DOCSLIB.ORG

Davis County Staycation Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Davis County Staycation Guide DAVIS COUNTY STAYCATION GUIDE A GUIDE TO FREE AND LOW-COST PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES IN DAVIS COUNTY bit.ly/staycationguidedavis 2 DAVIS COUNTY LINKS Davis County Resource Locator davis4health.org Davis County Tourism & Events 801-451-3237 playindavis.com Davis County Fair 151 S. 1100 W., Farmington 801-451-4080 daviscountyutah.gov/fair Legacy Events Center 151 S. 1100 W., Farmington 801-451-3080 daviscountyutah.gov/legacyeventscenter Davis County Trails Map daviscountyutah.gov/trails/ *bit.ly/staycationguidedavis *bit.ly/freshfoodfinder Updated December 2020 For questions concerning the information contained in this brochure please contact (801) 525-5070 Table of Contents Activity Pages Batting Cages 1 Bowling 2 Camping 3 Canoeing/Kayaking 4 Community Gardens 5 Disc Golf 6 Dog Parks 7 Farmers Markets/Produce Stands 8-10 Fishing 11-12 Miniature Golf 13 Mountain Bike/BMX 14 Nature Preserves 15 Parks: North Davis County 16-22 Parks: South Davis County 23-26 Pickle Ball Courts 27 Ponds, Lakes, Reservoirs 28 Recreation Centers 29 Roller Skating & Ice Skating 30 Skate Parks 31 Splash Pads 32 Swimming Pools 33 Tennis Courts 34-36 Trails 37-47 Volleyball Courts 48-49 BATTING CAGES KAYSVILLE Boondocks 525 Deseret Drive 801-660-6800 boondocks.com SYRACUSE The Rush Funplex 1806 S. 2000 W. 801-779-2695 therushfunplex.com 1 BOWLING BOUNTIFUL NORTH SALT LAKE Bountiful Place Orchard Lanes 409 S. 500 W. 30 S. 130 E. 801-292-2444 801 - 936 - 8700 bountiful-bowl.com orchardlanes.com KAYSVILLE SYRACUSE Boondocks The Rush Funplex 525 Deseret Drive 1806 S. 2000 W. 801-660-6800 801 - 779 - 2695 boondocks.com therushfunplex.com LAYTON Classic Fun Center 867 N. 1200 W. 801-544-3451 classicfuncenter.com Davis Lanes 1396 N. Main 801-544-1218 davislanes.net 2 CAMPING FARMINGTON NORTH SALT LAKE Bountiful Peak Campground Pony Express RV Park Located 8 miles up Farmington Canyon 1012 W. Recreation Way Can also be accessed using Skyline 801-355-1550 Drive. For more ponyexpressrvresort.com information contact Salt Lake Ranger District 801-733-2660 SYRACUSE Latitude: 40.980817 Antelope Island State Park Longitude: -111.804383 4528 W. 1700 S. Elevation: 7500 feet 801-773-2941 Reservations: Lagoon RV Park and Campground 1 - 800 - 322 - 3770 375 N. Lagoon Drive stateparks.utah.gov 801-451-8100 Toll free: 1-800-748-5246 ext. 3100 lagoonpark.com/parkinfo/camping KAYSVILLE Cherry Hill Resort and Waterpark 1325 S. Main Street 801-451-5379 cherry-hill.com East Wilderness Park 1599 E. 650 N. 5 walk-in campsites Reservations can be made at kaysvillecity.com Fires are not allowed at this time 3 CANOEING/KAYAKING CLINTON Clinton City Pond 2415 N 3000 W canoe, kayak, floating tube KAYSVILLE Kaysville Ponds 725 S. 50 W. canoe, floating tube NORTH SALT LAKE Porter's Landing Canoe Takeout 50 Jordan River Drive **end of the line for canoeing the Jordan River** SYRACUSE Jensen Nature Park Pond 3176 S Bluff Rd canoe, kayak, floating tube Antelope Island State Park 4528 W. 1700 S. canoe, kayak WOODS CROSS Bountiful Pond 1275 W 1600 N canoe, kayak *No motorized water craft *No fishing from canoe, kayak, or floating tubes *Check with city for permit information 4 COMMUNITY GARDENS CENTERVILLE FARMINGTON 168 N. Main Street 541 W. Rigby Rd Coordinator: Erin Redds Coordinator: Karen Rigby Contact: [email protected] Contact: karenmari- [email protected] Episcopal Church of the Res- urrection KAYSVILLE 1131 