DOCSLIB.ORG

FY12 Priority County and Area List (June 7, 2012)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FY12 Priority County and Area List Office of Transportation and Air Quality Revised June 7, 2012 Please refer to the DERA Request for Proposals, Appendix D, for additional information The DERA program places a priority on projects that are located in areas that have the highest emissions from diesel engines. The term “project location,” as used in the FY 2012 National Clean Diesel Funding Assistance Program RFP, refers to the primary area where the affected vehicles/engines operate, or the primary area where the emissions benefits of the project will be realized. Please note that applicants may apply for projects that are not located in priority areas. These counties and areas were selected as priority areas for the DERA program based on data from a number of sources. The sources include counties and areas: Designated as PM2.5 or 8-Hr Ozone Nonattainment Areas or 8-Hr Ozone Maintenance Areas. Data is sourced from EPA’s Green Book of Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants. (www.epa.gov/oaqps001/greenbk) Where all or part of the population is exposed to more than 2.0 ìg/m3 of diesel particulate matter emissions. Data is sourced from the 2005 National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment. (www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/nata2005) That are designated as Federal Class I Areas. (www.epa.gov/visibility/class1.html) That have been accepted to participate in EPA’s Ozone Advance Program by the close of this RFP, June 4, 2012. (www.epa.gov/ozoneadvance) Page 1 of 9 FY12 Priority County and Area List Office of Transportation and Air Quality Revised June 7, 2012 Please refer to the DERA Request for Proposals, Appendix D, for additional information STATE COUNTY or AREA STATE COUNTY or AREA STATE COUNTY or AREA AK Anchorage ME Waldo OH Licking AK Bering Sea Wilderness Area ME York OH Lorain AK Denali National Park (formerly Mt. McKinley National Park) MI Allegan OH Lucas AK Fairbanks North Star MI Benzie OH Madison AK Simeonof Wilderness Area MI Berrien OH Mahoning AK Tuxedni Wilderness Area MI Calhoun OH Medina AL Jefferson MI Cass OH Miami AL Mobile MI Clinton OH Montgomery AL Shelby MI Eaton OH Portage AL Sipsey Wilderness Area MI Genesee OH Preble AL Walker MI Huron OH Stark AR Caney Creek Wilderness Area MI Ingham OH Summit AR Crittenden MI Isle Royale National Park OH Trumbull AR Pulaski MI Kalamazoo OH Warren AR Upper Buffalo Wilderness Area MI Kent OH Washington AZ Chiricahua National Monument Wilderness Area MI Lapeer OH Wood AZ Chiricahua Wilderness Area MI Lenawee OK Canadien AZ Galiuro Wilderness Area MI Livingston OK Cleveland AZ Grand Canyon National Park MI Macomb OK Grady AZ Maricopa MI Mason OK Lincoln AZ Mazatzal Wilderness Area MI Monroe OK Logan AZ Mount Baldy Wilderness Area MI Muskegon OK McClain AZ Petrified Forest National Park MI Oakland OK Oklahoma AZ Pima MI Ottawa OK Wichita Mountains Wilderness AZ Pinal MI Seney Wilderness Area OR Clackamas AZ Pine Mountain Wilderness Area MI St. Clair OR Crater Lake National Park AZ Saguaro Wilderness Area MI Van Buren OR Diamond Peak Wilderness AZ Santa Cruz MI Washtenaw OR Eagle Cap Wilderness AZ Sierra Ancha Wilderness Area MI Wayne OR Gearhart Mountain Wilderness AZ Superstition Wilderness Area MN Aitkin OR Hells Canyon Wilderness AZ Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Area MN Anoka OR Kalmiopsis Wilderness CA Agua Tibia Wilderness Area MN Becker OR Klamath CA Alameda MN Beltrami OR Lane CA Amador MN Benton OR Mount Hood Wilderness CA Butte MN Big Stone OR Mount Jefferson Wilderness CA Calaveras MN Blue Earth OR Mount Washington Wilderness CA Caribou Wilderness Area MN Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Area OR Mountain Lakes Wilderness CA Contra Costa MN Brown OR Multnomah CA Cucamonga Wilderness Area MN Carlton OR Strawberry Mountain Wilderness CA Desolation Wilderness Area MN Carber OR Three Sisters Wilderness CA Dome Land Wilderness Area MN Cass OR Washington Page 2 of 9 FY12 Priority County and Area List Office of Transportation and Air Quality Revised June 7, 2012 Please refer to the DERA Request for Proposals, Appendix D, for additional information STATE COUNTY or AREA STATE COUNTY or AREA STATE COUNTY or AREA CA El Dorado MN Chippewa PA Adams CA Emigrant Wilderness Area MN Chisago PA Allegheny CA Fresno MN Clay PA Armstrong CA Hoover Wilderness Area MN Clearwater PA Beaver CA Imperial MN Cook PA Berks CA John Muir Wilderness Area MN Cottonwood PA Blair CA Joshua Tree Wilderness Area MN Crow Wing PA Bucks CA Kaiser Wilderness Area MN Dakota PA Butler CA Kern MN Dodge PA Cambria CA Kings MN Douglas PA Carbon CA Kings Canyon National Park MN Faribault PA Centre CA Lassen Volcanic National Park MN Fillmore PA Chester CA Lava Beds Wilderness Area MN Freeborn PA Clearfield CA Los Angeles MN Goodhue PA