Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Memorializing the Holocaust

Memorializing the Holocaust

.

.

­

V

. by I

.

a

of

B

the de­

de­

the not

and

sys

by

our

reso­

mak­

MalaYSia is

many

is

license

Publishers

Publishers refuge.

always

(1995;

tn

Lipsadt concep­

this

of

memory memory memory suggests

instance,

so.

borders basiC

disturbing

resolution

As

Amsterdam under

of

not

find

serve

be

understand­

disallow

Science conscience.

for

Printed threatens

seeking Impulses

the is fulfill to form, for

(Overseas Memory

our questions

consequences

or modern

it

Langer

at

disruptive sites our to

and

in

itself.

memory-burden undergirded

OPA

on

Breach

should

traditional

Holocaust: such social

so

is

Association)

Netherlands

connecting

lies the

Memory-work desire

and

to 1996

our

this

disturbing. seek

giving

impulse difficult It

is.

@ The

political

activate

Impact

monuments

of

of the Holocaust

In

why

community.

the civilization

question

the

Lawrence ruptures

Public about communities

Gordon

of

A us

Holocaust

of and

explodes

That

they

the

is

way society,

strong

examine approach

It

While

into

some

a

. and it

a

the Idea

Published

Nevertheless,

acts.

These

profoundly

diffuse

as

.

social from

and conscience. question

the

For relieve

which

undiminished

calls communities

memory-work.

be

world

Holocaust. exists

It

in

Its

salvation.

workers

to

in

443

erasing

and

mocks simply catharsis.

revisionist often

social

the

that

refuge

forgetting,

List

StudIes individuals Without by

to

memorial

unsettling there

ways even contemporary

in

stili conscious

Holocaust

today

and

in

senses. they

in

engage and

and creatures.

.

cultural

the

that

unimaginable.

publisher the and

of

Cultural

many

only never

creating to

interrogation.

I even

self

denial,

to

the

itself

particular

Admitting of

the that

individuals

Memorializing

left

Holocaust are ideological

holocaust

the

ourselves

and to

spiritual license

from

unsettled

morality. continues

been

the this and

to

Pedagogy by

as for

and

consider

matter

functions.

the

the security.

have

and

which

Holocaust,

old.

lines

has

directly by

remembering 443-457

and

diverse. anti-Semitism .

manifests

that

Langer fundamental

open

by monument

Schindler's the

pp

desire imperative

permitted SOCial responsibility events,

. a reflection EducatfDnl

world

ourselves

Ott

4

for

of

Holocaust

. qf is

humanity.

century

wide thought

of

comfort.

avallabte

about

raised closing illustrates,

the most

a

No

the it or

our of

of

manageable,

though

the

erect means approach

comfort

unspeakable

social

18. of

reuleW it

the

the

Half -Lawrence leaves sense

p.184)

But

ongOing

the

Photocopying Reprints Vol. Brian

that In ing in tions the tems memory lution. One sire. issues The (1993) deep-seeded racist and serve may to ing important merely our construction

Thus,

,

:J a a is

in

the

be

445 old

the feel on

the lose

film

how

turn

and

with

film. level. ope­

nar­ of

forget shoot such seem docu­

other using dolly­

audi­

result

black­

as hand"

Holly­

lesser itself possi­

colored the

usually

to sites

to sustain may

Is

In credence

on

explains,

had making would

and the

the

my

objectivity

every

during

Sight shot

and it

documents

film are

us filmed

involves

such in of

explore action shooting

worlds

distinction at

several

used another

rely

film

is

I casting

dramatic gives film,

his

that Schindler

we're

that

historical

further

By were

whom

reality the Holocaust

black-and-white. on in whenever

losing

selectively 3 hold

the

This

List

took wants

film To

present in spectators Spielberg

films .

give

this than Schindler

List

and

recognized

monochromatic film,

employs

historical the But

goal

ever because Auschwitz-Birkenau. materials

List, fantastic to

of

Oskar

a

As medium

a itself.

archaeological actors the could

section,

perception

spatial

I documents several

film At

making

Is as

viewing

reality that of

and

List

fell.

the factory Impression entirely widely the

footage

and of

of

this

Spielberg

aware

Spielberg and

contrary, camp

List Schindler's without printed

Spielberg's

monochromatic

making

the Spielberg

spectator.

Schindler's director's

In

experienced.

and

principle

camera

of

the all, extent

between

techniques Schindler's

In

the

filmmaking. effect a contemporary actual

Fiennes real

dramatic almost not

fictional

creates occupied. the

Historical death

Though keenly language

The

the

elaborate On other

the

ending,

Memorlaltzlng a

unedited

film.

Park actresses

the

Schindler'S

is so with

with

experience the

duel history

shot

To Above

most the

once filmed of

documentary percent

scenes

and

Ralph

"we're document,

past. technique

live, of is

of Schindler's

conventions,

primary

Is

it.

appears

encourages

was film

the

used between

he

75).

