Trinity Leeds Sydney Monorail River Plate House
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement
Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement VOLUME NUMBER: PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE NUMBER: EN010093 DOCUMENT REFERENCE: 07 7. 3 November 2018 Revision 0 APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Act 2008 | Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement - Document Reference 7.3 Harry’s Yard, 176-178 Newhall St, Birmingham, B3 1SJ T: +44 (0)121 454 4171 E:[email protected] Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement - Document Reference 7.3 Contents Summary 3.4 Site Analysis 3.4.1 REP Site 1.0 Introduction 3.4.2 Sun Path Analysis 1.1 Introduction 3.4.3 Access 1.1.1 Cory Riverside Energy Holdings Limited 3.4.4 Site Opportunities and Constraints 1.1.2 Riverside Resource Recovery Facility 1.2 Purpose of the Design and Access Statement 4.0 Design Process 4.1 Overview of the Design Process to date 2.0 The Proposed Development 4.2 Good Design Principles 2.1 Overview 2.2 Key Components of the Proposed Development 5.0 Illustrative Masterplan 2.2.1 The Energy Recovery Facility 5.1 Introduction 2.2.2 Anaerobic Digestion Facility 5.2 Illustrative Masterplan Proposals 2.2.3 Solar Photovoltaic Panels 5.2.1 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 1 - North to South - Stack South 2.2.4 Battery Storage 5.2.2 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 2 - North to South - Stack North 2.2.5 Other Elements 5.2.3 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 3 - East to West - Stack West 3.0 Site Overview 5.2.4 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 4 - East to West - Stack East -
AATTC DL Lists 12 E7.Xlsx
DISTRIBUTION LIST April 2012 The AATTC Distribution Service aims to supply as many current Australian timetables and information brochures as possible. It also provides historical material from Australia and overseas as it becomes available. Some of the main items of interest in this month’s Distribution List include: • ARTC Master Train Plan (Working Timetable) from 1 April 2012 (Item 1). • Some old interstate train timetables (Items 2, 3, 4) • More CityRail and CountryLink train rosters (Item 5-9). • Another set of RailCorp Freight Working Timetables, this time from 31 March 2012 (Item 12). • Possibly the last Travel Guide to be issued for the Sydney Light Rail and Monorail (Item 13). • Timetables from Upper Darling Range Branch railway in Western Australia (Item 22) and a history of the line (Item 100). These came from a presentation by David Hennell to the Melbourne Division meeting in March 2012. • A selection of bus timetables in northern NSW (Items 33 – 39). • The heaviest timetable in this List: Ballarat Transit – it weighs 234 grams (Item 47). • Complete set of the Transperth bus timetables issued on 19 February 2012 (Item 54). • Sets of the Mornington Peninsula Dial a Bus door to door bus services from many localities (Item 87). April 2012 items were supplied by: Steve Bigwood, Barry Blair, Adrian Dessanti, Scott Ferris, Hilaire Fraser, Frank Goldthorpe, Stephen Gray, Robert Henderson, David Hennell, Peter Hobbis, Les Hyland, Victor Isaacs, Tony McIlwain, Len Regan, Lourie Smit, Peter Walhouse, Roger Wheaton, David Whiteford, Sydney Grab Box. Payments for orders or for creating advance credit can be made by: • Postage stamps (any denominations). -
Site Analysis
SITE ANALYSIS Site location + local context The Haymarket takes its name from the local neighbourhood. It sits entirely within an urban context and is bounded by the Pier Street flyover to the north, Harbour and Hay Streets, mixed, low-level commercial streets to the east and south respectively, and the light rail corridor to the west. The site is currently occupied by the Sydney Entertainment Centre in the east and a large multi-storey car park to the west. The raised Sydney monorail, which runs along its western, southern and eastern perimeter and includes the Paddy’s Market station, is to be closed and dismantled in June 2013. The local streets provide good connections into the city and university precincts and wider connections to Central Station. Connectivity to the west has historically been poor, after the introduction of a goods line segregated Ultimo and Pyrmont from the city. Pedestrian access is limited to the heavily trafficked Pier Street with stairs and ramps providing access to grade, and a footbridge from the Powerhouse Museum crossing Darling Drive and connecting with Paddy’s Market monorail station on the south- west corner of the site. SHFA is managing the creation of a new pedestrian corridor called the Goods Line (formerly known as the Ultimo Pedestrian Network or UPN). This project seeks to turn a disused goods line into a linear park supporting a range of activities – similar to the High Line in New York. This new corridor will land at the south-western corner of the site. The existing facilities to the north of the site within SICEEP will be redeveloped in a programme of regeneration to be completed by 2016. -
Sustainability Report 2018 2 Sustainability Report 2018 Cory Riverside Energy