S. Main Street 478 S. Main Street Coordinator: Wim Ray Coordinator: Ron Zollinger Contact: [email protected] Contact: [email protected] CLEARFIELD NORTH SALT LAKE 896 S. 1000 E. Corner of Center St. and Orchard Coordinator: Sheila Olsen Dr. Contact: shei- Coordinator: Afton Paul [email protected] Contact: [email protected] CLINTON SYRACUSE 600 N. 1600 W. 2356 S. 1000 W. Coordinator: Terri Jenson Coordinator: Kresta Robinson Contact: tjen- Contact: krobin- [email protected] [email protected] *bit.ly/freshfoodfinder 5 DISC GOLF CENTERVILLE Freedom Hills Park 2250 N. 150 E. 9 holes KAYSVILLE Davis Applied Technology College 550 E. 300 S. 15 holes WOODS CROSS Mills Park 1850 S. 1200 W. 12 Holes 6 DOG PARKS BOUNTIFUL Bountiful City Dog Park 1050 S. 200 W. Brickyard Park 245 W.1050 S. FARMINGTON Legacy Events Center Dog Park 151 S. 1100 W. 801-451-4080 Park on south end next to dog park 7 FARMERS MARKETS & PRODUCE BOUNTIFUL 3 Squares Produce Farm: 1625 Orchard Drive Bountiful Farmers Market: 400 N. 200 W. Chas W. Bangerter & Son: 1304 N. 400 E. Duncan Orchards: 1330 N. 200 E. Skinner Produce: 1825 S. 275 W. CENTERVILLE Skinner Produce: 55 S. Main CLEARFIELD Miya's Farm: 107 S. 1000 W. Wilcox Farms: 1455 S. 1000 W. CLINTON Dreamfield Farms: 1071 N. 2000 W. FARMINGTON Pack Farms Pumpkin Patch: 1700 W. Glover Lane *bit.ly/freshfoodfinder 8 FARMERS MARKETS & PRODUCE FRUIT HEIGHTS Garn Butcher: 83 S. 1375 E. Manning Orchard: 107 N. Mountain Road KAYSVILLE Borski Organic Farms: 310 N. Main Kohles' Family Farm: 388 Boynton Rd *Accepts SNAP USU Botanical Center Farmers Market: 875 S. 50 W. *Accepts SNAP LAYTON Day Farms: 2516 W. Gentile St. Dibble Farms: 2463 W. Gentile St. Haystack Farms: www.haystackfarm.blogspot.com Little Field Produce: 2139 N. Fairfield Roberts Family Farm: 928 S. Angel St. Skinner Produce: 1480 N. Hwy 89 Zoe's Garden: 1700 N. Fort Ln 9 FARMERS MARKETS & PRODUCE SOUTH WEBER Big Foot Farms: 356 East S. Weber Drive SYRACUSE Black Island Farms: 3178 S. 3000 W. Syracuse City Farmers Market: 1891 W. 1700 S. *Accepts SNAP WEST POINT Bennett Farms: 950 N. 4000 W. East Farms: 4910 W. Canvasback Ln *bit.ly/freshfoodfinder 10 Fishing Governed by Utah State Fishing Regulations - fishing license required: https://wildlifelicense.utah.gov/hflo/main/serv1/index.html?server=serv1 CLEARFIELD Steed Park 550 N. 1000 W. 2-fish limit per person CLINTON Clinton City Pond 2415 N. 3000 W. 2-fish limit per person Pond Park 2850 W. 2415 N. FARMINGTON Farmington Pond 750 N. 75 W. KAYSVILLE Kaysville Ponds 725 S. 50 W. 2-fish limit per person *While not mandatory, the Division of Wildlife encourages the release of all bass at community waters. 11 Fishing Governed by Utah State Fishing Regulations - fishing license required: https://wildlifelicense.utah.gov/hflo/main/serv1/index.html?server=serv1 LAYTON Andy Adams Reservoir 1799 E 1000 N Holmes Creek Reservoir 2692 E Gentile St. Hobbs Reservoir 2360 E Canyon View Dr Sign in access required see DWR website for information SYRACUSE Jensen Park 3176 S Bluff Road 2-fish limit per person WOODS CROSS Bountiful Pond 1275 W. 1600 N. 2-fish limit per person *While not mandatory, the Division of Wildlife encourages the release of all bass at community waters. 