Waikato Law Review Taumauri Volume 19, Issue 2, 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Waikato Law Review Taumauri Volume 19, Issue 2, 2011 WAIKATO LAW REVIEW TAUMAURI VOLUME 19, ISSUE 2, 2011 An Account of the Making of the Human Rights Amendment Act 2001 Margaret Wilson Indigenous Peoples: Negotiating Constitutional Reconciliation and Legitimacy In Canada Paul LAH Chartrand Indigenous Rights – Hollow Rights? Valmaine Toki Rights Denied: Orang Asli and Rights to Participate in Decision-making in Peninsular Malaysia Yogeswaran Subramaniam The Punitive Turn in Post-Colonial Sentencing and the Judicial Will to Civilise Dr Thalia Anthony The Rangatahi Court Matiu Dickson “Three Strikes” Sentencing: Another Blow for Ma–ori Wayne Rumbles Frozen Rights? The Right to Develop Ma–ori Treaty and Aboriginal Rights Dr Robert Joseph What Is The Place Of Corrective Justice In Criminal Justice? Simon Connell Charitable Trusts and Political Activity: Time for a Change? Juliet Chevalier-Watts Reform of the Civil Justice System: The New Meaning of Justice and the Mitigation of Adversarial Litigation Culture Les Arthur Legal Positivism in the Pre-Constitutional Era of Late Nineteenth-Century Iran Sadeq Bigdeli Missing the Point? Law, Functionalism and Legal Education in New Zealand W John Hopkins A Thorn in the Flesh that Cannot Fester: Habermas, the Duluth Model, Domestic Violence Programmes Philip Rossiter WAIKATO LAW REVIEW WAIKATO LAW REVIEW TAUMAURI VOLUME 19, Issue 2, 2011 An Account of the Making of the Human Rights Amendment Act 2001 1 Margaret Wilson Indigenous Peoples: Negotiating Constitutional Reconciliation and Legitimacy In Canada 14 Paul LAH Chartrand Indigenous Rights – Hollow Rights? 29 Valmaine Toki Rights Denied: Orang Asli and Rights to Participate in Decision-making in Peninsular Malaysia 44 Yogeswaran Subramaniam The Punitive Turn in Post-Colonial Sentencing and the Judicial Will to Civilise 66 Dr Thalia Anthony The Rangatahi Court 86 Matiu Dickson “Three Strikes” Sentencing: Another Blow for Ma–ori 108 Wayne Rumbles Frozen Rights? The Right to Develop Ma–ori Treaty and Aboriginal Rights 117 Dr Robert Joseph What Is The Place Of Corrective Justice In Criminal Justice? 134 Simon Connell Charitable Trusts and Political Activity: Time for a Change? 145 Juliet Chevalier-Watts Reform of the Civil Justice System: The New Meaning of Justice and the Mitigation of Adversarial Litigation Culture 160 Les Arthur Legal Positivism in the Pre-Constitutional Era of Late Nineteenth-Century Iran 174 Sadeq Bigdeli Missing the Point? Law, Functionalism and Legal Education in New Zealand 188 W John Hopkins A Thorn in the Flesh that Cannot Fester: Habermas, the Duluth Model, Domestic Violence Programmes 196 Philip Rossiter Guest Editor Wayne Rumbles Editorial Assistants Gay Morgan and Dr Robert Joseph EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Chief Justice, The Honourable Dame Sian Elias (honorary member), Chief Justice of New Zealand. Professor John Borrows, JD, PhD, FRSC, Robina Professor of Law, Policy and Society, University of Minnesota Law School. Professor Penelope Pether, Professor of Law, School of Law, Villanova University. Associate Professor T Brettel Dawson, Department of Law, Carleton University, Academic Director, National Judicial Institute (Canada). Gerald Bailey, QSO, LLB (Cant), Hon D (Waikato), Consultant Evans Bailey, Lawyers, former Chancellor of University of Waikato and member of the Council of Legal Education. Sir David Baragwanath, Honorary Professor, University of Waikato, Judge of the Appeals Chamber of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, The Hague. Professor John Farrar, LLB (Hons) (London), LLM (London), LLD (London), PhD (Bristol), Emeritus Professor of Law, Bond University, Professor of Corporate Governance, University of Auckland. Deputy Chief Judge Caren Fox, Mäori Land Court. Judge Stephanie Milroy, Mäori Land Court. Dr Joan Metge, Law and Society, with particular interests in law’s role in an ethnically diverse society. Professor Margaret Bedggood, QSO, LLB (Otago), MA (NZ and London), former Chief Human Rights Commissioner. The Honourable Justice Paul Heath, Judge of the High Court of New Zealand. The Honourable Sir Eddie Durie, KNZM, first Mäori appointed as a Justice of the High Court of New Zealand, and leading legal expert on the Treaty of Waitangi. Professor Alex Frame, LLB (Auck) LLM, LLD (Well), former Chair in Te Piringa – Faculty of Law, University of Waikato and Director of Te Matahauariki Research Institute. Professor Paul Hunt, Department of Law, University of Essex, member of the Human Rights Centre, University of Essex and Adjunct Professor, University of Waikato. The Honorable Justice Joseph Williams, Judge of the High Court of New Zealand. Judge Peter Spiller, Honorary Professor of Law, University of Waikato. Associate Professor Morné Olivier, School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand. Professor Michael Hahn, Chair of European Law, University of Lausanne, Honorary Professor of Law, Te Piringa – Faculty of Law, University of Waikato. The Waikato Law Review is published annually by Te Piringa – Faculty of Law at The University of Waikato. Subscription to the Review costs $40 (domestic) and $45 (international) per year; and advertising space is available at a cost of $200 for a full page or $100 for a half page. Back numbers are avail- able. Communications should be addressed to: The Editor Waikato Law Review Te Piringa – Faculty of Law The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton 3240 New Zealand North American readers should obtain subscriptions direct from the North American agents: Wm W Gault & Sons Inc 3011 Gulf Drive Holmes Beach Florida 34217-2199 USA This issue may be cited as (2011) 19:2 Wai L Rev. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be produced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any retrieval system, without permission from the editor. ISSN 1172-9597 EDITORS’ INTRODUCTION I am pleased to present the second issue of the Waikato Law Review for 2011. This special issue draws together a number of articles which were developed from papers presented at the Justice in the Round: Perspectives from Custom and Culture, Rights and Dispute Resolution Conference held at Te Piringa – Faculty of Law in April 2011. The conference theme was derived, in part, from aspects of the three founding goals of Te Piringa – Faculty of Law. These goals are the understanding of law in its contexts; developing bi- cultural legal understandings; and fostering professionalism in our students. In reflecting the Fac- ulty’s commitment to biculturalism, the conference was intended to foster achieving this goal in its own right, as well as reflecting New Zealand’s unique identity in an increasingly multi-cultural society, with a bi-cultural foundation. In affirming the Faculty’s commitment to law in context, the conference gathered a group of people already “working for justice”, to consider “justice” and conceptions of justice in the institutional, ideological, and cultural contexts in which they are cur- rently situated, and to consider how both the ideas and their realisation in fact, might be improved or redesigned. Our goal was to further a dialogue about what constitutes “justice in the round”.1 While at first glance the Table of Contents may seem an eclectic mix, each paper presents its perspective on justice, reflecting on the past, present and possible futures. The first two papers are derived from the plenary sessions of the conference. Margaret Wil- son’s paper “Mainstreaming Human Rights in Public Policy: An Account of the Role of Human Rights Amendment Act 2001” offers a unique insight into the recent legislative history and it relationship to policy. The second plenary paper is from Paul Chartrand, “Indigenous Peoples: Negotiating Constitutional Reconciliation and Legitimacy in Canada”, which argues that the po- litical action of the Indigenous peoples of Canada are important for law and political processes out of which constitutional and legal norms emerge. The remaining papers draw on the themes of rights, policy and reform illustrated in the ple- nary papers albeit through different lenses. These papers explore the rights of indigenous people in Australia, Malaysia, Canada, the United States and here in Aotearoa. Policy is explored in a number of contexts including: charitable trusts, legal education, and domestic violence. Commen- tary on legal reforms explores both the criminal and civil arena from nineteenth-century Iran to twenty first century Aotearoa/New Zealand. It was also pleasing that a number of the papers are from post-graduate students as well as experienced academics and practitioners. I am sure that in this special issue there will be something of interest for all readers and hope you enjoy reading it. I would like to express my thanks