DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Friday J uary 6, 1989 MEN Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Animal Notice of Review • 554 Federal Register / Vol. 54, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 1989 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Regional Director (FWE/SE), U.S. Fish least at times, to merit conSideration for and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, addition to the List of Endangered and Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 (505/ Threatened Wildlife. The accompanying 766-2321 or FTS 474-2321). table identifies many of these taxa 50 CFR Part 17 Region 3. Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, (including, by definition, biological Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, subspecies and certain populations of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Wisconsin. vertebrate animals) and assigns each to and Plants; Animal Notice of Review Regional Director (AE/SE), U.S. Fish one of the three categories described AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, and Wildlife Service, Federal Building, below. Unless it is the subject of a Interior. Fort Snelling, Twin Cities, Minnesota current published proposed or final rule 55111 (612/725-3276 or FTS 725-3276). determining endangered or threatened Notice of review. ACTION: Region 4. Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, status, none of these taxa receives Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, SUMMARY: The Service issues a revised substantive or procedural protection notice identifying vertebrate and Mississippi, North Carolina, South pursuant to the Act (those species that invertebrate animal taxa, native to the Carolina, Tennessee, Puerto Rico, and are the subject of a proposed or final the Virgin Islands. U.S., being considered for possible rule are removed from this list at each Regional Director (FWE), U.S. Fish addition to the List of Endangered and periodic updating). and Wildlife Service, The Richard B. Threatened Wildlife. The Service Category 1 in this list comprises taxa Russell Federal Building, Suite 1276,75 for which the Service currently has emphasizes that this notice is not a Spring Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia proposal for such addition and that the substantial information on hand to 30303 (404/221-3583 or FTS 242-3583). support the biological appropriateness involved taxa do not receive substantive Region 5. Connecticut, Delaware, or procedural protection pursuant to the of proposing to list as endangered or District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, threatened. Proposed rules have not yet Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New amended, as a result of this action. The been issued because they have been Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode precluded at present by other listing Service does, however, encourage Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Federal agencies and other appropriate activity. Development and publication of Virginia. proposed rules on these taxa are parties to take these taxa into account in Regional Director (FWE), U.S. Fish anticipated, however, and the Service environmental planning. Also identified and Wildlife Service, Suite 700, One encourages Federal agencies and other in this notice (in "category 3") are Gateway Center, Newton Corner, appropriate parties to give consideration animal taxa that were previously under Massachusetts 02158 (617/965-5100 ext. to such taxa in environmental planning. consideration for listing, but that are 316 or FTS 829-9316). currently presumed either to be extinct, Region 6. Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Category 2 comprises taxa for which to not be valid species or subspecies, or Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, information now in possession of the to be more abundant and/or widespread Utah, and Wyoming. Service indicates that proposing to list than previously thought, and not subject Regional Director (FWE), U.S. Fish as endangered or threatened is possibly to substantial threats to their continued and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486, appropriate, but for which conclusive existence. Denver Federal Center, Denver, data on biological vulnerability and threat are not currently available to Comments may be submitted Colorado 80225 (303/236-7398 or FTS DATES: support proposed rules. The Service until further notice. 776-7398). emphasizes that these taxa are not being Interested parties are Region 7. Alaska. ADDRESSES: Regional Director (FWE), U.S. Fish proposed for listing by this notice, and requested to submit comments to the and Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor that there are not specific plans for such appropriate Regional Director(s) listed Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 (907/ proposals unless additional information below or to: Director (AFWE), U.S. Fish 786-3505 or FTS 786-3505). becomes available. Further biological and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC research and field study may be needed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 20240. Comments and materials relating to ascertain the status of taxa in this to this notice will be available for public Endangered Species Coordinator(s) in the appropriate Regional Office(s), or category, and it is likely that many will inspection, by appointment, in the be found not to warrant listing. The Regional Offices listed below and in the Mr. William Knapp, Chief, Division of Endangered Species and Habitat Service hopes that this notice will Division of Endangered Species and encourage investigation of the status Habitat Conservation, 1000 North Glebe Conservation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC 20240 (703/ and vulnerability of these taxa, and Road, Arlington, Virginia. Information consideration of them in the course of relating to particular taxa may be 235-2771 or FTS 235-2771). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: environmental planning. obtained from the Endangered Species Category 3 comprises taxa that were Coordinator(s) in the appropriate Background once being considered for listing as Regional Offices, as listed below: The Endangered Species Act of 1973, endangered or threatened, but are not Region 1. California, Hawaii, Idaho, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) currently receiving such consideration. Nevada, Oregon, Washington, American requires determination of whether These taxa are included in one of the Samoa, Commonwealth of the Northern species of wildlife and plants are following three subcategories. Mariana Islands, Guam, and Trust endangered or threatened based on the Subcategory 3A comprises taxa for Territory of the Pacific Islands. best available scientific and commercial which the Service has persuasive Regional Director (FWE-SE), U.S. Fish data. For many years, the U.S. Fish and evidence of extinction. If rediscovered, and Wildlife Service, Lloyd 500 Building, Wildlife Service has been gathering data however, such taxa might warrant high Suite 1692,500 NE. Multnomah Street, on taxa of animals (fishes, amphibians, priority for addition to the List of Portland, Oregon 97232 (503/231-6150 or reptiles, birds, mammals, sponges, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. FTS 429-6150). crustaceans, arachnids, insects, snails, Subcategory 3B comprises names that, Region 2. Arizona, New Mexico, and bivalve mollusks), native to the on the basis of current taxonomic Oklahoma, and Texas. United States, that have appeared, at understanding, usually as represented in Federal Register / Vol. 54, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 1989 / Proposed Rules 555 published revisions and monographs, do The Service intends to consider all use; some have been standardized by not represent taxa meeting the data received in response to this notice, professional committees of specialists. Endangered Species Act's legal to make appropriate amendments to the In some groups whose systematics most definition of species; it also includes accompanying table, and to indicate need revision the vernacular, names are vertebrate populations that do not meet intentions with regard to future listing about as informative as the current this definition. Future investigation actions. Substantive changes in status scientific name. Many taxa are obscure, could lead to reevaluation of the listing may be announced by periodic notices which almost guarantees that no name qualifications of such entities. in the Federal Register. has much history of use. Group names Subcategory 3C comprises taxa that Vertebrates are listed first in the such as snail, amphipod, col dragonfly are now considered to be more accompanying table, followed by have been appended to common names abundant and/or widespread than invertebrates. Each of these is arranged to clarify distinctions from other • in a general systematic order, from previously thought. Should new invertebrates or plants with similar or information suggest that any such taxon fishes to mammals in the vertebrates is experiencing a numerical or and from sponges to mollusks in the confusing names; such extra qualifiers distributional decline, or is under a invertebrates. Classes of vertebrates would probably be dropped from any substantial threat, it may be considered have separate headings, invertebrates name that came into truly common for transfer to category 1 or 2. headings reflect recognizable or usage. Some changes or simplifications Many of the taxa in the accompanying convenient groups at the level of Order will be noted from names used in table were also covered by the Service's or above. For each taxon, the assigned previous versions of these tables. previous reviews: For vertebrates the category appears on the left, followed Continuity in the scientific name should preceding review was published in the by the
Recommended publications
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment

    Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment

    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
  • Springs Distribution, Flow, and Associated Species in the Verde River Basin, Arizona

    Springs Distribution, Flow, and Associated Species in the Verde River Basin, Arizona

    --- Springs of the Verde River Basin --- Springs Distribution, Flow, and Associated Species in the Verde River Basin, Arizona This document was created by: Springs Stewardship Institute Museum of Northern Arizona 3101 N. Fort Valley Dr. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Under contract to: One for the Verde P.O. Box 2535 Cottonwood, AZ 86326 10/31/2018 Recommended Citation: Schenk, E.R.; Jenness, J.S.; and Stevens, L.E. 2018. Springs Distribution, Flow, and Associated Species in the Verde River Basin, Arizona. Springs Stewardship Institute Technical Report to One for the Verde. Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff, AZ. 47 p. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27113.95846 Springs Distribution, Flow, and Springs-dependent Species in the Verde River Basin, Arizona Edward R. Schenk, Jeff S. Jenness, and Lawrence E. Stevens Springs Stewardship Institute Museum of Northern Arizona 3101 N. Fort Valley Dr. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 10/31/2018 Contents Executive Summary: .................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 The Springs Stewardship Institute and Springs Online ..................................................... 7 Methods ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Results .........................................................................................................................................
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016

    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016

    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
  • Estimating the Energy Expenditure of Endotherms at the Species Level

