DOCSLIB.ORG

Coyote Control: a Simulation Evaluation of Alternative Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coyote Control: a Simulation Evaluation of Alternative Strategies '1 C.3 COYOTE CONTROL: A SIMULATION EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES Russell L. Gum Louise M. Arthur Richard S. Magleby U.S. Department of Agriculture Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service Agricultural Economic Report No. 408 COYOTE CONTROL: A SIMULATION EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES, by Russell L. Gum, Louise M. Arthur^ and Richard S. Magleby. Natural Resource Economics Division, Economics. Statistics,.and Cooperatives Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 408- ABSTRACT Current and alternative coyote control strategies in the Western United States are evaluated via a computerized simulation model which predicts the economic and socio-environmental impacts of each strategy. A gradual decrease in lamb losses and an increase in net economic benefits are predicted if the 1974 level of coyote control. $7 million. is increased to $20 million. Socio-environmental benefits did not change significantly under that simulation. Beyond the $20 million level of expenditures, net economic benefits are predicted to decline slightly and socio-environmental benefits decline rapidly. At expenditures below 197^ levels, both economic and socio-environmental benefits decline substantially. Changes in mixes of control methods are discovered which permit both economic and socio-environmental benefits to increase. These alternatives include increased use of the M-44 and aerial gunning and decreased use of traps. Key words: Coyotes, Predator control. Sheep losses. Simulation, Environmental evaluation. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Russell L. Gum and Louise M. Arthur are, respectively, agricultural economist and social science research analyst. Natural Resource Economics Division, Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service (ESCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture, stationed at the Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson. Richard S. Magleby is an ESCS agricultural economist in Washington, D.C. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors appreciate the data and consultation from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and the helpful suggestions from W. E. Martin, University of Arizona, and the many other reviewers of this manuscript. Washington, D.C. 20250 July 1978 FOREWORD Ihig report presents results of a simulation evaluation of the economic, environmental, and social benefits and costs of present and alternative policies for control of coyotes in the Western United States, The simulation results depend heavily on hypotheses about relationships among coyote control, coyotes, sheep and larri) losses, and other environmental effects. These hypotheses and the analyses are based on the most reliable data available and on judgments of experts in coyote control. As more data become available, the hypotheses can be revised to describe the control situation more precisely. Meanwhile, this simulation is considered a reasonable approximation of me current situation, with the results providing valuable information for decisionmaking on the control issue. The research was conducted by the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, in cooperation with State universities, at the direct request of Congress. On January 1. 1978 the Economic Research Service was merged with the Statistical Reporting Service and the Farmer Cooperative Service to form the Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service. Special appropriations by Congress in fiscal years 1974 and 1975 funded the research. Other reports in the series focused on characteristics of the sheep industry, levels of sheep and lamb losses, reasons for the decline of sheep production in the West, and costs and returns of western sheep producers. CONTENTS Highlights ii Synopses of Other Reports in this Series ili Introduction 1 The Simulation Model 3 Function of Each Component of the Model 4 Use of the Model's Two Final Outputs 5 Socio-environmental Considerations 6 Economic Considerations 14 Simulation Results 15 Changing Only Expenditure Levels Ih Increasing Expenditures on Each Method in Turn l8 Changing Both Expenditures and Method Mix 18 Conclusions 20 Research Recommendations 22 References 23 Appendix A: Control Methods and 1974 Expenditures 25 Federal Control Efforts 25 Private Control Efforts 25 Total Control Efforts 3I Appendix B: Technical Aspects of the Simulation 33 Socio-environmental Evaluation Methodology 33 Cross Impact Simulation of Control/Coyote/Lamb Loss Relationships . 37 Impacts of Coyote Control on Other Wildlife 41 Economic Impact Evaluation Methodology 42 Appendix C: User's Guide to the Coyote Control Inforrration System .... 