DOCSLIB.ORG

The President of the United States Transmitting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The President of the United States Transmitting 93d Congress, 2d Session House Document No. 93- 403 PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM COMMUNICATION FHOVI THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING PROPOSALS FOR THIRTY-SEVEN ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM AND DEFERRAL OF ACTION ON FIVE AREAS SUITABLE FOR INCLUSION IN THE SYSTEM, AND RECOMMENDATIONS AGAINST THE INCLUSION OF FOUR OTHER AREAS STUDIED, PURSUANT TO SECTION 3 OF THE WILDER- NESS ACT OF 1964 [16 USC 1132] PART 31 UL BEND WILDERNESS MONTANA DECEMBER 4, 197 4. - Referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs and ordered to be printed with illustrations. U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1974 THE WHITE HOUSE • WASHINGTON D e cembe r 4, 1974 Dear Mr. Speaker: Pursuant to the Wilderness Act of September 3, 1964, I am pleased to transmit herewith proposals for thirty-seven additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System. As described in the Wilderness Message that I am con­ currently sending to the Congress today, the proposed new wilderness areas cover a total of over nine million primeval acres. In addition, the Secretary of the Interior has recommended that Congressional action on five other areas which include surface lands suitable for wilderness be deferred for the reasons set forth below: A. Three areas which are open to mining might be needed in the future to provide vital minerals fer the Nation, but these areas have not been adequately surveyed for mineral deposits. The areas are the • Kofa Game Range, Arizona; Charles Sheldon Antelope Range, Nevada and Oregon; and, Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Range, Montana. B. One area is subject to withdrawals for power purposes and additional study is needed of the West's potential energy needs before a wilderness decision can be made. This is Lake Mead National Recreation Area, located in Arizona and Nevada. c. Certain parts of one area are subject to selection by the village of Mekoryuk under the terms of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and a wilderness recommenda­ tion should be made only after the completion of the Native selection process. The area in question is the Nunivak National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Four other possibilities considered by the Secretary of the Interior in his review of roadless areas of 5,000 acres or more were found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the Wilderness System: Deer Flat National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon and Idaho; Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, Maryland; Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky; and, Upper Mississippi River Wildlife and Fish Refuge, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa and Illinois. I concur in this finding and in the other recommendations of the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture, all of which are transmitted herewith. Wilderness designation of both of these new wilderness areas and those already submitted that are pending be­ fore the Congress would dramatically demonstrate our commitment to preserve America's irreplaceable heritage, and I urge the Congress to act promptly in this regard. Sincerely, The Honorable Carl Albert Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 • • United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 AUG 2 8 1974 Dear Mr. President: It is with pleasure that I recommend the establishment of areas totaling approximately 19,693 acres in UL Bend National Wildlife Refuge as part of the I~ational Wilderness Preservation System. The recommendation stems from this Department's responsibility under the Wilderness Act ( 78 Stat. 890) to recommend to the President areas within its jurisdiction suitable for designation as wilderness. Having reviewed potential areas in UL Bend National Wildlife Ref'uge, we conclude that 19,693 of the ref'uge's 46,264 acres should be designated wilderness. Named after a hairpin turn in the Missouri River, UL BenC. is located along that river's Fort Peck Reservoir in north-central Montana. The refuge was established by the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission on February 7, 1967, and includes 2,800 acres of unacquired State lands and 9,225 acres of land acquired by the Corps of Engineers and managed by the refuge under a cooperative agreement. Flat to rolling grasslands, broken by draws and ridges, make up the terrain of the ref'uge, whose primary objective is to provide habitat for migratory waterfowl. The cli.llla.te of the ar~a is quite cold, with an average of only 124 frost-free days per year. Such typical northern prairie waterfowl as Canada geese, widgeon, mallards, pintails, gadwall, and blue-winged teal occur on the refuge. Among other birds found there is the unique burrowing owl, which nests in abandoned "dwellings" in prairie dog towns. The area recanmended for wilderness designation constitutes about 40 percent of the refuge; the remainder of the ref'uge is required