A Performance Audit of the Utah Transit Authority

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Performance Audit of the Utah Transit Authority REPORT TO THE UTAH LEGISLATURE Number 2014-06 A Performance Audit of the Utah Transit Authority August 2014 Office of the LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR GENERAL State of Utah STATE OF UTAH Office of the Legislative Auditor General 315 HOUSE BUILDING • PO BOX 145315 • SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5315 (801) 538-1033 • FAX (801) 538-1063 Audit Subcommittee of the Legislative Management Committee President Wayne L. Niederhauser, Co–Chair • Speaker Rebecca D. Lockhart, Co–Chair JOHN M. SCHAFF, CIA Senator Gene Davis • Representative Jennifer M. Seelig AUDITOR GENERAL August 26, 2014 TO: THE UTAH STATE LEGISLATURE Transmitted herewith is our report, A Performance Audit of the Utah Transit Authority (Report #2014-06). A digest is found on the blue pages located at the front of the report. The objectives and scope of the audit are explained in the Introduction. We will be happy to meet with appropriate legislative committees, individual legislators, and other state officials to discuss any item contained in the report in order to facilitate the implementation of the recommendations. Sincerely, John M. Schaff, CIA Auditor General JMS/lm Digest of a Performance Audit of the Utah Transit Authority This report presents an in-depth follow-up to portions of our 2008 and 2012 performance audits of the Utah Transit Authority (UTA). We also reviewed UTA development projects, including transit-oriented developments (TODs) for the first time. UTA is a large multi-modal transit agency with a service area in six counties that includes almost 80 percent of the state’s population. In 2013, about 65 percent of UTA’s revenue ($312 million) came from sales tax collections. Federal support and passenger revenues are also important sources of revenue. UTA provides many valuable services to the community and was recently recognized as the best large transit system in the country by the American The UTA board has Public Transportation Association. Issues raised in this report focus on already approved where UTA needs to further improve oversight, bolster controls, and refine policy changes processes. In response to this audit, the UTA board has already approved addressing all the policy changes addressing all of the recommendations in Chapters II and III recommendations in of this report. The board and UTA management are also in the process of Chapters II and III of this report. reviewing the recommendations in the other chapters for implementation. Chapter II Development Projects Need Better Control and Oversight Questions Exist with the Draper FrontRunner Parking Structure. This is a complex project with many levels of legal documentation. We are concerned with the decision to prepay $10 million to a developer to UTA prepaid for a construct a future garage even though there were no design specifications or future parking immediate plans for construction. Further, two-and-a-half years later, UTA structure, which is against UTA internal hired another contractor to build the garage, but the developer no longer policy and practice. had all the funds immediately available to repay UTA. UTA is still owed $1.7 million. Simply stated, the $10 million prepayment was against UTA policy and practice and appears to us very unusual. Additional concerns include the lack of a cost-benefit analysis, the adequacy of legal documentation, the release of valuable collateral for questionable collateral, the difficulty UTA had supporting $1.5 million in site preparation work, and the general lack of documentation and changing explanations we experienced throughout the audit. The lack of sufficient control and oversight can put taxpayer funds at risk. Office of the Utah Legislative Auditor General - i - An independent law Questions Exist with Jordan Valley TOD Site. Some UTA employees firm concluded that question the procurement process used to select the developer on the Jordan UTA’s agreements with Valley TOD project. We also believe some aspects of the procurement the developer appear process are concerning. Further, the development agreement UTA signed to favor the developer. with the developer appears to us and an independent law firm (Snell and Wilmer) to be overly favorable to the developer. Snell and Wilmer believe that some of the provisions of the contract are “far out of market.” Lastly, to date, $26 million in federal and state funds have been spent on infrastructure and two parking structures at the Jordan Valley project site. The developer’s portion of these costs was set at $3,896,000, but the developer has not yet paid this amount. Better Procedures and Increased Controls Will Improve TOD Process. The number and severity of concerns identified in the two development projects we reviewed warrant increased procedures, better controls, and improved oversight. For example, the TOD function had been operating under the Office of the General Counsel at UTA. This placement created a significant segregation of duty concern. Also, UTA’s