12 MINIATURE GOLF KAYSVILLE Boondocks 525 Deseret Drive 801-660-6800 boondocks.com Cherry Hill 1325 S. Main Street 801-451-5379 cherry-hill.com LAYTON Swan Lakes Golf Course 850 N. 2200 W. 801-546-1045 swanlakesgolf.com SYRACUSE The Rush Funplex 1806 S. 2000 W. 801-779-2695 therushfunplex.com 13 MOUNTAIN BIKE/BMX MOUNTAIN BIKE There are numerous mountain biking trails in Davis County. Listed be- low are the top five as noted by playindavis.com: Bonneville Shoreline Trail: I-84 to Farmington Link: goo.gl/NW2yFU Mueller Park Trail: Bountiful Link: goo.gl/NjU6XT East Mountain Wilderness Trail: Kaysville Link goo.gl/gOsSbx Mountain View Trail: Antelope Island Link: goo.gl/cvtfvt Wild Rose Trail: North Salt Lake Link: http://www.utahmountainbiking.com/trails/wildrose.htm A Trails and Bikeways Map is available at any city office building or bike shop in Davis County. (Source: https://www.playindavis.com/top-5-mountain-bike-trails-davis- county/) BMX FARMINGTON Legacy Raceyway BMX: 151 S. 1100 W. www.lrbmx.com 14 NATURE PRESERVES FARMINGTON Great Salt Lake Nature Center 1700 W. Glovers Lane 801-589-2373 wildlife.utah.gov/learn-more/nature-center.html LAYTON Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve 41 S. 3200 W. 801-531-0999 goo.gl/z4aaPN 15 PARKS: NORTH DAVIS COUNTY CLEARFIELD (801-525-2700) Barlow Park: 2100 S. 500 W. Bernard Fisher Park: 934 S. 1000 E. Bicentennial Park: 931 E. 600 S. Central Park: 300 E. Center St. Chelmes Park: 2100 S. 1000 E. Cornerstone Park: 2601 S. Main St. Fox Hollow Park & Aboretum: 2050 S. 575 E. Hoggans' Park: 234 W. 550 N. Island View Park: 1800 S. Main St. Jacobsen Park: 1045 S. 1350 W. Kiwanis Park: 300 N. Vine St. Steed Park: 300 N. 1000 W. Thornock Family Memorial Park: 200 S. 500 W. Train Watch Park: 200 W. 250 N. ** Please contact the city for more information about park policies— especially regarding dogs 16 PARKS: NORTH DAVIS COUNTY CLINTON (801-614-0780) Clinton City Park: 2300 N. 1500 W. (Dogs allowed on track) Clinton City Pond Park: 2850 W. 2415 N. Heritage Park: 1300 N. 1000 W. Kestral Park: 1740 N. 3420 W. (Dogs allowed on track) Meadows Park: 575 W. 2300 N. (Dogs allowed on track) Powerline Park: 1660 W. 1740 S. (Dogs allowed on track) Trail Side Park: 1000 W. 2300 N. (Dogs allowed on track) Veterans Park: 1705 N. 1000 W West Clinton Park: 2013 N. 2750 W. FRUIT HEIGHTS (801-546-0861) Creekview Park: 1041 E. Pheasant View Drive Ellison Farms Park: 887 E. Country Rd Harvey Park: 910 S. Mountain Rd Nicholls Park: 1105 Nicholls Rd ** Please contact the city for more information about park policies— especially regarding dogs 17 PARKS: NORTH DAVIS COUNTY KAYSVILLE (801-544-1788) Angel Street Soccer Complex: 150 S. Angel St Barnes Park: 950 W. 200 N. City Park: 44 N. Main St. DATC Park: 550 S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Glovers Interchange Design Selection
    Technical Memorandum 23: Glovers Interchange Design Selection in support of the Environmental Impact Statement West Davis Corridor Project Federal Highway Administration Utah Department of Transportation UDOT Project No. S-0067(14)0 Prepared by Horrocks Engineers 2162 W. Grove Parkway Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 November 2016 Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................................... 2 2.1 Design Criteria ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Design Variables ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Concept Development ................................................................................................................ 3 3.0 CONCEPTS SELECTED FOR COMPARISON ................................................................. 4 3.1 Northbound Concepts ................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Southbound Concepts ................................................................................................................ 5 4.0 CONCEPT COMPARISON ............................................................................................. 5 4.1 Level of Service Pre-screening Evaluation ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment and Friends of Great Salt Lake, Petitioners/Appellants, Vs. Executive Director Of