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 2 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 CORY RIVERSIDE ENERGY CONTENTS Report highlights 3 About Cory Riverside Energy 5 Chair’s statement 10 CEO’s statement 11 Scope of the report 12 Governance and Materiality 14 Our sustainable business strategy 17 Our sustainability performance 21 Making london a more sustainable city 22 Our sustainability performance against priority areas 30 Our performance scorecard and future plans 40 Appendix 49 Report highlights In 2018, we established our sustainable business strategy to help drive performance across our business in line with five key priority areas aimed at: • supporting London’s circular economy by processing recyclable waste, enabling resource recovery from non-recyclable residual waste, and creating by-products for use in construction; • reducing the level of waste sent to landfill and exported abroad; and • partnering to increase awareness of recycling, the circular economy and the role of the River Thames for freight transportation. 4 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 CORY RIVERSIDE ENERGY REPORT HIGHLIGHTS Our sustainable business strategy seeks to improve BUSINESS INTEGRITY our operations to support London’s aims of becoming We have instigated a health and safety culture change programme a sustainable city, and support the nine United to reduce the incidents and accidents we have in our operations. Nations Sustainable Development Goals that we have We have increased awareness and understanding of modern identified as having the greatest ability to impact. We slavery and anti-bribery and corruption amongst employees and invite you to explore our 2018 sustainability report for our suppliers, through enhanced policies and procedures. a greater insight into Cory’s key priorities, which are At our energy from waste facility, we have remained fully compliant summarised below. -
Monorail & Light Rail
2013 SYDNEY MONORAIL & LIGHT RAIL Advertising Media Kit Sydney Monorail and Metro Light Rail are unique transportation networks connecting Sydney’s key leisure, retail and dining precincts with surrounding transportation hubs and inner city residential areas. Advertising in these unique environments not only offers advertisers high-reach and frequency opportunities to broadcast their message to workers, tourists, shoppers and residents – they also offer a unique level of consumer engagement. Vehicle Liveries deliver an unavoidable message to passengers, pedestrian and vehicle traffic. While with Station Advertising, consumers have plenty of time to read, consider and take in your message with an average waiting time of three minutes on Sydney Monorail and ten minutes on Metro Light Rail stations. © Metro Transport Sydney Pty Ltd 2012 ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITIES Why outdoor (or out of home) advertising? In today’s busy and fast–paced life, Outdoor is perfect for reaching people on the go and reaches audiences that other media find hard and cost–prohibitive to reach. For consumers there is no avoiding Outdoor; it is free and cannot be turned off. Outdoor is about delivering impact and awareness – it captures ‘share of mind’ and produces measurable results. No other media can match the impact and reach against the investment. Outdoor advertising at its best achieves direct GLOBAL FINDINGS ACROSS MEDIA Revenue communication with consumers ROI • Where they live, work, and play • Where they drive and shop • Where they commute, and E • Where they -
2001 Hotel Information
five-star hotel, the Sheraton On The Park features 558 rooms and suites, two bars and two restaurants. The hotel offers guests outstanding services A and facilities, including: 24-hour room service, in-room safety deposit boxes, same day laundry and dry cleaning, fully equipped health club, indoor heated swim- ming pool, whirlpool spa, massage, saunas, steam rooms, solarium, and outside ter- 161 Elizabeth St, , Sydney, NSW, 2000 races with sun lounges. In-room facilities include: oversized TV and cable, compli- Phone: +61 2 9286 6000 mentary tea or coffee served in guest’s room, bottled water in each guest room, non- Fax: +61 2 9286 6565 smoking rooms on request, hypo-allergenic pillows, and stereo system with CD player, Web site: www.sheraton.com cassette and radio. E-mail: [email protected] The Sheraton On The Park is one block from the heart of Sydney’s retail precinct and within easy reach of many of Sydney’s attractions, such as the Opera House, the Harbour Bridge, the historic Rocks area, Sydney Tower, Chinatown, the Art Gallery of New South Wales, the Australian Museum, cinemas, theatres, and the restaurants and nightlife of Oxford Street. Sydney’s monorail is nearby and takes just a few minutes to reach Darling Harbour, the Maritime Museum, IMAX Theatre, the Sydney Aquarium, and the Powerhouse Museum. The Sheraton On The Park is offering AIB members a standard room for the special conference rate of $245 (Australian dollars) per day inclusive of all local taxes. This rate will extend from Monday, November 12th to Thursday, November 22nd. -
'Ungovernable'? Financialisation and the Governance Of
