DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Assessment GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT VISTA SOLEADA PROJECT (TTM 36590) Located Within SECTION 35, RANGE 7 EAST, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH GPA # 01125 and Tract # 36590 Parcel 764-290-003 Riverside County, California Prepared For: MERIDIAN CONSULTANTS 860 Hampshire Road, Suite P Westlake Village, California 91361 E-mail [email protected] Telephone 805-367-5734 Field Study and Report Completed By: JAMES W. CORNETT Ecological Consultants P.O. Box 846 Palm Springs, California 92263 760-320-8135 November 4, 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An intensive plant and animal survey was conducted on an 80-acre site located adjacent to the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California. The entire project site is an active agricultural field. No sensitive or non-covered species were observed on the project site. Grading and development of the site will have no direct or indirect significant adverse impacts upon biological resources in the region. CONTENTS Executive Summary . 3 Introduction . 4 Figure 1, Regional Location Map . 5 Figure 2, Area Location Map . 6 Figure 3, Project Site Location . 7 Figures 4-7, Project Site Images . 8 Site and Project Descriptions . 9 Study Methods . 11 Plant Survey Results . 13 Animal Survey Results . 15 Findings and Recommendations . 17 References . 19 Certification Statement . 20 Appendix . 21 Table 1 - Plant List . 22 Table 2 – Animal List . 24 Vista Soleada Biological Study Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A proposed residential subdivision in an unincorporated area adjacent to the City of La Quinta and totaling 80 acres necessitated a biological resource analysis and field surveys for non- covered species as indicated under the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). The western burrowing owl, a non-covered species under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, was not observed on or near the project site. However the burrowing owl is known to occur in the general region and could take up residence on the project site at any time. Therefore, a burrowing owl clearance survey should occur not more than 30 days prior to ground disturbance. The loggerhead shrike, a non-covered State-Sensitive Species was not observed on the project site and no active or abandoned nests were found. In addition, no suitable nesting habitat for this species was found on the project site. Therefore, no future breeding surveys for this species are recommended. Although the desert tortoise is a covered species under the CVMSHCP, clearance surveys for the tortoise can be required by the United State Fish & Wildlife Service prior to site disturbance. Field surveys, however, revealed no evidence of the desert tortoise within or adjacent to the project site and no suitable habitat for this species occurs on or near the project site. Therefore, no additional surveys for this species are recommended. The federally endangered Casey’s June beetle is known to occur within the Coachella Valley and is not a covered species under the CVMSHCP. However, this species has not yet been found in the lower Coachella Valley. Therefore, Casey’s June beetle was determined not to occur on the project site and no further surveys or mitigation for this species are recommended or required. The project site does not lie within a Conservation Area of the CVMSHCP. Blue-line stream corridors (streams or dry washes) are not a covered habitat under the CVMSHCP. However, no such corridors were present and no botanical indicators of such corridors existed within the project boundaries. Therefore, there are no biological justifications for the requiring of streambed alteration permits from state or federal agencies. Following the implementation of the required and recommended mitigation described in this report, development of the project site is not expected to have significant adverse impacts upon sensitive species or other biological resources in the region. Vista Soleada Biological Study Page 3 I. INTRODUCTION On October 19, 2013, the firm of James W. Cornett - Ecological Consultants, Inc., was retained by Meridian Consultants to conduct a biological survey and analysis on an approximately 80- acre site located in an unincorporated area adjacent to the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California. The project site encompassed a portion of Section 35, Range 7 East, Township 6 South (San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian). The regional location is shown in Figure 1, the area location in Figure 2, and the specific location with project boundaries is shown in Figure 3. Site photographs are shown in Figures 4-7. This study was included as part of an environmental assessment mandated by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Riverside County, California. The biological survey and impact analysis were designed to ascertain the impacts of development on the biological resources of the project site and immediate vicinity. The specific purposes of the biological surveys and impact analyses are listed below. 