    Estimating the Energy Expenditure of Endotherms at the Species Level

    Canadian Journal of Zoology Estimating the energy expenditure of endotherms at the species level Journal: Canadian Journal of Zoology Manuscript ID cjz-2020-0035 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 17-Feb-2020 Author: Complete List of Authors: McNab, Brian; University of Florida, Biology Is your manuscript invited for consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue?: Draft arvicoline rodents, BMR, Anatidae, energy expenditure, endotherms, Keyword: Meliphagidae, Phyllostomidae © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 42 Canadian Journal of Zoology Estimating the energy expenditure of endotherms at the species level Brian K. McNab B.K. McNab, Department of Biology, University of Florida 32611 Email for correspondence: [email protected] Telephone number: 1-352-392-1178 Fax number: 1-352-392-3704 The author has no conflict of interest Draft © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Zoology Page 2 of 42 McNab, B.K. Estimating the energy expenditure of endotherms at the species level. Abstract The ability to account with precision for the quantitative variation in the basal rate of metabolism (BMR) at the species level is explored in four groups of endotherms, arvicoline rodents, ducks, melaphagid honeyeaters, and phyllostomid bats. An effective analysis requires the inclusion of the factors that distinguish species and their responses to the conditions they encounter in the environment. These factors are implemented by changes in body composition and are responsible for the non-conformity of species to a scaling curve. Two concerns may limit an analysis. The factors correlatedDraft with energy expenditure often correlate with each other, which usually prevents them from being included together in an analysis, thereby preventing a complete analysis, implying the presence of factors other than mass.
  • Upper Basin Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Workgroup Annual Report

    Upper Basin Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Workgroup Annual Report

    UPPER BASIN PALLID STURGEON RECOVERY WORKGROUP 2004 ANNUAL REPORT Upper Basin Pallid Sturgeon Workgroup c/o Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks 1420 East Sixth Helena MT 59620 August 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION WORKGROUP MEETING NOTES 2004 Annual Meeting Notes – December 1-2, 2004 .............................................................5 March 9, 2005 Meeting Notes ...............................................................................................21 WORKGROUP LETTERS AND DOCUMENTS Intake BOR Letter..................................................................................................................29 Garrison Review Team Report Submission Letter to USFWS..............................................31 Review of pallid sturgeon culture at Garrison Dam NFH by the Upper Basin Pallid Sturgeon Review Team, March, 2005 ..............................................................36 RESEARCH AND MONITORING 2004 Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Efforts in the Upper Missouri River, Montana (RPMA #1), Bill Gardner, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Lewistown, MT...................49 Habitat Use, Diet, and Growth of Hatchery-reared Juvenile Pallid Sturgeon And Indigenous shovelnose sturgeon in the Missouri River avove Fort Peck Reservoir, Montana, Paul C. Gerrity, Christopher S. Guy, and William M. Gardner, Montana Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Montana State University.............................65 Lower Missouri and Yellowstone Rivers Pallid Sturgeon Study, 2004 Report, Mtthew M. Klungle and Matthew W. Baxter, Montana
  • Endangered Species

    Endangered Species

    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
  • An Evaluation of the Wetland and Upland Habitats And

    An Evaluation of the Wetland and Upland Habitats And

    AN EVALUATION OF THE WETLAND AND UPLAND HABITATS AND ASSOCIATED WILDLIFE RESOURCES IN SOUTHERN CANAAN VALLEY CANAAN VALLEY TASK FORCE SUBMl'l*IED BY: EDWIN D. MICHAEL, PH.D. PROFESSOR OF WILDLIFEMANAGEI\fENT DIVISION OF FORESTRY WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY MORGANTOWN, WV 26506 December 1993 TABLB OP' CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 6 OBJECTIVES 6 PROCEDURES 6 THE STUDY AREA Canaan Valley .... ..... 7 Southern Canaan Valley .... 8 Development and Land Use 8 Existing Environment Hydrology ........ 9 Plant Communities .... 11 1. Northern hardwoods . 11 2. Conifers ... 11 3. Aspen groves . 11 4. Alder thickets 12 5. Ecotone 12 6. Shrub savannah 12 7. Spiraea 13 8. Krummholz 13 9. Bogs ..... 13 10. Beaver ponds 13 11. Agriculture . l4 Vegetation of Southern Canaan Valley Wetlands 14 Rare and Endangered Plant Species 16 Vertebrate Animals 16 1. Fishes .. 16 2. Amphibians 18 3. Reptiles 19 4. Birds 20 5. Mammals 24 Rare and Endangered Animal Species 25 Game Animals 27 Cultural Values 28 Aesthetic Values 31 1. Landform contrast 31 2. Land-use contrast 31 3. Wetland-type diversity 32 4. Internal wetland contrast 32 5. Wetland size ... 32 6. Landform diversity .... 32 DISCUSSION Streams 32 Springs and Spring Seeps 34 Lakes . 35 Wetland Habitats 35 ii Wildlife 36 Management Potential 38 Off-road Vehicle Use 42 Fragmentation . 42 Cultural Values 44 Educational Values SIGNIFICANCE OF THE AREA OF CONCERN FOR FULFILLMENT OF THE CANAAN VALLEY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 1979 EIS OBJECTIVES 46 CONCLUSIONS .. 47 LITERATURE CITED 52 TABLES 54 FIGURES 88 iii LIST OF TABLES 1. Property ownerships of Canaan Valley ... ..... 8 2.
  • Volume 42, Number 2 June 2015