Governing the ‘ungovernable’? Financialisation and the governance of transport infrastructure in the London ‘global city-region’ February 2018 Peter O’Briena* Andy Pikea and John Tomaneyb aCentre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK NE1 7RU. Email: peter.o’[email protected]; [email protected] bBartlett School of Planning, University College London, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, 620 Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, UK WC1H 0NN. Email: [email protected] *Corresponding author 1 Abstract The governance of infrastructure funding and financing at the city-region scale is a critical aspect of the continued search for mechanisms to channel investment into the urban landscape. In the context of the global financial crisis, austerity and uneven growth, national, sub-national and local state actors are being compelled to adopt the increasingly speculative activities of urban entrepreneurialism to attract new capital, develop ‘innovative’ financial instruments and models, and establish new or reform existing institutional arrangements for urban infrastructure governance. Amidst concerns about the claimed ‘ungovernability’ of ‘global’ cities and city-regions, governing urban infrastructure funding and financing has become an acute issue. Infrastructure renewal and development are interpreted as integral to urban growth, especially to underpin the size and scale of large cities and their significant contributions within national economies. Yet, oovercoming fragmented local jurisdictions to improve the governance and economic, social and environmental development of major metropolitan areas remains a challenge. The complex, and sometimes conflicting and contested inter-relationships at stake raise important questions about the role of the state in wrestling with entrepreneurial and managerialist governance imperatives. -
North London Joint Waste Strategy - SEA Draft, May 2008
The North London Joint Waste Strategy - SEA Draft, May 2008 - North London Joint Waste Strategy SEA Draft May 2008 North London Waste Authority Unit 169, Lee Valley Technopark Ashley Road Tottenham N17 9LN Page 1 The North London Joint Waste Strategy - SEA Draft, May 2008 - FOREWORD Managing North London’s Waste The seven North London boroughs and the North London Waste Authority have achieved much in recent years, through co-ordinated and targeted action on waste prevention, recycling and composting. Our services have never been better. This strategy will be the foundation of still greater improvements as we start to develop and implement the next generation of waste services that will treat waste as a resource and will minimise environmental impacts, particularly those which may contribute to climate change. Above all we will ensure a balanced approach, with value for money on behalf of local council tax payers being essential if waste is truly to be managed in the best interests of North London. This work, however, will need everyone to play their part – all residents, all businesses, all local groups and organisations, and all public services must work to minimise the amount of waste we produce and maximise the amount we recycle and compost. I hope very much you will join us in this endeavour. Councillor Brian Coleman AM, FRSA Chairman of the North London Waste Authority Page 2 The North London Joint Waste Strategy - SEA Draft, May 2008 - Contents Chapter 1: Introduction Page 4 Chapter 2: Background Page 10 Chapter 3: Statutory Requirements -
London Environment Strategy REPORT to the MAYOR on CONSULTATION on the DRAFT LONDON ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY
London Environment Strategy REPORT TO THE MAYOR ON CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT LONDON ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority May 2018 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Photographs © Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report CONTENTS 1 Executive summary 3 2 Introduction and background 7 What the strategy must contain 7 Draft strategy aims 7 Purpose of this report 8 Draft London Plan 9 3 Consultation process 10 The draft strategy consultation 10 Digital engagement with the draft strategy 12 Additional public engagement with the draft strategy 17 Technical stakeholder engagement with the draft strategy 18 How the consultation responses were analysed 19 4 Main issues raised, and proposed strategy changes 23 General 24 Air quality 36 Green infrastructure 55 Climate change mitigation and energy (CCME) 65 Waste 83 Adapting to climate change 100 Ambient noise 109 Low carbon circular economy (LCCE) 122 GLA group operations – leading by example 128 What can Londoners do to help? 128 Key performance indicators 129 Integrated Impact Assessment 130 5 Conclusions and recommendations 134 6 Next steps 135 7 Abbreviations 136 8 Glossary 137 9 Appendices 138 London Environment Strategy – Consultation Response Report 2 Appendix 1: Examples of the four campaign letters received as part of -
Delivering Urban Energy Infrastructure: the Capacity of Planning and Governance Networks in the Cases of Barcelona, Burlington, Lerwick, London, and Toronto
