DOCSLIB.ORG

Traffic Volumes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Traffic Volumes Sandy Downtown 2020 2021 Contents 1– INTRODUCTION �������������������������������������������������� 6 2– GOALS AND POLICIES ���������������������������������������������� 8 3– SAFETY ANALYSIS ������������������������������������������������ 14 4– DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ������������������������������������� 36 5– ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ������������������������������������������ 62 6– TRANSIT ������������������������������������������������������� 74 7– TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT & PARKING ��������������������������� 84 8– CONCLUSION ��������������������������������������������������� 86 2 | SANDY DOWNTOWN TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN | 2020 List of Figures Figure 1–1 Sandy Downtown Study Area ���������������������������������������������������������������7 Figure 3–1 Sandy Downtown Crash Rate per Million Vehicle Miles Travelled ����������������������������������16 Figure 3–2 Sandy Downtown All Crashes Heatmap (2016-2018) �������������������������������������������17 Figure 3–3 Sandy Downtown Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes (2016-2018) ����������������������������������18 Figure 3–4 Sandy Downtown Bicycle Crashes (2016-2018) ������������������������������������������������20 Figure 3–5 Sandy Downtown Pedestrian Crashes (2016-2018) ���������������������������������������������21 Figure 3–6 Sandy Downtown Non-State Route Crashes Heatmap (2016-2018) ��������������������������������23 Figure 3–7 Centennial Parkway and 10080 South Crashes by Crash Type (2016-2018) ��������������������������24 Figure 3–8 Centennial Parkway and 10080 South Crash Locations (2016-2018)��������������������������������25 Figure 3–9 Mall Ring Road/Centennial Parkway Crashes by Crash Type (2016-2018) ����������������������������26 Figure 3–10 Mall Ring Road/Centennial Parkway Crash Locations (2016-2018)��������������������������������27 Figure 3–11 9000 South and I-15 Interchange Crashes by Crash Type (2016-2018) �����������������������������28 Figure 3–12 9000 South and State Street Crashes by Crash Type (2016-2018) ���������������������������������29 Figure 3–13 9000 South and Monroe Street Crashes by Crash Type (2016-2018) �������������������������������30 Figure 3–14 10600 South and I-15 Interchange Crashes by Crash Type (2016-2018) ����������������������������31 Figure 3–15 10600 South and Auto Mall Drive Crashes by Crash Type (2016-2018) �����������������������������32 Figure 3–16 10600 South and State Street Crashes by Crash Type (2016-2018) ��������������������������������33 Figure 4–1 Existing (2019) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes �������������������������������������������������38 Figure 4–2 Existing PM Peak Hour Level of Service �������������������������������������������������������40 Figure 4–3 Existing Pedestrian Network ���������������������������������������������������������������42 Figure 4–4 Weekly Pedestrian Actuations (2019) ��������������������������������������������������������43 Figure 4–5 Anticipated Development – Downtown Area �������������������������������������������������44 Figure 4–6 Assumed Trip Distribution �����������������������������������������������������������������47 Figure 4–7 Existing Plus Planned Traffic Volumes – PM Peak Hour ������������������������������������������48 Figure 4–8 Existing Plus Planned Development Level of Service ��������������������������������������������50 Figure 4–9 Monroe Street and 9000 South Intersection Improvement Conceptual Design ����������������������51 Figure 4–10 Year 2050 No Interchange 9400 South ������������������������������������������������������56 Figure 4–11 Year 2050 Partial Interchange 9400 South – Access to/from South I-15 ����������������������������57 Figure 4–12 Year 2050 Full Interchange 9400 South ������������������������������������������������������58 Figure 4–13 2050 Roadway Functional Classification �����������������������������������������������������60 Figure 5–1 Sandy Downtown Existing Bicycle Network ���������������������������������������������������63 Figure 5–2 Sandy Downtown Bicycle Activity �����������������������������������������������������������65 Figure 5–3 Sandy Downtown Existing and Planned Bicycle Network ����������������������������������������67 Figure 5–4 Sandy Downtown Existing Pedestrian Network �����������������������������������������������68 Figure 5–5 Sandy Downtown Pedestrian Activity ��������������������������������������������������������69 Figure 5–6 Sandy Downtown Planned Pedestrian Network �����������������������������������������������71 Figure 5–7 Sandy Downtown Micro-Mobility Destination Heatmap �����������������������������������������72 Figure 6–1 Existing Transit Service in Sandy Downtown ��������������������������������������������������75 Figure 6–2 Regional Transportation Plan Projects �������������������������������������������������������78 Figure 6–3 Other Transit Concepts �������������������������������������������������������������������80 Figure 6–4 Sandy Downtown Circulator Bus Concept Plans �����������������������������������������������81 | SANDY DOWNTOWN TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN | 3 List of Tables Table 3–1 Fatal Crash Characteristics (2016-2018) �������������������������������������������������������19 Table 3–2 Non-State Route Hotspot Locations (2016-2018) �����������������������������������������������22 Table 4–1 Intersection Level of Service ����������������������������������������������������������������39 Table 4–2 Anticipated Development Summary ���������������������������������������������������������45 Table 4–3 Downtown Trip Generation �����������������������������������������������������������������46 Table 4–4 Intersection Options Level of Service ���������������������������������������������������������53 Table 4–5 Potential Improvement Comparison ���������������������������������������������������������55 Table 7–1 Potential Roadway Projects �����������������������������������������������������������������88 Table 7–2 Potential Transit Projects �������������������������������������������������������������������88 Table 7–3 Potential Active Transportation Projects ������������������������������������������������������89 4 | SANDY DOWNTOWN TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN | 2020 | SANDY DOWNTOWN TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN | 5 INTRODUCTION 1 6 | SANDY DOWNTOWN TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN | 2020 Sandy City has a flourishing downtown with dozens Figure 1–1 shows what is referred to in this study as of successful businesses, offices, and entertainment “Sandy downtown." The roughly 1,000-acre area is venues that have a large regional draw. Downtown bordered on the north by 9000 South, the east by the areas make up the backbone of any community, and TRAX Blue line, the south at 10600 South, and the west their large concentrations of destinations present by Interstate 15. unique transportation challenges and opportunities. Healthy downtowns provide a variety of transportation options, with infrastructure design that allows for all systems to work in concert with each other. The purpose of this study is to examine the transportation systems currently in place in Sandy downtown, and to offer insight and recommendations for future improvements that will allow the area to continue as a healthy, vibrant, and safe downtown for generations to come. Figure 1–1 Sandy Downtown Study Area INTRODUCTION | SANDY DOWNTOWN TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN | 7 GOALS AND POLICIES 2 he goals and policies outlined in this section are designed to promote Ttransportation choices that provide real options in how we choose to get around and increase the number of easily reached destinations. While these goals and policies are citywide, they also apply for the Sandy downtown area. 8 | SANDY DOWNTOWN TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN | 2020 The goals and policies from the 2009 Transportation and improve mobility on major roadways Master Plan (TMP) were used as a starting point to while providing an overall system that will develop this section of the report. These current (or support adjacent land uses. Discourage new) goals and policies have been reviewed and local street access directly onto arterials. approved by the city’s Transportation Master Plan 6. Design Standards – Require all roads and roadway Steering Committee. features to meet minimum design standards established by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Streets (AASHTO); require all signs, pavement markings, Goal: Design, maintain, and operate streets that and traffic control signals to meet standards provide safe and effective movement of people and established by the Manual of Uniform Traffic goods. Control Devices (MUTCD), and related roadway standards established by State, Federal, or Policies: local law. Exceptions to applicable standards 1. Multi-Modal Streets – Design roadways to maximize may be granted by the CIty Transportation use for all modes of transportation including: Engineer on a case-by-case basis and shall personal vehicles, trucks, transit, bicycles, and demonstrate innovative superiority or other pedestrians. Encourage a practical balance advantages over existing standards. between multiple modes while realizing that 7. Maintenance – Consider maintenance private passenger vehicles will continue to aspects in the planning and design of the be an important means of transportation. street system. Minimize life cycle costs 2. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) – Consider through preventative maintenance. solutions that will increase capacity without necessarily increasing the number of roadways or travel lanes. Improve the efficiency
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Greater Salt Lake Area Multifamily Market
