512 St Clair 2009-A.Cdr
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Staff Report
STAFF REPORT April 12, 2006 To: Works Committee From: Gary Welsh, General Manager, Transportation Services Subject: Potential to increase the Number of Taxi Stands Adjacent to TTC Subway Stations (All Wards) Purpose: To respond to a request from City Council for a report on the feasibility of increasing the number of Taxi Stands in the vicinity of Subway Stations. Financial Implications and Impact Statement: The funds associated with the introduction of the appropriate regulatory signage are contained in the approved Transportation Services Division 2006 Operating Budget. Recommendations: It is recommended that: (1) the following 26 new Taxi Stands as described in Attachment #1, be established in the vicinity of Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Subway Stations; and (2) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, including the introduction in Council of any bills that may be required. Background: City Council, at its meeting held on May 17, 18 and 19, 2005, in adopting Consolidated Clause 16 (j) in Works Committee Report 5, requested that Transportation Services staff report to the Works Committee on the feasibility of increasing the number of Taxi Stands around TTC Subway Stations, and further that representatives of the Taxi industry, in particular Ms. Souter, General Manager of Beck Taxi, be invited to depute on the item. - 2 - Comments: The issue of designating Taxi Stands in the vicinity of Subway Stations was last dealt with by the former Metropolitan Toronto Council in February, 1992. At that time, the former area municipalities were requested to implement designated Taxi Stands at Subway Station locations. -
Bus Bridging Decision-Support Toolkit: Optimization Framework and Policy Analysis
Bus Bridging Decision-Support Toolkit: Optimization Framework and Policy Analysis by Alaa Itani A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering University of Toronto © Copyright by Alaa Itani 2019 Bus Bridging Decision-Support Toolkit: Optimization Framework and Policy Analysis Alaa Itani Master of Applied Science Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering University of Toronto 2019 Abstract Bus Bridging is the strategy most commonly applied in responding to rail service interruptions in North America and Europe. In determining the required number of buses and source routes, most transit agencies rely on ad-hoc approaches based on operational experience and constraints, which can lead to extensive delays and queue build-ups at affected stations. This thesis developed an optimization model, to determine the optimal number of shuttle buses and route allocation which minimize the overall subway and bus riders delay. The generated optimal solutions are sensitive to bus bay capacity constraints along the shuttle service corridor. The optimization model is integrated with a previously developed simulation tool that tracks the evolution of system queues and delays throughout the bus bridging process. A set of bus bridging policy guidelines were developed based on further analysis of the optimization model outputs using a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model. ii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my parents and for their continuous support and trust in my abilities. Although they were thousands of miles away, they were always supportive, I couldn’t have made it here without their presence. -
Marketing Flyer V2.Indd
FOR LEASE 30 INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD SINGLE STOREY TORONTO, ONTARIO FLEX OFFICE FOR LEASE Available Space: Approximately 35,000 sq. ft. DIVISIBLE from approximately 6,000 sq. ft. and up. ASKING NET RENT: ABUNDANT SURFACE $17.00/SQ. FT. (Years 1-5) PARKING: $19.00/SQ. FT. (Years 6-10) 4.33 PER 1,000 SQ. FT. ADDITIONAL RENT (2016 ESTIMATE): $9.00/SQ. FT. (excludes janitorial & utilities) TENANT IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE: $40.00/SQ. FT. FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: Rendering *Sales Representative GLENN THACKERAY* KAY LOCKE* DANIEL LACEY* Vice President, LEED GA Senior Sales Associate Senior Sales Associate 416 798 6281 416 798 6268 416 798 6248 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] BUILDING SPECIFICATIONS: • 136 tons to the entire building HVAC IT SERVICE • Bell, Telus and Allstream • 1 ton per 358 sq. ft. CEILING • 14’ to the concrete slab ELECTRICAL • 600 Amps HEIGHT FLOOR SLAB • 4” concrete FLOOR PLAN: TOTAL OF 46,840 SQ. FT. 8 2 11 NEW NEW removerrerememmomovovevee frofromfromm existingeexexisxiststistiningngg * 1.5811.5588 m (17((1177 sqft)ssqsqfqftft)t) UNITUNITUUNNINITITT 44: UNITUNITUUNNINITITT 5:5 565.9556655.5.9.99595 m2 828.81882288.8.8.8811 m2 6,092(6,092((6(6,(6,06,0,090909292 2SQ. sqft)ssqsqfqftqft)ft)t)) FT. 8,921(8,921((8(8,98,98,92,9292921 SQ.211 sqft)ssqsqfqftqft)ft) )FT. 13 12 UNITI 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT984.545 m1:2 UNIT926.46 m 22: 1,045.801 UNIT m2 3: 10,598(10,598 8SQ. sqft) FT. 9,972(9,972 SQ.sqft)s FT. -
Bloor-Danforth Subway Extensions to Kipling and Kennedy