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000– ) 2015 Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment and Friends of Great Salt Lake, Petitioners/Appellants, vs. Executive Director of the Department of Environmental Quality Et Al., Respondents/ Appellees Utah Supreme Court Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc2 Part of the Law Commons Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. Recommended Citation Supplemental Submission, Utah Physicians v Department Environment, No. 20150344 (Utah Supreme Court, 2015). https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc2/3312 This Supplemental Submission is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000– ) by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/ utah_court_briefs/policies.html. Please contact the Repository Manager at [email protected] with questions or feedback. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH UTAH PHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTHY Appeal No. 20150344-SC ENVIRONMENT and FRIENDS OF GREAT SALT LAKE, Agency Decision Nos. Petitioners/Appellants, N10123-0041 v. DAQE-AN101230041-13 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, et al., Respondents/Appellees. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF HOLLY REFINING AND MARKETING CO. Appeal from the Final Order of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Executive Director Amanda Smith Joro Walker Steven J. Christiansen (5265) Charles R. Dubuc David C.
    [Show full text]
  • County Commission Update: Protecting a Vital Natural Resource
    County Commission Update: Protecting a Vital Natural Resource By Wade Mathews, Public Information Officer It’s a remnant of an ancient body of water that once covered most of our county and much of the western states region. Now the Great Salt Lake is all that remains of Lake Bonneville. Because of its unique mineral qualities, the Great Salt Lake, specifically its south arm, provides a valuable resource to our county. The lake’s minerals are utilized by several large businesses in Tooele County, it provides recreation opportunities, and the lake is a great tourist attraction to this area. But that resource that is the Great Salt Lake is being threatened. The Tooele County Commission has learned of a proposal by Great Salt Lake Minerals Corporation (GSL), located on the north side of the lake that has the potential of decreasing the level of the southern arm by six to 30 inches a year. GSL originally proposed withdrawing 360,000 acre feet of water per year from the north arm of the lake. Due to some criticism, GSL may reduce that request. The lake is already at historic low levels due to the past draught experienced in the region. Commissioner Jerry Hurst says, “GSL’s proposal could have a drastic effect on the operations of our businesses located along the southern shore. Five major companies and several small businesses rely on the lake being at a certain level and on having high salinity content.” Those major companies include Morton Salt, Cargill Salt, Broken Arrow, US Magnesium and Allegheny Technologies. They make up the Tooele County Great Salt Lake South Arm Industry Consortium.
