BRIGHAM CITY TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY Prepared for the Utah Transit Authority and Brigham City Corporation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BRIGHAM CITY TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY Prepared for the Utah Transit Authority and Brigham City Corporation BRIGHAM CITY TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY Prepared for the Utah Transit Authority and Brigham City Corporation Final Report November 2007. Project Number 060158 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................1 Introduction.................................................................................................1 Process ......................................................................................................1 Study Area Characteristics .........................................................................2 Purpose and Need......................................................................................4 Corridor Analysis ........................................................................................4 Modal Analysis ...........................................................................................6 Station Planning .........................................................................................7 Recommendations......................................................................................8 Chapter One: Process........................................................................1 Committees ................................................................................................2 Management Group ............................................................................................... 2 Study Team............................................................................................................ 2 Policy Group........................................................................................................... 2 Stakeholder Group................................................................................................. 2 Committee Membership......................................................................................... 3 Public Involvement .....................................................................................3 Policy Group Meeting............................................................................................. 4 Stakeholder Group Meetings ................................................................................. 4 Open House........................................................................................................... 4 Agency Involvement ...................................................................................4 Other Relevant Plan Documents ................................................................5 Chapter Two: Study Area Characteristics ..........................................7 Study Area..................................................................................................7 Land Use ....................................................................................................7 General Plan .......................................................................................................... 8 Demographics ............................................................................................8 Population .............................................................................................................. 8 Employment ......................................................................................................... 10 Transportation Facilities ...........................................................................12 Highway ............................................................................................................... 13 Transit .................................................................................................................. 13 Rail ....................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter Three: Travel Pattern Analysis...........................................17 Work Trip Travel Demand ........................................................................17 Work Trip Mode Share .............................................................................21 Base Year Transit Ridership.....................................................................23 Travel Time...............................................................................................24 Chapter Four: Purpose & Need........................................................25 Reduce Auto Dependency........................................................................25 Provide High-Quality Transportation Options ...........................................28 Promote Economic Development .............................................................30 Chapter Five: Corridor Analysis .......................................................33 US-89, Brigham City to Pleasant View .....................................................33 Transit .................................................................................................................. 34 Pedestrian/Bike Facilities..................................................................................... 35 Existing & Future Traffic....................................................................................... 35 Future Travel Time/Access Management............................................................ 35 Dedicated Transit Lane........................................................................................ 37 Cost...................................................................................................................... 37 I-15, Brigham City to Pleasant View .........................................................37 Transit .................................................................................................................. 38 Existing & Future Traffic....................................................................................... 38 Planned Improvements ........................................................................................ 39 Dedicated Transit Lane........................................................................................ 39 Union Pacific Railroad ..............................................................................40 Line Capacity ....................................................................................................... 40 Passenger Trains................................................................................................. 40 Freight Constraints............................................................................................... 41 Costs .................................................................................................................... 41 Chapter Six: Modal Analysis ............................................................43 Screened Alternatives ..............................................................................43 Light Rail Transit .................................................................................................. 