DOCSLIB.ORG

(Industrial Design) Consent Renewal Application

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Industrial Design) Consent Renewal Application Bachelor of Applied Technology (Industrial Design) Consent Renewal Application Ontario Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology Date of Submission: June 2007 PART A REPORT ON THE DELIVERY OF THE CURRENT CONSENT PROGRAM B.A.T. (Industrial Design)) Part A Consent Renewal Application Table of Contents – Part A Page Submission Checklist for Part A............................................................................................ 1 Appendix 1 College and Program Information...................................................... 4 Appendix 2 Abstract of Proposed Program .......................................................... 5 Appendix 3 Delivery of Current Consent Program Checklist................................ 6 Degree Level Standard Appendix 4.1 Degree Level Standard ..................................................................... 19 Program Content Appendix 6.1.1 Program Advisory Committe ............................................................. 23 Appendix 6.2.1 Professional/Accreditation or Other Requirements............................ 24 Appendix 6.2.2 Letters of Support: Professional/Accreditation of Other Requirements .................................................................................... 24 Appendix 6.3.1 Program Level Learning Outcomes (Met).......................................... 25 Appendix 6.3.3.1 Program Hour/Credit Conversion Justification................................... 29 Appendix 6.3.3.2 Academic Course Schedule .............................................................. 29 Appendix 6.4A Explanation of Added or Dropped “P” Courses ................................. 30 Appendix 6.4.A.1 Added “P” Course Outlines................................................................ 30 Appendix 6.4.B Explanation of Added “O” Courses.................................................... 30 Appendix 6.4.B.1 Added “O” Course Outlines ............................................................... 30 Appendix 6.5.1 Program Structure Requirement........................................................ 31 Appendix 6.5.2 Support for Work Experience............................................................. 31 Appendix 6.5.3 Work Experience Outcomes and Evaluation ..................................... 31 Appendix 6.6 Summary of Program Changes ......................................................... 32 Appendix 5.1.1 Admission Requirements Direct Entry............................................... 33 Appendix 5.1.2 Admission Policies and Procedures for Mature Students.................. 33 Appendix 5.2.1 Credit Transfer/Recognition Policies and Procedures....................... 34 Appendix 5.2.2 Advanced Placement Policies ........................................................... 34 Appendix 5.2.3 Degree Completion Arrangements .................................................... 34 Appendix 5.2.4 Gap Analysis...................................................................................... 34 Appendix 5.2.5 Bridging Courses ............................................................................... 34 Appendix 5.2.6 Admissions Information ..................................................................... 35 Appendix 5.3 Promotion and Graduation Requirements ......................................... 36 Appendix 5.3.1 Student Retention Information........................................................... 36 Program Delivery Standard Appendix 7.1.1 Quality Assurance Policies ............................................................... 37 Appendix 7.1.2 Policy on Student Feedback ............................................................. 37 Appendix 7.1.3 Student Feedback Instruments ......................................................... 37 Appendix 7.2.1 On-line Learning Policies and Practices ........................................... 38 B.A.T. (Industrial Design)) Part A - i Consent Renewal Application Appendix 7.2.2 Academic Community Policies.......................................................... 38 Appendix 7.2.3 Expansion of On-line Learning.......................................................... 38 Appendix 7.2.4 Introduction of On-line Learning Policies .......................................... 38 Capacity to Deliver Standard Appendix 8.2.1 Library Resources............................................................................. 39 Appendix 8.2.2 Computer Access.............................................................................. 40 Appendix 8.2.3 Improvements/Expansion of Classroom Space ................................ 41 Appendix 8.2.4 Laboratories/Equipment.................................................................... 42 Appendix 8.3 Resource Renewal and Upgrading ................................................... 43 Appendix 8.4 Support Services............................................................................... 45 Appendix 8.5 Policies on Faculty ............................................................................ 