1. Determine the vascular plant and vertebrate animal species that occur on, and immediately adjacent to, the project site. 2. Ascertain the presence of any plant or animal species given special status by federal or state governments or is not a covered species under the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. 3. Ascertain the existence of other significant biotic elements, corridors or communities, particularly those not covered under the CVMSHCP. 4. Consider the site location as it relates to Conservation Areas as designated under the CVMSHCP. 5. If necessary and where feasible, recommend measures to mitigate significant adverse impacts of the project on any non-covered or special-status species, unique biotic elements or communities. Vista Soleada Biological Study Page 4 Figure 1. Regional Location Project Site Riverside Joshua Tree National Park La Quinta* N Figure 2. Area Location Project Site Monroe Street La Quinta 60th Avenue * N Figure 3. Project Site (in red) Monroe Street 60th Avenue 61st Avenue N Project Site Figures 4-7. Project Site Images Figure 4. View across site to northheast. Figure 5. View across site to northwest. Figure 6. View across site to southwest. Figure 7. View across site to southeast. II. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Climate The project area lies within the confines of a geographical region known as the Colorado Desert (Jaeger, 1957). As is typical of this subdivision of the Sonoran Desert, annual rainfall averages less than five inches (National Climatic Center, 2012). Most precipitation falls during the winter and late spring with occasional summer storms accounting for approximately one fifth of the annual total. Winter days are mild, averaging 71 degrees Fahrenheit. Winter nights occasionally drop to near freezing. The month of July brings the hottest temperatures with daytime highs averaging 108 degrees F. Physical Features The elevation of the project site ranges from approximately 79 feet below sea level at the northwest corner of the project site declining to 88 feet below sea level in the southeast corner. Except for five-foot high berms that contain a small irrigation pond in the extreme northwest corner of the site, there is no topographical relief. There are no naturally occurring springs or permanent aquatic habitats within the project site boundaries. No blue-line stream corridors (streams or dry washes) are shown on U.S. Geological Survey maps for the project site nor are there botanical indicators of such corridors. Thus, there appear to be no biological justifications for the requiring of streambed alteration permits from state or federal governments. Soil characteristics are uniform over the entire site. Soil is composed of fine silt, the former lakebed of ancient Lake Cahuilla that occupied the area approximately five hundred years before present. Surrounding Lands To the east of the project site is an abandoned agricultural field overgrown with both native and introduced weed species. th To the north of the project site lies 60 Avenue and an active agricultural field. st To the south of the project site exists 61 Avenue and active agricultural area. Vista Soleada Biological Study Page 9 To the west of the project site lays an abandoned agricultural field presently overgrown with native and introduced weed species. Existing Impacts The project site is an active agricultural field that was plowed and planted as of October 31, 2013. No native vegetation communities exist on site. Project Description The entire project area is to be graded and residential units and paved access streets are to be constructed. Vista Soleada Biological Study Page 10 III. STUDY METHODS Prior to the initiation of field work, reviews of the literature and institutional records were conducted to determine the biological resources that might exist within the general area and to determine the possible occurrence of special status species. Records, collections, websites and/or staff of the University of California at Riverside Herbarium, the Boyd Deep Canyon Desert Research Center and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments were consulted for specific information as to the occurrence of selected species. A California Department of Fish & Game Natural Diversity Database (updated, October, 2013) check was also reviewed. Field surveys were initiated in October of 2013. Specific dates of biological surveys were October 22, 26, 27 and 30, 2013. A night survey were conducted on the evening of October 23, 2013. Survey dates occurred in fall when most perennial species and most resident bird and mammal species would be observed. Survey dates did not include spring when most ephemeral plant and reptile species would be encountered. However, because no native plant communities existed on site it was concluded that no sensitive plant species were likely to occur on or near the project boundaries. Because the project site was an active agricultural field, surveys were conducted by walking around the perimeter of the project site and using binoculars to examine the site interior. This technique was considered adequate since the site had been plowed and planted within a few days of the first survey on October 22.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for Casey’S June Beetle and Designation of Critical Habitat; Final Rule
