The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations IMPACT FACTOR – (ISSN 2689-100x) 2020: 5. 525 Published: November 28, 2020 | Pages: 219-223 Doi: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume02Issue11-39 OCLC - 1121105668

Some Morphological Characteristics Of Uzbek Dialects

Rakhmonov Navruz Sattorovich (Phd) Navoi State Pedagogical Institute,

Journal Website: http://usajournalshub.c om/index,php/tajssei

Copyright: Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the creative commons attributes 4.0 licence.

ABSTRACT It is well known that dialects are an invaluable spiritual heritage that preserves the mental characteristics of the people. Therefore, the collection of dialect materials and their study in modern areas, along with traditional methods of linguistics and draws scientific conclusions. In Uzbek linguistics, one of the priorities is the creation of dictionaries on dialects and the creation of dialectal atlases. In this article, some morphological features of Uzbek dialects are analyzed in lingvoareal, comparative-historical and descriptive methods.

KEYWORDS Dialect, dialectal atlas, lingvoareal, morphological form, linguistic landscape, dictionary, ethnic diversity

INTRODUCTION

In studying the current state of the dialectal dialects in the use of morphological forms in linguistic landscape of Navoi region, which is Uzbek dialects, as well as specific features of the object of our research, the study of the the dialect. Such differences are due to factors morphological features of Uzbek dialects in such as the location of the dialect, historical the region will undoubtedly provide valuable conditions, ethnic diversity, population materials to determine the linguistic nature of migration, as well as the influence of Uzbek the grammatical structure of the Uzbek dialects in the neighboring region. language. This is due to the fact that the region has many similarities with other Uzbek

The USA Journals Volume 02 Issue 11 -2020 219 The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations IMPACT FACTOR – (ISSN 2689-100x) 2020: 5. 525 Published: November 28, 2020 | Pages: 219-223 Doi: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume02Issue11-39 OCLC - 1121105668

As early as the 11th century, Mahmud Kashgari person plural literary language is a typical

noted that in Oguz and Kipchak, "for the sake phenomenon for the Qarluq and mixed Uzbek of ease of pronunciation ..." some sounds dialects of the region. The transition of ng to y were omitted in oral speech [7, 69]. It should between two vowels may have changed from be noted that in Uzbek dialects, too, the - (') ng'z as a result of [ng> y]: [- (') hundred principles of simplicity and economy apply to <(') ng'z]; ͻtәngz> ͻtәyz, koz'ngz> koz'i'z> the combination of certain adjectives and koz': z> koz'z [12, 146]. In general, the second words, as required by ease of pronunciation. person plural - (') face form is typical of Qarluq-type Uzbek dialects and is also found MATERIALS AND METHODS in Osh, Uzgen, Jalal-Abad, Namangan, Lower Odamla (Odamlar- in literary language) Kashkadarya, Kattakurgan, Tashkent, Jizzakh meaning: people, biza // bizar (Bizlar- in literary dialects. The peculiarity of this fact is that in language) meaning: we, kitabiz (Kitobingiz- in the Kipchak-type dialects of the region, such literary language) meaning: your book, as Oltinsoy, Xonaqa, Kuksaroy, Dorman, as a uyinsqa bͻring (uyingizga boring- in literary result of the influence of Qarluq-type dialects, language) meaning: go home, ke: ng (Keling- the (-) face form is actively used. in literary language) meaning: come, In the bilingual (Uzbek-Tajik) Kyzyltepa, welcome, o: ng (oling- in literary language) Nurata, Ghazgan dialects of Navoi region, meaning: take, help yourself. It should be there are variants of the possessive suffix - noted that Navoi region has similarities with um, -ung: oglum, oglung, bͻgum, bͻgung, other Uzbek dialects in the use of Uzbek chirogum, chirͻgung. This variant of the dialects, as well as other Uzbek dialects, but at possessive suffix is also found in the bilingual the same time as a product of a long historical dialects of the neighboring Bukhara region [9, process, the dialects developed against the 46]. In regional dialects, as a result of the background of external and internal addition of possessive suffixes, there are also influences. The Uzbek and Kazakh peoples sound-changing phenomena such as [q> g', k> have long lived side by side in the Navoi g, p> v]: taragim, 'staghm, kel' sͻv' (keli region, and in some areas mixed. This does dastasi), gav'ng (gaping). The area under not go unnoticed in this or that language. study is four indicators of the six conventions Including Kyzylcha of Nurata district; In the in the snow-type dialects, in which the dialects of Shurtepa and Kenagas villages of contraction and fall contractions do not differ. district, Uzbeks living mixed with Direction and place-time agreements are also Kazakhs have plural forms [-dar // -der, -tar // - applied in a mixed manner. It occurs mainly in tar]. Variants of the plural form [-dar // -der] Navoi, Samarkand, Bukhara, Karshi dialects. are also found in the dialects of Yangikurgan Although the indicators of these agreements district of Namangan region and Sherabad are the same, but each of them is an district of Surkhandarya region. The -dar // - independent agreement. Because they differ dar, -tar // -tar forms of the plural are also in their application, functions, semantic available in Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Bashkir, Tuva, and features. The - ә // -a form of the consonant is Altaic languages [14, 16]. The use of the suffix - used in the , Hazara, and (') instead of the suffix - (i) in the second dialects of the Qarluq type as part of the