to all the contributors and reviewers without which this special edition would not be possible, especially in light of some of the tight deadlines. My thanks must also go to Gay Morgan and Robert Joseph for editorial assistance and support. I would also like to thank Diane Lowther for her timely and excellent copy editing, Amanda Colmer from A2Z Design for layout support, and Janine Pickering for her administrative support, institutional knowledge and keen eye. Wayne Rumbles Guest Editor 1 Brenda Midson “Conference Welcome” Justice in the Round Conference Handbook (University of Waikato, April 2011). AN ACCOUNT OF THE MAKING OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS AMENDMENT ACT 2001 BY MARGARET WILSON* 1. INTRODUCTION In this paper I want to address the relationship between policy and law through a discussion of the 2001 Amendment to the New Zealand Human Rights Act 1993. Discussions of justice often focus on analysis of court decisions or legislation. Legal policy is not often analysed or the process by which legal policy is formed and incorporated into the law. This paper is an attempt to try and fill that gap through a description of the process to enact the 2001 Human Rights Amendment Act. The narrative is based on my experience so it is acknowledged at the outset that others involved in the process may hold different views. I shall argue that the way in which human rights have been incorporated into New Zealand’s legal system reflects the underlying constitutional relationship between the Parliament and the courts.
Recommended publications
  • From Privy Council to Supreme Court: a Rite of Passage for New Zealand’S Legal System
    THE HARKNESS HENRY LECTURE FROM PRIVY COUNCIL TO SUPREME COURT: A RITE OF PASSAGE FOR NEW ZEALAND’S LEGAL SYSTEM BY PROFESSOR MARGARET WILSON* I. INTRODUCTION May I first thank Harkness Henry for the invitation to deliver the 2010 Lecture. It gives me an opportunity to pay a special tribute to the firm for their support for the Waikato Law Faculty that has endured over the 20 years life of the Faculty. The relationship between academia and the profession is a special and important one. It is essential to the delivery of quality legal services to our community but also to the maintenance of the rule of law. Harkness Henry has also employed many of the fine Waikato law graduates who continue to practice their legal skills and provide leadership in the profession, including the Hamilton Women Lawyers Association that hosted a very enjoyable dinner in July. I have decided this evening to talk about my experience as Attorney General in the establish- ment of New Zealand’s new Supreme Court, which is now in its fifth year. In New Zealand, the Attorney General is a Member of the Cabinet and advises the Cabinet on legal matters. The Solici- tor General, who is the head of the Crown Law Office and chief legal official, is responsible for advising the Attorney General. It is in matters of what I would term legal policy that the Attorney General’s advice is normally sought although Cabinet also requires legal opinions from time to time. The other important role of the Attorney General is to advise the Governor General on the appointment of judges in all jurisdictions except the Mäori Land Court, where the appointment is made by the Minister of Mäori Affairs in consultation with the Attorney General.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascertaining the Meaning of Legislation – a Question of Context
    629 ASCERTAINING THE MEANING OF LEGISLATION – A QUESTION OF CONTEXT Cathy Nijman* It has been said that "no word in an Act can be safely interpreted out of its context". Yet, Parliament was sufficiently concerned about the courts' use of external context as an aid to statutory interpretation to decide consciously to omit reference to "context" when enacting section 5(1) of the Interpretation Act 1999. This paper investigates the reasons for Parliament's concern. It examines cases decided before and after the enactment of section 5(1) to establish past and present judicial practice when using external context as an interpretive aid. The paper concludes that the omission of "context from section 5(1) has not altered the courts' principled approach to matters of interpretation, and it demonstrates that consideration of external context is an essential corollary to the purposive approach to statutory interpretation mandated by Parliament for over 100 years. I INTRODUCTION Statutory interpretation was at the heart of the case described by the late Lord Cooke of Thorndon1 "[as] perhaps as important for the future of our country as any that has come before a New Zealand Court".2 New Zealand has placed heavy reliance on statute law since the country was first settled as a British colony.3 That early preference for statute law, accompanied by close attention to statutory construction and scheme, permeates much of New Zealand's legal history and * Submitted as part of the LLB(Hons) programme at Victoria University of Wellington. 