30 instance

reality, the the

it

positions . creating

intersection

the

like

and

film they

p selected two While recognize.

he

cast, gate

Jurassic that

document. of

beginning,

happened. and in

dramatic

sense

line documentary has

this

of

combined Color an reporting

second

a

in

that the

a

audience's

the Spielberg

the in

subvert

Nearly

more uses fact

technical to the

contracts,

skiJI

1993; .

evoking Spielberg events many

with to

This

because

The

CNN to

Neeson the

how are

When

apartment use quality

more. "really"

Are,

Krak6w,

First. carefully forged

towering

understanding

cameras. The

Island

the

historical

looks constructed

and

p.75)

film these

blurs its

In

he

language

that a the

to

immediately

more

a

a monochromatic

ever the letters,

Lost Liam

our

watching to

Spielberg

technical is

in that

do

List

or

the (Schickel, to not

cameras.

remarked attempts consider

the

narrative. 1993;

cameras. contributed

document. it even

associated

to

are

equipment, historical

exceptions

his Spielberg

Since

ensure

of

something under

he a

reading

actors

location. hand-held imaginary

and

we that own it immediate to

and for

that

addition to credibility

would

only

documentary.

of

perception,

product on

the Formally, a shot

, its

does

In a

wanted

happening themselves important fact that Spielberg ment Schindler's of frames. documentaries, it The generally and-white photographs, black-and-white. gives historical filming lend document" to use mounted hand-held more

"I hand-held (Schickel, is akin steps :o.s wood rated he location, this Raiders ble rative known ence

is is

to to

an

in­

the the are not

and it film this and and

diffi­

com­

them as

many offers sanc­

It

much

not

power cultu­

List nearly for of expec­

critic's monu­

Ameri­

action"

"really"

Oscars, witness

the

is

is

explains industry

the

films

its in

the its and

elements,

way

social

watershed self-reflec­

that

the us

believe

are

of

agency

of

By a to a

I

setting

generate

these

that

. .

with spaces social seven

the

witnessing entertainment Commercially, There

suggesting

as

forms,

by memorial

movements

seductive

light formal

argument

between

turn

everyone's

Schindler'S such

are conservative reaching films result

art making

and life

how

List. In

contend its

the the

human

struggle,

time resolution

a

the reality,

in we

sense.

describes I

of far by

whether

observing we

of

struggle

company

photographs,

of

As for

as capturing productive nearly heralded other While

to

which

have

are

Holocaust

considering same

part that

a

self-reflective political concrete In

model to us

(1993)

internal and

is asking

by from analyzing we been

message?

relationship

a deSire

Unlike

the being

Schindler's

Ideologically identifying

simplistic narrative

for advancing

or

structured director.

By

way

as

have

at

success,

fashionably, has

This the an

exceeded our

feeling

In

production

masterpiece,

impression

is the

now

any film,

Young essay

Holocaust.

appear

up

whether or

events

cinema

best

is

inspires

disallows

in

basis

it merely the

film is

the

borne, and eyes.

the prompting into

fuels while

film

the

a

or

central

DOCUMENT objects

1994

greater

provocative, and

is

List

and us

movement.

educational

film

us

artistic project.

describe our

hold

as agents

than List

the

Holocaust

issue

a

than

The

that

create

to the

million

even

give or

constructing

and

accurately

the director draw

conscience.

4).

The

conclude

elements itself

actions picture

an

by memory-burden. before serious

such

memory structurally I

$22

through

distinguishes films

its

(p.

a

judge

Rather

seeks Spielberg's

of

"(rlather important,

and

Schindler's "films

is

They

surrounding actors

the

HISTORICAL our Reviewers of

was to

but

is

Schindler's history

Holocaust,

that these

fulfiJIs

impression unfold

aesthetic AS

memory-burden While

public

that

that

film shortcomings. essay

film,

convey dramatic suggests

the that Steven wish

Ott

how

writes,

those

past

reality memorialize the

budgeted an

is

spectator.

then create to our

acclaim,

spectacle"

of as

retain memory

the

pictures. FILM to On

of

he shoulder art

not this

memory-work.

it

film

best

to

which

the

to

Hollywood. implications even

community,

of

do

believe

real

Brian

used

from create reflect

seemingly

I memory-work. on

narrative. the

this for in principal

effort (1974),

when

fails on

issues

public to 12-13).

characteristic

be we culture

modestly which

scope,

motion.

the

No

"motion"

demonstrate

refuge tion ments the tations, ternal political about task forms including fort essay, to 444 process can unanimous tuary ways standards, ral I possible events (pp. can undoubtedly only film's almost in say event cult completely One perception able of and Metz

