DOCSLIB.ORG

Special Animals List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Special Animals List SPECIAL ANIMALS LIST July 2021 State of California Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Wildlife Biogeographic Data Branch California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Recommended Citation: California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). July 2021. Special Animals List. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Sacramento, CA. Table of Contents Special Animals ................................................................................................................ i NatureServe Element Ranking ........................................................................................ iii Animal Element Occurrences and Mapping .................................................................. viii Taxonomic Standards .....................................................................................................ix Listing and Special Status Information ............................................................................xi Table of Special Status Code Abbreviations ................................................................ xvii Special Animals List .................................................................................................... xviii Special Animals “Special Animals” is a broad term used to refer to all the animal taxa tracked by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), regardless of their legal or protection status. This list is also referred to as the list of “species at risk” or “special status species.” The Special Animals List includes species, subspecies, Distinct Population Segments (DPS), or Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESU) where at least one of the following conditions applies: • Officially listed or proposed for listing under state and/or federal endangered species acts • Taxa considered by the Department of Fish and Wildlife to be a Species of Special Concern (SSC) • Taxa which meet the criteria for listing, even if not currently included on any list, as described in Section 15380 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines • Taxa that are biologically rare, very restricted in distribution, or declining throughout their range, but not currently threatened with extirpation • Population(s) in California that may be peripheral to the major portion of a taxon’s range but are threatened with extirpation in California • Taxa closely associated with a habitat that is declining in California at a significant rate (e.g., wetlands, riparian, vernal pools, old growth forests, desert aquatic systems, native grasslands, valley shrubland habitats, etc.) • Taxa designated as a special status, sensitive, or declining species by other state or federal agencies, or a non-governmental organization (NGO), and determined by the CNDDB to be rare, restricted, declining, or threatened across their range in California The Special Animals List contains taxa that are actively inventoried, tracked, and mapped by the CNDDB, as well as taxa for which mapped data may not yet be incorporated into CNDDB user products. For the latter taxa, information at the county i and 7.5-minute USGS quadrangle level can be accessed via the CNDDB QuickView Tool. Taxa with a “Yes” in the “End Notes?” column have additional information in the End Notes section at the back of the list. Additional information about the California Natural Diversity Database is available on the CNDDB website. Information on other CDFW resource management programs is available on the Department’s Conservation and Management of Wildlife and Habitat website. The CDFW Nongame Wildlife Program provides additional information on wildlife habitat, threats, and survey guidelines. ii NatureServe Element Ranking The California Natural Diversity Database program is a member of the NatureServe Network of natural heritage programs, and uses the same conservation status methodology as other network programs. The ranking system was originally developed by The Nature Conservancy and is now maintained and recently revised by NatureServe. It includes a Global rank (G-rank), describing the status for a given taxon over its entire distribution, and a State rank (S-rank), describing the status for the taxon over its state distribution. For subspecies and varieties, there is also a “T” rank describing the global rank for the infraspecific taxon. The next page of this document details the criteria used to assign element ranks, from G1 to G5 for the Global rank and from S1 to S5 for the State rank. Procedurally, state programs such as the CNDDB develop the State ranks. The Global ranks are determined collaboratively among the Heritage Programs for the states/provinces containing the species. NatureServe then checks for consistency and logical errors at the national level. Because the units of conservation may include non-taxonomic biological entities such as populations or ecological communities, NatureServe refers to the targets of biological conservation as “elements” rather than taxa. An element rank is assigned using standard criteria and rank definitions. This standardization makes the ranks comparable between organisms