Cumberland CA Madera MN Grant PA Dauphin CA Marble Mountain Wilderness Area MN Hennepin PA Delaware CA Marin MN Houston PA Erie CA Mariposa MN Hubbard PA Fayette CA Merced MN Isanti PA Franklin CA Minarets Wilderness Area MN Itasca PA Greene CA Mokelumme Wilderness Area MN Jackson PA Indiana CA Napa MN Kanabec PA Lackawanna CA Nevada MN Kandiyohi PA Lancaster CA Orange MN Kittson PA Lawrence CA Pinnacles Wilderness Area MN Koochiching PA Lebanon CA Placer MN Lac qui Parle PA Lehigh CA Point Reyes Wilderness Area MN Lake PA Luzerne CA Redwood National Park MN Lake of the Woods PA Mercer CA Riverside MN Le Sueur PA Monroe CA Sacramento MN Lincoln PA Montgomery CA San Bernardino MN Lyon PA Northampton CA San Diego MN McLeod PA Perry CA San Francisco MN Mahnomen PA Philadelphia CA San Gabriel Wilderness Area MN Marshall PA Tioga CA San Gorgonio Wilderness Area MN Martin PA Washington CA San Jacinto Wilderness Area MN Meeker PA Westmoreland CA San Joaquin MN Mille Lacs PA Wyoming CA San Mateo MN Morrison PA York CA San Rafael Wilderness Area MN Mower PR Bayamon CA Santa Barbara MN Murray PR Carolina CA Santa Clara MN Nicollet PR Guaynabo Page 3 of 9 FY12 Priority County and Area List Office of Transportation and Air Quality Revised June 7, 2012 Please refer to the DERA Request for Proposals, Appendix D, for additional information STATE COUNTY or AREA STATE COUNTY or AREA STATE COUNTY or AREA CA Sequoia National Park MN Nobles PR Mayaguez CA Shasta MN Norman PR San Juan CA Solano MN Olmsted RI Bristol CA Sonoma MN Otter Tail RI Kent CA South Warner Wilderness Area MN Pennington RI Newport CA Stanislaus MN Pine RI Providence CA Sutter MN Pipestone RI Washington CA Thousand Lakes Wilderness Area. MN Polk SC Abbeville CA Tulare MN Pope SC Aiken CA Tuolumne MN Ramsey SC Allendale CA Ventana Wilderness Area MN Red Lake SC Anderson CA Ventura MN Redwood SC Bamberg CA Yolla-Bolly-Middle-Eel Wilderness Area MN Renville SC Barnwell CA Yolo MN Rice SC Beaufort CA Yosemite National Park MN Rock SC Berkeley CA Yuba MN Roseau SC Calhoun CO Adams MN Scott SC Cape Romain Wilderness CO Arapahoe MN Sherburne SC Charleston CO Black Canyon of the Gunnison Wilderness Area MN Sibley SC Cherokee CO Boulder MN St. Louis SC Chester CO Denver MN Stearns SC Chesterfield CO Douglas MN Steele SC Clarendon CO Eagles Nest Wilderness Area MN Stevens SC Colleton CO Flat Tops Wilderness Area MN Swift SC Darlington CO Great Sand Dunes Wilderness Area MN Todd SC Dillon CO Jefferson MN Traverse SC Dorchester CO La Garita Wilderness Area MN Voyageurs National Park SC Edgefield CO Larimer MN Wabasha SC Fairfield CO Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness Area MN Wadena SC Florence CO Mesa Verde National Park MN Waseca SC Georgetown CO Mount Zirkel Wilderness Area MN Washington SC Greenville CO Rawah Wilderness Area MN Watonwan SC Greenwood CO Rocky Mountain National Park MN Wilkin SC Hampton CO Weld MN Winona SC Horry CO Weminuche Wilderness Area. MN Wright SC Jasper CO West Elk Wilderness Area MN Yellow Medicine SC Kershaw CT Fairfield MO Barry SC Lancaster CT Hartford MO Barton SC Laurens CT Litchfield MO Bollinger SC Lee CT Middlesex MO Cape Girardeau SC Lexington CT New Haven MO Cass SC McCormick Page 4 of 9 FY12 Priority County and Area List Office of Transportation and Air Quality Revised June 7, 2012 Please refer to the DERA Request for Proposals, Appendix D, for additional information STATE COUNTY or AREA STATE COUNTY or AREA STATE COUNTY or AREA CT New London MO Cedar SC Marion CT Tolland MO Christian SC Marlboro CT Windham MO Clay SC Newberry DC District of Columbia MO Dade SC Oconee DE Kent MO Dallas SC Orangeburg DE New Castle MO Franklin SC Pickens DE Sussex MO Greene SC Richland FL Brevard MO Hercules-Glades Wilderness Area SC Saluda FL Broward MO Iron SC Spartanburg FL Chassahowitzka Wilderness Area MO Jackson SC Sumter FL Duval MO Jasper SC Union FL Everglades National Park MO Jefferon SC Williamsburg FL Hillsborough MO Lawrence SC York FL Lee MO Madison SD Badlands Wilderness FL Miami-Dade MO McDonald SD Wind Cave National Park FL Orange MO Mingo Wilderness Area TN Anderson FL Palm Beach MO Newton TN Blount FL Sarasota MO Perry TN Cocke FL St. Marks Wilderness Area MO Polk TN Davidson GA Barrow MO Platte TN Great Smoky Mountains National Park GA Bartow MO Ray TN Hamilton GA Bibb MO Ste. Genevieve TN Jefferson GA Carroll MO St. Charles TN Knox GA Chatham MO St. Francois TN Loudon GA Cherokee MO St. Louis TN Montgomery GA Clayton MO St. Louis City TN Roane GA Cobb MO Stone TN Sevier GA Cohotta Wilderness Area MO Taney TN Shelby GA Coweta MO Webster TX Bastrop GA DeKalb MS DeSoto TX Bexar GA Douglas MS Harrison TX Big Bend National Park GA Fayette MS Hinds TX Bowie GA Forsyth MS Jackson TX Brazoria GA Fulton MS Warren TX Brazos GA Gwinnett MS Washington TX Caldwell GA Hall MT Anaconda-Pintlar Wilderness Area TX Chambers GA
Recommended publications
  • Rio Grande National Forest EIS CE