45 HIGHLIGHTS Coyote control programs in the Western United States involve Federal, State, and private expenditures on various control methods. Throu^ use of a computerized simulation model, predictions are made of the economic and SOCIO-environmental impacts of actual and alternative expenditure levels for these methods. Economic impacts represent those on producers of lambs and sheep, plus those on consumers of lamb and mutton. Socio-environmental impacts include public acceptability of methods (humaneness, selectivity, and cost effectiveness), coyote population changes, and impacts of coyotes on other wildlife. The computerized simulation model facilitates consideration of control alternatives by (1) making explicit the key relationships affecting the impacts of control, (2) permitting changes in the relationships to reflect the best data, judgment, and experience available, (3) rapidly calculating both economic and environmental impacts, and (4) presenting the results so that the impacts and impact tradeoffs of alternatives can be compared easily. However, the model and impacts reported here represent first approximations and should be used as supplements to judgment and experience. Key relationships in the model need validation and refinement as better data and analyses become available. According to the model, increases in expenditures from $7 million to $20 million on the same mix of controls would result in a decrease in coyote population levels, a gradual decrease in lamb losses (from 8 percent down to 4 percent), and a slight increase in net economic benefits. Overall socio-environmental benefits did not change significantly. Beyond the $20 million level of expenditures, net economic benefits would decline slightly and socio-environmental benefits would decline rapidly. At control levels below 1974 levels, both economic and socio-environmental benefits would decline substantially. Alternative mixes of control methods are found for which predicted economic and socio-environmental benefits increased. The mixes of control methods yielding the highest economic benefits included increased use of toxicants—presently limited by legal restrictions—and decreased use of trapping. Predicted socio-environmental benefits are enhanced by decreasing expenditures on trapping and increasing expenditures on the M-44 cyanide ejector and aerial gunning. Research needed to support decisionmaking on predator control should aim for better methods for (1; measuring and monitoring livestock losses on a continuing basis, (¿) predicting losses as a function of control, coyote population, and management practices, and (3) determining impacts on gams species. Additional needs include better data on coyote numbers and coyotes taken by sport hunting and fur trappers. 11 SYNOPSES OF OTHER REPORTS IN THIS SERIES "Characteristics of Sheep Production in the Western United States" by C. Kerry Gee and Richard S. Magleby Agricultural Economic Report No. 3^5. About 80 percent of the sheep in the United States are raised in the West, where extensive private and public ranges provide the bulk of the feed. Only about 41 percent of the West's sheep producers have commercial scale operations of 50 head or more, but they own nearly 93 percent of the region's sheep. About one-third of these commercial producers have specialized in sheep, v*iile two-thirds have diversified livestock operations. More than two-thirds operate as sole proprietors, while me rest have formed partnerships and family corporations. Many have substantial equity positions which indicate past profitability. About one-fifth will likely be retiring in the next 10 years, viiich could result in many operations going out of sheep Production. About half of the feed requirement for commercial sheep comes rom private range, while public range supplies one-fifth. Over half of the commercial sheep are grazed under tiie care of herders, usually on open range. Most lambing occurs in late winter and early spring. More commercial producers practice shed lambing than range lambing, but the number of sheep involved is less. The principal marketing problem is the few number of buyers bidding on lambs. "Sheep and Lamb Losses to Predators and Other Causes in the Western United States" by C. Kerry Gee, Richard Magleby, Warren R. Bailey, Russell L. Gum, and Louise M. Arthur Agricultural Economic Report No. 369 Predators, principally coyotes, are the major cause of lamb and sheep losses in the Western United States, according to 9,000 farmers and ranchers surveyed in 1974. Rates of loss to coyotes varied considerably amjng farmers and ranchers; vhile many had no or minor prédation problems, others reported very high losses. Overall, in the Western United States, losses attributed to coyotes in 197^ numbered 728,000 lambs (more than 8 percent of all lambs born) and 229,000 adult sheep (more than 2 percent of inventory), representing a third of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exploring the Relationship Between Militarization in the United States
    Exploring the Relationship Between Militarization in the United States and Crime Syndicates in Mexico: A Look at the Legislative Impact on the Pace of Cartel Militarization by Tracy Lynn Maish A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Criminology and Criminal Justice) in the University of Michigan-Dearborn 2021 Master Thesis Committee: Assistant Professor Maya P. Barak, Chair Associate Professor Kevin E. Early Associate Professor Donald E. Shelton Tracy Maish [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8834-4323 © Tracy L. Maish 2021 Acknowledgments The author would like to acknowledge the assistance of their committee and the impact that their guidance had on the process. Without the valuable feedback and enormous patience, this project would not the where it is today. Thank you to Dr. Maya Barak, Dr. Kevin Early, and Dr. Donald Shelton. Your academic mentorship will not be forgotten. ii Table of Contents 1. Acknowledgments ii 2. List of Tables iv 3. List of Figures v 4. Abstract vi 5. Chapter 1 Introduction 1 6. Chapter 2 The Militarization of Law Enforcement Within the United States 8 7. Chapter 3 Cartel Militarization 54 8. Chapter 4 The Look into a Mindset 73 9. Chapter 5 Research Findings 93 10. Chapter 6 Conclusion 108 11. References 112 iii List of Tables Table 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 80 Table 2 .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S3775