    Vol. 76 Thursday, No. 184 September 22, 2011 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for Casey’s June Beetle and Designation of Critical Habitat; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:48 Sep 21, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\22SER3.SGM 22SER3 jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES3 58954 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 184 / Thursday, September 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR family (Scarabaeidae) (Smith and Evans in the proposed rule) (Hawks pers. 2005). Despite past references to comm., 2010; see below discussion). Fish and Wildlife Service potentially new species or subspecies of Hawks (pers. comm. 2010, 2011a and Dinacoma (Blaisdell 1930, pp. 173–174; b) located two occupied Casey’s June 50 CFR Part 17 La Rue pers. comm., 2006), Casey’s June beetle sites outside of proposed critical habitat, in natural remnants of the Palm [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2009–0019; MO beetle, Dinacoma caseyi Blaisdell, and 92210–0–0009] D. marginata (Casey) Casey remain the Canyon Wash channel surrounded by only described taxonomic entities in the golf course landscaping just east of the RIN 1018–AV91 genus (Evans and Smith 2009, p. 44). easternmost section of wash proposed as critical habitat, in the vicinity of Golf Endangered and Threatened Wildlife For additional information on the taxonomy, biology, and ecology of Club Drive. These wash habitat and Plants; Determination of remnants total 17 acres (ac) (7 hectares Endangered Status for Casey’s June Casey’s June beetle, and the history of this rulemaking, refer to the August 8, (ha)), and are downstream from the Beetle and Designation of Critical confluence of Palm Canyon Wash and Habitat 2006, 90-day finding (71 FR 44960), the July 5, 2007, 12-month finding (72 FR Tahquiz Creek, where additional AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 36635), the July 9, 2009, proposed streamflow occurs following a storm Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarabs Stlqikwmthlffnyotsieiiec
    SCARABS STLQIKWMTHLFFNYOTSIEIIEC Occasional Issue Number 84 Print ISSN 1937-8343 Online ISSN 1937-8351 September, 2017 Notes on the Genus Pachypus (Coleoptera: WITHIN THIS ISSUE Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae: Pachypodini) Notes on the Genus Pachypus ............................ 1 by Stéphane Le Tirant & René Limoges Ville de Montréal Delbert LaRue ................... 7 Montréal Insectarium 4581 rue Sherbrooke Elephant Dung Beetles ... 9 Montréal, Quebec Canada H1X 2B2 Dave Marqua .................. 16 Email: [email protected] Introduction P. sardiniensis Guerlach, Bazzato, Cillo, 2013 - (Sardinia - endemic). To date, no article or photograph of the Pachypodini tribe has ever The species are very similar, making been published in Scarabs. We identification difficult. There is also thought it would be interesting wide variability within each species. to present an overview of genus Pachypus, along with a few Genus Pachypus has antennae BACK ISSUES spectacular photographs of these with eight segments, five of them Available At These Sites: fascinating beetles. comprising the club. These beetles are usually 12 to 16 mm long. The Coleopterists Society www.coleopsoc.org/de- History males have a deeply excavated fault.asp?Action=Show_ pronotum on the disk. The Resources&ID=Scarabs The Pachypodini tribe was created females, few of which are found by Erichson in 1840 and contains in collections, have no scutellum, University of Nebraska a single genus: Pachypus (Dejean wings or elytra whatsoever. www-museum.unl.edu/ research/entomology/ 1821). Five species have been Scarabs-Newsletter.htm described thus far: Mysterious Biology EDITORS Pachypus caesus Erichson, 1840 - The male and female biology is Rich Cunningham (Italy. Sicily - endemic). fascinating. The male spends much [email protected] P.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Nearctic Desert Sand Dune Orthoptera: a New Genus And
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 25 Article 4 Number 3 – Number 4 12-31-1965 Studies in Nearctic desert sand dune Orthoptera: a new genus and species of stenopelmatine crickets from the Kelso Dunes with notes on its multi- annual life history and key. Part X Ernest R. Tinkham Indio, California Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Tinkham, Ernest R. (1965) "Studies in Nearctic desert sand dune Orthoptera: a new genus and species of stenopelmatine crickets from the Kelso Dunes with notes on its multi-annual life history and key. Part X," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 25 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol25/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. STUDIES IN NEARCTIC DESERT SAND DUNE OR'IHOPTERA A new (ienus and Species of Stenopehnatine Crickets fioni the Kelso Dunes with notes on its multi-annual life history and k(>\-. Part X Eitu'st R. Tinkliiiin' During the past decade the author has made a score of trips to the great Kelso Dunes studying its fauna and flora; the summers of 1957-1960 assisted by National Science Foundation grants. As these dunes lie 155 miles north of Indio. California, by road, a total of 6200 miles has been travelled in these trips during the period 1954-1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Monday, November 9, 2009 