    Rio Grande National Forest EIS CE

    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2018 to 06/30/2018 Rio Grande National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Rio Grande National Forest, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R2 - Rocky Mountain Region Rio Grande Forest Plan - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:06/2018 09/2018 Erin Minks Revision DEIS NOA in Federal Register 719-852-6215 EIS 10/02/2017 [email protected] Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2018 Description: Forest Plan Revision Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=46078 Location: UNIT - Rio Grande National Forest All Units. STATE - Colorado. COUNTY - Alamosa, Archuleta, Conejos, Costilla, Custer, Hinsdale, Mineral, Rio Grande, Saguache, San Juan. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Rio Grande National Forest in south central CO. Rio Grande National Forest, Occurring in more than one District (excluding Forestwide) R2 - Rocky Mountain Region DITCH BILL EASEMENTS - Special use management In Progress: Expected:12/2013 01/2014 Matthew Custer CE Scoping Start 09/20/1995 719-852-6206 [email protected] Description: The Forest has 87 applications for Ditch Bill Easements. The Forest intends to process at least 25 of these applications in FY05. This action involves authorizing historical facilities that qualify under the Ditch Bill. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/riogrande/projects/ Location: UNIT - Conejos Peak Ranger District, Divide Ranger District, Saguache Ranger District. STATE - Colorado. COUNTY - Alamosa, Conejos, Hinsdale, Mineral, Rio Grande, Saguache.
  • FS Region 2 Snowmobile Trespass Strategy