to meet manageme~t objectives. In accordance with the requirements of the Wilderness Act, a public hearing on the recommendation was held at Malta, Montana, on May 20, 1974. Analyses of the hearing records and written expressions received, t ogether with the letters received from other Federal agencies, are contained in the enclosed synopsis. Complete records have been compiled and are avail­ able for inspection by the public. Enclosed is a draft bill which, if enacted, would incorporate the recommended area of UL Bend National Wildlife Refuge into the National Wilderness Preservation System. Sincerely yours, ~'la;:•-,_, <jd ;:/ Assistant Secretary of the Interior The President The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Enclosure • • • A BILL • To design.ate certain lands in the UL Bend National Wildlife Refuge, Phillips County, M~ntana, as wilderness. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with section 3(c) of the Wilderness Act of September 3, 1964 (78 Stat. 890, 892; U.S.C. 1132(c)), certain lands in the UL Bend National Wildlife Re:fuge, Montana, which comprise about 19,693 acres, and which are depicted on the map entitled ''uL Bend Wilderness Proposal" and dated June 1974, are hereby designated as wilderness. The map and a description of the boundaries of such lands shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior. SEC. 2. As soon as practicable after this Act takes effect, a map of the wilderness and a description of its boundaries shall be filed with the Interior and Insular Affairs Committees of the United States Senate and House of Representatives, and such map and description shall have the same rorce and effect as if included in this Act: Provided, however, That correction of clerical and typographical errors in such description and map ma.y be made. SEC. 3. The wilderness area designated by this Act shall be kno'Wil as the "UL Bend Wilderness" and shall be administered by the Secretary or the Interior in accordance with the provisions of the Wilderness Act governing areas designated by that Act as wilderness areas, and where appropriate any reference in that Act to the Secretary of Agriculture shall be deemed to be a reference to the Secretary of the Interior. SEC. 4. Subject to all valid rights existing on the date of enactment of this Act, lands designated as wilderness by the Act are hereby withdra"Wl1 f'rom all forms of appropriations. under the mining laws and f'rom disposition under all laws pertaining to mineral leasing and all amendments thereto. SEC. 5. Nothing in this Act shall affect the operation and maintenance of the Fort Peck Reservoir as administered by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, at authorized water levels. The Fort Peck Reservoir shoreline boundaries of the area designated as wilderness by this Act shall not extend below the 2,270 foot contour and shall not affect the purposes of the Fort Peck project. SEC. 6. No~hing in this Act shall be construed to diminish the authority of the Coast Guard, pursuant to 14 U.S.C. 2 and 81 and title 1 of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1221), to use the area designated wilderness by this Act for navigational, and maritime safety purposes. PUBLIC HEARING ANALYSIS UL BEND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE On May 20, 1974 pursuant to the requirements of the Wilderness Act, a public hearing was held at Malta, Montana to ascertain public views on the desirability to include the UL Bend National Wildlife Refuge in the National Wilderness Preservation System. The hearing record remained open until June 20, 1974 in order to al low sufficient time for interested agencies and individuals to submit written statements for inclusion in the official record. The public hearing was officially opened at 9 a.m. on May ,20, 1974 at Malta City Hall, Malta, Montana. The hearing officer was Lotario D. Ortega, Field Solicitor, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Prepared statements were read by Mr. Ortega and Mr. Burton Rounds, Area Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Billings, Montana. The proposal made by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at the hearing was as follows: "Approximately 20,893 acres, consisting of two separate units - Beauchamp Unit at approximately 2,984 acres and the Lower Unit at approximately 17,909 acres - are recommended for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. The remaining 25,371 acres were found unsuitable and should not be considered." A total of 43 individuals cttended the hearing proceedings. No elected fficials were present. Nine statements were presented. Speakers were lled upon to make statements in the order in which they registered. Organizational representatives that presented statements in favor of the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Security Threatens Northern Border Wildernesses