internal auditor must take on a more visible role with TOD oversight and provide better information to UTA’s board. During the audit some members of the board told us they were aware of the segregation of duty concern, and had been in The UTA board has the process of correcting it before the audit began. The board did take action taken action to correct segregation of duty by creating a new position for property development (TOD) that will be concerns and better separate from the general counsel’s office, the position has not yet been filled. control for risks at In addition, the board has also approved new policies that implement all the UTA. other recommendations in this chapter. Chapter III UTA Should Benchmark Total Compensation UTA Executive Compensation Includes Large Bonuses and Special The UTA board Benefits. Besides base salary and standard benefits, UTA provides additional recently approved compensation to executives. Top executives at UTA receive bonuses and policy changes addressing every special benefits not available to other UTA employees, including two types recommendation in of deferred compensation plans and car allowances. The two highest-paid Chapter III. employees at UTA also have special life insurance benefits. UTA’s general counsel is also given a special retirement package that doubles his years of service credit for his first ten years of employment (thus increasing his lifetime benefit by about $50,000 per year above the normal pension). UTA Compensation Higher Than UDOT or SLC Department of Airports. The audit team was specifically asked to compare UTA executive compensation to the Utah DOT and the Salt Lake City Airport by the audit requestor and UTA’s board chair, respectively. UTA’s total compensation is high when compared to these two agencies. Some positions, such as general A Performance Audit of the Utah Transit Authority (August 2014) - ii - counsel, are paid significantly higher than at these other entities. We also attempted to compare total compensation of UTA executives with comparable positions at other transit agencies. However, there was concern with the reliability of the data and since the audit recommendations do not depend on the transit comparison; and since UTA has committed to conducting their own total compensation survey, we decided against reporting the transit comparison. UTA Did Not Report All Compensation Information to Transparency Despite being made Website. Utah’s transparency website, transparent.utah.gov, was created by aware that not all the Legislature in 2008 to promote transparency and accountability in public compensation was agencies. UTA did not report portions of employee compensation being reported, UTA management still information from this website, thus obstructing accountability to the public underreported and circumventing the intent of the statute. We raised this issue with UTA compensation in 2013. management several months prior to their submission of 2013 compensation The UTA board information, yet UTA did not correct the omissions prior to submitting recently approved a 2013 information. The UTA board recently approved a policy change new policy to correct this issue. requiring UTA management to submit all compensation data to the transparency website. Chapter IV Financial Constraints Affect Asset Upkeep, Bus Service, and New Projects UTA Faces Financial Constraints. Our 2012 audit indicated that UTA’s revenue and expense projections were optimistic. This follow-up review found that UTA has adjusted projections to make them more reasonable. Nonetheless, as previously reported, the rapid expansion of rail lines has sharply increased debt payments, thereby reducing the funds available for operations and maintenance (O&M) costs. Because debt service, O&M, and capital costs will exceed revenues for most years until 2020, UTA plans on drawing down its reserves to maintain services. The debt service to sales tax ratio steadily increases until 2018. Rail Upkeep Costs Are Significant and Currently Underfunded. As we followed up on our prior audit work on UTA revenues and costs, an important concern arose that had not been addressed in our last audit, which is state-of-good-repair (SGR) costs. SGR refers to the maintenance, overhaul, and replacement of assets. UTA’s board is aware of this issue and has made it a priority. Unfortunately, these future SGR costs are significant The UTA board is with a potential $2.9 billion in expenses up to 2033. Because these cost have aware of future SGR been recently identified, UTA has not yet worked much of these costs into its costs and prioritized long-term planning documents. However, the UTA board is aware of future full funding in its 2020 strategic plan. SGR costs and prioritized full funding in their 2020 strategic plan. Office of the Utah Legislative Auditor General - iii - UTA has reduced bus Bus Service Has Suffered Due to Financial Constraints. Our 2012 audit service because of report stated the following: “As UTA begins to integrate more rail lines financial constraints, within its current system, route adjustments and additional service cuts may which has led be needed.
