DOCSLIB.ORG

Terrestrial Impact Structures- a Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terrestrial Impact Structures- a Bibliography Terrestrial Impact Structures- A Bibliography By JACQUELYN H. FREEBERG GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1220 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 66-245 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printin~ Office Washin~ton, D.C. 20402 - Price 70 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction-----------------~------------------------------------ 1 Classification of structures _____________________ ------_______________ 2 Seria~----------------------------------------------------------- 4 BibliographY------------------------------------------------------ 12 Distribution and general characteristics of impact structures________ 12 Impact sites ___ -----_____________________________________ ---_- 21 AI Umchaimin Crater-------------------------------------_ 21 Amak Island Crater ____ ---------------------- __ ----------_ 21 Amguid Crater-------------------------------------------- 21 Aouelloul Crater------________________________ -----________ 21 Arnhem Land Crater_______________________________________ 22 Baghdad Craters------------------------------------------ 22 Barringer Crater__________________________________________ 22 Basra Crater------------------------~--------------------- 32 Boxhole Crater-------------------------------------------- 32 Brent Crater---------------------------------------------- 33 Campo del Cielo Craters ___ -------------------------------- 33 Carolina Bays_____________________________________________ 34 Carswell Lake structure____________________________________ 36 Chinge site ______________________________________ --------_ 37 Clearwater Lakes------------------------------------------ 37 Crater Elegante------------------------------------------- 38 Crestone Crater------------------------------------------- 38 Crooked Creek structure___________________________________ 38 Dalgaranga Crater_________________________________________ 38 Decaturville disturbance____________________________________ 39 Deep BaY--------------------------------------------~--- 39 Des Plaines disturbance _______________________________ ----- 40 Duckwater Crater----------------------------------------- 40 Dycus disturbance_________________________________________ 40 Dzioua Craters ___________________________________________ - 41 Ellef Ringnes Island Craters-------------------------------- 41 Eyre Peninsula Craters------------------------------------- 41 Flynn Creek structure______________________________________ 41 Franktown Crater----------------------------------------- 42 Glasford structure ___________________________________ ----_- 42 Glover Bluff structure______________________________________ 42 Gulf of St. Lawrence arc___________________________________ 42 Gwarkuh Crater___________________________________________ 42 IIagens Fjord Craters______________________________________ 43 IIaviland Crater___________________________________________ 43 IIenbury Craters------------------------------------------ 44 IIera ul t Craters _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 45 III IV CONTENTS Page Holleford Crater___________________________________________ 46 Howell structure ___ --------------------------------------- 47 Hungarian Plain___________________________________________ 4 7 Ilumetsa Craters_------- ___ -------__________ -------_______ 47 Jeptha Knob structure _____________ ---------_______________ 47 Ka-imu-hoku ______ ------------------ ____ _____ ____ _____ __ _ 48 Kaalijarv Craters__________________________________________ 48 Kalkkop structure_________________________________________ 50 Keeley Lake---------------------------------------------- 50 Kentland structure________________________________________ 50 Kilmichael structure_______________________________________ 51 Kofels site________________________________________________ 51 Lac Couture---------------------------------------------- 53 Lake Bosumtwi------------------------------------------- 53 Lake Del1en---------------------------------------------- 54 Lake El' gytkhyn _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 54 Lake Humeln_ __ __ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 55 Lake Michikamau___________ _____ __ _____ _____ __ ___ __ ___ __ _ 55 Lake Mien________________________________________________ 55 LakeSiljan_______________________________________________ 55 Lonar Lake----------------------------------------------- 55 Macamic Lake-------------------------------------------- 56 Malha Crater_____________________________________________ 56 Manicouagan-Mushalagan Lakes area________________________ 56 Mansonstructure__________________________________________ 57 Mecatina Crater___________________________________________ 57 Melville Island Craters_____________________________________ 57 Menihek Lake area________________________________________ 57 Merewether Crater________________________________________ 57 Merriwell Lake____________________________________________ 58 Middlesboro Basin________ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 58 Morasko Craters------------------------------------------ 58 Mount Doreen Crater field ______________ ------ ____ --------- 58 Murgab