    April 18, 2005 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S3775 I may have agreed with it. I may Dorgan/Durbin amendment No. 399, to pro- PROHIBITION ON TERMINATION OF EXISTING have disagreed. I did not want to see us hibit the continuation of the independent JOINT-SERVICE MULTIYEAR PRO- counsel investigation of Henry Cisneros past CUREMENT CONTRACT FOR C/KC- making the Senate into some kind of a 130J AIRCRAFT June 1, 2005 and request an accounting of supreme court that would overturn any SEC. 1122. No funds appropriated or other- costs from GAO. wise made available by this Act, or any decision we didn’t like. On the way out, Reid amendment No. 445, to achieve an ac- other Act, may be obligated or expended to the third Senator came up to Lowell celeration and expansion of efforts to recon- terminate the joint service multiyear pro- Weicker and myself and linked his arm struct and rehabilitate Iraq and to reduce curement contract for C/KC-130J aircraft in ours, and he said: We are the only the future risks to United States Armed that is in effect on the date of the enactment Forces personnel and future costs to United true conservatives on this floor be- of this Act. cause we want to protect the Constitu- States taxpayers, by ensuring that the peo- AMENDMENT NO. 418, AS MODIFIED tion and not make these changes. ple of Iraq and other nations do their fair Mr. CHAMBLISS. Mr. President, I I turned to him and I said: Senator share to secure and rebuild Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • COYOTES Animal Damage Control Lakewood, Colorado 80228
    Jeffrey S. Green Assistant Regional Director USDA-APHIS- COYOTES Animal Damage Control Lakewood, Colorado 80228 F. Robert Henderson Extension Specialist Animal Damage Control Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas 66506-1600 Mark D. Collinge State Director USDA-APHIS- Animal Damage Control Boise, Idaho 83705 Fig. 1. Coyote, Canis latrans Damage Prevention and Shed lambing, kidding, and calving Toxicants usually reduce coyote predation. Control Methods M-44 ejector devices for use with Remove carrion to help limit coyote sodium cyanide-loaded plastic Exclusion populations. capsules. They are most effective Produce livestock in confinement. Frightening Agents and during cold weather (fall to spring). Repellents Herd livestock into pens at night. Livestock protection collars (LPC) Guarding dogs: Some dogs have containing Compound 1080 Exclusion fences (net-wire and/or (sodium monofluoroacetate) are electric), properly constructed and significantly reduced coyote predation. registered for use only in certain maintained, can aid significantly in states. reducing predation. Donkeys and llamas: Some are Fumigants Cultural Methods and aggressive toward canines and have Habitat Modification reduced coyote predation. Gas cartridges are registered as a burrow (den) fumigant. Select pastures that have a lower Sonic and visual repellents: Strobe incidence of predation to reduce lights, sirens, propane cannons, and Trapping exposure of livestock to predation. others have reduced predation on both sheep and calves. Leghold traps (Nos. 3 and 4) are Herding of livestock generally reduces effective and are the most versatile Chemical odor and taste repellents: predation due to human presence control tool. during the herding period. None have shown sufficient effectiveness to be registered for Snares are effective where coyotes pass Change lambing, kidding, and calving use.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Re-Thinking
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Re -thinking the Immigrant Narrative in a Global Perspective: Representations of Labor, Gender and Im/migration in Contemporary Cultural Productions A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requireme nt s for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Literature by Irene Mata Committee in charge: Professor Rosaura Sánchez, Chair Professor Michael Davidson Professor Jorge Huerta Professor Lisa Lowe Professor Shelley Streeby 2007 Copyright Irene Mata, 2007 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Irene Mata is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm. Chair University of California , San Diego 2007 iii DEDICATION Par a mi madre , Irene Martinez de Mata . iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page…………………………………………………… .. ……… ….iii Dedication………………………………………………………………… .... ..iv Table of Contents……………………………………………………… …... …v Acknowledgements……………………………………………………… ... ....vi Vita……………………………………… ……………………………… ... ... vii i Abstract……………………………………………………………… .. ... ……ix Introduction………………………………………………………… .…… .….1 Chapter One : Up by Their Bootstraps or Can you D ance the Spanglish Lambada in the Barrio, Pocho?: The Immigrant Narrative Across Time, Place and Gender in Pocho , Barrio Boy , Spanglish and The Forbidden Dance is the Lambada .……………………………………………………. ... 25 Chapter Two : Alternative Narratives: Representations of Domestic Labor and Immigration in the Southwest .. ………………………………………. ... 71 Chapte r Three : “Ab ove All…Strive to be Invisible.” From the Suburbs to the Hotel: Representations of Domestic Labor in the Northeast U.S ………12 4 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………. 18 1 References.. ………………………………… ……………………………... 19 1 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to the Center for the Study of Race and Ethnicity and the Department of Literature for helping to fund my research and writing. I would like to acknowledge all of the help and guidance from my committee members .
