DOCSLIB.ORG

Animal Candidate Review for Listing As Endangered Or Threatened

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Animal Candidate Review for Listing As Endangered Or Threatened 58982 Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 15, 1994 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OFTHE INTERIOR ADDRESSES: Interested persons or Street, Anchorage. Alaska 99501 (907— organizations should submit comments 786—3605). Fish and Wildlife Service regarding particular taxa to the Regional FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director of the Region specified with Jamie Rappaport Clark, Chief, Division 5OCFRPartI7 each taxon as having the lead of Endangered Species (703—358—2171) Endangered and Threatened Wildlife responsibility for that taxon. Comments or Endangered Species Coordinator(s) in and Plants; Animal Candidate Review of a more general nature maybe the appropriate Regional Office(s) listed for Listing as Endangered or submitted to: Chief—Division of above. Endangered Species, U.S. Fish and Threatened Species SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Wildlife Service, Mail Stop 452 ARLSQ AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington. D.C. 20240. Written Background Interior. comments and materials received in The Endangered Species Act (16 ACTION: Notice of review. response to this notice will be available U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires the for public inspection by appointment in Secretary of the Interior (or Commerce SL.YMARY: In this notice the U.S. Fish the Regional Offices listed below. according to vested program and Wildlife Service (Service) presents Region 1.—California, Hawaii, Idaho, responsibilities) to determine whether an updated compilation of vertebrate Nevada, Oregon, Washington, wildlife and plant species are and iA~vertebrateanimal taxa native to Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana endangered or threatened, based on the the United States that are being Islands, and Pacific Territories of the best available scientific and commercial reviewed for possible addition to the United States. data, after conducting a review of their List of Endangered and Threatened Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and status. In regulations found at 50 CFR ~Vildlife under the Endangered Species Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal 424.15 the Service advises that it may Ac~of 1973, as amended (Act). Such Complex. 911 N.E. 11th Avenue. publish comprehensive notices of such taxa are generally referred to as listing Portland, Oregon 97232-4181 (503— review. These notices contain the names car.didates (candidates). The changes in 231—6241). of the species considered to be this document from previous animal Region 2.—Arizona. New Mexico, candidates for listing under the Act and notices of review primarily involve: (1) Oklahoma. and Texas. indicate whether sufficient scientific or the addition of new candidate taxa; (2) Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and commercial information is available to changes in category fcx some Wildlife Service. P.O. Box 1306, warrant proposing to list them. They ca~cd~dates;(3j additions and deletions Albuquerque. NewMexico 87103 (505— also solicit additional information in State historic distributions; and (4) 766—3972). regarding any of the species mentioned. changes in stamus trend for some Region 3—Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, The Service has for many years been cand.date taxa. Procedures initiated in Michigan. Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, gathering data on taxa of animals native the orevious animal notice of revie* and Wisconsin. to the United States that appeared. at (November 21, 1991, 56 FR 58804) that Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and least at times, to merit consideration for are being continued include: (1) a Wildlife Service. Federal Building, Fort addition to the List of Endangered and category (PE or PT) for species that are Snelling. Twin Cities. Minnesota 55111 Threatened Wildlife. The accompanying currently proposed for listing under the (612—725—3276). table identifies many of these taxa Act; (2) alphabetical organization by Region 4.—Alabama. Arkansas, (including, by definition, biological sc:er.ific name of taxa under each ma)or subspecies and certain distinct gro~:pheading (class or order) identified Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi. North Carolina, South population segments of vertebrate in previous nc~ices:(3) the omission of animals) and assigns each taxon to one taxa that have been identified as non- Carolina. Tennessee, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. of the categories described below. In candidates in previous notices; and (4) revising this compilation the Service identification of a Fish and Wildlife Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1875 Century relies on information from status Service Region with lead responsibility surveys conducted for candidate for each taxon. While it is prudent to Boulevard. Atlanta. Georgia 30303 (404— 679—7103). assessment and on other information take candidate taxa into account during from State Heritage Programs, from Region 5—Connecticut, Delaware, environmental plannirg, neither the other State and Federal Agencies (such substantive nor procedural provisions of District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, as the Forest Service and the Bureau of the Act apply to ataxon that is Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Land Management), from designated as a candidate. (Species that Jersey. New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode knowledgeable scientists, and from have been proposed for listing are Island. Vermont, Virginia. and West comments received in response to covered b~’the conference procedure of Virginia. previous notices of review. Seclon 7(a)(4) of the Act). Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Unless it is the subject of a current Through the publication of this Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center published proposed rule to determine nutice, the Service also requests any Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts 01035— endangered or threatened status, none of additional status information that may 9589 (413—253—8615). these taxa receives substantive or be available. This information will be Region 6.—Colorado, Kansas, procedural protection pursuant to the considered in preparing listing Montana. Nebraska, North Dakota, Act (species that are the subject of a dcx urnents and future revisions and/or South Dakota, Utah. and Wyoming. final listing rule are removed from this supplements to the notice of review. It Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and table at each periodic updating). The ~viIIalso assist the Service in Wildlife Service. P.O. Box 25486. Act requires, however, monitoring the monitoring changes in the status of Denver Federal Center, Denver, status of certain candidate taxa to listing candidates. Colorado 80225 (303—236—7398). prevent their extinction while awaiting DATE: Comments are requested until the Region 7.—Alaska. listing decisions. The Service intends to publication of an update of this notice, Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and monitor the status of all listing anticipated in 1996. ~Vi1dlifeService, lOll East Tudor candidates to the fullest extent possible. Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 219 / Tuesday, November 15, 1994 1 Proposed Rules 58983 emphasizing monitoTing of species for Codes for the maiorstatus categories 3A—Taxa for which the Service has which available scientific and of taxa in the first column of the table persuasive evidence of extinction. If commercial information indicates areexplained below: rediscovered, such taxa might acquire imminent threat (see the listing priority PE—Taxa already proposed to be high priority for listing. At this time, guidelines published September 21, listed as endangered. however, thebest available information 1983, 48 FR 43098). PT—Taxa already proposed to be indicates that the taxa in this listed as threatened. subcategory, or the habitats from which Many of the taxa in the accompanying 1—Taxa for which the Service has on table were covered in the Service’s they were known, have been lost. file stifficient information on biological previous animal notices of review. The 3B—Nanies that, on the basis of vulnerability and threat(s) to support current ta.xonornic understanding preceding animal notice of review was proposals to list them as endangered or (usually as represented in published published in the FEDERAL REGISTER of threatened species. Proposed rules have revisions and monographs), do not November 21, 1991 (56 FR 58804— not yet been issued because this action represent distinct taxa meeting the Act’s 58836). Previous to that a is precluded at present by other listing comprehensive animal notice was definition of “species”; it also includes activity. In accordance with the policy vertebrate populations that do not meet published January 6, 1989 (54 FR 554— announced in a statement published 579), with minor corrections on August this definition. Such supposed entities May 12, 1993 (58 FR 28034—28035), all could be reevaluated in the future on 10. 1989 154 FR 32.833). Earlier species that have been the subject of a thebasis ofnew information. comprehensive reviews for vertebrate petition determination of “warranted 3C—Taxa that have proven to be inure animals were published on September but precluded” for listing are abundant or wide~preadthan previously 18, 1985 (50 FR 37958—37967), and on automatically assigned to Category 1 of believed andJor those that are not December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58454— the nex’t comprehensive notice of review subject to any identifiable threat. lf 58460). An initial comprehensive unless they areproposed or determined further research or changes in habitat review for invertebrate animals was to be “not warranted” in the interim. conditions indicate a significant de.clim published May 22, 1984 (49FR 21664— Development and publication
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Two Additional Invasive Scarabaeoid Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) in Hawaii
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Entomology Museum, University of Nebraska State 12-2009 Two Additional Invasive Scarabaeoid Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) in Hawaii Mary Liz Jameson Wichita State University, [email protected] Darcy E. Oishi 2Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Plant Pest Control Branch, Honolulu, [email protected] Brett C. Ratcliffe University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Grant T. McQuate USDA-ARS-PBARC, U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Hilo, HI, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers Part of the Entomology Commons Jameson, Mary Liz; Oishi, Darcy E.; Ratcliffe, Brett C.; and McQuate, Grant T., "Two Additional Invasive Scarabaeoid Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) in Hawaii" (2009). Papers in Entomology. 147. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/147 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. AProcddition. HawaiianAl inv AEsiventomol scA.r SAocbs. in(2009) HAwA 41:25–30ii 25 Two Additional Invasive Scarabaeoid Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) in Hawaii Mary Liz Jameson1, Darcy E. Oishi2, Brett C. Ratcliffe3, and Grant T. McQuate4 1Wichita State University, Department of Biological Sciences, 537 Hubbard Hall, Wichita, Kansas 67260 [email protected]; 2Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Plant Pest Control Branch, 1428 South King St., Honolulu, HI 96814 [email protected]; 3University of Nebraska State Museum, Systematics Research Collections, W436 Nebraska Hall, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 [email protected]; 4USDA-ARS-PBARC, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Supervised and Unsupervised Discovery of Structures in Large Data Archives Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/48b029zq Author Hao, Yuan Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Supervised and Unsupervised Discovery of Structures in Large Data Archives A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science by Yuan Hao March 2014 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Eamonn Keogh, Chairperson Dr. Neal Young Dr. Marek Chrobak Dr. Christian Shelton Copyright by Yuan Hao 2014 The Dissertation of Yuan Hao is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements Many people have helped me during the past couple of years. My greatest and sincerest gratitude goes to my advisor Dr. Eamonn Keogh for his guidance and patience. He brought me on a wonderful journey at University of California, Riverside and I will never forget the past four years, which has allowed me to learn from scratch and consistently improve. My work and even my life were deeply influenced by his enthusiasm, passion, and hard-working attitude in research. Eamonn, thank you for giving me an opportunity to work with you and I will always remember the following lessons I have learned from you: Always try simple ideas first, demonstrate ideas more expressively (through visualization), less tuning of algorithms, and take a more general approach to easily allow others to reproduce/extend your work. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all my committee members as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Fen Communitynorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1
    Northern Fen CommunityNorthern Abstract Fen, Page 1 Community Range Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Absent or likely absent Photo by Joshua G. Cohen Overview: Northern fen is a sedge- and rush-dominated 8,000 years. Expansion of peatlands likely occurred wetland occurring on neutral to moderately alkaline following climatic cooling, approximately 5,000 years saturated peat and/or marl influenced by groundwater ago (Heinselman 1970, Boelter and Verry 1977, Riley rich in calcium and magnesium carbonates. The 1989). community occurs north of the climatic tension zone and is found primarily where calcareous bedrock Several other natural peatland communities also underlies a thin mantle of glacial drift on flat areas or occur in Michigan and can be distinguished from shallow depressions of glacial outwash and glacial minerotrophic (nutrient-rich) northern fens, based on lakeplains and also in kettle depressions on pitted comparisons of nutrient levels, flora, canopy closure, outwash and moraines. distribution, landscape context, and groundwater influence (Kost et al. 2007). Northern fen is dominated Global and State Rank: G3G5/S3 by sedges, rushes, and grasses (Mitsch and Gosselink 2000). Additional open wetlands occurring on organic Range: Northern fen is a peatland type of glaciated soils include coastal fen, poor fen, prairie fen, bog, landscapes of the northern Great Lakes region, ranging intermittent wetland, and northern wet meadow. Bogs, from Michigan west to Minnesota and northward peat-covered wetlands raised above the surrounding into central Canada (Ontario, Manitoba, and Quebec) groundwater by an accumulation of peat, receive inputs (Gignac et al. 2000, Faber-Langendoen 2001, Amon of nutrients and water primarily from precipitation et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Documentation
    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Primary Types of the Hawaiian Stag Beetle Genus
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 433: 77–88A review (2014) of the primary types of the Hawaiian stag beetle genus Apterocyclus... 77 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.433.8022 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A review of the primary types of the Hawaiian stag beetle genus Apterocyclus Waterhouse (Coleoptera, Lucanidae, Lucaninae), with the description of a new species M.J. Paulsen1, David C. Hawks2 1 Systematics Research Collections, University of Nebraska State Museum, W436 Nebraska Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588-0546 USA 2 Department of Entomology, University of California- Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521 USA Corresponding author: M.J. Paulsen ([email protected]) Academic editor: Andrey Frolov | Received 3 June 2014 | Accepted 31 July 2014 | Published 13 August 2014 http://zoobank.org/065CFC3A-4DD8-4759-B55D-040FCC3351AA Citation: Paulsen MJ, Hawks DC (2014) A review of the primary types of the Hawaiian stag beetle genus Apterocyclus Waterhouse (Coleoptera, Lucanidae, Lucaninae), with the description of a new species. ZooKeys 433: 77–88. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.433.8022 Abstract The species of the Hawaiian stag beetle genus Apterocyclus Waterhouse (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) are re- viewed following an examination of all primary types. Although the continued existence of the species is unknown and some possibly are extinct there are five recently extant species, including one species that is described here as new. The holotypes for all available names are pictured, and synonymies discussed and updated. Lectotypes are designated for Apterocyclus honoluluensis Waterhouse and A. munroi Sharp. A key to species and a revised catalog for the genus are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Tracking List