    FS Region 2 Snowmobile Trespass Strategy

    Rocky Mountain Region Information and Education Strategy For The Prevention of Snowmobile Trespass In Wilderness Third Edition January 2004 - -1 Table of Contents Page I. Problem Statement 1 II. Current Situation 1 III. Current Direction 3 IV. Implementation and Responsibilities 3 V. Monitoring and Reporting 4 VI. Using the Appendices and Tool Kit 4 VII. Appendices A. Excerpts from the Wilderness Act of 1964 6 B. Selected References from the Code of Federal Regulations 7 C. Selected References from Forest Service Manual 2320 8 D. Patrol Ideas 11 E. Potential Cooperators/Contacts for Reaching Local Users 13 F. Potential Cooperators/Contacts for Reaching Non-local Users 15 G. In-house I&E Ideas 17 H. Suggested Actions for Dealing With Intentional Trespass 18 I. Tool and Techniques - Law Enforcement and the “Authority Of The Resource" 19 J. What Harm Is There in Operating My Snowmobile in Wilderness? 25 K. Why is Wilderness Closed to Motorized and Mechanical Travel? 26 L. State Registration Agencies, State Snowmobile Associations and Snowmobile Clubs 27 M. Annual Monitoring Report 35 VIII. Tool Kit 38 1 - -1 I. Problem Statement The Wilderness Act of 1964 first created Congressionally designated wilderness. The Act stated that "In order to assure that an increasing population, accompanied by expanding settlement and growing mechanization, does not occupy and modify all areas within the United States ... it is hereby declared to be the policy of Congress to secure for the American people of present and future generations the benefits of an enduring resource of wilderness". The Act defined wilderness as having outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation.
  • Mitteilungen 29

    Mitteilungen 29

    MITTEILUNGEN 29. Jahrgang / Heft 1-2019 / kostenlos „Leipziger Kletterschule“ 100 Jahre Ostbruch Brandis 7-Brüche-Wandertag Flyer zum Jubiläum (Beilage im Heft) Wild, Wilder, Wilderness Trekking in den Bergen Colorados Iran Skitour zum Damawand 1 DAV MITTEILUNGEN | AUS DER GESCHÄFTSSTELLE 2 Vorwort Winter ohne Leipzig Den Ein oder Anderen könnte es freuen, dass dieser Winter weite Teile Deutschlands und Ös- doch einige der spannendsten Geschichten bereit, terreich voll im Griff hatte und zum Schnee- die ihr in diesem Heft nacherleben könnt. Eine schuhwandern und Skitouren gehen eingeladen Skitour im Iran, eine Wintertour von Thomas aber hat. Wer jedoch nicht geplant hatte einmal in die auch eine Trekking-Reise in den eher wärmeren Alpen zu fahren, der blieb vom Schnee verschont. Gefilden von Colorado (Teil1) werden euch diese In Leipzig hatte man wie immer das Gefühl un- Ausgabe versüßen. Ebenso fiebere ich bereits den ter einer Glocke zu leben die den Schnee abfängt. ersten warmem Sonnenstrahlen und Tagen am Seit einigen Jahren erlebe ich den Winter hier Fels entgegen. Über Ostern geht es sicher wieder eher als verspäteten Herbst mit reichlich Regen, für ein paar Tage nach Tirol, um einige Projekte Tee und intensivem Hallentraining. Für jemanden vom letzten Jahr in der Ehnbachklamm anzuge- wie mich, der seine Kindheit im Südharz verbracht hen. Einer der schönsten Kletterspots die ich bis- hat, ist das schon etwas gewöhnungsbedürftig. her besuchen durfte. Um wenigstens einen Hauch von Wintergefühl Anlässlich des 150 Jubiläums des Deutschen Al- zu bekommen, muss ich hier schon in den Zug penvereines und auch der Sektion Leipzig, freue steigen. Da freue ich mich umso mehr von den ich mich in diesem Jahr zudem besonders auf die Menschen zu lesen, die sich trotz der hiesigen Jubiläumsfeier am 31.
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009

    VGP) Version 2/5/2009

    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators

    Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators

    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
  • Arizona Regional Haze 308

    Arizona Regional Haze 308

    Arizona State Implementation Plan Regional Haze Under Section 308 Of the Federal Regional Haze Rule Air Quality Division January 2011 (page intentionally blank) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Overview of Visibility and Regional Haze..................................................................................2 1.2 Arizona Class I Areas.................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Background of the Regional Haze Rule ......................................................................................3 1.3.1 The 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments................................................................................ 3 1.3.2 Phase I Visibility Rules – The Arizona Visibility Protection Plan ..................................... 4 1.3.3 The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments................................................................................ 4 1.3.4 Submittal of Arizona 309 SIP............................................................................................. 6 1.4 Purpose of This Document .......................................................................................................... 9 1.4.1 Basic Plan Elements.......................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 2: ARIZONA REGIONAL HAZE SIP DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ......................... 15 2.1 Federal
  • Geologic Influences on Apache Trout Habitat in the White Mountains of Arizona

