PCOC Orientation Presentation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PCOC Orientation Presentation PCOC Commissioner Orientation Police Conduct Oversight Commission February 16th, 2020 Orientation Overview • Introduction • Historical Overview of the OPCR & PCOC • Role of Oversight Bodies • PCOC Purpose & Function • PCOC Research & Study Process • PCOC Subcommittee Overview & Functions • Discussion Forum: Q&A Session • PCOC Partners: City Attorney & City Clerk • MN Data Practices Act • Open Meeting Laws • Ethics Training 2 OPCR Leadership & Structure • Director Imani Jaafar, Esq. – 5 years as OPCR Director • 16 years in legal practice • Recognition: • Achievement in oversight award from the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement • Outstanding advocate award from Minnesota Justice Foundation • Minnesota Super Lawyers Rising Star • Minnesota Lawyer Up and Coming Attorney • Judge Varco Pro Bono Services Award • Adjunct professor of law at University of Minnesota • Diversity trainer and consultant focused on teaching professionals how to disrupt bias when working with Muslim communities both locally and nationally. • Prior Roles: • Housing staff attorney at Mid-Minnesota Legal Assistance • Assistant Ramsey County Public Defender • Private attorney specializing in both Islamic estate planning and criminal defense • Law clerk to the Honorable Lloyd Zimmerman in the Fourth Judicial District. 3 PCOC Guest Panelists • Former PCOC Chair Andrea Brown • January 2014 – December 2019 • Former PCOC Vice-Chair Jennifer Singleton • January 2014 – December 2018 4 History of Minneapolis Police Oversight • Civilian Review Authority • January 1990 – Created by Minneapolis Ordinance • June 1997 – City Council places the CRA within the City Coordinators Office and requests study of multiple redesign areas • 2002 – City Council closes CRA office and begins redesign process • Following Council approval, a redesigned CRA begins operations within the Department of Civil Rights in 2003 • 2006 – Multiple studies and working groups propose and implement changes to CRA ordinances in an effort to improve processes. • 2008 – A external review of MPD Internal Affairs Unit (IAU) operations included the recommendation that MPD should make efforts to work within the CRA’s specific investigation requirements, in addition to those of IAU. 5 History of Minneapolis Police Oversight • Minnesota House of Representatives & Senate • February 2012 – Legislation introduced to change oversight of law enforcement (House Bill) (Senate Bill) • Amends the Peace Officer Discipline Procedures Act (the "Act"). Eliminates the statutory exemption from compliance with the Act that the legislature granted to the Minneapolis Civilian Police Review Authority. (The exemption has been in place since the law was enacted in 1991.) • Prohibits civilian review authorities from: (1) making binding findings of fact or determinations about police complaints, and (2) imposing discipline on peace officers. Civilian review authorities may make advisory recommendations about police misconduct complaints. • March 2012 – Legislation signed by Governor • August 2012 – Legislative changes go into effect 6 History of Minneapolis Police Oversight • Office of Police Conduct Review • July 2012 – Potential process presented to City Council, including adaptations to comply with changes in MN Statute § 626.89, subd. 2 • August 2012 – Three community feedback sessions held on proposed changes, resulting in the following modifications: • Increasing the filing timeline for police misconduct complaints from 180 days to 270 days • Created compulsory mediation for officers and complainants – if complaint requests • Included residency as a requirement for panel members • Added requirement for the Chief of Police to include a memo regarding any disciplinary decisions • Clarified how long the Chief has to make disciplinary decisions • September 2012 – Proposed new structure approved by City Council, creating the Office of Police Conduct Review 7 History of Minneapolis Police Oversight • Office of Police Conduct Review • February 2013 – Minneapolis Police Conduct Review Panel begins reviewing cases • October 2013 – Police Conduct Oversight Commission holds inaugural meeting • January 2014 – OPCR begins working with PCOC on research & study projects • March 2017 – Launch of OPCR data dashboard, including officer history search function • December 2017 – Minneapolis oversight ordinance strengthened to codify OPCR access to MPD data for the purposes of conducting investigations, research & study projects, and programmatic reviews 8 Roles of Minneapolis Police Oversight Bodies . Receipt and screening of complaints . Intake, preliminary, and administrative investigations . Preliminary investigator based on preference of complainant . Conduct programmatic audits and research . Each panel consists of 2 civilian & 2 sworn . Conduct research and study audits related to MPD . Review case file in advance practice, internal controls, compliance, etc. Preponderance of the evidence standard . Make recommendations to elected officials based on Merit; no merit; remand findings of research and study projects . Create and implement a community outreach strategy 9 PCOC Purpose & Functions • Police Conduct Oversight Commission - Minneapolis Code of Ordinances – 172.80 • Conduct programs of research and study, in conjunction with office of police conduct review staff appointed by the director of the office of police conduct