The USA Journals Volume 02 Issue 11 -2020 220 The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations IMPACT FACTOR – (ISSN 2689-100x) 2020: 5. 525 Published: November 28, 2020 | Pages: 219-223 Doi: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume02Issue11-39 OCLC - 1121105668

words she: ra, o: ra, be: ra. It is known from key] is used by adding suffixes to the question

the dialectological literature that this form is pronouns and the meaning of the accent is the main morphological indicator of the expressed: as in әnakәy, mәnәkәy, qanikey dialects belonging to the Oghuz dialect. In the (where?). This situation is also observed in dialects under study, this form also appeared Karshi, Parkent and Samarkand dialects. as a result of the influence of the Bukhara RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Oghuz type dialects. Comparison: Karakul: she: ra, o: ra, be: ra; Khorezm: be: ra, shö: ra, In order to emphasize the meaning of the hö: ra [9, 65; 1, 173]. command-desire, the -gay form can sometimes be added in Kipchak-type dialects: The -ye form of the directional agreement is bͻragay, kelagay. Comparison: boragay – bora found in the Karmana, Hazara, and Kyzyltepa qol (stay – go), Kelagay – kela qol (stay – dialects of the Qarluq type. This suffix is added come); to words ending in a vowel: hͻvl'ye, kochaye, Buxͻrͻye. Comparison: In Kattakurgan:'ch'ye, In the regional dialects, the second person oz'ye; hovliye (yard) in Tashkent. plural form of the imperative mood

In Choya, , Qumrabod, Langar dialects It is formed by the suffixes [- (') ng / - (y) ng / - of Navoi region, the form of the verb -n, -in, yngiz / -yng'ys / -yngyz] and its meaning is which was used in Turkic languages until the directed to the plural, the general (except the XV century, has been preserved [3, 32; 4, 59- meaning of respect): ayting, ket'ng, ͻ: ng, ke: 61]: Erten ketemiz // Erta bilan ketamiz.( We ng, ko’ringiz, aytingiz, tushingiz. The -lar form leave tomorrow // We leave early; Kunun may also be added after these additions. In ishladi // Kuni bilan ishladi (He worked the day this case, sometimes there is a phenomenon // He worked the day); Tunun uhlmad // Tuni of narrowing of the verb structure [12, 129] bilan uhlamadi (He didn't sleep last night // He with the requirement of maximum didn't sleep at night). In these dialects, the simplification of pronunciation in oral speech: word tomorrow is also used in the sense of bͻr'zlә, ͻl'zlә (-'zlә> -ingizlar). The second tomorrow. In Soykechar dialect Erten op kep person plural forms also differ semantically. beraman (Ertaga olib kelib beraman) : I'll give Comparison: in Kipchak dialects: ke: ngner it to you tomorrow (I'll bring it tomorrow). (command, suggestion in relation to the general); kelzle // kel'ngzle (command, It is noteworthy that in the dialects of the suggestion to an elderly or respected person). study area, including Uyrot, Bahrin of Karmana district; In the Iranian dialects of Khatirchi Inter-dialectal variation of a morphological district, Tortuvli rural dialects, the (- i) mtir // - form in Uzbek dialects, the occurrence of (i) mtil forms of the reduced degree are also which in different phonetic forms is found in addition to the bitter quality, which associated with a number of ethnolinguistic expresses the meaning of taste: achqimtil factors. Morphological variability has also (more bitter). emerged in the studied dialects as a result of the interaction of the elements karluq, In the dialects of Baroq, Oqqula, Yangiabad kipchak, and in part Oguz. The analytic - (i) b villages of Nurata district [ene/mene], [-kәy, - edi form of the past tense has a different

