DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Utah Bicycle Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Utah Bicycle Master Plan 2011 University of Utah Bicycle Master Plan PREPARED BY: Alta Planning + Design and Psomas PREPARED FOR: University of Utah Facilities Department Cory Higgins Director for Plant Operations John McNary Director for Campus Design & Construction Michael G. Perez Associate Vice President for Facilities Management Gordon Wilson Assistant Vice President for Auxiliary Services Alma Allred Director for Commuter Services Tami Cleveland Project Manager - Campus Planner Joseph Harman Campus Design & Construction Manager Chad Larsen Commuter Services Bicycle Manager Ray Wheeler Assoc. Director for Space Planning and Management Myron Willson Director for Office of Sustainability Robert Miles Utah Department of Transportation - Region 2 Tom Millar Mayor's Bicycle Advisory Committee Chad Mullins Salt Lake County Bicycle Advisory Committee Lisa Pascadlo - Detective Salt Lake City Police - Bicycle Liaison Becka Roolf Salt Lake City Transportation Julianne Sabula UTA - Engineering and Construction Planner Lynette Seebohm University of Utah Health Care - Asst. V.P. Garth Smith University of Utah Police Department Steve Panish University of Utah Health Sciences – Asst. V.P. Charles Evans Director for Research Park This Page Intentionally Left Blank 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Goals & Objectives......................................................................................................................................... 3 3 Summary of Existing Plans and Studies.................................................................................................... 7 3.1 University of Utah Campus Master Plan ........................................................................................................... 7 3.2 University of Utah Design Standards ................................................................................................................. 8 3.3 Salt Lake City Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan (2004) .............................................................................. 8 3.4 Bicycle Initiatives at the University of Utah (1992) ........................................................................................ 9 3.5 Utah Department of Transportation Pedestrian & Bicycle Guide (2008) ................................................. 9 3.6 Foothill Drive Corridor Study (2008) ............................................................................................................... 10 3.7 University Policy 3-232: ....................................................................................................................................... 10 3.8 Climate Action Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 10 4 Summary of Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................. 13 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 4.2 Existing Bicycle Network .................................................................................................................................... 13 4.3 Bicycle Parking & Utilization............................................................................................................................. 21 4.4 Multi-Modal Connections ................................................................................................................................... 25 4.5 Bicycle Crashes & Safety...................................................................................................................................... 25 4.6 Existing Bicycle Education & Programs .......................................................................................................... 31 4.7 Bicycle Counts ........................................................................................................................................................ 32 4.8 Opportunities & Constraints ............................................................................................................................. 33 5 Needs Analysis .............................................................................................................................................. 41 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 41 5.2 Needs & Types of Bicyclists ................................................................................................................................ 41 5.3 Master Plan Open House – May 2011 ............................................................................................................... 42 5.4 Master Plan Open House – August 2011 ........................................................................................................... 43 5.5 Public Comments & Feedback .......................................................................................................................... 