review. • Collect, review and audit summary data and compile aggregate statistics relating to programs of research and study • Make recommendations to the city council, mayor, and/or chief of police relating to Minneapolis Police Department practices, internal controls, compliance with applicable law and regulation relating to police policy and procedure and other related matters contained within a program of research and study. • Facilitate outreach and training as a result of the research and study process. • Contribute to the performance review of the chief of police. • Create and implement a community outreach program and coordinate outreach activities with the Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights. • Submit periodic reports to the public safety subcommittee of the city council regarding the activities of the commission. • Establish, amend and repeal rules and procedures governing its own internal organization and operations in a manner and form consistent with this Code. • Form subcommittees to assist in fulfilling its duties and responsibilities. • Request from the mayor and city council the appointment of such staff as is necessary to carry out the duties of the commission. 10 PCOC Research & Study • PCOC Research & Study – Ordinance Language • (1) Conduct programs of research and study, in conjunction with office of police conduct review staff appointed by the director of the office of police conduct review. Research and study includes programs that analyze Minneapolis Police Department practices, internal controls, compliance with applicable law and regulation relating to police policy and procedure and other related matters, to ensure that police services are delivered in a lawful, effective, and nondiscriminatory manner for the purpose of ascertaining how the objectives of this chapter may be attained and sustained. • PCOC Research & Study Process Manual (PDF) • Established in 2017 • Provides structured process and lifecycle of a potential research and study project • Divides process into four phases • Project Formation and Initial Survey • Methodology Development • Fieldwork and Report Drafting • Final Report and Recommendations 11 PCOC Research & Study Examples • Investigative Stops Documentation Review (PDF) • Data analysis and recommendations regarding the MPD practices in recording and reporting investigative or “Terry” stops, including the grounds for such stops, demographic information of those stopped, and the location of stops. • Evictions and Calls for Service (PDF) • This study explores the intersection of police calls for service and evictions (both formal and through notices to vacate). It provides an analysis of the implementation of the Conduct on Licensed Premises Ordinance. • MPD Body Camera Policy Study (PDF) • This study looked at national best practices, policies of other departments, and community input on body camera use and policy by the Minneapolis Police Department. The report includes a recommended policy for the use of body cameras by the MPD. • Domestic Violence Response Research and Study (PDF) • This study looks at response to domestic violence calls by the Minneapolis Police Department. • Officer Interactions with Mental Health Issues: A Policy Study (PDF) • This study looks at current national best practices and current Minneapolis Police Department policies for officer interactions with those experiencing mental health crises and makes policy and programmatic recommendations for improving such interactions. • Complete Research and Study Library: PCOC Report Library 12 PCOC Subcommittee Overview • The PCOC Chair is responsible for the assignment of members to various subcommittees, as the demand or need for these groups dictates. • PCOC Subcommittees: • Policy and Procedure Committee • Audit Committee • Outreach Committee • Rules & Governance Committee 13 Discussion Forum: Q&A Session 14 PCOC Partners • City Attorney’s Office • Advises on legal matters as needed and appropriate • Requests for CAO legal opinions should come through the Chair and OPCR staff • City Clerk’s Office • Provides meeting management and general administrative support 15
Recommended publications
  • Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
    RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety in North Minneapolis: an After-Action Assessment of the Police Response To
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING SERVICES CRITICAL RESPONSE INITIATIVE MAINTAINING FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND PUBLIC SAFETY IN NORTH MINNEAPOLIS An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct Frank Straub | Hassan Aden | Jeffrey Brown | Ben Gorban | Rodney Monroe | Jennifer Zeunik This project was supported by grant number 2015-CK-WX-K005 awarded by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues. The Internet references cited in this publication were valid as of the date of publication. Given that URLs and websites are in constant flux, neither the author(s) nor the COPS Office can vouch for their current validity. Recommended citation: Straub, Frank, Hassan Aden, Jeffrey Brown, Ben Gorban, Rodney Monroe, and Jennifer Zeunik. 2017. Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety in North Minneapolis: An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Published 2017 CONTENTS Letter from the Director . .vi Executive Summary . vii Summary of events vii Implications and challenges vii Public safety response vii Key themes of the review viii Conclusion ix Part I .