1 Robin Brunskill Cooke, Baron Cooke of Thorndon, 9 May 1926-30 August 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Spiritual Significance of Nature: Guidance for Protected and Conserved Area Governance and Management
    Cultural and spiritual significance of nature: Guidance for protected and conserved area governance and conserved area management Guidance for protected Cultural and spiritual significance of nature: Cultural and spiritual significance of nature Guidance for protected and conserved area governance and management Bas Verschuuren, Josep-Maria Mallarach, Edwin Bernbaum, Jeremy Spoon, Steve Brown, Radhika Borde, Jessica Brown, Mark Calamia, Nora Mitchell, Mark Infield, Emma Lee Craig Groves, Series Editor Developing capacity for a protected planet Best Practice Protected Areas Guidelines Series No. 32 international council on monuments and sites IUCN WCPA’s BEST PRACTICE PROTECTED AREA GUIDELINES SERIES IUCN-WCPA’s Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines are the world’s authoritative resource for protected area managers. Involving collaboration among specialist practitioners dedicated to supporting better implementation of ideas in the field, the Guidelines distil learning and advice drawn from across IUCN. Applied in the field, they build institutional and individual capacity to manage protected area systems effectively, equitably and sustainably, and to cope with the myriad of challenges faced in practice. The Guidelines also assist national governments, protected area agencies, non-governmental organisations, communities and private sector partners in meeting their commitments and goals, and especially the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Programme of Work on Protected Areas. A full set of guidelines is available at: www.iucn.org/pa_guidelines Complementary resources are available at: www.cbd.int/protected/tools/ Contribute to developing capacity for a Protected Planet at: www.protectedplanet.net/ IUCN PROTECTED AREA DEFINITION, MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES AND GOVERNANCE TYPES IUCN defines a protected area as: A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for a Rejang-Indonesian-English Dictionary
    PACIFIC LING U1STICS Series D - No. 58 MATERIALS FOR A REJANG - INDONESIAN - ENGLISH DICTIONARY collected by M.A. Jaspan With a fragmentary sketch of the . Rejang language by W. Aichele, and a preface and additional annotations by P. Voorhoeve (MATERIALS IN LANGUAGES OF INDONESIA, No. 27) W.A.L. Stokhof, Series Editor Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Jaspan, M.A. editor. Materials for a Rejang-Indonesian-English dictionary. D-58, x + 172 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1984. DOI:10.15144/PL-D58.cover ©1984 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. PACIFIC LINGUISTICS is issued through the Linguistic Circle of Canberra and consists of four series: SERIES A - Occasional Papers SERIES B - Monographs SERIES C - Books SERIES D - Special Publications EDITOR: S.A. Wurm ASSOCIATE EDITORS: D.C. Laycock, C.L. Voorhoeve, D.T. Tryon, T.E. Dutton EDITORIAL ADVISERS: B.W. Bender K.A. McElhanon University of Hawaii University of Texas David Bradley H.P. McKaughan La Trobe University University of Hawaii A. Capell P. MUhlhiiusler University of Sydney Linacre College, Oxford Michael G. Clyne G.N. O'Grady Monash University University of Victoria, B.C. S.H. Elbert A.K. Pawley University of Hawaii University of Auckland K.J. Franklin K.L. Pike University of Michigan; Summer Institute of Linguistics Summer Institute of Linguistics W.W. Glover E.C. Polome Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Texas G.W. Grace Malcolm Ross University of Hawaii University of Papua New Guinea M.A.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of the Philippines A