    [Show full text]
  • The Heart of an Industry: the Role of the Bracero Program in the Growth of Viticulture in Sonoma and Napa Counties
    THE HEART OF AN INDUSTRY: THE ROLE OF THE BRACERO PROGRAM IN THE GROWTH OF VITICULTURE IN SONOMA AND NAPA COUNTIES by Zachary A. Lawrence A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Copyright 2005 By Zachary A. Lawrence ii AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRODUCTION OF MASTER’S THESIS I grant permission for the reproduction of parts of this thesis without further authorization from me, on the condition that the person or agency requesting reproduction absorbs the cost and provide proper acknowledgement of authorship. Permission to reproduce this thesis in its entirety must be obtained from me. iii THE HEART OF AN INDUSTRY: THE ROLE OF THE BRACERO PROGRAM IN THE GROWTH OF VITICULTURE IN SONOMA AND NAPA COUNTIES Thesis by Zachary A. Lawrence ABSTRACT This study examines the role of the Bracero Program in the growth of Sonoma and Napa County viticulture in an attempt to understand how important bracero labor was to the industry. While most histories of the Bracero Program are nationwide or statewide in scope, this study explores the regional complexities of how and why the program was used in Sonoma and Napa Counties, how both the growers and laborers in the region felt about it, and how this was different from and similar to other regions. Government documents provided the statistics necessary to determine the demographic changes in the region due to the Bracero Program. Important primary source material that provided the human side of the story includes a number of oral history interviews I conducted, the collection of Wine Industry Oral Histories, and various regional newspaper articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Border Enforcement Backfired
    Why Border Enforcement Backfired1 Douglas S. Massey Princeton University Jorge Durand Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas Karen A. Pren Princeton University In this article the authors undertake a systematic analysis of why border enforcement backfired as a strategy of immigration control in the United States. They argue theoretically that border enforcement emerged as a policy response to a moral panic about the perceived threat of Latino immigration to the United States propounded by self- interested bureaucrats, politicians, and pundits who sought to mobi- lize political and material resources for their own benefit. The end re- sult was a self-perpetuating cycle of rising enforcement and increased apprehensions that resulted in the militarization of the border in a way that was disconnected from the actual size of the undocumented flow. Using an instrumental variable approach, the authors show how border militarization affected the behavior of unauthorized migrants and border outcomes to transform undocumented Mexican migra- tion from a circular flow of male workers going to three states into an 11 million person population of settled families living in 50 states. From 1986 to 2008 the undocumented population of the United States grew from 3 million to 12 million persons, despite a fivefold increase in the num- 1 The authors would like to thank National Institute of Child Health and Human Development for its support from grants 2 P2C HD047879 and 2 RO1 HD035643 as well as the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation for its generous support of the Mexican Migration Project. Direct correspondence to Douglas S. Massey, Department of Sociology, Princeton University, Wallace Hall, Princeton, New Jersey 08544.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources on Mental Health Practices, Medical Emergencies, and Are Holding Virtual Appointments for Prescription Refills, Or Health Education Appointments
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN BERNARDINO Success and wellness programs (Counseling and Psychological Services, Student Health Center, CARE Team) Student Health Center All CSUSB students are now eligible for vaccination, they are providing the link: COVID-19 immunization appointments. for vaccination appointments All students can find resources on mental health practices, medical emergencies, and are holding virtual appointments for prescription refills, or health education appointments. CARE Team They have two grants which can be given to international students and regular students,: COVID-19 Emergency Grants: One time $300 grant, citizenship status does not affect eligibility Basic Needs Emergency Grants: One time $500 grant, The Den Provide essential groceries to students in need. CalFresh Support International students must have health insurance coverage, they can sign up with relations.com. Relations are partnered