and across political boundaries. NatureServe has developed a “rank calculator” to help increase repeatability and transparency of the ranking process. The three main categories that are taken into consideration when assigning an element rank are rarity, threats, and trends. Within these three categories, various factors are considered, including: • Range extent, area of occupancy, population size, total number of occurrences, and number of good occurrences (ranked A or B). Environmental specificity can also be used if other information is lacking. • Overall threat impact as well as intrinsic vulnerability (if threats are unknown). • Long-term and short-term trends. iii Detailed information on this element ranking methodology can be found on the NatureServe Conservation Status Assessment website. Listed below are definitions for interpreting global and state conservation status ranks. An element’s ranking status may be adjusted up or down depending upon the considerations above. Global Ranking The global rank (G-rank) is a reflection of the overall status of an element throughout its global range. • GX: Presumed Extinct – Not located despite intensive searches and virtually no likelihood of rediscovery. • GH: Possibly Extinct – Known from only historical occurrences but still some hope of rediscovery. Examples of evidence include (1) that a species has not been documented in approximately 20-40 years despite some searching and/or some evidence of significant habitat loss or degradation; (2) that a species has been searched for unsuccessfully, but not thoroughly enough to presume that it is extinct throughout its range. • G1: Critically Imperiled – At very high risk of extinction due to very restricted range, very few populations or occurrences, very steep declines, very severe threats, or other factors. • G2: Imperiled – At high risk of extinction due to restricted range, few populations or occurrences, steep declines, severe threats, or other factors. • G3: Vulnerable – At moderate risk of extinction due to a fairly restricted range, relatively few populations or occurrences, recent and widespread declines, threats, or other factors. • G4: Apparently Secure – At fairly low risk of extinction due to an extensive range and/or many populations or occurrences, but with possible cause for some concern as a result of local recent declines, threats, or other factors. iv • G5: Secure – At very low risk of extinction due to a very extensive range, abundant populations or occurrences, and little to no concern from declines or threats. • GNR: Unranked – Global rank not yet assessed. State Ranking The state rank (S-rank) is assigned in much the same way as the global rank, but state ranks refer to the imperilment status only within California’s state boundaries. • SX: Presumed Extirpated – Species is believed to be extirpated from the state Not located despite intensive searches of historical sites and other appropriate habitat, and virtually no likelihood that it will be rediscovered • SH: Possibly Extirpated – Known from only historical records but still some hope of rediscovery. There is evidence that the species may no longer be present in the state, but not enough to state this with certainty. Examples of such evidence include (1) that a species has not been documented in approximately 20-40 years despite some searching and/or some evidence of significant habitat loss or degradation; (2) that a species has been searched for unsuccessfully, but not thoroughly enough to presume that it is no longer present in the jurisdiction. • S1: Critically Imperiled – At very high risk of extirpation in the state due to very restricted range, very few populations or occurrences, very steep declines, severe threats, or other factors. • S2: Imperiled – At high risk of extirpation in the state due to restricted range, few populations or occurrences, steep declines, severe threats, or other factors. • S3: Vulnerable – At moderate risk of extirpation in the state due to a fairly restricted range, relatively few populations or occurrences, recent and widespread declines, threats, or other factors. • S4: Apparently Secure – At a fairly low risk of extirpation in the state due to an extensive range and/or many populations or occurrences, but with possible cause for some concern as a result of local recent declines, threats, or other factors. v • S5: Secure – At very low or no risk
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANTC Environmental Assessment
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-B010-2013-0024-EA Telecommunication Facilities at Kingston, Dyer, and Hickison Summit July 2013 Applicant: Arizona Nevada Tower Corporation 6220 McLeod Drive Ste. 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89120 Battle Mountain District Bureau of Land Management 50 Bastian Road Battle Mountain, Nevada 89820 Table of Contents Page Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Background 1 1.3 Identifying Information 2 1.4 Location of Proposed Action 2 1.5 Preparing Office 2 1.6 Case File Numbers 2 1.7 Applicant 2 1.8 Proposed Action Summary 3 1.9 Conformance 3 1.10 Purpose & Need 3 1.11 Scoping, Public Involvement & Issues 4 Chapter 2 Proposed Action & Alternatives 11 2.1 Proposed Action 11 2.1.1 Best Management Practices 13 2.2 No Action Alternative 13 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis 14 Chapter 3 Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 15 3.1 Project Site Descriptions 15 3.2 Issues 16 3.2.1 Air Quality 18 3.2.1.1 Affected Environment 18 3.2.1.2 Environmental Consequences 18 3.2.2 Cultural/Historical Resources 18 3.2.2.1 Affected Environment 18 3.2.2.2 Environmental Consequences 18 3.2.3 Noxious Weeds/Invasive Non-native Plants 19 3.2.3.1 Affected Environment 19 3.2.3.2 Environmental Consequences 20 3.2.4 Native American Religious Concerns 20 3.2.4.1 Affected Environment 20 3.2.4.2 Environmental Consequences 20 3.2.5 Migratory Birds 21 3.2.5.1 Affected Environment 21 3.2.5.2 Environmental Consequences 22 3.2.6 Solid/Hazardous