Recommended publications
  • 2018-2023 TIP Project Table Listing
    2018 – 202 3 Tra nspo rtation Improvement Program (TIP) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) 2018-2023 PR OJECTS For the WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL COUNCIL (WFRC) AREA Including a separate listing of the following programs Urban Surface Transportation Program (STP), Congestion Mitigation/ Air Quality Program (CMAQ), Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Other Federal Highway Federal Transit Administration Funds State Funds Administration Funds National Highway Performance Sec. 5303 – MPO & Statewide Planning Interstate Maintenance (IM) Sec. 5307 – Urbanized Area Formula National Highway System (NHS) Bridge On State System State Construction Sec. 5309 – Capital Investment Program Bridge Replace ment Off Centenn ial Highway Funds – New Starts System – Local Critical Highway Need Funds Sec. 5309 – Capital Investment Program Off System – Op ti on al Highway Cons tructi on - – Bus Minimum Guarantee Program Sec. 5309 – Capital Investment –Fixed Highway Safety Improvement State General Funds Guide-way Modernization Safety Any Area State Traffic Corr idor - Sect. 5310 – Elderly Persons and Rail/ Highway Crossing – Preservati on Persons with Disabilities Hazard Elimination Transportation Inv estment Sec. 5320 – Transit in Parks Program Rec reati on al Trail s Program - Fund (TIF) Safe Routes to Schoo l STP - Any Area Statewide Sec. 5337 – State of Good Repair TIGER Discretionary Funds Other Federal Funds Sec. 5339 – Buses and Bus Facilities Section includes; • Glossary of Federal Funding Types • Projects included in the 2018-2023 Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Salt Lake Area Multifamily Market
    THE GREATER SALT LAKE AREA MULTIFAMILY MARKET THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE MULTIFAMILY REPORT | 2019 REVIEW + 2020 OUTLOOK PREFACE TABLE OF CBRE is pleased to release the 2020 Greater Salt Lake Area Multifamily Market Report, the most current and comprehensive CONTENTS multifamily data available for the Salt Lake Area/Wasatch Front market. Produced by Eli Mills and Patrick Bodnar of CBRE, this report has been assembled to empower the decision making of multifamily professionals active in the Utah market. This report has been prepared with current data sourced from a survey of over half the multifamily market (60,000+ units) along the Wasatch Front Area inclusive of Salt Lake, Utah, Davis and Weber Counties. Minimum reporting requirements were identified for each city and county by class, type and size. Data contributions and validations to this publication were made by: • CBRE Research • Utah Department of Economics • CBRE Econometric Advisors • University of Utah Bureau of Economics and Business Research • Yardi Matrix • Construction Monitor • Axiometrics • CoStar • Western States Multifamily Whatever your multifamily needs may be, please reach out to us. CBRE has the most comprehensive data on the market and can provide information on a macro or micro level based on class, city, submarket, zip code, location, age, size, proximity to rail stops, and many other variations. CBRE consistently leads the market, with national multifamily investment sales totaling over $33.3 billion in 2019 (Source: Real Capital Analytics). As the leader in multifamily sales every year since 2001, the exposure of CBRE is second-to-none. With 65 locations and over 300 multifamily professionals, including direct lending services, CBRE’s unparalleled multifamily platform has a competitive presence in Utah and an enhanced investment reach into the multifamily space, providing our clients with the greatest market exposure available.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Volumes
    Sandy Downtown 2020 2021 Contents 1– INTRODUCTION �������������������������������������������������� 6 2– GOALS AND POLICIES ���������������������������������������������� 8 3– SAFETY ANALYSIS ������������������������������������������������ 14 4– DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ������������������������������������� 36 5– ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ������������������������������������������ 62 6– TRANSIT ������������������������������������������������������� 74 7– TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT & PARKING ��������������������������� 84 8– CONCLUSION ��������������������������������������������������� 86 2 | SANDY DOWNTOWN TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN | 2020 List of Figures Figure 1–1 Sandy Downtown Study Area ���������������������������������������������������������������7 Figure 3–1 Sandy Downtown Crash Rate per Million Vehicle Miles Travelled ����������������������������������16 Figure 3–2 Sandy Downtown All Crashes Heatmap (2016-2018) �������������������������������������������17 Figure 3–3 Sandy Downtown Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes (2016-2018) ����������������������������������18 Figure 3–4 Sandy Downtown Bicycle Crashes (2016-2018) ������������������������������������������������20 Figure 3–5 Sandy Downtown Pedestrian Crashes (2016-2018) ���������������������������������������������21 Figure 3–6 Sandy Downtown Non-State Route Crashes Heatmap (2016-2018) ��������������������������������23 Figure 3–7 Centennial Parkway and 10080 South Crashes by Crash Type (2016-2018) ��������������������������24 Figure 3–8 Centennial Parkway and 10080 South Crash
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Trustees of the Utah Transit Authority
    Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Utah Transit Authority Wednesday, July 22, 2020, 9:00 a.m. Remote Electronic Meeting – No Anchor Location – Live-Stream at https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=utaride NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING CIRCUMSTANCES DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC: In keeping with recommendations of Federal, State, and Local authorities to limit public gatherings in order to control the continuing spread of COVID-19, and in accordance with Utah Governor Gary Herbert’s Executive Order on March 18, 2020 suspending some requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, the UTA Board of Trustees will make the following adjustments to our normal meeting procedures. • All members of the Board of Trustees and meeting presenters will participate electronically via phone or video conference. • Public Comment will not be taken during the meeting but may be submitted through the means listed below. Comments submitted before 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 21st will be distributed to board members prior to the meeting: o online at https://www.rideuta.com/Board-of-Trustees o via email at [email protected] o by telephone at 801-743-3882 option 5 (801-RideUTA option 5) – specify that your comment is for the board meeting. • Meeting proceedings may be viewed remotely through YouTube live-streaming. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=utaride 1. Call to Order & Opening Remarks Chair Carlton Christensen 2. Safety First Minute Sheldon Shaw 3. Consent Chair Carlton Christensen a. Approval of July 15, 2020 Board Meeting Minutes 4. Agency Report Carolyn Gonot 5. August 2020 Change Day Service Plan Approval Mary DeLoretto, Laura Hanson 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 in Review.Cdr
    2011 Year in Review From the General Manger The past year has been momentous for the Utah Transit Authority. With a dedicated and talented team and strong community participation, we marked a year of progress and transformation. We simultaneously opened two new light rail lines ahead of schedule and under budget in August, while increasing system-wide ridership to more than 41 million trips—a six percent increase relative to the previous year. In conjunction with the new TRAX openings, we modified bus services. Community input played a critical role as we planned our bus service transitions. As we plan for the future, the public remains the richest resource for research and needs analyses. We will continue to invite public participation as we prepare the openings of our newest FrontLines 2015 projects. This past year we also renewed our pledge to keep safety our highest priority, as we will every year. We work hard to plan and engineer the safest possible transportation systems. To supplement our engineering, we will continue to do our utmost to educate and enforce measures designed to keep our riders and the public safe. It remains our number-one priority. For example, working with the international organization Operation Lifesaver, UTA team members will be seen throughout our service areas at schools, businesses and community groups talking about how to be safe around trains. We will remember 2011 as an incredible year. With hard work and continued community support, 2012 will be just as transformative and memorable. Michael Allegra General Manager Utah Transit Authority FrontLines 2015 Progress Frontlines 2015 Progress in 2011 UTA continues to make substantial progress on the $2.8 billion FrontLines 2015 project.