WIB 01/06/21 1 Time Code Speaker Dialogue ACT I 01:00:14:10 Title
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Operation Safety Net Update
Operation Safety Net Update April 2, 2021 Operation Safety Net is a coordinated effort to ensure the safety of the public during the trial of Derek Chauvin. The organizations participating in Operation Safety Net are committed to protecting people, property, and freedom of speech. STATUS No identified specific or credible threats reported for Minnesota. Approximately 200 service members from the Minnesota National Guard are deployed in Minneapolis and Saint Paul. As part of Operation Safety Net, the National Guard is helping to ensure the security of critical infrastructure and safeguarding the integrity of the judicial process. OSN SOCIAL MEDIA HIGHLIGHTS We are thankful for Bishop Richard Howell’s leadership and insight as we keep our community safe while allowing people to express their First Amendment rights. We will continue to meet with faith leaders in the Twin Cities as Derek Chauvin’s trial continues. #MNOSN #ChauvinTrial We have been getting questions about the best number to call to report suspicious activity or an emergency. • 911: Life safety emergencies requiring police, fire or EMS. • 612-673-5335: Tips to @MinneapolisPD about suspicious activity not requiring an immediate response. #MNOSN Thousands of people rely on public transportation each day. Their livelihoods depend on it. @MetroTransitMN Police Chief Eddie Frizell asks demonstrators not to block transit platforms. #MNOSN #OperationSafetyNet #ChauvinTrial COMMON QUESTIONS Why this level of security? o Extremist groups may view the trial as an opportunity to do harm. Threats could include individuals with a radicalized ideology intent on disrupting the trial or seizing an opportunity to do harm. This level of security is necessary to ensure the trial can occur and that those who gather are safe. -
Factors Leading to Civil Unrest in the Wake of Police Lethal Use of Force Incidents
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Riverside, California Factors Leading to Civil Unrest in the Wake of Police Lethal Use of Force Incidents: A Tale of Two Cities A Dissertation Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Public Administration George Richard Austin, Jr. Division of Online and Professional Studies Department of Public Administration April 2019 Factors Leading to Civil Unrest in the Wake of Police Lethal Use of Force Incidents: A Tale of Two Cities Copyright © 2019 by George Richard Austin, Jr. ii ABSTRACT Factors Leading to Civil Unrest in the Wake of Police Lethal Use of Force Incidents: A Tale of Two Cities by George Richard Austin, Jr. Since August 9, 2014, the day Officer Darren Wilson shot and killed Michael Brown in the small city of Ferguson, Missouri, large-scale protests after police-involved lethal use of force incidents have become much more prevalent. While there is much academic and public debate on why civil unrest occurs after these unfortunate incidents, there is very little scholarly literature that explores the structure of civil unrest events or literature that attempts to explain why and how peaceful protests turn violent. This dissertation, through exploratory content analysis of extensive after-action reports, provides insight into two instances of civil unrest in the wake of officer-involved lethal use of force incidents: the Minneapolis, Minnesota, civil unrest in the aftermath of the November 15, 2015 shooting of Jamar Clark and the Charlotte, North Carolina, civil unrest in the wake of the September 16, 2016, shooting of Keith Lamont Scott. The study examines the phenomenon of civil unrest from the theoretical frameworks of representative bureaucracy and rational crime theory and utilizes a case study comparison and content analysis research design. -
Maclauchlin, Scott a - DOC
MacLauchlin, Scott A - DOC From: Hautamaki, Sandra J - DOC <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 9:14 AM To: Meisner, Michael F - DOC; Tarr, David R - DOC Subject: RE: SEP 9 work stoppage Indiana Should mailroom be pulling any information that comes in from IWW addressed to inmates? From: Meisner, Michael F - DOC Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 7:42 AM To: Tarr, David R - DOC; Hautamaki, Sandra J - DOC Subject: FW: SEP 9 work stoppage Indiana FYI From: Schwochert, James R - DOC Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 6:59 PM To: DOC DL DAI Wardens CO Dir Subject: FW: SEP 9 work stoppage Indiana FYI From: Jess, Cathy A - DOC Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 3:04 PM To: Schwochert, James R - DOC; Weisgerber, Mark L - DOC Cc: Hove, Stephanie R - DOC; Clements, Marc W - DOC Subject: FW: SEP 9 work stoppage Indiana FYI Indiana information on September 9 possible work stoppage of inmates. From: Basinger, James [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 7:44 PM To: Joseph Tony Stines Subject: SEP 9 work stoppage Indiana Just an FYI on Intel we got today. I would check your systems and databases for Randall Paul Mayhugh, of Terre Haute, IN. Mr. Mayhugh poses as a Union member for a group that call themselves Industrial Workers of the world (IWW). Let know if you find anything. Be safe ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Looks like Leonard McQuay and one of his outside associates are attempting to facilitate involve my in this movement. I know offender McQuay quite well and it doesn't surprise me that we would try to initiate this type of action. -