44 5.6 Campus Bicycle Tour ............................................................................................................................................ 47 5.7 Demand & Benefits Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 50 6 Infrastructure Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 55 6.1 Bikeways .................................................................................................................................................................. 55 6.2 Support Facilities ................................................................................................................................................... 72 6.3 Wayfinding and Signage ...................................................................................................................................... 77 6.4 Bicycles and Transit .............................................................................................................................................. 81 7 Non-Infrastructure Strategies ................................................................................................................... 87 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 87 7.2 Guiding Principles ................................................................................................................................................ 90 7.3 Recommended Programs ..................................................................................................................................... 92 8 Implementation .......................................................................................................................................... 105 8.1 Cost Estimates ...................................................................................................................................................... 105 8.2 Project Prioritization Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 106 8.3 Project Summary Tables ..................................................................................................................................... 107 8.4 Funding ................................................................................................................................................................... 121 Figure 4.1: Unpaved Shared-Use Trail ................................................................................................................................. 14 Figure 4.2: Shared-Use Path ................................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 4.3: Bike Path ................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 4.4: Bike Lanes .............................................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 4.5: Bike Route ............................................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 5.1: Bicyclist Types by Overall Population ............................................................................................................. 42 Figure 6.1: Short-Term Bike Parking Installation Guidelines.......................................................................................... 73 Figure 6.2: Possible Bicycle Trough Retrofit Design ......................................................................................................... 76 Figure 6.3: Conceptual Wayfinding Sign System ............................................................................................................... 79 Figure 6.4: Wayfinding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Frederick P. Champ Papers, 1896-1976
    Frederick P. Champ papers, 1896-1976 Overview of the Collection Creator Champ, Frederick P. (Frederick Percival), 1896-1976 Title Frederick P. Champ papers Dates 1896-1976 (inclusive) 18961976 Quantity 375 boxes, (182.25 linear ft.) Collection Number USU_COLL MSS 50 Summary Family and business correspondence, business records, and investment reports. Much of business correspondence concerns the Utah Mortgage Loan Corp.; significant personal correspondents include the Champ family, George D. Preston and family, J. Wylie Brown, and several politicians in the western U.S. Also includes materials from Champ's many organizational memberships, including the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Mortgage Bankers Association of America, Logan Chamber of Commerce, Logan Rotary Club, and the Cache Valley Council of the Boy Scouts of America. Repository Utah State University, Merrill-Cazier Library, Special Collections and Archives Division Special Collections and Archives Merrill-Cazier Library Utah State University Logan, UT 84322-3000 Telephone: 435-797-2663 Fax: 435-797-2880 [email protected] Access Restrictions Restrictions No restrictions on use, except: not available through interlibrary loan. Languages English Sponsor Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) grant, 2007-2008 Biographical Note Frederick Percival Champ was born June 4, 1896, in Salt Lake City, a son of George Herbert and Alla Dora Cochran Champ. He attended the New Jersey Academy, Utah State Agricultural College (now Utah State University) in Logan, St. Stephens School in Colorado Springs, and Harvard University. He was awarded an honorary Doctor of Laws degree by Utah State University in 1954. Mr. Champ married Frances Elizabeth Winton in Duluth, Minnesota on December 29, 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2023 TIP Project Table Listing
