DOCSLIB.ORG

Upper Lee Valley Development Infrastructure Study | Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Upper Lee Valley Development Infrastructure Study | Final Report Upper Lee Valley Transport for London Development Infrastructure Study Final Report Our ref: 22763001 September 2015 Upper Lee Valley Transport for London Development Infrastructure Study Final Report Our ref: 22763001 September 2015 Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave Transport for London 28-32 Upper Ground Windsor House London SE1 9PD 42-50 Victoria Street London SW1H 0TL +44 20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for Transport for London. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer Davies Gleave has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 Aims and Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 2 Limitations of Study ...................................................................................................................... 6 Contents of Report ....................................................................................................................... 6 2 Planned Development – Base Scenario ................................................................................ 7 Development ................................................................................................................................ 7 Land Values ................................................................................................................................. 14 3 Social Infrastructure – Base Scenario ................................................................................. 19 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Education .................................................................................................................................... 20 Healthcare .................................................................................................................................. 23 4 Transport Infrastructure – Base Scenario ........................................................................... 28 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 28 Rail and Stations Improvements ................................................................................................. 28 Bus Improvements ...................................................................................................................... 30 Walking and Cycling Improvements ........................................................................................... 30 Highway Improvements .............................................................................................................. 33 Public Realm ............................................................................................................................... 35 5 Utility Infrastructure – Base Scenario ................................................................................ 36 Flood Risk Management ............................................................................................................. 36 Waste .......................................................................................................................................... 37 Decentralised Energy Systems .................................................................................................... 38 Electricity .................................................................................................................................... 38 Gas .............................................................................................................................................. 39 Water .......................................................................................................................................... 39 Broadband .................................................................................................................................. 39 6 Base Scenario Funding Gap ............................................................................................... 40 September 2015 Model Purpose ........................................................................................................................... 40 Model Assumptions .................................................................................................................... 40 Funding Gap – All base schemes ................................................................................................ 43 Prioritisation of Schemes ............................................................................................................ 44 Funding Gap – Priority Schemes only ......................................................................................... 45 7 Funding Potential ............................................................................................................. 46 Potential Funding Sources .......................................................................................................... 46 Mayoral CIL ................................................................................................................................. 46 Tax Increment Financing (TIF)..................................................................................................... 47 Contributions from Council Tax .................................................................................................. 47 New Homes Bonus ...................................................................................................................... 48 Contributions from Stamp Duty, Land Tax (SDLT) ...................................................................... 48 Workplace Parking Levy (WPL) ................................................................................................... 49 Structures to facilitate the delivery of infrastructure................................................................. 50 Mayoral Development Corporations (MDCs) ............................................................................. 50 Affordable Housing Tests ............................................................................................................ 