46 Appendix 8.6.2.A Exception Statements Approved by the President............................ 47 Appendix 8.6.2.B Faculty Qualifications: Discipline Related Courses.......................... 49 Appendix 8.6.2.C Faculty Qualifications: Breadth Courses.......................................... 50 Appendix 8.7 Enrolment Projections and Staffing Implications............................... 51 Credential Recognition Appendix 10.1.1 Regulatory or Licensing Requirements............................................. 52 Appendix 10.1.2 Letters of Support from Regulatory/Licensing Bodies....................... 52 Appendix 9.1.A Credential Recognition...................................................................... 53 Appendix 9.1.B Credit Transfer Recognition .............................................................. 53 Appendix 9.1.C Policy on Informing Students on Recognition ................................... 54 Program Evaluation Appendix 11.1 Periodic Review Policy and Schedule............................................... 55 Appendix 11.2 Update on Program Evaluation Measures ........................................ 55 B.A.T. (Industrial Design)) Part A - ii Consent Renewal Application Submission Checklist for Part A Item Name and Binder Tab Status Submission Checklist for Part A [3] Attached Appendix 1 College and Program Information [3] Attached Appendix 2 Abstract of Proposed Program [3] Attached Appendix 3 Delivery of Current Consent Program Checklist [3] Attached Degree Level Standard Appendix 4.1 Degree Level Standard Summary [3] Attached Program Content Appendix 6.1.1 Program Advisory Committee [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 6.2.1 Professional/Accreditation or Other Requirements [3] Not applicable [ ] Attached Appendix 6.2.2 Letters of Support: Professional/Accreditation or Other [3] Not applicable Requirements [ ] Attached Appendix 6.3.1 Program Level Learning Outcomes (Met) [ ] Not required [3] Attached Appendix 6.3.1.1 Program Level Learning Outcomes (Not Met) [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 6.3.1.1 Program Hour/Credit Conversion Justification [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 6.3.3.2 Academic Course Schedule [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 6.4.A Explanation of Added or Dropped “P” Courses [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 6.4.A.1 Added “P” Course Outlines [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 6.4.B Explanation of Added “O” Courses [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 6.4.B.1 Added “O” Course Outlines [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 6.5.1 Program Structure Requirement [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 6.5.2 Support for Work Experience [3] Not required [ ] Attached B.A.T. (Industrial Design)) Part A - 1 Consent Renewal Application Item Name and Binder Tab Status Appendix 6.5.3 Work Experience Outcomes and Evaluation [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 6.6 Summary of Program Changes [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 5.1.1 Admission Requirements Direct Entry [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 5.1.2 Admission Policies and Procedures for Mature [3] Not required Students [ ] Attached Appendix 5.2.1 Credit Transfer/Recognition Policies and Procedures [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 5.2.2 Advanced Placement Policies [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 5.2.3 Degree Completion Arrangements [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 5.2.4 Gap Analysis [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 5.2.5 Bridging Courses [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 5.2.6 Admissions Information [3] Attached Appendix 5.3 Promotion and Graduation Requirements [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 5.3.1 Student Retention Information [3] Attached Program Delivery Standard Appendix 7.1.1 Quality Assurance Policies [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 7.1.2 Policy on Student Feedback [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 7.1.3 Student Feedback Instruments [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 7.2.1 On-line Learning Policies and Practices [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 7.2.2 Academic Community Policies [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 7.2.3 Expansion of On-line Learning [3] Not required [ ] Attached Appendix 7.2.4 Introduction of On-line Learning Policies [3] Not required [ ] Attached B.A.T. (Industrial Design)) Part A - 2 Consent Renewal Application Item Name and Binder Tab Status Capacity to Deliver Standard Appendix 8.2.1 Library Resources [3] Attached Appendix 8.2.2 Computer Access [3] Attached Appendix 8.2.3 Improvements/Expansion of Classroom Space [3] Attached Appendix 8.2.4 Laboratories/Equipment [3] Attached Appendix
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BOARD of REGENTS AGENDA ITEM 6B STATE of IOWA DECEMBER 5, 2012