43 Monorail ............................................................................................................... 44 Trolleys/Streetcars ............................................................................................... 44 Existing Local and Express Bus Service ............................................................. 44 Analyzed Alternatives ...............................................................................45 Option 1: Improved Bus Service ......................................................................... 45 Option 2: Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ..................................................................... 48 Option 3: Commuter Rail Transit ........................................................................ 50 Analysis Summary....................................................................................52 Chapter Seven: Station Area Planning ............................................57 Existing Conditions and Analysis..............................................................57 Interview 1............................................................................................................ 58 Interview 2............................................................................................................ 59 Forest Street Site Visit ......................................................................................... 59 Preliminary Analysis............................................................................................. 60 Forest Street Preliminary Design Concepts..............................................62 Preliminary Concept A: ........................................................................................ 62 Train/Bus Station on South Side of Forest Street................................................ 62 Preliminary Concept B: ........................................................................................ 63 Train/Bus Station on North Side of Forest Street ................................................ 63 Preliminary Concept C: ........................................................................................ 64 Bus Station on North Side of Forest Street.......................................................... 64 Forest Street Detailed Design Concepts ..................................................64 Detailed Design Concept A:................................................................................. 65 Bus Station on Forest Street...............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • 2018-2023 TIP Project Table Listing
    2018 – 202 3 Tra nspo rtation Improvement Program (TIP) TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) 2018-2023 PR OJECTS For the WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL COUNCIL (WFRC) AREA Including a separate listing of the following programs Urban Surface Transportation Program (STP), Congestion Mitigation/ Air Quality Program (CMAQ), Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Other Federal Highway Federal Transit Administration Funds State Funds Administration Funds National Highway Performance Sec. 5303 – MPO & Statewide Planning Interstate Maintenance (IM) Sec. 5307 – Urbanized Area Formula National Highway System (NHS) Bridge On State System State Construction Sec. 5309 – Capital Investment Program Bridge Replace ment Off Centenn ial Highway Funds – New Starts System – Local Critical Highway Need Funds Sec. 5309 – Capital Investment Program Off System – Op ti on al Highway Cons tructi on - – Bus Minimum Guarantee Program Sec. 5309 – Capital Investment –Fixed Highway Safety Improvement State General Funds Guide-way Modernization Safety Any Area State Traffic Corr idor - Sect. 5310 – Elderly Persons and Rail/ Highway Crossing – Preservati on Persons with Disabilities Hazard Elimination Transportation Inv estment Sec. 5320 – Transit in Parks Program Rec reati on al Trail s Program - Fund (TIF) Safe Routes to Schoo l STP - Any Area Statewide Sec. 5337 – State of Good Repair TIGER Discretionary Funds Other Federal Funds Sec. 5339 – Buses and Bus Facilities Section includes; • Glossary of Federal Funding Types • Projects included in the 2018-2023 Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Glovers Interchange Design Selection
    Technical Memorandum 23: Glovers Interchange Design Selection in support of the Environmental Impact Statement West Davis Corridor Project Federal Highway Administration Utah Department of Transportation UDOT Project No. S-0067(14)0 Prepared by Horrocks Engineers 2162 W. Grove Parkway Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 November 2016 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................................... 2 2.1 Design Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Design Variables ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Concept Development ................................................................................................................ 3 3.0 CONCEPTS SELECTED FOR COMPARISON ................................................................. 4 3.1 Northbound Concepts ................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Southbound Concepts ................................................................................................................ 5 4.0 CONCEPT COMPARISON ............................................................................................. 5 4.1 Level of Service Pre-screening Evaluation ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Farmington Active Transportation Plan Connecting Our Community Through Safe Walking & Bicycling
    Farmington Active Transportation Plan Connecting Our Community Through Safe Walking & Bicycling MARCH 2016 This Plan was prepared for Farmington City by Alta Planning + Design and Ensign Engineering, with funding and planning assistance from the Wasatch Front Regional Council. PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE & CONSULTANT TEAM: FARMINGTON RESIDENTS, BUSINESS OWNERS Amy Shumway, Farmington Trails Committee Jeff Hepworth, Owner, Loyal Cycle Co. Table of Contents Chad Stone 1: Introduction . 1 About the Plan .....................................................................1 Why Walking & Bicycling? .................................................1 FARMINGTON CITY Eric Anderson, Project Manager & Associate Planner Local Walking & Bicycling Trends ...................................4 David Petersen, Community Development Director National Walking & Bicycling Trends .............................6 Connectivity To Transit ......................................................6 FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL Existing Plans & Studies ....................................................8 Doug Anderson, Councilmember Existing Codes & Policies ................................................13 Existing Programs & Events ...........................................15 2: Public Involvement . 17 KAYSVILLE RESIDENTS, BUSINESS OWNERS Zach Chatelain, Owner, Biker’s Edge Field Investigation Bike Ride ..........................................17 Brady Edwards, Owners, Bountiful Bicycle Interactive Online Mapping Tool ..................................17 Russell Lindberg,