    2018 – 202 3 Tra nspo rtation Improvement Program (TIP) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) 2018-2023 PR OJECTS For the WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL COUNCIL (WFRC) AREA Including a separate listing of the following programs Urban Surface Transportation Program (STP), Congestion Mitigation/ Air Quality Program (CMAQ), Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Other Federal Highway Federal Transit Administration Funds State Funds Administration Funds National Highway Performance Sec. 5303 – MPO & Statewide Planning Interstate Maintenance (IM) Sec. 5307 – Urbanized Area Formula National Highway System (NHS) Bridge On State System State Construction Sec. 5309 – Capital Investment Program Bridge Replace ment Off Centenn ial Highway Funds – New Starts System – Local Critical Highway Need Funds Sec. 5309 – Capital Investment Program Off System – Op ti on al Highway Cons tructi on - – Bus Minimum Guarantee Program Sec. 5309 – Capital Investment –Fixed Highway Safety Improvement State General Funds Guide-way Modernization Safety Any Area State Traffic Corr idor - Sect. 5310 – Elderly Persons and Rail/ Highway Crossing – Preservati on Persons with Disabilities Hazard Elimination Transportation Inv estment Sec. 5320 – Transit in Parks Program Rec reati on al Trail s Program - Fund (TIF) Safe Routes to Schoo l STP - Any Area Statewide Sec. 5337 – State of Good Repair TIGER Discretionary Funds Other Federal Funds Sec. 5339 – Buses and Bus Facilities Section includes; • Glossary of Federal Funding Types • Projects included in the 2018-2023 Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • HOLD the DATE on a Homeowners Or Renter’S Insurance Policy
    46 .32 .791 301 40 217 MD wn, ersto Hag t, Stree tomac Po N. 6 R ENTE C E M O LC E W R ISITO V N W NTO W O Bike Routes D .com ries emo ndm ryla .ma www Hub City Bike Loop k State Highway/Existing Bike Route Par ls Existing Bike Lane Mil HUB CITY BIKE LOOP Existing Multi-Use Path about bi about town? Hagers in ing cycl 7 x125 7 857 01.739. 3 LL ONS STI CA QUE 1740 2 MD wn, ersto Hag t tree S in nkl Fra E. One 210 Room Hall, y Suggested Bike Friendly Route Cit org ownmd. erst .hag www Points of Interest 1 Hagerstown–Washington County Convention & Visitors Bureau Scan here to watch a video of the Hub City Bike Loop. 2 Hagerstown Police Department The 10-mile loop around the City starts and ends in au ure B s itor Vis nd a ion ent onv C unty Co ton hing Was wn- sto 3 Washington County Bus Transfer Center Fairgrounds Park and uses Hager the the y, b rt pa in and, own rst Hage of City he t by red both on-street bike lanes Sponso 4 Discovery Station and multi-use paths. 5 University Systems of Maryland–Hagerstown s bert Gys 6 Barbara Ingram School for the Arts David —Mayor 7 Farmer’s Market own! rst age H d oun ar des ri afe s of es mil many you ish 8 Pangborn Park w I n. stow 9 Fairgrounds Park and Hager ve ut ut ugho hro t s ack r e bik ic publ more g lin instal e Hagerstown Ice & Sports Complex ry A ar we ng, rki pa ike b to access ease incr to y, ll iona Addit y.
    [Show full text]
  • Owner's Manual
    OWNER’S MANUAL OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITY Consult last page of manual for Warranty Registration This manual contains important information regarding the safe operation and maintenance of your bicycle. Read all sections and appendices before you ride your new bicycle, and carefully follow the instructions. Instructions preceded by the words NOTE, CAUTION, or WARNING are of special significance. NOTE: Instructions which are of special interest. CAUTION: Indicates a potentially hazardous situation which, if not avoided, may result in minor or moderate injury, or is an alert against unsafe practices. WARNING: Indicates a potentially hazardous situation which, if not avoided, could result in serious injury or death. THEFT AND WARRANTY INFORMATION • Record all numbers shown on the bicycle. • Be sure to fill out warranty information online (or mail in if you do not have access to a computer). NOTE: The serial number is not on record where your bicycle was sold or manufactured, you must register it. Keep the following information along with a copy of your sales receipt. Serial Number: Model Name: Store Purchased From: Purchase Date: Color: Size: • Lock your bicycle securely whenever it is out of your sight. • Also, carefully follow the instructions in any additional literature supplied with the bicycle. WARNING: Before your first ride, check the brakes and all cam action retention devices. Service, if necessary, is described in the maintenance section of this manual. • Register your bicycle with your local law enforcement agency & National Bike Registry. • Report any theft immediately. • Add your bicycle to your homeowner’s or apartment insurance policy. Serial Number Locations WARNING: MUST READ BEFORE RIDING • Obtain, read, and follow Owner’s Manual.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Total Artificial Heart
