. These rights are enshrined in our Constitution. Ideas and movements that changed the course of our history came to the forefront of the American consciousness through assembly and protest. Law enforcement too often has been on the wrong side of history, attempting to suppress the right of the people to assemble. This freedom cannot be suppressed and it must be protected at all costs. Minnesota is no exception. Historically, law enforcement in Minneapolis specifically, and Minnesota more generally, have attempted to suppress the right of its citizens to assemble peacefully. Recently, they have been and are actively suppressing this right by exercising CASE 0:20-cv-01645 Document 1 Filed 07/28/20 Page 2 of 32 unnecessary and excessive force against protesters who gathered to express their outrage at the murder of George Floyd at the hands of the Minneapolis Police Department. -
MAIBA Statement Re George Floyd
Minnesota American Indian Bar Association P.O. Box 3712, Minneapolis, MN 55403 www.maiba.org May 29, 2020 FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The Minnesota American Indian Bar Association ("MAIBA") condemns the actions of Minneapolis Police Department Officers Derek Chauvin, Thomas Lane, Tou Thao, and J. Alexander Kueng that led to the murder of George Floyd and calls for action to be taken against all of the officers by the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office. Sadly, George Floyd’s family and the world have repeatedly witnessed the death of Mr. Floyd which was captured on multiple video recordings. After Mr. Floyd was restrained and handcuffed, Derek Chauvin kneeled on Mr. Floyd’s neck with his full weight. Mr. Floyd begged him to stop and struggled for air as he mustered out the words, “I can’t breathe!” over and over again. After his body was limp and he could not possibly pose a threat to any person, Chauvin continued to kneel with his full weight on Mr. Floyd’s neck for several more minutes which led to his death. The other three officers stood by while Chauvin mercilessly ended the life of George Floyd. Police officers are not above the law. Although the officers involved were rightfully terminated, they should have been immediately arrested for their egregious and homicidal actions. Decades upon decades of systematic racism, violence, and unanswered pleas for justice have led to our citizens to take action. The City of Minneapolis and surrounding communities are smoldering literally with fire and metaphorically with the frustration and pain of the community that knows no person could kill a man by kneeling on his neck and walk away free, unless that person happens to be a Minneapolis Police Officer. -
Living with the Mississippi: the Bohemian Flats
LIVING WITH THE MISSISSIPPI By Rachel Hines “Living with the Mississippi” is a blog series that examines the history of the river flats communities and what it means to almost literally live on the Mississippi River. Follow along to learn more about life on the Mississippi prior to luxury con- dos and clean river water, before the riverfront was considered a desirable place to live. First published online for River Life at http://riverlife.umn.edu/rivertalk in December, 2014 with comments by Pat Nunnally, River Life. LIVING WITH THE MISSISSIPPI THE BOHEMIAN FLATS by Rachel Hines In 1869, Minneapolis had been a city for only two years, later, in 1941, the Writer’s Project of the Works Progress and the first settlers had just arrived at the Bohemian Administration published a book about the Bohemian Flats Flats- a Danish couple.[1] The community’s population grew which painted a picture of an idyllic, Old World community. to include over 1,000 residents, until it began to dwindle The flats appeared diverse and inclusive, a place for resi- around 1900 due to commercial development at the dents of all ethnic origins to escape the busy life of the city, riverfront. In 1923, many of the residents were evicted from a retreat where traditional customs were maintained. This their homes to make way for a Municipal Barge Terminal, book has fostered an air of nostalgia and romance around and in 1931, most of the remaining community was asked the settlement. to leave as well, leaving only fourteen homes. Just ten years “Boys Rowing Boat Down Street in Bohemian Flats, Minneapolis.” Courtesy of the Minnesota Historical Society, Taken in 1898, Photographer Unknown. -
Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING SERVICES CRITICAL RESPONSE INITIATIVE MAINTAINING FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND PUBLIC SAFETY IN NORTH MINNEAPOLIS An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct Frank Straub | Hassan Aden | Jeffrey Brown | Ben Gorban | Rodney Monroe | Jennifer Zeunik This project was supported by grant number 2015-CK-WX-K005 awarded by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues. The Internet references cited in this publication were valid as of the date of publication. Given that URLs and websites are in constant flux, neither the author(s) nor the COPS Office can vouch for their current validity. Recommended citation: Straub, Frank, Hassan Aden, Jeffrey Brown, Ben Gorban, Rodney Monroe, and Jennifer Zeunik. 2017. Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety in North Minneapolis: An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Published 2017 CONTENTS Letter from the Director . .vi Executive Summary . vii Summary of events vii Implications and challenges vii Public safety response vii Key themes of the review viii Conclusion ix Part I . -
Phase Ii Architectural History Investigation for the Proposed Central Transit Corridor, Hennepin and Ramsey Counties, Minnesota
PHASE II ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED CENTRAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR, HENNEPIN AND RAMSEY COUNTIES, MINNESOTA Submitted to: Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority Submitted by: The 106 Group Ltd. September 2004 PHASE II ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED CENTRAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR, HENNEPIN AND RAMSEY COUNTIES, MINNESOTA SHPO File No. 96-0059PA The 106 Group Project No. 02-34 Submitted to: Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority 665 Ramsey County Government Center West 50 West Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55102 Submitted by: The 106 Group Ltd. The Dacotah Building 370 Selby Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102 Project Manager: Anne Ketz, M.A., RPA Principal Investigator Betsy H. Bradley, Ph.D. Report Authors Betsy H. Bradley, Ph.D. Jennifer L. Bring, B.A. Andrea Vermeer, M.A., RPA September 2004 Central Transit Corridor Phase II Architectural History Investigation Page i MANAGEMENT SUMMARY From May to August of 2004, The 106 Group Ltd. (The 106 Group) conducted a Phase II architectural history investigation for the Central Transit Corridor (Central Corridor) project in Minneapolis, Hennepin County, and St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The proposed project is a multi-agency undertaking being led by the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority (RCRRA). The Phase II investigation was conducted under contract with the RCRRA. The proposed action is a Light Rail Transit (LRT) or Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) facility for the Central Corridor, a transportation corridor that extends approximately 11 miles between downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul, Minnesota. The project will be receiving federal permitting and funding, along with state funding, and, therefore, must comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and with applicable state laws. -
Download As PDF (Compressed: Smaller File, Lower Quality)
EXPANDED EDITION (2020) ENOUGH IS ENOUGH A 150-YEAR PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT EXPANDED EDITION SUMMER 2020 CONTENTS The Enough Is Enough Report (originally published in 2017) • Introduction: p.7 • Where We’ve Been: p.8 • Where We’re At: p.18 • Where We’re Going: p.29 • MPD150’s Five Essential Findings: p.37 Expanded Edition Resources • Handouts, zines, and outreach materials: p.38 • Educator toolkit: sample activities and discussion questions: p.54 • Poems, editorials, and other writing: p.58 • Timeline pieces: p.74 “Community Policing and Other Fairy Tales” Comic Book: p.86 An Oral History of the MPD150 Project: p.128 Acknowledgments: p.141 FOREWORD TO THE 2020 EXPANDED EDITION This new, expanded version of the “Enough Is Enough” report was scheduled to be released in spring of 2020. On May 25, 2020, George Floyd was murdered by three Minneapolis police officers as one stood guard. The writing in this report was done primarily between 2016 and 2019, and was first released in 2017. This expanded edition is being released in summer 2020, while the shockwaves from the May uprising are still spreading. We don’t know when you’ll be reading this, but we know that our city will never be the same. As a city, our grief, our rage, our fire, and our frustration are expressions of deep truths. We acknowledge that none of them are new; Black, brown, and Indigenous peoples have carried the oppressive weight of this racist system, and the violence of its police enforcers, since the beginning. We also acknowledge that our connection, our love, our determination, and our solidarity are also our truths, are also necessary, and light our path ahead.