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAX RED LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    TRAX RED LINE light rail time schedule & line map TRAX Red Line View In Website Mode The light rail line TRAX Red Line has 5 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) To Central Pointe: 11:30 PM (2) To Central Pointe: 6:31 PM - 11:16 PM (3) To Daybreak Parkway: 4:42 AM - 10:50 PM (4) To University: 4:51 AM - 5:06 AM (5) To University Medical: 4:46 AM - 10:16 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest TRAX RED LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next TRAX RED LINE light rail arriving. Direction: To Central Pointe TRAX RED LINE light rail Time Schedule 11 stops To Central Pointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 11:19 PM University Medical Center Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City Tuesday 11:19 PM Fort Douglas Station Wednesday 11:30 PM 200 South Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City Thursday 11:30 PM University South Campus Station Friday 11:30 PM 1790 East South Campus Drive, Salt Lake City Saturday 11:20 PM Stadium Station 1349 East 500 South, Salt Lake City 900 East Station 845 East 400 South, Salt Lake City TRAX RED LINE light rail Info Direction: To Central Pointe Trolley Station Stops: 11 605 E 400 S, Salt Lake City Trip Duration: 26 min Line Summary: University Medical Center, Fort Library Station Douglas Station, University South Campus Station, 217 E 400 S, Salt Lake City Stadium Station, 900 East Station, Trolley Station, Library Station, Courthouse Station, 900 South Courthouse Station Station, Ballpark Station, Central Pointe Station 900 South Station 877 S 200 W, Salt Lake City Ballpark Station 212 W 1300 S, Salt Lake City Central Pointe Station Direction: To Central Pointe TRAX RED LINE light rail Time Schedule 16 stops To Central Pointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 7:36 PM - 8:36 PM Monday 6:11 PM - 10:56 PM Daybreak Parkway Station 11383 S Grandville Ave, South Jordan Tuesday 6:11 PM - 10:56 PM South Jordan Parkway Station Wednesday 6:31 PM - 11:16 PM 5600 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah's 2011-2040 Unified Transportation Plan
    2011 - 2040 udot.utah.gov 131949.indd 1 7/31/13 2:23 PM UTah’S UNifieD PLaN ParTNerS CaChe MPO 179 North Main, Suite 305 Logan, UT 84321 (435) 716-7154 www.cachempo.org Dixie MPO 1070 West 1600 South, Bldg. B St. George, UT 84770 (435) 673-3548 www.dixiempo.org MOUNTaiNLaND aSSOCiaTiON Of GOverNMeNTS 586 east 800 North Orem, UT 84097 (801) 229-3800 www.mountainland.org UTah DeParTMeNT Of TraNSPOrTaTiON Systems Planning and Programming 4501 South 2700 West – Box 143600 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 (801) 965-4129 www.udot.utah.gov UTah TraNSiT aUThOriTy 669 West 200 South Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (801) 262-5626 www.rideuta.com WaSaTCh frONT reGiONaL COUNCiL 295 North Jimmy Doolittle road Salt Lake City, UT 84116 (801) 363-4250 www.wfrc.org 131949.indd 2 7/31/13 2:23 PM TaBLe Of CONTeNTS introduction 2 - Letter from the Chairs of the Utah Transportation Commission and Utah’s Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) - Letter from the Directors of the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and Utah’s MPOs - Purpose of Unified Transportation Planning UDOT’s Long range Plan 8 Utah MPO Long range Plans 12 - Wasatch Choices 2040 (Weber, Davis, Salt Lake and Utah Counties) - envision Cache valley (Cache County) - vision Dixie (Washington County) Utah’s Population Growth Challenge 16 Utah’s Project Planning & funding Process 20 - Project Development Process - Utah’s Transportation Needs and Preferences - financial Plan and assumptions - Continuous, Cooperative and Comprehensive Planning highway Projects by region 34 regionally important Transportation Projects 34 Utah highway Projects Map 35 highway Projects Phase One (2011-2020) 36- 41 highway Projects Phase Two (2021-2030) 42-46 highway Projects Phase Three (2031-2040) 47-50 highway Projects Unfunded 51 -52 Cache valley highway Projects Map 53 Wasatch front Ogden/Layton area highway Projects Map 54 Wasatch front Salt Lake valley highway Projects Map 55 Utah valley area highway Projects Map 56 Dixie area highway Projects Map 57 Transit Projects by region 58 Transit Projects Phase One (2011-2020) 59.