    The First Total Artificial Heart On the night of December 1-2, 1982, with a major winter storm howling outside, medical history was being made inside the University of Utah Hospital. This event was the implantation of the first destination total artificial heart (TAH) in a human being. That person, 61-year-old Barney Clark, was a retired Seattle dentist with family roots in Utah. Dr. Clark’s several year history of dyspnea and fatigability had been attributed to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a University of Utah Hospital former smoker. However, 2 1/2 years before admission, a diagnosis of heart failure was made associated with atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response. In-patient treatment for recurrent heart failure with paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia (VT) was required 1 ½ years before admission. Coronary angiography and left ventriculography established a diagnosis of advanced, non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with an ejection fraction of 23%. Because of symptomatic progression of heart failure, Dr. Clark was referred to the author at LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City, near family members, for investigational inotrope therapy (amrinone), but this caused hypotension and exacerbated atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Endomyocardial biopsy showed low-grade cellular and humoral myocarditis, and a course of immunosuppressant therapy (prednisone and azathioprine) was begun with initial improvement. However, clinical deterioration resumed, with low- output failure and edema, 6 ½ months later, leading to hospitalization for IV diuretics and dobutamine. Clinical improvement was only marginal, leaving him in class IV heart failure. Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD: Barney Clark’s Cardiologist An opportune meeting occurred 3-4 months prior to the final admission between the author and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • City-Bike Maintenance and Availability
    Project Number: 44-JSD-DPC3 City-Bike Maintenance and Availability An Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By Michael DiDonato Stephen Herbert Disha Vachhani Date: May 6, 2002 Professor James Demetry, Advisor Abstract This report analyzes the Copenhagen City-Bike Program and addresses the availability problems. We depict the inner workings of the program and its problems, focusing on possible causes. We include analyses of public bicycle systems throughout the world and the design rationale behind them. Our report also examines the technology underlying “smart-bike” systems, comparing the advantages and costs relative to coin deposit bikes. We conclude with recommendations on possible allocation of the City Bike Foundation’s resources to increase the quality of service to the community, while improving the publicity received by the city of Copenhagen. 1 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following for making this project successful. First, we thank WPI and the Interdisciplinary and Global Studies Division for providing off- campus project sites. By organizing this Copenhagen project, Tom Thomsen and Peder Pedersen provided us with unique personal experiences of culture and local customs. Our advisor, James Demetry, helped us considerably throughout the project. His suggestions gave us the motivation and encouragement to make this project successful and enjoyable. We thank Kent Ljungquist for guiding us through the preliminary research and proposal processes and Paul Davis who, during a weekly visit, gave us a new perspective on our objectives. We appreciate all the help that our liaison, Jens Pedersen, and the Danish Cyclist Federation provided for us during our eight weeks in Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinance No. 3418 an Ordinance Amending The
    ORDINANCE NO. 3418 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, OKLAHOMA, CHAPTER 29, TITLED “MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC” BY AMENDING ARTICLE I, “IN GENERAL,” SECTION 29-1, “DEFINITIONS,” BY REVISING THE DEFINITION OF “BICYCLE, ELECTRIC-ASSISTED BICYCLE AND MOTORIZED BICYCLE,” ADDING NEW DEFINITIONS FOR THE TERMS “MOPED,” “MOTOR SCOOTER OR MOTORIZED SCOOTER,” AND “MOTOR-DRIVEN CYCLE”; AMENDING ARTICLE VII “BICYCLES AND MOTORIZED SCOOTERS, BY RENAMING IT “BICYCLES AND NON-LICENSED ELECTRIC AND MOTORIZED PERSONAL CONVEYANCES”; AMENDING SECTION 29-201, GENERALLY AND SECTION 29-211 RIDING ON SIDEWALKS; AMENDING ARTICLE VIII “MOTORCYCLES AND MOTOR SCOOTERS” BY RENAMING IT “MOTORCYCLES, MOTOR-DRIVEN CYCLES, AND MOPEDS”; AMENDING