    Geologic Influences on Apache Trout Habitat in the White Mountains of Arizona

    GEOLOGIC INFLUENCES ON APACHE TROUT HABITAT IN THE WHITE MOUNTAINS OF ARIZONA JONATHAN W. LONG, ALVIN L. MEDINA, Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, 2500 S. Pine Knoll Dr, Flagstaff, AZ 86001; and AREGAI TECLE, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 15108, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 ABSTRACT Geologic variation has important influences on habitat quality for species of concern, but it can be difficult to evaluate due to subtle variations, complex terminology, and inadequate maps. To better understand habitat of the Apache trout (Onchorhynchus apache or O. gilae apache Miller), a threatened endemic species of the White Mountains of east- central Arizona, we reviewed existing geologic research to prepare composite geologic maps of the region at intermediate and fine scales. We projected these maps onto digital elevation models to visualize combinations of lithology and topog- raphy, or lithotopo types, in three-dimensions. Then we examined habitat studies of the Apache trout to evaluate how intermediate-scale geologic variation could influence habitat quality for the species. Analysis of data from six stream gages in the White Mountains indicates that base flows are sustained better in streams draining Mount Baldy. Felsic parent material and extensive epiclastic deposits account for greater abundance of gravels and boulders in Mount Baldy streams relative to those on adjacent mafic plateaus. Other important factors that are likely to differ between these lithotopo types include temperature, large woody debris, and water chemistry. Habitat analyses and conservation plans that do not account for geologic variation could mislead conservation efforts for the Apache trout by failing to recognize inherent differences in habitat quality and potential.
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, M

    Journal of Arizona History Index, M

    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) M McAdams, Cliff, book by, reviewed 26:242 McAdoo, Ellen W. 43:225 McAdoo, W. C. 18:194 McAdoo, William 36:52; 39:225; 43:225 McAhren, Ben 19:353 McAlister, M. J. 26:430 McAllester, David E., book coedited by, reviewed 20:144-46 McAllester, David P., book coedited by, reviewed 45:120 McAllister, James P. 49:4-6 McAllister, R. Burnell 43:51 McAllister, R. S. 43:47 McAllister, S. W. 8:171 n. 2 McAlpine, Tom 10:190 McAndrew, John “Boots”, photo of 36:288 McAnich, Fred, book reviewed by 49:74-75 books reviewed by 43:95-97 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 McArtan, Neill, develops Pastime Park 31:20-22 death of 31:36-37 photo of 31:21 McArthur, Arthur 10:20 McArthur, Charles H. 21:171-72, 178; 33:277 photos 21:177, 180 McArthur, Douglas 38:278 McArthur, Lorraine (daughter), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Lorraine (mother), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Louise, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Perry 43:349 McArthur, Warren, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Warren, Jr. 33:276 article by and about 21:171-88 photos 21:174-75, 177, 180, 187 McAuley, (Mother Superior) Mary Catherine 39:264, 265, 285 McAuley, Skeet, book by, reviewed 31:438 McAuliffe, Helen W.
  • Endlich Mesa Grazing Allotment Agreement

    Endlich Mesa Grazing Allotment Agreement

    WILDLIFE CONFLICT RESOLUTION — SAN JUAN RANGE, CO Endlich Mesa Grazing Allotment Agreement Where conflicts between livestock and wildlife are prolonged and intractable, the National Wildlife Federation believes that public land grazing retirements can provide an equitable CONTACT solution for ranchers and wildlife interests. In coordination Bob McCready with federal land managers, we negotiate with livestock Program Manager ranchers to retire public land livestock grazing allotments 720-340-1209 that experience chronic conflict with wildlife, especially grizzly [email protected] bears, wolves, bison and bighorn sheep. This market-based Andrea Auguiste approach recognizes the economic value of public land Regional Philanthropy livestock grazing permits and fairly compensates ranchers for Director their public land grazing leases. This approach has proven 303-441-5169 a successful model across the west in resolving conflicts [email protected] between livestock and at-risk wildlife. NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION / 240 NORTH HIGGINS, SUITE 2, MISSOULA, MT 59802 / NWF.ORG The Opportunity The Endlich Mesa domestic sheep grazing allotment is located in the southern portion of the spectacular San Juan Range, 20 miles northeast of Durango. Endlich Mesa is within the stunning Weminuche Wilderness, Colorado’s largest wilderness area, and contains the Florida River watershed, which provides the city of Durango’s municipal water. The allotment has been permitted by a local sheep ranching family for decades, and is just a few short miles from the Weminuche herd of bighorn sheep, one of only three herds in the state with a Tier 1 status classification by Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Unfortunately, domestic sheep carry a number of diseases that can and often do, decimate entire herds of Bighorn sheep.
  • New Titles for Spring 2021 Green Trails Maps Spring