    [Show full text]
  • MPD150 Report
    a 150 year performance review of the minneapolis police department mpd150 TOTHOSE WHO'VE LEDTHE WAY The initiative that we have named MPD150 stands on the shoulders of the activists and organizers, community organizations and street protesters, whistleblowers, families of loved ones lost to police violence and the numerous others who have led the fight for truly safe communities in the past and still today. Their contributions over the years have made this undertaking possible. For this we honor them. MPD150 is an independent association of organizers, activists, researchers, and artists that came together in the spring of 2016 in anticipation of the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD)'s 150th anniversary. We are not the project of any organization, although we recognize the contributions many of them have made over the years. Some of them have shared leads and material for this report. Enough is Enough is one component of a multi­ faceted effort that includes public art, educational activities, political action, cultural activism, and more. We hope to inspire and support new community initiatives that contribute to a shared vision of a police-free future. TABLEOF CONTENTS 1: Intro ......................................... 3 2: Where We've Been .................... 4 3: Where We're At ........................ 14 4: Where We're Going .................. 25 5: Findings ................................... 33 6: Credits ..................................... 35 M PD 150 Enough is Enough! Enough is Enough! That is both the The US police system, we contend, is not outlines of the police-free communities conclusion and the title of this report, reformable. Efforts to reform it - aimed of the future. We have no shortage of a 150-year performance review of at addressing recruitment, training, ancient cultural traditions, innovative the Minneapolis Police Department discipline, oversight and transparency social programs, and community (MPD).
    [Show full text]
  • Snelling Avenue, Minneapolis
    SNELLING AVENUE, MINNEAPOLIS: RESEARCH ON THE HISTORY OF THE AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY WORKS MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 2009 SNELLING AVENUE, MINNEAPOLIS: RESEARCH ON THE HISTORY OF THE AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY Prepared for Hennepin County Community Works and the Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Strategic Development Framework Hennepin County, Minneapolis, Minnesota by Carole S. Zellie Landscape Research LLC St. Paul, Minnesota 2009 Typical houses and their grain-elevator backdrop: the 3900 block of Snelling Avenue, 2008. Minneapolis’ late 19th-century African American population was small in number; the 1870 census recorded only 160 individuals.1 By 1900, the number rose to 2,592, reached 4,176 by 1930, and 4,646 in 1940. During this period “black people resided in every ward in the city, but the majority were . concentrated in the area of Nicollet Avenue and 10th Street.”2 The Seven Corners area near Washington and Cedar Avenues (much of which is now covered by I-35W and other development) comprised another settlement. The settlement concentration subsequently shifted toward north Minneapolis, into areas being vacated by Jews.3 African American families were among the first to settle in the neighborhood that grew south of E. Lake Street along the Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul (CM&StP) rail corridor. Snelling Avenue, with adjacent portions of Minnehaha and Hiawatha Avenues, became one of relatively few areas of early 20th-century Minneapolis where African Americans established a long-term community with a high rate of home ownership. Snelling Avenue, today a small part of the Longfellow neighborhood, developed with tall elevators and mills as its noisy neighborhood backdrop; small factories were also placed between houses at the northern edge of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Living with the Mississippi: the Bohemian Flats