DRAMATIC 446 Brtan Ott Memortaltztng the Holocaust 447

Amon Goeth was to make the audience forget that they were actors at all. This characteristic does not necessarily predispose spectators to think of With regard to , Spielberg explained, "I was looking for the the film as a document, but It does subvert the film's fictional nature. A second actual guy, as close to the actual man as I could find. Liam did a spectacu­ and even more pervasive feature In press reviews of the film Is Its Identifi­ lar test for me, and I like the fact that although he's not an unknown actor, cation with Thomas Keneally's 1982 nonfiction account of Oskar Schindler's he's not a star either" (Richardson, 1994; 70). In the conclusion of the film, life. In reporting that the film was "based upon" the "nonfiction" work by Spielberg momentarily drops the illusion he has created by having the sur­ Keneally, reviews reinforced the Idea that the film testifies to the past, that viving &hindlerjud.en (Schindler Jews) appear on screen with the actresses It documents historical events. The film's frequent association with the award and actors who portrayed them. But the appearance of the Schindlerjuden winning book further legitimates the (h1)story presented by the film. In the film functions to legitimate its historical authenticity . Even as It Thus far, I have argued that both the press reviews of &htndler's List reveals the illusion, it lends credence and authority to the narrative. As the and the director's formal and stylistic choices function to Implode the tra­ Schindlerjuden and their descendants pass by Schindler's tomb, they place ditional borders between dramatic film and historical document. I turn stones on his grave site. In this powerful tribute to Schindler, past and now to how this break down pOSitions the spectator In relation to the present are joined and a sense of historical unity emerges. Thus , the mo­ narrative. In most films, the viewer's recognition that she Is observing a ment Is not nearly as disruptive to the film's illusion as It may first appear. constructed reality creates a psychic space where she can comfortably There is one final stylistic matter that Significantly reaffirms the specta­ retreat In response to feelings evoked by the film. Anyone who has ever tor's feeling that she is experiencing history. Spielberg (re)creates a number watched a horror film and attempted to calm himself by thinking "this Isn't of dehumanizing experiences on film. In one scene, prisoners at Plasz6w real" has relied on the space I am describing. But &hindler's LIst elimi­ run naked in circles before camp doctors who are looking to separate the nates this space. In creating the perception that It is a historical document, healthy from the sick. The audience's privileged knowledge that the healthy the film does not allow one to think "this Isn't real." The effect Is actually will remain at the camp as forced laborers while the sick are sent to their the opposite. The stronger the emotion evoked, the more "real" the narra­ deaths makes the scene all the more chilling. In another, equally disturb ·· tive seems. As a result, the viewer must resolve emotion within the Ing sequence near the film's end, the women who were mistakenly sent 11) narrative of the film Itself. In other words, to the extent that &hindler's LIst Auschwitz-Blrkenau are herded shivering, naked, their heads shaved into creates feelings of anomie, fear, or discomfort, spectators can only find showers. Suddenly, the showers turn dark and the women cryout. In this resolution and comfort within the narrative. The remainder of this essay Instance, the audience's lack of privileged knowledge-not knowing whether describes how the film evokes particular emotions and then resolves them. the showers will release water or lethal gas-Invites viewers to Identify with the women's horror. Like the women, viewers, are momentarily suspended GOETH AND SCHINDLER: FROM ANOMIE TO ORDER In fear. As Spielberg recognizes, these scenes do not merely represen'. de­ humanizing experiences, they (re)create them. Reflecting on his direction, The Holocaust story told in Schindler's List is crafted around the lives of tts Spielberg states, "the worst days came any time I had to have people take protagonist, Oskar Schindler, and antagonist, Amon Goeth. This fact is ',lot their clothes off and be humiliated and reduce themselves down to live­ without its own political Implications. Of all the possible perspectives f;om stock" (Schlckel, 1993; p. 76). In capturing dehumanizing experiences on which a narrative could be constructed around the Holocaust, the first film, Spielberg collapses the psychic space between drama and historical major Hollywood effort focused not on the lives of Holocaust victims, but reality making It nearly Impossible for the viewer to conceive of the Images on a reluctant hero who overcomes overwhelming odds by outsmarting a as somehow less than real. ruthless, Inhumane enemy. This formula Is familiar not only to most The transformation from dramatic film to historical document that I have Americans, but in light of Jaws, Raiders of the Lost Arc, and Jurassic Park been describing Is not limited to the viewing experience of Schindler's List, apparently to Spielberg as well. In Schindler's List, Spielberg uses this however. Individuals also experience films outside of theaters. Two formula to generate Intense feelings of anomie which he later alleviates examples are conversations with friends and press reviews. I would like to by re-establishing order. At first. the Nazis and more specifically Amon Goeth focus briefly on the latter Since It often Influences the former. Due, at least disrupt our faith In the human spirit, but shortly a morally driven Oskar In part, to the film's subject matter, it received substantial press coverage Schindler emerges to reaffirm our belief in humanity. In short, what the prior to its screen debut. Though numerous and varied, reviews of the film film does Is create moral chaos which It· then resolves. It Is a process which are characterized by two features. The first feature Is the repeated use of evokes strong emotions from beginning to end. But what the film falls to do the word "historical" as a deSCriptor of the film.' To describe a narrative as Is prompt us to reflect on the causes and effects of the moral chaos, to "historical" Is to give It temporal authenticity. Its consistent use In the internalize the memory, to connect It to social conscience, or to judge the press to describe &hindler's LIst, authOrizes the film's account of past events. usefulness or value of the previous order. 