    Languages of the Southern Gateway A Phrase Book of CHAVACANO SINAMA TAUSUG YAKAN and including ENGLISH and PILIPINO A Joint Project of the Department of Education, Culture and Sports and The Summer lnstitute of Linguistics Additional copies of this publication are available from BoDep P. 0. Box 2270 CPO 1099 Manila, Philippines Copyright " 1979 by The Summer Institute of Linguistics All rights reserved 57-120PH-894042N ISBN 971-18-0131-0 PAUNANG SALlTA Bahagi ng ating yaman ang pagkakaroon ng iba't ibang wika at kultura sa ating bansa. Iba't ibang wika ang sinasalita ng iba't ibang pangkat na naninirahan sa ating kapuluan. Ikinararangal nating pangalagaan ang mayamang pamanang pangkalinangan ng mga pangkat na ito upang palaganapin ang pagkakaisa at ang pagmamalaki sa pambansang pagkakakilanlan. Ang aklat na ito na nasusulat sa isa sa mga katutubong wika sa Pilipinas ay naglalayong paunlarin ang kasanayan sa pagbasa at pagkaunawa, dagdagan ang kaalaman, patindihin ang pagrnamalaki sa unang wika, at ihanda ang esdtudyante sa pagtanggap sa pambansang wika. Sa ganitong lapit, mawiwiling magbasa ang isang batang bag0 pa lamang natututong magbasa, at nagkakaroon siya ng tiwala sa sarili. Dahil dito'y nasisiyahan siyang magpatuloy ng pag-aaral upang maging bahagi ng pagpapaunlad ng bansa. Ikinararangal ng Kagawaran ng Edukasyon, Kultura at Isports na ipakilala ang aklat na ito bilang pinakahuli sa isang serye ng mga aklat na naglalayong palaganapin ang pagkatutong bumasa at sumulat. Sa pamamagitan ng pagpapalakas sa mga pangkat linggwistiko, pinalalakas din natin ang bansa. LOURDES R. QUISUMBING Kalihim CONTENTS Section I: Language and Culture Cultural and Historical Setting .................
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Pēpi
    ABOUT NGĀI TAHU–ABOUT NEW ZEALAND–ABOUT YOU KANA/SPRING 2017 $7.95 75 Settlement Pēpi TE TĪMATANGA O TE KERĒME – WAI27 • THE NGĀI TAHU TREATY SETTLEMENT WITH THE CROWN: KEY PLAYERS AND BACKGROUND • POST SETTLEMENT – THE JOURNEY SO FAR • KELVIN ANGLEM: A GOOD MAN • TE KERĒME – A REFLECTION BY TĀ TIPENE O’REGAN • DOUBLE OSCAR WINNER HAMMOND PEEK • THE SOUTH ISLAND LANDLESS NATIVES ACT (SILNA) 1906 – HISTORY AND UNRESOLVED TENSIONS • WHITE MAN’S BURDEN REVISITED NOW AVAILABLE TO DOWNLOAD ON APPLE AND ANDROID DEVICES It will tell you the name of the artist and song title as it’s playing LIVE - you can even change the language to te reo Maori DOWNLOAD IT NOW ii TE KARAKA KANA 2017 KANA/SPRING 2017 74 10 TE TĪMATANGA O TE KERĒME – WAI27 Dr Te Maire Tau provides an introduction to the recollections of his late father, Rakiihia Tau (Snr). In 1986 Rakiihia filed the Ngāi Tahu Claim with the Waitangi NGĀ HAU Tribunal and was heavily involved in the negotiation processes. Thanks to his E WHĀ detailed recording of these events and the generosity of his whānau we are FROM THE able to share Rakiihia’s account of this significant time. EDITOR 10 This year marks 20 years since the signing of the Deed of Settlement, a defining moment in a journey of over 150 years, which brought an end to the pain and struggle of a griev- ing people. And with this closure came a new beginning, with $170m plus add-ons in the bank and a newly formed organisa- tional structure to manage the settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 INTRODUCTION Andre Brönnimann with two of the subjects of his winning portrait - Ria Wihapi Waikerepuru and Te Rawanake Robinson-Coles at the opening of the Adam Portraiture Award 2016. Treasurers, first John Sladden and then Richard 2016 was a year of Tuckey, to improve the quality of our budgets and endeavour, rewarded financial control. We are all very grateful for the commitment, the good humour and fellowship that over almost all of the full David brought to our affairs. Our fellow Trustee, Mike Curtis – a Partner with Deloitte – continued as range of our activities. It Chairman of the Finance and Planning Committee. presented us with a number In December we were pleased to be able to elect two new Trustees. Dr. David Galler, a well-known of challenges, ones of intensive care specialist in Auckland, and the personnel; of gallery space; author of a recent bestselling book about his life and work, Things That Matter. David brings his of governance; and, as wide knowledge of Auckland to our deliberations, along with a strong management background and always, of funding. a life-long interest in art. Helen Kedgley, who was Director of the Pātaka Art and Museum in Porirua But I would like to start by stating my own personal pleasure and satisfaction at the excellence of last year’s exhibition programme, a view that is shared, I know, by many of you. Quite apart from their intrinsic interest, and the pleasure as well as insight that they bring, these presentations are enhancing our reputation nationally and leading to increased cooperation with galleries and collectors both in this country and overseas.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence
    Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence Editor Dr Richard A Benton Editor: Dr Richard Benton The Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence is published annually by the University of Waikato, Te Piringa – Faculty of Law. Subscription to the Yearbook costs NZ$40 (incl gst) per year in New Zealand and US$45 (including postage) overseas. Advertising space is available at a cost of NZ$200 for a full page and NZ$100 for a half page. Communications should be addressed to: The Editor Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence School of Law The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton 3240 New Zealand North American readers should obtain subscriptions directly from the North American agents: Gaunt Inc Gaunt Building 3011 Gulf Drive Holmes Beach, Florida 34217-2199 Telephone: 941-778-5211, Fax: 941-778-5252, Email: [email protected] This issue may be cited as (2010) Vol 13 Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence. All rights reserved ©. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1994, no part may be reproduced by any process without permission of the publisher. ISSN No. 1174-4243 Yearbook of New ZealaNd JurisprudeNce Volume 13 2010 Contents foreword The Hon Sir Anand Satyanand i preface – of The Hon Justice Sir David Baragwanath v editor’s iNtroductioN ix Dr Alex Frame, Wayne Rumbles and Dr Richard Benton 1 Dr Alex Frame 20 Wayne Rumbles 29 Dr Richard A Benton 38 Professor John Farrar 51 Helen Aikman QC 66 certaiNtY Dr Tamasailau Suaalii-Sauni 70 Dr Claire Slatter 89 Melody Kapilialoha MacKenzie 112 The Hon Justice Sir Edward Taihakurei Durie 152 Robert Joseph 160 a uNitarY state The Hon Justice Paul Heath 194 Dr Grant Young 213 The Hon Deputy Chief Judge Caren Fox 224 Dr Guy Powles 238 Notes oN coNtributors 254 foreword 1 University, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen, I greet you in the Niuean, Tokelauan and Sign Language.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Collection Survey on Outer-Ring Fishing Ports Development in the Republic of Indonesia
    Data Collection Survey on Outer-ring Fishing Ports Development in the Republic of Indonesia FINAL REPORT October 2010 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) A1P INTEM Consulting,Inc. JR 10-035 Data Collection Survey on Outer-ring Fishing Ports Development in the Republic of Indonesia FINAL REPORT September 2010 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) INTEM Consulting,Inc. Preface (挿入) Map of Indonesia (Target Area) ④Nunukan ⑥Ternate ⑤Bitung ⑦Tual ②Makassar ① Teluk Awang ③Kupang Currency and the exchange rate IDR 1 = Yen 0.01044 (May 2010, JICA Foreign currency exchange rate) Contents Preface Map of Indonesia (Target Area) Currency and the exchange rate List of abbreviations/acronyms List of tables & figures Executive summary Chapter 1 Outline of the study 1.1Background ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 1 1.1.1 General information of Indonesia ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 1 1.1.2 Background of the study ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 2 1.2 Purpose of the study ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 3 1.3 Target areas of the study ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 3 Chapter 2 Current status and issues of marine capture fisheries 2.1 Current status of the fisheries sector ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 4 2.1.1 Overview of the sector ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 4 2.1.2 Status and trends of the fishery production ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 4 2.1.3 Fishery policy framework ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 7 2.1.4 Investment from the private sector ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 12 2.2 Current status of marine capture fisheries ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 13 2.2.1 Status and trends of marine capture fishery production ・・・・・・・ 13 2.2.2 Distribution and consumption of marine