SECTION 29-222, REQUIRED EQUIPMENT; AMENDING SECTION 29-223, CLINGING TO VEHICLES, DELETING SECTION 29-224, HANLDEBARS; AMENDING SECTION 29-225 PASSING BETWEEN LANES; AMENDING SECTION 29-226 RIDING ON SIDEWALKS; AMENDING SECTION 29-227, HEADGEAR; DELETING SECTION 29-228 RESTRICTION ON TIME OF OPERATION; AND AMENDING SECTION 29-229 SPECIAL SPEED LIMITATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, OKLAHOMA: Section 1. That Stillwater City Code, Chapter29, titled “Motor Vehicles and Traffic,” Article I, “In General,” Section 29-1, “Definitions,” be and the same is now amended to read as follows: ARTICLE I. - IN GENERAL Sec. 29-1. - Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, or as more recently defined in Title 47, Oklahoma Statutes, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Authorized emergency vehicles, equipment means: (1) When equipped as prescribed in subsection (2) of this definition: a.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Year in Review from the General Manger
    2010 Year in Review From the General Manger UTA marked its 40th anniversary in 2010. I am honored to have been part of UTA for more than 30 of those years. I remember when we were a small, 67-bus operation with one garage. Now we are a vibrant, multimodal transit system serving six counties with 118 bus routes, 20 miles of TRAX light rail lines and 44 miles of FrontRunner commuter rail. Despite the current economic challenges, I have never been more excited about our future. We're working hard to place a major transit stop within reach of every resident in the counties we serve. We are even closer to that goal with the FrontLines 2015 program, which will add 25 miles of light rail in Salt Lake County and 45 miles of FrontRunner commuter rail in Salt Lake and Utah counties. In 2010 we completed more than half of the FrontLines 2015 program and announced the openings of the Mid-Jordan and West Valley TRAX lines for summer 2011. We're on track to complete the rest of the lines in this massive project by 2015, as promised. None of these major projects would be possible without the support of community members along the Wasatch Front. So as we celebrate 40 years of service, remember our best years are yet to come. Warm Regards, Michael Allegra General Manager Utah Transit Authority 2010 Progress Frontlines 2015 Progress in 2010 FrontLines 2015 Progress UTA has been busy constructing the largest transit Line Percent Complete project in its history—the $2.8 billion FrontLines 2015 FrontRunner South 74 project—making significant progress in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 in Review.Cdr
    2011 Year in Review From the General Manger The past year has been momentous for the Utah Transit Authority. With a dedicated and talented team and strong community participation, we marked a year of progress and transformation. We simultaneously opened two new light rail lines ahead of schedule and under budget in August, while increasing system-wide ridership to more than 41 million trips—a six percent increase relative to the previous year. In conjunction with the new TRAX openings, we modified bus services. Community input played a critical role as we planned our bus service transitions. As we plan for the future, the public remains the richest resource for research and needs analyses. We will continue to invite public participation as we prepare the openings of our newest FrontLines 2015 projects. This past year we also renewed our pledge to keep safety our highest priority, as we will every year. We work hard to plan and engineer the safest possible transportation systems. To supplement our engineering, we will continue to do our utmost to educate and enforce measures designed to keep our riders and the public safe. It remains our number-one priority. For example, working with the international organization Operation Lifesaver, UTA team members will be seen throughout our service areas at schools, businesses and community groups talking about how to be safe around trains. We will remember 2011 as an incredible year. With hard work and continued community support, 2012 will be just as transformative and memorable. Michael Allegra General Manager Utah Transit Authority FrontLines 2015 Progress Frontlines 2015 Progress in 2011 UTA continues to make substantial progress on the $2.8 billion FrontLines 2015 project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin the MILEPOSTS of THE