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:08 Nov 06, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09NOP3.SGM 09NOP3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 57804 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR October 1, 2008, through September 30, for public inspection by appointment, 2009. during normal business hours, at the Fish and Wildlife Service We request additional status appropriate Regional Office listed below information that may be available for in under Request for Information in 50 CFR Part 17 the 249 candidate species identified in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0075; MO- this CNOR. information we receive will be available 9221050083–B2] DATES: We will accept information on at the Branch of Candidate this Candidate Notice of Review at any Conservation, Arlington, VA (see Endangered and Threatened Wildlife time. address above). and Plants; Review of Native Species ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Notice of Review That Are Candidates for Listing as the Internet at http:// Endangered or Threatened; Annual www.regulations.gov, and http:// Background Notice of Findings on Resubmitted endangered.fws.gov/candidates/ The Endangered Species Act of 1973, Petitions; Annual Description of index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Federal Register, 72 FR 36635; Centralized Library: U.S. Fish And
    Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules 36635 Dated: June 26, 2007. required to submit a copy of this Report FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Robert E. Roberts, and Order to GAO pursuant to the Bartel, Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish Regional Administrator, Region 8. Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES) [FR Doc. E7–13060 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am] 801(a)(1)(A), because the proposed rule (telephone 760–431–9440; facsimile BILLING CODE 6560–50–P is dismissed.) 760–431–5901). Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 (TDD) may call the Federal Information Radio, Radio broadcasting. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. COMMISSION Federal Communications Commission. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: John A. Karousos, Background 47 CFR Part 73 Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act (16 [DA 07–2651; MB Docket No. 05–191; RM– Bureau. U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that, for 11243] [FR Doc. E7–12860 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am] any petition to revise the List of BILLING CODE 6712–01–P Endangered and Threatened Wildlife or Radio Broadcasting Services; Elberton the List of Endangered and Threatened and Union Point, GA Plants that contains substantial AGENCY: Federal Communications DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR scientific and commercial information Commission. that listing may be warranted, we make Fish and Wildlife Service ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal. a finding within 12 months of
    [Show full text]
  • 11.0 Literature Cited
    Proposed Major Amendment to the Coachella Valley MSHCP – September 2013 11.0 Literature Cited 1. Aborn DA, and D. Froehlich. 1995. “An Observation of a Summer Tanager Attempting to Eat an Anolis Lizard.” Journal of Field Ornithology 66(4):501–502. 2. Aborn DA, and F.R. Moore. 1997. “Pattern of Movement by Summer Tanagers (Piranga rubra) During Migratory Stopover: A Telemetry Study.” Behavior 134(13–14):1077–100. 3. Abrams L. 1940. Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States: Washington, Oregon, and California. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. 4. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1996. “Le Conte's Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei).” Birds of North America 230:1–24. 5. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1996. “Summer Tanager: Piranga rubra.” Birds of North America 248:1–23. 6. Adams LW. 1984. “Small Mammal Use of an Interstate Highway Median Strip.” Journal of Applied Ecology 24:175–8. 7. Addicott JF, J.M. Aho, M.F. Antolin, D.K. Padilla, J.S. Richardson, and D.A. Soluk. 1987. “Ecological Neighborhoods: Scaling Environmental Patterns.” OIKOS 49:340–6. 8. Aigner PA, J. Tecklin, and C.E. Koehler. 1995. “Probable Breeding Population of the Black Rail in Yuba County, California.” Western Birds 26(3):157–60. 9. Akcakaya HR. 2000. “Conservation and Management for Multiple Species: Integrating Field Research and Modeling Into Management Decisions.” Environmental Management 26(1):S75–S83. 10. Akcakaya HR. 2000. “Viability Analyses with Habitat-based Metapopulation Models.” Population Ecology 42:45–53. 11. Akcakaya HR. 2001. “Linking Population-level Risk Assessment with Landscape and Habitat Models.” Science of the Total Environment 274:283–91.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy in the California Desert Mechanisms for Evaluating Solar Development on Public Lands