DECLARATION of BRYAN EDELMAN, Ph.D. I, Bryan Edelman, Solemnly, Sincerely and Truly Declare and Affirm As Follows: I
27-CR-20-12646 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 3/18/2021 5:27 PM DECLARATION OF BRYAN EDELMAN, Ph.D. I, Bryan Edelman, solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm as follows: I. INTRODUCTION I am the co-founder of Trial Innovations, Inc., a national full-service jury research firm. I have worked as a trial consultant for 20 years and have conducted pretrial and post-trial research on both criminal and civil cases across the country. In addition, I have been retained as an expert in over 40 high-profile cases to assess the impact of pretrial publicity on the fairness of the trial proceedings. Counsel for the defendant in State of Minnesota v. Alex Kueng retained me to evaluate the extent and nature of the pretrial publicity covering the death of George Floyd and its potential impact on Mr. Kueng’s due process rights. As part of my analysis, I reviewed relevant newspaper coverage, television publicity, and social media content. It is my opinion that the jury pool in Hennepin County has been saturated with extensive prejudicial news coverage. The pretrial publicity incorporates powerful and emotional language surrounding the death of George Floyd, minute-by-minute accounts of how the tragic incident unfolded, shocking video footage of the encounter, and details from pretrial filings (e.g., autopsy reports). The coverage references prejudicial statements from prominent public figures. For example, the Chief of Police described the incident as “murder.” These types of statements have the capacity to undermine the burden of proof by creating a presumption of guilt within members of the jury pool. -
Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety in North Minneapolis: an After-Action Assessment of the Police Response To
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING SERVICES CRITICAL RESPONSE INITIATIVE MAINTAINING FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND PUBLIC SAFETY IN NORTH MINNEAPOLIS An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct Frank Straub | Hassan Aden | Jeffrey Brown | Ben Gorban | Rodney Monroe | Jennifer Zeunik This project was supported by grant number 2015-CK-WX-K005 awarded by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues. The Internet references cited in this publication were valid as of the date of publication. Given that URLs and websites are in constant flux, neither the author(s) nor the COPS Office can vouch for their current validity. Recommended citation: Straub, Frank, Hassan Aden, Jeffrey Brown, Ben Gorban, Rodney Monroe, and Jennifer Zeunik. 2017. Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety in North Minneapolis: An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Published 2017 CONTENTS Letter from the Director . .vi Executive Summary . vii Summary of events vii Implications and challenges vii Public safety response vii Key themes of the review viii Conclusion ix Part I . -
MPD150 Report
a 150 year performance review of the minneapolis police department mpd150 TOTHOSE WHO'VE LEDTHE WAY The initiative that we have named MPD150 stands on the shoulders of the activists and organizers, community organizations and street protesters, whistleblowers, families of loved ones lost to police violence and the numerous others who have led the fight for truly safe communities in the past and still today. Their contributions over the years have made this undertaking possible. For this we honor them. MPD150 is an independent association of organizers, activists, researchers, and artists that came together in the spring of 2016 in anticipation of the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD)'s 150th anniversary. We are not the project of any organization, although we recognize the contributions many of them have made over the years. Some of them have shared leads and material for this report. Enough is Enough is one component of a multi faceted effort that includes public art, educational activities, political action, cultural activism, and more. We hope to inspire and support new community initiatives that contribute to a shared vision of a police-free future. TABLEOF CONTENTS 1: Intro ......................................... 3 2: Where We've Been .................... 4 3: Where We're At ........................ 14 4: Where We're Going .................. 25 5: Findings ................................... 33 6: Credits ..................................... 35 M PD 150 Enough is Enough! Enough is Enough! That is both the The US police system, we contend, is not outlines of the police-free communities conclusion and the title of this report, reformable. Efforts to reform it - aimed of the future. We have no shortage of a 150-year performance review of at addressing recruitment, training, ancient cultural traditions, innovative the Minneapolis Police Department discipline, oversight and transparency social programs, and community (MPD). -