    Nevada Division of Natural Heritage Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 5002, Carson City, Nevada 89701-5245 voice: (775) 684-2900 | fax: (775) 684-2909 | web: heritage.nv.gov At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List July 2021 The Nevada Division of Natural Heritage (NDNH) A separate list, the Plant and Animal Watch List, systematically curates information on Nevada's contains taxa that could become at-risk in the future. endangered, threatened, sensitive, rare, and at-risk plants and animals providing the most comprehensive Taxa on the At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List are source of information on Nevada’s imperiled organized by taxonomic group, and presented biodiversity. alphabetically by scientific name within each group. Currently, there are 639 Tracking List taxa: 285 plants, Nevada's health and economic well-being depend 209 invertebrates, 65 fishes, 9 amphibians, 7 reptiles, upon its biodiversity and wise land stewardship. This 27 birds, and 37 mammals. challenge increases as population and land-use pressures continue to grow. Nevada is among the top Documentation of population status, locations, or 10 states for both the diversity and the vulnerability of other updates or corrections for any of the taxa on its living heritage. With early planning and responsible this list are always welcome. Literature citations with development, economic growth and our biological taxonomic revisions and descriptions of new taxa are resources can coexist. NDNH is a central source for also appreciated. The Nevada Native Species Site information critical to achieving this balance. Survey Report form is available on our website under Management priorities for the state’s imperiled the Submit Data tab and is the preferred format for biodiversity are continually assessed, providing submitting information to NDNH.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Page
    BIOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY FOR WOODVILLE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT’S WATER WELL REPLACEMENT PROJECT ( NEAR WOODVILLE, TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ) Prepared for Woodville Public Utility District P.O. Box 4567 16716 Avenue 168 Woodville, CA 93258 (559) 686-9649 September 2019 Prepared by HALSTEAD & ASSOCIATES Environmental / Biological Consultants 296 Burgan Avenue, Clovis, CA 93611 Office (559) 298-2334; Mobile (559) 970-2875 Fax (559) 322-0769; [email protected] Table of Contents Page 1. Summary ..............................................................................................................................1 2. Background ..........................................................................................................................2 3. Project Location ...................................................................................................................2 4. Project Description...............................................................................................................2 5. Project Site Description .......................................................................................................2 6. Regulatory Overview ...........................................................................................................3 7. Survey Methods ...................................................................................................................7 8. Wildlife Resources in the Project Area ................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera (Heteroptera/Homoptera) As Prey of Robber Flies (Diptera: Asilidae) with Unpublished Records
    J. Ent. Res. Soc., 12(1): 27-47, 2010 ISSN:1302-0250 Hemiptera (Heteroptera/Homoptera) as Prey of Robber Flies (Diptera: Asilidae) with Unpublished Records D. Steve DENNIS1 Robert J. LAVIGNE2 Jeanne G. DENNIS3 11105 Myrtle Wood Drive, St. Augustine, Florida 32086, USA e-mail: [email protected] 2Honorary Research Associate. Entomology, South Australia Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, AUSTRALIA and Professor Emeritus, Entomology, Department of Renewable Resources, College of Agriculture, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82070, USA e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] 3P.O. Box 861161, St. Augustine, Florida 32086, USA, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Of the approximately 58,000 plus prey records in the Asilidae Predator-Prey Database, 9.1% are Hemiptera (3.5% Heteroptera and 5.6% Homoptera). Forty six of the 133 recognized worldwide Hemiptera families are preyed upon with generally more prey records for female than male robber flies. Potential explanations for robber flies, in particular females, preying upon Hemiptera are discussed. Numbers of Hemiptera prey are examined based on their associated families, genera and species. Hemiptera prey are also discussed in relation to robber fly subfamilies and genera. New records of Hemiptera prey are presented and compared with prey records in the Database. Keywords: Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Homoptera, prey, robber flies, Diptera, Asilidae INTRODUCTION The Hemiptera, the largest order of hemimetabolous insects consisting of approximately 70,000 to 80,000 plus described species (Meyer, 2008), occur worldwide. Traditionally the Hemiptera are divided into two suborders, the Heteroptera and Homoptera, although some taxonomists believe that the Coleorrhyncha, Stenorrhyncha and Auchenorryncha also are suborders.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Appendices