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Versus Auditory Processing Preference and Mode of Presentation
    1 Running head: VISUAL VERSUS AUDITORY PROCESSING Visual versus Auditory Processing Preference and Mode of Presentation: Differences in Confidence, Attention, and Recall Performance in Online Learning Lucas Burns University of Missouri Author Note Lucas Burns, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri—Columbia, Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lucas Burns, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri. Email: [email protected] 2 VISUAL VERSUS AUDITORY PROCESSING Abstract This study examined three styles of presentation (audio, video, and text) instructors commonly use in online classrooms in relation to two learning preferences (visual and auditory), on free-recall performance, confidence in answers, and attention to lecture. Each participant (N = 40) had their learning preference assessed using the Style of Processing scale (SOP; Childers, Houston, & Heckler, 1985). To account for order effects, 36 conditions were generated using a Qualtrics survey and participants were then randomly assigned to view all presentation styles. It was predicted that visual learners would outperform auditory learners on recall performance, confidence in answers, and attention to the video lecture. It was also predicted that auditory learners would outperform visual learns on recall performance, confidence in answers, and attention to the audio and text lectures. However, an analysis of variance revealed no significant main effect for either learning preference or mode of presentation. No
    [Show full text]
  • Manurau: a Conceptual Framework of Māori Leadership Practice in the New Zealand Public Sector
    Manurau: A conceptual framework of Māori leadership practice in the New Zealand public sector By Daryn Bean A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Government Victoria University of Wellington 2018 1 | Page Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 5 He Mihi ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Dedication .............................................................................................................................................. 8 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 9 Moe Mai Rā ...................................................................................................................................... 10 List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... 12 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Chapter One: Introduction ......................................................................................................... 13 Overview .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Penal Populism?
    The Power of Penal Populism: Public Influences on Penal and Sentencing Policy from 1999 to 2008 By Tess Bartlett A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Criminology View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington School of Social and Cultural Studies Victoria University of Wellington June 2009 Abstract This thesis explains the rise and power of penal populism in contemporary New Zealand society. It argues that the rise of penal populism can be attributed to social, economic and political changes that have taken place in New Zealand since the post­war years. These changes undermined the prevailing penal­welfare logic that had dominated policymaking in this area since 1945. It examines the way in which ‘the public’ became more involved in the administration of penal policy from 1999 to 2008. The credibility given to a law and order referendum in 1999, which drew attention to crime victims and ‘tough on crime’ discourse, exemplified their new role. In its aftermath, greater influence was given to the public and groups speaking on its behalf. The referendum also influenced political discourse in New Zealand, with politicians increasingly using ‘tough on crime’ policies in election campaigns as it was believed that this was what ‘the public’ wanted when it came to criminal justice issues. As part of these developments, the thesis examines the rise of the Sensible Sentencing Trust, a unique law and order pressure group that advocates for victims’ rights and the harsh treatment of offenders.
    [Show full text]