448 Brian Ott Memorializing the Holocaust 449 From the moment we are introduced to Oskar Schindler, we are irresis­ Schindler's charm, Stern provides the strong moral force at this point in tibly drawn toward him. Though we do not know him, we are captivated by the film. As likable and charismatic as Schindler is, the audience knows he his charm, his presence. Spielberg's editing of the scene in which we meet is a hedonist and womanizer, a Nazi sympathizer and war profiteer. Yet, the Schindler ensures that this is the case. As Schindler is escorted and seated viewer is assured in subtle ways that this will all change and his true at a table in a fine Krak6w restaurant, the camera surveys the room from character will emerge. his point of view. The joining of our (the camera's) gaze with Schindler's In one scene, Oskar, while dining with his wife, tells her that, "They begins a process of identification that will continue throughout the film. won't soon forget the name Schindler here. I can tell you that. 'Oskar Maintaining Schindler's point of view, the camera flirts briefly with a woman Schindler,' they'll say. Everybody remembers him. He did something ex­ seated across the room before it comes to rest on the "reserved" sign traordinary. He did something no one else did." Though Schindler is refer­ at an empty table. The camera's lingering gaze on the sign signals ring to the money he will make off of his enamelware factory, the words Schindler's interest in it, while at the same time creating our interest by foreshadow the extraordinary thing that he really will do and be remem­ prompting us to wonder about its significance. A woman in an elegant bered for in the future. A short time later, Schindler expresses disgust to evening gown enters with two Nazi officers and they are seated at another an SS official over the summary execution of one of his workers by Nazi table. Schindler sends the trio a bottle of wine and we sense that the game brutes. Regardless of Schindler's claim that he is angry because lOSing an is afoot. At first. one Nazi joins Schindler at his table, then another, then essential worker costs him money, the audience knows that the real rea­ the woman, and soon everyone in the restaurant is gathered around him, son goes deeper. Previously in the narrative, this worker had come to laughing, singing, and drinking. By the time the Nazi commander arrives Schindler and thanked him profusely for his graciousness. Schindler's dis­ and is seated at his "reserved" table, Oskar Schindler has been transformed comfort as the man praised his goodness signaled to the audience Schindler's from an unknown small-time businessman Into the most prominent figure coming moral awakening. Another signal to the audience was the way in the room. When the commander asks the maitre d' who that man is, he Schindler justified his anger. Since the man was old and disabled, Schindler's replies, "why that's Oskar Schindler," in a tone of voice that suggests argument that he was "highly skilled" was Insufficient to account for his Schindler is the most important figure in all of Poland. Never mind that the emotion. Hence, as the narrative continues to develop, Schindler's indiffer­ name Oskar Schindler meant nothing to the maitre d' an hour earlier. ence toward the treatment of the Jews and his outward projection of ambi­ Spielberg's synoptic editing of Schindler's swash-buckling machinations tion and greed appear to be nothing more than a cover for his compassion­ makes him all the more dynamic and alluring. In a series of quick shots, ate efforts to help as many Jews as he can. It is at this point that the we observe Schindler being photographed with Nazi officers, night club audience is introduced to Untersturmfiihrer Amon Goeth and faith in the dancers, and finally the Nazi commander. As the frames whisk by on the moral order is seriously disrupted. screen, the audience is whisked with them. Positio.ned in the center of Throughout the film, the Nazi commandant, Amon Goeth, Is portrayed every frame and shot from low-angles, Schindler commands our attention as the epitome of evil. In the viewer's first experience with the comman­ and our reverence. The people in the restaurant cannot get enough of Oskar dant, he is surveying the Jewish ghetto from the back seat of a Mercedes Schindler and neither can those in the theater. Both audiences delight in convertible. Goeth is touring the ghetto because he has been ordered to his presence. liqUidate it and relocate the Jews to the Plasz6w forced labor camp now The year is 1941 and the Jews in Nazi-controlled Krak6w are forced, under construction. His cold nature is established Immediately when the after being dispossessed of their businesses, to relocate to a small, run­ Nazi officer In the front seat asks Goeth, "Do you have any questions, Sir?" down part of the city known as the ghetto. It is in this context, the audience and he replies annoyed, "Ya, why Is top down? I'm fucking freezing." His learns, that Oskar Schindler conceives of and begins to execute his plan to statement is disturbingly ironic given that the ghetto streets are filled with get rich quick. After obtaining money from two Jewish elders, Schindler hundreds of Jews huddled around fires in a lOSing attempt to stay warm. purchases a deserted enamelware factory with plans to manufacture pots The viewer's initial revulSion to Goeth is further inscribed in the next scene. and pans for the Nazi war machine. He then hires Itzhak Stern (Ben Goeth has returned to Plasz6w and he is In the process of selecting a Je­ Kingsley), a member of the localjudenrat (Jewish council), to serve as his wish woman to be his housekeeper. As near as the viewer can tell, he se­ accountant and plant manager. Since Jewish labor is cheap-what little lects Helen Hirsh (Embeth Davidtz) because she is the most frightened of they earn is paid directly to the SS-Schindler decides to build his labor him. It Is becoming apparent to the viewer that Goeth revels in creating force from ghetto Jews. Recognizing that employees who are classified as fear. In fact, his very next action Is to order the death of the camp's foreman "essential workers" are protected from "resettlement" to concentration of construction, a JeWish woman with an engineering degree. After the camps, Stern seizes the opportunity to save Jewish lives by adding chil­ woman advises Goeth that one ofthe building's foundations should be torn dren and other unskilled individuals to the factory rolls. Thus, despite down and rebuilt, he has her shot in the head in front of the other workers. 