    [Show full text]
  • Farmington Active Transportation Plan Connecting Our Community Through Safe Walking & Bicycling
    Farmington Active Transportation Plan Connecting Our Community Through Safe Walking & Bicycling MARCH 2016 This Plan was prepared for Farmington City by Alta Planning + Design and Ensign Engineering, with funding and planning assistance from the Wasatch Front Regional Council. PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE & CONSULTANT TEAM: FARMINGTON RESIDENTS, BUSINESS OWNERS Amy Shumway, Farmington Trails Committee Jeff Hepworth, Owner, Loyal Cycle Co. Table of Contents Chad Stone 1: Introduction . 1 About the Plan .....................................................................1 Why Walking & Bicycling? .................................................1 FARMINGTON CITY Eric Anderson, Project Manager & Associate Planner Local Walking & Bicycling Trends ...................................4 David Petersen, Community Development Director National Walking & Bicycling Trends .............................6 Connectivity To Transit ......................................................6 FARMINGTON CITY COUNCIL Existing Plans & Studies ....................................................8 Doug Anderson, Councilmember Existing Codes & Policies ................................................13 Existing Programs & Events ...........................................15 2: Public Involvement . 17 KAYSVILLE RESIDENTS, BUSINESS OWNERS Zach Chatelain, Owner, Biker’s Edge Field Investigation Bike Ride ..........................................17 Brady Edwards, Owners, Bountiful Bicycle Interactive Online Mapping Tool ..................................17 Russell Lindberg,
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Dynamics in the Jordan River and Great
    NUTRIENT DYNAMICS IN THE JORDAN RIVER AND GREAT SALT LAKE WETLANDS by Shaikha Binte Abedin A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Utah August 2016 Copyright © Shaikha Binte Abedin 2016 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Shaikha Binte Abedin has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Ramesh K. Goel , Chair 03/08/2016 Date Approved Michael E. Barber , Member 03/08/2016 Date Approved Steven J. Burian , Member 03/08/2016 Date Approved and by Michael E. Barber , Chair/Dean of the Department/College/School of Civil and Environmental Engineering and by David B. Kieda, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT In an era of growing urbanization, anthropological changes like hydraulic modification and industrial pollutant discharge have caused a variety of ailments to urban rivers, which include organic matter and nutrient enrichment, loss of biodiversity, and chronically low dissolved oxygen concentrations. Utah’s Jordan River is no exception, with nitrogen contamination, persistently low oxygen concentration and high organic matter being among the major current issues. The purpose of this research was to look into the nitrogen and oxygen dynamics at selected sites along the Jordan River and wetlands associated with Great Salt Lake (GSL). To demonstrate these dynamics, sediment oxygen demand (SOD) and nutrient flux experiments were conducted twice through the summer, 2015. The SOD ranged from 2.4 to 2.9 g-DO m-2 day-1 in Jordan River sediments, whereas at wetland sites, the SOD was as high as 11.8 g-DO m-2 day-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Salt Lake FAQ June 2013 Natural History Museum of Utah
    Great Salt Lake FAQ June 2013 Natural History Museum of Utah What is the origin of the Great Salt Lake? o After the Lake Bonneville flood, the Great Basin gradually became warmer and drier. Lake Bonneville began to shrink due to increased evaporation. Today's Great Salt Lake is a large remnant of Lake Bonneville, and occupies the lowest depression in the Great Basin. Who discovered Great Salt Lake? o The Spanish missionary explorers Dominguez and Escalante learned of Great Salt Lake from the Native Americans in 1776, but they never actually saw it. The first white person known to have visited the lake was Jim Bridger in 1825. Other fur trappers, such as Etienne Provost, may have beaten Bridger to its shores, but there is no proof of this. The first scientific examination of the lake was undertaken in 1843 by John C. Fremont; this expedition included the legendary Kit Carson. A cross, carved into a rock near the summit of Fremont Island, reportedly by Carson, can still be seen today. Why is the Great Salt Lake salty? o Much of the salt now contained in the Great Salt Lake was originally in the water of Lake Bonneville. Even though Lake Bonneville was fairly fresh, it contained salt that concentrated as its water evaporated. A small amount of dissolved salts, leached from the soil and rocks, is deposited in Great Salt Lake every year by rivers that flow into the lake. About two million tons of dissolved salts enter the lake each year by this means. Where does the Great Salt Lake get its water, and where does the water go? o Great Salt Lake receives water from four main rivers and numerous small streams (66 percent), direct precipitation into the lake (31 percent), and from ground water (3 percent).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Document Powerpoint
