DOCSLIB.ORG

11.0 Literature Cited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
11.0 Literature Cited Proposed Major Amendment to the Coachella Valley MSHCP – September 2013 11.0 Literature Cited 1. Aborn DA, and D. Froehlich. 1995. “An Observation of a Summer Tanager Attempting to Eat an Anolis Lizard.” Journal of Field Ornithology 66(4):501–502. 2. Aborn DA, and F.R. Moore. 1997. “Pattern of Movement by Summer Tanagers (Piranga rubra) During Migratory Stopover: A Telemetry Study.” Behavior 134(13–14):1077–100. 3. Abrams L. 1940. Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States: Washington, Oregon, and California. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. 4. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1996. “Le Conte's Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei).” Birds of North America 230:1–24. 5. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 1996. “Summer Tanager: Piranga rubra.” Birds of North America 248:1–23. 6. Adams LW. 1984. “Small Mammal Use of an Interstate Highway Median Strip.” Journal of Applied Ecology 24:175–8. 7. Addicott JF, J.M. Aho, M.F. Antolin, D.K. Padilla, J.S. Richardson, and D.A. Soluk. 1987. “Ecological Neighborhoods: Scaling Environmental Patterns.” OIKOS 49:340–6. 8. Aigner PA, J. Tecklin, and C.E. Koehler. 1995. “Probable Breeding Population of the Black Rail in Yuba County, California.” Western Birds 26(3):157–60. 9. Akcakaya HR. 2000. “Conservation and Management for Multiple Species: Integrating Field Research and Modeling Into Management Decisions.” Environmental Management 26(1):S75–S83. 10. Akcakaya HR. 2000. “Viability Analyses with Habitat-based Metapopulation Models.” Population Ecology 42:45–53. 11. Akcakaya HR. 2001. “Linking Population-level Risk Assessment with Landscape and Habitat Models.” Science of the Total Environment 274:283–91. 12. Akcakaya HR, M.A. Burgman, and L.R. Ginzburg. 1999 May. “Applied Population Ecology.” [Web Page]. Located at: http://www.ramas.com/underg34.htm. Accessed 2002 Aug 4. 13. Alleman AR, E.R. Jacobson, and R.E. Raskin. 1992. “Morphologic and Cytochemical Characteristics of Blood Cells from the Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii).” Am. J. Vet. Res. 53(9):1645–51. 14. Allen E, et al. 1998. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Air Pollution and Climate Change Effects on Forest Ecosystems, Riverside, California, February 5-9, 1996. 15. Allen E, et al. 2000. “Air Pollution and Vegetation Change in (Southern California) Shrublands.” Proceedings of the Symposium on Planning for Biodiversity: Bringing Research and Management Together, February 29-March 3, 2000. 11-1 Proposed Major Amendment to the Coachella Valley MSHCP – September 2013 16. Allen JA, and W.W. Price. 1895. “On a Collection of Mammals from Arizona and Mexico.” Volume 7. New York: American Museum of Natural History Bulletin. p. 123-258. 17. Allen M, W. Hodges, T. Scott, S. Snyder, T. Tennant, and W. Wehtje. 2002. Report to CVAG on Supplemental Activities: July 10, 2002 (Task 1: Documentation of Preserve Design Selection Criteria; Task 2: Evaluation of the Sites Model for Preserve Design; Task 3: Natural Community Map Evaluation, Natural Community and Mapping Unit Accuracy). Unpublished report to Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) prepared by listed associates of the Center for Conservation Biology, University of California Riverside. 18. Allen MF. 2003. Interim Report to the California Department of Fish and Game. Unpublished report on monitoring approaches for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. January 2003. 24 pp. 19. Allen MF. 2003. Report to the Coachella Valley Association of Governments. Unpublished report on a monitoring approach for the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. March 2003. 23 pp. 20. Allendorf FW, R.F. Leary, P. Spruell, and J.K. Wenburg. 2001. “The Problem with Hybrids: Setting Conservation Guidelines.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16(11):613–22. 21. Alvarez-Castaneda ST, E. Rios, and A. Gutierrez-Ramos. 2001. “Noteworthy Records of the Little Pocket Mouse (Heteromyidae: Perognathus longimembris) on the Baja California Peninsula.” Southwestern Naturalist 46(2):243–5. 22. Ambuel B, and S.A. Temple. 1983. “Area-dependent Changes in the Bird Communities and Vegetation of Southern Wisconsin Forests.” Ecology 64(5):1057–68. 23. Amos W, and A. Balmford. 2001. “When Does Conservation Genetics Matter?” Heredity 87:257–65. 24. Andelman S, I. Ball, F. Davis, and D. Stoms. 1999. SITES V 1.0: An Analytical Toolbox for Designing Ecoregional Conservation Portfolios. A manual prepared for The Nature Conservancy by the Institute for Computational Earth System Science and Department of Geography, University of California Santa Barbara. 