    LIVING WITH THE MISSISSIPPI By Rachel Hines “Living with the Mississippi” is a blog series that examines the history of the river flats communities and what it means to almost literally live on the Mississippi River. Follow along to learn more about life on the Mississippi prior to luxury con- dos and clean river water, before the riverfront was considered a desirable place to live. First published online for River Life at http://riverlife.umn.edu/rivertalk in December, 2014 with comments by Pat Nunnally, River Life. LIVING WITH THE MISSISSIPPI THE BOHEMIAN FLATS by Rachel Hines In 1869, Minneapolis had been a city for only two years, later, in 1941, the Writer’s Project of the Works Progress and the first settlers had just arrived at the Bohemian Administration published a book about the Bohemian Flats Flats- a Danish couple.[1] The community’s population grew which painted a picture of an idyllic, Old World community. to include over 1,000 residents, until it began to dwindle The flats appeared diverse and inclusive, a place for resi- around 1900 due to commercial development at the dents of all ethnic origins to escape the busy life of the city, riverfront. In 1923, many of the residents were evicted from a retreat where traditional customs were maintained. This their homes to make way for a Municipal Barge Terminal, book has fostered an air of nostalgia and romance around and in 1931, most of the remaining community was asked the settlement. to leave as well, leaving only fourteen homes. Just ten years “Boys Rowing Boat Down Street in Bohemian Flats, Minneapolis.” Courtesy of the Minnesota Historical Society, Taken in 1898, Photographer Unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING SERVICES CRITICAL RESPONSE INITIATIVE MAINTAINING FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND PUBLIC SAFETY IN NORTH MINNEAPOLIS An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct Frank Straub | Hassan Aden | Jeffrey Brown | Ben Gorban | Rodney Monroe | Jennifer Zeunik This project was supported by grant number 2015-CK-WX-K005 awarded by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues. The Internet references cited in this publication were valid as of the date of publication. Given that URLs and websites are in constant flux, neither the author(s) nor the COPS Office can vouch for their current validity. Recommended citation: Straub, Frank, Hassan Aden, Jeffrey Brown, Ben Gorban, Rodney Monroe, and Jennifer Zeunik. 2017. Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety in North Minneapolis: An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Published 2017 CONTENTS Letter from the Director . .vi Executive Summary . vii Summary of events vii Implications and challenges vii Public safety response vii Key themes of the review viii Conclusion ix Part I .
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Ii Architectural History Investigation for the Proposed Central Transit Corridor, Hennepin and Ramsey Counties, Minnesota
    PHASE II ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED CENTRAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR, HENNEPIN AND RAMSEY COUNTIES, MINNESOTA Submitted to: Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority Submitted by: The 106 Group Ltd. September 2004 PHASE II ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED CENTRAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR, HENNEPIN AND RAMSEY COUNTIES, MINNESOTA SHPO File No. 96-0059PA The 106 Group Project No. 02-34 Submitted to: Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority 665 Ramsey County Government Center West 50 West Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55102 Submitted by: The 106 Group Ltd. The Dacotah Building 370 Selby Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102 Project Manager: Anne Ketz, M.A., RPA Principal Investigator Betsy H. Bradley, Ph.D. Report Authors Betsy H. Bradley, Ph.D. Jennifer L. Bring, B.A. Andrea Vermeer, M.A., RPA September 2004 Central Transit Corridor Phase II Architectural History Investigation Page i MANAGEMENT SUMMARY From May to August of 2004, The 106 Group Ltd. (The 106 Group) conducted a Phase II architectural history investigation for the Central Transit Corridor (Central Corridor) project in Minneapolis, Hennepin County, and St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The proposed project is a multi-agency undertaking being led by the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority (RCRRA). The