Craters___________________________________________ 59 Nastapoka Islands arc __________ ----------_____ ----- ___ ---- 59 N ebiewale Crater ___________________ -------- __ -------______ 59 New Mexico Crater________________________________________ 59 New Quebec Crater________________________________________ 60 Odessa Craters____________________________________________ 62 Panamint Crater__________________________________________ 64 Paris (Sucy-en-Brie and Alentours) lakes_____________________ 64 Parry Sound Crater________________________________________ 65 Patomskii Crater __________________ ----- ___ ----______ ------ 65 Pilot Lake________________________________________________ 65 Pretoria Salt Pan__________________________________________ 65 Richat Crater_____________________________________________ 65 Rieskessel________________________________________________ 66 Sault au Cochons structure_-------------------------------- 71 Sayan Crater--------------------------------------------- 71 Semsiyat dome _________________________________ -----____ -- 71 Serpent Mound structure ____________ -------_--------------- 71 Sierra Madera structure ______________________ --___ --____ --- 72 CONTENTS v Pag~ Sikhote-Alin Craters__ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 72 Socotra Crater-------------------------------------------- 76 Steinheim Basin___________________________________________ 76 Sudbury Basin____________________________________________ 77 Talemzane Crater_________________________________________ 77 Temimichat-Ghallaman Crater ______ ------- ____ ------_______ 78 Tenoumer Crater__________________________________________ 78 Tiflin Crater---------------------------------------------- 78 Tunguskaevent___________________________________________ 78 TvarenBaY----------------------------------------------- 81 Ungava BaY---------------------------------------------- 81 Upheaval Dome __ -----_------______ -----------____________ 82 Versailles structure________________________________________ 82 Vredefort structure _______________ -'--_______________________ 82 Wabar Craters_--------____________ .,._;:.. _____ ------_________ 84 Wells Creek area _____________ -~-~ f~ __ :_,..:___ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ 84 West Hawk Lake__________________________________________ 85 Wilbarger dome__________ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 85 Wilkes Land structure _________ ---------------------------- 85 Winkler Crater-------------------------------------------- 85 Wolf Creek Crater_________________________________________ 85 Indexes---------------------------------------------------------- 87 Authorindex-------------------------------------------------- 87 Index of alternate names_-------------------------------------- 91 ILLUSTRATION PLATE 1. Sketch map showing locations of terrestrial impact struc- tures---------------------------------------------- In pocket TERRESTRIAL IMPACT STRUCTURES-A BIBLIOGRAPHY By JACQUELYN H. FREEBERG ABSTRACT This bibliography lists 110 features for which origin by meteoritic impact has been suggested and gives a comprehensive group of references for each feature. Annotations for the more significant contributions to the literature are included. The structures are divided into six categories, and their geographic locations are indicated on a sketch map. INTRODUCTION The compilation of a bibliography on terrestrial impact structures was prompted by an increasing interest in meteoritic impact as a factor in the geologic process and by the analogy of these structures to similar features on the moon. The bibliography is comprehensive in order to serve as wide a range of public interest as possible. Some­ thing of an attempt to evaluate the entries has been made by reviewing as many of the articles as possible and by including in the bibliography annotations for some of the more significant contributions to the litera­ ture of each structure. The first section of the bibliography lists the references on distribu­ tion and general characteristics
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fire History and Climate Change
    Synthesis of Knowledge: Fire History and Climate Change William T. Sommers Stanley G. Coloff Susan G. Conard JFSP Project 09‐2‐01‐09 Sommers, William T., Stanley G. Coloff and Susan G. Conard 2011: Fire History and Climate Change. Report Submitted to the Joint Fire Science Program for Project 09‐2‐01‐09. 215 pages + 6 Appendices Abstract This report synthesizes available fire history and climate change scientific knowledge to aid managers with fire decisions in the face of ongoing 21st Century climate change. Fire history and climate change (FHCC) have been ongoing for over 400 million years of Earth history, but increasing human influences during the Holocene epoch have changed both climate and fire regimes. We describe basic concepts of climate science and explain the causes of accelerating 21st Century climate change. Fire regimes and ecosystem classifications serve to unify ecological and climate factors influencing fire, and are useful for applying fire history and climate change information to specific ecosystems. Variable and changing patterns of climate‐fire interaction occur over different time and space scales that shape use of FHCC knowledge. Ecosystem differences in fire regimes, climate change and available fire history mean using an ecosystem specific view will be beneficial when applying FHCC knowledge. Authors William T. Sommers is a Research Professor at George Ma‐ son University in Fairfax, Virginia. He completed a B.S. de‐ gree in Meteorology from the City College of New York, a Acknowledgements S.M. degree in Meteorology from the Massachusetts Insti‐ We thank the Joint Fire Sciences Program for tute of Technology and a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • On Celestial Wings / Edgar D
    Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Whitcomb. Edgar D. On Celestial Wings / Edgar D. Whitcomb. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. 1. United States. Army Air Forces-History-World War, 1939-1945. 2. Flight navigators- United States-Biography. 3. World War, 1939-1945-Campaigns-Pacific Area. 4. World War, 1939-1945-Personal narratives, American. I. Title. D790.W415 1996 940.54’4973-dc20 95-43048 CIP ISBN 1-58566-003-5 First Printing November 1995 Second Printing June 1998 Third Printing December 1999 Fourth Printing May 2000 Fifth Printing August 2001 Disclaimer This publication was produced in the Department of Defense school environment in the interest of academic freedom and the advancement of national defense-related concepts. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States government. This publication has been reviewed by security and policy review authorities and is cleared for public release. Digitize February 2003 from August 2001 Fifth Printing NOTE: Pagination changed. ii This book is dedicated to Charlie Contents Page Disclaimer........................................................................................................................... ii Foreword............................................................................................................................ vi About the author ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Daguerreian Annual 1990-2015: a Complete Index of Subjects
    Daguerreian Annual 1990–2015: A Complete Index of Subjects & Daguerreotypes Illustrated Subject / Year:Page Version 75 Mark S. Johnson Editor of The Daguerreian Annual, 1997–2015 © 2018 Mark S. Johnson Mark Johnson’s contact: [email protected] This index is a work in progress, and I’m certain there are errors. Updated versions will be released so user feedback is encouraged. If you would like to suggest possible additions or corrections, send the text in the body of an email, formatted as “Subject / year:page” To Use A) Using Adobe Reader, this PDF can be quickly scrolled alphabetically by sliding the small box in the window’s vertical scroll bar. - or - B) PDF’s can also be word-searched, as shown in Figure 1. Many index citations contain keywords so trying a word search will often find other instances. Then, clicking these icons Figure 1 Type the word(s) to will take you to another in- be searched in this Adobe Reader Window stance of that word, either box. before or after. If you do not own the Daguerreian Annual this index refers you to, we may be able to help. Contact us at: [email protected] A Acuna, Patricia 2013: 281 1996: 183 Adams, Soloman; microscopic a’Beckett, Mr. Justice (judge) Adam, Hans Christian d’types 1995: 176 1995: 194 2002/2003: 287 [J. A. Whipple] Abbot, Charles G.; Sec. of Smithso- Adams & Co. Express Banking; 2015: 259 [ltr. in Boston Daily nian Institution deposit slip w/ d’type engraving Evening Transcript, 1/7/1847] 2015: 149–151 [letters re Fitz] 2014: 50–51 Adams, Zabdiel Boylston Abbott, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoscience and a Lunar Base
    " t N_iSA Conference Pubhcatmn 3070 " i J Geoscience and a Lunar Base A Comprehensive Plan for Lunar Explora, tion unclas HI/VI 02907_4 at ,unar | !' / | .... ._-.;} / [ | -- --_,,,_-_ |,, |, • • |,_nrrr|l , .l -- - -- - ....... = F _: .......... s_ dd]T_- ! JL --_ - - _ '- "_r: °-__.......... / _r NASA Conference Publication 3070 Geoscience and a Lunar Base A Comprehensive Plan for Lunar Exploration Edited by G. Jeffrey Taylor Institute of Meteoritics University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico Paul D. Spudis U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Astrogeology Flagstaff, Arizona Proceedings of a workshop sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., and held at the Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston, Texas August 25-26, 1988 IW_A National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Division 1990 PREFACE This report was produced at the request of Dr. Michael B. Duke, Director of the Solar System Exploration Division of the NASA Johnson Space Center. At a meeting of the Lunar and Planetary Sample Team (LAPST), Dr. Duke (at the time also Science Director of the Office of Exploration, NASA Headquarters) suggested that future lunar geoscience activities had not been planned systematically and that geoscience goals for the lunar base program were not articulated well. LAPST is a panel that advises NASA on lunar sample allocations and also serves as an advocate for lunar science within the planetary science community. LAPST took it upon itself to organize some formal geoscience planning for a lunar base by creating a document that outlines the types of missions and activities that are needed to understand the Moon and its geologic history.