    THE GREATER SALT LAKE AREA MULTIFAMILY MARKET THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE MULTIFAMILY REPORT | 2019 REVIEW + 2020 OUTLOOK PREFACE TABLE OF CBRE is pleased to release the 2020 Greater Salt Lake Area Multifamily Market Report, the most current and comprehensive CONTENTS multifamily data available for the Salt Lake Area/Wasatch Front market. Produced by Eli Mills and Patrick Bodnar of CBRE, this report has been assembled to empower the decision making of multifamily professionals active in the Utah market. This report has been prepared with current data sourced from a survey of over half the multifamily market (60,000+ units) along the Wasatch Front Area inclusive of Salt Lake, Utah, Davis and Weber Counties. Minimum reporting requirements were identified for each city and county by class, type and size. Data contributions and validations to this publication were made by: • CBRE Research • Utah Department of Economics • CBRE Econometric Advisors • University of Utah Bureau of Economics and Business Research • Yardi Matrix • Construction Monitor • Axiometrics • CoStar • Western States Multifamily Whatever your multifamily needs may be, please reach out to us. CBRE has the most comprehensive data on the market and can provide information on a macro or micro level based on class, city, submarket, zip code, location, age, size, proximity to rail stops, and many other variations. CBRE consistently leads the market, with national multifamily investment sales totaling over $33.3 billion in 2019 (Source: Real Capital Analytics). As the leader in multifamily sales every year since 2001, the exposure of CBRE is second-to-none. With 65 locations and over 300 multifamily professionals, including direct lending services, CBRE’s unparalleled multifamily platform has a competitive presence in Utah and an enhanced investment reach into the multifamily space, providing our clients with the greatest market exposure available.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate 2 Template
    Density and Walkable Communities Reid Ewing Professor & Chair City and Metropolitan Planning University of Utah [email protected] Department of City & Metropolitan Planning, University of Utah www.company.com MRC Research at 5 Geographic Scales • Region • Neighborhood • MXD • TOD • Block Department of City & Metropolitan Planning, University of Utah www.company.com Elasticities Convenient Way of Summarizing Relationships Dimensionless So Perhaps Transferable www.company.com NEIGHBORHOOD SCALE Department of City & Metropolitan Planning, University of Utah www.company.com 5Ds of Compact Development Density Mobility Design Diversity Accessibility Livability Destination Distance Accessibility to Transit Sustainability www.company.com Fairview Village www.company.com Southern Village www.company.com Metro Square www.company.com Meta-Analysis www.company.com Rich Literature • More than 200 Empirical Studies • Collectively Relate All Aspects of Travel to All Aspects of Built Environment • Vast Majority Control for Sociodemographic Differences • Vast Majority Use Statistical Methods • A Few Come Close to the Normative Model www.company.com Weighted average elasticities of walking Distance to nearest transit stop Job within one mile Percentage of 4-way intersection Intersection/street density Distance to a store Jobs-housing balance Land use mix (entropy index) Commercial floor area ratio Job density Household/population density -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4www.company.com 15 Region Database www.company.com Households and trips Survey Date Surveyed Households Surveyed Trips Atlanta 2011 9,575 93,681 Austin 2005 1,450 14,249 Boston 2011 7,826 86,915 Denver 2010 5,551 67,764 Detroit 2005 939 14,690 Eugene 2011 1,679 16,563 Houston 2008 5,276 59,552 Kansas City 2004 3,022 31,779 Minneapolis-St.
    [Show full text]
  • 701 Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    701 light rail time schedule & line map To Draper View In Website Mode The 701 light rail line (To Draper) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) To Draper: 4:23 AM - 11:15 PM (2) To Fashion Place West: 10:26 PM - 11:26 PM (3) To Salt Lake Central: 4:56 AM - 10:11 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 701 light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 701 light rail arriving. Direction: To Draper 701 light rail Time Schedule 24 stops To Draper Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 5:50 AM - 8:13 PM Monday 5:50 AM - 11:13 PM Salt Lake Central Station 330 South 600 West, Salt Lake City Tuesday 4:23 AM - 11:15 PM Old Greektown Station Wednesday 4:23 AM - 11:15 PM 530 W 200 S, Salt Lake City Thursday 4:23 AM - 11:15 PM Planetarium Station Friday 4:23 AM - 11:15 PM 400 West, Salt Lake City Saturday 5:50 AM - 11:13 PM Arena Station Temple Square Station 102 W South Temple St, Salt Lake City 701 light rail Info City Center Station Direction: To Draper 10 W 100 S, Salt Lake City Stops: 24 Trip Duration: 52 min Gallivan Plaza Station Line Summary: Salt Lake Central Station, Old 270 S Main St, Salt Lake City Greektown Station, Planetarium Station, Arena Station, Temple Square Station, City Center Station, Courthouse Station Gallivan Plaza Station, Courthouse Station, 900 South Station, Ballpark Station, Central Pointe 900 South Station Station, Millcreek Station, Meadowbrook Station, 877 S 200 W, Salt Lake City Murray North Station, Murray Central Station, Fashion Place West Station, Midvale Fort Union
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report & Implementation Plan