    List of Appendices Scroll down to view the Appendices Appendix A - Compatibility Determinations Appendix B - Technical Panel Appendix C - Environmental Assessment Appendix D - Response to Comments Appendix E - Wilderness Review Appendix F - Plant List Appendix G - Bird List Appendix H - Fish List Appendix I - Insect List Appendix J - Fire Management Plan Appendix K - Glossary Appendix A Compatibility Determinations Appendix A - Compatibility Determinations Compatibility Determination Use: Environmental Education, Interpretation, Wildlife Observation, and Photography Refuge Name: Antioch Dunes National Wildlife Refuge, Contra Costa County, adjacent to Antioch, California; a unit of Don Edwards San Francisco Bay NWR Complex. Establishing and Acquisition Authority: Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 - 1544) Refuge Purpose: “... to conserve (A) fish or wildlife which are listed as endangered species or threatened species... or (B) plants...” (Endangered Species Act of 1973) National Wildlife Refuge System Mission: The mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System is “to administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management, and where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans.” (National Wildlife Refuge Administration Act of 1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee]). Description of Use(s): Environmental education, interpretation, wildlife observation, and photography are priority public uses of the National Wildlife Refuge System. As proposed, they would occur from outside the protective fence or under controlled visits inside the protective fence since the Refuge is otherwise closed to the public. Antioch Dunes NWR provides an opportunity for increasing awareness of the two endangered plants and one endangered insect species on the Refuge through guided tours and interpretive programs and information.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules
    7596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR appointment in the Regional Offices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed below. Fish and Wildlife Service Information relating to particular taxa Background in this notice may be obtained from the The Endangered Species Act (Act) of 50 CFR Part 17 Service's Endangered Species 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531 et Coordinator in the lead Regional Office seq.) requires the Service to identify Endangered and Threatened Wildlife identified for each taxon and listed species of wildlife and plants that are and Plants; Review of Plant and below: endangered or threatened, based on the Animal Taxa That Are Candidates for Region 1. California, Commonwealth best available scientific and commercial Listing as Endangered or Threatened of the Northern Mariana Islands, information. As part of the program to Species Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific accomplish this, the Service has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Territories of the United States, and maintained a list of species regarded as Interior. Washington. candidates for listing. The Service maintains this list for a variety of ACTION: Notice of review. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal reasons, includingÐto provide advance SUMMARY: In this notice the Fish and Complex, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, knowledge of potential listings that Wildlife Service (Service) presents an Portland, Oregon 97232±4181 (503± could affect decisions of environmental updated list of plant and animal taxa 231±6131). planners and developers; to solicit input native to the United States that are Region 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee-Alabama-Georgia (TAG) Cave Teaching and Learning Module
    Tennessee-Alabama-Georgia (TAG) Cave Teaching and Learning Module K. Denise Kendall, Ph.D. Matthew L. Niemiller, Ph.D. Annette S. Engel, Ph.D. Funding provided by 1 Dear Educator, We are pleased to present you with a TAG (Tennessee – Alabama – Georgia) cave-themed teaching and learning module. This module aims to engage Kindergarten through 5th grade students in subterranean biology, while fostering awareness and positive attitudes toward cave biodiversity. We have chosen cave fauna for this teaching module because students have a fascination with atypical organisms and environments. Moreover, little attention has been given to subterranean biodiversity in public outreach programs. Many students will likely be intrigued by the unique fauna and composition of subterranean landscapes. Therefore, we hope these lessons enable teachers to introduce students to the unique organisms and habitat below their feet. The module presents students with background information and outlines lessons that aim to reinforce and discover aspects of the content. Lessons in this module focus primarily on habitat formation, biodiversity, evolution, and system flows in subterranean landscapes. We intend for this module to be a guide, and, thus, we have included baseline material and activity plans. Teachers are welcome to use the lessons in any order they wish, use portions of lessons, and may modify the lessons as they please. Furthermore, educators may share these lessons with other school districts and teachers; however, please do not receive monetary gain for lessons in the module. Funding for the TAG Cave module has been graciously provided by the Cave Conservation Foundation, a non-profit 501(c)3 organization dedicated to promoting and facilitating the conservation, management, and knowledge of cave and karst resources.
    [Show full text]