The USA Journals Volume 02 Issue 11 -2020 221 The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations IMPACT FACTOR – (ISSN 2689-100x) 2020: 5. 525 Published: November 28, 2020 | Pages: 219-223 Doi: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume02Issue11-39 OCLC - 1121105668

appearance in the dialects under study. In the It is characteristic that in the dialects of

dialects of Kadak, Qirhovud, Qizilhovud, Uchtut and Kuksaroy villages there is an Nogora, Hasanota, Anna, Tutli, Tikanli, enlarged form “borayatuvdim” of the future Soykechar villages of Nurata district, which tense. Endi siznikiga borayturudim (Endi belong to the Kipchak dialect, the past tense siznikiga bormoqchi bolib turgandim) (I was verb form - (i) b edi is used in the form of (i) going to yours); ved: ket'ved', ayt'edim, barvi: Indigenous In Kipchak-type dialects, including the people - (i) vedi-used by Turkmens and the dialects of Eski and Chashma villages of areas where they live are called Jagalov Nurata district, the auxiliary verb yatdi is used (indicating that they are located on the edge in the Uzbek literary language to mean the of a mountain). There are also records that auxiliary verb yuribdi: Boleler enasinkiga keb- the so-called Nurata Turkmen ethnos spread ketb janitt. In literary language: The children to the territory of Jizzakh, Samarkand and come and go to their mother's house. In the Navoi regions [9, 33]. This form is also present dialects of Eski, Chashma, Samari, Ajrim in the dialects of Sarigul, Toz, Aymat, Mijgan, villages of Nurata district, the auxiliary verb to Jonbulak, Boronbulak villages of Koshrabat send in the literary language occurs in the district of Samarkand region. Comparison. form of a jar under the influence of Qarluq Khorezm (Kipchak): bar'vi: d'm, bar'vi: d'ng, type dialects: Suvdy ichibjar (drink water). In bar'vi: d', bar'vi: d'k, bar'vi: d'ngler, bar'vi: compare aytvordi, olivordi, in Qarluq dialect. d'(ler) [2, 165]; In the Uzbek dialects of Tajikistan: bͻr'ved'm [6, 25]. -ib ed form In the regional dialects, the -kar, -kir forms are Choya, Jarma, which is adjacent to the area; used in parallel with the -kaz, -kiz forms in the Occurs in the dialects of Sayyod, Toroma, Uzbek literary language. The analysis of Crimea, Kazakh villages of Khatirchi district: as dialectal materials collected from regional if I went and told. This form is also found in dialects shows that such forms are more the Turkestan group Qarluq-Kipchak [10, 122], widely used, mainly in the dialects of mixed Upper Kashkadarya Kipchak-type Uzbek and mixed types: o’zkazmoq // o’rtaqmoq dialects [5, 24]. In the Qarluq, Kipchak, and (pass), ketkizmoq // ketkirmoq(leave,) mixed dialects of the study area, the -uvdi itkazmoq // bitkarmoq (finish). The -kar // -kir form is widely used: bͻruvdim, aytuvding, forms of the accusative pronoun are widely uvluvdi. This form is mainly characteristic of all used in the written sources of the old Uzbek Uzbek dialects of the Qarluq type, and literary language, including Navoi's works: ... represents the meaning of an action These two people lost their lives… Verbs in performed in the distant past. the accusative pronoun in the Uzbek literary language such as aqizmoq (flow,)tomizmoq The past tense verb - (a) r edi is also found in (drip), emizmoq (soak). the dialects of the villages of Karmana and Kyzyltepa districts of Navoi region - (a) sdi: The -maslik suffix, which forms the infinitive bͻrasd'm, (went, )aytasd'ng,(told) b'lasd form of the noun, is mainly used in the Qarluq- (was/were) '. type (sometimes Kipchak-type) dialects of the region, while the -mash form is widely used in Kipchak and mixed-type dialects. -mash form