    Final Report & Implementation Plan May 2018 Final Report & Implementation Plan | Redwood Road Multimodal Transportation Study PREPARED FOR: Salt Lake City Salt Lake County Sandy City South Jordan City Taylorsville City Utah Department of Transportation Utah Transit Authority Wasatch Front Regional Council West Jordan City West Valley City PREPARED BY: In coordination with: Avenue Consultants Jacques & Associates Leland Consulting Group Redwood Road Multimodal Transportation Study | Final Report & Implementation Plan Contents INTRODUCTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PROJECT NEED 10 CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVES 11 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE 15 IMPLEMENTATION 17 REFERENCES 41 Contents | Page i Final Report & Implementation Plan | Redwood Road Multimodal Transportation Study This page intentionally left blank. Page ii | Contents Redwood Road Multimodal Transportation Study | Final Report & Implementation Plan Introduction The Redwood Road Multimodal Transportation Study build upon such efforts to identify a comprehensive has identified and analyzed options for transportation transportation recommendation from a perspective improvements along Redwood Road, from Salt Lake that would benefit the entire Redwood Road corridor City to South Jordan. The vision of the study is an and balance the needs of all modes. Representatives open, inclusive collaboration that: from each project partner met regularly to provide input on the project needs, existing conditions and • Identifies a unified vision that preserves and completed studies within their jurisdictions, conceptual enhances Redwood Road. solutions, and the Preferred Multimodal Alternative. As • Creates a Preferred Multimodal Alternative that listed in Table 1, on the following page, the steering addresses transit, roadway, bicycles, pedestrians and policy committees met regularly to achieve and land use. concurrence over the course of the project. • Lays a framework for implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Trustees of the Utah Transit Authority
    Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Utah Transit Authority Wednesday, July 22, 2020, 9:00 a.m. Remote Electronic Meeting – No Anchor Location – Live-Stream at https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=utaride NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING CIRCUMSTANCES DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC: In keeping with recommendations of Federal, State, and Local authorities to limit public gatherings in order to control the continuing spread of COVID-19, and in accordance with Utah Governor Gary Herbert’s Executive Order on March 18, 2020 suspending some requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, the UTA Board of Trustees will make the following adjustments to our normal meeting procedures. • All members of the Board of Trustees and meeting presenters will participate electronically via phone or video conference. • Public Comment will not be taken during the meeting but may be submitted through the means listed below. Comments submitted before 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 21st will be distributed to board members prior to the meeting: o online at https://www.rideuta.com/Board-of-Trustees o via email at [email protected] o by telephone at 801-743-3882 option 5 (801-RideUTA option 5) – specify that your comment is for the board meeting. • Meeting proceedings may be viewed remotely through YouTube live-streaming. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=utaride 1. Call to Order & Opening Remarks Chair Carlton Christensen 2. Safety First Minute Sheldon Shaw 3. Consent Chair Carlton Christensen a. Approval of July 15, 2020 Board Meeting Minutes 4. Agency Report Carolyn Gonot 5. August 2020 Change Day Service Plan Approval Mary DeLoretto, Laura Hanson 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 in Review.Cdr
    2011 Year in Review From the General Manger The past year has been momentous for the Utah Transit Authority. With a dedicated and talented team and strong community participation, we marked a year of progress and transformation. We simultaneously opened two new light rail lines ahead of schedule and under budget in August, while increasing system-wide ridership to more than 41 million trips—a six percent increase relative to the previous year. In conjunction with the new TRAX openings, we modified bus services. Community input played a critical role as we planned our bus service transitions. As we plan for the future, the public remains the richest resource for research and needs analyses. We will continue to invite public participation as we prepare the openings of our newest FrontLines 2015 projects. This past year we also renewed our pledge to keep safety our highest priority, as we will every year. We work hard to plan and engineer the safest possible transportation systems. To supplement our engineering, we will continue to do our utmost to educate and enforce measures designed to keep our riders and the public safe. It remains our number-one priority. For example, working with the international organization Operation Lifesaver, UTA team members will be seen throughout our service areas at schools, businesses and community groups talking about how to be safe around trains. We will remember 2011 as an incredible year. With hard work and continued community support, 2012 will be just as transformative and memorable. Michael Allegra General Manager Utah Transit Authority FrontLines 2015 Progress Frontlines 2015 Progress in 2011 UTA continues to make substantial progress on the $2.8 billion FrontLines 2015 project.