    [Show full text]
  • June 8, 2017 to Members of Trans
    June 8, 2017 To Members of Trans Com and Other Interested Persons: A meeting of Trans Com will be held on Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. at the Wasatch Front Regional Council offices located at 295 North Jimmy Doolittle Road in Salt Lake City. The agenda will be as follows: 1. ACTION on minutes of April 20, 2017 meeting 2. Opportunity for public comment 3. Transportation Improvement Program a. Board Modifications to the 2017-2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) b. ACTION: Board Modifications to the 2017-2022 TIP c. ACTION: Release of Draft 2018-2023 TIP and Air Quality Conformity Analysis for Public Comment 4. Utah Transit Authority State of Good Repair Priority 5. Active Transportation Plan Standards 6. Traffic Signal Performance Metrics 7. Other business Sincerely, Mayor Karen Cronin Chair Note: Informational materials can be located on WFRC’s website at www.wfrc.org Public participation is solicited without regard to age, sex, disability, race, color or national origin. Persons who require translation for a meeting should contact the WFRC’s Title VI Administrator at 801-363-4250 or [email protected] at least 72 hours in advance. Se solicita la participación del público, sin importar la edad , el sexo , la discapacidad, la raza, color o nacionalidad. Personas que requieren servicios de traducción deben contactar a WFRC’s Administrador de Titulo VI al teléfono 801-363-4250 o [email protected] por lo menos 72 horas antes de la reunión. Trans Com April 20, 2017 Page 1 DRAFT TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE (Trans Com) Minutes Meeting of April 20, 2017 Mayor Karen Cronin, Chair, called Trans Com to order at 2:01 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Transit Authority Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Local Advisory Council REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
    669 West 200 South Utah Transit Authority Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Local Advisory Council REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, June 2, 2021 1:00 PM Frontlines Headquarters NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING CIRCUMSTANCES DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC: In accordance with the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, (Utah Code § 52-4-207.4), the UTA Local Advisory Council will make the following adjustments to our normal meeting procedures. • All members of the Local Advisory Council and meeting presenters will participate electronically. • Meeting proceedings may be viewed remotely through the WebEx meeting platform (see below) or by following the instructions and link on the UTA Board Meetings page - https://www.rideuta.com/Board-of-Trustees/Meetings • Public Comment may be given live during the meeting. See instructions below. o Use this WebEx link and follow the instructions to register for the meeting (you will need to provide your name and email address) https://rideuta.webex.com/rideuta/onstage/g.php?MTID=ed2f6fab6a382e44c85991cd71728f914 o Sign on to the WebEx meeting portal through the “join event” link provided in your email following approval of your registration. o Sign on 5 minutes prior to the meeting start time o Comments are limited to 3 minutes per commenter. • Public Comment may also be given through alternate means. See instructions below. o Comment via email at [email protected] o Comment by telephone at 801-743-3882 option 5 (801-RideUTA option 5) – specify that your comment is for the Local Advisory Council meeting. o Comments submitted before 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 1st will be distributed to council members prior to the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • OPPORTUNITY ZONE - INLAND PORT Foxboro Davis County North North Salt Lake County Salt INDUSTRIAL LAND 16-140 ACRES | SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Lake AB67
    Valentine Estates Cottage Homes AB93 OPPORTUNITY ZONE - INLAND PORT Foxboro Davis County North North Salt Lake County Salt INDUSTRIAL LAND 16-140 ACRES | SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Lake AB67 Mystical LOCATION North of I-80 (exit S River 7200 W), west of Airport SIZE 140 Acres Davis CountyPRICE Salt Lake County $6 per square foot Wasatch Parcel A: 22.54 ac. = $5,891,760.07National G r e a t Parcel B: 16.57 ac. = $4,331,179.51Forest S a l t Parcel C: 33.40 ac. = $8,730,887.58 L a k e Subject Parcel D: $5 per square foot 75.98 LDS Store Storehouse CAPITAL ac.= $16,548,44 Easton Distribution Center AB68 ZONE Industrial SLC Port Salt Lake City Global Logistics International Center, a 7.5 Million Airport Square Foot Development 268 186 Utah School and AB AB Institutional Trust Lands Administration ¨¦§15 ¨¦§80 ¨¦§215 Salt Lake City AB269 AB154 AB270 State St State Lee Kay State Wildlife Center ¤¡89 AB71 South AB201 Salt ¨¦§80 Lake AB172 AB111 Zachary Hartman | [email protected] 6443 North Business Park Loop Road, Suite 12, Park City, Utah 84098 ph. 801.573.9181 | www.landadvisors.com The information contained herein is from sources deemed reliable. We have no reason to doubt its accuracy but do not guarantee it. It is the responsibility of the person reviewing this information to independently verify it. This package is subject to change, prior sale or complete withdrawal. UTSaltLake192642 - 12.19.19 PROPERTY DETAIL MAP Zachary Hartman | 801.573.9181 | www.landadvisors.com Parcel D 75.98 acres Parcel A 22.54 acres 1700 N New State Prison Under Construction Parcel B 16.57 SLC Road acres 8000W 1400 N Parcel C 33.40 acres HaulRoad 7200W 7600W UDOTRoad 1200 N Legend Future Roads K 0 500 1,000 8400W Feet 192642-33764 02-13-19 While Land Advisors Organization® makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information, there is no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of furnished data.