    [Show full text]
  • The Davis 15 Sports 38 Classifieds Home & Garden Hints and Tips to Help You Make Your Garden Ready for Spring Clipperthursday, April 5, 2018 Vol
    7 Opinion 32 Life 12 Showcase 33 Calendar THE DAVIS 15 Sports 38 Classifieds Home & Garden Hints and tips to help you make your garden ready for spring CLIPPERTHURSDAY, APRIL 5, 2018 VOL. 126 NO. 32 New LDS temple announced for Layton by Jenniffer WARDELL everyone watching from home was. In Layton, however, that’s not as [email protected] “We found out last week, when telling as it might be in other cities. a church representative came up The LDS church has a real-estate LAYTON - Davis County is and talked to a couple of us,” said arm in Layton City that deals with getting a new temple. Layton City Mayor Bob Stevenson. various properties, including the In the closing session of LDS “They swore us to secrecy.” Layton Mission, the Layton Family General Conference last Sunday, He said that he doesn’t feel History Center, and some farms. President Russell M. Nelson of comfortable offering any insight “There’s a lot of church prop- The Church of Jesus Christ of as to where the temple might be erty in Layton,” he said. Latter-day Saints announced that located or any idea of the specific Stevenson added that represen- the church will build a temple in timeline for construction. tatives regularly request meetings Layton City. Once it’s completed, it “It’s not our place to be able to with the city to discuss the buying will be the church’s 19th temple in (announce things like) that,” said and selling of property. COURTESY Utah. Stevenson, though he was willing “When they first requested this PRESIDENT RUSSELL M.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared for the Utah Department of Transportation and the Wasatch Front Regional Council
    NORTH LEGACY TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR SUPPLEMENTAL STUDY Prepared for the Utah Department of Transportation and the Wasatch Front Regional Council October 2009 North Legacy Transportation Corridor Supplemental Study Prepared for the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and the Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) Prepared by InterPlan Co. In cooperation with Wilkinson Ferrari & Company and HDR Engineering, Inc. Vern Keeslar InterPlan Thomas McMurtry InterPlan Matt Riffkin InterPlan Dana Holmes HDR Susan Lee HDR Mimi Charles Wilkinson Ferrari & Company Bethany Matsumori Wilkinson Ferrari & Company Amy Steinbrech Wilkinson Ferrari & Company October 2009 Table of Contents Executive Summary .....................................................................................1 Summary of Study Purpose.................................................................................. 1 North Legacy Draft Purpose and Need................................................................. 1 North Legacy Alignment to be Preserved ............................................................. 2 Chapter 1 Introduction..................................................................................5 Study Overview .................................................................................................... 5 Benefits and Principles of Corridor Preservation .................................................. 6 Benefits......................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Comments and Responses for the Final EIS
    Comments and Responses for the Final EIS in support of the Environmental Impact Statement West Davis Corridor Project Federal Highway Administration Utah Department of Transportation in cooperation with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Utah Reclamation, Mitigation, and Conservation Commission Project No. F-0067(14)0 Prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc. 2825 E. Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, UT 84121-7077 September 29, 2017 This page is intentionally blank. Contents 1.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Chapter 1 – Purpose of and Need for Action ............................................................................. 3 1.1.1 Section 1.2 – Description of the Needs Assessment Study Area ................................. 3 1.1.2 Section 1.4 – Summary of Purpose and Need.............................................................. 5 1.2 Chapter 2 – Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 7 1.2.1 Section 2.1 – Background of the Alternatives-Development Process ......................... 7 1.2.2 Section 2.2 – Alternatives-Development Process for the Final EIS ............................ 7 1.2.3 Section 2.3 – WDC Roadway Design Elements ........................................................ 20 1.2.4 Section 2.4 – Description of Alternatives Carried Forward for Detailed Study .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Utah's 2011-2040 Unified Transportation Plan
    2011 - 2040 udot.utah.gov 131949.indd 1 7/31/13 2:23 PM UTah’S UNifieD PLaN ParTNerS CaChe MPO 179 North Main, Suite 305 Logan, UT 84321 (435) 716-7154 www.cachempo.org Dixie MPO 1070 West 1600 South, Bldg. B St. George, UT 84770 (435) 673-3548 www.dixiempo.org MOUNTaiNLaND aSSOCiaTiON Of GOverNMeNTS 586 east 800 North Orem, UT 84097 (801) 229-3800 www.mountainland.org UTah DeParTMeNT Of TraNSPOrTaTiON Systems Planning and Programming 4501 South 2700 West – Box 143600 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 (801) 965-4129 www.udot.utah.gov UTah TraNSiT aUThOriTy 669 West 200 South Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (801) 262-5626 www.rideuta.com WaSaTCh frONT reGiONaL COUNCiL 295 North Jimmy Doolittle road Salt Lake City, UT 84116 (801) 363-4250 www.wfrc.org 131949.indd 2 7/31/13 2:23 PM TaBLe Of CONTeNTS introduction 2 - Letter from the Chairs of the Utah Transportation Commission and Utah’s Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) - Letter from the Directors of the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and Utah’s MPOs - Purpose of Unified Transportation Planning UDOT’s Long range Plan 8 Utah MPO Long range Plans 12 - Wasatch Choices 2040 (Weber, Davis, Salt Lake and Utah Counties) - envision Cache valley (Cache County) - vision Dixie (Washington County) Utah’s Population Growth Challenge 16 Utah’s Project Planning & funding Process 20 - Project Development Process - Utah’s Transportation Needs and Preferences - financial Plan and assumptions - Continuous, Cooperative and Comprehensive Planning highway Projects by region 34 regionally important Transportation Projects 34 Utah highway Projects Map 35 highway Projects Phase One (2011-2020) 36- 41 highway Projects Phase Two (2021-2030) 42-46 highway Projects Phase Three (2031-2040) 47-50 highway Projects Unfunded 51 -52 Cache valley highway Projects Map 53 Wasatch front Ogden/Layton area highway Projects Map 54 Wasatch front Salt Lake valley highway Projects Map 55 Utah valley area highway Projects Map 56 Dixie area highway Projects Map 57 Transit Projects by region 58 Transit Projects Phase One (2011-2020) 59.