with Anthem, meaning all anthem in-network providers can provide care. The annual premium is $1,229.16, which covers the school year, can buy for individual terms.No chargers for doctor visits and tier 1,2,3,4 prescriptions. https://4studenthealth.relationinsurance.com/wp-content/uploads/20-21_CSUSB_Snapshot.pdf Scholarships for undocumented students Resource guide provided https://www.csusb.edu/undocumented-student-success-center/resources/scholarships DACA application help Free legal services for the DACA application process for CSUSB students and immediate families https://carecenla.simplybook.me/v2/ Coyote Dreamers Ally Network (CDAN) is offering two emergency grants for DREAMers General emergency grant offers up to $500 for rent, medical services, books,etc Legal Fees Emergency grant offers up to $500 to students who are looking for expense coverage (attorney fees or immigration fees) Application: https://www.csusb.edu/undocumented-student-success-center/cdan-emergency-grant Financial Aid for DREAMers AB 540 and DACA students are able to apply for the California Dream Act and for CSUSB scholarships.
    [Show full text]
  • CEQ Unified Agenda
    CEQ Unified Agenda From: "Szabo, Aaron L. EOP/CEQ" "Elizabeth Harris-Marshall - M1V1 E ([email protected])" <liz.harris­ To: [email protected]> Cc: "Szabo, Aaron L. EOP/CEQ" Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:35:33 -0500 Attachments CEQ Unified Agenda Entries--Spring 2018_Final.docx (26.14 kB) Liz, Based on our phone call, please see CEQ's unified agenda. Thank you and let me know if there is anything else that you need. Aaron L. Szabo Senior Counsel Council on Environmental Quality (Desk) (Ce1I) CEQ075 FY 18150_ 000002537 CEQ075FY18150_000002538 2 CEQ075FY18150_000002538 3 CEQ075FY18150_000002538 4 CEQ075FY18150_000002538 5 CEQ075FY18150_000002538 Draft ANPRM for NEPA Regulations "Szabo, Aaron L. EOP/CEQ" <"/o=exchange organization/ou=exchange From: administrative group (fydibohf23spdlt)/cn=recipients/cn=f93a8d 1dd2b4420ca81 e53ff8199b780-sz"> "Pettigrew, Theresa L. EOP/CEQ" "Schneider, To: Daniel J. EOP/CEQ" Date: Mon, 30 Apr 201810:49:19-0400 Attachments FR Notice for ANPRM - 4-20-2018.docx (52.74 kB) Theresa and Dan, Per our conversation, please find attached the draft Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the NEPA regulations. Unless something changes, this should be the version that will be sent over to OIRA for interagency review. If you have any questions related to the content or process, please let me know. Aaron L. Szabo Senior Counsel Council on Environmental Quality (Desk) Cell CEQ075 FY 18150_ 000002527 CEQ075FY18150_000002528 2 CEQ075FY18150_000002528 3 CEQ075FY18150_000002528 4 CEQ075FY18150_000002528 5 CEQ075FY18150_000002528
    [Show full text]
  • THE US IMMIGRATION SYSTEM: Principles, Interests, and Policy Proposals to Guide Long-Term Reform
    JANUARY 2018 THE US IMMIGRATION SYSTEM: Principles, Interests, and Policy Proposals to Guide Long-Term Reform S1 Moving Beyond Comprehensive Immigration Reform S163 Separated Families: Barriers to Family Reunification and Trump: Principles, Interests, and Policies to Guide After Deportation Long-Term Reform of the US Immigration System DEBORAH A. BOEHM DONALD KERWIN S179 US Immigration Policy and the Case for Family Unity S37 Making America 1920 Again? Nativism and US ZOYA GUBERNSKAYA and JOANNA DREBY Immigration, Past and Present JULIA G. YOUNG S193 Creating Cohesive, Coherent Immigration Policy PIA O. ORRENIUS and MADELINE ZAVODNY S56 Working Together: Building Successful Policy and Program Partnerships for Immigrant Integration S207 Segmentation and the Role of Labor Standards ELS DE GRAAUW and IRENE BLOEMRAAD Enforcement in Immigration Reform JANICE FINE and GREGORY LYON S75 Citizenship After Trump PETER J. SPIRO S228 Mainstreaming Involuntary Migration in Development Policies S84 Enforcement, Integration, and the Future of JOHN W. HARBESON Immigration Federalism CRISTINA RODRIGUEZ S233 Immigration Policy and Agriculture: Possible Directions for the Future S116 Is Border Enforcement Effective? What We Know and PHILIP MARTIN What It Means EDWARD ALDEN S244 National Interests and Common Ground in the US Immigration Debate: How to Legalize the US S126 Immigration Adjudication: The Missing “Rule of Law” Immigration System and Permanently Reduce Its LENNI B. BENSON Undocumented Population DONALD KERWIN and ROBERT WARREN S151 The Promise of a Subject-Centered Approach to Understanding Immigration Noncompliance in the United States EMILY RYO A publication of the Executive Editor: Donald Kerwin Lynn Shotwell Executive Director, Center for Migration Studies Council for Global Immigration Associate Editors: Margaret Stock John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrant Anxieties:1990S Immigration Reform and The