    [Show full text]
  • By Agabus Bipustulatus (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)
    Predation on Italian newt larva, Lissotriton italicus (Amphibia, Caudata, Salamandridae), by Agabus bipustulatus (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) LUIGI CORSETTI1 and GIANLUCA NARDI2 1 Via Adige, 45. I-04100 Latina, Italy. 2 Centro Nazionale per lo Studio e la Conservazione della Biodiversità Forestale - Corpo Forestale dello Stato. Strada Mantova, 29. I-46045 Marmirolo (MN), Italy. 2 Author for correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT — Predation of a larva of Lissotriton italicus by adults of a diving beetle (Agabus bipustulatus) on the Aurunci Mountains (central Italy, Latium region) is recorded. This is the first identified invertebrate predator of this Italian endemic newt. The possible role of this beetle in the local demographic control of the newt is briefly discussed. HE Italian Newt, Lissotriton italicus (Peracca), (Latina province, Castelforte, Monte Siola W-SW Tpreviously referred to the genus Triturus slope, 240 m a.s.l). No other amphibians occurred (Rafinesque), is endemic to central and southern in the pond, which was probably feebly trickle fed Italy. The northern most limits of its distribution by a very small spring. In this pond about 15 adults include an oblique area extended from the Ancona of a predaceous diving beetle, Agabus bipustulatus province (Marches region) South to Lepini (Linnaeus) (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) were Mountains (Latium region, Rome province), on observed attacking a larva of the Italian Newt. The the Adriatic and Tyrrhenian sides of the Apennines, larva was initially attacked by a single beetle that respectively (Corsetti et al., 2005; Balletto, 2006; was quickly followed by the others and was Scillitani et al., 2006; Scillitani & Tripepi, 2007). devoured, almost completely, in about 10-15 It is a euryoecious species living in a wide range seconds.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Tiger Salamander,Ambystoma Mavortium
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Western Tiger Salamander Ambystoma mavortium Southern Mountain population Prairie / Boreal population in Canada Southern Mountain population – ENDANGERED Prairie / Boreal population – SPECIAL CONCERN 2012 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Western Tiger Salamander Ambystoma mavortium in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xv + 63 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2001. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 33 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Schock, D.M. 2001. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-33 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Arthur Whiting for writing the status report on the Western Tiger Salamander, Ambystoma mavortium, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Kristiina Ovaska, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Amphibians and Reptiles Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la Salamandre tigrée de l’Ouest (Ambystoma mavortium) au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Documentation
    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Species List
    Species List M001 Opossum M025 Brazilian Free-tailed Bat M049 Mountain Pocket Gopher Didelphis virginiana Tadarida brasiliensis Thomomys monticola M002 Mount Lyell Shrew M026 Pika M050 Little Pocket Mouse Sorex lyelli Ochotona princeps Perognathus longimembris M003 Vagrant Shrew M027 Brush Rabbit M051 Great Basin Pocket Mouse Sorex vagrans Sylvilagus bachmani Perognathus parvus M004 Dusky Shrew M028 Desert Cottontail M052 Yellow-eared Pocket Mouse Sorex monticolus Sylvilagus audubonii Perognathus xanthonotus M005 Ornate Shrew M029 Snowshoe Hare M053 California Pocket Mouse Sorex ornatus Lepus americanus Perognathus californicus M006 Water Shrew M030 White-tailed Jackrabbit M054 Heermann's Kangaroo Rat Sorex palustris Lepus townsendii Dipodomys heermanni M007 Trowbridge's Shrew M031 Black-tailed Jackrabbit M055 California Kangaroo Rat Sorex trowbridgii Lepus californicus Dipodomys californicus M008 Shrew-mole M032 Mountain Beaver M056 Beaver Neurotrichus gibbsii Aplodontia rufa Castor canadensis M009 Broad-footed Mole M033 Alpine Chipmunk M057 Western Harvest Mouse Scapanus latimanus Eutamias alpinus Reithrodontomys megalotis M010 Little Brown Myotis M034 Least Chipmunk M058 California Mouse Myotis lucifugus Eutamias minimus Peromyscus californicus M011 Yuma Myotis M035 Yellow Pine Chipmunk M059 Deer Mouse Myotis yumanensis Eutamias amoenus Peromyscus maniculatus M012 Long-eared Myotis M036 Allen's Chipmunk M060 Brush Mouse Myotis evotis Eutamias senex Peromyscus boylii M013 Fringed Myotis M037 Sonoma Chipmunk M061 Piñon Mouse Myotis thysanodes