51 Funding Mechanism Modelling Assumptions and Revenues ..................................................... 52 Council tax .................................................................................................................................. 56 New Homes Bonus ...................................................................................................................... 57 Impact on ULV Funding Gap ....................................................................................................... 58 Funding Constraints - Mayoral Area Plans ................................................................................. 59 8 Higher Growth Scenarios – General Approach ................................................................... 60 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 60 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 60 9 Four-Tracking Scenario ..................................................................................................... 68 Development .............................................................................................................................. 68 Social Infrastructure ................................................................................................................... 68 Transport Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 69 Funding Gap ................................................................................................................................ 70 10 Crossrail 2 Scenario .......................................................................................................... 72 Development .............................................................................................................................. 72 September 2015 Social Infrastructure ................................................................................................................... 72 Transport Infrastructure ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement
    Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement VOLUME NUMBER: PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE NUMBER: EN010093 DOCUMENT REFERENCE: 07 7. 3 November 2018 Revision 0 APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Act 2008 | Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement - Document Reference 7.3 Harry’s Yard, 176-178 Newhall St, Birmingham, B3 1SJ T: +44 (0)121 454 4171 E:[email protected] Riverside Energy Park Design and Access Statement - Document Reference 7.3 Contents Summary 3.4 Site Analysis 3.4.1 REP Site 1.0 Introduction 3.4.2 Sun Path Analysis 1.1 Introduction 3.4.3 Access 1.1.1 Cory Riverside Energy Holdings Limited 3.4.4 Site Opportunities and Constraints 1.1.2 Riverside Resource Recovery Facility 1.2 Purpose of the Design and Access Statement 4.0 Design Process 4.1 Overview of the Design Process to date 2.0 The Proposed Development 4.2 Good Design Principles 2.1 Overview 2.2 Key Components of the Proposed Development 5.0 Illustrative Masterplan 2.2.1 The Energy Recovery Facility 5.1 Introduction 2.2.2 Anaerobic Digestion Facility 5.2 Illustrative Masterplan Proposals 2.2.3 Solar Photovoltaic Panels 5.2.1 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 1 - North to South - Stack South 2.2.4 Battery Storage 5.2.2 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 2 - North to South - Stack North 2.2.5 Other Elements 5.2.3 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 3 - East to West - Stack West 3.0 Site Overview 5.2.4 Illustrative Masterplan Proposal 4 - East to West - Stack East
    [Show full text]
  • Tottenham Hale Station, Station Road, London, N17 9LR
    planning report D&P/3341/01 25 February 2014 Tottenham Hale Station, Station Road, London, N17 9LR in the London Borough of Haringey planning application no. HGY/2013/2610 Strategic planning application stage 1 referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal Works to extend the operational railway station at Tottenham Hale including; the creation of a new station entrance; enlarged station concourse; improved access and a new ‘Access for All’ bridge; extension of the existing footbridge to form a new station entrance from Hale Village; relocation of the station vent shaft and provision of a new station control facility; provision of retail units and associated works, and; the closure of the existing Ferry Lane subway. The applicant The applicant is London Underground Ltd and the architect is Landolt + Brown. Strategic issues The principle of the station redevelopment is strongly supported in strategic terms, as it will improve the layout, connectivity and access to, and within, the station. Whilst the design is also broadly supported, some further design development is encouraged together with further exploration on step-free access to Hale Village. The proposals are also strongly supported in transport terms, subject to some further information being provided. Recommendation That Haringey Council be advised that the application is strongly supported broadly complies with the London Plan but that the issues set out in paragraph 43 of this report should be addressed before the scheme is referred back to the Mayor. Context 1 On 22 January 2014 the Mayor of London received documents from Haringey Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop East