    Wilderness In Peril: Border Security Measures Threaten Wilderness along the Northern Border with Canada An Analysis Prepared by Wilderness Watch October 2012 Wilderness Watch P.O. Box 9175 Missoula, MT 59807 406-542-2048 www.wildernesswatch.org For more information, contact: George Nickas, Executive Director Kevin Proescholdt, Conservation Director [email protected] [email protected] 406-542-2048 612-201-9266 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………...…………….Page 3 Introduction………………………………………………………..………..….....Page 4 Background…………………………………………………..………………....…Page 4 A. Early 20th Century Border Easements B. International Boundary Treaties with Canada C. 2005 REAL ID Act D. 2006 Interagency Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Border Patrol Practices on the Southern Border and Lessons for the North……………………………………………………………….Page 9 A. Border Wall Construction B. Illegal Roads and Vehicle Routes C. Border Security Infrastructure D. Motorized Patrols Emerging Major Threats to Wildernesses near the Northern Border……...…Page 13 A. Congressional Legislation B. Northern Border Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement C. 2006 MOU and Motorized Patrols D. Administrative Waiver of Federal Laws E. Clearing and Construction in Border Reservations F. Conclusion Needed Actions to Reestablish and Affirm Wilderness Protections Along the Northern Border……………………………………….……………..Page 17 A. Existing Homeland Security Laws B. 2006 MOU C. Northern Border PEIS D. Pending Legislation E. Restore Wilderness Protection Appendix - Wildernesses at Risk along the Northern Border………………....Page 18 3 Executive Summary Under the guise of border security, a plethora of new and proposed laws, policies, memoranda, and other governmental actions pose an unprecedented threat to Wildernesses, including in many national parks, along our nation’s Northern Border. This whitepaper describes the threats and presents several recommendations for securing the protection of Wilderness and parks along the Northern Border.
    [Show full text]
  • Roger Dunsmore Came to the University of Montana in 1963 As a Freshman Composition Instructor in the English Department
    January 30 Introduction to the Series Roger Dunsmore Bio: Roger Dunsmore came to the University of Montana in 1963 as a freshman composition instructor in the English Department. In 1964 he also began to teach half- time in the Humanities Program. He taught his first course in American Indian Literature, Indian Autobiographies, in 1969. In 1971 he was an originating member of the faculty group that formed the Round River Experiment in Environmental Education (1971- 74) and has taught in UM’s Wilderness and Civilization Program since 1976. He received his MFA in Creative Writing (poetry) in 1971 and his first volume of poetry.On The Road To Sleeping ChildHotsprings was published that same year. (Revised edition, 1977.) Lazslo Toth, a documentary poem on the smashing of Michelangelo’s Pieta was published in 1979. His second full length volume of poems,Bloodhouse, 1987, was selected by the Yellowstone Art Center, Billings, MX for their Regional Writer’s Project.. The title poem of his chapbook.The Sharp-Shinned Hawk, 1987, was nominated by the Koyukon writer, Mary TallMountain for a Pushcat Prize. He retired from full-time teaching after twenty-five years, in 1988, but continues at UM under a one- third time retiree option. During the 1988-89 academic year he was Humanities Scholar in Residence for the Arizona Humanities Council, training teachers at a large Indian high school on the Navajo Reservation. A chapbook of his reading at the International Wildlife Film Festival, The Bear Remembers, was published in 1990. Spring semester, 1991, (and again in the fall semester, 1997) he taught modern American Literature as UM’s Exchange Fellow with Shanghai International Studies University in mainland China.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Appendices...................................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................vii List of Figures............................................................................................................................................vii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Background..................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1.1 Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) .......................................................1-1 1.1.2 Purpose of Using a Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) to Analyze This Proposed Action..........................................................................................................1-2 1.2 Purpose and Need........................................................................................................................1-3 1.2.1 Purpose of the Proposed Action...........................................................................................1-3 1.2.2 Need for the Proposed Action..............................................................................................1-4
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 156/Tuesday, August 15, 2017