United States District Court District of Minnesota
CASE 0:20-cv-01645 Document 1 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Nekima Levy Armstrong, Marques Armstrong, Terry Hempfling, and Rachel Clark, On behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. ______________ City of Minneapolis, Minneapolis Chief of Police JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Medaria Arradondo in his individual and official capacity; Minneapolis Police Lieutenant Robert Kroll, in his individual and official capacity; COMPLAINT Minnesota Department of Public Safety Commissioner John Harrington, in his individual and official capacity; Minnesota State Patrol Colonel Matthew Langer, in his individual and official capacity; and John Does 1-2, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. For their Complaint, Plaintiffs state and allege as follows: INTRODUCTION The right to assemble is fundamental, as is the right to speak out against injustice. These rights are enshrined in our Constitution. Ideas and movements that changed the course of our history came to the forefront of the American consciousness through assembly and protest. Law enforcement too often has been on the wrong side of history, attempting to suppress the right of the people to assemble. This freedom cannot be suppressed and it must be protected at all costs. Minnesota is no exception. Historically, law enforcement in Minneapolis specifically, and Minnesota more generally, have attempted to suppress the right of its citizens to assemble peacefully. Recently, they have been and are actively suppressing this right by exercising CASE 0:20-cv-01645 Document 1 Filed 07/28/20 Page 2 of 32 unnecessary and excessive force against protesters who gathered to express their outrage at the murder of George Floyd at the hands of the Minneapolis Police Department. -
MAIBA Statement Re George Floyd
Minnesota American Indian Bar Association P.O. Box 3712, Minneapolis, MN 55403 www.maiba.org May 29, 2020 FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The Minnesota American Indian Bar Association ("MAIBA") condemns the actions of Minneapolis Police Department Officers Derek Chauvin, Thomas Lane, Tou Thao, and J. Alexander Kueng that led to the murder of George Floyd and calls for action to be taken against all of the officers by the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office. Sadly, George Floyd’s family and the world have repeatedly witnessed the death of Mr. Floyd which was captured on multiple video recordings. After Mr. Floyd was restrained and handcuffed, Derek Chauvin kneeled on Mr. Floyd’s neck with his full weight. Mr. Floyd begged him to stop and struggled for air as he mustered out the words, “I can’t breathe!” over and over again. After his body was limp and he could not possibly pose a threat to any person, Chauvin continued to kneel with his full weight on Mr. Floyd’s neck for several more minutes which led to his death. The other three officers stood by while Chauvin mercilessly ended the life of George Floyd. Police officers are not above the law. Although the officers involved were rightfully terminated, they should have been immediately arrested for their egregious and homicidal actions. Decades upon decades of systematic racism, violence, and unanswered pleas for justice have led to our citizens to take action. The City of Minneapolis and surrounding communities are smoldering literally with fire and metaphorically with the frustration and pain of the community that knows no person could kill a man by kneeling on his neck and walk away free, unless that person happens to be a Minneapolis Police Officer. -
Civil Rights and Policing Practices in Minnesota
Civil Rights and Policing Practices in Minnesota A Report of the Minnesota Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights March 2018 Advisory Committees to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights By law, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has established an advisory committee in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The committees are composed of state citizens who serve without compensation. The committees advise the Commission of civil rights issues in their states that are within the Commission’s jurisdiction. More specifically, they are authorized to advise the Commission in writing of any knowledge or information they have of any alleged deprivation of voting rights and alleged discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, national origin, or in the administration of justice; advise the Commission on matters of their state’s concern in the preparation of Commission reports to the President and the Congress; receive reports, suggestions, and recommendations from individuals, public officials, and