Bloor-Danforth Subway Extensions to Kipling and Kennedy UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 TERMINAL "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO 2 DECEMBER 1980 The Newsletter is published monthly by the Upper Canada Railway Society, Box 122, Terminal "A", Toronto, Ont. M5W 1A2. Editor: Stuart I. Westland, 78 Edenbridge Dr., Islington, Ontario, Canada M9A 3G2 Telephone (416) 239-5254 Assistant Editor: John D. Thompson (416) 759-1803 Activities Editor: Ed Campbell 251-8356 Please address all correspondence relative to the Newsletter to the Editor at the above address. The Newsletter is mailed monthly to members of the Society in good standing. Membership fee is .$17 for January 1981 to December 1981 inclusive. COVER- A pair of TTC H5 subway cars were appropriately decorated for the official opening of the Bloor-Danforth Subway extensions, on Friday, Nov. 21, 1980. —TTC photos by Ted Wickson QUOTE OF THE MONTH- (Extracts from an editorial in the Toronto Star of November 5, chosen by the Newsletter particularly to mark the completion of the Kennedy and Kipling extensions): "In the past two years the politicians... have ducked the hard decision about investing in the TTC as a force that could determine the future development of Metro—the fastest, — most convenient form of public transit is the kind that runs on fixed rail such as the subway or LRT—Even in the fitful economy of the '80's, a new transit line can have a stimulating effect. Metro needs more of them. The next obvious one is an east-west line along Eglinton, Sheppard or Finch Avenues—If politicians show a bit of nerve and build fixed rail transit into thinly populated areas, experience has shown these soon become thickly populated areas. -
Assessment of Provincial Proposals Line 2 East Extension
EX9.1 Attachment 5 – Assessment of Provincial Proposals Line 2 East Extension As directed by City Council in April 2019, City and TTC staff have assessed the Province’s proposed 3-stop Line 2 East Extension. The details of this assessment are provided in this attachment. 1. Project Summary 1.1 Project Description The Line 2 East Extension (L2EE), as proposed by the Province, is an approximately 8 kilometre underground extension of Line 2 Bloor-Danforth from Kennedy Station that will have three stations – at Lawrence and McCowan, Scarborough Centre and Sheppard and McCowan, as shown in Figure 1. The Province's plan for the L2EE is similar to what was being planned by the City and TTC prior to 2016. Figure 1 - Line 2 East Extension Reference Map Note: Map produced by City/TTC based on current understanding of project Attachment 5 – Assessment of Line 2 East Extension Page 1 of 9 As proposed, the extension will be fully integrated with the existing Line 2 and have through service at Kennedy Station. A turn-back may be included east of Kennedy Station to enable reduced service to Scarborough Centre, subject to demand and service standards. The extension will require approximately seven additional six-car, 138-metre-long trains to provide the service. The trains would be interoperable with the other trains on Line 2. With the station at Sheppard and McCowan supporting storage of up to six trains, there is sufficient storage and maintenance capacity existing at the TTC’s Line 2 storage and maintenance facilities to accommodate this increase in fleet size. -
Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020
Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Contents Executive Summary 1 Scope 1 Method of Analysis 1 Findings 3 Strategic Case 3 Economic Case 3 Financial Case 4 Deliverability and Operations Case 4 Summary 4 Introduction 7 Background 8 Business Case Overview 10 Problem Statement 13 Case for Change 14 Problem Statement 14 Opportunity for Change 15 Key Drivers 16 Strategic Value 18 iv Investment Options 24 Introduction 25 Study Area 25 Options Development 25 Options for Analysis 27 Assumptions for Analysis and Travel Demand Modelling 33 Strategic Case 34 Introduction 35 Strategic Objective 1 – Connect More Places with Better Frequent Rapid Transit 38 Criterion 1: To provide high quality transit to more people in more places 38 Criterion 2: To address the connectivity gap between Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Transitway BRT 40 Strategic Objective 2 – Improve Transit’s Convenience and Attractiveness 42 Criterion 2: To provide more reliable, safe and enjoyable travel experience 42 Criterion 2: To boost transit use and attractiveness among local residents and workers 45 Strategic Objective 3 – Promote Healthier and More Sustainable Travel Behaviours 52 Criterion 1: To improve liveability through reduction in traffic delays, auto dependency and air pollution 52 Criterion 2: To encourage use of active modes to access stations 53 v Strategic Objective 4 – Encourage Transit-Supportive Development 57 Criterion 1: Compatibility with Existing Neighbourhood -
Enhanced Eglinton West Rapid Transit Initial Business Case Analysis