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAX RED LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    TRAX RED LINE light rail time schedule & line map TRAX Red Line View In Website Mode The light rail line TRAX Red Line has 5 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) To Central Pointe: 11:30 PM (2) To Central Pointe: 6:31 PM - 11:16 PM (3) To Daybreak Parkway: 4:42 AM - 10:50 PM (4) To University: 4:51 AM - 5:06 AM (5) To University Medical: 4:46 AM - 10:16 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest TRAX RED LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next TRAX RED LINE light rail arriving. Direction: To Central Pointe TRAX RED LINE light rail Time Schedule 11 stops To Central Pointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 11:19 PM University Medical Center Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City Tuesday 11:19 PM Fort Douglas Station Wednesday 11:30 PM 200 South Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City Thursday 11:30 PM University South Campus Station Friday 11:30 PM 1790 East South Campus Drive, Salt Lake City Saturday 11:20 PM Stadium Station 1349 East 500 South, Salt Lake City 900 East Station 845 East 400 South, Salt Lake City TRAX RED LINE light rail Info Direction: To Central Pointe Trolley Station Stops: 11 605 E 400 S, Salt Lake City Trip Duration: 26 min Line Summary: University Medical Center, Fort Library Station Douglas Station, University South Campus Station, 217 E 400 S, Salt Lake City Stadium Station, 900 East Station, Trolley Station, Library Station, Courthouse Station, 900 South Courthouse Station Station, Ballpark Station, Central Pointe Station 900 South Station 877 S 200 W, Salt Lake City Ballpark Station 212 W 1300 S, Salt Lake City Central Pointe Station Direction: To Central Pointe TRAX RED LINE light rail Time Schedule 16 stops To Central Pointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 7:36 PM - 8:36 PM Monday 6:11 PM - 10:56 PM Daybreak Parkway Station 11383 S Grandville Ave, South Jordan Tuesday 6:11 PM - 10:56 PM South Jordan Parkway Station Wednesday 6:31 PM - 11:16 PM 5600 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Metropolitan Centers: Evaluating Local Implementation of Regional Plans and Policies NITCN-RR-761 March 2017 NITC is a U.S. Department of Transportation national university transportation center. METROPOLITAN CENTERS: EVALUATING LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF REGIONAL PLANS AND POLICIES Final Report NITCN-RR-761 by Richard D. Margerum Rebecca Lewis Keith Bartholomew Robert G. Parker Stephen Dobrinich University of Oregon University of Utah for National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 March 2017 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. NITCN-RR-761 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Metropolitan Centers: March 2017 Evaluating local implementation of regional plans and policies 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Richard D. Margerum Rebecca Lewis Keith Bartholomew Robert G. Parker Stephen Dobrinich 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Department of PPPM, University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1209 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered National Institute for Transportation and Communities (NITC) 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O. Box 751 Portland, Oregon 97207 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The Denver and Salt Lake City Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) have embarked upon regional visioning strategies that promote development around higher density, mixed use centers with current or future access to transit. This study examines the programs and policies in the Salt Lake City and Denver regions to examine regional vision influence on local planning and the opportunities and constraints facing centers.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    NPSForm 10-900 OMBNo. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. SPP jTfflTTfrHfiiffiffiHfew taj Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x1 in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. historic name Sandy Historic District other name/site number street name roughly bounded by State Street, 9000 South, 700 East & Pioneer Avenue D not for publication city or town Sandy_____________________________________ D vicinity state Utah code UT county Salt Lake code 035 zip code 84070 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ^ nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property E3 meets, D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally n/^atewide ^ Igcallv^D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signatureof certifying official/title Date / * Utah Division of State History.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Transit Authority Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Local Advisory Council REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