25. Andelman SJ, and W.F. Fagan. 2000. “Umbrellas and Flagships: Efficient Conservation Surrogates or Expensive Mistakes?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97(11):5954–9. 26. Andersen MC, J.M. Watts, J.E. Freilich, S.R. Yool, G.I. Wakefield, J.F. McCauley, and P.B. Fahnestock. 2000. “Regression-tree Modeling of Desert Tortoise Habitat in the Central Mojave Desert.” Ecological Applications 10(3):890–900. 27. Anderson BW. 1995. “California Exotic Pest Plant Council: Salt Cedar, Revegetation and Riparian Ecosystems in the Southwest. 1995 CalEPPC Symposium Proceedings.” [Web Page]. Located at: http://www.caleppc.org/symposia/95symposium/anderson.html. Accessed 2002 Aug 10. 11-2 Proposed Major Amendment to the Coachella Valley MSHCP – September 2013 28. Anderson BW, and R.D. Ohmart. 1985. “Habitat Use by Clapper Rails in the Lower Colorado River Valley.” Condor 87:116–26. 29. Anderson DR, and K. P. Burnham. 1996. A Monitoring Program for the Desert Tortoise. Unpublished report. 15 pp. 30. Anderson DR, K.P. Burnham, B.C. Lubow, L. Thomas, P.S. Corn, P.A. Medica, and R.W. Marlow. 2001. “Field Trials of Line Transect Methods Applied to Estimation of Desert Tortoise Abundance.” Journal of Wildlife Management 65(3):583–97. 31. Anderson DR, K.P. Burnham, W.R. Gould, and S. Cherry. 2001. “Concerns About Finding Results That Are Actually Spurious.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:311–6. 32. Anderson J, and S. Yaffee. 1997. Balancing Public Trust and Private Interest: Public Participation in Habitat Conservation Planning, A Summary Report. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources and Environment. 33. Anderson JL. 1994. “Exclosures on the Beaver Dam Slope in Arizona and Utah.” Rangelands 16(5):184–8. 34. Ando A, J. Camm, S. Polasky, and A. Solow. 1998. “Species Distributions, Land Values, and Efficient Conservation.” Science 279:2126–8. 35. Andreassen HP, S. Halle, and R.A. Ims. 1996. “Optimal Width of Movement Corridors for Root Voles: Not Too Narrow and Not Too Wide.” Journal of Applied Ecology 33:63–70. 36. Andren H. 1992. “Corvid Density and Nest Predation in Relation to Forest Fragmentation: A Landscape Perspective.” Ecology 73(3):794–804. 37. Andren H, and P. Angelstam. 1988. “Elevated Predation Rates as an Edge Effect in Habitat Islands: Experimental Evidence.” Ecology 69:544–7. 38. Andrew NG, V.C. Bleich, A.D. Morrison, L.M. Lesicka, and P.J. Cooley. 2001. “Wildlife Mortalities Associated With Artificial Water Sources.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 29(1):275–80. 39. Andrew NG, V.C. Bleich, P.V. August, and S.G. Torres. 1997. “Demography of Mountain Sheep in the East Chocolate Mountains, California.” California Fish and Game 83(2):68–77. 40. Andrews FG, A.R. Hardy, and D. Giuliani. 1979. The Coleopterous Fauna of Selected California Sand Dunes. Sacramento, California: Bureau of Land Management, report # CA-960- 1285-1225-DEOO. 41. Armstrong WP. 1998 Jan. “The Life & Love of Sand Dunes: Part 1, Phenomena of the Wind!” [Web Page]. Located at: http://www.desertusa.com/magjan98/dunes/jan_dune1.html. Accessed 2002 Aug 10. 42. Armstrong WP. 1998 Feb. “The Life & Love of Sand Dunes: Part 2, Life on the Dunes.” [Web Page]. Located at: http://www.desertusa.com/magfeb98/dunes/jan_dune2.html. Accessed 2002 Aug 10. 11-3 Proposed Major Amendment to the Coachella Valley MSHCP – September 2013 43. Arnold C. 1990. “Wildlife Corridors. California Coast and Ocean.” Summer: 10-21. 44. Arrowood PC, C.A. Finley, and B.C. Thompson. 2001. “Analyses of Burrowing Owl Populations in New Mexico.” Journal of Raptor Research 35(4):362–70. 45. As S. 1999. “Invasion of Matrix Species in Small Habitat Patches.” Conservation Ecology 3(1). 46. Aubrey KB. no date. A Key for Identifying Mammal Tracks on Sooted Aluminum Tracking Stations. Unpublished report. 11 pp. 47. Auffenberg W, and R. Franz. 1978. Gopherus agassizii. Catalog. Amer. Amphib. Rept 212:1–2. 48. Averett DE, and K.R. Neisess. 1993. Salvia. In: J.C. Hickman, ed. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. p. 725–9, 733. 49. Avery H. 1998. Nutritional Ecology of the Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) in Relation to Cattle Grazing in the Mojave Desert. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Los Angeles. 50. Avise JC, B.W. Bowen, T. Lamb, A.B. Meylan, and E. Bermingham. 1992. “Mitochondrial DNA Evolution at a Turtle's Pace: Evidence for Low Genetic Variability and Reduced Microevolutionary Rate in Testudines.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 9(3):457–73. 