The USA Journals Volume 02 Issue 11 -2020 222 The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations IMPACT FACTOR – (ISSN 2689-100x) 2020: 5. 525 Published: November 28, 2020 | Pages: 219-223 Doi: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume02Issue11-39 OCLC - 1121105668

in Kipchak-type dialects, including Soykechar, 4. Abdurahmonov G., Shukurov Sh.

Choya, Jarma, Barak of Nurata district; Historical grammar of the Uzbek Chagatoy, Uchkara, Tasmachi, Kuksaroy, language., - T., 1973. Yangikishlak, Chechakota, Dovtepa of 5. Juraev B. Upper Kashkadarya Uzbek Khatirchi district; Yangikurgan, Ijand, Navruz, dialects. –T .: Science, 1969. Kalkanota, Burkut of mixed type of Navbahor 6. Yuldashev T. Uzbek dialects in Tajikistan. district; Widespread in Shurtepa, Jambul rural –T. 1986. dialects of Konimex district. The expression of 7. Kashgari Mahmud. Devonian dictionary is indivisibility with the help of the affix -ma, Turkish. –T., Volume I, 1960. formed by the affix - (i) sh, is found in the 8. Mirzaev M. Bukhara group dialects of Khorezm and Andijan dialects of modern Uzbek language. –T .: Fan, 1969. Uzbek (yozish– yozmash, bilish – bilmash) 9. Muhammadjonov Q. Morphology of (writing - not writing, knowing - not knowing) Uzbek dialects in South Kazakhstan. –T. and in the language of Uyghurs living in 1983. Almaty region. 10. Reshetov V.V. , Shoabdurahmonov Sh. Uzbek dialectology. –T .: Fan, 1978. CONCLUSION 11. Sanaqulov U. , Suvonqulov I. Ethnology The analysis of linguistic evidence collected as (tree) of the Oghuz component of the a result of the research showed that Uzbek Uzbek people and language. – dialects retain many phonetic, lexical and Samarkand, 2013. morphological features of the language. Each 12. Nigora M. The historical development of dialect has to some extent unique the language-the basis of human history morphological features. However, there are //International Journal on Integrated aspects of the same features that belong to a Education. – 2019. – Т. 2. – №. 4. – p. 119- particular dialect that are common to all 121. dialects, which can be explained by factors 13. Jumayevna Y. N. Linguo culture logical such as the historical context of the regions, features of metaphors in children's the influence of sibling and non-sibling literature (On the example of languages. This is fully confirmed by the khudayberdi tokhtabayev's creative materials of Uzbek dialects of Navoi region work) //ACADEMICIA: An International which is the object of research. Multidisciplinary Research Journal. – 2019. – Т. 9. – №. 4. – p. 139-145. REFERENCES 14. Norboyevna Y. R. Structural-semantic, 1. Abdullaev F.F. Khorezm dialects of the national-cultural features of words in Uzbek language. –T., 1969. uzbek language //Asian Journal of 2. Abdullaev F. Oghuz dialect of the Uzbek Multidimensional Research (AJMR). – language. - Tashkent, 1978. 2020. – Т. 9. – №. 5. – p. 409-414. 3. Abdurahmonov G., Rustamov A. Ancient

Turkic language., –T., 1982.

The USA Journals Volume 02 Issue 11 -2020 223