    Co-Making: Research into London’s Open access Makerspaces and Shared Workshops Workshop East January 2015 Co-Making Spaces Study © Workshop East 1 Contents Executive summary 4 Introduction 8 A full report prepared for the London Legacy Development Corporation Key Definitions 9 and the Greater London Authority Methodology 10 Disciplines 12 Background 14 1: Initial findings and overview 17 Map of co-making spaces 18 Summary 38 Research 2014 Published January 2015 2: Workshop Profiles 39 Profiled organisations 40 Chart of profiled organisations 44 3: Themes & Case Studies 47 3.1: Setup & Management 51 Themes & Trends 74 by Workshop East 3.2: Supporting Enterprise & Business Growth 91 Themes & Trends 96 3.3: Community & Placemaking 103 with Themes & Trends 108 Engel Hadley Kirk & Rhianon Morgan-Hatch 4. Conclusions & Recommendations 110 4.1 Setup, management and space requirements 110 4.2 Supporting Enterprise & Business Growth 111 4.3 Community & Placemaking 113 4.4 Planning Strategy 114 4.5 Public Sector Collaboration 116 Glossary 119 Co-making spaces - data table 120 List of Supplementary Data 124 2 Co-Making Spaces Study © Workshop East Co-Making Spaces Study © Workshop East 3 Executive summary Workshop East was commissioned by the The second section profiles 22 spaces located London Legacy Development Corporation across London. It illustrates a variety of (LLDC) and the Greater London Authority operational models within the sector. This (GLA) to undertake research into ‘co-making’ section of information provides a greater level within London. of detail from a selection of representative spaces. Co-making as a sector and as a type of workplace was highlighted in the Local Gathered through visits and interviews, this Economy Study1 and the Artist’s Workspace information is presented in photographic and Study2 produced in 2014 by We Made That, chart form to invite constructive comparisons and in the 2014 GLA commissioned report between spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan - GLA Budget Update 2011/12 – 2014/15
    Transport for London Business Plan - GLA Budget Update 2011/12 – 2014/15 MAYOR OF LONDON Transport for London Transport for London > Business Plan Update and GLA Budget 2011/12 – 2014/15 Contents Introduction 2 Efficient and effective business operations 5 Crossrail 7 London Underground and London Rail 9 Surface Transport 14 Appendix: GLA tables and notes to tables 18 Note that totals in the tables may appear to be incorrect due to rounding 1 Transport for London > Business Plan Update and GLA Budget 2011/12 – 2014/15 Introduction London relies on a dependable and efficient transport system more than anywhere else in the country. The excellent outcome Transport for London (TfL) secured from the 2010 Spending Review, which enabled Crossrail and the Tube upgrade to proceed and protected London’s extensive bus network, reflects both London’s position as the engine of the UK economy and TfL’s reputation for effective delivery. In March 2011, following the Spending Review, TfL published a Business Plan to 2014/15 setting out its plans to modernise London’s transport system, supporting the Mayor’s vision for London as a world-class city. This Business Plan update, for consideration as part of the Mayor’s Budget for 2012/13 - 2014/15, reflects TfL’s latest financial forecasts, and highlights progress made towards achieving the milestones set out in the published Business Plan together with any new developments. TfL remains on target to deliver against all its key milestones. By reaffirming TfL’s ongoing commitment to operational delivery and investment in London’s infrastructure, this update provides vital stability and continuity for customers, business groups and other stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhoods in England Rated E for Green Space, Friends of The
    Neighbourhoods in England rated E for Green Space, Friends of the Earth, September 2020 Neighbourhood_Name Local_authority Marsh Barn & Widewater Adur Wick & Toddington Arun Littlehampton West and River Arun Bognor Regis Central Arun Kirkby Central Ashfield Washford & Stanhope Ashford Becontree Heath Barking and Dagenham Becontree West Barking and Dagenham Barking Central Barking and Dagenham Goresbrook & Scrattons Farm Barking and Dagenham Creekmouth & Barking Riverside Barking and Dagenham Gascoigne Estate & Roding Riverside Barking and Dagenham Becontree North Barking and Dagenham New Barnet West Barnet Woodside Park Barnet Edgware Central Barnet North Finchley Barnet Colney Hatch Barnet Grahame Park Barnet East Finchley Barnet Colindale Barnet Hendon Central Barnet Golders Green North Barnet Brent Cross & Staples Corner Barnet Cudworth Village Barnsley Abbotsmead & Salthouse Barrow-in-Furness Barrow Central Barrow-in-Furness Basildon Central & Pipps Hill Basildon Laindon Central Basildon Eversley Basildon Barstable Basildon Popley Basingstoke and Deane Winklebury & Rooksdown Basingstoke and Deane Oldfield Park West Bath and North East Somerset Odd Down Bath and North East Somerset Harpur Bedford Castle & Kingsway Bedford Queens Park Bedford Kempston West & South Bedford South Thamesmead Bexley Belvedere & Lessness Heath Bexley Erith East Bexley Lesnes Abbey Bexley Slade Green & Crayford Marshes Bexley Lesney Farm & Colyers East Bexley Old Oscott Birmingham Perry Beeches East Birmingham Castle Vale Birmingham Birchfield East Birmingham
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Water: Investing in Enfield's Future
    Meridian Water: Investing in Enfield’s Future Opportunity creation: employment, education and skills DRAFT Contents Section 1: Introduction Section 2: Introducing Meridian Water Section 3: Vision and Objectives Section 4: Challenges Section 5: Opportunities Section 6: Delivery Mechanism Section 7: Building Through the Stages Section 8: Taking Practical Action - Regeneration Themes Section 9: Action Plan & Measuring Performance This framework has been produced by Temple and Regeneris on behalf of the London Borough of Enfield for the Meridian Water Development. For all enquiries please contact: Matt Davies [email protected] www.enfield.gov.uk DRAFT 1 Introduction A vibrant new part of Enfield is being This Framework has been compiled The suite of documents connect in the created that will provide 8,000 new through an analysis of baseline following way: homes and over 3,000 new jobs. It will characteristics, trends affecting the site be a bustling new part of our global over a 40 year timescale, projections city, grounded in the Lee Valley and of the economy, housing, lifestyles and Baseline Report generating continued growth in the environment and a selected review of London-Stansted-Cambridge Corridor best practice around the world. (LSCC). Site Projections Report Accompanying the framework is an Action This Meridian Water Regeneration Plan describing the actions to be taken Framework (the Framework or MWRF) over the short, medium and long term, to Regeneration Framework forms the interim strategic approach to realise the ambitions for Meridian Water. achieving sustainable development and long term growth for Meridian Water. Having identified the necessary actions, Action Plan a Delivery Mechanism model will be It forms an integral part of the developer developed with the preferred Developer procurement with bidders expected to Partner.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report 2018 2 Sustainability Report 2018 Cory Riverside Energy