Delivering urban energy infrastructure: the capacity of planning and governance networks in the cases of Barcelona, Burlington, Lerwick, London, and Toronto Sarah E Cary University College London Research Degree: PhD, the Bartlett School of Planning 1 Declaration I, Sarah E Cary, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract District heating and cooling (DHC) systems are a sound solution to environmental, energy security, climate change, and fuel poverty concerns in cities. As an environmental policy goal not fully controlled by government and subject to complex multi-actor negotiations, building DHC can be understood as requiring network governance patterns of behaviour. This thesis investigates the role of planning in delivering DHC, employing a conceptual framework of Actor-Centered Institutionalism to unravel the relationships between industry, government, and citizen organizations in governance networks. It contributes to a growing area of study on the intersection of urban development, energy infrastructure, and environmental policy goals. It responds to calls for further practical research on governance patterns of behaviour, applying a recognised network governance approach to the analysis of five international case studies. It also investigates the weight of institutional context and the purported connection between network interaction characteristics and policy outcomes. The research categorises a range of potential roles for planning organisations and planning interventions in governance networks for DHC. The comparative analysis suggests that planning organisations rarely negotiate for DHC but that planning interventions are regularly used to initiate governance networks for DHC and to shape negotiations by other actors. -
Submission Regarding Heritage Impacts and Demolition Plan
Submission regarding heritage impacts and demolition plan Request for modification to heritage impact statement and demolition plan to recognise the significance of the Harbourside Shopping Centre architecture and allow monorail station structure to be removed in a manner that it, or at least key components of it, could be sustainably re-used as a home in the outer suburbs of Sydney I request that: • The heritage impact statement be amended to acknowledge the significance of the Darling Harbour redevelopment of the 1980s, and in particular the Rouse-inspired design of the Harbourside shopping centre that was likely the only Australian manifestation of the Rouse “Festival Marketplace” idea on which numerous projects, including Harbourside, were based internationally during that era. • The demolition plan for the Harbourside Shopping Centre, Darling Harbour Redevelopment be modified to allow for removal of all or part of the monorail station attached to Harbourside, scheduled for Stage 2 of the demolition, in a form suitable to be adaptively re- used as a personal home in the outer suburbs. The 1980s Harbourside Shopping Centre development is more significant from the standpoint of architectural heritage than the project documentation seems to describe. In the 1980s, James Rouse created the “Festival Marketplace” idea that was realised for urban renewal in locations such as Boston and Baltimore in America. Darling Harbour’s Festival Marketplace, now called the Harbourside Shopping Centre, was an embodiment of that in Sydney. Interestingly, if you look at just the right vintage photographs of Baltimore HarbourPlace, you’ll clearly see the influence it had on Darling Harbour’s Harbourside Shopping Centre. -
The City of the Future
Urban Planning (ISSN: 2183–7635) 2018, Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 1–20 DOI: 10.17645/up.v3i2.1247 Article The City of the Future Garry Glazebrook 1,* and Peter Newman 2 1 Department of Design, Architecture and Building, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute (CUSP), Perth, WA 6845, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author Submitted: 31 October 2017 | Accepted: 5 March 2018 | Published: 24 April 2018 Abstract Limiting global warming to 1.5 °C will require rapid decarbonisation of the world’s electricity and transport systems. This must occur against a background of continuing urbanisation and the shift to the information economy. While replacement of fossil fuels in electricity generation is underway, urban transport is currently dominated by petrol and diesel-powered ve- hicles. The City of the Future will need to be built around a different transport and urban paradigm. This article argues that the new model will be a polycentric city linked by fast electric rail, with local access based on autonomous “community”- owned electric cars and buses supplemented by bicycles, electric bikes and scooters, with all electricity generated from renewables. Less space will be wasted on roads and parking, enabling higher accessibility yet more usable public open space. Building the cities of the future will require national governments to accelerate local initiatives through appropri- ate policy settings and strategic investment. The precise way in which individual cities move into the future will vary, and the article illustrates how the transformation could work for Australian cities, like Sydney, currently some of the most car dependent in the world, using new financial and city partnerships.