    669 West 200 South Utah Transit Authority Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Local Advisory Council REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, June 2, 2021 1:00 PM Frontlines Headquarters NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING CIRCUMSTANCES DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC: In accordance with the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, (Utah Code § 52-4-207.4), the UTA Local Advisory Council will make the following adjustments to our normal meeting procedures. • All members of the Local Advisory Council and meeting presenters will participate electronically. • Meeting proceedings may be viewed remotely through the WebEx meeting platform (see below) or by following the instructions and link on the UTA Board Meetings page - https://www.rideuta.com/Board-of-Trustees/Meetings • Public Comment may be given live during the meeting. See instructions below. o Use this WebEx link and follow the instructions to register for the meeting (you will need to provide your name and email address) https://rideuta.webex.com/rideuta/onstage/g.php?MTID=ed2f6fab6a382e44c85991cd71728f914 o Sign on to the WebEx meeting portal through the “join event” link provided in your email following approval of your registration. o Sign on 5 minutes prior to the meeting start time o Comments are limited to 3 minutes per commenter. • Public Comment may also be given through alternate means. See instructions below. o Comment via email at [email protected] o Comment by telephone at 801-743-3882 option 5 (801-RideUTA option 5) – specify that your comment is for the Local Advisory Council meeting. o Comments submitted before 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 1st will be distributed to council members prior to the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • OPPORTUNITY ZONE - INLAND PORT Foxboro Davis County North North Salt Lake County Salt INDUSTRIAL LAND 16-140 ACRES | SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Lake AB67
    Valentine Estates Cottage Homes AB93 OPPORTUNITY ZONE - INLAND PORT Foxboro Davis County North North Salt Lake County Salt INDUSTRIAL LAND 16-140 ACRES | SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Lake AB67 Mystical LOCATION North of I-80 (exit S River 7200 W), west of Airport SIZE 140 Acres Davis CountyPRICE Salt Lake County $6 per square foot Wasatch Parcel A: 22.54 ac. = $5,891,760.07National G r e a t Parcel B: 16.57 ac. = $4,331,179.51Forest S a l t Parcel C: 33.40 ac. = $8,730,887.58 L a k e Subject Parcel D: $5 per square foot 75.98 LDS Store Storehouse CAPITAL ac.= $16,548,44 Easton Distribution Center AB68 ZONE Industrial SLC Port Salt Lake City Global Logistics International Center, a 7.5 Million Airport Square Foot Development 268 186 Utah School and AB AB Institutional Trust Lands Administration ¨¦§15 ¨¦§80 ¨¦§215 Salt Lake City AB269 AB154 AB270 State St State Lee Kay State Wildlife Center ¤¡89 AB71 South AB201 Salt ¨¦§80 Lake AB172 AB111 Zachary Hartman | [email protected] 6443 North Business Park Loop Road, Suite 12, Park City, Utah 84098 ph. 801.573.9181 | www.landadvisors.com The information contained herein is from sources deemed reliable. We have no reason to doubt its accuracy but do not guarantee it. It is the responsibility of the person reviewing this information to independently verify it. This package is subject to change, prior sale or complete withdrawal. UTSaltLake192642 - 12.19.19 PROPERTY DETAIL MAP Zachary Hartman | 801.573.9181 | www.landadvisors.com Parcel D 75.98 acres Parcel A 22.54 acres 1700 N New State Prison Under Construction Parcel B 16.57 SLC Road acres 8000W 1400 N Parcel C 33.40 acres HaulRoad 7200W 7600W UDOTRoad 1200 N Legend Future Roads K 0 500 1,000 8400W Feet 192642-33764 02-13-19 While Land Advisors Organization® makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information, there is no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of furnished data.
    [Show full text]
  • Route F590-9000 South Flex F590
    For Information Call 801-RIDE-UTA (801-743-3882) outside Salt Lake County 888-RIDE-UTA (888-743-3882) Route F590-9000 South Flex www.rideuta.com F590 HOW TO USE THIS SCHEDULE Determine your timepoint based on when you want to 9000 South Flex leave or when you want to arrive. Read across for your destination and down for your time and direction of travel. Jordan Valley Station A route map is provided to help you relate to the Rt. 232, 240, Red line 27 T -Route Transfer point timepoints shown. Weekday, Saturday & Sunday schedules 00 W differ from one another. Historic Sandy Sandy Pk R Station UTA SERVICE DIRECTORY Jordan edw T Rt. F94, Blue line Ÿ General Information, Schedules, Trip Planning and Valley Stat ood R Customer Feedback: 801-RIDE-UTA (801-743-3882) Hospital e St wy Ÿ Outside Salt Lake County call 888-RIDE-UTA (888-743- d T 9000 S 9000 S T 8960 S 3882) T 300 E T Rt. 525 Rt. 201 Ÿ Fairchild Rt. 218 For 24 hour automated service for next bus available use option 1. Have stop number and 3 digit route Bangert Semiconductor SLCC I- number (use 0 or 00 if number is not 3 digits). Jordan Campus 15 Ÿ Pass By Mail Information 801-262-5626 er Hwy Ÿ For Employment information please visit http://www.rideuta.com/careers/ Ÿ Travel Training 801-287-2275 LOST AND FOUND 9000 S Weber/South Davis: 801-626-1207 option 3 Wights F *The bus could deviate within the shaded area up to 2 deviations per trip.
    [Show full text]