Phase II investigation was conducted under contract with the RCRRA. The proposed action is a Light Rail Transit (LRT) or Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) facility for the Central Corridor, a transportation corridor that extends approximately 11 miles between downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul, Minnesota. The project will be receiving federal permitting and funding, along with state funding, and, therefore, must comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and with applicable state laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Download As PDF (Compressed: Smaller File, Lower Quality)
    EXPANDED EDITION (2020) ENOUGH IS ENOUGH A 150-YEAR PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT EXPANDED EDITION SUMMER 2020 CONTENTS The Enough Is Enough Report (originally published in 2017) • Introduction: p.7 • Where We’ve Been: p.8 • Where We’re At: p.18 • Where We’re Going: p.29 • MPD150’s Five Essential Findings: p.37 Expanded Edition Resources • Handouts, zines, and outreach materials: p.38 • Educator toolkit: sample activities and discussion questions: p.54 • Poems, editorials, and other writing: p.58 • Timeline pieces: p.74 “Community Policing and Other Fairy Tales” Comic Book: p.86 An Oral History of the MPD150 Project: p.128 Acknowledgments: p.141 FOREWORD TO THE 2020 EXPANDED EDITION This new, expanded version of the “Enough Is Enough” report was scheduled to be released in spring of 2020. On May 25, 2020, George Floyd was murdered by three Minneapolis police officers as one stood guard. The writing in this report was done primarily between 2016 and 2019, and was first released in 2017. This expanded edition is being released in summer 2020, while the shockwaves from the May uprising are still spreading. We don’t know when you’ll be reading this, but we know that our city will never be the same. As a city, our grief, our rage, our fire, and our frustration are expressions of deep truths. We acknowledge that none of them are new; Black, brown, and Indigenous peoples have carried the oppressive weight of this racist system, and the violence of its police enforcers, since the beginning. We also acknowledge that our connection, our love, our determination, and our solidarity are also our truths, are also necessary, and light our path ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the Lowry Hill Historic
    The Lowry Hill Neighborhood Historic Context Study Prepared for the Lowry Hill Residents Inc. by Landscape Research LLC 2006 The Lowry Hill Neighborhood of Minneapolis Historic Context Study Prepared for Lowry Hill Residents Inc. (LHRI) Minneapolis, MN by Carole S. Zellie Landscape Research LLC 1466 Hythe Street St. Paul, MN 55108 2006 Management Summary The Lowry Hill neighborhood bridges the northern tip of Lake of the Isles across the upland and steep bluff that extends toward the southwestern edge of downtown Minneapolis. Long before electric streetcars connected the area with downtown or the lakeshore was transformed from marshland to parkway, Thomas Lowry envisioned a landscape of large, handsome houses set along wide, tree-lined streets. By 1910 much of this residential landscape was complete, and development continued until about 1930. During this period, the success of E. Lake of the Isles Boulevard improvements and electric streetcar connections along Hennepin and Douglas Avenues invited construction of many high-quality, single-family houses as well as apartment buildings. This historic context study was commissioned by Lowry Hill Residents Inc. (LHRI). Carole S. Zellie of Landscape Research LLC conducted the research and prepared the report. The historic contexts examine the components of neighborhood development that created the architectural and landscape framework of today’s neighborhood. The focus is residential development, especially between ca. 1874 and 1930, with separate sections on apartment building construction and commercial and institutional development. Another chapter provides short biographies of many of the area’s leading architects. The East Isles neighborhood, which shares a similar pattern of development along Lake of the Isles, is the subject of a companion study conducted for the East Isles Residents Association (EIRA).