    [Show full text]
  • Weber County to Salt Lake Commuter Rail Project; Salt Lake City, Utah
    FrontRunner North Rail Project Before-and-After Study (2013) Salt Lake City, Utah Learn more: www.transit.dot.gov/before-and-after-studies Weber County to Salt Lake Commuter Rail Project; Salt Lake City, Utah The Weber County to Salt Lake Commuter Rail Project, known as FrontRunner North, is a 44- mile commuter rail line extending north from downtown Salt Lake City through Ogden to the northern end of Weber County at Pleasant View, Utah. The project was planned, developed, and built by the Utah Transit Authority (UTA). FrontRunner North is the first commuter rail service in the Salt Lake City metropolitan area. UTA operates the commuter rail line as part of a region- wide transit system that includes local and express buses, bus rapid transit, and light rail. In early 2013, UTA opened FrontRunner South, a 40-mile extension of the commuter rail line extending south from downtown Salt Lake City to Orem, Utah. In September 2001, an alternatives analysis identified commuter rail in the north-south corridor as the preferred alternative for transit improvements in the corridor. The project entered preliminary engineering (PE) in December 2003, and advanced into final design (FD) in June 2005. UTA and FTA executed a Full Funding Grant Agreement (FFGA) for the project in June 2006. The project opened to service in May 2008. The accompanying figure is a map of FrontRunner North and the corridor it serves. Physical scope of the project The project extends over 44 miles from the Salt Lake Intermodal Center just west of downtown Salt Lake City to the northern terminus at the Pleasant View Station.
    [Show full text]
  • June 8, 2017 to Members of Trans
    June 8, 2017 To Members of Trans Com and Other Interested Persons: A meeting of Trans Com will be held on Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. at the Wasatch Front Regional Council offices located at 295 North Jimmy Doolittle Road in Salt Lake City. The agenda will be as follows: 1. ACTION on minutes of April 20, 2017 meeting 2. Opportunity for public comment 3. Transportation Improvement Program a. Board Modifications to the 2017-2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) b. ACTION: Board Modifications to the 2017-2022 TIP c. ACTION: Release of Draft 2018-2023 TIP and Air Quality Conformity Analysis for Public Comment 4. Utah Transit Authority State of Good Repair Priority 5. Active Transportation Plan Standards 6. Traffic Signal Performance Metrics 7. Other business Sincerely, Mayor Karen Cronin Chair Note: Informational materials can be located on WFRC’s website at www.wfrc.org Public participation is solicited without regard to age, sex, disability, race, color or national origin. Persons who require translation for a meeting should contact the WFRC’s Title VI Administrator at 801-363-4250 or [email protected] at least 72 hours in advance. Se solicita la participación del público, sin importar la edad , el sexo , la discapacidad, la raza, color o nacionalidad. Personas que requieren servicios de traducción deben contactar a WFRC’s Administrador de Titulo VI al teléfono 801-363-4250 o [email protected] por lo menos 72 horas antes de la reunión. Trans Com April 20, 2017 Page 1 DRAFT TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE (Trans Com) Minutes Meeting of April 20, 2017 Mayor Karen Cronin, Chair, called Trans Com to order at 2:01 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Salt Lake LEGACY PARKWAY SCENIC BYWAY I 2008 Acknowledgements
    CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT GREAT SALT LAKE LEGACY PARKWAY SCENIC BYWAY I 2008 table of contents 1 introduction 5 2 the parkway 9 CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT 3 intrinsic qualities 15 4 vision 21 5 byway issues and goals 23 6 protecting the byway 27 7 interpretation 35 8 marketing opportunities 37 9 partnerships 39 10 strategic plan 41 11 appendix 45 12 letters of support 55 GREAT SALT LAKE LEGACY PARKWAY SCENIC BYWAY I 2008 acknowledgements Scenic Byway Committee : Farmington City Dave Peterson Centerville City Cory Snyder Woods Cross City Gary Uresk West Bountiful City Wendell Wild City of North Salt Lake Blaine Gehring Bountiful City Aric Jensen Davis County Economic Development Neka Roundy Davis County Trails Scott Hess North Davis County - West Point Mayor John Petroff Wasatch Front Regional Council LaNiece Dustman South Davis Sewer District