51. Bachelet D, R.P. Neilson, J.M. Lenihan, and R.J. Drapek. 2001. “Climate Change Effects on Vegetation Distribution and Carbon Budget in the United States.” Ecosystems 4:164–85. 52. Bagley M. 1989. Sensitive Plant Species Survey on a Portion of the Proposed Fort Irwin NTC Expansion Area, San Bernardino County, California. Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles, California. 53. Bailey SJ, C.R. Schwalbe, and C.H. Lowe. 1995. “Hibernaculum Use by a Population of Desert Tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) in the Sonoran Desert.” Journal of Herpetology 29(3):361–9. 54. Bainbridge DA, and R.A. Virginia. 1990. “Restoration in the Sonoran Desert of California.” Restoration & Management 8(1):3–14. 55. Baker RJ, J.C. Patton, H.H.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for Casey’S June Beetle and Designation of Critical Habitat; Final Rule
    Vol. 76 Thursday, No. 184 September 22, 2011 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for Casey’s June Beetle and Designation of Critical Habitat; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:48 Sep 21, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\22SER3.SGM 22SER3 jlentini on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with RULES3 58954 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 184 / Thursday, September 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR family (Scarabaeidae) (Smith and Evans in the proposed rule) (Hawks pers. 2005). Despite past references to comm., 2010; see below discussion). Fish and Wildlife Service potentially new species or subspecies of Hawks (pers. comm. 2010, 2011a and Dinacoma (Blaisdell 1930, pp. 173–174; b) located two occupied Casey’s June 50 CFR Part 17 La Rue pers. comm., 2006), Casey’s June beetle sites outside of proposed critical habitat, in natural remnants of the Palm [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2009–0019; MO beetle, Dinacoma caseyi Blaisdell, and 92210–0–0009] D. marginata (Casey) Casey remain the Canyon Wash channel surrounded by only described taxonomic entities in the golf course landscaping just east of the RIN 1018–AV91 genus (Evans and Smith 2009, p. 44). easternmost section of wash proposed as critical habitat, in the vicinity of Golf Endangered and Threatened Wildlife For additional information on the taxonomy, biology, and ecology of Club Drive. These wash habitat and Plants; Determination of remnants total 17 acres (ac) (7 hectares Endangered Status for Casey’s June Casey’s June beetle, and the history of this rulemaking, refer to the August 8, (ha)), and are downstream from the Beetle and Designation of Critical confluence of Palm Canyon Wash and Habitat 2006, 90-day finding (71 FR 44960), the July 5, 2007, 12-month finding (72 FR Tahquiz Creek, where additional AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 36635), the July 9, 2009, proposed streamflow occurs following a storm Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarabs Stlqikwmthlffnyotsieiiec
    SCARABS STLQIKWMTHLFFNYOTSIEIIEC Occasional Issue Number 84 Print ISSN 1937-8343 Online ISSN 1937-8351 September, 2017 Notes on the Genus Pachypus (Coleoptera: WITHIN THIS ISSUE Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae: Pachypodini) Notes on the Genus Pachypus ............................ 1 by Stéphane Le Tirant & René Limoges Ville de Montréal Delbert LaRue ................... 7 Montréal Insectarium 4581 rue Sherbrooke Elephant Dung Beetles ... 9 Montréal, Quebec Canada H1X 2B2 Dave Marqua .................. 16 Email: [email protected] Introduction P. sardiniensis Guerlach, Bazzato, Cillo, 2013 - (Sardinia - endemic). To date, no article or photograph of the Pachypodini tribe has ever The species are very similar, making been published in Scarabs. We identification difficult. There is also thought it would be interesting wide variability within each species. to present an overview of genus Pachypus, along with a few Genus Pachypus has antennae BACK ISSUES spectacular photographs of these with eight segments, five of them Available At These Sites: fascinating beetles. comprising the club. These beetles are usually 12 to 16 mm long. The Coleopterists Society www.coleopsoc.org/de- History males have a deeply excavated fault.asp?Action=Show_ pronotum on the disk. The Resources&ID=Scarabs The Pachypodini tribe was created females, few of which are found by Erichson in 1840 and contains in collections, have no scutellum, University of Nebraska a single genus: Pachypus (Dejean wings or elytra whatsoever. www-museum.unl.edu/ research/entomology/ 1821). Five species have been Scarabs-Newsletter.htm described thus far: Mysterious Biology EDITORS Pachypus caesus Erichson, 1840 - The male and female biology is Rich Cunningham (Italy. Sicily - endemic). fascinating. The male spends much [email protected] P.