450 Brtan Ott Memortaltztng the Holocaust 451 That he then takes the woman's adVice attests to his psychotic nature. In the long scene (night) finally ends, the moral chaos remains. In the next both of these events, Goeth's action Is utterly unpredictable. It Is through scene, Goeth, lounging shirtless on the balcony of his villa at Plaszow, this unpredictable brutality that Spielberg Is so easily able to evoke feel­ entertains himself by randomly shooting prisoners. Again, Spielberg has Ings of anomie In the audience. The whimsical and random brutality of created the expectation of order and withheld It. By now, the viewer Is Goeth defies any attempt by the spectator to make rational sense of his completely disoriented and distraught. actions. The moral order Is exploded. Never knowing how Goeth will act, But Spielberg's world cannot tolerate such moral chaos forever. Eventu­ viewers are completely at his mercy. Goeth's actions become a trope for the ally, the moral order must be restored. As we have seen, Spielberg builds Holocaust; unexplainable and unthinkable, they are profoundly disorient­ the Intense desire for the re-establishment of the moral order and the Ing. This Is why the experience of watching Schindler's List, at times, leaves comfort It provides Into the narrative of the film. Thus, the viewer wildly the viewer feeling numb. desires resolution. It Is precisely at this moment of utter chaos-when the At this point In the narrative, Viewers witness the turbulent, almost un ­ audience most needs Its moral hero to emerge, to come riding in on his bearably vivid liquidation of the ghetto. At fifteen minutes, It Is an extraor­ horse and save the day-that Schindler, riding a horse no less, has his dinarily long scene, one which both Intensifies our feelings of anomie and moral awakening. The liquidation scene Is Intercut with shots of Schindler fuels our desire for order. The scene begins with Goeth's speech to the SS riding to a hilltop that overlooks the city and watching the mass human troops. In preparation for the liquidation, he tells them, destruction . Schindler's gaze ultimately falls upon a small girl In a red Today Is history. Today will be remembered. Years from now, the young will ask with coat. Against the monochromatic film, the coat Is eerily vivid. Schindler wonder about this day. Today Is history and you are part of It. Six hundred years ago . ... follows the child through the chaos of Krak6w, action erupting all around the Jews (were told) they could come to Krak6w. They came. They carried their belong­ her. From the look on his face the audience knows that he Is deeply moved. Ings Into the city, they settled, they took hold. they prospered In business , science, The little glr-lln the red coat has personalized the war for Schindler In a way education. the arts. They came here with nothing. nothing, and they flourished. For six that will no longer allow him to Ignore the Nazi atrocities. The remainder centuries there has been a Jewish Krak6w. Think about that. By this evening those six of fUm to moral order, centuries are a rumor. They never happened. Today Is history. the tracks Schindler's struggle restore the to undermine NaZI efforts, to create a safe haven for Jews and In the pro­ Goeth's speech Is, for the viewer, one of the most disturbing moments In cess for the audience. The stage has been set for a showdown between good Schindler's LIst. It Is disturbing not because the moment Is reflective, how­ and evil. ever. The audience Is not prompted to think about the Implications of the Mter the liquidation of the ghetto on March 13, 1943, Schindler Immedi­ holocaust or to connect It to social conscience. Rather, the viewer Is drawn ately begins to engage In acts of reSistance. His first move Is to forge a Into the (hl)story. The hideousness of the Nazi acts become overwhelmingly social relationship with Goeth. I describe this as a move because, though Immediate and undeniable. The result Is feelings of emotional and moral their relationship Is complex, the film creates the Impression that Schindler chaos, feelings which become even more Intense as the audience Is sud­ Is manipulating Goeth. In fact, It Is only a short time before Schindler, denly barraged with rapid shots of Nazis running through ghetto streets, using both his charm and money, convinces Goeth to allow him to operate clearing out buildings,. trashing suitcases, and brutally murdering fright­ his own sub-camp from the enamelware factory. Once he Is back In bUSI­ ened Jews . The action Is violent and chaotic. Terrified Jews scramble for ness , Schindler begins bringing those workers who are In the most danger hiding places, ducking under beds, crawling Into furniture, and jumping at Plasz6w over to his sub -camp. He does this by bribing the Plasz6w SS Into holes. Like them, the Viewer desperately wants to find a safe place with valuable personal possessions such as his lighter, Cigarette case, and away from this disorder. But the camera does not allow It. In shot after watch. 'But Schindler's resistance Is not limited to the haven he creates shot, Viewers are swept along with the confUSion. As Krak6w grows dark, from Goeth's monstrous treatment of prisoners. Mter a party at Goeth's the action begins to slow down and the Viewer believes that the scene Is Villa, for Instance, Schindler attempts to alter the commandant's sadistic coming to an end. But the Nazis are only waiting for those In hiding to behaVior by appealing to his deSire for power. He tells him, come out. There Is a creak In the floor, then the deep sound of a plano, and It all begins again. Nazis trample through tenements, blasts from machine They fear us because we have the power to kill arbitrarily. A man commits a crime. he guns light up rooms, blood sprays walls and pavement. When the next should know better. We have him killed and we feel pretty good about It . Or we kill him break In the commotion comes, Goeth Is splashing water on his face. He ourselves, we feel even better. That's not power though, that's justice. That's different than power. Power Is when we have every justification to kill and we don't. That's what mutters, "I wish this fucking night were over,' and so too do we. But the the Emperor said. A man stole something. he's brought In before the Emperor. he throws scene does not end there, and neither does "this night.· By repeatedly lead­ himself down on the ground, he begs for mercy. he knows he's going to die. And the Ing us to believe that the chaos Is over and then extending It, Spielberg Emperor pardons him. This worthless man. he let's him go. That's power. Amon. That Is Increases our desire for the restoration of moral order. To our dismay, when power. .