    Renewable Energy in the California Desert Mechanisms for Evaluating Solar Development on Public Lands By Jesse Fernandes Natalie Flynn Samantha Gibbes Matthew Griffis Takahiro Isshiki Sean Killian Laura Palombi Nerissa Rujanavech Sarah Tomsky Meredith Tondro A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Natural Resources and Environment) School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan April 2010 Faculty Advisor: Professor Steven Yaffee ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to express our sincere gratitude to our funders, who made this project possible: The Wilderness Society and Educational Foundation of America We would like to recognize and thank the many individuals who selflessly contributed their time and expertise, especially Alice Bond of The Wilderness Society. This project would have been nothing without your input and support. Thank you also to our advisor Professor Steve Yaffee for your valuable insight and feedback throughout this project. Lastly, we would like to thank our families and loved ones for their tireless patience and support through the whole of this sixteen-month process. www.snre.umich.edu/ecomgt/recd i TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. vi LIST OF MAPS ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • D1) Biological Resources Existing Conditions
    SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN DRAFT PEIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendices Appendix D: Biological Resources Existing Conditions Report June 2019 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYWIDE PLAN DRAFT PEIR COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks DRAFT San Bernardino Countywide Plan Biological Resources Existing Conditions Prepared for: County of San Bernardino Land Use Services Division, Advance Planning Division 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, 1st Floor San Bernardino, California 94215-0182 Contact: Terri Rahhal Prepared by: 3544 University Avenue Riverside, California 92501 Contact: Linda Archer DATA AND ANALYSIS AS NOVEMBER 2016 UPDATED WITH OUTREACH SUMMARY IN NOVEMBER 2018 DRAFTMAY 2019 D-1 REPORT USE, INTENT, AND LIMITATIONS This Background Report was prepared to inform the preparation of the Countywide Plan. This report is not intended to be continuously updated and may contain out-of-date material and information. This report reflects data collected in 2016 and analyzed in 2016 and 2017 as part of due diligence and issue identification. This report is not intended to be comprehensive and does not address all issues that were or could have been considered and discussed during the preparation of the Countywide Plan. Additionally, many other materials (reports, data, etc.) were used in the preparation of the Countywide Plan. This report is not intended to be a compendium of all reference materials. This report may be used to understand some of the issues considered and discussed during the preparation of the Countywide Plan, but should not be used as the sole reference for data or as confirmation of intended or desired policy direction. Final policy direction was subject to change based on additional input from the general public, stakeholders, and decision makers during regional outreach meetings, public review of the environmental impact report, and public adoption hearings.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Biodiversity of the Algodones Dunes of California
    Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e21715 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.5.e21715 Research Article Insect biodiversity of the Algodones Dunes of California Lynn S. Kimsey‡, Thomas J. Zavortink‡, Robert B. Kimsey‡, Steven L. Heydon‡ ‡ University of California, Davis, United States of America Corresponding author: Lynn S. Kimsey ([email protected]) Academic editor: Yasen Mutafchiev Received: 17 Oct 2017 | Accepted: 20 Nov 2017 | Published: 24 Nov 2017 Citation: Kimsey L, Zavortink T, Kimsey R, Heydon S (2017) Insect biodiversity of the Algodones Dunes of California. Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e21715. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e21715 Abstract Over a nine year period beginning in 2007 we surveyed the insects of the Algodones Dunes, Imperial Count, California, as part of a study undertaken for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. In a series of 22 collecting trips ranging in duration from 2 to 8 days we thus far have accumulated records of 1,840 species, 21 orders and 244 families from the dunes. Hymenoptera constituted the most diverse order, comprising about 45% of all the species recovered. Insect diversity and abundance peaked during the hottest part of the year between the months of May and September. Life history traits of the insects sampled included herbivores (29.6%), parasitoids (28.7%), predators (18.1%), pollen/nectar feeders (10.9%), detritivores (6.2%) and scavengers (2.4%). Seventy-nine or 4% of the insect species collected in the dunes have been solely recorded from there, and 3% of the species almost certainly derive from adjacent aquatic habitats or agricultural ecosystems, as their life histories could not be completed in Algodones Dunes habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Casey's June Beetle