    ACTIVE & PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CONNECTIVITY TEMPLE BETWEEN JORTH RDAN RIVER PARKWAY TRAIL N 1 Department of CITY & METROPOLITAN PLANNING U• THE U NIVERSITY OF UTAH Students Jordan Baker, Aaron Barlow, Tyler Cain, Kevin Cisney, John Close, Jeni Crookston, Christy Dahlberg, Annaka Egan, Brian Hoole, Christianna Johnson, Shabnam Sifat ara Khan, Isobel Lingenfelter, Steven Lizzarago, Lynn Lyons, Sharif Mahmud, Amber Mortensen, Xiaoyang Niu, Corinne Piazza, Sydney Rich, Jenna Simkins, Kathrine Skollingsberg, Instructors Ivis Garcia, Christina Oostema Brown TA’s Ian Kilpatrick, Megan Townsend Acknowledgments Access North Temple Fairpark Community Council Green Bike Jordan River Commission National Park Service NeighborWorks Poplar Grove Community Council Seven Canyon Trust SLC Bike Collective SLC Gov University Neighborhood Partners CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Methods 5 Getting to Know the West Side 6 History of the West Side 6 Socioeconomics 7 Destinations 10 Biking 16 Walking 18 Transit 26 Learning from Community Members 30 Focus Groups 30 Community Survey 33 Recommendations 35 Implementation 38 Conclusion 40 Works Cited 41 Works Referenced 42 Executive Summary This report explores active transportation connections between the Jordan River Parkway Trail and the North Temple corridor. The end goal of this project is to identify positive examples of existing connections in the area, and to identify ways to improve in places that present opportunities for good transportation infrastructure, such as signage, trails, crosswalks, and transit. In order to accomplish those goals, the class collected surveys from west side residents about their thoughts on topics such as neighborhood uses and possible changes to North Temple and the Jordan River Parkway Trail. Those survey results were combined with information collected from six focus groups comprised of approximately 18 residents of west side communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Great Salt Lake Bird Festival Visitors: Applying the Recreational Specialization Framework
    Understanding Great Salt Lake Bird Festival Visitors: Applying the Recreational Specialization Framework Steven W. Burr David Scott1 Introduction The growth of birdwatching over the last two decades has been staggering. According to the recent National Survey of Recreation and the Environment (NSRE) (2000-2002), one-third (33%) of American adults said they went birdwatching at least once during the previous 12 months. According to NSRE data, the number of people who regarded themselves as birdwatchers increased 27% between 1995 and 2001 and an incredible 225% between 1982 and 1991. Although most people watch birds exclusively in their yards, 40% of birdwatchers leave their homes to look at birds (U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2002). The economic impacts of birdwatching are remarkable as well, with thousands of birders visiting birding “hotspots” and collectively spending millions of dollars during such outings, resulting in significant economic benefits locally (Crandall, Leones, & Colby, 1992; Kerlinger & Wiedner, 1994; Kim, Scott, Thigpen, & Kim, 1997; Eubanks, Kerlinger, & Payne, 1993). This has spurred community development and conservation leaders to develop festivals and special events attractive to birdwatchers. Today, there are approximately 200 birdwatching and wildlife-watching festivals held throughout the United States and Canada (American Birding Association, 2001). One of these is the Great Salt Lake Bird Festival, which was established in 1999 and has experienced growth over the years in the number of visitors attending, with approximately 3,000 visitors attending in 2002 and 3,500 attending in 2003 (N. Roundy, personal communication, July 15, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared for the Utah Department of Transportation and the Wasatch Front Regional Council
    NORTH LEGACY TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR SUPPLEMENTAL STUDY Prepared for the Utah Department of Transportation and the Wasatch Front Regional Council October 2009 North Legacy Transportation Corridor Supplemental Study Prepared for the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) and the Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) Prepared by InterPlan Co. In cooperation with Wilkinson Ferrari & Company and HDR Engineering, Inc. Vern Keeslar InterPlan Thomas McMurtry InterPlan Matt Riffkin InterPlan Dana Holmes HDR Susan Lee HDR Mimi Charles Wilkinson Ferrari & Company Bethany Matsumori Wilkinson Ferrari & Company Amy Steinbrech Wilkinson Ferrari & Company October 2009 Table of Contents Executive Summary .....................................................................................1 Summary of Study Purpose.................................................................................. 1 North Legacy Draft Purpose and Need................................................................. 1 North Legacy Alignment to be Preserved ............................................................. 2 Chapter 1 Introduction..................................................................................5 Study Overview .................................................................................................... 5 Benefits and Principles of Corridor Preservation .................................................. 6 Benefits......................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Inverness Square •