to

at

is

no

be

of

the his

453

be

has the

will

tur­

his

the

been hus­ The It. and

been

indi­

been

story does

to his

does

Allied moral arrive,

haven before,

women

a

do

guards

evoked

return

must

best forced a

suggest

has

to Schindler

one from the

has the

spirit their

closure across

defeat

Schindler,

not the

men

not

to emotionally

profiteer

and safely

to

of

Nazi Inscription,

Schindler If factory. to actions,

comfort can

to

and

is

only time

Schindler

Brlnnlltz,

act. shattered.

there

emotional

the

celebration,

Judaism world

the It

like is

order

and the

mistakenly

races leave his

the Thus, knowledge when received

Holocaust

the

emotions

bribery, It

human

rush

no

such this

and the of arrives,

pOint, be

Oskar on

he leave

forces

has narrative

actions Mter shipped

and

has

much this

Is numb.

could the

While

party but

the to

he and not he

of

would moral surrender

out remains Talmudic

is

so So, offer

began. this occurs

strong

I once

that

you humiliated and would

But

do begin,

Based lies Allied

Christianity,

too Nazi

the by delivers

that Or ttme

heroic

trains. the There which admonishes, that

community.

women

savior. Now

spirit of

workers

he notion could error.

the

occur over. train

they the

a

silently also-through

the

has

must the

prepares

more

a sign

Is

the

his

of audience),

narrative

the surprise as

lens them.