    IMMIGRANT ANXIETIES: 1990S IMMIGRATION REFORM AND THE NEOLIBERAL CONSENSUS Christina Gerken A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2007 Committee: Robert Buffington, Advisor I-Fen Lin Graduate Faculty Representative Susana Peña Ellen Berry © 2007 Christina Gerken All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Robert Buffington, Advisor Immigrant Anxieties: 1990s Immigration Reform and the Neoliberal Consensus concentrates on the discursive intersections between immigration, anti-terrorism, and welfare reform that developed in the mid-1990s debates over immigration reform in the United States. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s work, this project analyzes the discursive strategies that created, shaped, and upheld a race-specific image of a “desirable” immigrant. I argue that government debates, media discourse, and public perception were part of a larger regime of knowledge/power that continually produced and reinforced the neoliberal ideal of a responsible, self-sufficient subject. This underlying neoliberal logic with its reductionist insistence on cost-benefit analysis foreclosed any attempt to engage in a serious moral/ethical debate about the merits and effects of the U.S. immigration system. At the same time, my research demonstrates that despite this foreclosure of the terms of debate, the mid-1990s discourse on immigration was characterized by a productive tension between its underlying neoliberal assumptions and other often contradictory values and objectives. In addition, I interrogate how long-standing and deep-seated anxieties about immigrants’ race, class, gender, and sexuality intersected with neoliberal logic in both the public discourse and the legislative process.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 149 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 31, 2003 No. 156 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 2003, at 12:30 p.m. Senate FRIDAY, OCTOBER 31, 2003 The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY on a fair credit reporting bill. I expect called to order by the President pro LEADER the Senate would turn to that measure tempore [Mr. STEVENS]. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The on Tuesday. majority leader is recognized. I mentioned a few moments ago the Internet tax moratorium bill. What we PRAYER f agreed to last night was that we would The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- SCHEDULE address that bill next week, and as part fered the following prayer: Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, this morn- of that agreement, that we would not Let us pray. ing we will be in a period of morning address it prior to Thursday. With the O God, our strength and refuge, who business to allow Senators to speak for current extension expiring, it was my shows us unfailing love, we see Your up to 10 minutes each. As I announced hope that the Senate could have fin- majesty in the beauty of the Earth and last night, there will be no rollcall ished that bill last night or today, the glory of the skies. Your voice votes during today’s session.
    [Show full text]
  • United States
    United States - Mexico Walls, Abuses, and Deaths at the Borders Flagrant Violations of the Rights of Undocumented Migrants on their Way to the United States FIDH’s photo 2007 March 2008 - N°488/2 United States - Mexico Walls, Abuses, and Deaths at the Borders Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................................4 1. Mission’s Agenda ......................................................................................................................................................4 2. Acknowledgments.....................................................................................................................................................6 I GENERAL CONTEXT OF THE MIGRATION FLOWS BETWEEN CENTRAL AMERICA, MEXICO, AND THE UNITED STATES .........................................................................................................................................................7 1. Mass Migration Due to Multiple Causes ..................................................................................................................8 2. Inconsistent National Policies which Infringe on Human Rights ............................................................................10 II LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...........................................................................................................................................16 1. Mexican Legislation ................................................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]