    [Show full text]
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Impact Structures Provide the Only Ground Truth Against Which Computational and Experimental Results Can Be Com­ Pared
    Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1987. 15:245-70 Copyright([;; /987 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved TERRESTRIAL IMI!ACT STRUCTURES ··- Richard A. F. Grieve Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OY3, Canada INTRODUCTION Impact structures are the dominant landform on planets that have retained portions of their earliest crust. The present surface of the Earth, however, has comparatively few recognized impact structures. This is due to its relative youthfulness and the dynamic nature of the terrestrial geosphere, both of which serve to obscure and remove the impact record. Although not generally viewed as an important terrestrial (as opposed to planetary) geologic process, the role of impact in Earth evolution is now receiving mounting consideration. For example, large-scale impact events may hav~~ been responsible for such phenomena as the formation of the Earth's moon and certain mass extinctions in the biologic record. The importance of the terrestrial impact record is greater than the relatively small number of known structures would indicate. Impact is a highly transient, high-energy event. It is inherently difficult to study through experimentation because of the problem of scale. In addition, sophisticated finite-element code calculations of impact cratering are gen­ erally limited to relatively early-time phenomena as a result of high com­ putational costs. Terrestrial impact structures provide the only ground truth against which computational and experimental results can be com­ pared. These structures provide information on aspects of the third dimen­ sion, the pre- and postimpact distribution of target lithologies, and the nature of the lithologic and mineralogic changes produced by the passage of a shock wave.
    [Show full text]
  • The Being of Analogy Noah Roderick Noah Roderick the Being of Analogy
    Noah Roderick The Being of Analogy Noah Roderick Noah Roderick The Being of Analogy The Being of Modern physics replaced the dualism of matter and form with a new distinction between matter and force. In this way form was marginalized, and with it the related notion of the object. Noah Roderick’s book is a refreshing effort to reverse the consequences of this now banal mainstream materialism. Ranging from physics through literature to linguistics, spanning philosophy from East to West, and weaving it all together in remarkably lucid prose, Roderick intro- duces a new concept of analogy that sheds unfamiliar light on such thinkers as Marx, Deleuze, Goodman, Sellars, and Foucault. More than a literary device, analogy teaches us something about being itself. OPEN HUMANITIES PRESS Cover design by Katherine Gillieson · Illustration by Tammy Lu The Being of Analogy New Metaphysics Series Editors: Graham Harman and Bruno Latour The world is due for a resurgence of original speculative metaphysics. The New Metaphys- ics series aims to provide a safe house for such thinking amidst the demoralizing caution and prudence of professional academic philosophy. We do not aim to bridge the analytic- continental divide, since we are equally impatient with nail-filing analytic critique and the continental reverence for dusty textual monuments. We favor instead the spirit of the intel- lectual gambler, and wish to discover and promote authors who meet this description. Like an emergent recording company, what we seek are traces of a new metaphysical ‘sound’ from any nation of the world. The editors are open to translations of neglected metaphysical classics, and will consider secondary works of especial force and daring.