that

file camp.

he By

about entire."

resolve

only

teachings,

on bearing

to

.

experienced

have

separate

human to the Memorializing no

Spielberg

first

unconditional

or

the

As

opportunity.

arrive,

the formed Schindler this about

viewer

re-established its

earlier-been and

chaos s

can film

commandant, perception '

healing salvation

make

as

of ring

the

back world a

Through

paperwork have or

be

member carrying

onto of life.

your (and

the the turmoil

They rush

rescue

they

a

speech a

when

Is

turn scene,

story

Schindler murderers.

world

the

put not

a

moral

his act gold

will

of a come of

guards,

ending from

through

Jews

is

train

humanity

a

This chaos, death.

the

is audience's Germany

an for

than

the loaded final when described

population

emotional

the

of on minute

I workers

saves audience's The of It

of conditions

the

List

order

guards

orders

Likewise, read here.

during

Instead

emotional women the flee are Testament with

The husbands

But

that

should

Identifies

processed. Only

Schindler, his moral

state

all

last the of life,

because SS

It mark

that

the

this a

In scene

these men, Schindler

now

for

him New learns moral

when

the

their

much received one

nations film.

over, restored, as numb.

been

women

they're knows

Schindler'S machine. future.

possibility better

still

The diSPOSe

so the

have

does black

Addressing

do

be that

stage

a Schindler's the

the

must

have learns are

In

Brlnnlltz. explicitly is to war

creating

1945,

unthinkable. are,

haven to

the shower and the

He saves

point, now to

the

to war scene,

joy.

Auschwitz

a present

families

nor in

you to

Therefore, and

But

the

of Spielberg, how

they already

must they .

for

to

labor,

this

men world point

this

your

embrace

erase

May 7, know

For

Brinnlitz.

I Here superiors, to

At With

the

sent Schindler country have encoded confront manages

factory bands, moil, sense experienced created this

brought order The hope prevail on forces about German vidual. central

restored. at

audience

not throughout resolution.

slave workers InSCription that "Whoever not

­

a

a It

Is of

In at

As

be

for

the the

is the the

. But this

has and An­

is and mu­

that

Ger­ Nazi

add­

com

to

small

a

frame

It

stains

a death, As

resolu­

under­ a signals

woman

right. as another

brutally men that

excuses violence

foresha­

mirror has

beautiful Brinnlitz,

audience It

audience. idea Is the

desire by camp

the

ground

chaos

his of audience's on

follows is

open

he her.

to

revulsion workers. begun that two

the

level moral establish

the

The

Goeth. his

realized, to much Spielberg

the the

narrative.

scene Auschwitz with

Jewish

the

what

represents,

only

the to

his

has a

kiss

as

Brinnlitz, total Jews

and First, of

remove not

the

takes

identification.

audience

camera viewer's of that .

charging to

In

ensured to

down

plans

sacrifice

to

inside

to

his mirror. Again,

party,

intense Finally, mistreated

strikes subversive.

Goeth but

the

order

cavorts

the

scene, he

anticipation

The name fortune

extension

evil an

the

view, .

Goeth

delivered shut

have instead

and

child. over

behalf

juxtapose

subsequent

that strengthen

by

failing and

smoothly creating

of the desires

is In being to Jews.

shot, bullet

a workers

to

moral the

Schindler

Schindler'S

into

to

on and ground. personal terribly where of in knowledge

and entire

for

such

evil he

in

birthday

and

the his

twofold Is would

see deeply act confirmed

to

point herself

that

the

his

order ship

1,100

The

the him audience's

Is

officers

to

change

who woman Introductory together

act to but stares to

of

serves

tracking

any

audience

a border, the

fact himself

woman instead comfort

been

more

through

continues

The given

hiS

chaos

seen

because workers

Nazi the

nearly

house-boy

Goeth's the

the thank the lives of result

slow transport

Goeth

viewer has and

drops pieced Goeth

previously

has Jewish Schindler's a his

Auschwitz-Birkenau, even to

pOint,

In Polish

villa.

, to

his

order Schindler.

viewer

the with a

to

In moral

receives

are and the

The

Jews, both

observes fear boy

. Having to with

endanger

she

the of spends represents

the that

preparation this order

save

Spielberg before, the

him

precisely

savior.

to the

sight.

the In

to on

at

moral

he

him

aid cake

.

act shots comfort Goeth's

come

drinks

in

Goeth

switches

kisses pardons

with Inscribed reminiscent

safety

bathroom, depicting Goeth.

kissing

allow

to times

purchase

allowing and viewer's

repels an

prisoners

the ride

pierces

moral

he

are town

The of its audience

him raised

willing helpless, to

take

what

his from forward,

woman

Thus, time a of

Schindler

to

quickly been

Is restore for

and

to

The

Ott in

or

anticipation.

the fired scene shot

as

camera

many train has

contrasts horror manner the

form

way

finally Schindler is audience bring away

has a

will acts Schindler Goeth

so

moves

utterly prohibits

feet. comfort

Still and by day gunshot

The the

him Jewish

bathtub. comes view in

As remaining factory. brief the

is entrusted

the as

Brian A Goeth

and assured. camp

a

of

it.

in shot

of

a

law

he

all child and his business fear

in further Schindler

next

boy's to

stable-boy bribes

But

In

result, encouraged

tumultuous tion

nitions new He Czechoslovakian narrative a pletely death viewer ship Schindler man beats and that also dowed. gratitude, belief Schindler women, fear mines resolution Goeth teased the with ing point other restored. house-boy Is from signal then Spielberg's grows. guard, 452 his