APPENDIX 4 ENHANCED EGLINTON WEST RAPID TRANSIT INITIAL BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS JUNE 2016 Cover Image: Marcus Bowman TABLE OF CONTENTS Problem Statement II 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Context 2 3.0 Study Overview 4 4.0 Strategic Case 9 5.0 Financial Case 18 6.0 Economic Case 20 7.0 Deliverability and Operations Case 23 8.0 Next Steps 25 Appendix 26 I PROBLEM STATEMENT The implementation of the Mississauga BRT, Eglinton Crosstown Phase 1, as well as Union Pearson Express and RER connections at Mt. Dennis will bring vital rapid transit improvements to the Eglinton corridor and the region, but will also leave a key gap in the rapid transit network along Eglinton West between Mt. Dennis and Renforth Gateway. The corridor provides an opportunity for a connection to Pearson Airport and surrounding employment by linking communities, people, and jobs to and along the Mississauga BRT and Eglinton LRT. An Environmental Assessment was completed in 2010 for an at- grade LRT through the corridor with 14 stops along Eglinton Ave at all cross roads. In the context of current planning work being coordinated between Metrolinx and the City of Toronto there is a need to develop feasible options to optimize the 2010 EA design and understand their various benefits to different users and travel patterns. II INITIAL BUSINESS CASE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Eglinton West: A Gap in the Regional Rapid Transit Network The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area’s Regional Transportation Plan, The Big Move, was adopted in 2008 and set out a 25-year vision for supporting growth in the region. -
Kipling Bus Terminal – Bus Access, Operations and Maintenance Agreement
11.2 Date: May 25, 2020 Originator’s files: To: Mayor and Members of Council From: Geoff Wright, P.Eng, MBA, Commissioner of Meeting date: Transportation and Works June 17, 2020 Subject Kipling Bus Terminal – Bus Access, Operations and Maintenance Agreement Recommendation That a By-law be enacted to authorize the Commissioner of Transportation and Works and the City Clerk to execute on behalf of The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, the Bus Access, Operations and Maintenance Agreement with Metrolinx and any amendments and/or ancillary documents thereto, for the access, operations and maintenance of the Kipling Bus Terminal, all in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. Report Highlights In alignment with direction from The Big Move (2008), Metrolinx initiated the detailed design and construction of the Kipling Bus Terminal in 2018. Substantial completion is planned for fall 2020 with the intent for MiWay to shift services from Islington Station to the Kipling Bus Terminal at the end of 2020 or early 2021. As Metrolinx is the owner and operator of the Kipling Bus Terminal and as MiWay will have the right to utilize the terminal and its facilities for its transit related purposes, the City of Mississauga (the “City”) and Metrolinx are required to enter into an agreement setting out the terms of use, operations and maintenance responsibilities and cost sharing obligations. The Bus Access, Operations and Maintenance Agreement has been prepared by City staff and Metrolinx, and this new Agreement will replace the existing Kipling Station Redevelopment Memorandum of Understanding signed on March 7, 2017 and as amended on March 21, 2018. -
Feeling Congested?" – Update on Progress to Date
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED "Feeling Congested?" – Update on Progress to Date Date: May 26, 2014 To: Planning and Growth Management Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division Wards: All Reference P:\2014\ClusterB\PLN\PGMC\PG14076 Number: SUMMARY The current review of the Official Plan's transportation policies has been divided into two approval streams. One set of policy amendments is proceeding towards final approval within this term of Council, while the remainder continue under review with a target approval date of early 2015. This latter set of policies comprises four important transportation planning areas, namely: Rapid Transit Evaluation Framework (RTEF); Surface Transit Network; Cycling Policy Framework; and Street Related Maps and Schedules. This report provides an update on the progress being made on the ongoing review of these four transportation policy areas. RECOMMENDATIONS The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division recommends that: 1. The Planning and Growth Management Committee receive this report for information Financial Impact There are no financial impacts resulting from the adoption of this report. Staff report for action on "Feeling Congested?" Update Report 1 DECISION HISTORY Section 26 of the Planning Act requires each municipality to conduct a review of its Official Plan within five years of it coming into force. At its meeting in May, 2011, the Planning and Growth Management Committee adopted, with amendment, the Chief Planner’s recommendations regarding the general work programme and public consultation strategy for the City’s Five Year Official Plan Review and Municipal Comprehensive Review contained in PG5.2 Five Year Review of the Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Review. -
St. Clair Avenue West Transportation Master Plan