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Assessment
    Town of Los Gatos 15215 Shannon Road Planned Development Application PD-15-001 Initial Study | Appendices Attachment 2 Biological Resources Assessment 2/4/16 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR 10 RESERVOIR ROAD LOS GATOS, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 18, 2015 Prepared for: Geier & Geier Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 5054 Berkeley, CA 94705‐5054 Prepared by: Wood Biological Consulting, Inc. 65 Alta Hill Way Walnut Creek, CA 94595 (925) 899‐1282 mike@wood‐biological.com The information provided in this document is intended solely for the use and benefit of Geier & Geier Consulting, Inc. and the Town of Los Gatos. No other person or entity shall be entitled to rely on the services, opinions, recommendations, plans or specifications provided herein, without the express written consent of Wood Biological Consulting, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODS AND LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................. 1 3.0 SETTING ...................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 PLANT COMMUNITIES
    [Show full text]
  • Tamias Ruficaudus Simulans, Red-Tailed Chipmunk
    Conservation Assessment for the Red-Tailed Chipmunk (Tamias ruficaudus simulans) in Washington Jennifer Gervais May 2015 Oregon Wildlife Institute Disclaimer This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the red-tailed chipmunk (Tamias ruficaudus simulans). If you have information that will assist in conserving this species or questions concerning this Conservation Assessment, please contact the interagency Conservation Planning Coordinator for Region 6 Forest Service, BLM OR/WA in Portland, Oregon, via the Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program website at http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/sfpnw/issssp/contactus/ U.S.D.A. Forest Service Region 6 and U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program Executive Summary Species: Red-tailed chipmunk (Tamias ruficaudus) Taxonomic Group: Mammal Management Status: The red-tailed chipmunk is considered abundant through most of its range in western North America, but it is highly localized in Alberta, British Columbia, and Washington (Jacques 2000, Fig. 1). The species is made up of two fairly distinct subspecies, T. r. simulans in the western half of its range, including Washington, and T. r. ruficaudus in the east (e.g., Good and Sullivan 2001, Hird and Sullivan 2009). In British Columbia, T. r. simulans is listed as Provincial S3 or of conservation concern and is on the provincial Blue List (BC Conservation Data Centre 2014). The Washington Natural Heritage Program lists the red-tailed chipmunk’s global rank as G2, “critically imperiled globally because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extinction,” and its state status as S2 although the S2 rank is uncertain.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Reproduction of the Mole Salamander Ambystoma Talpoideum in Captivity, with an Emphasis on Stimuli Environmental Determinants
    SHORT NOTE The Herpetological Bulletin 141, 2017: 28-31 Successful reproduction of the mole salamander Ambystoma talpoideum in captivity, with an emphasis on stimuli environmental determinants AXEL HERNANDEZ Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technics, University Pasquale Paoli of Corsica, Corte, 20250, France Author Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT - Generating and promoting evidence-based husbandry protocols for urodeles, commonly known as newts and salamanders, is urgently needed because most of the up-to-date ex situ programs are focused on frogs and toads than Urodela. Data on biology, life history, ecology and environmental parameters are lacking for many species and are needed to establish suitable husbandry and breeding conditions in captive environments. Two adult females and two adult males, of the mole salamander Ambystoma talpoideum successfully reproduced in captivity. It was found that reproduction of this species depends on various complex stimuli: including natural photoperiod 12:12, rainwater (acidic to neutral pH) and an aquarium full of various debris. Additionally high temperature variations ranging from 2 °C to 17 °C (a decrease followed by an increase) between November and February showed that it is possible to breed adults in aquariums provided the right stimuli are applied at the right moment of time in winter. A. talpoideum shows an explosive breeding mode as previously reported for the whole genus Ambystoma. INTRODUCTION with an emphasis on the environmental determinant stimuli involved. These data may assist in improving breeding these ince the 1980s, the current global amphibian extinction salamanders under artificial conditions. crisis has been discussed and acknowledged (Wake, A.