    BOARD OF REGENTS AGENDA ITEM 6b STATE OF IOWA DECEMBER 5, 2012 Contact: Diana Gonzalez PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSIGNMENT REPORTS FOR FY 2012 Actions Requested: Receive the professional development assignment reports submitted by the Regent universities for FY 2012. Executive Summary: Each year, the Board of Regents is asked to approve faculty professional development assignments as specified in the Board Policy Manual §4.09. In December 2010 (Agenda Item #5), the Board approved 95 professional development assignments for FY 2012. Board Policy §4.09E directs the institutions to submit a yearly report of the completed professional development assignments. HF 45 specifies that “the board shall annually prepare a report comparing each assignment proposal to the results received.” A brief description of each professional development assignment completed in 2011-2012 is available in Attachments A-C (pages 3-33); this report provides information about the value added to the students, university, and state from the assignments, including more than $9.3 million of funds obtained during or after the faculty member’s professional development assignment; there are a number of grant proposals that have the potential for funding but they are still pending. This report addresses the Board of Regents Strategic Plan priority for “educational excellence and impact” as well as “economic development and vitality.” Background: Review process. A rigorous review process was conducted for each proposed professional development assignment. Faculty recipients were selected on the basis of peer review and recommendation at the department and college levels at each university and final approval by the provost. One of the criteria considered is the impact of the proposed professional development assignment to the university, students, and the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Summaries of Center for Fire Research In-House Projects and Grants - 1990
    NISTIR 4440 CENTER FOR FIRE RESEARCH In-House Projects and Grants - 1990 Sonya M. Cherry, Editor U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology National Engineering Laboratory Center for Fire Research Gaithersburg, Maryland f^l States Department of Commerce I VI I National Institute of Standards and Technology NISTIR 4440 SUMMARIES OF CENTER FOR FIRE RESEARCH IN-HOUSE PROJECTS AND GRANTS - 1990 Sonya M. Cherry, Editor U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology National Engineering Laboratory Center for Fire Research Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899 October 1990 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology, John W. Lyons, Director .>eoL = I. ' •Si V ^ . '',asttst*3 fO'^i - v..-^™ ic.oJorJx>»¥*/& -sS^tfc/uii* i»r.f**-'S4SW&fi " - ' - ^et6f , . 9 •’,-. i-^' 3 . ''4l^r - ti’ V^' 3 .s;#a vw ttM 'Ti * V.: f* PREFACE This report describes the research projects performed in the Center for Fire Research (CFR) and under its grants program during FY 1990. The Center is nationally recognized as the focal point for fire with an extremely competent multi- disciplinary technical staff that is supported by an excellent fire library and extensive laboratory facilities. The Center was created by the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 which authorized the Secretary of Commerce, through the Center, to conduct a fire research program directly or through contracts or grants. Therefore, in addition to its in-house program, the Center maintains a fire research grants program that supplements most of the in-house programs and supports most of the academic fire research in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Selectivity of the Na /K
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The selectivity of the Na+/K+-pump is controlled by binding site protonation and self-correcting occlusion Huan Rui1, Pablo Artigas2, BenoıˆtRoux1* 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States; 2Department of Cell Physiology and Molecular Biophysics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, United States Abstract The Na+/K+-pump maintains the physiological K+ and Na+ electrochemical gradients across the cell membrane. It operates via an ’alternating-access’ mechanism, making iterative transitions between inward-facing (E1) and outward-facing (E2) conformations. Although the general features of the transport cycle are known, the detailed physicochemical factors governing the binding site selectivity remain mysterious. Free energy molecular dynamics simulations show that the ion binding sites switch their binding specificity in E1 and E2. This is accompanied by small structural arrangements and changes in protonation states of the coordinating residues. Additional computations on structural models of the intermediate states along the conformational transition pathway reveal that the free energy barrier toward the occlusion step is considerably increased when the wrong type of ion is loaded into the binding pocket, prohibiting the pump cycle from proceeding forward. This self-correcting mechanism strengthens the overall transport selectivity and protects the stoichiometry of the pump cycle. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.16616.001 Introduction *For correspondence: roux@ The Na+/K+-pump is a primary active membrane transporter present in nearly all animal cells. It uchicago.edu belongs to the P-type ATPase family, which utilizes the energy released from ATP hydrolysis to Competing interests: The move ions against their concentration gradients across a membrane barrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Editon. INSTITUTION Mid-Am Rica Vocational Curriculum Consortium, Stillwater, Okla