The 454 Brian Ott Memorlaltzlng the Holocaust 455 interpreted as a symbolic crucifixion. Schindler Is so emotionally shaken In the film's final scene, the surviving Schindler Jews and their descen­ at this point that the ring falls from his hand. He drops to his kness as dants commemorate Oskar Schindler's herOic actions by plaCing stones on though collapsing under the weight of a symbolic cross. But his willing­ his grave site. As they file past his grave, visual text informs viewers first ness to bear this cross, to sacrifice himself to save the world Is confirmed that 'There are fewer than four thousand Jews left alive In Poland today," as he lifts the ring and slides it onto his finger. There Is a brief pause and and then that "There are more than six thousand descendants of the then Schindler begins his self-lashing. Schindler Jews." The juxtaposition of these two statements serves to drama­ I could have got more out. I could have got more. I don't know. If I just, I could have got tize the enormity of one IndlvtduaI's heroic actions. It Is only now that the more. If I'd made more money. I threw away so much money. You have no Idea. If I had moral order has been re-establlshed, that the audience has found emo­ just. I dldn't do enough. This car. Goeth would have bought this car. Why did I keep the tional succor, and that hope has been reborn that &htndler 's Ust can come, car? Ten people right there. Ten people. ten more people. This pin for two people. 'This Is must come, to an end. The film closes with the epigraph, "In memory of the gold. Two more people. He would have given me two more, at least one. He would have given me one. one more. One more person. A person, Stern. For this. I could have got more than six m1l110n Jews murdered." To the degree that the film Is Itself one more person and I dldn·t. a monument to the Holocaust, no ending could be more fitting. But In its desire to memorialize the Holocaust, &hindler's List shoulders our memory­ As Schindler falls to the ground weeping, "his Jews" huddle around him burden . and comfort him. He has died a symbolic death to efface the Sins of hu­ manity. Schindler's symbolic crucifixion provides a vehicle for the audi­ ence's own outpouring of emotion. The moment of his symbolic death is for MEMORY CONSCIENCE AND ·SCHINDLER'S LIST" humanity a symbollc rebirth. This rebirth Is expressed visually in the next scene as Schindler's Jews awaken to a new day and begin descending a In the final section of this essay, I have three objectives: to review briefly sun-drenched hillside to the nearby town where they will begtn their lives how Schindler'S List relieves us of our memory-burden, to consider the anew. subsequent SOCial and political Implications, and to propose some future Schindler'S self-castigation is the first In a series of cathartic scenes that possibilities. Spielberg's film ·works" rhetOrically by using the narrative to Spielberg builds into the ending of Schindler's List. The next scene, for create deSires which are then satisfied within the narrative. Since Spielberg instance, portrays Goeth's execution. Visual text informs viewers that" Amon structures the film to eliminate self-reflective spaces, the viewer succumbs Goeth was arrested while a patient in a sanitarium at Bad Tolz. He was to It. The narrative In Schindler's List begins by positioning the viewer In a hanged In Krak6w for crimes against humanity." Though brief, the scene Is world of moral chaos represented on one level by the Holocaust and on Significant, To the extent that Goeth represents evil. witnessing his pun­ another by Goeth. It then fosters a desire for moral resolution and comfort Ishment (death) Is cathartic In that It both assures the viewer that evil has which It ultimately fulf1l1s through Oskar Schindler. This narrative struc­ been destroyed and Justice has been served. Oddly enough, the scene Is ture has several notable consequences . First, it functions to privilege an almost comedic. The executioner's difficulty in kicking the box from be­ individual perspective over a social one. The result Is an Americanized story neath Goeth's feet adds a certain levity that reinforces the viewer's plea­ that neither suggests agents have any kind of social responsibility nor en­ sure in witnessing his death. Spielberg cuts next to a view of Schindler's courages viewers to consider larger Issues of community and social con­ enamelware factory In Krak6w. The image Is augmented with biographical science. Another consequence of the narrative structure Is that It forces information about Oskar Schindler. The text-which reads, "In 1958, he closure upon the viewer. When &hindler's Ust ends, when the (hi)story was declared a righteous person by the council of the Yad Vashem in Jeru­ comes to a close, so too does the Holocaust. There Is no Invitation to con­ salem, and invited to plant a tree in the Avenue of Righteousness. "-reaf­ nect memory of the Holocaust with contemporary events. By forcing firms both the perception of Schindler as moral hero and the Idea of new resolution and comfort upon the viewer, the f1Im fails to suggest itself as a life. When the camera returns to Schindler's Jews making their way down baSis for sociopolitical action and the viewer is absolved of such action. To the hlllside, the audience, armed with the knowledge that evil has been put it bluntly, the film subverts posslbtUties for human agency. Further­ destroyed, senses the promise of a better future. In the Spielberg world, more, it suggests that the atrOCities of the Holocaust have not substantially promises made by the narrative are always fulfilled in the narrative. Slowly, altered our vision of human dignity. In short, we are left with the dan­ the words, "It grows there st1l1," appear on the screen. They suggest to the gerous idea that we need not actively guard against the poSSlbtUty of this audience that like Schindler's tree, the Schlndleljuden have taken root and historical catastrophe occurring again. prospered. This perception Is further strengthened as black-and-white Is In light of the conclusions I have drawn about Schindler's List, I would transformed into color, past Into present, and the reel Schindler Jews into like to briefly address two related questions, one practical and the other the real Schindler Jews. more theoretical. Question 1: Is It possible to use Schindler's List as a 456 Brian Ott Memorializing the Holocaust 457 productive tool for educating students about the Holocaust? In brief. yes. 3. The World Jewtsh Congress vetoed Splelberg's request to shoot inside Auschwttz-Blrkenau. Students can engage In memory-work If they are prompted to think criti­ As part of a compromise, however, Spielberg was allowed to build a replica of the death cally about the film and Its silences. Though the film does not readily Invite camp Just outside of Its gate. In the scene where Schindler'S Jews are seen coming Into an individual to conSider questions about racism or the political conditions Auschwitz by traIn, the train Is actually leavIng the real death camp and entering Splelberg's mirror set. Thus. a sense of spatial reality Is maintained . See Richardson that would allow Hitler to come to power. there Is no reason why these (1994, p. 93). questions cannot be asked. In fact. given the human rights violations cur­ 4. Rafferty (1993), for Instance. calls It an "historical drama' (p. 130), while Pallot (1994), rently taking place around the globe. these are questions that need to be descrIbes It as an -hIstOrical eplc- (p. 238). asked. Question 2: Is It possible to construct public memorials that do not relieve Individuals of their memory-burden? Again. the answer Is yes. The References key Is for public memorials to transform public spaces Into public spheres. "Far too often," argues Young (1993). "a communlty's monuments assume Alleva. R. (1994. February 11). Saintly SybarIte: SpIelberg's SchIndler. Commonweal, the polished finished veneer of a death mask. unreflective of current memory. pp. 16-18. unresponsive of contemporary Issues" (p. 14). In other words. forms that Bodnar, J. (1992). Remaking America: Public Memory, Commemoration, and Patriotism In the are too pleasing risk fading. along with memory. into the landscape. Once Twentieth Century. PrInceton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Dlegmueller. K. (1994. March 30). -Schindler's List" spurring calls for Holocaust Education. they are . they are out of mind. The best public memorials Education Week, p. 13. confront the viewer and unsettle him such that his identity Is destabilized EpsteIn, J . (1994, July). RethInkIng Schindler'S LIst. Utne Reader. pp. 136-138. and memory-work is activated. Washington's Holocaust Museum Is one GUlis, J . (Ed.). (1994). Commemorations: The PoIUJcs-oJNatlonfll Identity . Princelon. NJ: Princeton example of a memorial that prompts viewers to consider serious questions UnIverSity Press. Kaplan, H. (1994). Conscience and Memory: Meditations In a Museum oj the Holocaust. about our collective moral quality without attempting to answer them. To ChIcago: UnIverSIty of Chicago Press. the degree that memory-work calls upon individuals to be active agents In Kolker, R. (1988). A Cinema oj Loneliness. 2nd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press. society. the public memorials that activate memory-work. that weave them­ Langer, L. (1995). Admitting the Holocaust: CoUected Essays. New York: Oxford UnIversity selves Into the course of ongOing events. playa central role In creating a Press. more democratic society. Llpstadt, D. (1993). Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory. New York: Free Press. In his review of Schlndler's List for Corrunonweal magazine. Alleva ( 1994) Metz, C. (1974). FUm Language: A Semiotics oj the CInema. Chicago: University of Chicago wrote. "ThIs is a story not of unallevlated suffering but of succor and res­ Press. cue" (p. 17). His assessment is. of couse. accurate. Through the story of NagorskI, A. (1994, July). "Schindler's List" and the PolIsh Question . Foreign Affairs, Oskar Schindler. Spielberg restores the human spirit. comforts us. and pp. 152-157 . leaves humanity healing. maybe with a scar. but definitely not an open Ottenhoff, J. (1994. February 16). NamIng the Dead. Christian Century, pp. 172-175. wound. Splelberg's film relieves us of our memory-burden precisely be­ Pallot, J. (Ed.). (1994). The Motion PIcture Guide: 1994 Annual. New York: News America Pub- lishing Inc. cause It offers moral resolution of! comfort from a memory that should be Rafferty, T. (1993, December 20). A Man of Transactions. New Yorker, pp. 129-132. neither resolved nor comforting. Writing orf Holocaust literature. Langer Richardson, J. (1994, January). Steven's Choice. Premiere, pp. 67-72. (1995) asks. "How much darkness must we acknowledge before we will be Rlchler, M. (1994, June). Why I Hate Schindler's LIst. Saturday Night, pp. 34,68 . able to confess that the Holocaust story cannot be told In terms of heroiC Schlckel. R. (1993, December 13). Heart of Darkness: Ghosts In their mUlions haunt Steven dignity. moral courage. and the triumph of the human spirit?" (p. 158). Splelberg's powerful Schlndler's LIst. Time, pp. 75-77. Schindler's Welsh. J . (1994) . SchIndler's LIst. In F. Maglll (Ed.). Maglll 's Cinema Annual 1994 List Is surely an artistic wonder to be marveled at, but like a (pp. 307-310). Pasadena, CA: Salem Press. stone obelisk this monument refuses to engage us in a dialogue. Young. J. (1993). The Texture oj Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning. New Haven: Yale UnIversity Press. Notes

1. For a more extended discussion of memory-work. see the Introduction to James Young's The Texture oj Memory. The Issue of connecting public memory of the Holocaust to social conscience Is also theorIZed by Lawrence Langer In Admitting the Holocaust, Deborah Llpstadt tn Denying the Holocaust, and Harold Kaplan In Conscience and Memory. More general discussions of memory as It relates to sociopolitical action can be found In John Bodnar's Remaking America and John GUlis's edited volume. Commemorations. 2. Dlegmueller's article In Education Week outlInes the current public debate over Holocaust education and traces the role Schindler's LIst has played In that debate.