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL ) Petition to Emergency-List DIVERSITY ) Casey’s June Beetle ) (Dinacoma caseyi Blaisdell 1930) SIERRA CLUB ) as a Federally Endangered Species ) DAVID H. WRIGHT, PH.D. ) ) Petitioners ) ) Photo by Dale Powell David H. Wright PhD. 1573 49th Street Sacramento, CA 95819 Center for Biological Diversity P.O. Box 493 Idyllwild, CA 92549 Sierra Club c/o Joan Taylor 1800 S. Sunrise Way Palm Springs, CA 92264 May 11, 2004 Petition to list Casey’s June Beetle as a Federally Endangered Species The Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, and David H. Wright, Ph.D., hereby formally petition the Secretary of Interior (Secretary) to list Casey’s June beetle, Dinacoma caseyi Blaisdell 1930 (hereafter, Casey’s June beetle or “the beetle”), as endangered pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. (hereafter "the Act"). This petition is filed under 5 U.S.C. 553 (e) and 50 CFR 424.14 (1990), which grant interested parties the right to petition for issue of a rule from the Secretary of the Interior. Critical Habitat Petitioners also note that critical habitat should be designated for the beetle concurrent with final listing, consistent with 50 CFR 424.12, and pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. 553). We note that species with designated critical habitat are in better recovery status than species without (Rachlinski 1997, http://www.nativeecosystems.org/criticalhabitat/Critical_Habitat_Fact_Sheet_May_2003. pdf , http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/swcbd/programs/policy/ch/sub1.html). Emergency Listing Because of the extremely limited range of the species and extraordinary imminent threats to its continued existence, we strongly urge the Secretary and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapulines, Langostas, Grillos Y Esperanzas De México Chapulines, Langostas
    GRASSHOPPERS, CHAPULINES, LANGOSTAS, LOCUSTS, CRICKETS GRILLOS Y ESPERANZAS & KATYDIDS DE MÉXICO OF MEXICO GUÍA FOTOGRÁFICA PHOTOGRAPHIC GUIDE CHAPULINES, LANGOSTAS, GRILLOS Y ESPERANZAS DE MÉXICO CHAPULINES, LANGOSTAS, ISSN 1973-7815 ISBN 978-88-903323-0-2 Paolo Fontana, Filippo Maria Buzzetti, Ricardo Mariño-Pérez Paolo Fontana, Filippo Maria Buzzetti, Ricardo Mariño-Pérez Edited by World Biodiversity Association onlus ©2008 Verona - Italy WBA HANDBOOKS 1 WBA HANDBOOKS 1 CHAPULINES, LANGOSTAS, GRILLOS Y ESPERANZAS DE MÉXICO GUÍA FOTOGRÁFICA GRASSHOPPERS, LOCUSTS, CRICKETS & KATYDIDS OF MEXICO PHOTOGRAPHIC GUIDE PAOLO FONTANA, FILIPPO MARIA BUZZETTI, RICARDO MARIÑO-PÉREZ 2. Biologia Centrali Americana. Insecta. Orthoptera, Vol. I, Tab. 21. 11 9 10 11 12 9-12. Algunos hábitats de México: matorral xerófilo (9), pastizal (10) , bosque de coníferas y encinos (11) y bos- que tropical perennifolio (12). – Some Mexican Habitat: thorn Scrub (9), grassland (10), pine-oak forest (11) and tropical rain forest (12). 23 Ciclo biológico Life Cycle Los estados de desarrollo de los ortópteros son el The development stages of Orthoptera are the egg, huevo, ninfa (figs. 13-14) (antes de ninfa, un periodo nymph (figs. 13-14) (before becoming a nymph, they corto en forma de gusano o vermiforme) y adulto go through a short period as larva (vermiform)), and (conocido como imago cuando recién ha mudado). adult (a newly emerged adult is known as an imago). Normalmente las hembras de Caelifera entierran los Females of Caelifera usually bury their eggs in the huevos en el suelo con ayuda del ovipositor, mien- ground, whereas females of Ensifera deposit their tras que las hembras de Ensifera depositan los hue- eggs within stems, leaves or roots, or they attach the vos en los tallos, hojas o raíces, o bien, los pegan a las eggs to stems or branches (Rentz and Ning Su, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    Friday J uary 6, 1989 MEN Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Animal Notice of Review • 554 Federal Register / Vol. 54, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 1989 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Regional Director (FWE/SE), U.S. Fish least at times, to merit conSideration for and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, addition to the List of Endangered and Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 (505/ Threatened Wildlife. The accompanying 766-2321 or FTS 474-2321). table identifies many of these taxa 50 CFR Part 17 Region 3. Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, (including, by definition, biological Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, subspecies and certain populations of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Wisconsin. vertebrate animals) and assigns each to and Plants; Animal Notice of Review Regional Director (AE/SE), U.S. Fish one of the three categories described AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, and Wildlife Service, Federal Building, below. Unless it is the subject of a Interior. Fort Snelling, Twin Cities, Minnesota current published proposed or final rule 55111 (612/725-3276 or FTS 725-3276). determining endangered or threatened Notice of review. ACTION: Region 4. Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, status, none of these taxa receives Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, SUMMARY: The Service issues a revised substantive or procedural protection notice identifying vertebrate and Mississippi, North Carolina, South pursuant to the Act (those species that invertebrate animal taxa, native to the Carolina, Tennessee, Puerto Rico, and are the subject of a proposed or final the Virgin Islands.
    [Show full text]