    [Show full text]
  • From Unrest to Occupation
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College Spring 5-2018 From Unrest to Occupation Cameron J. Ouellette University of Maine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Ouellette, Cameron J., "From Unrest to Occupation" (2018). Honors College. 346. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/346 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM UNREST TO OCCUPATION by Cameron J. Ouellette A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree with Honors (Political Science) The Honors College University of Maine May 2018 Advisory Committee: Amy Fried, Professor and Chair, Department of Political Science, Advisor Mark Brewer, Professor, Department of Political Science and Honors College Robert W. Glover, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science and CLAS Preceptor of Honors James Warhola, Dr. John M. Nickerson Professor, Department of Political Science Steven E. Barkan, Professor and Chair, Department of Sociology © 2018 Cameron Ouellette All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT The repeated occurrences of protest violence during or following Black Lives Matter (BLM) demonstrations has been an issue for the United States since the mass demonstrations of Ferguson, MO in August of 2014. Since then, the United States has experienced a trend of organized demonstrations which follow officer-involved shootings of primarily African American civilians. How and why communities around the nation react to police violence can vary, as do the explanations for the responses of community members, demonstrators, and police officers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Resources Study Has Two Parts
    HISTORIC CONTEXT DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL RESOURCES EVALUATION FOR THE MINNEHAHA-HIAWATHA COMMUNITY WORKS STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK MINNEAPOLIS, HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA Prepared for Hennepin County Community Works Minneapolis, Minnesota by Landscape Research LLC St. Paul, Minnesota 2009 HISTORIC CONTEXT DEVELOPMENT and CULTURAL RESOURCES EVALUATION FOR THE MINNEHAHA-HIAWATHA COMMUNITY WORKS STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK MINNEAPOLIS, HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR Hennepin County Community Works 417 N. 5th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55101 SUBMITTED BY Carole S. Zellie M.A., M.S., Principal Investigator Amy M. Lucas M.S. Landscape Research LLC 1466 Hythe Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 2009 This page intentionally left blank Management Summary In 2007, Hennepin County (HCWT) contracted with Landscape Research LLC to conduct a cultural resources study for the Minnehaha-Hiawatha Corridor in Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Minnesota. This project is a component of the Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Strategic Development Framework. The study area was defined by Hennepin County (Fig.1). It extends from 28th Street at the north to E. Minnehaha Parkway at the south, and includes the first tier of properties along the east side of Minnehaha Avenue. The project area extends across Snelling and Dight (Railroad) Avenues and includes properties along the east side of Hiawatha Avenue. The cultural resources study has two parts. The first provides a land use history for the project area, beginning with the development of the territorial road and rail corridor in the mid-19th century and extending through the 20th-century development of industry and housing. The land use history will provide information for Hennepin County planners and community stakeholders involved in future planning for the Minnehaha-Hiawatha corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Statewide Historic Railroads Study Final MPDF
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) Expires 12-31-2005 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section: Glossary Page 280 Railroads in Minnesota, 1862-1956 Name of Property Minnesota, Statewide County and State Section I. Major Bibliographic References Abbey, Wallace W. 1988 “Soo Line Railroad Company.” In Railroads in the Age of Regulation. Keith L. Bryant, Jr., ed. Bruccoli Clark Layman, Inc., New York. Adams, Judith A. 1991 The American Amusement Park Industry: A History of Technology and Thrills. Twayne Publishers, Boston. Alanen, Alan R. 1989 Years of Change on the Iron Range. In Minnesota in a Century of Change: The State and Its People Since 1900, edited by C. E. Clark, Jr., pp. 155-194. Minnesota Historical Society Press, St. Paul. Anderson, Taimi T. and Dennis A. Gimmestad 1981 National Register of Historic Places Inventory – Nomination Form, Great Northern Railroad Depot. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul. Battistel, David 2006 History of the PAD&W Railway. Available online at: http://members.shaw.ca/padwrr/history. Bee, Roger, Gary F. Browne, and John C. Luecke 1984 The Chicago Great Western in Minnesota. Blue River Publications, Anoka, Minnesota. Berg, Walter G. 1900 Buildings and Structures of American Railroads. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Birk, Douglas A. 1998 Commercial Logging in Minnesota, 1837-1940s. National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul. NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) Expires 12-31-2005 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section: Glossary Page 281 Railroads in Minnesota, 1862-1956 Name of Property Minnesota, Statewide County and State Bloomberg, Britta 1980 Chicago Great Western Depot.
    [Show full text]