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 327 660 CE 056 670 AUTHOR Buck, Sue; And Others TITLE Exploring Aeronautics and Space Technology. Teacher Editon. INSTITUTION Mid-Am rica Vocational Curriculum Consortium, Stillwater, Okla. PUB DATE 91 NOTE 435p. AVATLABLE FROM Mid-America Vocational Curriculum Consortium, Inc., 1500 West Seventh Avenue, Stillwater, OK 74074 (orde: no. 900101: $26.00). PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom Use - Guides (For Teachers) (052) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Education; *Aerospace Technology; Air Transportation; Behavioral Objectives; Career Education; *Communications Satellites; Course Descriptions; Curriculum Guides; Learning Activities; Postsecondary Education; Secondary Education; Space Exploration; Space Sciences; Tests; Units of Study IDENTIFIERS Technology Education ABSTRACT This curriculum guide contains six units of instruction for an introduction to the technology systems in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Designed to !)e used either as a stand-alone publication or to be infused into the instruction and activities of an existing technology education program, this publication describes the interrelationship of the various technology systems in NASA. Introductory materials include a tools, materials, and equipment list; a list of 20 references; an instructional/task analysis that correlates related information with job training; and information on resources for teachers. Each instructional unit includes some or all of the following basic components:
    [Show full text]
  • III. Completed Research Projects
    III. Completed Research Projects “a summary of any research project completed in the preceding biennium;” This section includes summaries of all projects completed, including research projects. •The following documents are summaries of accomplishments for each appropriation year and short abstracts for all projects completed since the previous biennial report of January 15, 2013. •The abstracts describe the general accomplishments of each project for completed projects. See http://www.lccmr.leg.mn. • Research projects have been marked as such in the description. • Full final reports are available at the LCCMR, Room 65 ‐ State Office Building. The abstracts are current as of 12/31/2014. •95 Projects were completed for a total of $59,562,000. •Legal Citations 1. M.L. 2013, Chapter 52, Section 2 2. M.L. 2011, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 3, Section 2 3. M.L. 2010, Chapter 362, Section 2 4. M.L. 2009, Chapter 143, Section 2 5. M.L. 2008, Chapter 367, Section 2 • Spreadsheet of all research projects completed between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014. 1. M.L. 2013 Projects Completed January 15, 2013 – January 15, 2015 MN Laws 2013, Chapter 52, Section 2 M.L. 2013 Projects Completed in 2013‐2014 M.L. 2013 Projects MN Laws 2013, Chapter 52, Section 2 (beginning July 1, 2013) NOTE: For all projects, contact us to obtain the most up‐to‐date work programs for current projects (project updates are required twice each year) or the final reports of completed projects. When available, we have provided links to web sites related to the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcintire Department of Music Newsletter
    University of Virginia McIntire Department of Music Newsletter: 2015-16 Edition Letter from the Chair: A “Banner” Year of Music Synergies This year, for the first time in our nearly 100-year history, students and parents arriving for Family Weekend and Days on the Lawn saw "Music" proudly displayed above the steps of Old Cabell. The banners set the tone for a year in which we celebrated the incredible diversity and quality of our department. We created mash-up, synergistic programming blending various areas of our research. We promoted our scholars, composers, performers and technologists as superstars using a new website and publicity engine. We launched a brand new Performance Concentration for Majors. And we actively engaged in a dialog about the place of Music in the 21st Century University. We challenged ourselves to ask "What is Music?" through a Flash Seminar, and to think globally about the impact of our work. All of these efforts have contributed to a really fantastic year. I invite you to visit the new website and explore the vision. The website features a significant redesign with powerful new tools such as an Audio Lounge, a Music Life Blog, and a dynamic front page that evokes different roles of music in the University. The first slide (also the cover image of this newsletter) is accompanied by the caption, "Music: a place to gather”, and it shows hundreds of students gathered in front of Old Cabell Hall. We strive to make our Music Department a safe space for creative learning, free imagination, celebration of knowledge and good spirited gathering.