Dal Wayment Rocky Mountain Power (....) Utah Department of Transportation Pete Jager Cory Pope Utah Travel Council Gael Hill Davis County Chamber of Commerce John Pitt Davis County Convention & Visitor Bureau Barbara Riddle Legacy Nature Preserve Lenora Sullivan Farmington Bay Waterfowl Mgt. Area Rich Hansen Friends of Great Salt Lake Lynne deFrietas Great Salt Lake Audubon Society Bruce Heath Consultants: MGB+A Sharen Hauri, Land Planner Acknowledgements: Photography By Sharen Hauri except as credited. Cover photo: Allysia Angus Quotes Friends of Great Salt Lake Graphic Design Items for the Legacy Parkway project completed by Carter-Burgess 1 introduction Artist’s vision for a parkway design. Great Salt Lake Legacy Parkway began as the Legacy Highway, a vision for a 150-mile long road along Utah’s urbanized Wasatch Front.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Connection to I-15 and Legacy Parkway Section 404(B)(1) Practicability Analysis
    Technical Memorandum 30: Southern Connection to I-15 and Legacy Parkway Section 404(b)(1) Practicability Analysis in support of the Environmental Impact Statement and Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit West Davis Corridor Project Federal Highway Administration Utah Department of Transportation UDOT Project No. S-0067(14)0 Prepared by HDR, Inc. 2825 E. Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, UT 84121 April 25, 2017 ii April 25, 2017 Executive Summary Introduction The Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are proposing a project (the West Davis Corridor) to improve regional mobility in Davis and Weber Counties, Utah. These lead agencies, together called the West Davis Corridor (WDC) team, are preparing the West Davis Corridor Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which will evaluate different alternatives for meeting the purpose of the project. All of the WDC action alternatives advanced in the EIS that propose a new roadway facility have a southern interchange with Interstate 15 (I-15) and Legacy Parkway. Since the start of the EIS process, the WDC Team has received numerous comments regarding potential alternative connections in Farmington and Kaysville (referred to in this document as southern alignment options). The WDC Team considered these various southern alignment options as part of the alternatives-evaluation process for the Draft EIS. At that time, the WDC Team concluded that only the Shepard Lane and Glovers Lane Options were reasonable and practicable. After the Draft EIS was published in May 2013, the WDC Team updated the EIS traffic analysis according to the Wasatch Front Regional Council’s (WFRC) 2015–2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and the associated 2016 travel demand model (version 8.1).
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2017 Utah State Educational Directory
    UTAH STATE EDUCATIONAL DIRECTORY www.schools.utah.gov 2016–17 Utah State Board of Education 250 East 500 South P.O. Box 144200 Salt Lake City, Ut 84114-4200 Sydnee Dickson, Ed.D. State Superintendent © ThinkStockPhotos of Public Instruction This directory is produced annually by the Utah State Board of Education. Revisions to the directory are solicited each year (see last page for Change of Information Form). Tina Morandy Utah State Board of Education 250 East 500 South P.O. Box 144200 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4200 Telephone: (801) 538-7526 Fax: (801) 538-7768 E-mail: [email protected] 2016–17 UTAH STATE EDUCATIONAL DIRECTORY Sydnee Dickson State Superintendent of Public Instruction Utah State Board of Education 250 East 500 South P.O. Box 144200 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4200 www.schools.utah.gov i ii TABLE OF CONTENTS QUICK REFERENCE North Summit School District ...................... 107 Fingertip Facts, 2016 ...................................... 1 Ogden City School District .......................... 108 Utah School Districts Map ............................... 2 Park City School District ............................. 109 District Superintendents, 2016–17 .................. 3 Piute School District .....................................110 Utah State Superintendents of Public Provo City School District ............................111 Instruction, 1851–2017 ............................. 4 Rich School District ......................................113 Utah State Government Offices ..................... 5 Salt Lake City School
    [Show full text]