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 2 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 CORY RIVERSIDE ENERGY CONTENTS Report highlights 3 About Cory Riverside Energy 5 Chair’s statement 10 CEO’s statement 11 Scope of the report 12 Governance and Materiality 14 Our sustainable business strategy 17 Our sustainability performance 21 Making london a more sustainable city 22 Our sustainability performance against priority areas 30 Our performance scorecard and future plans 40 Appendix 49 Report highlights In 2018, we established our sustainable business strategy to help drive performance across our business in line with five key priority areas aimed at: • supporting London’s circular economy by processing recyclable waste, enabling resource recovery from non-recyclable residual waste, and creating by-products for use in construction; • reducing the level of waste sent to landfill and exported abroad; and • partnering to increase awareness of recycling, the circular economy and the role of the River Thames for freight transportation. 4 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2018 CORY RIVERSIDE ENERGY REPORT HIGHLIGHTS Our sustainable business strategy seeks to improve BUSINESS INTEGRITY our operations to support London’s aims of becoming We have instigated a health and safety culture change programme a sustainable city, and support the nine United to reduce the incidents and accidents we have in our operations. Nations Sustainable Development Goals that we have We have increased awareness and understanding of modern identified as having the greatest ability to impact. We slavery and anti-bribery and corruption amongst employees and invite you to explore our 2018 sustainability report for our suppliers, through enhanced policies and procedures. a greater insight into Cory’s key priorities, which are At our energy from waste facility, we have remained fully compliant summarised below.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Heat Networks Understanding the Challenge
    Delivering Heat Networks Understanding the challenge District heating networks are a key component These challenges and complexities are best of a future low carbon London. They will addressed by bringing together engineering, provide the means to capture and distribute planning, finance and regulatory expertise into heat from a diverse mix of primary as well as an integrated project delivery unit. secondary heat sources to serve homes and businesses. Development of district heating Arup’s multidisciplinary approach to district networks at scale across the capital over the heating project delivery underpins our work next ten years is therefore essential for London in London and across the UK. We support to meet the Mayor’s target of meeting 25% public and private sector clients from early of London’s energy needs from decentralised stage resource assessments and policy advice sources by 2025. through to scheme design, business case and procurement. We work closely with clients at Thanks to previous mayoral programmes such each stage to scope the opportunities, analyse as the London Heat Map and Decentralised the fundamentals and develop practicable Energy Masterplanning (DEMaP), the solutions for bankable projects. challenge today is no longer knowing where the opportunities lie; it is understanding how to deliver them in the face of multiple barriers, including: - long investment horizons; - limited windows of opportunity; - an opaque regulatory framework; - a stigma of poorly performing schemes in the past; and - limited experience among local authorities and developers. 2 Understanding the challenge Delivering solutions The unique working philosophy at Arup – Through our global knowledge management founded on flexibility, transparency and systems, we are able to harness ideas and ability to deliver – is ideally suited to practical experience from projects worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Suburban Taxi Drivers' Roadshow 2017
    1 Suburban Taxi Drivers’ Roadshow July 2016 – February 2017 2 Meeting the Team TPH General Manager Helen Chapman Head of Stakeholder Compliance Delivery Head of Policy Strategy and Relations Manager Infrastructure Manager Tom Moody Silka Kennedy-Todd Edgerton Rodgers Darren Crowson 3 Taxi and Private Hire Action Plan Enhancing Public Safety: We are bringing in a number of new measures to enhance public safety, including: • Quadrupling the number of on-street compliance officers on the streets of London • Requiring private hire drivers to pass an advanced driving test before they can be licensed or relicensed • Progressing measures to improve safety standards by implementing an enhanced topographical test for private hire drivers before they can be licensed or relicensed • Reviewing operator compliance costs to ensure licence fee structure for private hire operators reflects the cost of compliance activity • Looking into the feasibility of introducing a minimum three-year enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service check for drivers, to guarantee a full and comprehensive period of criminal history is available. 4 Taxi and Private Hire Action Plan New initiatives for the taxi trade: • Providing taxis access to an additional 20 TfL bus lanes and writing to boroughs across London to ask them to consider access for an additional 40 bus lanes • Adding taxi information to our online journey planner • Card and contactless payment options were made mandatory on 31 October to make it even easier for customers to pay, while giving drivers the time they need to prepare • Delivering the Ranks Action Plan, including increasing the number of taxi ranks in London by 20 per cent by 2020 (from 500 to 600) • Giving taxi drivers better access to our facilities, such as toilets within our estate • Reviewing the annual taxi fares process to ensure drivers and customers get the best deals.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment & Regeneration in LB Enfield