    [Show full text]
  • Tampa Bay Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Plan
    Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) TAMPA BAY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN Tampa Bay Local Emergency Planning Committee 4000 Gateway Centre Blvd, Suite 100 Pinellas Park, Florida 33782-6136 (727) 570-5151, Ext. 29 Twenty-Sixth Revision June 2019 In preparing this plan, the Tampa Bay Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) utilized and compiled data contained in the county-prepared Hazardous Materials Annexes and the respective County Comprehensive Emergency Response Plans (CEMP). Neither the LEPC, nor any of its members or staff, attests to the validity or reliability of the information passed through this plan. No conclusions have been drawn as to compliance with any Federal or State laws or regulations pertinent hereto. FORWARD TO TWENTY-SIXTH REVISION The Twenty-Sixth Revision of the Tampa Bay Local Emergency Planning Committee Response Plan contains numerous changes. Most of the notable changes were in association with the updating of population estimates, the extremely hazardous substances facilities and medical facilities, as well as the recognition of the annual HMEP training initiatives and the annual LEPC exercise overview. The COMPLIANCE CRITERIA immediately follows. Hazards Analyses of all Tampa Bay LEPC District facilities have been placed on a schedule so that they are now current for the preceding fiscal year. Analyses are conducted on a July to June cycle, performing 50 percent of the county’s total facilities one year and the remaining 50 percent during the following year. Each year is further divided with the first 50 percent (25 percent of the county’s total facilities) being due by November 1st annually and the second 50 percent (25 percent of the county’s total facilities) being due by February 1st annually.
    [Show full text]
  • 990-PF Filers: Use 5Th Month), 6Th, 9Th, and 12Th Months of the Corporation's Tax Year ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 9 05/15/15 06/15/15 09/15/15 12/15/15 10 Required Installments
    Return of Private Foundation OMB No. 1545-0052 Form 990-PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation Department of the Treasury | Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. 2015 Internal Revenue Service | Information about Form 990-PF and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990pf. Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2015 or tax year beginning , and ending Name of foundation A Employer identification number Robert W. Woodruff Foundation, Inc. 58-1695425 Number and street (or P.O. box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number 191 Peachtree Street, NE 3540 4045226755 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending, check here~| Atlanta, GA 30303-1799 G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here ~~| Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, Address change Name change check here and attach computation ~~~~| H Check type of organization: X Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here ~| I Fair market value of all assets at end of year J Accounting method: X Cash Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (from Part II, col. (c), line 16) Other (specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here ~| | $ 3124081263.
    [Show full text]
  • Glass-Polymer Composite High Pressure Pipes and Joints - Design, Manufacture & Characterize
    FINAL REPORT U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Competitive Academic Agreement Program Glass-Polymer Composite High Pressure Pipes and Joints - Design, Manufacture & Characterize West Virginia University CAAP Final Report Date of Report: September 29, 2018 Contract Number: DTPH5616HCAP02 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Transportation/Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (USDOT-PHMSA) Project Title: Glass-Polymer Composite High Pressure Pipes and Joints - Design, Manufacture & Characterize Prepared by: West Virginia University, Constructed Facilities Center (WVU-CFC) Project PI/co-PI: Hota V. S. GangaRao, Udaya B. Halabe, John Zondlo, Mark Skidmore Graduate Students: Ben Imes, Jonas Kavi, Andrew Pacifico, Ronald Alexander, Andrew Cvetnick, Patrick Sisler Contact Information: Dr. Hota V. S. GangaRao, Professor, CEE Department, WVU Email: [email protected] Phone: 304-293-9986 Project ending date: September 29, 2018 ii Acknowledgement The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding for this project provided by USDOT- PHMSA’s Competitive Academic Agreement Program under Contract No. DTPH5616HCAP02. iii Executive Summary The United States of America has about 2.65 million miles of distribution mains plus transmission lines. Even though it has been established that smaller diameter pipelines are safer to operate, gas pipeline industry needs cost-effective ways to transmit larger volumes of gas over long distances at higher pressures with at least 50 years of service life. Recognizing that current gas pipelines are made primarily of steel which is subjected to corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement, the proposed project focuses on developing glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite pipes including a range of joining systems. A few of the many advantages of GFRP composite pipes are their non-corrosiveness, magnetic transparency, and high strength-to-weight ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • FEBEX II Project THG Laboratory Experiments