    [Show full text]
  • Route F590-9000 South Flex F590
    For Information Call 801-RIDE-UTA (801-743-3882) outside Salt Lake County 888-RIDE-UTA (888-743-3882) Route F590-9000 South Flex www.rideuta.com F590 HOW TO USE THIS SCHEDULE Determine your timepoint based on when you want to 9000 South Flex leave or when you want to arrive. Read across for your destination and down for your time and direction of travel. Jordan Valley Station A route map is provided to help you relate to the Rt. 232, 240, Red line 27 T -Route Transfer point timepoints shown. Weekday, Saturday & Sunday schedules 00 W differ from one another. Historic Sandy Sandy Pk R Station UTA SERVICE DIRECTORY Jordan edw T Rt. F94, Blue line Ÿ General Information, Schedules, Trip Planning and Valley Stat ood R Customer Feedback: 801-RIDE-UTA (801-743-3882) Hospital e St wy Ÿ Outside Salt Lake County call 888-RIDE-UTA (888-743- d T 9000 S 9000 S T 8960 S 3882) T 300 E T Rt. 525 Rt. 201 Ÿ Fairchild Rt. 218 For 24 hour automated service for next bus available use option 1. Have stop number and 3 digit route Bangert Semiconductor SLCC I- number (use 0 or 00 if number is not 3 digits). Jordan Campus 15 Ÿ Pass By Mail Information 801-262-5626 er Hwy Ÿ For Employment information please visit http://www.rideuta.com/careers/ Ÿ Travel Training 801-287-2275 LOST AND FOUND 9000 S Weber/South Davis: 801-626-1207 option 3 Wights F *The bus could deviate within the shaded area up to 2 deviations per trip.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Utah Bicycle Master Plan
    2011 University of Utah Bicycle Master Plan PREPARED BY: Alta Planning + Design and Psomas PREPARED FOR: University of Utah Facilities Department Cory Higgins Director for Plant Operations John McNary Director for Campus Design & Construction Michael G. Perez Associate Vice President for Facilities Management Gordon Wilson Assistant Vice President for Auxiliary Services Alma Allred Director for Commuter Services Tami Cleveland Project Manager - Campus Planner Joseph Harman Campus Design & Construction Manager Chad Larsen Commuter Services Bicycle Manager Ray Wheeler Assoc. Director for Space Planning and Management Myron Willson Director for Office of Sustainability Robert Miles Utah Department of Transportation - Region 2 Tom Millar Mayor's Bicycle Advisory Committee Chad Mullins Salt Lake County Bicycle Advisory Committee Lisa Pascadlo - Detective Salt Lake City Police - Bicycle Liaison Becka Roolf Salt Lake City Transportation Julianne Sabula UTA - Engineering and Construction Planner Lynette Seebohm University of Utah Health Care - Asst. V.P. Garth Smith University of Utah Police Department Steve Panish University of Utah Health Sciences – Asst. V.P. Charles Evans Director for Research Park This Page Intentionally Left Blank 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Goals & Objectives........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]