    Volume 42, Number 2 June 2015

    Wisconsin Entomological Society N e w s I e t t e r Volume 42, Number 2 June 2015 Monitoring and Management - A That is, until volunteer moth surveyor, Steve Sensible Pairing Bransky, came onto the scene. Steve had By Beth Goeppinger, Wisconsin Department done a few moth and butterfly surveys here ofN atural Resources and there on the property. But that changed in 2013. Armed with mercury vapor lights, Richard Bong State Recreation Area is a bait and a Wisconsin scientific collector's heavily used 4,515 acre property in the permit, along with our permission, he began Wisconsin State Park system. It is located in surveying in earnest. western Kenosha County. The area is oak woodland, savanna, wetland, sedge meadow, He chose five sites in woodland, prairie and old field and restored and remnant prairie. savanna habitats. He came out many nights Surveys of many kinds and for many species in the months moths might be flying. After are done on the property-frog and toad, finding that moth populations seemed to drift fence, phenology, plants, ephemeral cycle every 3-5 days, he came out more ponds, upland sandpiper, black tern, frequently. His enthusiasm, dedication and grassland and marsh birds, butterfly, small never-ending energy have wielded some mammal, waterfowl, muskrat and wood surprising results. Those results, in turn, ducks to name a few. Moths, except for the have guided us in our habitat management showy and easy-to-identify species, have practices. been ignored. Of the 4,500 moth species found in the state, Steve has confirmed close to 1,200 on the property, and he isn't done yet! He found one of the biggest populations of the endangered Papaipema silphii moths (Silphium borer) in the state as well as 36 species of Catocola moths (underwings), them.
  • Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘I

    Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘I

    Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘i Action BoardApril 2019 Prepared for: Sustainable Resources Group Intn’l, Inc. Prepared by: Matthew J Medeiros, PhD [email protected] mattjmedeiros.comFor All photographs in this report are copyrighted by Matthew J Medeiros. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory Decommissioning ................................................................ 1 1.2 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Permit and Personnel .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Schedule ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Methodology for Inventorying Plants, Lichens, Non-arthropod Animals, and Abiotic Features . 3 2.4.1 Transects: Floral and Abiotic Features ................................................................................
  • (Caenogastropoda: Cochliopidae) from the Atacama Desert, Northern Chile

    (Caenogastropoda: Cochliopidae) from the Atacama Desert, Northern Chile

    Zootaxa 3925 (3): 445–449 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3925.3.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:09962D19-6BDF-4E06-B9B1-2760DDD3236E A new freshwater snail (Caenogastropoda: Cochliopidae) from the Atacama Desert, northern Chile GONZALO A. COLLADO Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Avenida Andrés Bello s/n, Casilla 447, Chillán, Chile. Fundación Chile Natura. E-mail: [email protected] In the family Cochliopidae, Heleobia Stimpson, 1865 is the most speciose genus in South America, with about 90 species (Hershler & Thompson 1992; Cazzaniga 2011). A recent molecular and morphological analysis performed in northern Chile (Atacama Desert) showed that the previously undescribed springsnails from Aguada de Chorrillos belong to Heleobia (Collado et al. 2013). In this study I formally describe this new species. Although this paper does not treat morphology in detail, the anatomical characters, in combination with the previously published molecular data provides a strong basis for recognizing this population as a distinct species. Material and methods The snails were collected alive from Aguada de Chorrillos (27°12′32.40″ S; 70°57′03.30″ W), Atacama Desert, northern Chile using a sieve of 0.5 mm mesh width and stored in absolute ethanol. The shells, opercula and penes were photographed and measured using a Motic SMZ–168 Stereo Microscope with a Moticam 2000 integrated digital camera. Type specimens were deposited in the Museo de Zoología de la Universidad de Concepción (MZUC), Concepción, Chile.
  • Current Tracking List