    CO 0 O C O <0 CO FEBEX II Project 0 THG Laboratory c o Experiments O 0 O Q 3 Q enresa publication tecnica 09/2004 FEBEX II Project THG Laboratory Experiments Edited by: T. Missana CIEMAT enresa ENRESA Direction de Ciencia y Tecnologia Emilio Vargas n° 7 28043 Madrid - Espana Tfno.: 91 5 668 1 00 Fax: 91 5 668 169 www.enresa.es Disen o y production: TransEdit Imprime: GRAFISTAFF, S.L. ISSN: 7 734-380X D.L.M-54 7 73-2004 Diciembre de 2004 This report has been drawn up within the context of the FEBEX project. Its contents represents only the opinion of the authors, which do not necessarily coincide with those of the other participants in the said project. Authors: CIEMAT: A M3. Fernandez, M. Garcia-Gutierrez, Ni. Mingarro, l Missana, P. Rivas. CSIC: E. Caballero, F. J. Huertas, S. Garcla-Palma, C. Jimenez de Cisneros, J. Linares, M. L. Rozalen. PSI: B. Baeyens, M. H. Bradbury. VET: A Muurinen. EMPRESARIOS AGRUPAOOS: J. L. Cormenzana fable of contents Table of contents Table of contents RESUMEN..................................................................................................................... 1 ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 9 2. FEBEX BENTONITE..................................................................................................... 13 3. POREWATER IN THE CLAY BARRIER...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines in View Cc
    PHILIPPINES IN VIEW 2021 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Overall TV Market Environment ........................................................................ 2 Chapter 2: Online Curated Content (OCC) Market Environment ....................................... 13 Chapter 3: Traditional Pay TV Market Environment ......................................................... 45 Chapter 4: Piracy in the Philippines: Piracy and Unauthorized Distribution for Online and Traditional TV .................................................................................................................. 97 Chapter 5: Regulatory Environment for Digital Content ........................................................ 102 References ..................................................................................................................... 113 Annex A: Top TV Programs ............................................................................................. 121 Annex B: Glossary of Acronyms ...................................................................................... 125 1 Chapter 1: Overall TV Market Environment The disruptions to the Philippine television (TV) industry over recent years are many and the most recent of them, the 2019 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), has not made things easier. In June 2020, the World Economic Forum cited the myriad ways the pandemic has affected the media industry from content creators to distributors, saying that while consumer demand for content has skyrocketed due to lockdowns and the prevalence of remote
    [Show full text]
  • THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA Context and Commission
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Context and Commission in Large-Scale Texted Works of Libby Larsen A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of The Benjamin T. Rome School of Music Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Deborah B. Crall Washington, D.C. 2013 Context and Commission in Large-Scale Texted Works of Libby Larsen Deborah B. Crall, Ph.D. Director: Grayson Wagstaff, Ph.D. Libby Larsen (b. 1950) is recognized as one of the foremost composers of her generation, as well as one of the most performed. A prolific composer, she produces at least one large-scale piece a year. In an era when classically trained composers conventionally earn their living in an academic environment, Larsen makes her livelihood as a composer in the “classical” or concert field. In this way she exemplifies a shift in composer economics, as many composers have abandoned the academic life in favor of self-promotion. This dissertation examines musical patronage in the United States in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries by exploring the ways Larsen has developed commissions as an independent artist, incorporating the complex relationships that exist among composer and commissioner in the process of composing large works. Thus patronage, politics, audience, and composition are all intertwined in compelling ways. These relationships are shown by examining six specific works: three operas, Frankenstein, the Modern Prometheus , Eric Hermannson’s Soul , Barnum’s Bird , one choral symphony, Coming Forth Into Day , one cantata, Eleanor Roosevelt (1996), and one oratorio, The Triptych .
    [Show full text]