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Monday, November 9, 2009 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Native Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions; Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:08 Nov 06, 2009 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\09NOP3.SGM 09NOP3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 57804 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 215 / Monday, November 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR October 1, 2008, through September 30, for public inspection by appointment, 2009. during normal business hours, at the Fish and Wildlife Service We request additional status appropriate Regional Office listed below information that may be available for in under Request for Information in 50 CFR Part 17 the 249 candidate species identified in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. General [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0075; MO- this CNOR. information we receive will be available 9221050083–B2] DATES: We will accept information on at the Branch of Candidate this Candidate Notice of Review at any Conservation, Arlington, VA (see Endangered and Threatened Wildlife time. address above). and Plants; Review of Native Species ADDRESSES: This notice is available on Candidate Notice of Review That Are Candidates for Listing as the Internet at http:// Endangered or Threatened; Annual www.regulations.gov, and http:// Background Notice of Findings on Resubmitted endangered.fws.gov/candidates/ The Endangered Species Act of 1973, Petitions; Annual Description of index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Federal Register, 72 FR 36635; Centralized Library: U.S. Fish And
    Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules 36635 Dated: June 26, 2007. required to submit a copy of this Report FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Robert E. Roberts, and Order to GAO pursuant to the Bartel, Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish Regional Administrator, Region 8. Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES) [FR Doc. E7–13060 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am] 801(a)(1)(A), because the proposed rule (telephone 760–431–9440; facsimile BILLING CODE 6560–50–P is dismissed.) 760–431–5901). Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 (TDD) may call the Federal Information Radio, Radio broadcasting. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. COMMISSION Federal Communications Commission. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: John A. Karousos, Background 47 CFR Part 73 Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act (16 [DA 07–2651; MB Docket No. 05–191; RM– Bureau. U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that, for 11243] [FR Doc. E7–12860 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am] any petition to revise the List of BILLING CODE 6712–01–P Endangered and Threatened Wildlife or Radio Broadcasting Services; Elberton the List of Endangered and Threatened and Union Point, GA Plants that contains substantial AGENCY: Federal Communications DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR scientific and commercial information Commission. that listing may be warranted, we make Fish and Wildlife Service ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal. a finding within 12 months of
    [Show full text]
  • Casey's June Beetle
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL ) Petition to Emergency-List DIVERSITY ) Casey’s June Beetle ) (Dinacoma caseyi Blaisdell 1930) SIERRA CLUB ) as a Federally Endangered Species ) DAVID H. WRIGHT, PH.D. ) ) Petitioners ) ) Photo by Dale Powell David H. Wright PhD. 1573 49th Street Sacramento, CA 95819 Center for Biological Diversity P.O. Box 493 Idyllwild, CA 92549 Sierra Club c/o Joan Taylor 1800 S. Sunrise Way Palm Springs, CA 92264 May 11, 2004 Petition to list Casey’s June Beetle as a Federally Endangered Species The Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, and David H. Wright, Ph.D., hereby formally petition the Secretary of Interior (Secretary) to list Casey’s June beetle, Dinacoma caseyi Blaisdell 1930 (hereafter, Casey’s June beetle or “the beetle”), as endangered pursuant to the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. (hereafter "the Act"). This petition is filed under 5 U.S.C. 553 (e) and 50 CFR 424.14 (1990), which grant interested parties the right to petition for issue of a rule from the Secretary of the Interior. Critical Habitat Petitioners also note that critical habitat should be designated for the beetle concurrent with final listing, consistent with 50 CFR 424.12, and pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. 