representatives of public and private organizations to committee inquiries; forward advice and recommendations to the Commission, as requested; and observe any open hearing or conference conducted by the Commission in their states. Letter of Transmittal Minnesota Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights The Minnesota Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights submits this report detailing civil rights concerns associated with police practices in Minnesota. The Committee submits this report as part of its responsibility to study and report on civil rights issues in the state of Minnesota. The contents of this report are primarily based on testimony the Committee heard during hearings on March 21, 2017 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. -
Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING SERVICES CRITICAL RESPONSE INITIATIVE MAINTAINING FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND PUBLIC SAFETY IN NORTH MINNEAPOLIS An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct Frank Straub | Hassan Aden | Jeffrey Brown | Ben Gorban | Rodney Monroe | Jennifer Zeunik This project was supported by grant number 2015-CK-WX-K005 awarded by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific agencies, companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement by the author(s) or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues. The Internet references cited in this publication were valid as of the date of publication. Given that URLs and websites are in constant flux, neither the author(s) nor the COPS Office can vouch for their current validity. Recommended citation: Straub, Frank, Hassan Aden, Jeffrey Brown, Ben Gorban, Rodney Monroe, and Jennifer Zeunik. 2017. Maintaining First Amendment Rights and Public Safety in North Minneapolis: An After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to Protests, Demonstrations, and Occupation of the Minneapolis Police Department’s Fourth Precinct. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Published 2017 CONTENTS Letter from the Director . .vi Executive Summary . vii Summary of events vii Implications and challenges vii Public safety response vii Key themes of the review viii Conclusion ix Part I . -
Volume 14 ______2008
Legal Writing The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute VOLUME 14 _____________________________________________ 2008 In Memoriam ........................................................................ viii Introduction An Introduction to Applied Storytelling and to This Symposium ....................... Ruth Anne Robbins 3 Articles Applied Legal Storytelling, Politics, and Factual Realism ............................................. Brian J. Foley 17 Storytelling, Narrative Rationality, and Legal Persuasion ............................. J. Christopher Rideout 53 Lawyer as Artist: Using Significant Moments and Obtuse Objects to Enhance Advocacy ................................ James Parry Eyster 87 The Plot Thickens: The Appellate Brief as Story ................................................. Kenneth D. Chestek 127 The Case for “Thinking Like a Filmmaker”: Using Lars von Trier’s Dogville as a Model for Writing a Statement of Facts .................... Elyse Pepper 171 Justice Formation from Generation to Generation: Atticus Finch and the Stories Lawyers Tell Their Children ............................................. Mary Ellen Maatman 207 iv Putting the “I” in Wr*t*ng: Drafting an A/Effective Personal Statement to Tell a Winning Refuge Story .......................... Stacy Caplow 249 Better Revision: Encouraging Student Writers to See through the Eyes of the Reader ......................................... Patricia Grande Montana 291 v In Memoriam Sincerest condolences are extended to the families and friends of colleagues who -
O U R C O M M U N I T I E S , O U R S O L U T I O N S
O U R C O M M U N I T I E S , O U R S O L U T I O N S : A n O r g a n i z e r ’ s T o o l k i t f o r D e v e l o p i n g C a m p a i g n s t o A b o l i s h P o l i c i n g B y C r i t i c a l R e s i s t a n c e c r i t i c a l r e s i s t a n c e . o r g O c t o b e r 2 0 2 0 1 Abolish Policing Toolkit: Table of Contents 1. Introduction – pg 3 2. Talking About Policing & Abolition – pg 5 ○ Definition of Policing and Definition of Abolition - 6 ○ More Key Words & Generating Shared Language - 7 ○ Anti-Policing Talking Points - 15 3. Organizing & Strategy Tools – pg 18 ○ Reform vs Abolition Chart - 19 ○ Bold Demands - 20 ○ Campaign Assessment Tool & Example Campaigns - 24 4. Political Education & Resources – pg 47 ○ Policing 101 Workshop Overview & Synopsis - 48 ○ Reading & Resources List - 49 5. Anti-Policing Statements – pg 50 ○ Policing Statement - 51 ○ Drop the Charges Statement - 52 ○ No New SF Jail’s Stop Criminalizing Our Communities Statement - 53 6. Feedback Survey & Acknowledgments – pg 55 2 1. Introduction: Fighting for a World Free from Policing Months into the COVID pandemic of 2020, uprisings set off around the world uplifting a range of calls to remedy state violence and racial capitalism.