    Click images to view full size Inverness Square Murray, Utah Project Type: Residential Volume 38 Number 02 January–March 2008 Case Number: C038002 PROJECT TYPE Comprising 119 Federal-style brick townhouses on a seven-acre (2.84-ha) site, Inverness Square is located on a former brownfield close to a regional commuter rail line. One of the first of its kind in Murray, Utah, a suburb of Salt Lake City, the new urbanist infill community has helped revitalize a formerly blighted area through environmental remediation and enhanced streetscapes. In addition, the project, developed by Hamlet Homes, was intended as workforce housing with opening prices starting at $140,000. LOCATION Outer Suburban SITE SIZE 7.02 acres/2.84 hectares LAND USES Townhomes KEYWORDS/SPECIAL FEATURES Brownfield Zero-Lot-Line Housing Infill Development Workforce Housing WEB SITE www.hamlethomes.com PROJECT ADDRESS 300 West and 4800 South Murray, Utah DEVELOPER Hamlet Development Corporation Murray, Utah 801-281-2223 www.hamlethomes.com ARCHITECT D.W. Taylor Associates, Inc. Ellicott City, Maryland 410-964-1181 www.dwtaylor.com PLANNER Blake McCutchan & Associates Salt Lake City, Utah 801-467-0067 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Providing workforce housing in a suburb of Salt Lake City, Inverness Square consists of 119 moderately priced Federal-style townhomes. Developed by Hamlet Homes, the project required environmental remediation of mining- related contaminants—a major development roadblock in the former industrial town of Murray, Utah. In addition to its dense, urban design, Inverness Square is within a half-mile (0.8 km) of the nearest TRAX station, the light-rail system that connects the greater Salt Lake area.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments and Responses for the Final EIS
    Comments and Responses for the Final EIS in support of the Environmental Impact Statement West Davis Corridor Project Federal Highway Administration Utah Department of Transportation in cooperation with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Utah Reclamation, Mitigation, and Conservation Commission Project No. F-0067(14)0 Prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc. 2825 E. Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, UT 84121-7077 September 29, 2017 This page is intentionally blank. Contents 1.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Chapter 1 – Purpose of and Need for Action ............................................................................. 3 1.1.1 Section 1.2 – Description of the Needs Assessment Study Area ................................. 3 1.1.2 Section 1.4 – Summary of Purpose and Need.............................................................. 5 1.2 Chapter 2 – Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 7 1.2.1 Section 2.1 – Background of the Alternatives-Development Process ......................... 7 1.2.2 Section 2.2 – Alternatives-Development Process for the Final EIS ............................ 7 1.2.3 Section 2.3 – WDC Roadway Design Elements ........................................................ 20 1.2.4 Section 2.4 – Description of Alternatives Carried Forward for Detailed Study .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parks & Recreation 2017 Master Plan
    South Jordan Parks, Recreation, Community Arts, Trails and Open Space Master Plan Adopted February 21, 2017 (Resolution R2017-02) Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... iii 3 Recreation Facilities & Community Arts .........................................................12 Existing Public Recreation Facilities ....................................................................................................................................... 12 South Jordan Fitness and Aquatics Center ............................................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 South Jordan Community and Senior Center ........................................................................................................... 12 Organization of the Plan ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Marv Jensen Recreation Center ................................................................................................................................ 13 South Jordan Community Profile .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Existing Public Recreation Events, Activities and Programs ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]