    ERA BULLETIN — JANUARY, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 1 January, 2017 The Bulletin THE MILEPOSTS OF THE Published by the Electric NEW YORK SUBWAY SYSTEM Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box by ERIC R. OSZUSTOWICZ 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. Many of us are familiar with the chaining three former divisions (plus the Flushing and system for the tracks of the New York sub- Canarsie Lines) had one zero point. Most of For general inquiries, or way system. Each track on the system has a these signs have been removed due to vari- Bulletin submissions, marker every 50 feet based on a “zero point” ous construction projects over the years and contact us at bulletin@ for that particular track. For example, the ze- were never replaced. Their original purpose erausa.org. ERA’s ro point for the BMT Broadway Subway is is unknown, but shortly after their installation, website is just north of 57th Street-Seventh Avenue. The they quickly fell into disuse. www.erausa.org. southbound local track is Track A1. 500 feet Over the years, I have been recording and Editorial Staff: south of the zero point, the marker is photographing the locations of the remaining Editor-in-Chief: A1/5+00. One hundred fifty feet further south, mileposts before they all disappear com- Bernard Linder the marker is A1/6+50. If you follow the line pletely. These locations were placed on a Tri-State News and all the way to 14th Street-Union Square, one spreadsheet. Using track schematics show- Commuter Rail Editor: Ronald Yee will find a marker reading A1/120+00 within ing exact distances, I was able to deduce the North American and World the station.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle Master Plan
    Bicycle Master Plan City of Moreno Valley November 2014 Acknowledgements This Bicycle Master Plan was prepared for the City of Moreno Valley under the guidance of: Senior Engineer/Project Manager Michael Lloyd, P.E. City Traffic Engineer Eric Lewis, P.E., T.E. Additional input was provided by participants at three community workshops and respon- dents via the project online survey. Prepared by KTU+A Planning + Landscape Architecture Principal Mike Singleton, AICP-CTP, ASLA, LEED AP P roject Manager/Planner John Holloway, ASLA, LEED Green Associate, LCI M obility Planners Joe Punsalan, GISP, PTP, LCI Alison Moss Facility planning and transportation engineering support provided by IBI Group Inc. Associate/Transportation Planner Bill Delo, AICP Transportation Planner Matt Redmond This project was funded by a California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Community Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant. Table of Contents City of Moreno Valley • Bicycle Master Plan Executive Summary iii 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope 2 1.2 Study Area 2 1.3 Benefits of Cycling 4 1.4 Methodology 6 1.5 Bicycle Facility Types 7 1.6 Bicycle Facility State of Practice 16 1.7 Applicable Legislation 18 2 Existing Conditions and Analysis 2.1 Existing Plans 21 2.2 Existing Facilities and Programs 26 2.3 Trip Origins and Destinations 28 2.4 Transit Connections 34 2.5 Safety Analysis 39 2.6 Opportunities and Constraints Summary 47 3 Recommendations 3.1 Recommended Goals, Policies and Objectives 53 3.2 Recommended Facilities 54 3.3 Future Opportunities 71 3.4 Improvements
    [Show full text]
  • Utah's 2011-2040 Unified Transportation Plan
    2011 - 2040 udot.utah.gov 131949.indd 1 7/31/13 2:23 PM UTah’S UNifieD PLaN ParTNerS CaChe MPO 179 North Main, Suite 305 Logan, UT 84321 (435) 716-7154 www.cachempo.org Dixie MPO 1070 West 1600 South, Bldg. B St. George, UT 84770 (435) 673-3548 www.dixiempo.org MOUNTaiNLaND aSSOCiaTiON Of GOverNMeNTS 586 east 800 North Orem, UT 84097 (801) 229-3800 www.mountainland.org UTah DeParTMeNT Of TraNSPOrTaTiON Systems Planning and Programming 4501 South 2700 West – Box 143600 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 (801) 965-4129 www.udot.utah.gov UTah TraNSiT aUThOriTy 669 West 200 South Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (801) 262-5626 www.rideuta.com WaSaTCh frONT reGiONaL COUNCiL 295 North Jimmy Doolittle road Salt Lake City, UT 84116 (801) 363-4250 www.wfrc.org 131949.indd 2 7/31/13 2:23 PM TaBLe Of CONTeNTS introduction 2 - Letter from the Chairs of the Utah Transportation Commission and Utah’s Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) - Letter from the Directors of the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and Utah’s MPOs - Purpose of Unified Transportation Planning UDOT’s Long range Plan 8 Utah MPO Long range Plans 12 - Wasatch Choices 2040 (Weber, Davis, Salt Lake and Utah Counties) - envision Cache valley (Cache County) - vision Dixie (Washington County) Utah’s Population Growth Challenge 16 Utah’s Project Planning & funding Process 20 - Project Development Process - Utah’s Transportation Needs and Preferences - financial Plan and assumptions - Continuous, Cooperative and Comprehensive Planning highway Projects by region 34 regionally important Transportation Projects 34 Utah highway Projects Map 35 highway Projects Phase One (2011-2020) 36- 41 highway Projects Phase Two (2021-2030) 42-46 highway Projects Phase Three (2031-2040) 47-50 highway Projects Unfunded 51 -52 Cache valley highway Projects Map 53 Wasatch front Ogden/Layton area highway Projects Map 54 Wasatch front Salt Lake valley highway Projects Map 55 Utah valley area highway Projects Map 56 Dixie area highway Projects Map 57 Transit Projects by region 58 Transit Projects Phase One (2011-2020) 59.
    [Show full text]