    38654 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 15, 2017 / Proposed Rules substantial number of small entities ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 AGENCY commenting-epa-dockets. U.S.C. 601 et seq.); FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 40 CFR Part 52 • Does not contain any unfunded Michele Notarianni, Air Regulatory mandate or significantly or uniquely [EPA–R04–OAR–2016–0634; FRL–9966–32– Management Section, Air Planning and affect small governments, as described Region 4] Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Regional Environmental Protection Agency, of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Haze Progress Report Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., • Does not have Federalism Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. AGENCY: implications as specified in Executive Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Notarianni can be reached by phone at Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, (404) 562–9031 and via electronic mail ACTION: 1999); Proposed rule. at [email protected]. • Is not an economically significant SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: regulatory action based on health or Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a I. Background safety risks subject to Executive Order State Implementation Plan (SIP) States are required to submit a 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); revision submitted by the State of progress report in the form of a SIP • Georgia, Department of Natural Is not a significant regulatory action Resources, through the Georgia revision during the first implementation subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR Environmental Protection Division (GA period that evaluates progress towards 28355, May 22, 2001); EPD) on January 8, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Regional Haze Project Update
    Environmental Show of the South Chattanooga, Tennessee May 15, 2019 Southeastern Regional Haze Project Update John Hornback Executive Director Metro 4/SESARM 1 Presentation Outline • Introduction to Metro 4/SESARM • Regional haze program expectations • Key VISTAS project tasks • VISTAS technical analysis status • What we’ve learned • Consultation and communications • Remaining work and projected schedule 2 Metro 4/SESARM WHO WE ARE • Nonprofit corporations • Multi-jurisdictional organizations (MJOs) • Organized in mid-1990s by locals/states • Metro 4 membership – 17 local agencies ➢in AL, FL, KY, NC, and TN • SESARM membership – 10 states ➢AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV • Funded by member agencies, mostly via grants 3 Metro 4/SESARM WHAT WE DO Mission: To enhance the effectiveness of member agencies in managing and improving air quality.” • Advocate positions of agencies on issues • Promote communications • Offer training courses • Manage regional meetings and workshops • Support technical analysis projects • “Other duties as assigned” 4 1999 Regional Haze Rule Objectives • Reduction of visibility impairment on the 20% haziest (worst) days in national park and wilderness (Class I) areas to natural conditions by 2064 • No worsening of visibility on the 20% cleanest (best) days. • Development of State Implementation Plans (SIPs) every 10 years to address emissions that contribute to regional haze. 5 Regional Haze Rule Requirements 40 CFR 51.308 • Establish baseline visibility conditions (2000 – 2004) • Evaluate most impaired and
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill to Establish the Lee Metcalf Wilderness and Management Area in the State of Montana, and for Other Purposes
    98 S.96 Title: A bill to establish the Lee Metcalf Wilderness and Management Area in the State of Montana, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Sen Melcher, John [MT] (introduced 1/26/1983) Cosponsors (None) Latest Major Action: 10/31/1983 Became Public Law No: 98-140. SUMMARY AS OF: 10/6/1983--Passed House amended. (There are 4 other summaries) (Measure passed House, amended) Lee Metcalf Wilderness and Management Act of 1983 - Designates specified lands within the Beaverhead and Gallatin National Forests in Montana and within the Dillon Resource Area in Montana as the Lee Metcalf Wilderness. Provides that the area lying adjacent to the Monument Mountain and Taylor- Hilgard units of the Lee Metcalf Wilderness shall be managed to protect the wildlife and recreational values of such area. Withdraws such area from all forms of appropriations under mining, mineral leasing, and geothermal leasing laws. Provides that such area shall be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture to maintain its presently existing wilderness character, with no commercial timber harvest or additional road construction permitted. Requires that motor vehicles be allowed in the area only where they are compatible with the protection and propagation of wildlife in the area. Provides that the following areas have been adequately studied for wilderness and need not be managed to protect their suitability for wilderness designation pending revision of the initial plans required for such lands by the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974: (1) the Mount Henry Wilderness Study Area in the Kootenai National Forest; (2) portions of the Taylor-Hilgard Wilderness Study Area in the Beaverhead and Gallatin National Forests; (3) certain lands in the Gallatin and Beaverhead National Forests identified as area 1549 in the Forest Service Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (II) Final Environmental Statement (dated May 3, 1979); and (4) the proposed Tongue River Breaks Wilderness in the Custer National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1480 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1113 (Pub