    New Titles for Spring 2021 Green Trails Maps Spring

    GREEN TRAILS MAPS SPRING 2021 ORDER FORM recreation • lifestyle • conservation MOUNTAINEERS BOOKS [email protected] 800.553.4453 ext. 2 or fax 800.568.7604 Outside U.S. call 206.223.6303 ext. 2 or fax 206.223.6306 Date: Representative: BILL TO: SHIP TO: Name Name Address Address City State Zip City State Zip Phone Email Ship Via Account # Special Instructions Order # U.S. DISCOUNT SCHEDULE (TRADE ONLY) ■ Terms: Net 30 days. 1 - 4 copies ........................................................................................ 20% ■ Shipping: All others FOB Seattle, except for orders of 25 books or more. FREE 5 - 9 copies ........................................................................................ 40% SHIPPING ON BACKORDERS. ■ Prices subject to change without notice. 10 - 24 copies .................................................................................... 45% ■ New Customers: Credit applications are available for download online at 25 + copies ................................................................45% + Free Freight mountaineersbooks.org/mtn_newstore.cfm. New customers are encouraged to This schedule also applies to single or assorted titles and library orders. prepay initial orders to speed delivery while their account is being set up. NEW TITLES FOR SPRING 2021 Pub Month Title ISBN Price Order February Green Trails Mt. Jefferson, OR No. 557SX 9781680515190 18.00 _____ February Green Trails Snoqualmie Pass, WA No. 207SX 9781680515343 18.00 _____ February Green Trails Wasatch Front Range, UT No. 4091SX 9781680515152 18.00 _____ TOTAL UNITS ORDERED TOTAL RETAIL VALUE OF ORDERED An asterisk (*) signifies limited sales rights outside North America. QTY. CODE TITLE PRICE CASE QTY. CODE TITLE PRICE CASE WASHINGTON ____ 9781680513448 Alpine Lakes East Stuart Range, WA No. 208SX $18.00 ____ 9781680514537 Old Scab Mountain, WA No. 272 $8.00 ____ ____ 9781680513455 Alpine Lakes West Stevens Pass, WA No.
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A

    Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A

    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
  • OREGON GEOLOGY Published by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries

    OREGON GEOLOGY Published by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries

    OREGON GEOLOGY published by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries VOLUME 47. NUMBER 10 OCTOBER 1985 •-_Q OREGON GEOLOGY OIL AND GAS NEWS (ISSN 0164-3304) VOLUME 47, NUMBER 10 OCTOBER 1985 Columbia County Exxon Corporation spudded its GPE Federal Com. I on Published monthly by the Oregon Department of Geology and Min­ September I. The well name is a change from GPE Federal 2, eraI Industries (Volumes 1 through 40 were entitled The Ore Bin). permitted for section 3. T. 4 N .. R. 3 W. Proposed total depth is 12.000 ft. The contractor is Peter Bawden. Governing Board Donald A. Haagensen, Chairman ............. Portland Coos County Allen P. Stinchfield .................... North Bend Amoco Production Company is drilling ahead on Weyer­ Sidney R. Johnson. .. Baker haeuser "F" I in section 10, T. 25 S .. R. 10 W. The well has a projected total depth of 5,900 ft and is being drilled by Taylor State Geologist ..................... Donald A. Hull Drilling. Deputy State Geologist. .. John D. Beaulieu Publications Manager/Editor ............. Beverly F. Vogt Lane County Leavitt's Exploration and Drilling Co. has drilled Merle I to Associate Editor . Klaus K.E. Neuendorf a total depth of 2,870 ft and plugged the well as a dry hole. The well. in section 25. T. 16 S .. R. 5 W .. was drilled 2 mi southeast of Main Office: 910 State Office Building, 1400 SW Fifth Ave­ nue. Portland 9720 I, phone (503) 229-5580. Ty Settles' Cindy I. drilled earlier this year to 1.600 ft. A.M. Jannsen Well Drilling Co.