    Current Tracking List

    Nevada Division of Natural Heritage Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 5002, Carson City, Nevada 89701-5245 voice: (775) 684-2900 | fax: (775) 684-2909 | web: heritage.nv.gov At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List July 2021 The Nevada Division of Natural Heritage (NDNH) A separate list, the Plant and Animal Watch List, systematically curates information on Nevada's contains taxa that could become at-risk in the future. endangered, threatened, sensitive, rare, and at-risk plants and animals providing the most comprehensive Taxa on the At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List are source of information on Nevada’s imperiled organized by taxonomic group, and presented biodiversity. alphabetically by scientific name within each group. Currently, there are 639 Tracking List taxa: 285 plants, Nevada's health and economic well-being depend 209 invertebrates, 65 fishes, 9 amphibians, 7 reptiles, upon its biodiversity and wise land stewardship. This 27 birds, and 37 mammals. challenge increases as population and land-use pressures continue to grow. Nevada is among the top Documentation of population status, locations, or 10 states for both the diversity and the vulnerability of other updates or corrections for any of the taxa on its living heritage. With early planning and responsible this list are always welcome. Literature citations with development, economic growth and our biological taxonomic revisions and descriptions of new taxa are resources can coexist. NDNH is a central source for also appreciated. The Nevada Native Species Site information critical to achieving this balance. Survey Report form is available on our website under Management priorities for the state’s imperiled the Submit Data tab and is the preferred format for biodiversity are continually assessed, providing submitting information to NDNH.
  • The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation

    The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation

    M DC, — _ CO ^. E CO iliSNrNVINOSHilWS' S3ldVyan~LIBRARlES*"SMITHS0N!AN~lNSTITUTl0N N' oCO z to Z (/>*Z COZ ^RIES SMITHSONIAN_INSTITUTlON NOIiniIiSNI_NVINOSHllWS S3ldVaan_L: iiiSNi'^NviNOSHiiNS S3iavyan libraries Smithsonian institution N( — > Z r- 2 r" Z 2to LI ^R I ES^'SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTlON'"NOIini!iSNI~NVINOSHilVMS' S3 I b VM 8 11 w </» z z z n g ^^ liiiSNi NviNOSHims S3iyvyan libraries Smithsonian institution N' 2><^ =: to =: t/J t/i </> Z _J Z -I ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHilWS SSIdVyan L — — </> — to >'. ± CO uiiSNi NViNosHiiws S3iyvaan libraries Smithsonian institution n CO <fi Z "ZL ~,f. 2 .V ^ oCO 0r Vo^^c>/ - -^^r- - 2 ^ > ^^^^— i ^ > CO z to * z to * z ARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNl NVINOSHllWS S3iaVdan L to 2 ^ '^ ^ z "^ O v.- - NiOmst^liS^> Q Z * -J Z I ID DAD I re CH^ITUCnMIAM IMOTtTIITinM / c. — t" — (/) \ Z fj. Nl NVINOSHIIINS S3 I M Vd I 8 H L B R AR I ES, SMITHSONlAN~INSTITUTION NOIlfl :S^SMITHS0NIAN_ INSTITUTION N0liniliSNI__NIVIN0SHillMs'^S3 I 8 VM 8 nf LI B R, ^Jl"!NVINOSHimS^S3iavyan"'LIBRARIES^SMITHS0NIAN~'lNSTITUTI0N^NOIin L '~^' ^ [I ^ d 2 OJ .^ . ° /<SS^ CD /<dSi^ 2 .^^^. ro /l^2l^!^ 2 /<^ > ^'^^ ^ ..... ^ - m x^^osvAVix ^' m S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — NOIlfliliSNrNVINOSHimS^SS iyvyan~LIBR/ S "^ ^ ^ c/> z 2 O _ Xto Iz JI_NVIN0SH1I1/MS^S3 I a Vd a n^LI B RAR I ES'^SMITHSONIAN JNSTITUTION "^NOlin Z -I 2 _j 2 _j S SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3iyVaan LI BR/ 2: r- — 2 r- z NVINOSHiltNS ^1 S3 I MVy I 8 n~L B R AR I Es'^SMITHSONIAN'iNSTITUTIOn'^ NOlin ^^^>^ CO z w • z i ^^ > ^ s smithsonian_institution NoiiniiiSNi to NviNosHiiws'^ss I dVH a n^Li br; <n / .* -5^ \^A DO « ^\t PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECORD AND Journal of Variation Edited by P.A.