    § 1113 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1480 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 13, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation § 1113. Authorization of appropriations System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- There are hereby authorized to be appro- priations be available for additional personnel priated to the Department of the Interior with- stated as being required solely for the purpose of out fiscal year limitation such sums as may be managing or administering areas solely because necessary for the purposes of this chapter and they are included within the National Wilder- the agreement with the Government of Canada ness Preservation System. signed January 22, 1964, article 11 of which pro- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined vides that the Governments of the United States A wilderness, in contrast with those areas and Canada shall share equally the costs of de- where man and his own works dominate the veloping and the annual cost of operating and landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where maintaining the Roosevelt Campobello Inter- the earth and its community of life are un- national Park. trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- (Pub. L. 88–363, § 14, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this chapter an CHAPTER 23—NATIONAL WILDERNESS area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its PRESERVATION SYSTEM primeval character and influence, without per- manent improvements or human habitation, Sec. which is protected and managed so as to pre- 1131.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement Uwharrie National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan National Forests in North Carolina
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region Final Environmental Impact Statement Uwharrie National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan National Forests in North Carolina R8-MB-140B May 2012 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Final Environmental Impact Statement Uwharrie National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan National Forests in North Carolina May 2012 Responsible Agency: USDA Forest Service Elizabeth Agpaoa Responsible Official: Regional Forester 1720 Peachtree Road NW Atlanta, GA 30309 404-347-4177 For more information contact: Forest Supervisor National Forests in North Carolina 160 Zillicoa Street Suite A Asheville, NC 28801 (828) 257- 4200 Abstract: Three alternatives for revision of the Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP or Forest Plan) for the Uwharrie National Forest are described, compared, and analyzed in detail in this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilderness Act of 1964
    The Wilderness Act of 1964 Source: US House of Representatives Office of the Law This is the 1964 act that started it all Revision Counsel website at and created the first designated http://uscode.house.gov/download/ascii.shtml wilderness in the US and Nevada. This version, updated January 2, 2006, includes a list of all wilderness designated before that date. The list does not mention designations made by the December 2006 White Pine County bill. -CITE- 16 USC CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM 01/02/2006 -EXPCITE- TITLE 16 - CONSERVATION CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -HEAD- CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -MISC1- Sec. 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of policy; wilderness areas; administration for public use and enjoyment, protection, preservation, and gathering and dissemination of information; provisions for designation as wilderness areas. (b) Management of area included in System; appropriations. (c) "Wilderness" defined. 1132. Extent of System. (a) Designation of wilderness areas; filing of maps and descriptions with Congressional committees; correction of errors; public records; availability of records in regional offices. (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classifications as primitive areas; Presidential recommendations to Congress; approval of Congress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Eagles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado. (c) Review by Secretary of the Interior of roadless areas of national park system and national wildlife refuges and game ranges and suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; authority of Secretary of the Interior to maintain roadless areas in national park system unaffected. (d) Conditions precedent to administrative recommendations of suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; publication in Federal Register; public hearings; views of State, county, and Federal officials; submission of views to Congress.
    [Show full text]