553). We note that species with designated critical habitat are in better recovery status than species without (Rachlinski 1997, http://www.nativeecosystems.org/criticalhabitat/Critical_Habitat_Fact_Sheet_May_2003. pdf , http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/swcbd/programs/policy/ch/sub1.html). Emergency Listing Because of the extremely limited range of the species and extraordinary imminent threats to its continued existence, we strongly urge the Secretary and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter #20.Pub
    No. 20, Autumn 2003 University of California, Riverside Friends of the Entomology Research Museum Newsletter Editor: Rick Vetter Proofing Editors: G. Ballmer, D. Hawks, D. Yanega FERM Officers FERM field trip to President : Greg Ballmer Vice-president: Jeremiah George the Coso Mountains Treasurer: Dave Hawks August 8-10, 2003 Secretary: Dale Powell by G.R.Ballmer E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] Gordon Pratt’s annual FERM field trip to the [email protected], [email protected] China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station (CLNAWS) began with a rendezvous of four elite participants at the Bangkok Chef Restaurant in Ridgecrest at 4:30 pm on Friday the 8th of August. Following a feast of Thai delicacies, the over- stuffed crew consisting of Gordon Pratt, Cecilia Pierce, Greg Ballmer, and Lisa Pierce chugged off to the Coso Hot Springs area on the central west- ern edge of the North Range. CLNAWS consists of two tenuously linked ranges in the western Mo- Entomological Quotes jave Desert, each the size of Orange County. The North Range includes both the Argus and Coso "Consider well the proportion of things. It is Mountain Ranges, which rise in elevation to nearly better to be a young June-bug than an old bird 9000 and 8400 feet, respectively. of paradise" Mark Twain Coso Hot Springs is an extinct spa at the edge of an active geothermal area currently exploited by "The difference between the right word and the the Southern California Edison Company for gen- almost right word is the difference between eration of electrical energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinacoma Caseyi
    Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 128 / Thursday, July 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules 36635 Dated: June 26, 2007. required to submit a copy of this Report FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Robert E. Roberts, and Order to GAO pursuant to the Bartel, Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish Regional Administrator, Region 8. Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES) [FR Doc. E7–13060 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am] 801(a)(1)(A), because the proposed rule (telephone 760–431–9440; facsimile BILLING CODE 6560–50–P is dismissed.) 760–431–5901). Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 (TDD) may call the Federal Information Radio, Radio broadcasting. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. COMMISSION Federal Communications Commission. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: John A. Karousos, Background 47 CFR Part 73 Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act (16 [DA 07–2651; MB Docket No. 05–191; RM– Bureau. U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that, for 11243] [FR Doc. E7–12860 Filed 7–3–07; 8:45 am] any petition to revise the List of BILLING CODE 6712–01–P Endangered and Threatened Wildlife or Radio Broadcasting Services; Elberton the List of Endangered and Threatened and Union Point, GA Plants that contains substantial AGENCY: Federal Communications DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR scientific and commercial information Commission. that listing may be warranted, we make Fish and Wildlife Service ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal. a finding within 12 months of
    [Show full text]
  • Article ISSN 2147-7612 (Online Edition)