    [Show full text]
  • EARTH Ltd PME Threatened Habitats Handout
    501-C-3 at Southwick’s Zoo, 2 Southwick Street, Mendon, MA 01756 PROTECTING MY EARTH: LOCALLY THREATENED HABITATS (MA) FACTS & FIGURES “Protecting My EARTH” is an environmental education program offered by EARTH Ltd. to help students learn how to take better care of their community and their planet. KEY TERMS AND DEFINITIONS • Conservation: a careful preservation and protection of something; especially planned management of a natural resource to prevent exploitation, destruction, or neglect • Habitat: the place or environment where a plant or animal naturally or normally lives and grows • Ecosystem: everything that exists in a particular environment • Endangered: a species in danger of becoming extinct • Extinct: no longer existing • Threatened: having an uncertain chance of continued survival; likely to become an endangered species • Vulnerable: easily damaged; likely to become an endangered species • CITES - Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora: an international agreement between governments effective since 1975. Its aim is to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival. Roughly 5,600 species of animals and 30,000 species of plants are protected by CITES as of 2013. There are currently 181 countries (of about 196) that are contracting parties. • IUCN - International Union for the Conservation of Nature: world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with almost 1,300 government and NGO Members and more than 15,000 volunteer experts in 185 countries. Their work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature-based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Ixobrychus Exilis (Gmelin) Leastleast Bitternbittern, Page 1
    Ixobrychus exilis (Gmelin) Leastleast Bitternbittern, Page 1 State Distribution Best Survey Period Copyright The Otter Side Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Status: State threatened state.” Wood (1951) identified the species as a summer resident and common in southern tiers of counties and Global and state rank: G5/S2 Cheboygan County, but rare and local in the Upper Peninsula. Least bittern was later described by Payne Family: Ardeidae – Herons, Egrets, and Bitterns (1983) as an uncommon transient and summer resident, with nesting confirmed in 27 counties. Michigan Total range: Five subspecies of least bittern are found Breeding Bird Atlas (Atlas) surveys conducted in the throughout much of North, Central, and South America 1980s confirmed breeding in 20 survey blocks in 17 (Gibbs et al. 1992). In North America, this species is counties (Adams 1991). All of these observations primarily restricted to the eastern U.S., ranging from occurred in the Lower Peninsula, with the number of the Great Plains states eastward to the Atlantic Coast blocks and counties with confirmed breeding nearly split and north to the Great Lakes region and the New between the northern (9 blocks in 8 counties) and England states (Evers 1994). Western populations are southern (11 blocks in 9 counties) Lower Peninsula concentrated in low-lying areas of the Central Valley (Adams 1991). Researchers confirmed nesting at and Modoc Plateau of California, the Klamath and several sites on Saginaw Bay and observed possible Malheur basins of Oregon, and along the Colorado breeding in Munuscong Bay wetlands (Chippewa River in southwest Arizona and southeast California County) during avian studies conducted in the mid- (Gibbs et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Page
    BIOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY FOR WOODVILLE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT’S WATER WELL REPLACEMENT PROJECT ( NEAR WOODVILLE, TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ) Prepared for Woodville Public Utility District P.O. Box 4567 16716 Avenue 168 Woodville, CA 93258 (559) 686-9649 September 2019 Prepared by HALSTEAD & ASSOCIATES Environmental / Biological Consultants 296 Burgan Avenue, Clovis, CA 93611 Office (559) 298-2334; Mobile (559) 970-2875 Fax (559) 322-0769; [email protected] Table of Contents Page 1. Summary ..............................................................................................................................1 2. Background ..........................................................................................................................2 3. Project Location ...................................................................................................................2 4. Project Description...............................................................................................................2 5. Project Site Description .......................................................................................................2 6. Regulatory Overview ...........................................................................................................3 7. Survey Methods ...................................................................................................................7 8. Wildlife Resources in the Project Area ................................................................................8
    [Show full text]