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Disequilibrium Melting and Melt Migration Driven by Impacts: Implications for Rapid Planetesimal Core Formation
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 100 (2013) 41–59 www.elsevier.com/locate/gca Disequilibrium melting and melt migration driven by impacts: Implications for rapid planetesimal core formation Andrew G. Tomkins ⇑, Roberto F. Weinberg, Bruce F. Schaefer 1, Andrew Langendam School of Geosciences, P.O. Box 28E, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia Received 20 January 2012; accepted in revised form 24 September 2012; available online 12 October 2012 Abstract The e182W ages of magmatic iron meteorites are largely within error of the oldest solar system particles, apparently requir- ing a mechanism for segregation of metals to the cores of planetesimals within 1.5 million years of initial condensation. Cur- rently favoured models involve equilibrium melting and gravitational segregation in a static, quiescent environment, which requires very high early heat production in small bodies via decay of short-lived radionuclides. However, the rapid accretion needed to do this implies a violent early accretionary history, raising the question of whether attainment of equilibrium is a valid assumption. Since our use of the Hf–W isotopic system is predicated on achievement of chemical equilibrium during core formation, our understanding of the timing of this key early solar system process is dependent on our knowledge of the seg- regation mechanism. Here, we investigate impact-related textures and microstructures in chondritic meteorites, and show that impact-generated deformation promoted separation of liquid FeNi into enlarged sulfide-depleted accumulations, and that this happened under conditions of thermochemical disequilibrium. These observations imply that similar enlarged metal accumu- lations developed as the earliest planetesimals grew by rapid collisional accretion.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Target Properties on the Impact Cratering Process
    WORKSHOP PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS LPI Contribution No. 1360 BRIDGING THE GAP II: EFFECT OF TARGET PROPERTIES ON THE IMPACT CRATERING PROCESS September 22–26, 2007 Saint-Hubert, Canada SPONSORS Canadian Space Agency Lunar and Planetary Institute Barringer Crater Company NASA Planetary Geology and Geophysics Program CONVENERS Robert Herrick, University of Alaska Fairbanks Gordon Osinski, Canadian Space Agency Elisabetta Pierazzo, Planetary Science Institute SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Mark Burchell, University of Kent Gareth Collins, Imperial College London Michael Dence, Canadian Academy of Science Kevin Housen, Boeing Corporation Jay Melosh, University of Arizona John Spray, University of New Brunswick Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Contribution No. 1360 Compiled in 2007 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under Agreement No. NCC5-679 issued through the Solar System Exploration Division of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this volume are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. Abstracts in this volume may be cited as Author A. B. (2007) Title of abstract. In Bridging the Gap II: Effect of Target Properties on the Impact Cratering Process, p. XX. LPI Contribution No. 1360, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Cratering
    6 Impact cratering The dominant surface features of the Moon are approximately circular depressions, which may be designated by the general term craters … Solution of the origin of the lunar craters is fundamental to the unravel- ing of the history of the Moon and may shed much light on the history of the terrestrial planets as well. E. M. Shoemaker (1962) Impact craters are the dominant landform on the surface of the Moon, Mercury, and many satellites of the giant planets in the outer Solar System. The southern hemisphere of Mars is heavily affected by impact cratering. From a planetary perspective, the rarity or absence of impact craters on a planet’s surface is the exceptional state, one that needs further explanation, such as on the Earth, Io, or Europa. The process of impact cratering has touched every aspect of planetary evolution, from planetary accretion out of dust or planetesimals, to the course of biological evolution. The importance of impact cratering has been recognized only recently. E. M. Shoemaker (1928–1997), a geologist, was one of the irst to recognize the importance of this process and a major contributor to its elucidation. A few older geologists still resist the notion that important changes in the Earth’s structure and history are the consequences of extraterres- trial impact events. The decades of lunar and planetary exploration since 1970 have, how- ever, brought a new perspective into view, one in which it is clear that high-velocity impacts have, at one time or another, affected nearly every atom that is part of our planetary system.
    [Show full text]