    J. Insect Biodiversity 017 (2): 028–035 ISSN 2538-1318 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/jib J. Insect Biodiversity Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2147-7612 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.12976/jib/2020.17.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0B6ED543-EB48-4FFC-9847-E07D9A74C866 A new species of melolonthine chafer in the endemic Californian genus Dinacoma Casey (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) CONRAD P.D.T. GILLETT1,3*, KENDALL H. OSBORNE2,4, J. BRADLEY REIL1,5 & DANIEL RUBINOFF1,6 1 Entomology Section, Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, School of Tropical Agriculture and Human Re- sources, University of Hawai’i at Mânoa Honolulu, HI 96822, U.S.A. 2 Osborne Biological Consulting, 6675 Avenue Juan Diaz, Riverside, CA 92509, U.S.A. 3 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1487-4003 4 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8494-373X 5 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9511-960X 6 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2732-3032 *Corresponding author Abstract We describe Dinacoma sanfelipe sp. nov. from southern California, the first new species belonging to the melolonthine scarab beetle genus Dinacoma Casey, 1889 (Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae: Melolonthini) to be described in 90 years, based upon examination of 141 specimens of that genus. Diagnostic comments, a dichotomous key, photographs of all species of Dinacoma, and a distribution map are presented to facilitate the identification of adult male specimens. One species in the genus is federally listed under the United States Endangered Species act, and all known species may be of conservation concern.
    [Show full text]
  • State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Animals of California
    STATE AND FEDERALLY LISTED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED ANIMALS OF CALIFORNIA July 2021 State of California Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Wildlife Biogeographic Data Branch California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Table of Contents Overview ................................................................................................................................ i Background ............................................................................................................................ i Listing Status Summary Table ..............................................................................................ii List Content ........................................................................................................................... iii Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................... iv Additional Resources........................................................................................................... iv Overview This document contains a list of animal taxa found within California or off the coast of the State that have been classified as endangered or threatened by the California Fish and Game Commission (FGC; state listed) or by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior or the U.S. Secretary of Commerce (federally listed). This list also includes taxa that are official candidates for state or federal listing, or have been officially proposed for federal listing, as well as taxa that were once listed
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Scarabaeoidea Oftexas (Coleoptera)
    SUPPL.NO.26 SOUTHWESTERNENTOMOLOGIST MAR.2003 AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE SCARABAEOIDEA OFTEXAS (COLEOPTERA) EdwardG. Riley Deparfinentof Entomology TexasA&M University CollegeStation, T exas77 845 [email protected] and CharlesS. Wolfe Departmentof BiologY University of Texasat Arlington Arlington,Texas 76019 ABSTRACT A list of 544 species/subspeciesof Scarabaeoidea reoorded from Texasis presented. Eachspecies on the list is annotatedwith within-statedistributional data by reoordingits pr"r*.. in eachof sevenregions ofTexas, or by providingthe sourcefor lessprecise Texas iecords.Twelve specieson the list are representedby dubiousTexas records and are recommendedfor rernovalfiom futuretabulations of TexasColeoptera. Forty'eight species aredocumented from Texasfor the first Ertre.Aphodius giuliani Gordon,Diplotaxis simplet Blanchardand Phanaeus adonis Harold are recorded from Americanorth of Mexico for the first time. Phyttophagaopacita F.:eirfi:f.rd is placedin synonymy:]ufJdet Phyllophaga arcta (Hom) NEW SVNOWnvtV.Sixty-five species are recognized as beingreoorded only from i"*ur. Thirty-fo* oftheseare not likely to occuroutside the stateand are identified as Texas endernics.The southTexas plains region is hometo moreTexas endemics than any other regionofthe state.Ofthe generarepresented by Texasendernics, the ge,lrusPhyllophaga is especiallywell representedwith 13species endanic to Texas. INTRODUCTION "scarab The Superfamily Scarabaeoideaincludes the familiar Scarabaeidae- beetles," "stag 'bess the Lucanidae - beetles," Passalidae- beetles," and several of the traditional subfamilies of the Scarabaeidaethat are now generally treated as s€,pulratefamilies. The group is diverse in North America and worldwide, In Texas, the group comprisesone of a i"* latge, cohesiveblocks of Texasbeetle diversity. In additionto speciesdiversity, their vmied habitats, food pr€ferences,and behavior make scarabaeoidsan important group for a wide range of research areas, including behavioral ecology, biogeography, biodiversity' systernaticsand conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Outline for Casey's June Beetle—March 2013