    Employment & Regeneration in LB Enfield September 2015 DRAFT 1 Introduction • LB Enfield and Enfield Transport Users Group (ETUG) have produced a report suggesting some large scale alterations to the bus network. One of the objectives of the report is to meet the demands of the borough’s housing and regeneration aspirations. • TfL have already completed a study of access to health services owing to a re-configuration of services between Chase Farm, North Middlesex and Barnet General Hospital and shared this with LB Enfield. • TfL and LB Enfield have now agreed to a further study to explore the impact of committed development and new employment on bus services in the borough as a second phase of work. 2 DRAFT Aims This study will aim to: •Asses the impact of new housing, employment and background growth on the current network and travel patterns. •Highlight existing shortfalls of the current network. •Propose ideas for improving the network, including serving new Developments. 3 DRAFT Approach to Study • Where do Enfield residents travel to and from to get to work? • To what extent does the coverage of the bus network match those travel patterns? • How much do people use the bus to access Enfield’s key employment areas and to what extent is the local job market expected to grow? • What are the weaknesses in bus service provision to key employment areas and how might this be improved? • What is the expected growth in demand over the next 10 years and where are the key areas of growth? • What short and long term resourcing and enhancements are required to support and facilitate growth in Enfield? 4 DRAFT Methodology •Plot census, passenger survey and committed development data by electoral ward •Overlay key bus routes •Analyse existing and future capacity requirements •Analyse passenger travel patterns and trip generation from key developments and forecast demand •Identify key issues •Develop service planning ideas 5 DRAFT Population Growth According to Census data LB Enfield experienced a 14.2% increase in population between 2001 and 2011 from 273,600 to 312,500.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Ungovernable'? Financialisation and the Governance Of
    Governing the ‘ungovernable’? Financialisation and the governance of transport infrastructure in the London ‘global city-region’ February 2018 Peter O’Briena* Andy Pikea and John Tomaneyb aCentre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK NE1 7RU. Email: peter.o’[email protected]; [email protected] bBartlett School of Planning, University College London, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, 620 Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, UK WC1H 0NN. Email: [email protected] *Corresponding author 1 Abstract The governance of infrastructure funding and financing at the city-region scale is a critical aspect of the continued search for mechanisms to channel investment into the urban landscape. In the context of the global financial crisis, austerity and uneven growth, national, sub-national and local state actors are being compelled to adopt the increasingly speculative activities of urban entrepreneurialism to attract new capital, develop ‘innovative’ financial instruments and models, and establish new or reform existing institutional arrangements for urban infrastructure governance. Amidst concerns about the claimed ‘ungovernability’ of ‘global’ cities and city-regions, governing urban infrastructure funding and financing has become an acute issue. Infrastructure renewal and development are interpreted as integral to urban growth, especially to underpin the size and scale of large cities and their significant contributions within national economies. Yet, oovercoming fragmented local jurisdictions to improve the governance and economic, social and environmental development of major metropolitan areas remains a challenge. The complex, and sometimes conflicting and contested inter-relationships at stake raise important questions about the role of the state in wrestling with entrepreneurial and managerialist governance imperatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Investment to Support Growth and Regeneration in Tottenham
    1 TRANSPORT INVESTMENT TO SUPPORT GROWTH AND REGENERATION IN TOTTENHAM February 2014 Transport Author: TfL Interchange, TfL Planning, February 2014 for London Transport Investment to Support Growth and Regeneration in Transport for London Tottenham, February 2014 Transport for London Mayoral foreword Tottenham is brimming with opportunity and ripe for investment and I want to see the area regenerated with the support of the people who live and work there. I am working to achieve this with Haringey Council who I know share the same 2 ambition. planned level of growth. The interchange at Change is not only an ambition - Investment Tottenham Hale offers international connectivity and change is a reality that is happening now. via Stansted airport, while the Victoria line Hundreds of millions of public and private provides a high frequency service to central investment has gone into new developments London. Building on this good base, further at Tottenham Hale, supported by current and investment is needed to support the ambitious planned transport investment. There is also growth plans, improve local services for growing interest from developers and investors Tottenham’s existing and future residents, and in further opportunities there and elsewhere in strengthen connections to other growth areas, Tottenham, especially to build the new homes such as Stratford. that we need at prices that will be affordable for a broad range of London households. Transport improvements are already being delivered, with Transport for London transforming This growing appetite to invest in Tottenham’s the vast Tottenham Hale gyratory into a future is just one facet of the shared vision space that is more hospitable for cyclists and to transform Tottenham into London’s next pedestrians.
    [Show full text]