³ Legend A! Monitoring Well Locations <! Geotechnical Borehole Preferred Plan St. Clair Widening Gunns Road Extension Keele Street Extension Davenport Road Extension REFERENCE Imagery © 2018 Microsoft Corporation and its data suppliers Meters Scale: As Shown http://www.bing.com/maps 0 200 400 600 Projection: UTM Zone 17N Datum: NAD 83 St. Clair Avenue West EXHIBIT 3-5 Transportation Master Plan Borehole and Monitoring Well Locations St Clair Avenue West Transportation Master Plan Groundwater level measurements were carried out by WSP staff at nine monitoring wells on May 2 and May 3, 2016. Water levels measured ranged from 0.91 mbgs to 9.02 mbgs. Three wells were noted to be dry to depths ranging from 7.4 mbgs to 8.1 mbgs. The groundwater monitoring indicates that the shallow groundwater levels are generally between 6.5 mbgs and 9.0 mbgs within the Study Area, with the exception located at BH15-15 (in the vicinity of the tributary to Black Creek), where the static water level was measured 0.91 mbgs. Based on the design drawings, construction is unlikely to intercept the groundwater table and preliminary dewatering estimates indicate that the volume of excess water generated during earthworks is likely to be minimal, and would not require an Environmental Activity and Sector Registry (EASR) or Permit to Take Water (PTTW). These estimates should be updated through the detailed design process when additional hydrogeological information becomes available. For the analyzed metals and inorganics parameters, chloride was the only parameter that exceeded the applicable standard at BH15-15, located within the Keele Street extension. -
Exchange Arrival Guide INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Welcome to the Schulich Community!
Exchange Arrival Guide INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Welcome to the Schulich Community! Dear Exchange Student, International Relations Office Room: W262P, SSB; Tel: +1-416-736-5059 Email: [email protected] Congratulations on being accepted to the Schulich School of Business at York Website: exchange@schulich University in Toronto, Canada! Cheryl Stickley Our team in the International Relations Office looks forward to welcoming you to Graduate International Program Coordinator Schulich, Toronto, and Canada. We hope that your time here will be a successful one Email: [email protected] filled with exciting opportunities. Tina Fantin Undergraduate International Program Our office is dedicated to making your transition to Canada a smooth one. We have Coordinator compiled this arrival guidebook for exchange students to address some of the most Email: [email protected] frequently asked questions regarding the arrival on campus and getting settled in the community. We hope that you will find this guide helpful. Lan Yu International Information Assistant Please contact us if you have any questions. Email: [email protected] Ann Welsh We look forward to meeting you at the Exchange Orientation. International Student Support Specialist Email: [email protected] Sincerely, Tim Tang Cheryl, Tina, Ann, Lan and Tim Director, International Relations Email: [email protected] Office Hours Monday through Friday 9:00 AM EST – 4:30 PM EST PREPARING TO ARRIVE IN CANADA Engage in Student Life The Open Arms Committee The Open Arms Committee (OAC) is a student-run organization at Schulich with the purpose of facilitating the transition of exchange students by trying to help them adjust to their new environment and settle into Schulich. -
GET TORONTO MOVING Transportation Plan
2 ‘GET TORONTO MOVING’ TRANSPORTATION PLAN SUMMARY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Who we are 4 Policy 4 Rapid Transit Subways 5 Findings of the 1985 ‘Network 2011’ TTC Study 6 Transit Projects Around The World 6 ‘SmartTrack’ 7 GO Trains 7 Roads 10 Elevated Gardiner Expressway 12 Bicycle Trails 14 Funding 16 Toronto Transportation History Timeline 17 BIBLIOGRAPHY ‘Network 2011’ TTC Report 1985 Boro Lukovic – tunnelling expert Globe and Mail newspaper GO Transit Canadian Automobile Association Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Ontario Teachers Pension Fund Investment Board City of Toronto Metrolinx 3 WHO WE ARE The task force who have contributed to this plan consist of: James Alcock – Urban transportation planner Bruce Bryer – Retired TTC employee Kurt Christensen – political advisor and former Scarborough City Councillor Bill Robertson – Civil Engineer Kevin Walters – Civil Engineer POLICY There are two ways needed to end traffic gridlock: High-capacity rapid transit and improved traffic flow. The overall guiding policy of this plan is: the "Get Toronto Moving' Transportation Plan oversees policies and projects with the goal of improving the efficiency of all modes of transportation which are the choices of the people of Toronto, including automobiles, public transit, cycling and walking within available corridors. The City has no place to ‘encourage’ or entice people to switch to different forms of transportation from what they regularly use. That is the free choice of the people. The City and the Province are only responsible for providing the facilities for the transportation choices of the people. Neighbourhoods and residential and commercial communities must be left intact to flourish.