    Recovery Outline for Casey’s June Beetle—March 2013 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Fin Recovery Outline for Casey’s June Beetle (Dinacoma caseyi) Casey’s June beetle (Dinacoma caseyi) habitat in Palm Canyon (Photo credit: Alison Anderson, USFWS). Casey’s June beetle female (small upper photo) and male (small lower photo) (Photo credit: Felicia Sirchia, USFWS). Common Name: Casey’s June Beetle Scientific Name: Dinacoma caseyi Listing Status: Endangered; September 22, 2011 (76 FR 58954) Critical Habitat Designation: September 22, 2011 (76 FR 58954) Lead Agency/Region: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Southwest Region Lead Field Office: Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office 6010 Hidden Valley Road, Suite 101 Carlsbad, CA 92011 760–431–9440 Approved: March 2013 1 Recovery Outline for Casey’s June Beetle—March 2013 Purpose of the Recovery Outline: This document lays out a preliminary course of action for the survival and recovery of Casey’s June beetle (Dinacoma caseyi). It is meant to serve as interim guidance to direct recovery efforts and inform consultation and permitting activities until a comprehensive draft recovery plan has been completed. Recovery outlines are intended primarily for internal use by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), and formal public participation will be invited upon the release of the draft recovery plan. However, we will consider any new information or comments that members of the public may wish to offer in response to this outline during the recovery planning process. For more information on Federal survival and recovery efforts for Casey’s June beetle, or to provide additional comments, interested parties may contact the lead field office, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, for this species at 6010 Hidden Valley Road, Suite 101 Carlsbad, CA 92011, phone 760–431–9440.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Federal Register, 71 FR 44960; Centralized Library: U.S. Fish And
    44960 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules his/her sole discretion shall determine certification that the grantee or three business day comment period or at the need for an Emergency Relief subgrantee made good faith efforts to a later scheduled public hearing. Docket. contact, by whatever means available, Issued in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of (c) All petitions for relief must be private charter or school bus operators August 2006. posted in the docket in order to receive to determine whether those entities are Sandra K. Bushue, consideration by FTA. willing to provide the service. FTA Deputy Administrator. (1) The docket is publicly accessible Documentation should include the [FR Doc. 06–6771 Filed 8–7–06; 8:45 am] and can be accessed 24 hours a day, name and address of the private charter seven days a week, via the Internet at operator(s), the date the requestor (e.g., BILLING CODE 4910–57–M the docket facility’s Web site at http:// the transit agency) contacted the dms.dot.gov. Petitions may also be operator(s), and what response the submitted by U.S. mail or by hand requestor received. In addition, the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR delivery to the DOT Docket grantee or subgrantee must certify that Fish and Wildlife Service Management Facility, Room PL–401 it contacted the American Bus (Plaza Level), 400 7th Street, SW., Association (e-mail: [email protected], 50 CFR Part 17 Washington, DC 20590. phone: (202) 842–1645); the United (2) In the event a person needs to Motor Coach Association (e-mail: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife request immediate relief and does not [email protected], phone: (800) 424–8262); and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a have access to electronic means to and the National School Transportation Petition To List the Casey’s June request that relief, the person may Association (e-mail: Beetle (Dinacoma caseyi) as contact any FTA regional office and [email protected], phone: (800) Endangered request that the FTA regional office 222Z–NSTA).
    [Show full text]